3 datasets found
  1. f

    Quantitative results for instance segmentation considering different ratio...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Oct 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei (2024). Quantitative results for instance segmentation considering different ratio values, in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307432.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    YouTube
    Description

    Quantitative results for instance segmentation considering different ratio values, in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset.

  2. f

    DSMZ-MBNMS Vent and Non-Vent community composition from images and...

    • figshare.com
    txt
    Updated Mar 28, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Anne Hartwell (2023). DSMZ-MBNMS Vent and Non-Vent community composition from images and environmental data set [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22350565.v2
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 28, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Authors
    Anne Hartwell
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary
    Description

    Abstract DSMZ-MBNMS Outcrop Vent and Non Vent community composition from still images collected with ROV Hercules on NA117 contains the observations of community to the family level in 8 vent and non-vent zones around the Octopus Garden and Octocone. Also included are location, subtrate, zone type, TASSE variable values: Easterness, Mean Depth, Northerness, Topographic position index (RDMV), Slope, Standard Deviation, and Surface Depth, BRESS geomorphon, and averate temperature. Methods Observational data was collected by manual identification of 1-minute interval still images in the DSMZ-MBNSM NA117 videos available at: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL41b0O3MiKnZjVYKiC8zunwc7tGS9L2Az . Observations were identified with the aid of deep sea guides*: HURL, NOAA, and MBARI. BRESS and TASSE variables were extraction for bathymetric grids availble via Marine Geoscience Data System under Compilations as OctopusGarden_MBARI. Substrate was identifed manually. Temperature data was collected in NA-117 with ROV Hercules. Vent and Non-Vent zones were defined by temperature. Environmental and Community data for each image sample were complined in QGIS. Data is identifed as Q for qualitative and C for catagorical. Substrate Catagories: 0: Sheet, 1 Bare Rock, 2 Carbonate, 3 Blocky sheet pillow lobate, 4 Lobate, 5 Pillow, 6 Sediment, 7 Lobate Pillow Mix, 8 Lobate Broken Pillow Mix, 9 Lobate Pillow Contact, 10 Sediment Lobate Contact, 11 Lobate Sheet Mix, 12 Lobate Sediment Mix, 13 Lobate Sheet Contact, 14 Sediment Pillow Mix. BRESS Categories: 1 Flat, 2 Footslope, 3 Ridge, 4 Shoulder, 5 Slope, 6 Valley. Vent/Non Vent Catagories: 1 Non-Vent, 2 Vent. University of Hawai‘i Undersea Research Laboratory (HURL) Deep-sea Animal Identification Guide. Available from http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/ HURL/HURLarchive/guide.php US Department of Commerce, N. (2018, August 23). Data: Animal Identification Guide: NOAA Office of Ocean Exploration and Research. Retrieved October 26, 2020, from https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/okeanos/animal_guide/animal_guide.html Jacobsen Stout, N., L. Kuhnz, L. Lundsten, B. Schlining, K. Schlining, and S. von Thun (eds.). The Deep-Sea Guide (DSG). Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI). Consulted on: 2022-07-01.

  3. f

    Mean and standard deviation of classifier accuracy across repeated training...

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ben Williams; Santiago M. Balvanera; Sarab S. Sethi; Timothy A.C. Lamont; Jamaluddin Jompa; Mochyudho Prasetya; Laura Richardson; Lucille Chapuis; Emma Weschke; Andrew Hoey; Ricardo Beldade; Suzanne C. Mills; Anne Haguenauer; Frederic Zuberer; Stephen D. Simpson; David Curnick; Kate E. Jones (2025). Mean and standard deviation of classifier accuracy across repeated training instances using each the three machine learning methods (compound index, pretrained CNN and trained CNN) at six different tasks. Accuracy is the proportion of one-minute recordings from the test data that were correctly classified. Methods where accuracy was reported as significantly higher by the ANOVA test are indicated in superscript next to the mean value for the respective method (A = highest group, B = second highest group, no letter = lowest group). The Random baseline accuracy indicates the expected accuracy of a model that performs random classification. N = 100 for all tasks, except the Fish diversity (Australia) and Depth (French Polynesia) tasks, where N = 32. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013029.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 9, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS Computational Biology
    Authors
    Ben Williams; Santiago M. Balvanera; Sarab S. Sethi; Timothy A.C. Lamont; Jamaluddin Jompa; Mochyudho Prasetya; Laura Richardson; Lucille Chapuis; Emma Weschke; Andrew Hoey; Ricardo Beldade; Suzanne C. Mills; Anne Haguenauer; Frederic Zuberer; Stephen D. Simpson; David Curnick; Kate E. Jones
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Mean and standard deviation of classifier accuracy across repeated training instances using each the three machine learning methods (compound index, pretrained CNN and trained CNN) at six different tasks. Accuracy is the proportion of one-minute recordings from the test data that were correctly classified. Methods where accuracy was reported as significantly higher by the ANOVA test are indicated in superscript next to the mean value for the respective method (A = highest group, B = second highest group, no letter = lowest group). The Random baseline accuracy indicates the expected accuracy of a model that performs random classification. N = 100 for all tasks, except the Fish diversity (Australia) and Depth (French Polynesia) tasks, where N = 32.

  4. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei (2024). Quantitative results for instance segmentation considering different ratio values, in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307432.t004

Quantitative results for instance segmentation considering different ratio values, in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset.

Related Article
Explore at:
xlsAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Oct 7, 2024
Dataset provided by
PLOS ONE
Authors
Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Area covered
YouTube
Description

Quantitative results for instance segmentation considering different ratio values, in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu