How Does the Tobacco Industry Attempt to Influence Marketing Regulations? A...
- figshare.com
pdfUpdated May 30, 2023
Share
Facebook
Twitter
EmailClick to copy linkLink copiedCiteEmily Savell; Anna B. Gilmore; Gary Fooks (2023). How Does the Tobacco Industry Attempt to Influence Marketing Regulations? A Systematic Review [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087389pdfAvailable download formatsUnique identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087389Dataset updatedMay 30, 2023AuthorsEmily Savell; Anna B. Gilmore; Gary FooksLicenseAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automaticallyDescriptionBackgroundThe Framework Convention on Tobacco Control makes a number of recommendations aimed at restricting the marketing of tobacco products. Tobacco industry political activity has been identified as an obstacle to Parties’ development and implementation of these provisions. This study systematically reviews the existing literature on tobacco industry efforts to influence marketing regulations and develops taxonomies of 1) industry strategies and tactics and 2) industry frames and arguments.MethodsSearches were conducted between April-July 2011, and updated in March 2013. Articles were included if they made reference to tobacco industry efforts to influence marketing regulations; supported claims with verifiable evidence; were written in English; and concerned the period 1990–2013. 48 articles met the review criteria. Narrative synthesis was used to combine the evidence.Results56% of articles focused on activity in North America, Europe or Australasia, the rest focusing on Asia (17%), South America, Africa or transnational activity. Six main political strategies and four main frames were identified. The tobacco industry frequently claims that the proposed policy will have negative unintended consequences, that there are legal barriers to regulation, and that the regulation is unnecessary because, for example, industry does not market to youth or adheres to a voluntary code. The industry primarily conveys these arguments through direct and indirect lobbying, the promotion of voluntary codes and alternative policies, and the formation of alliances with other industrial sectors. The majority of tactics and arguments were used in multiple jurisdictions.ConclusionsTobacco industry political activity is far more diverse than suggested by existing taxonomies of corporate political activity. Tactics and arguments are repeated across jurisdictions, suggesting that the taxonomies of industry tactics and arguments developed in this paper are generalisable to multiple jurisdictions and can be used to predict industry activity.
- w
Global Shisha Outsourcing Service Market Research Report: By Service Type...
- wiseguyreports.com
Updated Oct 14, 2025ShareFacebookTwitterEmailClick to copy linkLink copiedCite(2025). Global Shisha Outsourcing Service Market Research Report: By Service Type (Shisha Supply, Shisha Equipment Rental, Shisha Event Management, Shisha Lounge Management), By Customer Type (Corporate Clients, Event Organizers, Individual Consumers), By Geographic Market (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America), By Usage Occasion (Private Parties, Public Events, Weddings, Corporate Events) and By Regional (North America, Europe, South America, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa) - Forecast to 2035 [Dataset]. https://www.wiseguyreports.com/reports/shisha-outsourcing-service-marketDataset updatedOct 14, 2025Licensehttps://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policyhttps://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policy
Time period coveredOct 25, 2025Area coveredLatin America, GlobalDescriptionBASE YEAR 2024 HISTORICAL DATA 2019 - 2023 REGIONS COVERED North America, Europe, APAC, South America, MEA REPORT COVERAGE Revenue Forecast, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, and Trends MARKET SIZE 2024 1951.2(USD Million) MARKET SIZE 2025 2056.5(USD Million) MARKET SIZE 2035 3500.0(USD Million) SEGMENTS COVERED Service Type, Customer Type, Geographic Market, Usage Occasion, Regional COUNTRIES COVERED US, Canada, Germany, UK, France, Russia, Italy, Spain, Rest of Europe, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Rest of APAC, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Rest of South America, GCC, South Africa, Rest of MEA KEY MARKET DYNAMICS Consumer preference for premium products, Rising demand for traditional experiences, Regulatory challenges in multiple regions, Increasing popularity of social lounges, Growth of online delivery services MARKET FORECAST UNITS USD Million KEY COMPANIES PROFILED Harmless, Starbuzz, Social Smoke, Zahrah, Mya Saray, Haze Tobacco, Nargileh, AlFakher, Pharaoh's, Tangiers, Hookafina, Aqua Mentha, Khalil Mamoon, Nakhla, Pure Tobacco, Fumari MARKET FORECAST PERIOD 2025 - 2035 KEY MARKET OPPORTUNITIES Growing demand for premium shisha, Expansion into emerging markets, Increasing popularity of shisha lounges, Customizable shisha flavors, Integration of online ordering systems COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATE (CAGR) 5.4% (2025 - 2035) 
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
FacebookTwitterEmailHow Does the Tobacco Industry Attempt to Influence Marketing Regulations? A Systematic Review
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
BackgroundThe Framework Convention on Tobacco Control makes a number of recommendations aimed at restricting the marketing of tobacco products. Tobacco industry political activity has been identified as an obstacle to Parties’ development and implementation of these provisions. This study systematically reviews the existing literature on tobacco industry efforts to influence marketing regulations and develops taxonomies of 1) industry strategies and tactics and 2) industry frames and arguments.MethodsSearches were conducted between April-July 2011, and updated in March 2013. Articles were included if they made reference to tobacco industry efforts to influence marketing regulations; supported claims with verifiable evidence; were written in English; and concerned the period 1990–2013. 48 articles met the review criteria. Narrative synthesis was used to combine the evidence.Results56% of articles focused on activity in North America, Europe or Australasia, the rest focusing on Asia (17%), South America, Africa or transnational activity. Six main political strategies and four main frames were identified. The tobacco industry frequently claims that the proposed policy will have negative unintended consequences, that there are legal barriers to regulation, and that the regulation is unnecessary because, for example, industry does not market to youth or adheres to a voluntary code. The industry primarily conveys these arguments through direct and indirect lobbying, the promotion of voluntary codes and alternative policies, and the formation of alliances with other industrial sectors. The majority of tactics and arguments were used in multiple jurisdictions.ConclusionsTobacco industry political activity is far more diverse than suggested by existing taxonomies of corporate political activity. Tactics and arguments are repeated across jurisdictions, suggesting that the taxonomies of industry tactics and arguments developed in this paper are generalisable to multiple jurisdictions and can be used to predict industry activity.