As of June 2024, almost a hundred percent of the licenses for spatial database management systems (DBMSs) were open source licenses. Over the years, open source DBMSs have become more and more popular. As of the evaluated period, open source DBMSs have become as popular as commercial ones.

The Database Management System (DBMS) market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing adoption of cloud computing, big data analytics, and the expanding digital transformation initiatives across various industries. The market, estimated at $80 billion in 2025, is projected to witness a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12% from 2025 to 2033, reaching a market value exceeding $200 billion by 2033. This growth is fueled by the rising demand for efficient data management solutions across large enterprises and SMEs. Key trends include the increasing adoption of NoSQL databases for handling unstructured data, the migration to cloud-based DBMS solutions for enhanced scalability and cost-effectiveness, and the growing focus on data security and compliance. The market segmentation reveals a significant share held by the large enterprise segment, driven by their need for robust and scalable solutions. Database operation management constitutes a major segment within the application space, highlighting the growing importance of efficient database administration. While the market presents significant opportunities, certain restraints are anticipated. These include the complexities associated with data migration, integration, and management across diverse platforms. Furthermore, the need for skilled professionals to manage and maintain these complex systems represents a crucial challenge. However, the ongoing innovation in areas like AI-powered database management tools and automation are mitigating these concerns to some extent. The competitive landscape is characterized by established players like Oracle, Microsoft, IBM, and emerging players providing cloud-based solutions like Amazon and Google. The European market, encompassing key regions like the UK, Germany, and France, represents a significant contributor to the overall market growth, fueled by a high concentration of technology-driven businesses and strong government initiatives supporting digitalization.

Students learn about the importance of good data management and begin to explore QGIS and RStudio for spatial analysis purposes. Students will explore National Land Cover Database raster data and made-up vector point data on both platforms.

The data, codes and queries to accompany the paper "Multipurpose temporal GIS model for cadastral data management". Full details of the designs and use of queries are explained in the paper

This is a set of spatial data sets which can use for discovering spatial co-location patterns.

The Embedded Database Management Systems (EDBMS) market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for data management solutions within resource-constrained devices and applications. The market, estimated at $2.5 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated $7 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. The proliferation of IoT devices, requiring efficient and localized data storage and processing, is a major catalyst. Furthermore, the rise of edge computing, which emphasizes data processing closer to the source, necessitates the use of embedded databases. Demand for real-time analytics and faster processing speeds in applications like industrial automation, automotive, and healthcare further enhances market growth. Major players like Microsoft, IBM, Oracle, and others are actively involved in developing and improving their EDBMS offerings, fostering innovation and competition within the sector. While data security concerns and the complexity of integrating embedded databases into existing systems represent potential challenges, the overall market outlook remains positive, indicating significant growth opportunities in the foreseeable future. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established players and niche providers. Established players like Microsoft, IBM, and Oracle leverage their existing enterprise database technologies to extend their reach into the embedded space, offering robust solutions with extensive features. Smaller, specialized vendors like Centura Software, Software AG, Informix, and PointBase often cater to specific industry needs or offer specialized functionalities. Future growth will likely be shaped by advancements in database technologies such as NoSQL and in-memory databases, further enhancing the capabilities of embedded solutions. The geographical distribution of the market is expected to see growth across all major regions, with North America and Europe leading initially, followed by a rise in adoption across Asia-Pacific and other emerging markets as these regions experience increased industrial automation and IoT deployments.

