This statistic shows the projected top ten largest national economies in 2050. By 2050, China is forecasted to have a gross domestic product of over ** trillion U.S. dollars.

Roughly ** percent of the annual GDP of lower income countries worldwide in 2050 could be at risk of loss due to exposure to climate hazards, in a slow transition scenario without adaptation measures. Extreme heat and water stress are forecast to have the biggest impact, at *** and *** percent, respectively. In contrast, in upper income countries, the same hazards would put less than one percent of the annual GDP at risk. Nevertheless, climate hazards would still put almost ***** percent of upper income countries' GDP at risk by 2050, in a no-adaptation scenario.

Under current climate policies, Sudan would face a GDP loss of 32 percent by 2050 and a shrinkage of over 80 percent by 2100 due to climate change. According to the source's estimates, this would be the most significant loss among all assessed countries in Africa. Even in a scenario of limiting temperatures to 1.5 degrees Celsius, the damage to Sudan's economy would stand at a GDP reduction of 22 percent by 2050 and 51 percent by 2100. Eight out of 10 countries estimated to record the largest GDP reduction because of climate change globally were located in Africa. The estimates did not consider potential adaptation measures to alleviate the economic loss.

The impact of climate change has been forecasted to affect the economies of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) the hardest. The maximum projected loss incurred by the ASEAN in the event of a 3.2°C temperature rise is 37.4 percent. This is more than double the forecast loss of the Advanced Asia economies and 10 percent higher than the next largest forecast loss of the Middle East & Africa.

This statistic shows the top ten countries projected to have the greatest average annual growth in gross domestic product from 2016 to 2050. From 2016 to 2050, Vietnam is projected to have an average annual GDP growth rate of * percent.

IntroductionThe combined populations of China and India were 2.78 billion in 2020, representing 36% of the world population (7.75 billion). Wheat is the second most important staple grain in both China and India. In 2019, the aggregate wheat consumption in China was 96.4 million ton and in India it was 82.5 million ton, together it was more than 35% of the world's wheat that year. In China, in 2050, the projected population will be 1294–1515 million, and in India, it is projected to be 14.89–1793 million, under the low and high-fertility rate assumptions. A question arises as to, what will be aggregate demand for wheat in China and India in 2030 and 2050?MethodsApplying the Vector Error Correction model estimation process in the time series econometric estimation setting, this study projected the per capita and annual aggregate wheat consumptions of China and India during 2019-2050. In the process, this study relies on agricultural data sourced from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States (FAO) database (FAOSTAT), as well as the World Bank's World Development Indicators (WDI) data catalog. The presence of unit root in the data series are tested by applying the augmented Dickey-Fuller test; Philips-Perron unit root test; Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin test, and Zivot-Andrews Unit Root test allowing for a single break in intercept and/or trend. The test statistics suggest that a natural log transformation and with the first difference of the variables provides stationarity of the data series for both China and India. The Zivot-Andrews Unit Root test, however, suggested that there is a structural break in urban population share and GDP per capita. To tackle the issue, we have included a year dummy and two multiplicative dummies in our model. Furthermore, the Johansen cointegration test suggests that at least one variable in both data series were cointegrated. These tests enable us to apply Vector Error Correction (VEC) model estimation procedure. In estimation the model, the appropriate number of lags of the variables is confirmed by applying the “varsoc” command in Stata 17 software interface. The estimated yearly per capita wheat consumption in 2030 and 2050 from the VEC model, are multiplied by the projected population in 2030 and 2050 to calculate the projected aggregate wheat demand in China and India in 2030 and 2050. After projecting the yearly per capita wheat consumption (KG), we multiply with the projected population to get the expected consumption demand.ResultsThis study found that the yearly per capita wheat consumption of China will increase from 65.8 kg in 2019 to 76 kg in 2030, and 95 kg in 2050. In India, the yearly per capita wheat consumption will increase to 74 kg in 2030 and 94 kg in 2050 from 60.4 kg in 2019. Considering the projected population growth rates under low-fertility assumptions, aggregate wheat consumption of China will increase by more than 13% in 2030 and by 28% in 2050. Under the high-fertility rate assumption, however the aggregate wheat consumption of China will increase by 18% in 2030 and nearly 50% in 2050. In the case of India, under both low and high-fertility rate assumptions, aggregate wheat demand in India will increase by 32-38% in 2030 and by 70-104% in 2050 compared to 2019 level of consumption.DiscussionsOur results underline the importance of wheat in both countries, which are the world's top wheat producers and consumers, and suggest the importance of research and development investments to maintain sufficient national wheat grain production levels to meet China and India's domestic demand. This is critical both to ensure the food security of this large segment of the world populace, which also includes 23% of the total population of the world who live on less than US $1.90/day, as well as to avoid potential grain market destabilization and price hikes that arise in the event of large import demands.

