Facebook
TwitterIn 2020, there were approximately **** million large dogs (over ** lbs or over ** kg) in Canadian households as pets. In contrast, small dogs (up to ** lbs or * kg) had a total population of around **** million.
Facebook
TwitterBy len fishman [source]
This dataset provides valuable insights into the potential relationship between size and intelligence in different breeds of dogs. It includes data from a research conducted by Stanley Coren, a professor of canine psychology at the University of British Columbia, as well as breed size data from the American Kennel Club (AKC). With this dataset, users will be able to explore how larger and smaller breeds compare when it comes to obedience and intelligence. The columns present in this dataset include Breed, Classification, Obey (probability that the breed obeys the first command), Repetitions Lower/Upper Limits (for understanding new commands). From examining this data, users may gain further insight on our furry friends and their behaviors. Dive deeper into these intricate relationships with this powerful dataset!
For more datasets, click here.
- 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!
This dataset provides insight into how intelligence and size may be connected in dogs. It includes information on dog breeds, including their size, how well they obey commands, and the number of repetitions required for them to understand new commands. This can help pet owners who are looking for a dog that fits their lifestyle and residential requirements.
To get started using this dataset, begin by exploring the different attributes included: Breed (the type of breed), Classification (the size classification of the dog - small, medium or large), height_low_inches & height_high_inches (these are the lower limit and upper limit in inches when it comes to the height of the breed), weight_low_lbs & weight_high lbs (these are the lower limit and upper limit in pounds when it comes to the weight of a breed). Also included is obey (the probability that a particular breed obeys a given command) as well as reps_lower & reps_upper which represent respectively lower and upper repetitions required for a given breed to understand new commands
Once you have an understanding of what each attribute represents you can start exploring specific questions such as 'how many breeds fit in within certain size categories?', 'what type of 'obey' score do large breeds tend to achieve?', or you could try comparing size with intelligence by plotting out obey against both reps_lower & reps_upper . If higher obedience scores correlate with smaller numbers on either attributes this might suggest that smaller breeds tend require fewer repetitions when attempting learn something new.
By combining these attributes with other datasets such as those focusing on energy levels it’s possible create even more specific metrics based questions regarding which types of dogs might suit certain lifestyles better than others!
- Examining the correlation between obedience and intelligence in different dog breeds.
- Investigating how size is related to other traits such as energy level, sociability and trainability in a particular breed of dog.
- Analyzing which sizes are associated with specific behavior patterns or medical issues for dogs of various breeds
If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source
License: Dataset copyright by authors - You are free to: - Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. - Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. - You must: - Give appropriate credit - Provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. - ShareAlike - You must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. - Keep intact - all notices that refer to this license, including copyright notices.
File: AKC Breed Info.csv | Column name | Description | |:-----------------------|:--------------------------------------------------------------| | Breed | The breed of the dog. (String) | | height_low_inches | The lower range of the height of the dog in inches. (Integer) | | height_high_inches | The upper range of the height of the dog in inches. (Integer) | | weight_low_lbs | The lower range of the weight of the dog in pounds. (Integer) | |...
Facebook
TwitterDemographic data, including sex, age, breed and size for all dogs (n = 3, 298).
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Poor management of dog populations causes many problems in different countries, including rabies. To strategically design a dog population management, certain sets of data are required, such as the population size and spatial distribution of dogs. However, these data are rarely available or incomplete. Hence, this study aimed to describe the characteristics of dog populations in Thailand, explore their spatial distribution and relevant factors, and estimate the number of dogs in the whole country. First, four districts were selected as representatives of each region. Each district was partitioned into grids with a 300-m resolution. The selected grids were then surveyed, and the number of dogs and related data were collected. Random forest models with a two-part approach were used to quantify the association between the surveyed dog population and predictor variables. The spatial distribution of dog populations was then predicted. A total of 1,750 grids were surveyed (945 grids with dog presence and 805 grids with dog absence). Among the surveyed dogs, 86.6% (12,027/13,895) were owned. Of these, 51% were classified as independent, followed by confined (25%), semi-independent (21%), and unidentified dogs (3%). Seventy-two percent (1,348/1,868) of the ownerless dogs were feral, and the rest were community dogs. The spatial pattern of the dog populations was highly distributed in big cities such as Bangkok and its suburbs. In owned dogs, it was linked to household demographics, whereas it was related to community factors in ownerless dogs. The number of estimated dogs in the entire country was 12.8 million heads including 11.2 million owned dogs (21.7 heads/km2) and 1.6 million ownerless dogs (3.2 heads/km2). The methods developed here are extrapolatable to a larger area and use much less budget and manpower compared to the present practices. Our results are helpful for canine rabies prevention and control programs, such as dog population management and control and rabies vaccine allocation.
