Soil Classification Datasets

Please ensure to cite the paper when utilizing the dataset in a research study. Refer to the paper link or BibTeX provided below.

This repository contains comprehensive datasets for soil classification and recognition research. The Original Dataset comprises soil images sourced from various online repositories, which have been meticulously cleaned and preprocessed to ensure data quality and consistency. To enhance the dataset's size and diversity, we employed Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), specifically the CycleGAN architecture, to generate synthetic soil images. This augmented collection is referred to as the CyAUG Dataset. Both datasets are specifically designed to advance research in soil classification and recognition using state-of-the-art deep learning methodologies.

This dataset was curated as part of the research study titled "An advanced artificial intelligence framework integrating ensembled convolutional neural networks and Vision Transformers for precise soil classification with adaptive fuzzy logic-based crop recommendations" by Farhan Sheth, Priya Mathur, Amit Kumar Gupta, and Sandeep Chaurasia, published in Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence.

Links

• Paper: An advanced artificial intelligence framework integrating ensembled convolutional neural networks and Vision Transformers for precise soil classification with adaptive fuzzy logic-based crop recommendations
• Code: Development Code (model and recommendation system)

Application produced by this research is available at:

• Agro Companion: Agro Companion
• Server Code: Agro Companion Server

Note: If you are using any part of this project; dataset, code, application, then please cite the work as mentioned in the Citation section below.

Dataset

Both dataset consists of images of 7 different soil types.

The Soil Classification Dataset is structured to facilitate the classification of various soil types based on images. The dataset includes images of the following soil types:

• Alluvial Soil
• Black Soil
• Laterite Soil
• Red Soil
• Yellow Soil
• Arid Soil
• Mountain Soil

The dataset is organized into folders, each named after a specific soil type, containing images of that soil type. The images vary in resolution and quality, providing a diverse set of examples for training and testing classification models.

Original Dataset Details

• Total Images: 1189 images
• Image Format: JPG/JPEG
• Image Size: Varies
• Source: Collected from various online repositories and cleaned for consistency.

CyAUG Dataset Details

• Total Images: 5097 images
• Image Format: JPG/JPEG
• Image Size: Varies
• Source: Generated using CycleGAN to augment the original dataset, enhancing its size and diversity.

Input and Output Parameters

• Input Parameters:
  • Image: The images of the soils (JPG/JPEG format).
  • Label: The labels are in the format 'soil types' (folder names).
• Output Parameter:
  • Classification: The predicted class (soil type) based on the input image.

Citation

If you are using any of the derived dataset, please cite the following paper:

@article{SHETH2025111425,
  title = {An advanced artificial intelligence framework integrating ensembled convolutional neural networks and Vision Transformers for precise soil classification with adaptive fuzzy logic-based crop recommendations},
  journal = {Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence},
  volume = {158},
  pages = {111425},
  year = {2025},
  issn = {0952-1976},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111425},
  url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625014277},
  author = {Farhan Sheth and Priya Mathur and Amit Kumar Gupta and Sandeep Chaurasia},
  keywords = {Soil classification, Crop recommendation, Vision transformers, Convolutional neural network, Transfer learning, Fuzzy logic}
}

Dataset

This dataset was created by JAYAPRAKASHPONDY

Contents

One of the obstacles in applying advanced crop simulation models such as DSSAT at a grid-based platform is the lack of gridded soil input data at various resolutions. Recently, there has been many efforts in scientific communities to develop spatially continuous soil database across the globe. The most representative example is the SoilGrids 1km released by ISRIC in 2014. In addition recent AfSIS project put a lot of efforts to develop more accurate soil database in Africa at high spatial resolution. Taking advantage of those two available high resolution soil databases (SoilGrids 1km and ISRIC-AfSIS at 1km resolution), this project aims to develop a set of DSSAT compatible soil profiles on 5 arc-minute grid (which is HarvestChoice’s standard grid). Six soil properties (bulk density, organic carbon, percentage of clay and silt, soil pH and cation exchange capacity) available from the original SoilGrids 1km or ISRIC-AfSIS were directly used as DSSAT inputs. We applied a pedo-transfer function to derive some soil hydraulic properties (saturated hydraulic conductivity, soil water content at field capacity, wilting point and saturation) which are critical to simulate crop growth. For other required variables, HarvestChoice’s HC27 database are used as a reference. Final outputs are provided in *.SOL file format (DSSAT soil database) for each country at 5-min resolution. In addition, uncertainty maps for organic carbon and soil water content at wilting points at the top 15 cm soil layers were generated to provide brief idea about accuracy of the final products. The generated soil properties were evaluated by visualizing their global maps and by comparing them with IIASA-IFPRI cropland map and AfSIS-GYGA’s available water content maps.

This dataset is a digital soil survey and generally is the most detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely sensed and other information.

This dataset consists of georeferenced digital map data and computerized attribute data. The map data are in a soil survey area extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory of soils and miscellaneous areas that normally occur in a repeatable pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the National Soil Information System relational database, which gives the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.

SSURGO depicts information about the kinds and distribution of soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, the University of Copenhagen Institute of Geography, the European Soil Bureau, the University of Manchester Institute of Landscape Ecology, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, and the Agricultural Research Institute Iceland have shared data and expertise in order to develop the Northern and Mid Latitude Soil Database (Cryosol Working Group, 2001). This database was the source of data for the current product. The spatial coverage of the Northern and Mid Latitude Soil Database is the polar and mid-latitude regions of the northern hemisphere: Alaska, Canada, Conterminous United States, Eurasia (except Italy), Greenland, Iceland, Kazakstan, Mexico, Mongolia, Italy, and Svalbard. The Northern and Mid Latitude Soil Database represents the proportion (percentage) of polygon encompassed by the dominant soil or nonsoil. Soils include turbels, orthels, histels, histosols, mollisols, vertisols, aridisols, andisols, entisols, spodosols, inceptisols (and hapludolls), alfisols (cryalf and udalf), natric great groups, aqu-suborders, glaciers, and rocklands. Also included are data on the circumpolar distribution of gelisols (turbels, orthels, and histels), and the ice content (low, medium, or high) of circumpolar soil materials (from the International Permafrost Association, 1997). The resulting maps show the dominant soil of the spatial polygon unless the polygon is over 90 percent rock or ice. Data are in the U.S. soil classification system and includes the distribution of soil types (%) within a map unit (polygon). Data are available in ESRI shapefile format and include the same attribute values with the exception of Italy, which does not contain distribution values.

Brief Description: This dataset contains 1 million simulated soil samples from various locations around the globe. Each sample includes data on soil texture, pH, organic matter content, moisture content, bulk density, nutrient levels (N, P, K), cation exchange capacity, electrical conductivity, color, porosity, and water holding capacity. Designed for environmental scientists, agronomists, and data scientists, this dataset is ideal for research, machine learning models, and educational purposes. Purpose: To provide a comprehensive soil dataset for environmental and agricultural research, including machine learning and data analysis applications. Data Collection Method: Simulated data generated using Python with realistic ranges and distributions based on common soil characteristics.

Usage Examples

Predictive modeling of soil properties.
Classification of soil types based on texture and nutrient content.
Analysis of soil health and fertility across different geographic locations.

File Descriptions

soil_data.csv - The main dataset file containing 1 million rows of soil data across 17 features.

Data Fields

Soil_ID: Unique identifier for each soil sample.
Location_Latitude and Location_Longitude: Geographic coordinates of the soil sample.
Depth_cm: Depth at which the soil sample was collected (cm).
Texture: Soil texture classification (sandy, loamy, clayey).
pH: Soil pH level.
Organic_Matter_%: Percentage of organic matter in the soil.
Moisture_Content_%: Soil moisture content percentage.
Bulk_Density_g/cm³: Soil bulk density (g/cm³).
Nitrogen_N_ppm, Phosphorus_P_ppm, Potassium_K_ppm: Nutrient levels in parts per million (ppm).
Cation_Exchange_Capacity_meq/100g: Soil's ability to hold positively charged ions (meq/100g).
Electrical_Conductivity_dS/m: Soil electrical conductivity (dS/m).
Soil_Color: Color of the soil (brown, red, black, yellow).
Porosity_%: Percentage of pore space in the soil.
Water_Holding_Capacity_%: Soil's water holding capacity percentage.

Acknowledgments

If your dataset generation was inspired by specific studies, data sources, or methodologies, acknowledge them here.

This is a dataset download, not a document. The Open button will start the download.Detailed soil units from Soils Surveys covering nonfederal land conducted by the U.S. Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) that differentiates mapped units on the basis of a range of physical, topographic, and chemical properties.

This dataset contains high-quality images of soil surfaces categorized into three moisture levels—Wet, Moderate, and Dry—captured under natural outdoor lighting in Sirajganj, Bangladesh. Images were collected at seven time intervals (0 min, 30 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 5 hr, and 7+ hr after saturation) using a Sony Xperia 1 Mark II smartphone. A total of 1,177 raw images were captured, with blurry, noisy, and low-quality photos removed during pre-processing. The dataset reflects real-world agricultural conditions and serves as a benchmark for training machine learning and deep learning models for non-invasive soil moisture classification. Subject Areas: Computer Science, Agriculture Science, AI, Computer Vision, Environmental Monitoring, Pattern Recognition Data Format: JPG images (raw and filtered) Data Collection: Captured using Sony Xperia 1 Mark II under natural outdoor lighting in multiple soil locations. Organized into three labeled categories (Wet, Moderate, Dry) based on time intervals after saturation. Can be split into training and testing sets (recommended 80:20 ratio). Usage Notes: Ideal for developing AI models in soil moisture classification, precision irrigation scheduling, and image-based environmental monitoring. Supports affordable, sensor-free soil analysis for sustainable farming practices, particularly in resource-limited settings.

This data set provides soil maps for the United States (US) (including Alaska), Canada, Mexico, and a part of Guatemala. The map information content includes maximum soil depth and eight soil attributes including sand, silt, and clay content, gravel content, organic carbon content, pH, cation exchange capacity, and bulk density for the topsoil layer (0-30 cm) and the subsoil layer (30-100 cm). The spatial resolution is 0.25 degree. The Unified North American Soil Map (UNASM) combined information from the state-of-the-art US General Soil Map (STATSGO2) and Soil Landscape of Canada (SLCs) databases. The area not covered by these data sets was filled by using the Harmonized World Soil Database version 1.21 (HWSD1.21). The Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon (NCSCD) database was used to provide more accurate and up-to-date soil organic carbon information for the high-latitude permafrost region and was combined with soil organic carbon content derived from the UNASM (Liu et al., 2013). The UNASM data were utilized in the North American Carbon Program (NACP) Multi-Scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP) as model input driver data (Huntzinger et al., 2013). The driver data were used by 22 terrestrial biosphere models to run baseline and sensitivity simulations. The compilation of these data was facilitated by the NACP Modeling and Synthesis Thematic Data Center (MAST-DC). MAST-DC was a component of the NACP (www.nacarbon.org) designed to support NACP by providing data products and data management services needed for modeling and synthesis activities.

