The present study develops an equilibrium displacement model (EDM) to evaluate the impacts of a free trade agreement (FTA) on the profits of individual farmers. The parameters representing the share of profit within revenue and the elasticity of cost with respect to quantity in the cost function play key roles in assessing the change in individual farmers’ profit. The application of the developed EDM to assess the impacts of the Korea–Chile FTA indicates that this FTA has little impact on the Korean grape market and grape producers in Korea.

I derive a novel solution for the general equilibrium effects of tariffs that is robust to heterogeneity across industries and countries, and is a function of only aggregate trade data and country-by-industry Pareto shape parameters. Using the model to evaluate tariff shocks, I show that while most countries lose by removing observed tariffs unilaterally, India, Japan, Korea, and the United States gain by doing so, which suggests inefficient tariff discrimination. In evaluating multilateral shocks, observed tariff cuts over 1994–2000 benefit 69 percent of countries, with these benefits skewed toward developing nations. In contrast, removing all post-2000 tariffs benefit the developed. (JEL F12, F13, F14)

Hyundai Steel declares emergency confronting U.S. tariffs and intense competition, exploring cost-cutting strategies including salary cuts and potential U.S. plant establishment to support NA operations.

U.S. Tariff Impact on the RF GaN Market

The implementation of U.S. tariffs in early 2025 has significantly influenced the RF GaN market, particularly affecting the semiconductor and defense sectors. A notable 25% tariff was imposed on semiconductor imports from countries like China, South Korea, and Taiwan, which are key suppliers of RF GaN components.

This tariff has led to increased production costs for U.S.-based manufacturers and defense contractors, potentially impacting profit margins and delaying project timelines.

➤ Discover how our research uncovers business opportunities @ https://market.us/report/rf-gan-market/free-sample/

Moreover, the imposition of tariffs has disrupted global supply chains, prompting companies to seek alternative sourcing options and invest in domestic manufacturing capabilities to mitigate risks associated with tariff-induced uncertainties. These adjustments, while necessary, may lead to short-term cost escalations and operational challenges as companies navigate the evolving trade landscape.

Economic Impact

• Increased Production Costs: Tariffs have raised component prices by up to 25%, impacting profit margins.
• Supply Chain Disruptions: Global supply chains have been affected, leading to delays and increased costs.
• Investment Shifts: Companies are reallocating investments towards domestic manufacturing to mitigate tariff impacts.

Geographical Impact

• North America: Faces significant cost increases due to tariffs on imported components.
• Asia-Pacific: Potential growth as companies look to diversify manufacturing and reduce reliance on tariff-affected regions.
• Europe: Manufacturers may seek alternative markets or adjust supply chains to mitigate tariff impacts.

Business Impact

• Operational Challenges: Higher costs may result in reduced profit margins and operational efficiency.
• Strategic Reassessment: Companies may need to reevaluate sourcing and manufacturing strategies to navigate the new trade landscape.
• Market Entry Barriers: New entrants may face increased costs and regulatory hurdles due to tariffs.

Key Takeaways

• U.S. tariffs have increased production costs in the RF GaN market.
• Trade policy uncertainties are causing investment delays and supply chain disruptions.
• Manufacturers and operators must adapt strategies to mitigate tariff impacts.

<!-- /wp:...

Flexible Capacity Tariff Platform Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global Flexible Capacity Tariff Platform market size reached USD 1.82 billion in 2024, driven by the increasing demand for dynamic energy pricing and grid flexibility. The market is registering a robust CAGR of 13.7% from 2025 to 2033, and is forecasted to reach a value of USD 5.98 billion by 2033. This strong growth is primarily attributed to the accelerating adoption of smart grid technologies, regulatory support for demand response, and the proliferation of distributed energy resources across both developed and emerging economies.

One of the primary growth factors for the Flexible Capacity Tariff Platform market is the global transition towards renewable energy sources and the subsequent need for more agile and responsive grid management. As solar, wind, and other intermittent renewables contribute a larger share to the energy mix, grid operators and energy providers are under increasing pressure to balance supply and demand in real-time. Flexible capacity tariff platforms enable dynamic pricing and demand response, which incentivize consumers to adjust their consumption patterns based on grid conditions. This not only helps in optimizing grid stability but also reduces the need for costly peaking power plants, thus driving market adoption across all major regions.

Another significant factor propelling the growth of the Flexible Capacity Tariff Platform market is the rapid digital transformation within the energy sector. The deployment of IoT-enabled smart meters, advanced analytics, and artificial intelligence has made it feasible to implement real-time pricing models and manage distributed energy resources more efficiently. Utilities and grid operators are increasingly investing in these platforms to enhance operational efficiency, reduce energy wastage, and provide customized tariff plans to their customers. Furthermore, the integration of these platforms with home automation systems and electric vehicle charging infrastructure is opening new avenues for value-added services, further stimulating market growth.

In addition to technological advancements, regulatory frameworks and policy incentives are playing a crucial role in the expansion of the Flexible Capacity Tariff Platform market. Governments worldwide are introducing mandates and incentives for demand-side management and grid flexibility to support their decarbonization goals. For instance, Europe’s Clean Energy Package and similar initiatives in North America and Asia Pacific are encouraging utilities to adopt flexible capacity solutions. This regulatory push, coupled with the growing awareness among consumers about energy efficiency and cost savings, is accelerating the adoption of these platforms across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors.

From a regional perspective, North America and Europe currently dominate the Flexible Capacity Tariff Platform market, collectively accounting for more than 60% of the global market share in 2024. However, Asia Pacific is emerging as the fastest-growing region, driven by rapid urbanization, increasing energy demand, and significant investments in smart grid infrastructure. Countries such as China, Japan, and South Korea are at the forefront of deploying flexible tariff solutions, supported by strong government policies and a burgeoning renewable energy sector. Meanwhile, Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are gradually adopting these platforms, primarily through pilot projects and regulatory reforms aimed at modernizing their grid infrastructure.

Component Analysis

The Component segment of the Flexible Capacity Tariff Platform market is categorized into software, hardware, and services, each playing a pivotal role in the overall ecosystem. Software solutions form the backbone of these platforms, enabling real-time data analytics, automated tariff adjustments, and seamless integration with other digital grid management tools. The software segment is wi

US Tariff Impact on Market

The US tariffs on semiconductor-related materials and equipment are creating significant disruption in the global AMHS market. The semiconductor industry, which has a considerable reliance on international trade, faces rising costs due to tariffs. In particular, the impact of the 25% tariff on Chinese imports has led to delays in production timelines and higher costs of manufacturing for semiconductor companies.

➤ Discover how our research uncovers business opportunities @ https://market.us/report/amhs-for-semiconductor-market/free-sample/

According to the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA), these tariffs increase the overall cost structure, impacting innovation and slowing the growth of new technologies in the semiconductor sector. The global supply chain faces uncertainty, and countries relying on US-China trade are experiencing volatility in prices and product availability. This can lead to an increase in semiconductor prices globally.

Economic Impact

The tariffs increase costs for manufacturers, which could translate into higher prices for end consumers. This may affect the profitability of companies in the semiconductor supply chain and ultimately reduce the competitiveness of the US in the global semiconductor market.

Geographical Impact

Regions reliant on Chinese manufacturing, like Asia-Pacific, may face higher costs due to tariffs. The increased cost of manufacturing may divert demand to regions like Europe or South Korea, where production costs are comparatively lower.

Business Impact

The tariffs have led businesses to re-evaluate their supply chains and consider alternative sourcing strategies, which could lead to longer lead times and less flexibility in production. This could slow growth in the semiconductor market, especially for US-based firms.

The USD/KRW exchange rate fell to 1,387.8500 on August 1, 2025, down 0.33% from the previous session. Over the past month, the South Korean Won has weakened 2.33%, and is down by 2.19% over the last 12 months. South Korean Won - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on August of 2025.

IntroductionTrade plays a pivotal role in maintaining global grain security. However, the grain trade network (GTN) within Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) member countries remains unclear. Analyzing grain flow characteristics and the agreement’s potential impacts are essential to fostering resilient economic and trade cooperation within the world’s largest free trade area.MethodsThis study constructed a trade network analysis framework incorporating complex network topology, competition intensity, interdependence intensity, and robustness. It examined the grain trade patterns and coopetition relationships from 2000 to 2020. Building on this, the study created the “Five Forces” model to analyze evolutionary mechanisms in the GTN and explored the potential impacts of trade agreements through trade diversion and creation effects.Results(1) The GTN has grown increasingly complex and interconnected, with key nodes exhibiting trends toward homogenization. By 2020, Australia, Viet Nam, Myanmar, Thailand, and Cambodia collectively accounted for 95.70% of total exports, emerging as major grain exporters in the GTN. (2) The GTN exhibits high competition and low interdependence. Populous countries with constrained arable land resources, such as China, Philippines, Malaysia, South Korea, and Indonesia, face intense import competition. Concerns over external supply security have led to diversified trade behaviors among member countries, fostering a trade pattern characterized by low interdependence (87.23%). (3) The robustness of the GTN has significantly improved due to the complexity of network structures and the homogenization of key node positions. Countries such as Thailand and Australia, with high Betweenness centrality values, play crucial roles in maintaining stability. Meanwhile, Viet Nam and China, as major import–export countries, are exerting growing influence in the GTN. (4) The evolution of the GTN is shaped by the interactive effects of five key forces: resource endowments, domestic demand, economic conditions, geopolitical relations, and important events. Differentiated tariff reduction commitments and reduced non-tariff measures are expected to generate trade diversion and creation effects. Such policy measures may reallocate intra-regional trade flows and expand trade volumes while intensifying import competition.DiscussionFrom a complex network perspective, this study provides valuable policy insights for RCEP member countries to leverage their strengths and participate more effectively in agricultural trade.

In 2023, electronics, computers, and components exports had the largest value amongst Vietnam's major commodities, at approximately **** billion U.S. dollars. Meanwhile, phones and related components contributed around **** billion U.S. dollars to total export earnings that year.Vietnam – An export-driven country Vietnam had greatly increased its volume and value of international trade since implementing economic reforms, or Đổi Mới in 1986. After Đổi Mới, Vietnam's trade balance recorded its first trade surplus in 2012 at around *** million U.S. dollars. In 2019, Vietnam saw a negative growth rate of worldwide exports for the first time since 2010, with a total export value reaching over ****** billion U.S. dollars that year. The country’s main export partners include the United States, the European Union, China, Japan, and South Korea.International trade agreements In 2019, Vietnam signed several significant trade agreements such as the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EVFTA), which led to the reduction of tariffs and customs duties for both Vietnam and the European Union, as well as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), which not only gave Canada access to the Vietnamese market, but also facilitated the integration of Vietnam in the global value chain.