Facebook
TwitterIntroductionThe aim of this study was to determine patterns of physical activity in pet dogs using real-world data at a population scale aided by the use of accelerometers and electronic health records (EHRs).MethodsA directed acyclic graph (DAG) was created to capture background knowledge and causal assumptions related to dog activity, and this was used to identify relevant data sources, which included activity data from commercially available accelerometers, and health and patient metadata from the EHRs. Linear mixed models (LMM) were fitted to the number of active minutes following log-transformation with the fixed effects tested based on the variables of interest and the adjustment sets indicated by the DAG.ResultsActivity was recorded on 8,726,606 days for 28,562 dogs with 136,876 associated EHRs, with the median number of activity records per dog being 162 [interquartile range (IQR) 60–390]. The average recorded activity per day of 51 min was much lower than previous estimates of physical activity, and there was wide variation in activity levels from less than 10 to over 600 min per day. Physical activity decreased with age, an effect that was dependent on breed size, whereby there was a greater decline in activity for age as breed size increased. Activity increased with breed size and owner age independently. Activity also varied independently with sex, location, climate, season and day of the week: males were more active than females, and dogs were more active in rural areas, in hot dry or marine climates, in spring, and on weekends.ConclusionAccelerometer-derived activity data gathered from pet dogs living in North America was used to determine associations with both dog and environmental characteristics. Knowledge of these associations could be used to inform daily exercise and caloric requirements for dogs, and how they should be adapted according to individual circumstances.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Over a 1000 images of cats and dogs scraped off of google images. The problem statement is to build a model that can classify between a cat and a dog in an image as accurately as possible.
Image sizes range from roughly 100x100 pixels to 2000x1000 pixels.
Image format is jpeg.
Duplicates have been removed.
Facebook
TwitterData on annual population change for prairie dogs in Montana and Utah, USA, 2000-2005. Prairie dog species included black-tailed prairie dogs (PDs) (BTPD, Cynomys ludovicianus) in north-central Montana, white-tailed PDs (WTPD, Cynomys leucurus) in eastern Utah, and Utah PDs (UPD, Cynomys parvidens) in southwestern Utah. Field research was completed by the U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, and colleagues. Data were collected on paired plots. Each pair included a plot treated annually with deltamethrin dust for flea control and plague mitigation and a plot left untreated as baselines. Paired plots had similar ecological features on the same (split) or nearby (separate) colonies. One plot within each pair was randomly selected for deltamethrin dust treatment. We used summertime visual counts as an index to PD population size.We conducted visual counts annually during June-August, after young PDs were aboveground. We used binoculars and spotting scopes to systematically and repeatedly scan the plots (each plot was 3-9 hectares in area), beginning just after sunrise and continuing until warming temperatures caused a decline in counts. We repeated the procedure for three days, using for analysis the highest count obtained. We counted from the same locations each year, simultaneously counting treated and non-treated plots of each pair. Visual counts were transformed into values of finite population change by dividing the PD count at the end of an annual interval by the count at the beginning of the interval. For example, if year is 2001, then population change was for the interval 2000 to 2001. Primary funding was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey, and Bureau of Land Management, supplemented by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources and the Utah Department of Natural Resources Endangered Species Mitigation Fund. In-kind support was provided by the Bryce Canyon National Park, Dixie National Forest and BLM offices in Utah (Vernal, Cedar City, Richfield, and Torrey), Colorado (Meeker), and Montana (Malta). R. Reading and B. Miller of the Denver Zoological Foundation provided logistical support for parts of the study.
Facebook
TwitterObjective: To report demographic characteristics of a contemporary population of dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma and assess the relationship between demographic characteristics, site distribution, and phylogenetic breed clusters. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: A search of the Veterinary Medical Database was performed for dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma as a new diagnosis. Entries were reviewed for the sex, neuter status, age at diagnosis, breed, affected limb, and tumor location. The reported breed for purebred dogs was used to categorize each dog into one of five phylogenetic groups based on microsatellite analysis. Results: 744 client-owned dogs were included in the study. Study dogs were represented by a male-to-female ratio of 0.95:1.0, the majority of which (80.9%) were neutered. Most dogs were diagnosed between 7-10 years of age. The majority (77.8%) of dogs were large or giant-breed dogs. Purebred dogs comprised 80.4% of the population. The most common purebred breed affected by OS was the Rottweiler (17.1%). The most common phylogenetic group represented was Mastiff-Terrier (M-T, 26.3%). OS was more commonly located in the forelimb (64.2%) versus the hindlimb (35.8%), and the humerus was the most common site (20.9%). The distribution of age groups and tumor locations were significantly different between phylogenetic clusters. The distribution of age groups and neuter status were significantly different between size groups. Conclusions and Significance: The demographic data of canine appendicular OS are similar to previous reports. The data on phylogenetic associations can guide future studies aimed at evaluating the genomic mutations that contribute to OS development and its biological behavior.
Facebook
TwitterThe population of dogs kept as pets in the United Kingdom (UK) was estimated at **** million in 2024, which is an increase of around *** million from the previous year. Dog ownership in the UK As the population of dogs grew in the United Kingdom over the last decade, so did the share of dog-owning households in the UK. Between 2019/20 and 2021/22, the share of UK households owning a pet dog jumped from ** percent to around ** percent. This sudden increase could be attributed to the coronavirus pandemic and the resulting government-imposed quarantines that forced people to stay at home. UK households own pet dogs from various breeds. However, Labrador Retrievers were by far the most popular dog breed in the UK, with around ****** registrations in 2020. French Bulldogs were also equally popular with ****** registrations in that year. How much does it cost to own a dog in the UK? Consumer spending on pets and related products went up significantly in the United Kingdom between 2005 and 2020, with expenditure levels peaking at **** billion British pounds in 2020. The annual cost of keeping a pet dog in the UK amounted to an estimated ***** GBP as of 2022. Broken down by expense type, boarding for two weeks cost approximately *** GBP per year and is the costliest part of owning a pet dog, followed by pet insurance estimated at around *** GBP annually.
Facebook
TwitterData about dogs
Data about dogs from https://informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/best-in-show-whats-the-top-data-dog/
Breeds: ['Border Collie', 'Border Terrier', 'Brittany', 'Cairn Terrier', 'Welsh Springer Spaniel', 'English Cocker Spaniel', 'Cocker Spaniel', 'Papillon', 'Australian Cattle Dog', 'Shetland Sheepdog', 'Siberian Husky', 'Lhasa Apso', 'Affenpinscher', 'Dachshund', 'Miniature Schnauzer', 'Chihuahua', 'Australian Terrier', 'Whippet', 'English Springer Spaniel', 'West Highland White Terrier', 'Bedlington Terrier', 'Poodle', 'Bichon Frise', 'German Shorthaired Pointer', 'Pointer', 'Tibetan Spaniel', 'Labrador Retriever', 'Maltese', 'Pomeranian', 'Shih Tzu', 'Australian Shepherd', 'Yorkshire Terrier', 'Irish Setter', 'Pharaoh Hound', 'Brussels Griffon', 'Golden Retriever', 'Samoyed', 'Beagle', 'Chesapeake Bay Retriever', 'Tibetan Terrier', 'Gordon Setter', 'English Setter', 'Pug', 'Briard', 'Norfolk Terrier', 'Flat-Coated Retriever', 'Boston Terrier', 'Doberman Pinscher', 'English Toy Spaniel', 'Belgian Tervuren', 'Cavalier King Charles Spaniel', 'Dalmatian', 'Basset Hound', 'Basenji', 'Italian Greyhound', 'Staffordshire Bull Terrier', 'Bouvier des Flandres', 'Pembroke Welsh Corgi', 'Clumber Spaniel', 'Dandie Dinmont Terrier', 'Saluki', 'Giant Schnauzer', 'Greyhound', 'Scottish Terrier', 'Rottweiler', 'Kerry Blue Terrier', 'Afghan Hound', 'Newfoundland', 'German Shepherd', 'Pekingese', 'Old English Sheepdog', 'Akita', 'Rhodesian Ridgeback', 'French Bulldog', 'Borzoi', 'Bernese Mountain Dog', 'Bull Terrier', 'Boxer', 'Alaskan Malamute', 'Chow Chow', 'Bloodhound', 'Irish Wolfhound', 'Bullmastiff', 'Mastiff', 'Great Dane', 'Saint Bernard', 'Bulldog', 'Airedale Terrier', 'American English Coonhound', 'American Eskimo Dog', 'American Foxhound', 'American Staffordshire Terrier', 'American Water Spaniel', 'Anatolian Shepherd Dog', 'Bearded Collie', 'Beauceron', 'Belgian Malinois', 'Belgian Sheepdog', 'Black and Tan Coonhound', 'Black Russian Terrier', 'Bluetick Coonhound', 'Boykin Spaniel', 'Canaan Dog', 'Cane Corso', 'Cardigan Welsh Corgi', 'Cesky Terrier', 'Chinese Crested', 'Chinese Shar Pei', 'Collie', 'Curly Coated Retriever', 'English Foxhound', 'Entlebucher Mountain Dog', 'Field Spaniel', 'Finnish Lapphund', 'Finnish Spitz', 'German Pinscher', 'German Wirehaired Pointer', 'Glen of Imaal Terrier', 'Great Pyrenees', 'Greater Swiss Mountain Dog', 'Harrier', 'Havanese', 'Ibizan Hound', 'Icelandic Sheepdog', 'Irish Red and White Setter', 'Irish Terrier', 'Irish Water Spaniel', 'Japanese Chin', 'Keeshond', 'Komondor', 'Kuvasz', 'Lakeland Terrier', 'Leonberger', 'Looked - nothing', 'Löwchen', 'Manchester Terrier', 'Miniature Bull Terrier', 'Miniature Pinscher', 'Neapolitan Mastiff', 'Norwegian Buhund', 'Norwegian Elkhound', 'Norwegian Lundehund', 'Norwich Terrier', 'NOT POSSIBLE IF NO INTELLIGENCE DATA', 'Nova Scotia Duck Tolling Retriever', 'Otterhound', 'Parson Russell Terrier', 'Petit Basset Griffon Vendeen', 'Plott', 'Polish Lowland Sheepdog', 'Portuguese Water Dog', 'Puli', 'Pyrenean Shepherd', 'Redbone Coonhound', 'Schipperke', 'Scottish Deerhound', 'Sealyham Terrier', 'Shiba Inu', 'Silky Terrier', 'Skye Terrier', 'Smooth Fox Terrier', 'Soft-Coated Wheaten Terrier', 'Spinone Italiano', 'Standard Schnauzer', 'Sussex Spaniel', 'Swedish Vallhund', 'Tibetan Mastiff', 'Toy Fox Terrier', 'Vizsla', 'Weimaraner', 'Welsh Terrier', 'Wire Fox Terrier', 'Wirehaired Pointing Griffon', 'Xoloitzcuintli']
Columns: ['Dog breed', 'Unnamed: 1', 'category', 'Unnamed: 3', 'datadog score', 'POPULARITY IN US', 'POPULARITY IN US.1', 'LIFETIME COST, $', '5 LIFETIME COST', 'Unnamed: 9', '1 INTELLIGENCE (TRAINABILITY) ranking', 'INTELLIGENCE (TRAINABILITY) ranking', '2 LONGEVITY', 'LONGEVITY', '3 NO. OF GENETIC AILMENTS', 'GENETIC AILMENTS', '4a average purchase price, US$', 'average purchase price, US$', '4b food costs per year, US$', 'food costs per year, US$', '5a grooming required ', 'grooming required ', '5b suitability for children ', 'suitability for children ', 'Unnamed: 24', 'ULTIMATE TOP DOG MEGA SCORE (with kids)', 'ULTIMATE TOP DATA DOG MEGA RANKING - without kids', 'ULTIMATE TOP DATA DOG MEGA RANKING - with kids', 'ULTIMATE TOP DOG MEGA SCORE', 'POPULAR RATING', 'Unnamed: 30', 'size category', 'weight (kg)', 'weight (lbs)', 'shoulder height (cm)', 'shoulder height (in)', 'Unnamed...
