Here’s a detailed description for updating and improving your crop recommendation system based on soil data:

Description of a Crop Recommendation System with Soil Data

A crop recommendation system helps farmers select the best crops to grow based on the specific properties of their soil. This system uses soil characteristics and environmental factors to determine the crops that are most likely to thrive. Recommendations are provided to improve crop yield, optimize resource use, and ensure sustainable farming practices.

Core Components for Recommendations

The system should consider the following soil parameters and external factors to make accurate recommendations:

1. Soil Nutrients:

   • Nitrogen (N): Promotes leafy growth; ideal for crops like spinach, lettuce, and wheat.
   • Phosphorus (P): Essential for root development; crucial for legumes, peas, and root vegetables like carrots.
   • Potassium (K): Enhances disease resistance and fruit quality; important for fruiting plants like tomatoes, bananas, and potatoes.

2. Soil pH:

   • Indicates soil acidity or alkalinity.
   • Neutral pH (6.5-7.5) supports most crops like rice, wheat, and maize.
   • Acidic soil (<6.5) favors crops like tea and coffee.
   • Alkaline soil (>7.5) supports crops like barley and asparagus.

3. Organic Matter:

   • High organic content improves water retention and nutrient availability.
   • Crops like vegetables and fruits benefit from rich organic matter.

4. Moisture Level:

   • Determines irrigation needs and crop suitability.
   • High moisture crops: Paddy, sugarcane.
   • Low moisture crops: Millet, sunflower.

5. Temperature:

   • Warm crops: Maize, rice, and cotton.
   • Cool crops: Wheat, barley, and cabbage.

6. Rainfall:

   • Rain-fed crops (e.g., rice) thrive in high rainfall areas.
   • Drought-resistant crops (e.g., millets) perform well in low-rainfall zones.

7. Geographical Factors:

   • Altitude, latitude, and local climate conditions.
   • Example: Coffee grows well in high altitudes, while coconut thrives in coastal regions.

How to Update Recommendations

1. Dynamic Soil Profiles:

   • Use real-time soil testing data to determine nutrient levels, pH, and moisture.
   • Example: If the nitrogen level is low, recommend nitrogen-fixing crops like legumes.

2. Crop Rotation Insights:

   • Suggest crop rotations to maintain soil health.
   • Example: After a nitrogen-depleting crop like wheat, recommend a nitrogen-fixing crop like lentils.

3. Fertilizer Suggestions:

   • Provide recommendations for fertilizers based on deficiencies.
   • Example: If phosphorus is low, suggest adding rock phosphate.

4. Weather and Climate Integration:

   • Include real-time weather data like rainfall forecasts and temperature trends.
   • Example: Recommend drought-tolerant crops during dry seasons.

5. Regional Crop Suitability:

   • Use regional data to match crops with local soil and climate.
   • Example: Recommend paddy in water-rich regions like Punjab, and millet in arid regions like Rajasthan.

Sample Output for Crop Recommendations

Based on soil and environmental data: - Soil Parameters: - pH: 6.8 (neutral) - Nitrogen: Medium - Phosphorus: Low - Potassium: High - Moisture: Moderate - Recommendations: - Primary Crops: Wheat, Maize, Barley. - Secondary Crops (Improving Soil Health): Lentils, Chickpeas (for nitrogen fixation). - Fertilizer Recommendation: Use phosphorus-rich fertilizers (e.g., DAP).

How to Present Recommendations

• Use a dashboard or mobile app for farmers.
• Show clear visualizations of soil test results and matched crops.
• Include:
  • Top recommended crops.
  • Fertilizer and irrigation tips. -``

The National Soil Database has produced a national database of soil geochemistry including point and spatial distribution maps of major nutrients, major elements, essential trace elements, trace elements of special interest and minor elements. In addition, this study has generated a National Soil Archive, comprising bulk soil samples and a nucleic acids archive each of which represent a valuable resource for future soils research in Ireland. The geographical coherence of the geochemical results was considered to be predominantly underpinned by underlying parent material and glacial geology. Other factors such as soil type, land use, anthropogenic effects and climatic effects were also evident. The coherence between elements, as displayed by multivariate analyses, was evident in this study. Examples included strong relationships between Co, Fe, As, Mn and Cu. This study applied large-scale microbiological analysis of soils for the first time in Ireland and in doing so also investigated microbial community structure in a range of soil types in order to determine the relationship between soil microbiology and chemistry. The results of the microbiological analyses were consistent with geochemical analyses and demonstrated that bacterial community populations appeared to be predominantly determined by soil parent material and soil type. .hidden { display: none }

Soil Classification Datasets

Please ensure to cite the paper when utilizing the dataset in a research study. Refer to the paper link or BibTeX provided below.

