37 datasets found
  1. Percentage of single mother households in the U.S. 2021, by state

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 5, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Percentage of single mother households in the U.S. 2021, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/242302/percentage-of-single-mother-households-in-the-us-by-state/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 5, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2021
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This graph shows the Percentage of households led by a female householder with no spouse present with own children under 18 years living in the household in the U.S. in 2021, by state. In 2021, about 4.24 percent of Californian households were single mother households with at least one child.

    Additional information on single mother households and poverty in the United States

    For most single mothers a constant battle persists between finding the time and energy to raise their children and the demands of working to supply an income to house and feed their families. The pressures of a single income and the high costs of childcare mean that the risk of poverty for these families is a tragic reality. Comparison of the overall United States poverty rate since 1990 with that of the poverty rate for families with a female householder shows that poverty is much more prevalent in the latter. In 2021, while the overall rate was at 11.6 percent, the rate of poverty for single mother families was 23 percent. Moreover, the degree of fluctuation tends to be lower for single female household families, suggesting the rate of poverty for these groups is less affected by economic conditions.

    The sharp rise in the number of children living with a single mother or single father in the United States from 1970 to 2022 suggests more must be done to ensure that families in such situations are able to avoid poverty. Moreover, attention should also be placed on overall racial income inequality given the higher rate of poverty for Hispanic single mother families than their white or Asian counterparts.

  2. Number of single parent families in Canada 2008-2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Jan 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Number of single parent families in Canada 2008-2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/443342/single-parent-families-in-canada/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 23, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    In 2024, the total number of single parent families in Canada increased by 0.03 million families (+1.66 percent) compared to 2023. With 1.84 million families, the total number thereby reached its highest value in the observed period.

  3. Data from: Iowa Youth and Families Project, 1989-1992

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    ascii, delimited, sas +2
    Updated Nov 3, 2011
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Conger, Rand; Lasley, Paul; Lorenz, Frederick O.; Simons, Ronald; Whitbeck, Les B.; Elder Jr., Glen H.; Norem, Rosalie (2011). Iowa Youth and Families Project, 1989-1992 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26721.v2
    Explore at:
    spss, ascii, sas, stata, delimitedAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 3, 2011
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    Conger, Rand; Lasley, Paul; Lorenz, Frederick O.; Simons, Ronald; Whitbeck, Les B.; Elder Jr., Glen H.; Norem, Rosalie
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/26721/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/26721/terms

    Time period covered
    1989 - 1992
    Area covered
    Iowa, United States
    Description

    This data collection contains the first four waves of the Iowa Youth and Families Project (IYFP), conducted in 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992. The Iowa Youth and Families Project was developed from an initial sample of 451 7th graders from two-parent families in rural Iowa. The study was merged with the Iowa Single Parent Project (ISPP) to form the Iowa Family Transitions Project in 1994, when the target youth were seniors in high school. Survey data were collected from the target child (7th grader), a sibling within four years of age of the target child, and both parents. Field interviewers visited families at their homes on several occasions to administer questionnaires and videotape interaction tasks including family discussion tasks, family problem-solving tasks, sibling interaction tasks, and marital interaction tasks. The Household Data files contain information about the family's financial situation, involvement in farming, and demographic information about household members. The Parent and the Child Survey Data files contain responses to survey questions about the quality and stability of family relationships, emotional, physical, and behavioral problems of individual family members, parent-child conflict, family problem-solving skills, social and financial support from outside the home, traumatic life experiences, alcohol, drug, and tobacco use, and opinions on topics such as abortion, parenting, and gender roles. In addition, the Child Survey Data files include responses collected from the target child and his or her sibling in the study about experiences with puberty, dating, sexual activity, and risk-taking behavior. The Problem-Solving Data files contain survey data collected from respondents about the family interactions tasks. The Observational Data files contain the interviewers' observations collected during these tasks. Demographic variables include sex, age, employment status, occupation, income, home ownership, religious preference, frequency of religious attendance, as well as the ages and sex of all household members and their relationship to the head of household. Demographic information collected on the parents also includes their birth order within their family, the ages and political philosophy of their parents, the sex, age, education level, and occupation of their siblings, and the country of origin of their ancestors.