From the IPCC website: The B2 world is one of increased concern for environmental and social sustainability. Education and welfare programs are widely pursued leading to reductions in mortality and, to a lesser extent, fertility. The population reaches about 10 billion people by 2100, consistent with both the United Nations and IIASA median projections. Income per capita grows at an intermediary rate to reach about US$12,000 by 2050. By 2100 the global economy might expand to reach some US$250 trillion. International income differences decrease, although not as rapidly as in scenarios of higher global convergence (A1, B1). Local inequity is reduced considerably through the development of stronger community support networks. Generally high educational levels promote both development and environmental protection. Indeed, environmental protection is one of the few remaining truly international priorities. However, strategies to address global environmental challenges are less successful than in B1, as governments have difficulty designing and implementing agreements that combine environmental protection with mutual economic benefits. The B2 storyline presents a particularly favorable climate for community initiative and social innovation, especially in view of high educational levels. Technological frontiers are pushed less than in A1 and B1 and innovations are also regionally more heterogeneous. Globally, investment in R&D continues its current declining trend, and mechanisms for international diffusion of technology and know-how remain weaker than in scenarios A1 and B1 (but higher than in scenario A2). Some regions with rapid economic development and limited natural resources place particular emphasis on technology development and bilateral co-operation. Technical change is therefore uneven. The energy intensity of GDP declines at about one percent per year, in line with the average historical experience of the last two centuries. Land-use management becomes better integrated at the local level in the B2 world. Urban and transport infrastructure is a particular focus of community innovation, contributing to a low level of car dependence and less urban sprawl. An emphasis on food self-reliance contributes to a shift in dietary patterns towards local products, with reduced meat consumption in countries with high population densities. Energy systems differ from region to region, depending on the availability of natural resources. The need to use energy and other resources more efficiently spurs the development of less carbon-intensive technology in some regions. Environment policy cooperation at the regional level leads to success in the management of some transboundary environmental problems, such as acidification due to SO2, especially to sustain regional self-reliance in agricultural production. Regional cooperation also results in lower emissions of NOx and VOCs, reducing the incidence of elevated tropospheric ozone levels. Although globally the energy system remains predominantly hydrocarbon-based to 2100, there is a gradual transition away from the current share of fossil resources in world energy supply, with a corresponding reduction in carbon intensity. Data are available for the following periods: 1961-1990, 2010-2039; 2040-2069; and 2090-2099 Mean monthly and change fields.

BackgroundHematologic malignancies (HM) impose substantial healthcare and productivity-related costs globally. However, disparities in economic impact across regions and countries remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to evaluate the global, regional, and national economic burden of HM and its subtypes (leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and Hodgkin lymphoma) from 1990 to 2021, with projections to 2050.MethodsData from the Global Burden of Disease 2021 study were utilized to estimate the economic burden of HM using the value of a statistical life year (VSLY) approach, based on disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Decomposition analysis was conducted to identify drivers of economic burden, including population growth and aging. Future trends were modeled using the Bayesian Age-Period-Cohort (BAPC) model, and comparisons of economic burden were made across countries by income levels.ResultsIn 2021, the global economic burden of HM reached $1.516 trillion, a 52.8% increase from $992 billion in 1990. This represented approximately 1% of the global GDP, with high-income countries (HICs) bearing the largest share of 2.17% of GDP, compared to 0.58% in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). The United States had the highest national burden at $417.42 billion (95% UI: $389.49–$435.80 billion), followed by China $133.84 billion (95% UI: $98.63–$166.21 billion), $113.03 billion (95% UI: $101.62–$122.88 billion), and Japan $88.30 billion (95% UI: $85.65–$90.24 billion). By 2050, the global burden is projected to decline to $1.249 trillion, driven by healthcare advancements in HICs, but with a rising burden in upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), which are expected to account for 48.1% of the global burden. China is projected to lead globally with $421.65 billion (95% UI: $314.68–$1,495.35 billion), followed by India ($123.8 billion), while the United States is expected to decline to $101.6 billion. Subtype-specific analysis revealed that Leukemia accounted for the largest proportion of the burden in 2021 ($651 billion, 42.9%), followed by NHL ($492 billion, 32.5%), multiple myeloma ($278.17 billion, 100.5%), and Hodgkin lymphoma ($43.84 billion, 21%).ConclusionsThe economic burden of HM has increased significantly, with marked disparities across regions and income levels. By 2050, the burden is expected to shift from high- to middle-income countries. Investments in early diagnosis, affordable treatments, and healthcare improvements are essential to reduce the burden and address inequities.

As per Cognitive Market Research's latest published report, the Global Non-Stick Cookware market size will be $13,628.21 Million by 2028.The Global Non-Stick Cookware Industry's Compound Annual Growth Rate will 3.73% from 2023 to 2030.

The North America Non-Stick Cookware market size will be USD 4,572.27 Million by 2028.

Factors Affecting the Non Stick Cookware Market

Increasing population ratio and rapid urbanization in emerging countries

China and India are the world's biggest creating economies and furthermore two of the most crowded nations. China, which presently has more than 1.3 billion individuals, is required to develop to more than 1.4 billion by 2050, and India with a population of 1 billion will surpass China to be the most crowded nation with about a 1.6 billion population. These population giants are home to 37% of the total population today. Also, China and India have made eminent progress in their financial improvement described by a high pace of GDP development over the most recent two decades. Together the two nations account as of now for just about a fifth of world GDP.

Developing nations, for example, India and China have abounding population besting the one-billion imprints; both experienced the progress from a shut economy to a more market–situated commitment with the outside world in exchange and speculation; and both to date are in the procedures of industrialization and modernization joined by significant rates of economic growth.

The rapid urbanization in many countries including developed nations over the past 50 years appears to have been joined by unnecessarily elevated levels of grouping of the urban population in extremely enormous urban communities. In any case, in a develop arrangement of urban communities, economic activity is increasingly spread out. Since forever, urban areas have been the primary habitats of learning, culture and development.

It is not surprising that the world's most urban countries tend to be the richest and have the highest human development. Progressing rapid urbanization can possibly improve the prosperity of social orders. Albeit just around a large portion of the world's kin live in urban areas, they create in excess of 80 percent of Global Domestic Product (GDP).

Due to growing population and urbanization people spending capacity has also increased gradually. People give preference to the health development. Additionally, increasing urbanization results in surging nuclear family which enhances the demand for kitchen appliances and cookware. Moreover, rise in working-class population prefers quickly made home-cooked healthy food with the help of modern kitchen appliances that results in mounting of demand for non-stick cookware.

Following graph shows the, world's population who lives in urban area. Also, every region provides the growth ratio of their population from year 1990 till forecast year 2050. All in one this analysis shows how population growth impacts on rapid urbanization. According to graph, Asia Pacific region’s population growth is expected to grow in forecast period.

Varieties of non-stick cookware and wide availability in retail channels

Restraints for Non-Stick Cookware Market

Availability of substitute products. (Access Detailed Analysis in the Full Report Version)

Opportunities for Non-Stick Cookware Market

Rise in disposable income and spending habits. (Access Detailed Analysis in the Full Report Version)

Introduction of Non Stick Cookware

A non-stick cookware is a kitchen cookware such as non-stick pans that has a non-stick surface engineered to reduce the ability of other materials to stick to it. It ensures quick proper cooking of the food in the cookware without sticking. The commonly used non-stick coating cookware is Teflon, ceramic coated cookware.

There are various benefits of non-stick cookware such as affordable, lightweight, easy to handle provides easy cleaning of food. The non-stick cookware in form of frying pans, saucepan, griller, casseroles are made up of different coating material such as Teflon, ceramic coated, anodized aluminum, these are durable, user-friendly, scratch resistant and are stable at temperature till 300 degree Celsius. They use less oil and allows even heat distribution that enhances the flavors of dish and quick heating enables quicker cooking of t...

In the scenario, that India follows its current national goals, its gross domestic product (GDP) is estimated to decline by over ***** percent by 2030 and over **** percent by 2050. India is especially vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and the effect on GDP is estimated to be worse than the global average.

Since the beginning of the 21st century, the BRICS countries have been considered the five foremost developing economies in the world. Originally, the term BRIC was used by economists when talking about the emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India, and China, however these countries have held annual summits since 2009, and the group has expanded to include South Africa since 2010. China has the largest GDP of the BRICS country, at 16.86 trillion U.S. dollars in 2021, while the others are all below three trillion. Combined, the BRICS bloc has a GDP over 25.85 trillion U.S. dollars in 2022, which is slightly more than the United States. BRICS economic development China has consistently been the largest economy of this bloc, and its rapid growth has seen it become the second largest economy in the world, behind the U.S.. China's growth has also been much faster than the other BRICS countries; for example, when compared with the second largest BRICS economy, its GDP was less than double the size of Brazil's in 2000, but is almost six times larger than India's in 2021. Since 2000, the country with the second largest GDP has fluctuated between Brazil, Russia, and India, due to a variety of factors, although India has held this position since 2015 (when the other two experienced recession), and it's growth rate is on track to surpass China's in the coming decade. South Africa has consistently had the smallest economy of the BRICS bloc, and it has just the third largest economy in Africa; its inclusion in this group is due to the fact that it is the most advanced and stable major economy in Africa, and it holds strategic importance due to the financial potential of the continent in the coming decades. Future developments It is predicted that China's GDP will overtake that of the U.S. by the end of the 2020s, to become the largest economy in the world, while some also estimate that India will also overtake the U.S. around the middle of the century. Additionally, the BRICS group is more than just an economic or trading bloc, and its New Development Bank was established in 2014 to invest in sustainable infrastructure and renewable energy across the globe. While relations between its members were often strained or of less significance in the 20th century, their current initiatives have given them a much greater international influence. The traditional great powers represented in the Group of Seven (G7) have seen their international power wane in recent decades, while BRICS countries have seen theirs grow, especially on a regional level. Today, the original BRIC countries combine with the Group of Seven (G7), to make up 11 of the world's 12 largest economies, but it is predicted that they will move further up on this list in the coming decades.

In 2023, the estimated total GDP of all ASEAN states amounted to approximately 3.8 trillion U.S. dollars, a significant increase from the previous years. In fact, the GDP of the ASEAN region has been skyrocketing for a few years now, reflecting the region’s thriving economy. Power in the EastThe Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) comprises Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. It was established in 1967 among five of these countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore, and the Philippines) to facilitate trade and economic growth, as well as promote cultural development and social structures in the region. To date, they have been joined by another five nations. The ASEAN marketThe founding of the ASEAN organization provides the collaborating nations with more autonomy and influence on the global economy than they would have had by themselves. Additionally, struggling participating countries, such as Laos, are given an opportunity to grow on an ASEAN single market.

The statistic shows gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Indonesia from 1987 to 2023, with projections up until 2030. GDP is the total value of all goods and services produced in a country in a year. It is considered to be a very important indicator of the economic strength of a country and a positive change is an indicator of economic growth. In 2023, the GDP 29per capita in Indonesia amounted to around 4,919.94 U.S. dollars. Indonesia's gross domestic product on the rise Indonesia has the largest economy in Southeast Asia is considered one of the most important emerging market economies in the world. Indonesia is a member of the G-20 economies and a founding member of ASEAN. It has one of the largest gross domestic products in the world: In 2014, the Indonesian GDP was reported to exceed 856 billion U.S. dollars. GDP in Indonesia has been increasing rapidly and in 2011, it was estimated that it had grown by more than 6.4 percent in comparison to the previous year. That same year, global GDP amounted to more than 72 trillion U.S. dollars - with the exception of 2009, global GDP has been continuously increasing each year over the past decade. Based on purchasing power parity, Indonesia's share in the global GDP is significantly higher than that of other major economies, and in 2014 was almost on the same level with France and higher than the UK's share. According to a forecast by Goldman Sachs, Indonesia will be among the 15 countries with the largest gross domestic product worldwide by 2030. In addition, the gross domestic product per capita in Indonesia has also undergone a rapid increase. Over the past decade, GDP per capita in Indonesia has quadrupled, a remarkable feat seldom seen in any economy.

The statistic shows GDP in India from 1987 to 2024, with projections up until 2030. In 2024, GDP in India was at around 3.91 trillion U.S. dollars, and it is expected to reach six trillion by the end of the decade. See figures on India's economic growth here, and the Russian GDP for comparison. Historical development of the Indian economy In the 1950s and 1960s, the decision of the newly independent Indian government to adopt a mixed economy, adopting both elements of both capitalist and socialist systems, resulted in huge inefficiencies borne out of the culture of interventionism that was a direct result of the lackluster implementation of policy and failings within the system itself. The desire to move towards a Soviet style mass planning system failed to gain much momentum in the Indian case due to a number of hindrances, an unskilled workforce being one of many.When the government of the early 90’s saw the creation of small-scale industry in large numbers due to the removal of price controls, the economy started to bounce back, but with the collapse of the Soviet Union - India’s main trading partner - the hampering effects of socialist policy on the economy were exposed and it underwent a large-scale liberalization. By the turn of the 21st century, India was rapidly progressing towards a free-market economy. India’s development has continued and it now belongs to the BRICS group of fast developing economic powers, and the incumbent Modi administration has seen India's GDP double during its first decade in power.

Germany’s GDP per capita stood at almost 54,989.76 U.S. dollars in 2024. Germany ranked among the top 20 countries worldwide with the highest GDP per capita in 2021 – Luxembourg, Ireland and Switzerland were ranked the top three nations. Rising annual income in Germany The average annual wage in Germany has increased by around 5,000 euros since 2000, reaching in excess of 39,000 euros in 2016. Germany had the tenth-highest average annual wage among selected European Union countries in 2017, ranking between France and the United Kingdom. Growing employment More than two thirds of the working population in Germany are employed in the service sector, which generated the greatest share of the country’s GDP in 2018. Unemployment in Germany soared to its highest level in decades in 2005, but the rate has since dropped to below 3.5 percent. The youth unemployment rate in Germany has more than halved since 2005 and currently stands around 6.5 percent.

Gross domestic product is the total value of all goods and services produced in a country in a year. It is considered an important indicator of the economic strength of a country. In 2024, GDP in Turkey amounted to around 1,322.41 billion U.S. dollars. Gross domestic product as a reliable indicatorGross domestic product, or GDP for short, not only shows the aforementioned value; by doing so it gives an idea of the state of a country’s economy and standard of living. The higher and more stable a country’s GDP, the better its economic situation. Since GDP is measured consistently worldwide, comparisons between countries are possible and quite reliable. Turkey’s economy on the decline? Turkey’s gross domestic product has been on a decline for the past years and is estimated to hit rock bottom in 2019, with a projected steep upturn afterwards. At the same time, inflation is set to peak at almost 17.5 percent the same year, and unemployment is on the rise. All in all, the figures do not look promising for Turkey, but at least estimations assume a quick recovery. However, this economic development is likely due to the political path the country has chosen in recent years, and it remains to be seen if the forecasts will prove true in the future or if Turkey’s economy needs to brace itself for a further downturn instead.

While the tourism sector GDP share in Bulgaria was forecast to increase long-term between 2023 and 2028 by in total 2.4 percentage points, it is estimated to decrease in the years 2026, 2027, and 2028. The share is estimated to amount to 10.09 percent in 2028. While the share was forecast to increase significantly in the next years, the increase will slow down in the future.Depicted is the economic contribution of the tourism sector in relation to the gross domestic product of the country or region at hand.The forecast has been adjusted for the expected impact of COVID-19.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in more than 150 countries and regions worldwide. All input data are sourced from international institutions, national statistical offices, and trade associations. All data has been are processed to generate comparable datasets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the tourism sector GDP share in countries like Romania and Serbia.

In 2023, London had a gross domestic product of over 569 billion British pounds, by far the most of any region of the United Kingdom. The region of South East England which surrounds London had the second-highest GDP in this year, at over 360 billion pounds. North West England, which includes the major cities of Manchester and Liverpool, had the third-largest GDP among UK regions, at almost 250 billion pounds. Levelling Up the UK London’s economic dominance of the UK can clearly be seen when compared to the other regions of the country. In terms of GDP per capita, the gap between London and the rest of the country is striking, standing at over 63,600 pounds per person in the UK capital, compared with just over 37,100 pounds in the rest of the country. To address the economic imbalance, successive UK governments have tried to implement "levelling-up policies", which aim to boost investment and productivity in neglected areas of the country. The success of these programs going forward may depend on their scale, as it will likely take high levels of investment to reverse economic neglect regions have faced in the recent past. Overall UK GDP The gross domestic product for the whole of the United Kingdom amounted to 2.56 trillion British pounds in 2024. During this year, GDP grew by 0.9 percent, following a growth rate of 0.4 percent in 2023. Due to the overall population of the UK growing faster than the economy, however, GDP per capita in the UK fell in both 2023 and 2024. Nevertheless, the UK remains one of the world’s biggest economies, with just five countries (the United States, China, Japan, Germany, and India) having larger economies. It is it likely that several other countries will overtake the UK economy in the coming years, with Indonesia, Brazil, Russia, and Mexico all expected to have larger economies than Britain by 2050.