The USGS Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is the nation's inventory of protected areas, including public land and voluntarily provided private protected areas, identified as an A-16 National Geospatial Data Asset in the Cadastre Theme ( https://ngda-cadastre-geoplatform.hub.arcgis.com/ ). The PAD-US is an ongoing project with several published versions of a spatial database including areas dedicated to the preservation of biological diversity, and other natural (including extraction), recreational, or cultural uses, managed for these purposes through legal or other effective means. The database was originally designed to support biodiversity assessments; however, its scope expanded in recent years to include all open space public and nonprofit lands and waters. Most are public lands owned in fee (the owner of the property has full and irrevocable ownership of the land); however, permanent and long-term easements, leases, agreements, Congressional (e.g. 'Wilderness Area'), Executive (e.g. 'National Monument'), and administrative designations (e.g., 'Area of Critical Environmental Concern') documented in agency management plans are also included. The PAD-US strives to be a complete inventory of U.S. public land and other protected areas, compiling “best available” data provided by managing agencies and organizations. PAD-US provides a full inventory geodatabase, spatial analysis, statistics, data downloads, web services, poster maps, and data submissions included in efforts to track global progress toward biodiversity protection. PAD-US integrates spatial data to ensure public lands and other protected areas from all jurisdictions are represented. PAD-US version 4.0 includes new and updated data from the following data providers. All other data were transferred from previous versions of PAD-US. Federal updates - The USGS remains committed to updating federal fee owned lands data and major designation changes in regular PAD-US updates, where authoritative data provided directly by managing agencies are available or alternative data sources are recommended. Revisions associated with the federal estate in this version include updates to the Federal estate (fee ownership parcels, easement interest, management designations, and proclamation boundaries), with authoritative data from 7 agencies: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Census Bureau (Census Bureau), Department of Defense (DOD), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), National Park Service (NPS), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS). The federal theme in PAD-US is developed in close collaboration with the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Federal Lands Working Group (FLWG, https://ngda-gov-units-geoplatform.hub.arcgis.com/pages/federal-lands-workgroup/ ). This includes improved the representation of boundaries and attributes for the National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lands, in collaboration with agency data-stewards, in response to feedback from the PAD-US Team and stakeholders. Additionally, National Cemetery boundaries were added using geospatial boundary data provided by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and NASA boundaries were added using data contained in the USGS National Boundary Dataset (NBD). State Updates - USGS is committed to building capacity in the state data steward network and the PAD-US Team to increase the frequency of state land and NGO partner updates, as resources allow. State Lands Workgroup ( https://ngda-gov-units-geoplatform.hub.arcgis.com/pages/state-lands-workgroup ) is focused on improving protected land inventories in PAD-US, increase update efficiency, and facilitate local review. PAD-US 4.0 included updates and additions from the following seventeen states and territories: California (state, local, and nonprofit fee); Colorado (state, local, and nonprofit fee and easement); Georgia (state and local fee); Kentucky (state, local, and nonprofit fee and easement); Maine (state, local, and nonprofit fee and easement); Montana (state, local, and nonprofit fee); Nebraska (state fee); New Jersey (state, local, and nonprofit fee and easement); New York (state, local, and nonprofit fee and easement); North Carolina (state, local, and nonprofit fee); Pennsylvania (state, local, and nonprofit fee and easement); Puerto Rico (territory fee); Tennessee (land trust fee); Texas (state, local, and nonprofit fee); Virginia (state, local, and nonprofit fee); West Virginia (state, local, and nonprofit fee); and Wisconsin (state fee data). Additionally, the following datasets were incorporated from NGO data partners: Trust for Public Land (TPL) Parkserve (new fee and easement data); The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Lands (fee owned by TNC); TNC Northeast Secured Areas; Ducks Unlimited (land trust fee); and the National Conservation Easement Database (NCED). All state and NGO easement submissions are provided to NCED. For more information regarding the PAD-US dataset please visit, https://www.usgs.gov/programs/gap-analysis-project/science/protected-areas . For more information regarding the PAD-US dataset please visit, https://www.usgs.gov/programs/gap-analysis-project/science/protected-areas . For more information about data aggregation please review the PAD-US Data Manual available at https://www.usgs.gov/programs/gap-analysis-project/pad-us-data-manual . A version history of PAD-US updates is summarized below (See https://www.usgs.gov/programs/gap-analysis-project/pad-us-data-history/ for more information): 1) First posted - April 2009 (Version 1.0 - available from the PAD-US: Team pad-us@usgs.gov). 2) Revised - May 2010 (Version 1.1 - available from the PAD-US: Team pad-us@usgs.gov). 3) Revised - April 2011 (Version 1.2 - available from the PAD-US: Team pad-us@usgs.gov). 4) Revised - November 2012 (Version 1.3) https://doi.org/10.5066/F79Z92XD 5) Revised - May 2016 (Version 1.4) https://doi.org/10.5066/F7G73BSZ 6) Revised - September 2018 (Version 2.0) https://doi.org/10.5066/P955KPLE 7) Revised - September 2020 (Version 2.1) https://doi.org/10.5066/P92QM3NT 8) Revised - January 2022 (Version 3.0) https://doi.org/10.5066/P9Q9LQ4B 9) Revised - April 2024 (Version 4.0) https://doi.org/10.5066/P96WBCHS Comparing protected area trends between PAD-US versions is not recommended without consultation with USGS as many changes reflect improvements to agency and organization GIS systems, or conservation and recreation measure classification, rather than actual changes in protected area acquisition on the ground.