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The percentage of the study zone covered by each type of land use was calculated using QGIS.
Facebook
Twitter
According to our latest research, the dog training dummy market size reached USD 185.4 million globally in 2024. The market is poised for robust expansion, exhibiting a CAGR of 5.8% from 2025 to 2033. By the end of the forecast period in 2033, the market is projected to achieve a value of USD 312.7 million. This growth trajectory is fueled by a rising emphasis on effective canine training, growing pet ownership, and the increasing popularity of dog sports and hunting activities worldwide.
The primary growth driver for the dog training dummy market is the surge in pet ownership, particularly in urban areas where dogs are increasingly being kept as companions. With the humanization of pets, owners are more invested in their pets' behavior, training, and overall well-being. This trend is further amplified by the proliferation of dog training schools, the growing influence of social media showcasing well-trained dogs, and the rising awareness of responsible pet ownership. As a result, demand for specialized training aids, such as dog training dummies, has witnessed a significant uptick, particularly among first-time dog owners seeking to instill obedience and retrieve skills in their pets.
Another key factor propelling the market is the expanding application of dog training dummies in professional training environments, such as police and military canine units, as well as hunting and sporting circles. These sectors require high-quality, durable, and often specialized training dummies that can simulate real-world scenarios. The integration of advanced materials and scent technologies in dummies has further enhanced their efficacy and appeal, supporting the training of dogs for search and rescue, detection, and retrieval tasks. This growth is also underpinned by the increasing investment in canine training infrastructure by government and private organizations, aiming to improve service dog capabilities.
Innovation within the dog training dummy market has also contributed to its expansion. Manufacturers are focusing on ergonomics, durability, and safety, resulting in the development of products that cater to a wide range of dog breeds and training applications. The introduction of scented and foam dummies, for example, addresses the need for more realistic training experiences, while the use of eco-friendly and non-toxic materials aligns with growing consumer preference for sustainable products. These advancements not only enhance the training process but also broaden the market's appeal to environmentally conscious consumers and professional trainers alike.
From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the dog training dummy market, accounting for the largest share in 2024. This leadership is attributed to the region's high pet ownership rates, established pet care industry, and strong culture of hunting and dog sports. Europe follows closely, benefiting from a mature pet market and stringent regulations that promote responsible dog ownership. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is emerging as a high-growth territory, driven by increasing disposable incomes, urbanization, and a growing affinity for pets among younger demographics. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa, although smaller in market share, are expected to witness steady growth due to rising awareness and gradual shifts in pet ownership trends.
The dog training dummy market is segmented by product type into canvas dummies, plastic dummies, foam dummies, scented dummies, and others. Canvas dummies remain a staple in the industry due to their ruggedness, water resistance, and suitability for both land and water training. Favored by professional trainers and hunters alike, these dummies are designed to withstand repeated use and harsh outdoor conditions. Manufacturers continue to innovate by incorporating reinforced stitching, ergonomic shapes, and vibrant colors to impro
Facebook
Twitter.txt files
Facebook
TwitterDog population size estimation given by the foot-patrol transect survey, the human: Dog ratio and the total owned dog census collected during the “One Health Poptún” project.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Dog ownership determinants in Kandal province: Results of the negative binomial regression model with the number of dogs per family as model outcome, the number of children younger than 15yrs, the sex and age of the family’s head, occurrence of at least one bite event during the previous year and the village as explanatory variable.