This repository contains comprehensive datasets for soil classification and recognition research. The Original Dataset comprises soil images sourced from various online repositories, which have been meticulously cleaned and preprocessed to ensure data quality and consistency. To enhance the dataset's size and diversity, we employed Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), specifically the CycleGAN architecture, to generate synthetic soil images. This augmented collection is referred to as the CyAUG Dataset. Both datasets are specifically designed to advance research in soil classification and recognition using state-of-the-art deep learning methodologies.

This dataset was curated as part of the research study titled "An advanced artificial intelligence framework integrating ensembled convolutional neural networks and Vision Transformers for precise soil classification with adaptive fuzzy logic-based crop recommendations" by Farhan Sheth, Priya Mathur, Amit Kumar Gupta, and Sandeep Chaurasia, published in Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence.

Links

• Paper: An advanced artificial intelligence framework integrating ensembled convolutional neural networks and Vision Transformers for precise soil classification with adaptive fuzzy logic-based crop recommendations
• Code: Development Code (model and recommendation system)

Application produced by this research is available at:

• Agro Companion: Agro Companion
• Server Code: Agro Companion Server

Note: If you are using any part of this project; dataset, code, application, then please cite the work as mentioned in the Citation section below.

Dataset

Both dataset consists of images of 7 different soil types.

The Soil Classification Dataset is structured to facilitate the classification of various soil types based on images. The dataset includes images of the following soil types:

• Alluvial Soil
• Black Soil
• Laterite Soil
• Red Soil
• Yellow Soil
• Arid Soil
• Mountain Soil

The dataset is organized into folders, each named after a specific soil type, containing images of that soil type. The images vary in resolution and quality, providing a diverse set of examples for training and testing classification models.

Original Dataset Details

• Total Images: 1189 images
• Image Format: JPG/JPEG
• Image Size: Varies
• Source: Collected from various online repositories and cleaned for consistency.

CyAUG Dataset Details

• Total Images: 5097 images
• Image Format: JPG/JPEG
• Image Size: Varies
• Source: Generated using CycleGAN to augment the original dataset, enhancing its size and diversity.

Input and Output Parameters

• Input Parameters:
  • Image: The images of the soils (JPG/JPEG format).
  • Label: The labels are in the format 'soil types' (folder names).
• Output Parameter:
  • Classification: The predicted class (soil type) based on the input image.

Citation

If you are using any of the derived dataset, please cite the following paper:

@article{SHETH2025111425,
  title = {An advanced artificial intelligence framework integrating ensembled convolutional neural networks and Vision Transformers for precise soil classification with adaptive fuzzy logic-based crop recommendations},
  journal = {Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence},
  volume = {158},
  pages = {111425},
  year = {2025},
  issn = {0952-1976},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111425},
  url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625014277},
  author = {Farhan Sheth and Priya Mathur and Amit Kumar Gupta and Sandeep Chaurasia},
  keywords = {Soil classification, Crop recommendation, Vision transformers, Convolutional neural network, Transfer learning, Fuzzy logic}
}

The Soil Types Dataset is a collection of images focused on different types of soil. The dataset is currently comprised of six folders, each representing a distinct soil type. It contains a total of 144 labeled photos, showcasing the diversity of soils in the collection.

The dataset is designed to aid in soil classification and analysis tasks, providing valuable visual information for research, machine learning, and data analysis purposes. Each folder within the dataset represents a specific soil type, enabling researchers and practitioners to study and differentiate between different soil characteristics and properties.

The dataset offers a starting point for studying soil variations and exploring potential relationships between soil types and environmental factors. It provides a foundation for developing algorithms, models, and systems that can identify and classify soils based on visual cues.

Given the current size of the dataset, it is considered small, but its value lies in its potential for growth. As new data becomes available, the dataset is expected to expand, offering an increasingly comprehensive collection of soil images. This growth will enhance the dataset's usefulness and facilitate more accurate analysis and classification of soils.

