3 datasets found
  1. d

    CJCZO -- GIS/Map Data -- EEMT -- Santa Catalina Mountains -- (2010-2010)

    • search.dataone.org
    • hydroshare.org
    Updated Dec 5, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Craig Rasmussen; Matej Durcik (2021). CJCZO -- GIS/Map Data -- EEMT -- Santa Catalina Mountains -- (2010-2010) [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/sha256%3Af79c5b6ae39494aa0732981635ad3e39b5f731343ea03de995bc59a1c67ceb6b
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 5, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Hydroshare
    Authors
    Craig Rasmussen; Matej Durcik
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2010 - Dec 31, 2010
    Area covered
    Description

    Yearly effective energy and mass transfer (EEMT) (MJ m−2 yr−1) was calculated for the Catalina Mountains by summing the 12 monthly values. Effective energy and mass flux varies seasonally, especially in the desert southwestern United States where contemporary climate includes a bimodal precipitation distribution that concentrates in winter (rain or snow depending on elevation) and summer monsoon periods. This seasonality of EEMT flux into the upper soil surface can be estimated by calculating EEMT on a monthly basis as constrained by solar radiation (Rs), temperature (T), precipitation (PPT), and the vapor pressure deficit (VPD): EEMT = f(Rs,T,PPT,VPD). Here we used a multiple linear regression model to calculate the monthly EEMT that accounts for VPD, PPT, and locally modified T across the terrain surface. These EEMT calculations were made using data from the PRISM Climate Group at Oregon State University (www.prismclimate.org). Climate data are provided at an 800-m spatial resolution for input precipitation and minimum and maximum temperature normals and at a 4000-m spatial resolution for dew-point temperature (Daly et al., 2002). The PRISM climate data, however, do not account for localized variation in EEMT that results from smaller spatial scale changes in slope and aspect as occurs within catchments. To address this issue, these data were then combined with 10-m digital elevation maps to compute the effects of local slope and aspect on incoming solar radiation and hence locally modified temperature (Yang et al., 2007). Monthly average dew-point temperatures were computed using 10 yr of monthly data (2000–2009) and converted to vapor pressure. Precipitation, temperature, and dew-point data were resampled on a 10-m grid using spline interpolation. Monthly solar radiation data (direct and diffuse) were computed using ArcGIS Solar Analyst extension (ESRI, Redlands, CA) and 10-m elevation data (USGS National Elevation Dataset [NED] 1/3 Arc-Second downloaded from the National Map Seamless Server at seamless.usgs.gov). Locally modified temperature was used to compute the saturated vapor pressure, and the local VPD was estimated as the difference between the saturated and actual vapor pressures. The regression model was derived using the ISOHYS climate data set comprised of approximately 30-yr average monthly means for more than 300 weather stations spanning all latitudes and longitudes (IAEA).

  2. d

    CJCZO -- GIS/Map Data -- EEMT -- Jemez River Basin -- (2010-2010)

    • search.dataone.org
    • hydroshare.org
    • +1more
    Updated Dec 5, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Craig Rasmussen; Matej Durcik (2021). CJCZO -- GIS/Map Data -- EEMT -- Jemez River Basin -- (2010-2010) [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/sha256%3A5f9bd5e7817bde1f4eb38f02ef73098d9d7dcaf055b134a7ed47f111b38e8c92
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 5, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Hydroshare
    Authors
    Craig Rasmussen; Matej Durcik
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2010 - Dec 1, 2010
    Area covered
    Description

    Yearly effective energy and mass transfer (EEMT) (MJ m−2 yr−1) was calculated for the Valles Calders, upper part of the Jemez River basin by summing the 12 monthly values. Effective energy and mass flux varies seasonally, especially in the desert southwestern United States where contemporary climate includes a bimodal precipitation distribution that concentrates in winter (rain or snow depending on elevation) and summer monsoon periods. This seasonality of EEMT flux into the upper soil surface can be estimated by calculating EEMT on a monthly basis as constrained by solar radiation (Rs), temperature (T), precipitation (PPT), and the vapor pressure deficit (VPD): EEMT = f(Rs,T,PPT,VPD). Here we used a multiple linear regression model to calculate the monthly EEMT that accounts for VPD, PPT, and locally modified T across the terrain surface. These EEMT calculations were made using data from the PRISM Climate Group at Oregon State University (www.prismclimate.org). Climate data are provided at an 800-m spatial resolution for input precipitation and minimum and maximum temperature normals and at a 4000-m spatial resolution for dew-point temperature (Daly et al., 2002). The PRISM climate data, however, do not account for localized variation in EEMT that results from smaller spatial scale changes in slope and aspect as occurs within catchments. To address this issue, these data were then combined with 10-m digital elevation maps to compute the effects of local slope and aspect on incoming solar radiation and hence locally modified temperature (Yang et al., 2007). Monthly average dew-point temperatures were computed using 10 yr of monthly data (2000–2009) and converted to vapor pressure. Precipitation, temperature, and dew-point data were resampled on a 10-m grid using spline interpolation. Monthly solar radiation data (direct and diffuse) were computed using ArcGIS Solar Analyst extension (ESRI, Redlands, CA) and 10-m elevation data (USGS National Elevation Dataset [NED] 1/3 Arc-Second downloaded from the National Map Seamless Server at seamless.usgs.gov). Locally modified temperature was used to compute the saturated vapor pressure, and the local VPD was estimated as the difference between the saturated and actual vapor pressures. The regression model was derived using the ISOHYS climate data set comprised of approximately 30-yr average monthly means for more than 300 weather stations spanning all latitudes and longitudes (IAEA).

  3. c

    i12 Salinity Contours

    • gis.data.ca.gov
    • data.ca.gov
    • +3more
    Updated May 23, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Carlos.Lewis@water.ca.gov_DWR (2024). i12 Salinity Contours [Dataset]. https://gis.data.ca.gov/items/1adc53539951477ba09b8b5c492b15d8
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 23, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Carlos.Lewis@water.ca.gov_DWR
    Area covered
    Description

    Data represents maximum up-estuary intrusion of the 1 ppt salinity contour. The lines represent 1000 ppt chloride per million, measured 1½ hours after high tide. This data contains contours for 1921-1990.

  4. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Craig Rasmussen; Matej Durcik (2021). CJCZO -- GIS/Map Data -- EEMT -- Santa Catalina Mountains -- (2010-2010) [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/sha256%3Af79c5b6ae39494aa0732981635ad3e39b5f731343ea03de995bc59a1c67ceb6b

CJCZO -- GIS/Map Data -- EEMT -- Santa Catalina Mountains -- (2010-2010)

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Dec 5, 2021
Dataset provided by
Hydroshare
Authors
Craig Rasmussen; Matej Durcik
Time period covered
Jan 1, 2010 - Dec 31, 2010
Area covered
Description

Yearly effective energy and mass transfer (EEMT) (MJ m−2 yr−1) was calculated for the Catalina Mountains by summing the 12 monthly values. Effective energy and mass flux varies seasonally, especially in the desert southwestern United States where contemporary climate includes a bimodal precipitation distribution that concentrates in winter (rain or snow depending on elevation) and summer monsoon periods. This seasonality of EEMT flux into the upper soil surface can be estimated by calculating EEMT on a monthly basis as constrained by solar radiation (Rs), temperature (T), precipitation (PPT), and the vapor pressure deficit (VPD): EEMT = f(Rs,T,PPT,VPD). Here we used a multiple linear regression model to calculate the monthly EEMT that accounts for VPD, PPT, and locally modified T across the terrain surface. These EEMT calculations were made using data from the PRISM Climate Group at Oregon State University (www.prismclimate.org). Climate data are provided at an 800-m spatial resolution for input precipitation and minimum and maximum temperature normals and at a 4000-m spatial resolution for dew-point temperature (Daly et al., 2002). The PRISM climate data, however, do not account for localized variation in EEMT that results from smaller spatial scale changes in slope and aspect as occurs within catchments. To address this issue, these data were then combined with 10-m digital elevation maps to compute the effects of local slope and aspect on incoming solar radiation and hence locally modified temperature (Yang et al., 2007). Monthly average dew-point temperatures were computed using 10 yr of monthly data (2000–2009) and converted to vapor pressure. Precipitation, temperature, and dew-point data were resampled on a 10-m grid using spline interpolation. Monthly solar radiation data (direct and diffuse) were computed using ArcGIS Solar Analyst extension (ESRI, Redlands, CA) and 10-m elevation data (USGS National Elevation Dataset [NED] 1/3 Arc-Second downloaded from the National Map Seamless Server at seamless.usgs.gov). Locally modified temperature was used to compute the saturated vapor pressure, and the local VPD was estimated as the difference between the saturated and actual vapor pressures. The regression model was derived using the ISOHYS climate data set comprised of approximately 30-yr average monthly means for more than 300 weather stations spanning all latitudes and longitudes (IAEA).

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu