Facebook
TwitterAs of the third quarter of 2025, photo and video sharing app Snapchat had 477 million daily active users worldwide, up from 469 million global DAU in the second quarter of 2025. The app has seen steady increases in daily active users since the beginning of 2019. Snapchat is relevant for teenagers Originally launched in 2011, Snapchat has become one of the most popular social messaging and photo-sharing apps worldwide, making its CEO and co-founder, Evan Spiegel, one of the world’s richest social media entrepreneurs. With over 900 million active users as of February 2025, Snapchat easily ranks among the most popular social networks worldwide. According to U.S. teenagers in fall 2023, Snapchat is the second most important social network of their generation, ahead of photo-sharing competitor Instagram and other networks such as Twitter or Facebook. Overall, 48 percent of U.S. internet users aged 15 to 25 years were reportedly using Snapchat, the highest usage reach among any age group. When it comes to user satisfaction with social media, Snapchat’s performance is fair to middling. According to recent survey data, the social app scored 72 out of 100 points on a consumer satisfaction scale, ranking ahead of Twitter and Facebook but behind Pinterest and eternal rival Instagram.
Facebook
TwitterThe number of snapchat users in the United States was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2028 by in total 5.7 million users (+5.3 percent). After the ninth consecutive increasing year, the snapchat user base is estimated to reach 113.3 million users and therefore a new peak in 2028. Notably, the number of snapchat users of was continuously increasing over the past years.The user numbers, depicted here regarding the platform Snapchat, have been estimated by taking into account company filings or press material, secondary research, app downloads and traffic data. They refer to the average monthly active users over the period and count multiple accounts by persons only once.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the number of snapchat users in countries like Canada and Mexico.
Facebook
TwitterThe global number of snapchat users in was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2028 by in total 165.7 million users (+27 percent). After the ninth consecutive increasing year, the snapchat user base is estimated to reach 779.3 million users and therefore a new peak in 2028. Notably, the number of snapchat users of was continuously increasing over the past years.The user numbers, depicted here regarding the platform Snapchat, have been estimated by taking into account company filings or press material, secondary research, app downloads and traffic data. They refer to the average monthly active users over the period and count multiple accounts by persons only once.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the number of snapchat users in countries like Africa and the Americas.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2021, photo and social media app Snapchat had approximately *** million monthly active users worldwide, a year-on-year change of +**** percent on the previous year. Overall, **** percent of internet users use Snapchat. It is estimated that the platform will reach over *** million monthly active users by 2024.
Facebook
TwitterAs of October 2025, men aged 18 to 24 years accounted for around *** in **** Snapchat users worldwide, while women in the same age group represented **** percent of the platform’s audience. This made 18- to 24-year-olds Snapchat’s largest user segment. Additionally, approximately **** percent of users were under the age of 18. Snapchat’s global users Snapchat has experienced significant increases in global audience size in recent years. In 2022, Snapchat had over *** million users, an increase of over *** percent when compared with the number of users in 2018. By 2027, it is estimated that *** million people will be using the app. As of January 2024, India was home to almost *** million Snapchat users, whilst the United States and Pakistan had *** million and ** million users, respectively. Snapchat+ subscription Snapchat released a paid version of the service in June 2022, offering pre-release and experimental features to those willing to pay **** U.S. dollars per month. As of the fourth quarter of 2023, around ***** million users were subscribing to Snapchat+. Snapchat is not the only social platform to have introduced a subscription option. Meta Verified, X/Twitter Blue, and Reddit also present advantages to users in exchange for a monthly charge.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
https://snap.stanford.edu/data/com-Youtube.html
Dataset information
Youtube (http://www.youtube.com/) is a video-sharing web site that includes
a social network. In the Youtube social network, users form friendship each
other and users can create groups which other users can join. We consider
such user-defined groups as ground-truth communities. This data is provided
by Alan Mislove et al.
(http://socialnetworks.mpi-sws.org/data-imc2007.html)
We regard each connected component in a group as a separate ground-truth
community. We remove the ground-truth communities which have less than 3
nodes. We also provide the top 5,000 communities with highest quality
which are described in our paper (http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.6233). As for
the network, we provide the largest connected component.
