The SCAR Spatial Data Model has been developed for Geoscience Standing Scientific Group (GSSG). It was presented to XXVII SCAR, 15-26 July 2002, in Shanghai, China.

The Spatial Data Model is one of nine projects of the Geographic Information Program 2000-2002. The goal of this project is 'To provide a SCAR standard spatial data model for use in SCAR and national GIS databases.'

Activities within this project include:

1. Continue developing the SCAR Feature Catalogue and the SCAR Spatial Data Model
2. Provide SCAR Feature Catalogue online
3. Creation and incorporation of symbology
4. Investigate metadata / data quality requirements
5. Ensure compliance to ISO TC211 and OGC standards

Source: http://www.geoscience.scar.org/geog/geog.htm#stds

Spatial data are increasingly being available in digital form, managed in a GIS and distributed on the web. More data are being exchanged between nations/institutions and used by a variety of disciplines. Exchange of data and its multiple use makes it necessary to provide a standard framework. The Feature Catalogue is one component of the Spatial Data Model, that will provide the platform for creating understandable and accessible data to users. Care has been taken to monitor the utility of relevant emerging ISO TC211 standards.

The Feature Catalogue provides a detailed description of the nature and the structure of GIS and map information. It follows ISO/DIS 19110, Geographic Information - Methodology for feature cataloguing. The Feature Catalogue can be used in its entirety, or in part. The Feature Catalogue is a dynamic document, that will evolve with use over time. Considerable effort has gone into ensuring that the Feature Catalogue is a unified and efficient tool that can be used with any GIS software and at any scale of geographic information.

The structure includes data quality information, terminology, database types and attribute options that will apply to any GIS. The Feature Catalogue is stored in a database to enable any component of the information to be easily viewed, printed, downloaded and updated via the Web.

Digital data of 3D models featuring geometry model, texture map and textual attribute to represent the geometrical shape, appearance and position of three types of ground objects i.e. Building, Infrastructure and Terrain in Max, 3ds, FBX and VRML formats.

These data (vector and raster) were compiled for spatial modeling of salinity yield sources in the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB) and describe different scales of watersheds in the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB) for use in salinity yield modeling. Salinity yield refers to how much dissolved salts are picked up in surface waters that could be expected to be measured at the watershed outlet point annually. The vector polygons are small catchments developed originally for use in SPARROW modeling that break up the UCRB into 10,789 catchments linked together through a synthetic stream network. The catchments were used for a machine learning based salinity model and attributed with the new results in these vector GIS datasets. Although all of these feature classes include the same polygons, the attribute tables for each include differing outputs from new salinity models and a comparison with SPARROW model results from previous research. The new model presented in these datasets utilizes new predictive soil maps and a more flexible random forest function to improve on previous UCRB salinity spatial models. The raster data layers represent aspects of soils, topography, climate, and runoff characteristics that have hypothesized influences on salinity yields.

This paper provides an abstract analysis of parallel processing strategies for spatial and spatio-temporal data. It isolates aspects such as data locality and computational locality as well as redundancy and locally sequential access as central elements of parallel algorithm design for spatial data. Furthermore, the paper gives some examples from simple and advanced GIS and spatial data analysis highlighting both that big data systems have been around long before the current hype of big data and that they follow some design principles which are inevitable for spatial data including distributed data structures and messaging, which are, however, incompatible with the popular MapReduce paradigm. Throughout this discussion, the need for a replacement or extension of the MapReduce paradigm for spatial data is derived. This paradigm should be able to deal with the imperfect data locality inherent to spatial data hindering full independence of non-trivial computational tasks. We conclude that more research is needed and that spatial big data systems should pick up more concepts like graphs, shortest paths, raster data, events, and streams at the same time instead of solving exactly the set of spatially separable problems such as line simplifications or range queries in manydifferent ways.

Golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) nest site model spatial data and maps as described in Dunk JR, Woodbridge B, Lickfett TM, Bedrosian G, Noon BR, LaPlante DW, et al. (2019) Modeling spatial variation in density of golden eagle nest sites in the western United States. PLoS ONE 14(9): e0223143. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223143

Within the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), three-dimensional (3D) geologic models are created as part of geologic framework studies, to support energy, minerals, or water resource assessments, and to inform geologic hazard assessments. Such models are often used within the organization as digital input into process and predictive models. 3D geological modeling typically supports research and project work within a specific part of the USGS – called Mission Areas – and as a result, 3D modeling activities are decentralized and model results are released on a project-by-project basis. This digital data release inventories and catalogs, for the first time, 3D geological models constructed by the USGS across all Mission Areas. This inventory assembles in catalog form the spatial locations and salient characteristics of previously published USGS 3D geological models. This inventory covers the time period from 2004, the date of the earliest published model through 2022. This digital dataset contains spatial extents of the 3D geologic models as polygon features that are attributed with unique identifiers that link the spatial data to nonspatial tables that define the data sources used and describe various aspects of each published model. The nonspatial DataSources table includes full citation and URL address for both published model reports and any digital model data released as a separate publication. The nonspatial ModelAttributes table classifies the type of model, using several classification schemes, identifies the model purpose and originating agency, and describes the spatial extent, depth, and number of layers included in each model. A tabular glossary defines terms used in the dataset. A tabular data dictionary describes the entity and attribute information for all attributes of the geospatial data and the accompanying nonspatial tables.

In order to improve the capacity of storage, exploration and processing of sensor data, a spatial DBMS was used and the Aquopts system was implemented.

In field surveys using different sensors on the aquatic environment, the existence of spatial attributes in the dataset is common, motivating the adoption of PostgreSQL and its spatial extension PostGIS. To enable the insertion of new data sets as well as new devices and sensing equipment, the database was modeled to support updates and provide structures for storing all the data collected in the field campaigns in conjunction with other possible future data sources. The database model provides resources to manage spatial and temporal data and allows flexibility to select and filter the dataset.

The data model ensures the storage integrity of the information related to the samplings performed during the field survey in an architecture that benefits the organization and management of the data. However, in addition to the storage specified on the data model, there are several procedures that need to be applied to the data to prepare it for analysis. Some validations are important to identify spurious data that may represent important sources of information about data quality. Other corrections are essential to tweak the data and eliminate undesirable effects. Some equations can be used to produce other factors that can be obtained from the combination of attributes. In general, the processing steps comprise a cycle of important operations that are directly related to the characteristics of the data set. Considering the data of the sensors stored in the database, an interactive prototype system, named Aquopts, was developed to perform the necessary standardization and basic corrections and produce useful data for analysis, according to the correction methods known in the literature.

The system provides resources for the analyst to automate the process of reading, inserting, integrating, interpolating, correcting, and other calculations that are always repeated after exporting field campaign data and producing new data sets. All operations and processing required for data integration and correction have been implemented from the PHP and Python language and are available from a Web interface, which can be accessed from any computer connected to the internet. The data access cab be access online (http://sertie.fct.unesp.br/aquopts), but the resources are restricted by registration and permissions for each user. After their identification, the system evaluates the access permissions and makes available the options of insertion of new datasets.

The source-code of the entire Aquopts system are available at: https://github.com/carmoafc/aquopts

The system and additional results were described on the official paper (under review)

The ORNL DAAC Spatial Data Access Tool (SDAT) is a suite of Web-based applications that enable users to visualize and download spatial data in user-selected spatial/temporal extents, file formats, and projections. SDAT incorporates Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) standard Web services, including Web Coverage Service (WCS), Web Map Service (WMS), and Web Feature Service (WFS). The SDAT provides ORNL DAAC-archived data sets and additional relevant data products including agriculture, atmosphere, biosphere, climate indicators, human dimensions, land surface, oceans, terrestrial hydrosphere data types, and related model output data sets.

The goal of this paper is to present a new model of fuzzy topological relations for simple spatial objects in Geographic Information Sciences (GIS). The concept of computational fuzzy topological space is applied to simple fuzzy objects to efficiently and more accurately solve fuzzy topological relations, extending and improving upon previous research in this area. Firstly, we propose a new definition for simple fuzzy line segments and simple fuzzy regions based on computational fuzzy topology. And then, we also propose a new model to compute fuzzy topological relations between simple spatial objects, an analysis of the new model exposes:(1) the topological relations of two simple crisp objects; (2) the topological relations between one simple crisp object and one simple fuzzy object; (3) the topological relations between two simple fuzzy objects. In the end, we have discussed some examples to demonstrate the validity of the new model, through an experiment and comparisons of existing models, we showed that the proposed method can make finer distinctions, as it is more expressive than the existing fuzzy models.

No description is available. Visit https://dataone.org/datasets/doi%3A10.18739%2FA2VV3P for complete metadata about this dataset.

Existing methods for calculating directional relations in polygons (i.e. the directional similarity model, the cone-based model, and the modified cone-based model) were compared to human perceptions of change through an online survey. The results from this survey provide the first empirical validation of computational approaches to calculating directional relations in polygonal spatial data. We have found that while the evaluated methods generally agreed with each other, they varied in their alignment with human perceptions of directional relations. Specifically, translation transformations of the target and reference polygons showed greatest discrepancy to human perceptions and across methods. The online survey was developed using Qualtrics Survey Software, and participants were recruited via online messaging on social media (i.e., Twitter) with hashtags related to geographic information science. In total sixty-one individuals responded to the survey. This survey consisted of nine questions. For the first question, participants indicated how many years they have worked with GIS and/or spatial data. For the remaining eight questions, participants ranked pictorial database scenes according to degrees of their match to query scenes. Each of these questions represented a test case that Goyal and Egenhofer (2001) used to empirically evaluate the directional similarity model; participants were randomly presented with four of these questions. The query scenes were created using ArcMap and contained a pair of reference and target polygons. The database scenes were generated by gradually changing the geometry of the target polygon within each query scene. The relations between the target and reference polygon varied by the type of movement, the scaling change of the polygon, and changes in rotation. The scenarios were varied in order to capture a representative range of variability in polygon movements and changes in real world data. The R statistical computing environment was used to determine the similarity value that corresponds with each database scene based on the directional similarity model, the cone-based model, and the modified cone-based model. Using the survey responses, the frequency of first, second, third, etc. ranks were calculated for each database scene. Weight variables were multiplied by the frequencies to create an overall rank based on participant responses. A rank of one was weighted as a five, a rank of two was weighted as a four, and so on. Spearman’s rank-order correlation was used to measure the strength and direction of association between the rank determined using the three models and the rank determined using participant responses.

The final aim for this practical is to create a 3D model to visualise how a flood depth of 1m might impact buildings within flood alert areas in Shrewsbury, including a potential new building we are going to create a simple 3D model for. By the end of the exercises in this practical you should be able to use Arc Online Apps to create a 3D model that looks like this -The learning objectives for making this model are as follows:Be able to open and navigate in the Map ViewerBe able to find and add suitable data into Map ViewerBe able to create datasets that allow you to perform visual analysis to understand why areas may have been identified as flood risk areasBe able to build a query to identify and extract building data for buildings within the Flood Alert AreaBe able to create a model to represent a potential new buildingBe able to use Scene Viewer to put this all together in a 3D model that allows you visualise this data

With the help of local and regional natural resource professionals, we developed a broad-scale, spatially-explicit assessment of 146 miles (~20,000 acres) of the Colorado River mainstem in Grand and San Juan Counties, Utah that can be used to support conservation planning and riparian restoration prioritization. For the assessment we: 1) acquired, modified or created spatial datasets of Colorado River bottomland conditions; 2) synthesized those datasets into habitat suitability models and estimates of natural recovery potential, fire risk and relative cost; 3) investigated and described dominant ecosystem trends and human uses, and; 4) suggested site selection and prioritization approaches. Here, we make available to the public spatial data associated with this work. The data include 51 shape files: 6 of these are related to fluvial geomorphology and hydrology; 1 contains riparian vegetation and surrounding land cover types; 30 are related to habitat or conservation element models (including model components and model results); and 14 are related to supplemental models including the relative cost of restoration, site recovery potential, and fire models. The data released here are associated with a publication that describes the project and results in more detail: Rasmussen, C.G., and P.B. Shafroth. 2016. Conservation planning for the Colorado River in Utah. Colorado Mesa University, Ruth Powell Hutchins Water Center, Scientific and Technical Report No. 3. 93p.

This U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) data release consists of two hydrographic datasets with spatial modeling units, two sets of spatial data consistent with the National Hydrologic Model (NHM) Geospatial Fabric for National Hydrologic Modeling (abbreviated within this document as GFv1, Viger and Bock, 2014), and a database of 118 parameters used to run the NHM . These datasets are found as subpages to this landing page as 1) the GIS (geographic information system) features of the United States-Canada Transboundary Geospatial Fabric (TGF, added 08/04/2020), 2) the GIS features of the Geospatial Fabric v1.1 (GFv1.1 or v1_1, added 08/04/2020) which is an update to the GF and includes the TGF, 3) Topographic derivative datasets for the United States-Canada transboundary Geospatial Fabric (added 10/28/2020), 4) Data Layers for the National Hydrologic Model, version 1.1, and 5) National Hydrologic Model's United States-Canada Transboundary Geospatial Fabric Parameter Database (added 11/10/2021). See subpages for more details.

The Arctic Slope Shoreline Change Risk Spatial Data Model consists of shoreline change susceptibility information from the Arctic Slope Shoreline Change Susceptibility Spatial Data Model (Brady 2017) summarized at asset locations defined by a local community-verified Arctic Slope at-risk asset spatial data model. Specifically, this data product is shoreline change susceptibility information added to attribute tables of a variety of asset spatial data for at-risk coastal Arctic Slope assets. The purpose of the data is to identify shoreline change risk to assets of interest to stakeholders selected during an Instructional Systems Design (ISD) process to develop a shoreline change risk WebGIS in collaboration with the North Slope Borough.

[Brady, M. (2017). Arctic Slope Shoreline Change Susceptibility Spatial Data Model. NSF Arctic Data Center. arctic-data.10114.1.]

Our dataset delivers unprecedented scale and diversity for geospatial AI training:

🌍 Massive scale: 165,000 unique 3D map sequences and locations, 82,000,000 images, 0.73 PB of Data, orders of magnitude larger than datasets currently used for SOTA Vision/Spatial Models.

⏱️ Constantly growing dataset: 12k new 3D Map sequences and locations monthly.

📷 Full-frame, high-res captures: OVER retains full-resolution, dynamic aspect-ratio images with complete Exif metadata (GPS, timestamp, device orientation), multiple resolutions 1920x1080 - 3840x2880, pre-computed COLMAP poses.

🧭 Global diversity: Environments span urban, suburban, rural, and natural settings across 120+ countries, capturing architectural, infrastructural, and environmental variety.

📐 Rich metadata: Per-image geolocation (±3 m accuracy), timestamps, device pose, COLMAP pose; per-map calibration data (camera intrinsics/extrinsics).

🧠 Applications: Spatial Models Training, Multi-view stereo & NeRF/3DGS training, semantic segmentation, novel view synthesis, 3D object detection, geolocation, urban planning, AR/VR, autonomous navigation.

🤗 1k Scenes Sample: You can access our 1,000-scene sample under the CC-BY-NC license at this link: https://huggingface.co/datasets/OverTheReality/OverMaps_1k

The final aim for this practical is to create a 3D model to visualise how a flood depth of 1m might impact buildings within areas at risk from a 1 in 200 year flood event in Fife. These areas are defined by The Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) as medium flood risk areas. By the end of the exercises in this practical you should be able to use Arc Online Apps to create a 3D model that looks like this and highlights the buildings within the medium flood risk areas -The learning objectives for making this model are as follows:Be able to open and navigate in the Map ViewerBe able to find and add suitable data into Map ViewerBe able to create datasets that allow you to perform visual analysis to understand why areas may have been identified as flood risk areasBe able to build a query to identify and extract building data for buildings within the medium flood risk areasBe able to use Scene Viewer to put this all together in a 3D model that allows you visualise this data

Model performance on spatial simulated data.

Spatial data layers of stream crossing point locations, cross-section polyline, centerline polyline, and bank polyline shapefiles have been developed for selected stream crossings in the Squannacook River basin, Massachusetts. The spatial data and calculated attribute values are model input data for U.S. Army Corps of Engineer’s Hydrologic Engineering Center’s River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) hydraulic models. The stream crossing point locations were derived from the North Atlantic Aquatic Connectivity Collaboration (NAACC) database. The stream channel cross-sections, centerlines, and bank polylines were derived using automated methods in a Geographic Information System (GIS) using ArcGIS Pro and Python programming language. The polyline shapefiles are Z-enabled and have elevation data derived from Light Detection and Ranging (lidar) Digital Elevation Models (DEM) for Z-coordinate vertex values in units of feet. The polyline shapefiles are also M-enabled and have profile stationing values for the M-coordinate vertex values in units of feet. The automated GIS processes delineated a series of stream channel cross-sections along lidar-derived stream centerlines and have stream channel bathymetry estimated from Massachusetts bankfull channel geometry equations (Bent and Waite, 2013). The bankfull equations were also used to derive stream bank polylines. This data release contains the following shapefiles in the Spatial_Data_Layers.zip file: 1. Stream_Crossing_Locations.shp - Esri point shapefile derived from the NAACC stream crossing database. 2. Stream_Crossing_Watersheds.shp - Esri polygon shapefile of lidar-derived watershed boundaries that estimate the upstream drainage area for each stream crossing location. 3. Model_Cross_Sections.shp - Esri Z- and M-enabled polyline shapefile of the cross-section data used for hydraulic model input. 4. Model_Flowpaths.shp - Esri Z- and M-enabled polyline shapefile of the stream centerline and stream bank line data used for hydraulic model input. References: Bent, G.C., and Waite, A.M., 2013, Equations for estimating bankfull channel geometry and discharge for streams in Massachusetts: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5155, 62 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20135155

Spatial regression models have recently received a lot of attention in a variety of fields to address the spatial autocorrelation effect. One important class of spatial models is the Conditional Autoregressive (CA). Theses models have been widely used to analyze spatial data in various areas, as geography, epidemiology, disease surveillance, civilian planning, mapping of poorness signals and others. In this article, we propose the Liu-type pretest, shrinkage and positive shrinkages estimators for the large-scale effect parameter vector of the CA regression model. The set of the proposed estimators are evaluated analytically via their asymptotic bias, quadratic bias, the asymptotic quadratic risks, and numerically via their relative mean squared errors. Our results demonstrate that the proposed estimators are more efficient than Liu-type estimator. To conclude this paper, we apply the proposed estimators to the Boston housing prices data, and applied a bootstrapping technique to evaluate the estimators based on their mean squared prediction error.