Facebook
TwitterThe data comes from the American Kennel Club courtesy
breed_traits - trait information on each dog breed and scores for each trait (wide format)
trait_description - long descriptions of each trait and values corresponding to Trait_Score
breed_rank_all- popularity of dog breeds by AKC registration statistics from 2013-2020
breed_traits_long.csv| variable | class | description |
|---|---|---|
| Breed | character | Dog Breed |
| Trait | character | Name of trait/characteristic |
| Trait_Score | character | Placement on scale of 1-5 for the trait, with the exception of a description for coat type and length |
breed_traits.csv| variable | class | description |
|---|---|---|
| Breed | character | Dog Breed |
| Affectionate With Family | character | Placement on scale of 1-5 for the breed's tendancy to be "Affectionate With Family" (Trait_Score) |
| Good With Young Children | character | Placement on scale of 1-5 for the breed's tendancy to be "Good With Young Children" (Trait_Score) |
| Good With Other Dogs | character | Placement on scale of 1-5 for the breed's tendancy to be "Good With Other Dogs" (Trait_Score) |
| Shedding Level | character | Placement on scale of 1-5 for the breed's "Shedding Level" (Trait_Score) |
| Coat Grooming Frequency | character | Placement on scale of 1-5 for the breed's "Coat Grooming Frequency" (Trait_Score) |
| Drooling Level | character | Placement on scale of 1-5 for the breed's "Drooling Level" (Trait_Score) |
| Coat Type | character | Description of the breed's coat type (Trait_Score) |
| Coat Length | character | Description of the breed's coat length (Trait_Score) |
| Openness To Strangers | character | Placement on scale of 1-5 for the breed's tendancy to be open to strangers (Trait_Score) |
| Playfulness Level | character | Placement on scale of 1-5 for the breed's tendancy to be playful (Trait_Score) |
| Watchdog/Protective Nature | character | Placement on scale of 1-5 for the breed's "Watchdog/Protective Nature" (Trait_Score) |
| Adaptability Level | character | Placement on scale of 1-5 for the breed's tendancy to be adaptable (Trait_Score) |
| Trainability Level | character | Placement on scale of 1-5 for the breed's tendancy to be adaptable (Trait_Score) |
| Energy Level | character | Placement on scale of 1-5 for the breed's "Energy Level" (Trait_Score) |
| Barking Level | character | Placement on scale of 1-5 for the breed's "Barking Level" (Trait_Score) |
| Mental Stimulation Needs | character | Placement on scale of 1-5 for the breed's "Mental Stimulation Needs" (Trait_Score) |
trait_description.csv| variable | class | description |
|---|---|---|
| Trait | character | Dog Breed |
| Trait_1 | character | Value corresponding to Trait when Trait_Score = 1 |
| Trait_5 | character | Value corresponding to Trait when Trait_Score = 5 |
| Description | character | Long description of trait |
breed_rank_all.csv| variable | class | description |
|---|---|---|
| Breed | character | Dog Breed |
| 2013 Rank | character | Popularity of breed based on AKC registration statistics in 2013 |
| 2014 Rank | character | Popularity of breed based on AKC registration statistics in 2014 |
| 2015 Rank | character | Popularity of breed based on AKC registration statistics in 2015 |
| 2016 Rank | character | Popularity of breed based on AKC registration statistics in 2016 |
| 2017 Rank | character | Popularity of breed based on AKC registration statistics in 2017 |
| 2018 Rank | character | Popularity of breed based on AKC registration statistics in 2018 |
| 2019 Rank | character | Popularity of breed based on AKC registration statistics in 2019 |
| 2020 Rank | character | Popularity of breed based on AKC registration statistics in 2020 |
| links | character | Link to the dog breed's AKC webpage |
| Image | character | Link to image of dog breed |
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/
United States Pet Market size was valued at USD 67.5 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 106.9 Billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 5.91% from 2026 to 2032. United States Pet Market DriversThe United States Pet Market is one of the world's largest and most mature, exhibiting remarkable resilience and consistent growth, with the total pet industry expenditures projected to reach approximately $157 Billion in 2025. This robust expansion, supported by a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) often cited around 5.9% through 2032, is fueled by profound shifts in consumer sentiment, digital adoption, and technological innovation. The core drivers reflect the evolving role of pets from companions to full family members.Rising Pet Ownership Across Demographics: A significant driver is the increasing pet ownership rate, currently involving about 94 million U.S. households. This surge is pronounced among younger demographics, with Millennials and Gen Z now representing the largest segments of pet owners, driven by trends like delaying marriage and child-rearing, increased urbanization, and a desire for companionship. The shift toward remote and hybrid work models post-pandemic has also made pet ownership more feasible for many. This broad, sustained increase in the pet population naturally scales demand for all associated products and services, laying the foundation for market growth.Humanization of Pets & Premiumization Trends: The Humanization of Pets is the primary philosophical and financial driver of the market. Pet owners increasingly view their animals as integral family members, leading to a willingness to spend significantly more on their well-being.
Facebook
TwitterIn the pet dog market in China, the dog food segment achieved a revenue of **** billion yuan in 2018, accounting for roughly ** percent of the pet dog market. That year, the total revenue of the pet dog market amounted to **** billion yuan, representing around ** percent of the whole pet industry. Dogs have always been popular among Chinese families in rural villages since they can safeguard houses.