  4. W

    Lone parent households with dependent children

    • cloud.csiss.gmu.edu
    • data.europa.eu
    • +1more
    html
    Updated Dec 20, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United Kingdom (2019). Lone parent households with dependent children [Dataset]. https://cloud.csiss.gmu.edu/uddi/dataset/lone_parent_households_with_dependent_children
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 20, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    United Kingdom
    License

    http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/open-government-licencehttp://reference.data.gov.uk/id/open-government-licence

    Description

    A lone parent is defined as a parent with a dependent child living in a household with no other people (whether related to that dependent child or not). Source: Census 2001 Publisher: Neighbourhood Statistics Geographies: Output Area (OA), Lower Layer Super Output Area (LSOA), Middle Layer Super Output Area (MSOA), Ward, Local Authority District (LAD), Government Office Region (GOR), National Geographic coverage: England and Wales Time coverage: 2001 Type of data: Survey (census)

  5. d

    Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Administrative Data Series

    • catalog.data.gov
    • healthdata.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Jul 4, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ACF (2025). Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Administrative Data Series [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/child-care-and-development-fund-ccdf-administrative-data-series
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 4, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    ACF
    Description

    This administrative dataset provides descriptive information about the families and children served through the federal Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF). CCDF dollars are provided to states, territories, and tribes to provide assistance to low-income families receiving or in transition from temporary public assistance, to obtain quality child care so they can work, or depending on their state's policy, to attend training or receive education. The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 requires states and territories to collect information on all family units receiving assistance through the CCDF and to submit monthly case-level data to the Office of Child Care. States are permitted to report case-level data for the entire population, or a sample of the population, under approved sampling guidelines. The Summary Records file contains monthly state-level summary information including the number of families served. The Family Records file contains family-level data including single parent status of the head of household, monthly co-payment amount, date on which child care assistance began, reasons for care (e.g., employment, training/education, protective services, etc.), income used to determine eligibility, source of income, and the family size on which eligibility is based. The Child Records file contains child-level data including ethnicity, race, and date of birth. The Setting Records file contains information about the type of child care setting, the total amount paid to the provider, and the total number of hours of care received by the child. The Pooling Factor file provides state-level data on the percentage of child care funds that is provided through the CCDF, the federal Head Start region the grantee (state) is in and is monitored by, and the state FIPS code for the grantee. Units of Response: United States and Territories, CCDF Family Recipients, CCDF Children Recipients Type of Data: Administrative Tribal Data: No Periodicity: Annual Demographic Indicators: Ethnicity;Household Income;Household Size;Race SORN: Not Applicable Data Use Agreement: Not Applicable Data Use Agreement Location: https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/rpxlogin Granularity: Family;Individual Spatial: United States Geocoding: Tribe

  6. f

    Table_1_From Offline to Online: Understanding Chinese Single Mothers’...

    • figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kai Kuang; Xiaoman Zhao; Iccha Basnyat; Tianping He (2023). Table_1_From Offline to Online: Understanding Chinese Single Mothers’ Uncertainty Management in Interpersonal and Online Contexts.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.845760.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Kai Kuang; Xiaoman Zhao; Iccha Basnyat; Tianping He
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Divorced and unwed single motherhood is heavily stigmatized in Chinese cultural context, preventing Chinese single mothers from actively seeking the information and support needed and negatively impacting their wellbeing. Drawing on the theory of motivated information management (TMIM), this study tested how perceived stigma and cultural norms influenced Chinese single mothers’ search for information and social support from families, friends as well as from online communities. Using two-wave data collected from 226 single mothers, findings support the utility of the TMIM in explaining information management and support seeking behaviors and contribute to situating the TMIM process within larger socio-cultural contexts. Practical implications regarding how to facilitate more effective uncertainty management and enhance Chinese single mothers’ wellbeing in interpersonal vs. online contexts are discussed.

  7. a

    COVID-19 Government support and benefits of family units with two children...

    • hamiltondatacatalog-mcmaster.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 23, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    koke_McMaster (2024). COVID-19 Government support and benefits of family units with two children 2020-2021 [Dataset]. https://hamiltondatacatalog-mcmaster.hub.arcgis.com/items/5c56b3f7ead145cf9857d41bd0fb203f
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 23, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    koke_McMaster
    Description

    COVID-19 - Government income support and benefits of census family units by census family type and number of children (1, 2, 3, 4)Frequency: OccasionalTable: 11-10-0100-01Release date: 2023-07-12Geography: Canada, Province or territory, Census metropolitan area, Census agglomeration, Census metropolitan area part, Census agglomeration partFootnotes: 1 The data source for this table is the final version of the T1 Family File, created by the Centre for Income and Socio-Economic Well-being Statistics of Statistics Canada. Because they are based on a different methodology, estimates of the number of individuals and census families presented in this table differ from estimates produced by the Centre for Demography. Information on the data source, the historical availability, definitions of the terms used, and the geographies available can be found at https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/72-212-X" rel="external noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"> Technical Reference Guide for the Annual Income Estimates for Census Families2 This table should only be used in conjunction with income statistics produced using the T1 Family File. Because the counts available in this table are based on a different methodology, the family and person counts will differ from estimates produced by the Centre for Demography.3 COVID Benefits are benefits provided by the federal and provincial government during the pandemic to support individuals and families in 2020. More information is available from the https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/72-212-X" rel="external noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"> Technical Reference Guide for the Annual Income Estimates for Census Families4 Statistics are calculated based on families who received COVID benefits only.5 The Census Standard Geographical Classification (SGC) is used for data dissemination of the census metropolitan areas and the census agglomerations: from 2016 to 2020, SGC 2016; as of 2021, SGC 2021. 6 Census families are comprised of: 1) couples (married or common-law, including same-sex couples) living in the same dwelling with or without children, and 2) single parents (male or female) living with one or more children. Persons who are not matched to a family become persons not in census families. They may be living alone, with a family to whom they are related, with a family to whom they are unrelated or with other persons not in census families.7 A couple family consists of a couple living together (married or common-law, including same-sex couples) living at the same address with or without children.8 A lone-parent family is a family with only one parent, male or female, and with at least one child.9 A person not in census families is an individual who is not part of a census family, couple family or lone-parent family. Persons not in census families may live with their married children or with their children who have children of their own. They may be living with a family to whom they are related or unrelated. They may also be living alone or with other non-family persons.10 Children are tax filers or imputed persons in couple and lone-parent families. Tax filing children do not live with their spouse, have no children of their own and live with their parent(s). Most children are identified from the Canada Child Tax Benefit file, a provincial births file or a previous T1 family file.11 Median is the middle number in a group of numbers. Where a median income, for example, is given as $26,000, it means that exactly half of the incomes reported are greater than or equal to $26,000, and that the other half is less than or equal to the median amount. 12 Total income is income from all sources. As of 2020, COVID-19 - Government income support and benefits are included in income estimates. A detailed definition of what is included in total income is available from the Technical Reference Guide for the Preliminary Estimates from the T1 Family File (T1FF) - opens in a new browser window."

  8. d

    109-year service unit for single-parent families in Yilan County

    • data.gov.tw
    csv, json, xml
    Updated Jul 18, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Yiland County Government (2025). 109-year service unit for single-parent families in Yilan County [Dataset]. https://data.gov.tw/en/datasets/134371
    Explore at:
    csv, xml, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 18, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Yiland County Government
    License

    https://data.gov.tw/licensehttps://data.gov.tw/license

    Area covered
    Yilan County
    Description

    109 Yilan County Social Welfare Related Information

  9. Child Care and Development Fund Administrative Data, Federal Fiscal Year...

    • childandfamilydataarchive.org
    ascii, delimited, r +3
    Updated Mar 24, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United States Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Child Care (2022). Child Care and Development Fund Administrative Data, Federal Fiscal Year 2013 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36466.v3
    Explore at:
    r, spss, sas, delimited, stata, asciiAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 24, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    United States Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Child Care
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/36466/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/36466/terms

    Area covered
    Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, Virgin Islands of the United States, United States
    Description

    This administrative dataset provides descriptive information about the families and children served through the federal Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF). CCDF dollars are provided to states, territories, and tribes to provide assistance to low-income families receiving or in transition from temporary public assistance, to obtain quality child care so they can work, or depending on their state's policy, to attend training or receive education. The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 requires states and territories to collect information on all family units receiving assistance through the CCDF and to submit monthly case-level data to the Office of Child Care. States are permitted to report case-level data for the entire population, or a sample of the population, under approved sampling guidelines. The Summary Records file contains monthly state-level summary information including the number of families served. The Family Records file contains family-level data including single parent status of the head of household, monthly co-payment amount, date on which child care assistance began, reasons for care (e.g., employment, training/education, protective services, etc.), income used to determine eligibility, source of income, and the family size on which eligibility is based. The Child Records file contains child-level data including ethnicity, race, gender, and date of birth. The Setting Records file contains information about the type of child care setting, the total amount paid to the provider, and the total number of hours of care received by the child. The Pooling Factor file provides state-level data on the percentage of child care funds that is provided through the CCDF, the federal Head Start region the grantee (state) is in and is monitored by, and the state FIPS code for the grantee.

  10. W

    CD578 - Family Units in Private Households with Lone Parents with Children...

    • cloud.csiss.gmu.edu
    • data.wu.ac.at
    json-stat, px
    Updated Jun 20, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ireland (2019). CD578 - Family Units in Private Households with Lone Parents with Children (Number) by Type of Family Unit, Number of children, CensusYear and Detailed Marital Status [Dataset]. https://cloud.csiss.gmu.edu/uddi/dataset/ith-children-number-by-type-of-family-unit-number-of-children-censusyear-and-detailed-marital-s
    Explore at:
    json-stat, pxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 20, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    Ireland
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Family Units in Private Households with Lone Parents with Children (Number) by Type of Family Unit, Number of children, CensusYear and Detailed Marital Status

    View data using web pages

    Download .px file (Software required)

  11. o

    Data from: National Survey of Families and Households, Wave 1: 1987-1988,...

    • explore.openaire.eu
    • icpsr.umich.edu
    Updated Jan 1, 1994
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Larry L. Bumpass; James A. Sweet; Vaughn R.A. Call (1994). National Survey of Families and Households, Wave 1: 1987-1988, [United States] [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/icpsr06041.v2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 1, 1994
    Authors
    Larry L. Bumpass; James A. Sweet; Vaughn R.A. Call
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The National Survey of Families and Households (NSFH), Wave 1 (1987-1988) is the first of three waves in a longitudinal survey that was designed to study the causes and consequences of changes happening in families and households within the United States. At a time when the range of family structures was becoming more and more diverse, this study permitted a close examination of the resulting family compositions and household operations. One adult per household was randomly selected as the primary respondent, and there was a total of 13,007 respondents. In addition to the main interview conducted with the primary respondent, a shorter, self-administered questionnaire was given to the spouse or cohabitating partner, and also administered to the householder if he or she was a relative of the primary respondent. A considerable amount of life-history information was collected, such as the respondent's family living arrangements in childhood, departures and returns to the parental home, and histories of marriage, separation, divorce, cohabitation, adoption, child custody arrangements, and stepfamily relations. Respondents were also asked about the relationship of household members to each other and the quality of their relationships with their parents, children, and in-laws. Information on economic well-being was also collected, including earnings from wages, self-employment income, interest, dividends, investments, pensions, Social Security, public assistance, and child support/alimony. Demographic information collected includes sex, age, marital status, education, and employment. The National Survey of Families and Households main sample was a national, multi-stage area probability sample containing about 17,000 housing units drawn from 100 sampling areas in the 48 contiguous states in the U.S. Wave one had 13,017 respondents, of which 10 invalid/duplicate cases were removed, for a final total of 13,007 respondents. The sample included a main cross-section sample of 9,643 households. The oversample of blacks, Puerto Ricans, Mexican Americans, single-parent families and families with stepchildren, cohabiting couples and recently married was accomplished by doubling the number of households selected within the 100 sampling areas. For more information on sampling, please see Appendix L: National Survey of Families and Households: A Sampling Report within the P.I. Codebook. face-to-face interview; self-enumerated questionnaireTwo percent of the interviews were conducted in Spanish.Fieldwork for Wave 1 of the National Survey of Families and Households was completed by the Institute for Survey Research at Temple UniversityThe second and third waves of NSFH can be accessed by visiting ICPSR 6906 and ICPSR 171 respectively.For additional information on the National Survey of Families and Households, please visit the NSFH Web site. This study has been undertaken explicitly to provide a data resource for the research community at large and was designed with advice from a large number of consultants and correspondents. The substantive coverage has been kept broad to permit the holistic analysis of family experience from an array of theoretical perspectives. Non-institutionalized, English or Spanish speaking population aged 19 and older, living in households within the United States. Smallest Geographic Unit: Region The data are not weighted, however, this study contains three weight variables (SAMWT, AWEIGHT, and SPWEIGHT) that should be used in any analysis. Datasets: DS1: National Survey of Families and Households, Wave 1: 1987-1988, [United States] The study design is cross-sectional, with several retrospective sequences. Response Rates: 74.3%

  12. a

    COVID-19 - Government support and benefits of family units with one child,...

    • hamiltondatacatalog-mcmaster.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 23, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    koke_McMaster (2024). COVID-19 - Government support and benefits of family units with one child, 2020-2021 [Dataset]. https://hamiltondatacatalog-mcmaster.hub.arcgis.com/maps/772b300d6d924c039e43db8b099dff16_0/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 23, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    koke_McMaster
    Description

    COVID-19 - Government income support and benefits of census family units by census family type and number of children (1, 2, 3, 4)Frequency: OccasionalTable: 11-10-0100-01Release date: 2023-07-12Geography: Canada, Province or territory, Census metropolitan area, Census agglomeration, Census metropolitan area part, Census agglomeration partFootnotes: 1 The data source for this table is the final version of the T1 Family File, created by the Centre for Income and Socio-Economic Well-being Statistics of Statistics Canada. Because they are based on a different methodology, estimates of the number of individuals and census families presented in this table differ from estimates produced by the Centre for Demography. Information on the data source, the historical availability, definitions of the terms used, and the geographies available can be found at https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/72-212-X" rel="external noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"> Technical Reference Guide for the Annual Income Estimates for Census Families2 This table should only be used in conjunction with income statistics produced using the T1 Family File. Because the counts available in this table are based on a different methodology, the family and person counts will differ from estimates produced by the Centre for Demography.3 COVID Benefits are benefits provided by the federal and provincial government during the pandemic to support individuals and families in 2020. More information is available from the https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/72-212-X" rel="external noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"> Technical Reference Guide for the Annual Income Estimates for Census Families4 Statistics are calculated based on families who received COVID benefits only.5 The Census Standard Geographical Classification (SGC) is used for data dissemination of the census metropolitan areas and the census agglomerations: from 2016 to 2020, SGC 2016; as of 2021, SGC 2021. 6 Census families are comprised of: 1) couples (married or common-law, including same-sex couples) living in the same dwelling with or without children, and 2) single parents (male or female) living with one or more children. Persons who are not matched to a family become persons not in census families. They may be living alone, with a family to whom they are related, with a family to whom they are unrelated or with other persons not in census families.7 A couple family consists of a couple living together (married or common-law, including same-sex couples) living at the same address with or without children.8 A lone-parent family is a family with only one parent, male or female, and with at least one child.9 A person not in census families is an individual who is not part of a census family, couple family or lone-parent family. Persons not in census families may live with their married children or with their children who have children of their own. They may be living with a family to whom they are related or unrelated. They may also be living alone or with other non-family persons.10 Children are tax filers or imputed persons in couple and lone-parent families. Tax filing children do not live with their spouse, have no children of their own and live with their parent(s). Most children are identified from the Canada Child Tax Benefit file, a provincial births file or a previous T1 family file.11 Median is the middle number in a group of numbers. Where a median income, for example, is given as $26,000, it means that exactly half of the incomes reported are greater than or equal to $26,000, and that the other half is less than or equal to the median amount. 12 Total income is income from all sources. As of 2020, COVID-19 - Government income support and benefits are included in income estimates. A detailed definition of what is included in total income is available from the Technical Reference Guide for the Preliminary Estimates from the T1 Family File (T1FF) - opens in a new browser window."

  13. r

    PHIDU - Families (PHA) 2016

    • researchdata.edu.au
    null
    Updated Jun 28, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Torrens University Australia - Public Health Information Development Unit (2023). PHIDU - Families (PHA) 2016 [Dataset]. https://researchdata.edu.au/phidu-families-pha-2016/2743944
    Explore at:
    nullAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 28, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Australian Urban Research Infrastructure Network (AURIN)
    Authors
    Torrens University Australia - Public Health Information Development Unit
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset, released December 2017, contains family statistics relating to Single parent families with children aged less than 15 years, 2016; Jobless families with children aged less than 15 years, 2016; Children aged less than 15 years in jobless families, 2016; Children in families where the mother has low educational attainment, 2016. The data is by Population Health Area (PHA) 2016 geographic boundaries based on the 2016 Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS).

    Population Health Areas, developed by PHIDU, are comprised of a combination of whole SA2s and multiple (aggregates of) SA2s, where the SA2 is an area in the ABS structure.

    For more information please see the data source notes on the data.

    Source: Compiled by PHIDU based on the ABS Census of Population and Housing, August 2016; the ABS Census of Population and Housing, August 2016 (unpublished) data.

    AURIN has spatially enabled the original data. Data that was not shown/not applicable/not published/not available for the specific area ('#', '..', '^', 'np, 'n.a.', 'n.y.a.' in original PHIDU data) was removed.It has been replaced by by Blank cells. For other keys and abbreviations refer to PHIDU Keys.

  14. c

    Change and Development of Forms of Family Life in West Germany (Survey of...

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • search.gesis.org
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 14, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Deutsches Jugendinstitut (DJI), München (2023). Change and Development of Forms of Family Life in West Germany (Survey of Families) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.2245
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 14, 2023
    Authors
    Deutsches Jugendinstitut (DJI), München
    Time period covered
    Aug 1988 - Dec 1988
    Area covered
    Germany
    Measurement technique
    Oral survey with standardized questionnaire
    Description

    Current partner relations and partner relation in the course of one´s life up to now. Family relations in the framework of the social network. Education and employment biography.

    Topics: 1. Children: number of siblings; growing up with both parents or with a single parent; divorced parents in childhood; education and occupational training of father and mother; educational goals; number of children or desire for children; detailed information on date of birth, sex, status, place of stay, school attendance, vocational training, attendance at a kindergarten and child care after school for every individual child; desired number of children; living together with a partner; living separately; right to support or personal obligations to pay; regularity of payments deposited.

    1. Partner biography: steady partnership; detailed information for every partnership regarding: time of getting to know each other, start of actual partnership, start of living together in a residence, number of common children, age difference from partner, marital status and school degree of partner, differences in religious denomination and citizenship, marriage and continued existence of partner relation, time of termination of the relation.

    2. Questions on social net: person to confide in; reference person; description of the persons of the social network; persons with whom regular common meals are taken and to whom emotional relations exist; persons from whom financial support is received or to whom given; leisure partner; secondary residence; sex, type of relation, distance to residence and frequency of contact with persons of one´s social surroundings; number of siblings, number of grandchildren as well as number of grandparents on the part of respondent and for spouse.

    3. School, training and employment: school degree and year of school degree; occupational training; time of first taking up an occupational activity and if appropriate ending occupational activity; number of hours each week at the beginning of employment life and change in number of hours each week; detailed information on reason and time period of interruptions of employment; current employment status; search for employment; arrangement of working hours; flextime; extent of self-determination in work or working according to instructions; limited work contract; most important criteria and demands of an occupation; attitude to extent of employment of men and women in various life cycles or family stages; information on employment status, occupational position and arrangement of working hours of partner/spouse; distribution of tasks in household; employment of cleaning help; decision distribution with selected tasks in one´s family; characterization of partner relation (scale); attitude to marriage (scale); estimated weekly effort for activities for family and household; attitude to children (scale); religiousness; postmaterialism; frequency of selected leisure activities; residential status; living in a group sharing a residence; living space; number of rooms; number of children´s rooms; information on infrastructure available in one´s residential area; use of these infrastructure facilities; presence and use of facilities for children in the immediate vicinity of one´s residence; sources of income of household; rights to support for the children; regularity of payments for the child; occurrence of burdensome events and problems in the last 12 months and the stress perceived from this; looking after persons in need of care in household; family relation with this person and number of hours expended weekly for this; support with care from social services; self-assessment of condition of health; sex; age in years and months.

    After conclusion of the survey a questionnaire on the use of contraceptives was distributed to be filled out in writing: regular use of contraceptives; partner deciding on the use of contraceptives; reasons for non-use of contraceptives.

    Also encoded was: information on reasons for refusal to respond; place of interview; date of interview.

  15. d

    Survey of Consumer Finances, 1974 [Canada]: Economic Family Income

    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Dec 28, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statistics Canada. Household Surveys Division (2023). Survey of Consumer Finances, 1974 [Canada]: Economic Family Income [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/CJG3QS
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 28, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Borealis
    Authors
    Statistics Canada. Household Surveys Division
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1973 - Dec 31, 1973
    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    The Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) is conducted annually to obtain work experience and income information from Canadian households. The Survey provides up-to-date information on the distribution and sources of income, before and after taxes, for families and individuals. With this file, users may identify specific family types, such as two-parent and lone-parent families. Information is also provided on earnings, transfers, and total income for the head and the spouse of the census family unit, as well as personal and labour-related characteristics. This reference year for this file is 1973. Commencing with the 1998 microdata files, annual cross-sectional income data will be sourced from the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (SLID).

  16. C

    Pittsburgh American Community Survey Data 2015 - Household Types

    • data.wprdc.org
    • catalog.data.gov
    • +1more
    csv
    Updated May 21, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Pittsburgh (2023). Pittsburgh American Community Survey Data 2015 - Household Types [Dataset]. https://data.wprdc.org/dataset/pittsburgh-american-community-survey-data-household-types
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 21, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    City of Pittsburgh
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Pittsburgh
    Description

    The data on relationship to householder were derived from answers to Question 2 in the 2015 American Community Survey (ACS), which was asked of all people in housing units. The question on relationship is essential for classifying the population information on families and other groups. Information about changes in the composition of the American family, from the number of people living alone to the number of children living with only one parent, is essential for planning and carrying out a number of federal programs.

    The responses to this question were used to determine the relationships of all persons to the householder, as well as household type (married couple family, nonfamily, etc.). From responses to this question, we were able to determine numbers of related children, own children, unmarried partner households, and multi-generational households. We calculated average household and family size. When relationship was not reported, it was imputed using the age difference between the householder and the person, sex, and marital status.