For large areas, like Washington State, download as a file geodatabase. Large data sets like this one, for the State of Washington, may exceed the limits for downloading as shape files, excel files, or KML files. For areas less than a county, you may use the map to zoom to your area and download as shape file, excel or KML, if that format is desired.Information for SOILS data layer was derived from the Private Forest Land Grading system (PFLG) and subsequent soil surveys. PFLG was a five-year mapping program completed in 1980 for the purpose of forestland taxation. It was funded by the Washington State Department of Revenue. The Department of Natural Resources, Soil Conservation Service (now known as the Natural Resources Conservation Service or NRCS), USDA Forest Service and Washington State University conducted soil mapping cooperatively following national soil survey standards. Private lands having the potential of supporting commercial forests were surveyed along with interspersed small areas of State lands, Indian tribal lands, and federal lands. Because this was a cooperative soil survey project, agricultural and non-commercial forestlands were included within some survey areas. After the Department of Natural Resources originally developed its geographic information system, digitized soil map unit delineations and a few soil attributes were transferred to the system. Remaining PFLG soil attributes were later added and are now available through associated lookup tables. SCS (NRCS) soils data on agricultural lands also have been subsequently added to this data layer. The SOILS data layer includes approximately 1,100 townships with wholly or partially digitized soils data. State and private lands which have the potential of supporting commercial forest stands were surveyed. Some Indian tribal and federal lands were surveyed. Because this was a cooperative soils survey project, agricultural and non-commercial forestlands were also included within some survey areas. After the Department of Natural Resources originally developed its geographic information system, digitized soils delineations and a few soil attributes were transferred to the system. Remaining PFLG soil attributes were added at a later time and are now available through associated lookup tables. SCS soils data on agricultural lands also have subsequently been added to this data layer. This layer includes approximately 1, 100 townships with wholly or partially digitized soils data (2,101 townships would provide complete coverage of the state of Washington).-

The soils_sv resolves one to many relationships and as such is one of those special "DNR" spatial views ( ie. is implemented similar to a feature class). Column names may not match between SOILS_SV and the originating datasets. Use limitations

This Spatial View is available to Washingotn DNR users and those with access to the Washington State Uplands IMS site.

The following cautions only apply to one-to-many and many-to-many spatial views! Use these in the metadata only if the SV is one-to-many or many-to-many.

CAUTIONS: Area and Length Calculations: Use care when summarizing or totaling area or length calculations from spatial views with one-to-many or many-to-many relationships. One-to-many or many-to-many relationships between tabular and spatial data create multiple features in the same geometry. In other words, if there are two or more records in the table that correspond to the same feature (a single polygon, line or point), the spatial view will contain an identical copy of that feature's geometry for every corresponding record in the table. Area and length calculations should be performed carefully, to ensure they are not being exaggerated by including copies of the same feature's geometry.

Symbolizing Spatial Features:
Use care when symbolizing data in one-to-many or many-to-many spatial views. If there are multiple attributes tied to the same feature, symbolizing with a solid fill may mask other important features within the spatial view. This can be most commonly seen when symbolizing features based on a field with multiple table records.

Labeling Spatial Features: Spatial views with one-to-many or many-to-many relationships may present duplicate labels for those features with multiple table records. This is because there are multiple features in the same geometry, and each one receives a label.Soils Metadata

The International Soil Reference and Information Centre-World Inventory of Soil Emission Potentials (ISRIC-WISE) international soil profile data set consists of a homogenized, global set of 1,125 soil profiles for use by global modelers. These profiles provided the basis for the Global Pedon Database (GPDB) of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) - Data and Information System (DIS). The data set consists of a selection of 665 profiles originating from the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS, Lincoln), 250 profiles obtained from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO, Rome), and 210 profiles from the reference collection of the International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC, Wageningen). All profiles are georeferenced and classified according to the 1974 Legend of the FAO-UNESCO Soil Map (FAC-UNESCO, 1974) of the World, as well as the 1988 Revised Legend of FAO-UNESCO (FAO, 1990). The data set includes information on soil classification, site data, soil horizon data, source of data, and methods used for determining analytical data. The data files are in a comma-delimited format. Data Citation: The data set should be cited as follows: Batjes, N. H. (ed). 2000. Global Soil Profile Data (ISRIC-WISE). Available on-line from the ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A.

A global data set of soil types is available at 0.5-degree latitude by 0.5-degree longitude resolution. There are 106 soil units, based on Zobler?s (1986) assessment of the FAO/UNESCO Soil Map of the World. This data set is a conversion of the Zobler 1-degree resolution version to a 0.5-degree resolution. The resolution of the data set was not actually increased. Rather, the 1-degree squares were divided into four 0.5-degree squares with the necessary adjustment of continental boundaries and islands. The computer code used to convert the original 1-degree data to 0.5-degree is provided as a companion file. A JPG image of the data is provided in this document. The Zobler data (1-degree resolution) as distributed by Webb et al. (1993) [http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/seg/eco/cdroms/gedii_a/datasets/a12/wr.htm#top] contains two columns, one column for continent and one column for soil type. The Soil Map of the World consists of 9 maps that represent parts of the world. The texture data that Webb et al.(1993) provided allowed for the fact that a soil type in one part of the world may have different properties than the same soil in a different part of the world. This continent-specific information is retained in this 0.5-degree resolution data set, as well as the soil type information which is the second column. A code was written (one2half.c) to take the file CONTIZOB.LER distributed by Webb et al. (1993) [http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/seg/eco/cdroms/gedii_a/datasets/a12/wr.htm#top] and simply divide the 1-degree cells into quarters. This code also reads in a land/water file (land.wave) that specifies the cells that are land at 0.5 degrees. The code checks for consistency between the newly quartered map and the land/water map to which the quartered map is to be registered. If there is a discrepancy between the two, an attempt was made to make the two consistent using the following logic. If the cell is supposed to be water, it is forced to be water. If it is supposed to be land but was resolved to water at 1 degree, the code looks at the surrounding 8 cells and picks the most frequent soil type and assigns it to the cell. If there are no surrounding land cells then it is kept as water in the hopes that on the next pass one or more of the surrounding cells might be converted from water to a soil type. The whole map is iterated 5 times. The remaining cells that should be land but couldn't be determined from surrounding cells (mostly islands that are resolved at 0.5 degree but not at 1 degree) are printed out with coordinate information. A temporary map is output with -9 indicating where data is required. This is repeated for the continent code in CONTIZOB.LER as well. A separate map of the temporary continent codes is produced with -9 indicating required data. A nearly identical code (one2half.c) does the same for the continent codes. The printout allows one to consult the printed versions of the soil map and look up the soil type with the largest coverage in the 0.5-degree cell. The program manfix.c then will go through the temporary map and prompt for input to correct both the soil codes and the continent codes for the map. This can be done manually or by preparing a file of changes (new_fix.dat) and redirecting stdin. A new complete version of the map is outputted. This is in the form of the original CONTIZOB.LER file (contizob.half) but four times larger. Original documentation and computer codes prepared by Post et al. (1996) are provided as companion files with this data set. Image of 106 global soil types available at 0.5-degree by 0.5-degree resolution. Additional documentation from Zobler?s assessment of FAO soil units is available from the NASA Center for Scientific Information.

These Soil Mapping Data Packages include 1. a Soil Map dataset which includes the equivalents to Soil Project Boundaries, Soil Survey Spatial View mapping polygons with attributes from the Soil Name and Layer Files, plus + A Soil Site dataset which includes soil pit site information and detailed soil pit descriptions and any associated lab analyses, and + The Soil Data Dictionary which documents the fields and allowable codes within the data. The Soil Map geodatabase contains the 'best available' data ranging from 1:20,000 scale to 1:250,000 scale with overlapping data removed. The choice of the datasets that remain is based on connectivity to the soil attributes (soil name and layer files), map scale and survey date. (Note: the BC Soil Landscapes of Canada (BCSLC) 1:1,000,000 data has not been included in the Soil_Map or SIFT, but is available from: CANSIS. (A complete soils data package with overlapping soil survey mapping and BCSLC is available on request. Note that the soil survey data with attributes can also be viewed interactively in the [Soil Information Finder Tool](The Soil Map dataset is also available for interactive map viewing or as KMZs from the Soil Information Finder Tool website.

This global data set shows the spatial distribution of generalized soil classes as defined for IPCC Tier-I level national greenhouse gas inventory assessments. The database was derived from the Harmonized World Soil Data Base (HWSD ver. 1.1, at scale 1:1-1:5 M) and a series of taxotransfer procedures to convert FAO soil classifications (1974, 1985 and 1990 Legend) to the seven default IPCC soil classes: high activity clay (HAC), low activity clay (LAC), Sandy (SAN), Spodic (POD), Volcanic (VOL), wetlands (WET) and Organic (ORG). The resulting GIS database may be used for exploratory assessments at national and broader scale, for regions that lack more detailed soil information; inherent limitations of the data are discussed in the documentation. This dataset has been compiled in the framework of the GEF co-funded 'Carbon Benefits Project: Measuring, modelling and monitoring', Component A ( http://carbonbenefitsproject-compa.colostate.edu/index.htm). March 2021 (version 1.2): Minor updates were applied for the 'SAN' class; for details see below and download file.

Soil texture classes (USDA system) for 6 soil depths (0, 10, 30, 60, 100 and 200 cm) at 250 m Derived from predicted soil texture fractions using the soiltexture package in R. Processing steps are described in detail here. Antarctica is not included. To access and visualize maps outside of Earth Engine, use this page. If you discover a bug, artifact or inconsistency in the LandGIS maps or if you have a question please use the following channels: Technical issues and questions about the code General questions and comments

The Harmonized World Soil Database version 2.0 (HWSD v2.0) is a unique global soil inventory providing information on the morphological, chemical and physical properties of soils at approximately 1 km resolution. Its main objective is to serve as a basis for prospective studies on agro-ecological zoning, food security and climate change. The Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD) was established in 2008 by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) and FAO, and in partnership with International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC), the European Soil Bureau Network (ESBN) and the Institute for Soil Sciences Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). The data entry and harmonization within a Geographic Information System (GIS) was carried out at IIASA, with verification of the database undertaken by all partners. HWSD was then updated in 2013 (HWSD v1.2) and in 2023 (HWSD v2.0). This updated version (HWSD v2.0) is built on the previous versions of HWSD with several improvements on (i) the data source that now includes several national soil databases, (ii) an enhanced number of soil attributes available for seven soil depth layers, instead of two in HWSD v1.2, and (iii) a common soil reference for all soil units (FAO1990 and the World Reference Base for Soil Resources). This contributes to a further harmonization of the database. The GIS raster image file is linked to the soil attribute database. The HWSD v2.0 soil attribute database provides information on the soil unit composition for each of the near 30 000 soil association mapping units. The HWSD v2.0 Viewer, provided with the database, creates this link automatically and provides direct access to the soil attribute data and the soil association information. Note: - A tutorial for accessing HWSD ver. 2.0 using R (prepared by David Rossiter, June 2023) has been added as an 'associated resource' (NOTE: Needs the SQLite version of HWSD v2 as provided below). - Soil property estimates in HWSDv2 were derived from Batjes (2016), Geoderma (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.01.034).

THE NYSERDA 2025 SOILS DATA IS TO BE USED FOR NYSERDA’S RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARD (RES) REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) ISSUED AFTER THE PUBLICATION OF THIS DATA OR THE NY-SUN PROGRAM AND IS NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT ACTUAL IN SITU SOIL CONDITIONS OR AGRICULTURAL STATUS.