Facebook
TwitterApache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
The Cat and Dog Classification dataset is a standard computer vision dataset that involves classifying photos as either containing a dog or a cat. This dataset is provided as a subset of photos from a much larger dataset of approximately 25 thousands.
The dataset contains 24,998 images, split into 12,499 Cat images and 12,499 Dog images. The training images are divided equally between cat and dog images, while the test images are not labeled. This allows users to evaluate their models on unseen data.
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F7367057%2F498b0fc0a7a8cf40ac4337da82a4ebc5%2Fhow-to-introduce-a-dog-to-a-cat-blog-cover.webp?generation=1696702214010539&alt=media" alt="">
Facebook
Twitter
According to our latest research, the global frozen corn dogs market size reached USD 2.13 billion in 2024, reflecting robust consumer demand and evolving food consumption patterns. The market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 5.4% during the forecast period, with the market size expected to reach USD 3.37 billion by 2033. This growth is primarily driven by the increasing popularity of convenient, ready-to-eat snack options and the expansion of product varieties catering to diverse dietary preferences.
One of the primary growth factors propelling the frozen corn dogs market is the rising demand for quick and easy meal solutions among busy consumers. As lifestyles become increasingly hectic, especially in urban areas, the need for convenient food options that require minimal preparation has soared. Frozen corn dogs, with their simple heating instructions and appealing taste, have become a staple in both household freezers and food service establishments. The market has also benefited from aggressive marketing campaigns and the introduction of new flavors and formats, which have helped to keep consumer interest high and attract new customer segments, particularly among younger demographics seeking novelty in their food choices.
Product innovation has played a significant role in the expansion of the frozen corn dogs market. Manufacturers are investing in research and development to create varieties that cater to health-conscious consumers, such as gluten-free, low-fat, and cheese-filled options. This diversification has enabled brands to tap into niche markets, including those with dietary restrictions or preferences for specific ingredients. Additionally, the use of premium ingredients and cleaner labels has enhanced the perception of frozen corn dogs as a higher-quality snack, further driving market growth. The development of mini corn dogs and bite-sized options has also contributed to increased consumption, as these products are well-suited for parties, gatherings, and on-the-go snacking.
The distribution landscape for frozen corn dogs has evolved significantly, with the proliferation of e-commerce and online grocery platforms making these products more accessible than ever before. Supermarkets and hypermarkets continue to dominate sales, but the growing popularity of online retail has introduced a new level of convenience, allowing consumers to purchase frozen corn dogs from the comfort of their homes. This shift in distribution channels has enabled brands to reach a wider audience and respond more quickly to changing consumer preferences. Furthermore, the food service industry, including quick-service restaurants and cafeterias, has increasingly incorporated frozen corn dogs into their menus, recognizing their broad appeal and ease of preparation.
In addition to the variety of frozen corn dog options, accessories like the Telescopic Hot-Dog Fork have gained popularity among consumers who enjoy outdoor cooking and barbecues. This innovative tool allows for easy handling and cooking of hot dogs over open flames, making it a favorite for camping trips and backyard gatherings. The convenience of a retractable design ensures that it can be easily packed and transported, adding to its appeal. As more consumers seek versatile and practical cooking accessories, products like the Telescopic Hot-Dog Fork are becoming essential companions for those who enjoy preparing corn dogs and other grilled snacks in outdoor settings.
Regionally, North America remains the largest market for frozen corn dogs, accounting for the majority of global sales in 2024. The United States, in particular, has a long-standing cultural association with corn dogs, making them a popular choice at fairs, sporting events, and in households. However, the market is witnessing significant growth in the Asia Pacific region, where changing dietary habits and increasing exposure to Western cuisines are driving demand. Europe and Latin America are also experiencing steady growth, supported by expanding retail networks and the introduction of region-specific flavors. The Middle East & Africa, while representing a smaller share of the market, is expected to see accelerated growth due to rising urbanization and greater acceptance of convenience foods.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2020, there were approximately **** million large dogs (over ** lbs or over ** kg) in Canadian households as pets. In contrast, small dogs (up to ** lbs or * kg) had a total population of around **** million.