    Household – A household includes all the people who occupy a housing unit. (People not living in households are classified as living in group quarters.) A housing unit is a house, an apartment, a mobile home, a group of rooms, or a single room that is occupied (or if vacant, is intended for occupancy) as separate living quarters. Separate living quarters are those in which the occupants live separately from any other people in the building and which have direct access from the outside of the building or through a common hall. The occupants may be a single family, one person living alone, two or more families living together, or any other group of related or unrelated people who share living arrangements.

    Average Household Size – A measure obtained by dividing the number of people in households by the number of households. In cases where people in households are cross-classified by race or Hispanic origin, people in the household are classified by the race or Hispanic origin of the householder rather than the race or Hispanic origin of each individual.

    Average household size is rounded to the nearest hundredth.

    Comparability – The relationship categories for the most part can be compared to previous ACS years and to similar data collected in the decennial census, CPS, and SIPP. With the change in 2008 from “In-law” to the two categories of “Parent-in-law” and “Son-in-law or daughter-in-law,” caution should be exercised when comparing data on in-laws from previous years. “In-law” encompassed any type of in-law such as sister-in-law. Combining “Parent-in-law” and “son-in-law or daughter-in-law” does not represent all “in-laws” in 2008.

    The same can be said of comparing the three categories of “biological” “step,” and “adopted” child in 2008 to “Child” in previous years. Before 2008, respondents may have considered anyone under 18 as “child” and chosen that category. The ACS includes “foster child” as a category. However, the 2010 Census did not contain this category, and “foster children” were included in the “Other nonrelative” category. Therefore, comparison of “foster child” cannot be made to the 2010 Census. Beginning in 2013, the “spouse” category includes same-sex spouses.

  17. National Survey of Children's Exposure to Violence I, 1990-2008 [United...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • icpsr.umich.edu
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2025). National Survey of Children's Exposure to Violence I, 1990-2008 [United States] [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/national-survey-of-childrens-exposure-to-violence-i-1990-2008-united-states-1c410
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Preventionhttp://ojjdp.gov/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The National Survey of Children's Exposure to Violence (NatSCEV) series involved three rounds of data collection, this study NatSCEV I (baseline), NatSCEV II, and NatSCEV III. For more information on other parts to the series, please use the following links: NatSCEV II (ICPSR 36177) - http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36177.v1 NatSCEV III (ICPSR 36523) - http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36523.v1 The National Survey of Children's Exposure to Violence I was designed to obtain lifetime and one-year incidence estimates of a comprehensive range of childhood victimizations across gender, race, and developmental stage. Conducted between January and July, 2008, it assessed the experiences of a nationally representative sample of 4,549 children aged 1 month to 17 years living in the contiguous United States (excluding New Hampshire). The primary sample of households was selected from a nationwide sampling frame of residential telephone numbers by random digit dialing (RDD). A second sample was drawn by over-sampling United States telephone exchanges that had a population of 70 percent or more of African American, Hispanic, or low-income households. A short interview was conducted with an adult caregiver (usually a parent) to obtain family demographic information. One child was randomly selected from all eligible children in a household by selecting the child with the most recent birthday. The survey used an enhanced version of the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire (JVQ), an inventory of childhood victimization. This version of the JVQ obtains reports on 48 forms of offenses against youth that cover five general areas of concern including: conventional crime, child maltreatment, peer and sibling victimization, sexual assault, and witnessing and indirect victimization. Follow-up questions for each victimization item gathered additional information about the victimization incident. The data set has 1,824 variables and 4,549 cases.

  18. g

    Information on state social standards and guarantees in 2021-2022 |...

    • gimi9.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Information on state social standards and guarantees in 2021-2022 | gimi9.com [Dataset]. https://gimi9.com/dataset/eu_7ae70849-d46b-45a3-a4fc-e66637a69cf6/
    Explore at:
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Information on state social standards and guarantees, in the calculation to the subsistence minimum (PM): subsistence minimum, minimum wage, minimum pension, burial allowance for workers and members of their families, assistance to internally displaced persons, assistance at the birth of a child, assistance for children to single mothers, state social assistance to low-income families and other benefits

  19. National Survey of America's Families (NSAF), 1997

    • childandfamilydataarchive.org
    ascii, sas, spss +1
    Updated Oct 4, 2007
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] (2007). National Survey of America's Families (NSAF), 1997 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04581.v1
    Explore at:
    spss, stata, sas, asciiAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 4, 2007
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/4581/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/4581/terms

    Time period covered
    Jan 1997 - Nov 1997
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The National Survey of America's Families (NSAF) is a household survey that provides a comprehensive look at quantitative measures of the well-being of children, adults, and their families. While the focus of the survey is at the state level, the scope is national -- with a primary emphasis on low-income families. NSAF information was gathered from interviews conducted with the Most Knowledgeable Adult (MKA), the person in the household who was most knowledgeable about the questions being asked about the respondent, their spouse/partner (if applicable) and the focal child (or children). Data were collected from more than 40,000 families in two stages. First, a screener interview was administered to determine whether a household was eligible to complete the second, extended interview. Two types of extended interviews were administered. Option A interviews were used in households with children under age 18. Option B interviews were used in childless adult households and also with emancipated minors. The extended interview was divided into several sections and is labeled A through P below:

    A. Student Status. This section contained two questions that asked whether the respondent was a student and whether that household was the respondent's usual residence. B. Health Status and Satisfaction. These questions asked about the respondent's satisfaction with health care, access to health care, the health status of the focal children, and the health status of the respondent. C. Parent/Child/Family Interaction and Education. This series of questions asked about education for focal children. Questions addressed the focal child's current grade (or the last grade completed) and the child's attitudes toward school and schoolwork, skipping school, suspensions, and changing schools. Questions were also asked about children over 11 years old working for pay and attending summer school. D. Household Roster. In this section, the name, age, and sex of all persons living in the household were recorded, and relationships between all household members were investigated. E. Health Care Coverage. Information was gathered about current health insurance coverage for the respondent, the respondent's spouse/partner, and the focal children. Questions were also asked about characteristics of that coverage and of periods in which family members had no insurance coverage. F. Health Care Use and Access. This section gathered information about health status, health care services received, and necessary health care services that were postponed during the preceding 12 months. Questions on routine care, overnight stays in hospitals, dental care, mental health care, women's health care, well-child care, and prescription medicines were also included. G. Child Care. In this section, respondents were queried as to child care arrangements including Head Start, child care centers, before- or after-school care, and babysitters. Questions were asked about the total number of hours per week in each care situation, the typical number of children cared for, the typical number of adult child care providers, and child care costs. H. Nonresidential Parent/Father. These questions determined whether a focal child had a nonresident parent, how often the child saw his/her nonresident parent, whether the nonresident parent provided financial support, and whether nonresident parents were required by child support orders to provide financial support. I. Employment and Earnings. This section contained a series of questions about the employment and earnings of the respondent and the spouse/partnerfor the current and preceding year. Topics included employment status, occupation, industry, employer-provided health insurance, hours worked, and earnings. Some questions were also asked about the earnings of other family members. J. Family Income. Family income also was identified from a wide variety of sources other than earnings from employment. These sources included public assistance (e.g., Aid to Families with Dependent Children [AFDC], General Assistance, Emergency Assistance, or vouchers), Food Stamps, child support, foster care payments, financial assistance from friends or relatives, unemployment compensation, workers' compensation or veterans' payments, Supplemental Security Income, Social Security, pe

  20. f

    Selection of number of classes for the parents’ generation (G1).

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ingrid Schoon; Gabriella Melis (2023). Selection of number of classes for the parents’ generation (G1). [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214801.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Ingrid Schoon; Gabriella Melis
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Indicators of Model Fit.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2024). Percentage of single mother households in the U.S. 2021, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/242302/percentage-of-single-mother-households-in-the-us-by-state/
Organization logo

Percentage of single mother households in the U.S. 2021, by state

Explore at:
5 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Jul 5, 2024
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
2021
Area covered
United States
Description

This graph shows the Percentage of households led by a female householder with no spouse present with own children under 18 years living in the household in the U.S. in 2021, by state. In 2021, about 4.24 percent of Californian households were single mother households with at least one child.

Additional information on single mother households and poverty in the United States

For most single mothers a constant battle persists between finding the time and energy to raise their children and the demands of working to supply an income to house and feed their families. The pressures of a single income and the high costs of childcare mean that the risk of poverty for these families is a tragic reality. Comparison of the overall United States poverty rate since 1990 with that of the poverty rate for families with a female householder shows that poverty is much more prevalent in the latter. In 2021, while the overall rate was at 11.6 percent, the rate of poverty for single mother families was 23 percent. Moreover, the degree of fluctuation tends to be lower for single female household families, suggesting the rate of poverty for these groups is less affected by economic conditions.

The sharp rise in the number of children living with a single mother or single father in the United States from 1970 to 2022 suggests more must be done to ensure that families in such situations are able to avoid poverty. Moreover, attention should also be placed on overall racial income inequality given the higher rate of poverty for Hispanic single mother families than their white or Asian counterparts.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu