Tokyo Prefecture continued to be a magnet for domestic migration in Japan, attracting nearly 58,500 new residents from other prefectures in 2023. By contrast, Hiroshima Prefecture showed the highest population loss due to outbound migration within the country, with a net loss of approximately 7,400 migrants. Attractiveness of Tokyo The population density in the prefecture has grown over the past two decades, surpassing 6,400 inhabitants per square kilometer in 2020. The appealing nature of Tokyo is also reflected in the age demographics of the metropolis, with most residents falling within the working-age group of 15 to 64 years. Numerous prestigious universities and large corporations make the area a popular destination for young people with aspirations. Depopulation of rural areas The migration patterns across Japan's prefectures indicate significant regional disparities. While Tokyo leads in population size with 14 million inhabitants in 2023, prefectures like Tottori struggle to retain residents, counting only about 540,000 people. This imbalance has prompted concerns about the sustainability of rural communities and has led to various initiatives aimed at revitalizing less populous areas. The Japanese government faces the complex task of addressing these demographic shifts while also navigating challenges resulting from a nationwide aging population due to prolonged life expectancy and fertility decline.

Dataset, GDB, and Online Map created by Renee Haley, NMCDC, May 2023 DATA ACQUISITION PROCESS

Scope and purpose of project: New Mexico is struggling to maintain its healthcare workforce, particularly in Rural areas. This project was undertaken with the intent of looking at flows of healthcare workers into and out of New Mexico at the most granular geographic level possible. This dataset, in combination with others (such as housing cost and availability data) may help us understand where our healthcare workforce is relocating and why.

The most relevant and detailed data on workforce indicators in the United States is housed by the Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics, LEHD, System. Information on this system is available here:

https://lehd.ces.census.gov/

The Job-to-Job flows explorer within this system was used to download the data. Information on the J2J explorer can ve found here:

https://j2jexplorer.ces.census.gov/explore.html#1432012

The dataset was built from data queried with the LED Extraction Tool, which allows for the query of more intersectional and detailed data than the explorer. This is a link to the LED extraction tool:

https://ledextract.ces.census.gov/

The geographies used are US Metro areas as determined by the Census, (N=389). The shapefile is named lehd_shp_gb.zip, and can be downloaded under this section of the following webpage: 5.5. Job-to-Job Flow Geographies, 5.5.1. Metropolitan (Complete). A link to the download site is available below:

https://lehd.ces.census.gov/data/schema/j2j_latest/lehd_shapefiles.html

DATA CLEANING PROCESS

This dataset was built from 8 non intersectional datasets downloaded from the LED Extraction Tool.

Separate datasets were downloaded in order to obtain detailed information on the race, ethnicity, and educational attainment levels of healthcare workers and where they are migrating.

Datasets included information for the four separate quarters of 2021. It was not possible to download annual data, only quarterly. Quarterly data was summed in a later step to derive annual totals for 2021.

4 datasets for healthcare workers moving OUT OF New Mexico, with details on race, ethnicity, and educational attainment, were downloaded. 1 contained information on educational attainment, 2 contained information on 7 racial categories identifying as non- Hispanic, 3 contained information on those same 7 categories also identifying as Hispanic, and 4 contained information for workers identifying as white and Hispanic.

4 datasets for healthcare worker moving INTO New Mexico, with details on race, ethnicity, and educational attainment, were downloaded with the same details outlined above.

Each dataset was cleaned according to Data Template which kept key attributes and discarded excess information. Within each dataset, the J2J Indicators reflecting 6 different types of job migration were totaled in order to simplify analysis, as this information was not needed in detail.

After cleaning, each set of 4 datasets for workers moving INTO New Mexico were joined. The process was repeated for workers moving OUT OF New Mexico. This resulted 2 main datasets.

These 2 main datasets still listed all of the variables by each quarter of 2021. Because of this the data was split in JMP, so that attributes of educational attainment, race and ethnicity, of workers migrating by quarter were moved from rows to columns. After this, summary columns for the year of 2021 were derived. This resulted in totals columns for workers identifying as: 6 separate races and all ethnicities, all races and Hispanic, white-Hispanic, and workers of 6 different education levels, reflecting how many workers of each indicator migrated to and from metro areas in New Mexico in 2021.

The data split transposed duplicate rows reflecting differing worker attributes within the same metro area, resulting in one row for each metro area and reflecting the attributes in columns, thus resulting in a mappable dataset.

The 2 datasets were joined (on Metro Area) resulting in one master file containing information on healthcare workers entering and leaving New Mexico.

Rows (N=389) reflect all of the metro areas across the US, and each state. Rows include the 5 metro areas within New Mexico, and New Mexico State.

Columns (N=99) contain information on worker race, ethnicity and educational attainment, specific to each metro area in New Mexico.

78 of these rows reflect workers of specific attributes moving OUT OF the 5 specific Metro Areas in New Mexico and totals for NM State. This level of detail is intended for analyzing who is leaving what area of New Mexico, where they are going to, and why.

13 Columns reflect each worker attribute for healthcare workers moving INTO New Mexico by race, ethnicity and education level. Because all 5 metro areas and New Mexico state are contained in the rows, this information for incoming workers is available by metro area and at the state level - there is less possability for mapping these attributes since it was not realistic or possible to create a dataset reflecting all of these variables for every healthcare worker from every metro area in the US also coming into New Mexico (that dataset would have over 1,000 columns and be unmappable). Therefore this dataset is easier to utilize in looking at why workers are leaving the state but also includes detailed information on who is coming in.

The remaining 8 columns contain geographic information.

GIS AND MAPPING PROCESS

The master file was opened in Arc GIS Pro and the Shapefile of US Metro Areas was also imported

The excel file was joined to the shapefile by Metro Area Name as they matched exactly

The resulting layer was exported as a GDB in order to retain null values which would turn to zeros if exported as a shapefile.

This GDB was uploaded to Arc GIS Online, Aliases were inserted as column header names, and the layer was visualized as desired.

SYSTEMS USED

MS Excel was used for data cleaning, summing NM state totals, and summing quarterly to annual data.

JMP was used to transpose, join, and split data.

ARC GIS Desktop was used to create the shapefile uploaded to NMCDC's online platform.

VARIABLE AND RECODING NOTES

Summary of variables selected for datasets downloaded focused on educational attainment:

J2J Flows by Educational Attainment

Summary of variables selected for datasets downloaded focused on race and ethnicity:

J2J Flows by Race and Ethnicity

Note: Variables in Datasets 1 through 4 downloaded twice, once for workers coming into New Mexico and once for those leaving NM. VARIABLE: LEHD VARIABLE DEFINITION LEHD VARIABLE NOTES DETAILS OR URL FOR RAW DATA DOWNLOAD

Geography Type - State Origin and Destination State

Data downloaded for worker migration into and out of all US States

Geography Type - Metropolitan Areas Origin and Dest Metro Area

Data downloaded for worker migration into and out of all US Metro Areas

NAICS sectors North American Industry Classification System Under Firm Characteristics Only downloaded for Healthcare and Social Assistance Sectors

Other Firm Characteristics No Firm Age / Size Detail Under Firm Characteristics Downloaded data on all firm ages, sizes, and other details.

Worker Characteristics Education, Race, Ethnicity

Non Intersectional data aside from Race / Ethnicity data.

