15 datasets found
  1. d

    ScienceBase Item Summary Page

    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey, ScienceBase Item Summary Page [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/eceb05dfc1764317890d9470ff336866/html
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Area covered
    Description

    Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

  2. s

    ScienceBase Item Summary Page

    • cinergi.sdsc.edu
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey, ScienceBase Item Summary Page [Dataset]. http://cinergi.sdsc.edu/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/d3a52519f4a14ef686ce00023213a264/html
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Area covered
    Description

    Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

  3. scounty100: County boundaries of the Southern United States at 1:100,000...

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    bin
    Updated Jan 22, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    M. Negri; Edwin Yockey (2025). scounty100: County boundaries of the Southern United States at 1:100,000 scale [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2009-0001
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Servicehttp://fs.fed.us/
    Authors
    M. Negri; Edwin Yockey
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States, Southern United States
    Description

    This coverage was identified on the USGS Water Resources NSDI Node site at https://nsdi.usgs.gov. The coverage contains the county boundaries of the continental United States. These boundaries were derived from the Digital Line Graph (DLG) files representing the 1:100,000 scale map in the National Atlas of the United States. The data was then modified by USDA Forest Service Personnel for use in the Southern Forest Resource Assessment and exported to a shapefile.This shapefile is used as a base map for a variety of applications.Metadata was updated 10/1/2009 when data became available through this archive, and again on 2/8/2011 to add a DOI to citation. Data were not altered. Minor metadata updates made on 4/18/2013, 12/20/2016, and 09/09/2021.

    Data were originally made available at https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/sustain/data/.

  4. a

    County Boundaries

    • arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com
    • gis-pdx.opendata.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated May 24, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Portland, Oregon (2023). County Boundaries [Dataset]. https://arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/PDX::county-boundaries/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 24, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Portland, Oregon
    Area covered
    Description

    This data is maintained by and obtained from Metro GIS. Click the link above to view the Metro GIS metadata for this dataset.

    This data is maintained by and obtained from Metro Data Resource Center. Please go to https://gis.oregonmetro.gov/rlis-metadata/#/details/155 for the complete metadata.-- Additional Information: Category: Boundary Purpose: For use as a "base" layer on map products to shade county areas and in analysis to capture areas within each county. Update Frequency: None planned-- Metadata Link: https://www.portlandmaps.com/metadata/index.cfm?&action=DisplayLayer&LayerID=155

  5. e

    Data from: 2019-2022 10-m maize and soybean maps over the United States

    • experts.esf.edu
    • figshare.com
    Updated May 6, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Haijun Li; Xiao-peng Song; Bernard Adusei; Jeffrey Pickering; Andre de Lima; Andrew Poulson; Antoine Baggett; Peter Potapov; Ahmad Khan; Viviana Zalles; Andres Hernandez-Serna; Samuel M. Jantz; Amy H. Pickens; Carolina Ortiz-Dominguez; Xinyuan Li; Theodore Kerr; Zhen Song; Svetlana Turubanova; Eddy Bongwele; Heritier Koy Kondjo; Anna Komarova; Stephen V. Stehman; Matthew C. Hansen (2025). 2019-2022 10-m maize and soybean maps over the United States [Dataset]. https://experts.esf.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/2019-2022-10-m-maize-and-soybean-maps/99972815304826
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 6, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Authors
    Haijun Li; Xiao-peng Song; Bernard Adusei; Jeffrey Pickering; Andre de Lima; Andrew Poulson; Antoine Baggett; Peter Potapov; Ahmad Khan; Viviana Zalles; Andres Hernandez-Serna; Samuel M. Jantz; Amy H. Pickens; Carolina Ortiz-Dominguez; Xinyuan Li; Theodore Kerr; Zhen Song; Svetlana Turubanova; Eddy Bongwele; Heritier Koy Kondjo; Anna Komarova; Stephen V. Stehman; Matthew C. Hansen
    Time period covered
    May 6, 2025
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    High-resolution crop maps over large spatial extents are fundamental to many agricultural applications; however, generating high-quality crop maps consistently across space and time remains a challenge. In this study, we improved a workflow for operational crop mapping and developed the first openly available, annual, 10-m spatial resolution maize and soybean maps over the Contiguous United States (CONUS) from 2019 to 2022. We obtained all available Sentinel-2 surface reflectance data between May and October for every year, applied quality assurance, corrected the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) effects, and generated 10-day analysis ready data (ARD) composites. We then derived multi-temporal metrics from the 10-day ARD as training features for the national-scale wall-to-wall mapping. We implemented a stratified, two-stage cluster sampling, and then conducted annual field surveys and collected ground data. Utilizing the training data with Sentinel-2 multi-temporal metrics, we trained random forest models generalized for annual maize and soybean classification separately. Validated using field data from the two-stage cluster sample, our annual maps achieved consistent overall accuracies (OA) greater than 95% with standard errors of less than 1%. User’s accuracies (UAs) and producer’s accuracies (PAs) for maize were higher than 91% and 84% across the years, and UAs and PAs for soybean were greater than 88% and 82%, respectively. To illustrate the substantial improvement of the 10-m map over existing datasets, e.g., the 30-m Cropland Data Layer (CDL), we aggregated the 10-m maps to 30-m spatial resolution and quantified the amount of 30-m mixed pixels that can be reduced at field, regional, and national levels. The counties with the most maize and soybean production in Iowa, Illinois and Nebraska had the lowest reduction in mixed pixels, ranging from 1% to 10%, whereas southern counties had a higher reduction in mixed pixels. Overall, the median percentages of mixed maize and soybean pixels across all counties were 14% and 16%, respectively, illustrating the substantial benefits of 10-m maps over 30-m maps. With more Sentinel-2-like data available from continuous observations and incoming satellite missions, we anticipate that 10-m crop maps will greatly benefit long-term monitoring for agricultural practices from the field to global scales.

  6. Worked at Home 2018-2022 - COUNTIES

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • covid19-uscensus.hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Feb 4, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    US Census Bureau (2024). Worked at Home 2018-2022 - COUNTIES [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/USCensus::worked-at-home-2018-2022-counties/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 4, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    Authors
    US Census Bureau
    Area covered
    Description

    This layer shows Commuting to Work. This is shown by state and county boundaries. This service contains the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. This layer is symbolized to show Population that worked at home. To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2018-2022ACS Table(s): DP03Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: January 18, 2024National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:Boundaries come from the Cartographic Boundaries via US Census TIGER geodatabases. Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates, and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines clipped for cartographic purposes. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters). The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico. The Counties (and equivalent) layer contains 3221 records - all counties and equivalent, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico municipios. See Areas Published. Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells.Margin of error (MOE) values of -555555555 in the API (or "*****" (five asterisks) on data.census.gov) are displayed as 0 in this dataset. The estimates associated with these MOEs have been controlled to independent counts in the ACS weighting and have zero sampling error. So, the MOEs are effectively zeroes, and are treated as zeroes in MOE calculations. Other negative values on the API, such as -222222222, -666666666, -888888888, and -999999999, all represent estimates or MOEs that can't be calculated or can't be published, usually due to small sample sizes. All of these are rendered in this dataset as null (blank) values.

  7. d

    Geospatial data for groundwater potentiometric-surface maps in northeastern...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.usgs.gov
    Updated Jul 6, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2024). Geospatial data for groundwater potentiometric-surface maps in northeastern Hamilton, southern Meigs, and northwestern Bradley Counties, Tennessee, fall 1992, spring and fall 1993, summer 2008, and spring 2009 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/geospatial-data-for-groundwater-potentiometric-surface-maps-in-northeastern-hamilton-south
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Description

    This dataset includes a Microsoft Excel file, and a .csv and a .txt version of the Excel file, that contain location and groundwater-level data for wells open to the Valley and Ridge carbonate aquifer of Cambrian-Ordovician age in the area of Savannah and Gunstocker Creeks in northeastern Hamilton, southern Meigs, and northwestern Bradley Counties, Tennessee, for fall 1992, spring and fall 1993, summer 2008, and spring 2009 conditions. Potentiometric-surface contour data for the five measurement periods also are included as separate Earth Sciences Research Institute (ESRI) ArcGIS shapefiles. The data were collected as parts of studies conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in cooperation with the Chattanooga/Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission, the City of Chattanooga, Hamilton County, the Hamilton County Association of Utility Districts, and the Savannah Valley Utility District (SVUD). The well and water-level data also are available from the USGS National Water Information System (NWIS).

  8. d

    Digital Database for the Preliminary Geologic Map of the Southern Santa Rosa...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.usgs.gov
    Updated Jul 6, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2024). Digital Database for the Preliminary Geologic Map of the Southern Santa Rosa Mountains and Borrego Badlands, San Diego County, Southern California [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/digital-database-for-the-geologic-map-of-the-southern-santa-rosa-mountains-and-borrego-bad
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Area covered
    San Diego County, Santa Rosa Mountains, Borrego Badlands, California, Southern California
    Description

    This digital map database represents the general distribution of bedrock and surficial geologic units, and related data in the Fonts Point and Seventeen Palms 7.5’ quadrangles, California. The database delineates map units that are identified by general age and lithology following the stratigraphic nomenclature of the U.S. Geological Survey. This investigation delineates the geologic framework of an area of 75 square kilometers (km2) located west of the Salton Sea in southern California. The study area encompasses the south flank of the Santa Rosa Mountains and the eastern part of the Borrego Badlands. In this study area, regionally important stratigraphic and structural elements collectively inform the late Cenozoic geologic evolution of the Anza-Borrego sector of the Salton Trough province. This geodatabase contains all of the map information used to publish the Preliminary Geologic Map of the Southern Santa Rosa Mountains and Borrego Badlands, San Diego County, Southern California Pettinga, J.R., Dudash, S.L., and Cossette, P.M., 2023, Preliminary Geologic Map of the Southern Santa Rosa Mountains and Borrego Badlands, San Diego County, Southern California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2023–1076, scale 1:12,000, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20231076.

  9. California City Boundaries and Identifiers

    • data.ca.gov
    • gis.data.ca.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Feb 26, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Technology (2025). California City Boundaries and Identifiers [Dataset]. https://data.ca.gov/dataset/california-city-boundaries-and-identifiers
    Explore at:
    gdb, csv, zip, txt, xlsx, geojson, kml, arcgis geoservices rest api, html, gpkgAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 26, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Department of Technologyhttp://cdt.ca.gov/
    Area covered
    California City
    Description

    WARNING: This is a pre-release dataset and its fields names and data structures are subject to change. It should be considered pre-release until the end of March 2025. The schema changed in February 2025 - please see below. We will post a roadmap of upcoming changes, but service URLs and schema are now stable. For deployment status of new services in February 2025, see https://gis.data.ca.gov/pages/city-and-county-boundary-data-status. Additional roadmap and status links at the bottom of this metadata.

    This dataset is continuously updated as the source data from CDTFA is updated, as often as many times a month. If you require unchanging point-in-time data, export a copy for your own use rather than using the service directly in your applications.

    Purpose

    City boundaries along with third party identifiers used to join in external data. Boundaries are from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA). These boundaries are the best available statewide data source in that CDTFA receives changes in incorporation and boundary lines from the Board of Equalization, who receives them from local jurisdictions for tax purposes. Boundary accuracy is not guaranteed, and though CDTFA works to align boundaries based on historical records and local changes, errors will exist. If you require a legal assessment of boundary location, contact a licensed surveyor.

    This dataset joins in multiple attributes and identifiers from the US Census Bureau and Board on Geographic Names to facilitate adding additional third party data sources. In addition, we attach attributes of our own to ease and reduce common processing needs and questions. Finally, coastal buffers are separated into separate polygons, leaving the land-based portions of jurisdictions and coastal buffers in adjacent polygons. This feature layer is for public use.

    Related Layers

    This dataset is part of a grouping of many datasets:

    1. Cities: Only the city boundaries and attributes, without any unincorporated areas
    2. Counties: Full county boundaries and attributes, including all cities within as a single polygon
    3. Cities and Full Counties: A merge of the other two layers, so polygons overlap within city boundaries. Some customers require this behavior, so we provide it as a separate service.
    4. City and County Abbreviations
    5. Unincorporated Areas (Coming Soon)
    6. Census Designated Places
    7. Cartographic Coastline

    Working with Coastal Buffers
    The dataset you are currently viewing excludes the coastal buffers for cities and counties that have them in the source data from CDTFA. In the versions where they are included, they remain as a second polygon on cities or counties that have them, with all the same identifiers, and a value in the COASTAL field indicating if it"s an ocean or a bay buffer. If you wish to have a single polygon per jurisdiction that includes the coastal buffers, you can run a Dissolve on the version that has the coastal buffers on all the fields except OFFSHORE and AREA_SQMI to get a version with the correct identifiers.