The establishment of a BES Multi-User Geodatabase (BES-MUG) allows for the storage, management, and distribution of geospatial data associated with the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. At present, BES data is distributed over the internet via the BES website. While having geospatial data available for download is a vast improvement over having the data housed at individual research institutions, it still suffers from some limitations. BES-MUG overcomes these limitations; improving the quality of the geospatial data available to BES researches, thereby leading to more informed decision-making. BES-MUG builds on Environmental Systems Research Institute's (ESRI) ArcGIS and ArcSDE technology. ESRI was selected because its geospatial software offers robust capabilities. ArcGIS is implemented agency-wide within the USDA and is the predominant geospatial software package used by collaborating institutions. Commercially available enterprise database packages (DB2, Oracle, SQL) provide an efficient means to store, manage, and share large datasets. However, standard database capabilities are limited with respect to geographic datasets because they lack the ability to deal with complex spatial relationships. By using ESRI's ArcSDE (Spatial Database Engine) in conjunction with database software, geospatial data can be handled much more effectively through the implementation of the Geodatabase model. Through ArcSDE and the Geodatabase model the database's capabilities are expanded, allowing for multiuser editing, intelligent feature types, and the establishment of rules and relationships. ArcSDE also allows users to connect to the database using ArcGIS software without being burdened by the intricacies of the database itself. For an example of how BES-MUG will help improve the quality and timeless of BES geospatial data consider a census block group layer that is in need of updating. Rather than the researcher downloading the dataset, editing it, and resubmitting to through ORS, access rules will allow the authorized user to edit the dataset over the network. Established rules will ensure that the attribute and topological integrity is maintained, so that key fields are not left blank and that the block group boundaries stay within tract boundaries. Metadata will automatically be updated showing who edited the dataset and when they did in the event any questions arise. Currently, a functioning prototype Multi-User Database has been developed for BES at the University of Vermont Spatial Analysis Lab, using Arc SDE and IBM's DB2 Enterprise Database as a back end architecture. This database, which is currently only accessible to those on the UVM campus network, will shortly be migrated to a Linux server where it will be accessible for database connections over the Internet. Passwords can then be handed out to all interested researchers on the project, who will be able to make a database connection through the Geographic Information Systems software interface on their desktop computer. This database will include a very large number of thematic layers. Those layers are currently divided into biophysical, socio-economic and imagery categories. Biophysical includes data on topography, soils, forest cover, habitat areas, hydrology and toxics. Socio-economics includes political and administrative boundaries, transportation and infrastructure networks, property data, census data, household survey data, parks, protected areas, land use/land cover, zoning, public health and historic land use change. Imagery includes a variety of aerial and satellite imagery. See the readme: http://96.56.36.108/geodatabase_SAL/readme.txt See the file listing: http://96.56.36.108/geodatabase_SAL/diroutput.txt

Spatial analysis and statistical summaries of the Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) provide land managers and decision makers with a general assessment of management intent for biodiversity protection, natural resource management, and outdoor recreation access across the nation. This data release presents results from statistical summaries of the PAD-US 4.0 protection status (by GAP Status Code) and public access status for various land unit boundaries (PAD-US 4.0 Vector Analysis and Summary Statistics). Summary statistics are also available to explore and download from the PAD-US Statistics Dashboard ( https://www.usgs.gov/programs/gap-analysis-project/science/pad-us-statistics ). The vector GIS analysis file, source data used to summarize statistics for areas of interest to stakeholders (National, State, Department of the Interior Region, Congressional District, County, EcoRegions I-IV, Urban Areas, Landscape Conservation Cooperative), and complete Summary ...

The Database Operation and Maintenance Management System (DOMMS) market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing complexity of database environments and the rising demand for efficient database administration. The market's expansion is fueled by several key factors, including the proliferation of cloud-based database solutions, the growing adoption of DevOps methodologies, and the increasing need for robust data security and compliance. Businesses across all sizes, from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to large enterprises, are recognizing the importance of streamlined database management to improve operational efficiency, reduce downtime, and optimize performance. The on-premise segment currently holds a significant market share, but the cloud-based segment is witnessing the most rapid growth, driven by its scalability, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility. This shift towards cloud-based solutions is expected to continue over the forecast period, transforming the market landscape. Geographical distribution shows a strong presence in North America and Europe, reflecting the higher adoption rates of advanced technologies in these regions. However, the Asia-Pacific region is emerging as a key growth area, propelled by rapid digitalization and increasing investments in IT infrastructure. While the market faces challenges like the initial investment costs associated with implementing new DOMMS solutions and the need for skilled professionals, the overall growth trajectory remains positive. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established players like Oracle and emerging innovative companies, leading to continuous improvement and innovation in the DOMMS space. The forecast period of 2025-2033 promises significant expansion, with the market poised to capitalize on the increasing demand for robust and efficient database management solutions across various sectors. This will likely result in increased mergers and acquisitions activity, further consolidating the market and accelerating innovation.

The Autonomous and Intelligent Database Management Service (AIDBMS) market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing need for self-managing, scalable, and secure database solutions. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to witness a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 18% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $50 billion by 2033. This surge is fueled by several key factors. The rising adoption of cloud computing and the need for faster data processing and analytics are significantly boosting demand. Enterprises are increasingly embracing AI-powered database solutions to automate routine tasks, improve operational efficiency, and gain valuable insights from their data. Furthermore, the inherent security features of autonomous databases are attracting organizations seeking to mitigate risks associated with traditional database management systems. Major technology players like Oracle, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, IBM, SAP, and Cockroach Labs are actively investing in R&D and expanding their offerings in this space, intensifying competition and fueling innovation. The market segmentation is evolving, with cloud-based deployments gaining significant traction over on-premise solutions. The geographical distribution shows a strong presence in North America and Europe, but rapid growth is anticipated in Asia-Pacific and other emerging markets due to increasing digitalization efforts. However, challenges such as the high initial investment cost and the need for skilled professionals to manage and maintain these advanced systems are potential restraints. Nevertheless, the long-term benefits of increased efficiency, reduced operational costs, and improved data security are expected to outweigh these challenges, leading to sustained market expansion in the coming years. The evolution of AI and machine learning capabilities within these systems will further drive innovation and market growth in the long term.

Currently, the state-of-the-art in space asset tracking and information management is bar-coding with relational database support. To support NASA's need for reliable and low-cost asset management, Payload Systems Inc. and MIT propose to develop Rule-based Analytic Asset Management for Space Exploration Systems (RAMSES) ? an intelligent space exploration environment in which information is shared and automatically harmonized among disparate data sources. This information is then combined with mathematical models and rule-based analysis to produce meaningful data for asset tracking and intelligent decisions. The combined data will communicate with analytic models that provide analyses, estimates, predictions and plans. This intelligent space exploration environment will be equipped with sensors, radio frequency identification (RFID) equipment and sophisticated information infrastructures to make full use of multiple data streams.

Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

Abstract : The search for the most appropriate GIS data model to integrate, manipulate and analyse spatio-temporal data raises several research questions about the conceptualisation of geographic spaces. Although there is now a general consensus that many environmental phenomena require field and object conceptualisations to provide a comprehensive GIS representation, there is still a need for better integration of these dual representations of space within a formal spatio-temporal database. The research presented in this paper introduces a hybrid and formal dual data model for the representation of spatio-temporal data. The whole approach has been fully implemented in PostgreSQL and its spatial extension PostGIS, where the SQL language is extended by a series of data type constructions and manipulation functions to support hybrid queries. The potential of the approach is illustrated by an application to underwater geomorphological dynamics oriented towards the monitoring of the evolution of seabed changes. A series of performance and scalability experiments are also reported to demonstrate the computational performance of the model.Data Description : The data set used in our research is a set of bathymetric surveys recorded over three years from 2009 to 2011 as Digital Terrain Models (DTM) with 2m grid spacing. The first survey was carried out in February 2009 by the French hydrographic office, the second one was recorded on August-September 2010 and the third in July 2011, both by the “Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer”.

The USGS Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is the nation's inventory of protected areas, including public open space and voluntarily provided, private protected areas, identified as an A-16 National Geospatial Data Asset in the Cadastral Theme (http://www.fgdc.gov/ngda-reports/NGDA_Datasets.html). PAD-US is an ongoing project with several published versions of a spatial database of areas dedicated to the preservation of biological diversity, and other natural, recreational or cultural uses, managed for these purposes through legal or other effective means. The geodatabase maps and describes public open space and other protected areas. Most areas are public lands owned in fee; however, long-term easements, leases, and agreements or administrative designations documented in agency management plans may be included. The PAD-US database strives to be a complete “best available” inventory of protected areas (lands and waters) including data provided by managing agencies and organizations. The dataset is built in collaboration with several partners and data providers (http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/stewards/). See Supplemental Information Section of this metadata record for more information on partnerships and links to major partner organizations. As this dataset is a compilation of many data sets; data completeness, accuracy, and scale may vary. Federal and state data are generally complete, while local government and private protected area coverage is about 50% complete, and depends on data management capacity in the state. For completeness estimates by state: http://www.protectedlands.net/partners. As the federal and state data are reasonably complete; focus is shifting to completing the inventory of local gov and voluntarily provided, private protected areas. The PAD-US geodatabase contains over twenty-five attributes and four feature classes to support data management, queries, web mapping services and analyses: Marine Protected Areas (MPA), Fee, Easements and Combined. The data contained in the MPA Feature class are provided directly by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Marine Protected Areas Center (MPA, http://marineprotectedareas.noaa.gov ) tracking the National Marine Protected Areas System. The Easements feature class contains data provided directly from the National Conservation Easement Database (NCED, http://conservationeasement.us ) The MPA and Easement feature classes contain some attributes unique to the sole source databases tracking them (e.g. Easement Holder Name from NCED, Protection Level from NOAA MPA Inventory). The "Combined" feature class integrates all fee, easement and MPA features as the best available national inventory of protected areas in the standard PAD-US framework. In addition to geographic boundaries, PAD-US describes the protection mechanism category (e.g. fee, easement, designation, other), owner and managing agency, designation type, unit name, area, public access and state name in a suite of standardized fields. An informative set of references (i.e. Aggregator Source, GIS Source, GIS Source Date) and "local" or source data fields provide a transparent link between standardized PAD-US fields and information from authoritative data sources. The areas in PAD-US are also assigned conservation measures that assess management intent to permanently protect biological diversity: the nationally relevant "GAP Status Code" and global "IUCN Category" standard. A wealth of attributes facilitates a wide variety of data analyses and creates a context for data to be used at local, regional, state, national and international scales. More information about specific updates and changes to this PAD-US version can be found in the Data Quality Information section of this metadata record as well as on the PAD-US website, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/data/history/.) Due to the completeness and complexity of these data, it is highly recommended to review the Supplemental Information Section of the metadata record as well as the Data Use Constraints, to better understand data partnerships as well as see tips and ideas of appropriate uses of the data and how to parse out the data that you are looking for. For more information regarding the PAD-US dataset please visit, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/. To find more data resources as well as view example analysis performed using PAD-US data visit, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/resources/. The PAD-US dataset and data standard are compiled and maintained by the USGS Gap Analysis Program, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/ . For more information about data standards and how the data are aggregated please review the “Standards and Methods Manual for PAD-US,” http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/data/standards/ .

Group of movement trajectories of couriers operating in London, UK.

This dataset is a collection of courier trajectories, captured principally around London over a continuous eight week period. This is a useful example of real movement trajectories, which could potentially be used for benchmarking or for the development of spatio-temporal analytics. In addition to the principle data file,which contains 9,917,703 discrete data points, sixteen different spatial and temporal summaries have been included in the related experiment to aid analysis.

The savannas of the Kenya-Tanzania borderland cover >100,000 km2 and is one of the most important regions globally for biodiversity conservation, particularly large mammals. The region also supports >1 million pastoralists and their livestock. In these systems, resources for both large mammals and pastoralists (i.e. green grass) are highly variable in space and time and thus require connected landscapes. However, ongoing fragmentation of (semi-)natural vegetation by smallholder fencing and expansion of agriculture threatens this social-ecological system. Spatial data on fences and agricultural expansion are localised and dispersed among data owners and databases. Here, we synthesised data from several research groups and conservation NGOs and present the Landscape Dynamics (landDX) spatial-temporal database. The data includes 31,000 livestock enclosures, nearly 40,000 kilometres of fencing, and 1,500 km2 of agricultural land. We provide caveats and interpretation of the different methodologies used. These data are useful to answer fundamental ecological questions; to quantify the rate of change of ecosystem function and wildlife populations, for conservation and livestock management; and for local and governmental spatial planning.

In order to improve the capacity of storage, exploration and processing of sensor data, a spatial DBMS was used and the Aquopts system was implemented.

In field surveys using different sensors on the aquatic environment, the existence of spatial attributes in the dataset is common, motivating the adoption of PostgreSQL and its spatial extension PostGIS. To enable the insertion of new data sets as well as new devices and sensing equipment, the database was modeled to support updates and provide structures for storing all the data collected in the field campaigns in conjunction with other possible future data sources. The database model provides resources to manage spatial and temporal data and allows flexibility to select and filter the dataset.

The data model ensures the storage integrity of the information related to the samplings performed during the field survey in an architecture that benefits the organization and management of the data. However, in addition to the storage specified on the data model, there are several procedures that need to be applied to the data to prepare it for analysis. Some validations are important to identify spurious data that may represent important sources of information about data quality. Other corrections are essential to tweak the data and eliminate undesirable effects. Some equations can be used to produce other factors that can be obtained from the combination of attributes. In general, the processing steps comprise a cycle of important operations that are directly related to the characteristics of the data set. Considering the data of the sensors stored in the database, an interactive prototype system, named Aquopts, was developed to perform the necessary standardization and basic corrections and produce useful data for analysis, according to the correction methods known in the literature.

The system provides resources for the analyst to automate the process of reading, inserting, integrating, interpolating, correcting, and other calculations that are always repeated after exporting field campaign data and producing new data sets. All operations and processing required for data integration and correction have been implemented from the PHP and Python language and are available from a Web interface, which can be accessed from any computer connected to the internet. The data access cab be access online (http://sertie.fct.unesp.br/aquopts), but the resources are restricted by registration and permissions for each user. After their identification, the system evaluates the access permissions and makes available the options of insertion of new datasets.

The source-code of the entire Aquopts system are available at: https://github.com/carmoafc/aquopts

The system and additional results were described on the official paper (under review)

The Database Solutions market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing adoption of cloud-based solutions and the expanding need for data management in large enterprises and SMEs. The market, valued at approximately $150 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12% from 2025 to 2033. This significant growth is fueled by several key factors. The shift towards cloud computing offers scalability, cost-effectiveness, and enhanced accessibility, leading to widespread adoption of cloud-based database solutions. Furthermore, the exponential growth of data generated by businesses across various sectors necessitates robust and efficient database management systems. The rise of big data analytics and artificial intelligence further fuels demand, as organizations require advanced database solutions to handle and process massive datasets for insightful decision-making. While the on-premise segment still holds a significant share, the cloud-based segment is rapidly gaining traction, projected to dominate the market in the coming years. Competition among major players like IBM, Amazon, Oracle, Microsoft, and SAP, along with emerging players in the space, is driving innovation and fostering a competitive landscape. However, challenges remain, including data security concerns, the complexity of integrating diverse database systems, and the need for skilled professionals to manage these increasingly sophisticated technologies. The segmentation of the market reveals distinct growth patterns. Large enterprises, with their substantial data management needs, represent a larger market segment compared to SMEs. However, the SME segment is also experiencing significant growth as businesses of all sizes recognize the importance of data-driven decision-making. Geographically, North America and Europe currently hold the largest market shares, driven by early adoption and established technological infrastructure. However, Asia-Pacific is emerging as a rapidly expanding market, fueled by strong economic growth and increasing digitalization across countries like China and India. The overall market is expected to continue its upward trajectory, driven by technological advancements, increasing data volumes, and the growing need for efficient data management across all sectors. The forecast period of 2025-2033 promises substantial opportunities for both established and emerging players in the Database Solutions market.

NOTE: A more current version of the Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is available: PAD-US 2.0 https://doi.org/10.5066/P955KPLE. The USGS Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is the nation's inventory of protected areas, including public open space and voluntarily provided, private protected areas, identified as an A-16 National Geospatial Data Asset in the Cadastral Theme (http://www.fgdc.gov/ngda-reports/NGDA_Datasets.html). PAD-US is an ongoing project with several published versions of a spatial database of areas dedicated to the preservation of biological diversity, and other natural, recreational or cultural uses, managed for these purposes through legal or other effective means. The geodatabase maps and describes public open space and other protected areas. Most areas are public lands owned in fee; however, long-term easements, leases, and agreements or administrative designations documented in agency management plans may be included. The PAD-US database strives to be a complete “best available” inventory of protected areas (lands and waters) including data provided by managing agencies and organizations. The dataset is built in collaboration with several partners and data providers (http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/stewards/). See Supplemental Information Section of this metadata record for more information on partnerships and links to major partner organizations. As this dataset is a compilation of many data sets; data completeness, accuracy, and scale may vary. Federal and state data are generally complete, while local government and private protected area coverage is about 50% complete, and depends on data management capacity in the state. For completeness estimates by state: http://www.protectedlands.net/partners. As the federal and state data are reasonably complete; focus is shifting to completing the inventory of local gov and voluntarily provided, private protected areas. The PAD-US geodatabase contains over twenty-five attributes and four feature classes to support data management, queries, web mapping services and analyses: Marine Protected Areas (MPA), Fee, Easements and Combined. The data contained in the MPA Feature class are provided directly by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Marine Protected Areas Center (MPA, http://marineprotectedareas.noaa.gov ) tracking the National Marine Protected Areas System. The Easements feature class contains data provided directly from the National Conservation Easement Database (NCED, http://conservationeasement.us ) The MPA and Easement feature classes contain some attributes unique to the sole source databases tracking them (e.g. Easement Holder Name from NCED, Protection Level from NOAA MPA Inventory). The "Combined" feature class integrates all fee, easement and MPA features as the best available national inventory of protected areas in the standard PAD-US framework. In addition to geographic boundaries, PAD-US describes the protection mechanism category (e.g. fee, easement, designation, other), owner and managing agency, designation type, unit name, area, public access and state name in a suite of standardized fields. An informative set of references (i.e. Aggregator Source, GIS Source, GIS Source Date) and "local" or source data fields provide a transparent link between standardized PAD-US fields and information from authoritative data sources. The areas in PAD-US are also assigned conservation measures that assess management intent to permanently protect biological diversity: the nationally relevant "GAP Status Code" and global "IUCN Category" standard. A wealth of attributes facilitates a wide variety of data analyses and creates a context for data to be used at local, regional, state, national and international scales. More information about specific updates and changes to this PAD-US version can be found in the Data Quality Information section of this metadata record as well as on the PAD-US website, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/data/history/.) Due to the completeness and complexity of these data, it is highly recommended to review the Supplemental Information Section of the metadata record as well as the Data Use Constraints, to better understand data partnerships as well as see tips and ideas of appropriate uses of the data and how to parse out the data that you are looking for. For more information regarding the PAD-US dataset please visit, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/. To find more data resources as well as view example analysis performed using PAD-US data visit, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/resources/. The PAD-US dataset and data standard are compiled and maintained by the USGS Gap Analysis Program, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/ . For more information about data standards and how the data are aggregated please review the “Standards and Methods Manual for PAD-US,” http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/data/standards/ .