Quantitative results for different metrics under varying levels of occlusion in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset.

Quantitative results for different metrics under varying levels of distance between instances are presented in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset.

Quantitative results for instance segmentation considering different ratio values, in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset.

F-score results for Fg-Bg segmentation, considering different values of M, with and without post-processing.

Quantitative results for different metrics under varying levels of FG/BG smoothness in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset.

An ablation study to analyze the impact of proposed components on mIoU.

A comparison of instance segmentation results between different metrics for creating the affinity matrix, with the proposed metric, regarding mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 and OVIS datasets.

In our everyday lives, we are required to make decisions based upon our statistical intuitions. Often, these involve the comparison of two groups, such as luxury versus family cars and their suitability. Research has shown that the mean difference affects judgements where two sets of data are compared, but the variability of the data has only a minor influence, if any at all. However, prior research has tended to present raw data as simple lists of values. Here, we investigated whether displaying data visually, in the form of parallel dot plots, would lead viewers to incorporate variability information. In Experiment 1, we asked a large sample of people to compare two fictional groups (children who drank ‘Brain Juice’ versus water) in a one-shot design, where only a single comparison was made. Our results confirmed that only the mean difference between the groups predicted subsequent judgements of how much they differed, in line with previous work using lists of numbers. In Experiment 2, we asked each participant to make multiple comparisons, with both the mean difference and the pooled standard deviation varying across data sets they were shown. Here, we found that both sources of information were correctly incorporated when making responses. Taken together, we suggest that increasing the salience of variability information, through manipulating this factor across items seen, encourages viewers to consider this in their judgements. Such findings may have useful applications for best practices when teaching difficult concepts like sampling variation.

Mean values, standard deviations and p-values at four different time points (baseline concentrations, immediately post apnea, 0.5 h and 4 h after apnea) of white blood cell parameters.

Mean values, standard deviations and p-values at four different time points (baseline concentrations, immediately post apnea, 0.5 h and 4 h after apnea) for thrombocytes and mean platelet volume.