    Point of Contact

    California Department of Technology, Office of Digital Services, odsdataservices@state.ca.gov

    Field and Abbreviation Definitions

    • CDTFA_CITY: CDTFA incorporated city name
    • CDTFA_COUNTY: CDTFA county name. For counties, this will be the name of the polygon itself. For cities, it is the name of the county the city polygon is within.
    • CDTFA_COPRI: county number followed by the 3-digit city primary number used in the Board of Equalization"s 6-digit tax rate area numbering system. The boundary data originate with CDTFA's teams managing tax rate information, so this field is preserved and flows into this dataset.
    • CENSUS_GEOID: numeric geographic identifiers from the US Census Bureau
    • CENSUS_PLACE_TYPE: City, County, or Town, stripped off the census name for identification purpose.
    • GNIS_PLACE_NAME: Board on Geographic Names authorized nomenclature for area names published in the Geographic Name Information System
    • GNIS_ID: The numeric identifier from the Board on Geographic Names that can be used to join these boundaries to other datasets utilizing this identifier.
    • CDT_CITY_ABBR: Abbreviations of incorporated area names - originally derived from CalTrans Division of Local Assistance and now managed by CDT. Abbreviations are 4 characters. Not present in the county-specific layers.
    • CDT_COUNTY_ABBR: Abbreviations of county names - originally derived from CalTrans Division of Local Assistance and now managed by CDT. Abbreviations are 3 characters.
    • CDT_NAME_SHORT: The name of the jurisdiction (city or county) with the word "City" or "County" stripped off the end. Some changes may come to how we process this value to make it more consistent.
    • AREA_SQMI: The area of the administrative unit (city or county) in square miles, calculated in EPSG 3310 California Teale Albers.
    • OFFSHORE: Indicates if the polygon is a coastal buffer. Null for land polygons. Additional values include "ocean" and "bay".
    • PRIMARY_DOMAIN: Currently empty/null for all records. Placeholder field for official URL of the city or county
    • CENSUS_POPULATION: Currently null for all records. In the future, it will include the most recent US Census population estimate for the jurisdiction.
    • GlobalID: While all of the layers we provide in this dataset include a GlobalID field with unique values, we do not recommend you make any use of it. The GlobalID field exists to

  10. a

    Carteret County Map Book

    • arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com
    • gisdata-cc-gis.opendata.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Oct 3, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Carteret County GIS (2018). Carteret County Map Book [Dataset]. https://arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com/documents/CC-GIS::carteret-county-map-book/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 3, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Carteret County GIS
    Area covered
    Carteret County
    Description

    Map book of Carteret County, NC showing roads, addresses and points of interest

  11. a

    Data from: County Boundary

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jul 13, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Milwaukee County GIS & Land Information (2016). County Boundary [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/MCLIO::county-boundary
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 13, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Milwaukee County GIS & Land Information
    Area covered
    Description

    ************************In early 2025, the source of MCLIO public layers will change.*****************************Please refer to these documents for changes: https://mclio.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=0bb68bbae37445adb045d6a44fed3f2a https://mclio.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=79c6c9d737c94753a388db7c6f480149Please update maps, apps and data connections accordingly!This layer shows the political boundary of Milwaukee County.

  12. a

    Palm Beach County Boundary

    • arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com
    • opendata2-pbcgov.opendata.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Feb 1, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Palm Beach County GIS (2018). Palm Beach County Boundary [Dataset]. https://arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com/maps/PBCGOV::palm-beach-county-boundary
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 1, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Palm Beach County GIS
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    Purpose of this data set is to show the geographic boundary of Palm Beach County.

  13. s

    Data from: Geologic map of the Big Timber Stock and vicinity, southern Crazy...

    • cinergi.sdsc.edu
    htm
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Geologic map of the Big Timber Stock and vicinity, southern Crazy Mountains, Sweet Grass and Park counties, south-central Montana [Dataset]. http://cinergi.sdsc.edu/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/b29397f2ad95455ab7873e1eaae5dfcc/html
    Explore at:
    htmAvailable download formats
    Area covered
    Description

    no abstract provided

  14. d

    ScienceBase Item Summary Page

    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey, ScienceBase Item Summary Page [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/e6dc63bcfa344a219d37e2a0e3ec7598/html
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Area covered
    Description

    Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

  15. d

    ScienceBase Item Summary Page

    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey, ScienceBase Item Summary Page [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/0546cf7410d64aba839363700c7ff0ef/html
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Area covered
    Description

    Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

  16. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
U.S. Geological Survey, ScienceBase Item Summary Page [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/eceb05dfc1764317890d9470ff336866/html

ScienceBase Item Summary Page

USGS High Resolution Orthoimagery for Southern Counties, MS: 15RYR485310 200701 0x6000m CL 1

Explore at:
Dataset provided by
United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
Area covered
Description

Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu