Historical dataset showing Singapore income inequality - gini coefficient by year from N/A to N/A.

The Global Gender Gap index score for wage equality for similar work in Singapore in 2023 was 0.78, with a score of 1 being absolute parity and a score of 0 being absolute imparity. Singapore has the third-smallest gender gap in South-east Asia, behind the Philippines and Laos. Nonetheless, gender equality in Singapore is still higher than other Asian countries such as Thailand and Japan.

In 2020, ***** percent of resident employed households had a monthly income of 20 thousand Singapore dollars and over. In comparison, only **** percent of households had a monthly income of less than one thousand Singapore dollars.

In 2024, the Gini coefficient after taxes amounted to 0.35 in Singapore. During the time surveyed, the Gini coefficient was highest in 2015, with an index score of 0.39. Since then, it has decreased in 2016 and 2020.

Comparing the *** selected regions regarding the gini index , South Africa is leading the ranking (**** points) and is followed by Namibia with **** points. At the other end of the spectrum is Slovakia with **** points, indicating a difference of *** points to South Africa. The Gini coefficient here measures the degree of income inequality on a scale from * (=total equality of incomes) to *** (=total inequality).The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in more than *** countries and regions worldwide. All input data are sourced from international institutions, national statistical offices, and trade associations. All data has been are processed to generate comparable datasets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).

Income inequality is an essential cause of violence, stagnant development, and political instability. This study will examine the positive and negative shocks in tourism development, and the distribution of the interaction between tourism development, economic growth, human capital, globalization, and income inequality will be discussed in Singapore, a developed and top-visited country. By adopting autoregressive distributed lag and non-linear autoregressive distributed lag approaches for panel data from 1978 to 2022, the results indicate an asymmetric cointegration among variables, and positive and negative changes in tourism development lead to decreased income inequality. More specifically, the asymmetric effect of tourism is found both in the short- and long-term, and positive shock has a greater impact than negative shock. At the same time, the findings also reveal that economic growth and globalization enhance, while human capital negatively affects income inequality in Singapore. These findings strengthen the belief of Singapore policy-makers and recommend several significant lessons for developing countries to promote tourism, sustainable development, and reduce income inequality.

According to a survey conducted by Ipsos on predictions for global issues in 2020, ** percent of Singaporeans believed it was likely that women would be paid the same amount as men for the same work in that year. This should not be surprising, as the gender pay gap in Singapore has changed little in the past few years. In 2018, men on average still earned significantly higher salaries than women in Singapore.

Income inequality is an essential cause of violence, stagnant development, and political instability. This study will examine the positive and negative shocks in tourism development, and the distribution of the interaction between tourism development, economic growth, human capital, globalization, and income inequality will be discussed in Singapore, a developed and top-visited country. By adopting autoregressive distributed lag and non-linear autoregressive distributed lag approaches for panel data from 1978 to 2022, the results indicate an asymmetric cointegration among variables, and positive and negative changes in tourism development lead to decreased income inequality. More specifically, the asymmetric effect of tourism is found both in the short- and long-term, and positive shock has a greater impact than negative shock. At the same time, the findings also reveal that economic growth and globalization enhance, while human capital negatively affects income inequality in Singapore. These findings strengthen the belief of Singapore policy-makers and recommend several significant lessons for developing countries to promote tourism, sustainable development, and reduce income inequality.

When asked about possible reasons for why the gender pay gap exists, ** percent of respondents in Singapore stated that fewer leadership positions offered to a particular gender most likely contributed to the gender pay gap. The same survey also found that the majority of the respondents could not correctly identify what a gender pay gap is, which is when one gender is being paid lesser on average than another.

Dataset from Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth. For more information, visit https://data.gov.sg/datasets/d_2fdf410a356b37fe39bdbc3156b7e700/view

Singapour: Gini income inequality index: Pour cet indicateur, La Banque mondiale fournit des données pour la Singapour de à . La valeur moyenne pour Singapour pendant cette période était de index points avec un minimum de index points en et un maximum de index points en .

Income inequality is an essential cause of violence, stagnant development, and political instability. This study will examine the positive and negative shocks in tourism development, and the distribution of the interaction between tourism development, economic growth, human capital, globalization, and income inequality will be discussed in Singapore, a developed and top-visited country. By adopting autoregressive distributed lag and non-linear autoregressive distributed lag approaches for panel data from 1978 to 2022, the results indicate an asymmetric cointegration among variables, and positive and negative changes in tourism development lead to decreased income inequality. More specifically, the asymmetric effect of tourism is found both in the short- and long-term, and positive shock has a greater impact than negative shock. At the same time, the findings also reveal that economic growth and globalization enhance, while human capital negatively affects income inequality in Singapore. These findings strengthen the belief of Singapore policy-makers and recommend several significant lessons for developing countries to promote tourism, sustainable development, and reduce income inequality.

Singapore SG: GDP: 2015 Price: USD: Adjusted Net National Income data was reported at 239.432 USD bn in 2015. Singapore SG: GDP: 2015 Price: USD: Adjusted Net National Income data is updated yearly, averaging 239.432 USD bn from Dec 2015 (Median) to 2015, with 1 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 239.432 USD bn in 2015 and a record low of 239.432 USD bn in 2015. Singapore SG: GDP: 2015 Price: USD: Adjusted Net National Income data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Singapore – Table SG.World Bank.WDI: Gross Domestic Product: Real. Adjusted net national income is GNI minus consumption of fixed capital and natural resources depletion.;World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's 'The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium' (2011).;Gap-filled total;

Key Dates of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Survey Data Collection.

Effects of Remote Work Arrangements on Hourly Wage, Monthly Income, and Monthly Work Hours.

In 2023, the mean monthly earnings for a female employee was around ***** Singapore dollars, while that for a male employee was about ***** Singapore dollars. Although the earnings for both males and females had increased, the gap between the mean monthly employees have not been decreased in the past ten years.

In 2020, other retail accounted for ** percent of gross rental incomes in shopping malls, the highest value in the distribution. Food and beverage outlets accounted for ** percent of gross rental income. Food and beverage outlets have become an important source of rental income for shopping malls as more consumers are turning to online channels for non-food and beverage purchases.

Portugal, Canada, and the United States were the countries with the highest house price to income ratio in 2024. In all three countries, the index exceeded 130 index points, while the average for all OECD countries stood at 116.2 index points. The index measures the development of housing affordability and is calculated by dividing nominal house price by nominal disposable income per head, with 2015 set as a base year when the index amounted to 100. An index value of 120, for example, would mean that house price growth has outpaced income growth by 20 percent since 2015. How have house prices worldwide changed since the COVID-19 pandemic? House prices started to rise gradually after the global financial crisis (2007–2008), but this trend accelerated with the pandemic. The countries with advanced economies, which usually have mature housing markets, experienced stronger growth than countries with emerging economies. Real house price growth (accounting for inflation) peaked in 2022 and has since lost some of the gain. Although, many countries experienced a decline in house prices, the global house price index shows that property prices in 2023 were still substantially higher than before COVID-19. Renting vs. buying In the past, house prices have grown faster than rents. However, the home affordability has been declining notably, with a direct impact on rental prices. As people struggle to buy a property of their own, they often turn to rental accommodation. This has resulted in a growing demand for rental apartments and soaring rental prices.

In 2025, Luxembourg was the country with the highest gross domestic product per capita in the world. Of the 20 listed countries, 13 are in Europe and five are in Asia, alongside the U.S. and Australia. There are no African or Latin American countries among the top 20. Correlation with high living standards While GDP is a useful indicator for measuring the size or strength of an economy, GDP per capita is much more reflective of living standards. For example, when compared to life expectancy or indices such as the Human Development Index or the World Happiness Report, there is a strong overlap - 14 of the 20 countries on this list are also ranked among the 20 happiest countries in 2024, and all 20 have "very high" HDIs. Misleading metrics? GDP per capita figures, however, can be misleading, and to paint a fuller picture of a country's living standards then one must look at multiple metrics. GDP per capita figures can be skewed by inequalities in wealth distribution, and in countries such as those in the Middle East, a relatively large share of the population lives in poverty while a smaller number live affluent lifestyles.