Network statistics
Nodes 1,134,890
Edges 2,987,624
Nodes in largest WCC 1134890 (1.000)
Edges in largest WCC 2987624 (1.000)
Nodes in largest SCC 1134890 (1.000)
Edges in largest SCC 2987624 (1.000)
Average clustering coefficient 0.0808
Number of triangles 3056386
Fraction of closed triangles 0.002081
Diameter (longest shortest path) 20
90-percentile effective diameter 6.5
Community statistics
Number of communities 8,385
Average community size 13.50
Average membership size 0.10
Source (citation)
J. Yang and J. Leskovec. Defining and Evaluating Network Communities based
on Ground-truth. ICDM, 2012. http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.6233
Files
File Description
com-youtube.ungraph.txt.gz Undirected Youtube network
com-youtube.all.cmty.txt.gz Youtube communities
com-youtube.top5000.cmty.txt.gz Youtube communities (Top 5,000)
The graph in the SNAP data set is 1-based, with nodes numbered 1 to
1,157,827.
In the SuiteSparse Matrix Collection, Problem.A is the undirected Youtube
network, a matrix of size n-by-n with n=1,134,890, which is the number of
unique user id's appearing in any edge.
Problem.aux.nodeid is a list of the node id's that appear in the SNAP data
set. A(i,j)=1 if person nodeid(i) is friends with person nodeid(j). The
node id's are the same as the SNAP data set (1-based).
C = Problem.aux.Communities_all is a sparse matrix of size n by 16,386
which represents the communities in the com-youtube.all.cmty.txt file.
The kth line in that file defines the kth community, and is the column
C(:,k), where C(i,k)=1 if person ...
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Snap reported $12.68B in Market Capitalization this November of 2025, considering the latest stock price and the number of outstanding shares.Data for Snap | SNAP - Market Capitalization including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last December in 2025.
Facebook
TwitterOpen Database License (ODbL) v1.0https://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
The SNAP participation rate shows how many households in Champaign County receive SNAP benefits, as a percentage of the total number of households in the county. The SNAP participation rate can serve as an indicator of poverty and need in the area, as income-based thresholds establish SNAP eligibility. However, not every household in poverty receives SNAP benefits, as can be determined by comparing the poverty rate between 2005 and 2024 and the percentage of households receiving SNAP benefits between 2005 and 2024.
The number of households and the percentage of households receiving SNAP benefits was higher in 2024 than in 2005, but we cannot establish a trend based on year-to-year changes, as in many years these changes are not statistically significant.
SNAP participation data was sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) 1-Year Estimates, which are released annually.
As with any datasets that are estimates rather than exact counts, it is important to take into account the margins of error (listed in the column beside each figure) when drawing conclusions from the data.
Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, instead of providing the standard 1-year data products, the Census Bureau released experimental estimates from the 1-year data in 2020. This includes a limited number of data tables for the nation, states, and the District of Columbia. The Census Bureau states that the 2020 ACS 1-year experimental tables use an experimental estimation methodology and should not be compared with other ACS data. For these reasons, and because data is not available for Champaign County, no data for 2020 is included in this Indicator.
For interested data users, the 2020 ACS 1-Year Experimental data release includes a dataset on Receipt of Food Stamps/SNAP in the Past 12 Months by Presence of Children Under 18 Years for Households.
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2024 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using data.census.gov; (1 December 2025).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2023 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using data.census.gov; (17 October 2024).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2022 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using data.census.gov; (26 September 2023).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2021 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using data.census.gov; (5 October 2022).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2019 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using data.census.gov; (8 June 2021).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2018 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using data.census.gov; (8 June 2021).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2017 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (13 September 2018).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (14 September 2017).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2015 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (19 September 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2013 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2012 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2011 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2010 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2009 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2008 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2007 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2006 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2005 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table S2201; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The network was generated using email data from a large European research institution. For a period from October 2003 to May 2005 (18 months) we have anonymized information about all incoming and outgoing email of the research institution. For each sent or received email message we know the time, the sender and the recipient of the email. Overall we have 3,038,531 emails between 287,755 different email addresses. Note that we have a complete email graph for only 1,258 email addresses that come from the research institution. Furthermore, there are 34,203 email addresses that both sent and received email within the span of our dataset. All other email addresses are either non-existing, mistyped or spam.
Given a set of email messages, each node corresponds to an email address. We create a directed edge between nodes i and j, if i sent at least one message to j.
Enron email communication network covers all the email communication within a dataset of around half million emails. This data was originally made public, and posted to the web, by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission during its investigation. Nodes of the network are email addresses and if an address i sent at least one email to address j, the graph contains an undirected edge from i to j. Note that non-Enron email addresses act as sinks and sources in the network as we only observe their communication with the Enron email addresses.
The Enron email data was originally released by William Cohen at CMU.
Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia written collaboratively by volunteers around the world. Each registered user has a talk page, that she and other users can edit in order to communicate and discuss updates to various articles on Wikipedia. Using the latest complete dump of Wikipedia page edit history (from January 3 2008) we extracted all user talk page changes and created a network.
The network contains all the users and discussion from the inception of Wikipedia till January 2008. Nodes in the network represent Wikipedia users and a directed edge from node i to node j represents that user i at least once edited a talk page of user j.
The dynamic face-to-face interaction networks represent the interactions that happen during discussions between a group of participants playing the Resistance game. This dataset contains networks extracted from 62 games. Each game is played by 5-8 participants and lasts between 45--60 minutes. We extract dynamically evolving networks from the free-form discussions using the ICAF algorithm. The extracted networks are used to characterize and detect group deceptive behavior using the DeceptionRank algorithm.
The networks are weighted, directed and temporal. Each node represents a participant. At each 1/3 second, a directed edge from node u to v is weighted by the probability of participant u looking at participant v or the laptop. Additionally, we also provide a binary version where an edge from u to v indicates participant u looks at participant v (or the laptop).
Stanford Network Analysis Platform (SNAP) is a general purpose, high performance system for analysis and manipulation of large networks. Graphs consists of nodes and directed/undirected/multiple edges between the graph nodes. Networks are graphs with data on nodes and/or edges of the network.
The core SNAP library is written in C++ and optimized for maximum performance and compact graph representation. It easily scales to massive networks with hundreds of millions of nodes, and billions of edges. It efficiently manipulates large graphs, calculates structural properties, generates regular and random graphs, and supports attributes on nodes and edges. Besides scalability to large graphs, an additional strength of SNAP is that nodes, edges and attributes in a graph or a network can be changed dynamically during the computation.
SNAP was originally developed by Jure Leskovec in the course of his PhD studies. The first release was made available in Nov, 2009. SNAP uses a general purpose STL (Standard Template Library)-like library GLib developed at Jozef Stefan Institute. SNAP and GLib are being actively developed and used in numerous academic and industrial projects.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Snap stock price, live market quote, shares value, historical data, intraday chart, earnings per share and news.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Snap reported $-103.54M in Net Income for its fiscal quarter ending in September of 2025. Data for Snap | SNAP - Net Income including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last December in 2025.
Facebook
TwitterThe number of snapchat users in India was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2028 by in total *** million users (+**** percent). After the ninth consecutive increasing year, the snapchat user base is estimated to reach ****** million users and therefore a new peak in 2028. Notably, the number of snapchat users of was continuously increasing over the past years.The user numbers, depicted here regarding the platform Snapchat, have been estimated by taking into account company filings or press material, secondary research, app downloads and traffic data. They refer to the average monthly active users over the period and count multiple accounts by persons only once.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to *** countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).
Facebook
Twitterhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain
Graph and download economic data for SNAP Benefits Recipients in California (BR06000CAA647NCEN) from 1989 to 2022 about SNAP, nutrition, food stamps, benefits, food, CA, and USA.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
SNAP Benefits Recipients in Florida was 2969247.00000 Persons in June of 2023, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, SNAP Benefits Recipients in Florida reached a record high of 3886747.00000 in September of 2020 and a record low of 587210.00000 in February of 1986. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for SNAP Benefits Recipients in Florida - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on December of 2025.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
https://snap.stanford.edu/data/sx-askubuntu.html
Dataset information
This is a temporal network of interactions on the stack exchange web site
Ask Ubuntu (http://askubuntu.com/). There are three different types of
interactions represented by a directed edge (u, v, t):
user u answered user v's question at time t (in the graph sx-askubuntu-a2q)
user u commented on user v's question at time t (in the graph
sx-askubuntu-c2q) user u commented on user v's answer at time t (in the
graph sx-askubuntu-c2a)
The graph sx-askubuntu contains the union of these graphs. These graphs
were constructed from the Stack Exchange Data Dump. Node ID numbers
correspond to the 'OwnerUserId' tag in that data dump.
Dataset statistics (sx-askubuntu)
Nodes 159,316
Temporal Edges 964,437
Edges in static graph 596,933
Time span 2613 days
Dataset statistics (sx-askubuntu-a2q)
Nodes 137,517
Temporal Edges 280,102
Edges in static graph 262,106
Time span 2613 days
Dataset statistics (sx-askubuntu-c2q)
Nodes 79,155
Temporal Edges 327,513
Edges in static graph 198,852
Time span 2047 days
Dataset statistics (sx-askubuntu-c2a)
Nodes 75,555
Temporal Edges 356,822
Edges in static graph 178,210
Time span 2418 days
Source (citation)
Ashwin Paranjape, Austin R. Benson, and Jure Leskovec. "Motifs in Temporal
Networks." In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web
Search and Data Mining, 2017.
Files
File Description
sx-askubuntu.txt.gz All interactions
sx-askubuntu-a2q.txt.gz Answers to questions
sx-askubuntu-c2q.txt.gz Comments to questions
sx-askubuntu-c2a.txt.gz Comments to answers
Data format
SRC DST UNIXTS
where edges are separated by a new line and
SRC: id of the source node (a user)
TGT: id of the target node (a user)
UNIXTS: Unix timestamp (seconds since the epoch)
...
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
SNAP Benefits Recipients in California was 5265551.00000 Persons in June of 2023, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, SNAP Benefits Recipients in California reached a record high of 5265551.00000 in June of 2023 and a record low of 1571200.00000 in September of 1985. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for SNAP Benefits Recipients in California - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on December of 2025.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
SNAP Benefits Recipients in Delaware County, PA was 76753.00000 Persons in January of 2022, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, SNAP Benefits Recipients in Delaware County, PA reached a record high of 76753.00000 in January of 2022 and a record low of 24515.00000 in January of 1989. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for SNAP Benefits Recipients in Delaware County, PA - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on November of 2025.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Snap reported $41.27M in EBITDA for its fiscal quarter ending in June of 2025. Data for Snap | SNAP - Ebitda including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last December in 2025.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
SNAP Benefits Recipients in Monroe County, PA was 23010.00000 Persons in January of 2022, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, SNAP Benefits Recipients in Monroe County, PA reached a record high of 23010.00000 in January of 2022 and a record low of 2254.00000 in January of 1989. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for SNAP Benefits Recipients in Monroe County, PA - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on December of 2025.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
SNAP Benefits Recipients in Tennessee was 746080.00000 Persons in June of 2023, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, SNAP Benefits Recipients in Tennessee reached a record high of 1356160.00000 in July of 2013 and a record low of 479220.00000 in October of 1987. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for SNAP Benefits Recipients in Tennessee - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on November of 2025.
Facebook
TwitterAs of the third quarter of 2025, photo and video sharing app Snapchat had 477 million daily active users worldwide, up from 469 million global DAU in the second quarter of 2025. The app has seen steady increases in daily active users since the beginning of 2019. Snapchat is relevant for teenagers Originally launched in 2011, Snapchat has become one of the most popular social messaging and photo-sharing apps worldwide, making its CEO and co-founder, Evan Spiegel, one of the world’s richest social media entrepreneurs. With over 900 million active users as of February 2025, Snapchat easily ranks among the most popular social networks worldwide. According to U.S. teenagers in fall 2023, Snapchat is the second most important social network of their generation, ahead of photo-sharing competitor Instagram and other networks such as Twitter or Facebook. Overall, 48 percent of U.S. internet users aged 15 to 25 years were reportedly using Snapchat, the highest usage reach among any age group. When it comes to user satisfaction with social media, Snapchat’s performance is fair to middling. According to recent survey data, the social app scored 72 out of 100 points on a consumer satisfaction scale, ranking ahead of Twitter and Facebook but behind Pinterest and eternal rival Instagram.