One of the obstacles in applying advanced crop simulation models such as DSSAT at a grid-based platform is the lack of gridded soil input data at various resolutions. Recently, there has been many efforts in scientific communities to develop spatially continuous soil database across the globe. The most representative example is the SoilGrids 1km released by ISRIC in 2014. In addition recent AfSIS project put a lot of efforts to develop more accurate soil database in Africa at high spatial resolution. Taking advantage of those two available high resolution soil databases (SoilGrids 1km and ISRIC-AfSIS at 1km resolution), this project aims to develop a set of DSSAT compatible soil profiles on 5 arc-minute grid (which is HarvestChoice’s standard grid). Six soil properties (bulk density, organic carbon, percentage of clay and silt, soil pH and cation exchange capacity) available from the original SoilGrids 1km or ISRIC-AfSIS were directly used as DSSAT inputs. We applied a pedo-transfer function to derive some soil hydraulic properties (saturated hydraulic conductivity, soil water content at field capacity, wilting point and saturation) which are critical to simulate crop growth. For other required variables, HarvestChoice’s HC27 database are used as a reference. Final outputs are provided in *.SOL file format (DSSAT soil database) for each country at 5-min resolution. In addition, uncertainty maps for organic carbon and soil water content at wilting points at the top 15 cm soil layers were generated to provide brief idea about accuracy of the final products. The generated soil properties were evaluated by visualizing their global maps and by comparing them with IIASA-IFPRI cropland map and AfSIS-GYGA’s available water content maps.

This dataset is a digital soil survey and generally is the most detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely sensed and other information.

This dataset consists of georeferenced digital map data and computerized attribute data. The map data are in a soil survey area extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory of soils and miscellaneous areas that normally occur in a repeatable pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the National Soil Information System relational database, which gives the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.

SSURGO depicts information about the kinds and distribution of soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, the University of Copenhagen Institute of Geography, the European Soil Bureau, the University of Manchester Institute of Landscape Ecology, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, and the Agricultural Research Institute Iceland have shared data and expertise in order to develop the Northern and Mid Latitude Soil Database (Cryosol Working Group, 2001). This database was the source of data for the current product. The spatial coverage of the Northern and Mid Latitude Soil Database is the polar and mid-latitude regions of the northern hemisphere: Alaska, Canada, Conterminous United States, Eurasia (except Italy), Greenland, Iceland, Kazakstan, Mexico, Mongolia, Italy, and Svalbard. The Northern and Mid Latitude Soil Database represents the proportion (percentage) of polygon encompassed by the dominant soil or nonsoil. Soils include turbels, orthels, histels, histosols, mollisols, vertisols, aridisols, andisols, entisols, spodosols, inceptisols (and hapludolls), alfisols (cryalf and udalf), natric great groups, aqu-suborders, glaciers, and rocklands. Also included are data on the circumpolar distribution of gelisols (turbels, orthels, and histels), and the ice content (low, medium, or high) of circumpolar soil materials (from the International Permafrost Association, 1997). The resulting maps show the dominant soil of the spatial polygon unless the polygon is over 90 percent rock or ice. Data are in the U.S. soil classification system and includes the distribution of soil types (%) within a map unit (polygon). Data are available in ESRI shapefile format and include the same attribute values with the exception of Italy, which does not contain distribution values.

This is a dataset download, not a document. The Open button will start the download.Detailed soil units from Soils Surveys covering nonfederal land conducted by the U.S. Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) that differentiates mapped units on the basis of a range of physical, topographic, and chemical properties.

This dataset consists of general soil association units. It was developed by the National Cooperative Soil Survey and supersedes the State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) dataset published in 1994. It consists of a broad based inventory of soils and non-soil areas that occur in a repeatable pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at the scale mapped of 1:250,000 in the continental U.S., Hawaii, Puerto, and the Virgin Islands and 1:1,000,000 in Alaska. The dataset was created by generalizing more detailed soil survey maps. Where more detailed soil survey maps were not available, data on geology, topography, vegetation, and climate were assembled, together with Land Remote Sensing Satellite (LANDSAT) images. Soils of like areas were studied, and the probable classification and extent of the soils were determined.

Map unit composition was determined by transecting or sampling areas on the more detailed maps and expanding the data statistically to characterize the entire map unit.

This dataset consists of georeferenced vector digital data and tabular digital data. The map data were collected in 1- by 2-degree topographic quadrangle units and merged into a seamless national dataset. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the National Soil Information system relational database, which gives the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.

These data provide information about soil features on or near the surface of the Earth. Data were collected as part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. These data are intended for geographic display and analysis at the state, regional, and national level. The data should be displayed and analyzed at scales appropriate for 1:250,000-scale data.

The dataset consists of three raster GeoTIFF files describing the following soil properties in the US: available water capacity, field capacity, and soil porosity. The input data were obtained from the gridded National Soil Survey Geographic (gNATSGO) Database and the Gridded Soil Survey Geographic (gSSURGO) Database with Soil Data Development tools provided by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The soil characteristics derived from the databases were Available Water Capacity (AWC), Water Content (one-third bar) (WC), and Bulk Density (one-third bar) (BD) aggregated as weighted average values in the upper 1 m of soil. AWC and WC layers were converted to mm/m to express respectively available water capacity and field capacity in 1 m of soil, and BD layer was used to produce soil porosity raster assuming that the average particle density of soils is equal to 2.65 g/cm3. For each soil property, soil maps with CONUS, Alaska, and Hawaii geographic coverages were derived from s ...

(Link to Metadata) This data set is a digital soil survey and generally is the most detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely sensed and other information. This data set consists of georeferenced digital map data and computerized attribute data. The map data are in a soil survey area extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory of soils and miscellaneous areas that normally occur in a repeatable pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the National Soil Information System relational database, which gives the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties. Survey Dates - https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/surveylist/soils/survey/state/?stateId=VT

These Soil Mapping Data Packages include 1. a Soil Map dataset which includes the equivalents to Soil Project Boundaries, Soil Survey Spatial View mapping polygons with attributes from the Soil Name and Layer Files, plus + A Soil Site dataset which includes soil pit site information and detailed soil pit descriptions and any associated lab analyses, and + The Soil Data Dictionary which documents the fields and allowable codes within the data. The Soil Map geodatabase contains the 'best available' data ranging from 1:20,000 scale to 1:250,000 scale with overlapping data removed. The choice of the datasets that remain is based on connectivity to the soil attributes (soil name and layer files), map scale and survey date. (Note: the BC Soil Landscapes of Canada (BCSLC) 1:1,000,000 data has not been included in the Soil_Map or SIFT, but is available from: CANSIS. (A complete soils data package with overlapping soil survey mapping and BCSLC is available on request. Note that the soil survey data with attributes can also be viewed interactively in the [Soil Information Finder Tool](The Soil Map dataset is also available for interactive map viewing or as KMZs from the Soil Information Finder Tool website.

This data set provides soil maps for the United States (US) (including Alaska), Canada, Mexico, and a part of Guatemala. The map information content includes maximum soil depth and eight soil attributes including sand, silt, and clay content, gravel content, organic carbon content, pH, cation exchange capacity, and bulk density for the topsoil layer (0-30 cm) and the subsoil layer (30-100 cm). The spatial resolution is 0.25 degree. The Unified North American Soil Map (UNASM) combined information from the state-of-the-art US General Soil Map (STATSGO2) and Soil Landscape of Canada (SLCs) databases. The area not covered by these data sets was filled by using the Harmonized World Soil Database version 1.21 (HWSD1.21). The Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon (NCSCD) database was used to provide more accurate and up-to-date soil organic carbon information for the high-latitude permafrost region and was combined with soil organic carbon content derived from the UNASM (Liu et al., 2013). The UNASM data were utilized in the North American Carbon Program (NACP) Multi-Scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP) as model input driver data (Huntzinger et al., 2013). The driver data were used by 22 terrestrial biosphere models to run baseline and sensitivity simulations. The compilation of these data was facilitated by the NACP Modeling and Synthesis Thematic Data Center (MAST-DC). MAST-DC was a component of the NACP (www.nacarbon.org) designed to support NACP by providing data products and data management services needed for modeling and synthesis activities.

The Harmonized World Soil Database version 2.0 (HWSD v2.0) is a unique global soil inventory providing information on the morphological, chemical and physical properties of soils at approximately 1 km resolution. Its main objective is to serve as a basis for prospective studies on agro-ecological zoning, food security and climate change. The Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD) was established in 2008 by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) and FAO, and in partnership with International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC), the European Soil Bureau Network (ESBN) and the Institute for Soil Sciences Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). The data entry and harmonization within a Geographic Information System (GIS) was carried out at IIASA, with verification of the database undertaken by all partners. HWSD was then updated in 2013 (HWSD v1.2) and in 2023 (HWSD v2.0). This updated version (HWSD v2.0) is built on the previous versions of HWSD with several improvements on (i) the data source that now includes several national soil databases, (ii) an enhanced number of soil attributes available for seven soil depth layers, instead of two in HWSD v1.2, and (iii) a common soil reference for all soil units (FAO1990 and the World Reference Base for Soil Resources). This contributes to a further harmonization of the database. The GIS raster image file is linked to the soil attribute database. The HWSD v2.0 soil attribute database provides information on the soil unit composition for each of the near 30 000 soil association mapping units. The HWSD v2.0 Viewer, provided with the database, creates this link automatically and provides direct access to the soil attribute data and the soil association information. Note: - A tutorial for accessing HWSD ver. 2.0 using R (prepared by David Rossiter, June 2023) has been added as an 'associated resource' (NOTE: Needs the SQLite version of HWSD v2 as provided below). - Soil property estimates in HWSDv2 were derived from Batjes (2016), Geoderma (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.01.034).

The National Cooperative Soil Survey - Soil Characterization Database (NCSS-SCD) contains laboratory data for more than 65,000 locations (i.e. xy coordinates) throughout the United States and its Territories, and about 2,100 locations from other countries. It is a compilation of data from the Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory (KSSL) and several cooperating laboratories. The data steward and distributor is the National Soil Survey Center (NSSC). Information contained within the database includes physical, chemical, biological, mineralogical, morphological, and mid infrared reflectance (MIR) soil measurements, as well a collection of calculated values. The intended use of the data is to support interpretations related to soil use and management.

Data Usage Access to the data is provided via the following user interfaces: 1. Interactive Web Map 2. Lab Data Mart (LDM) for querying data and generating reports 3. Soil Data Access (SDA) web services for querying data 5. Direct download of the entire database in several formats

Data at each location includes measurements at multiple depths (e.g. soil horizons). However, not all analyses have been conducted for each location and depth. Typically, a suite of measurements was collected based upon assumed or known conditions regarding the soil being analyzed. For example, soils of arid environments are routinely analyzed for salts and carbonates as part of the standard analysis suite. Standard morphological soil descriptions are available for about 60,000 of these locations. Mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy is available for about 7,000 locations. Soil fertility measurements, such as those made by Agricultural Experiment Stations, were not made. Most of the data were obtained over the last 40 years, with about 4,000 locations before 1960, 25,000 from 1960-1990, 27,000 from 1990-2010, and 13,000 from 2010 to 2021. Generally, the number of measurements recorded per location has increased over time. Typically, the data were collected to represent a soil series or map unit component concept. They may also have been sampled to determine the range of variation within a given landscape.

Although strict quality-control measures are applied, the NSSC does not warrant that the data are error free. Also, in some cases the measurements are not within the applicability range of the laboratory methods. For example, dispersion of clay is incomplete in some soils by the standard method used for determining particle-size distribution. Soils producing incomplete dispersion include those that are derived from volcanic materials or that have a high content of iron oxides, gypsum, carbonates, or other cementing materials. Also note that determination of clay minerals by x-ray diffraction is relative. Measurements of very high or very low quantities by any method are not very precise. Other measurements have other limitations in some kinds of soils. Such data are retained in the database for research purposes. Also, some of the data for were obtained from cooperating laboratories within the NCSS. The accuracy of the location coordinates has not been quantified but can be inferred from the precision of their decimal degrees and the presence of a map datum. Some older records may correspond to a county centroid. When the map datum is missing it can be assumed that data prior to 1990 was recorded using NAD27 and with WGS84 after 1995.

For detailed information about methods used in the KSSL and other laboratories refer to "Soil Survey Investigation Report No. 42". For information on the application of laboratory data, refer to "Soil Survey Investigation Report No. 45". If you are unfamiliar with any terms or methods feel free to consult your NRCS State Soil Scientist.

Terms of Use This dataset is not designed for use as a primary regulatory tool in permitting or citing decisions but may be used as a reference source. This is public information and may be interpreted by organizations, agencies, units of government, or others based on needs; however, they are responsible for the appropriate application. Federal, State, or local regulatory bodies are not to reassign to the Natural Resources Conservation Service or the National Cooperative Soil Survey any authority for the decisions that they make. The Natural Resources Conservation Service will not perform any evaluations of these data for purposes related solely to State or local regulatory programs.

Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) consists of spatial data and a comprehensive relational database with tables that describe soil properties, interpretations and productivity values. The USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS, formerly Soil Conservation Service) provides a download of the statewide SSURGO database that includes vector and raster spatial data, database tables and their relationship classes, and a user guide.Access SSURGO through the Web Soil Survey (WSS).

Provide soil map (coordinate system: TWD97) data file download.

These datasets are soil survey mapping available in Queensland. These surveys were conducted for different purposes and are mapped at different scales. Refer to individual records for more information.

This data set is a digital soil survey and generally is the most detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely sensed and other information. This data set consists of georeferenced digital map data and computerized attribute data. The map data are in a soil survey area extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory of soils and miscellaneous areas that normally occur in a repeatable pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the National Soil Information System relational database, which gives the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties. For more information, contact: GIS Manager Information Technology & Innovation (ITI) Montgomery County Planning Department, MNCPPC T: 301-650-5620

iSDAsoil dataset soil texture classes derived from sand, silt and clay fractions at 30 m resolution for 0-20 and 20-50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as COG. Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (iSDA points, AfSPDB, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:

Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J. et al. African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30 m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning. Sci Rep 11, 6130 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y.

To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version.

Layer description:

• sol_texture.class_c_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = soil texture class