In order to facilitate the protection of agricultural lands, developers participating in RESRFPs or the NY-Sun program may be responsible for making an agricultural mitigation payment to a designated fund based on the extent to which the solar project’s facility area overlaps with an Agricultural District and New York’s highly productive agricultural soils, identified as Mineral Soil Groups (MSG) classifications 1 through 4 (MSG 1-4). This mitigation approach is designed to discourage solar projects from siting on MSG 1-4. Furthermore, this mitigation approach is designed to encourage retaining agricultural productivity on the project site. Instances where Proposers cannot avoid or minimize impacts on MSG 1-4 will result in a payment to a fund administered by NYSERDA. Disbursement of collected agricultural mitigation payment funds will be informed by consultation with the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets (AGM) to support ongoing regional agricultural practices and/or soil conservation initiatives.

Similarly, developers participating in RESRFPs need to submit a Solar Scorecard, and characterize the extent to which their project avoids and minimizes impacts to active agricultural lands, regardless of whether they are in an Agricultural District, and particularly those with highly productive agricultural soils.

This dataset contains a combination of soils data from multiple sources to serve participants of NYSERDA’s Large-Scale Renewable and NY-Sun programs. The NYSERDA 2025 Soils Data was created by converting the 2025 New York State Agricultural Land Classification master list of soils maintained by AGM to a tabular form and providing a corresponding unique identifier for each listed soil that enables the user to link the soils to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) SSURGO soils database, allowing for a geographical representation. When the NYSERDA 2025 Soils Data is joined with spatial data from the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) SSURGO soils database, the corresponding soil unit can be mapped in a geographic information system software. These data are displayed in the web map. The latest version of the SSURGO database should be used to get the most accurate join. Data is updated yearly from both NRCS and from AGM, however, NYSERDA will not update this dataset and it will remain intact for future reference. NYSERDA intends on creating new soils datasets for future procurements on an annual basis. For the Solar Scorecard Agricultural Avoidance Categories, also displayed in the web map and available as a downloadable zipfile, identify MSG 1-4 lands that have potentially been in active agricultural production in the past 5 years, those that have not been but are grasslands or shrub/scrub and not yet succeeded to forest or converted to developed land, and those lands outside of MSG 1-4 that are potentially in active agricultural production. These data were created by combining the National Land Cover Datasets (NLCD) 2023 and 2021 (Pasture/Hay and Crop categories) and the United Stated Department of Agriculture’s Cropland Data Layers (CDL) 2020-2024 with the NYSERDA 2025 Soils Data for use in the Large-Scale Renewables and NY-Sun Programs.

The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) offers objective information and analysis, innovative programs, technical expertise, and support to help New Yorkers increase energy efficiency, save money, use renewable energy, and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. To learn more about NYSERDA’s programs, visit nyserda.ny.gov or follow us on X, Facebook, YouTube, or Instagram.

[Metadata] Hawaii Digital Soil Survey polygons for the State of Hawaii. Downloaded statewide dataset from USDA/NRCS (https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/resources/data-and-reports/gridded-soil-survey-geographic-gssurgo-database) 11/28/23. This dataset is a digital soil survey and generally is the most detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely sensed and other information.This dataset consists of georeferenced digital map data and computerized attribute data. The map data are in a state-wide extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory of soils and miscellaneous areas that normally occur in a repeatable pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at the scale mapped. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the National Soil Information System relational database, which gives the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.For more information, see metadata at https://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/op/gis/data/soils.pdf or contact Hawaii Statewide GIS Program, Office of Planning and Sustainable Development, State of Hawaii; PO Box 2359, Honolulu, Hi. 96804; (808) 587-2846; email: gis@hawaii.gov; Website: https://planning.hawaii.gov/gis.

The data were derived from scanned soil maps. Attributes include a soil number (2-180), corresponding to runoff coefficient values in a Hydrology Manual, provided by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Water Resources Division.Purpose: For use in DPW’s Modified Rational Method Hydrology Model.Supplemental Information:Stormwater Engineering is a Division of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. Please visit their website for posted publications, including the above mentioned Hydrology Manual.