Sex Gender

0 - All Sexes Selected

Age Age

A00 All Ages (14-99)

Education Education Level E0, E1, E2, E3, 34, E5 E0 - All Education Categories, E1 - Less than high school, E2 - High school or equivalent, no college, E3 - Some college or Associate’s degree, E4 - Bachelor's degree or advanced degree, E5 - Educational attainment not available (workers aged 24 or younger)

Dataset 1 All Education Levels, E1, E2, E3, E4, and E5

RACE

A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5 OPTIONS: A0 All Races, A1 White Alone, A2 Black or African American Alone, A3 American Indian or Alaska Native Alone, A4 Asian Alone, A5 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Alone, SDA7 Two or More Race Groups

ETHNICITY

A0, A1, A2 OPTIONS: A0 All Ethnicities, A1 Not Hispanic or Latino, A2 Hispanic or Latino

Dataset 2 All Races (A0) and All Ethnicities (A0)

Dataset 3 6 Races (A1 through A5) and All Ethnicities (A0)

Dataset 4 White (A1) and Hispanic or Latino (A1)

Quarter Quarter and Year

Data from all quarters of 2021 to sum into annual numbers; yearly data was not available

Employer type Sector: Private or Governmental

Query included all healthcare sector workflows from all employer types and firm sizes from every quarter of 2021

J2J indicator categories Detailed types of job migration

All options were selected for all datasets and totaled: AQHire, AQHireS, EE, EES, J2J, J2JS. Counts were selected vs. earnings, and data was not seasonally adjusted (unavailable).

NOTES AND RESOURCES

The following resources and documentation were used to navigate the LEHD and J2J Worker Flows system and to answer questions about variables:

https://lehd.ces.census.gov/data/schema/j2j_latest/lehd_public_use_schema.html

https://www.census.gov/history/www/programs/geography/metropolitan_areas.html

https://lehd.ces.census.gov/data/schema/j2j_latest/lehd_csv_naming.html

Statewide (New

The project lead for the collection of this data was Tom Stephenson. Mule deer (130 adult females) from the Casa Diablo herd were captured and equipped with store-onboard GPS collars (Lotek Pinnacle Pro and Vectronic Survey), transmitting data from 2014-2023. Casa Diablo mule deer are largely traditional migrants, with a winter range stretching between the Benton Range and eastern Inyo National Forest. For summer, individuals move west using a wide range of pathways; however, a concentrated movement corridor passes through Long Valley, across U.S. Highway 395, and into the high mountain Sierra Nevada range. Most deer do not cross into Yosemite National Park. Summer range exists on both sides of U.S. Highway 395, which is a known hotspot for deer-vehicle collisions. Migrants vary in their movements from shorter (4 km) to longer (80 km) distances.GPS locations were fixed between 1-24 hour intervals in the dataset. To improve the quality of the data set as per Bjørneraas et al. (2010), the GPS data were filtered prior to analysis to remove locations which were: i) further from either the previous point or subsequent point than an individual deer is able to travel in the elapsed time, ii) forming spikes in the movement trajectory based on outgoing and incoming speeds and turning angles sharper than a predefined threshold , or iii) fixed in 2D space and visually assessed as a bad fix by the analyst. The methodology used for this migration analysis allowed for the mapping of winter ranges and the identification and prioritization of migration corridors. Brownian Bridge Movement Models (BBMMs; Sawyer et al. 2009) were constructed with GPS collar data from 101 migrating deer, including 445 migration sequences, location, date, time, and average location error as inputs in Migration Mapper. The dataset was divided into two overlapping subgroups based on winter range location (i.e., north, central) and analyzed separately, but visualized together as a final product. The averag

The Southern Owyhee Desert elk herd follows an east-to-west migration pattern (fig. 40), which is unique for Nevada, where migration routes for many ungulate herds follow mountain ranges from the north to the south. A few low use corridors cross Nevada State Route 789, but several medium and high use corridors intersect Nevada State Route 226 and Interstate 11. During the summer, the herd inhabits the northern parts of the Tuscarora and Independence Mountains, which rise from the southeastern part of Owyhee Desert and demarcate the boundary between the Columbia Plateau and the Great Basin desert in northern Nevada. This summer range partially overlaps with the neighboring Y P Desert elk herd, which also has an east-to-west migratory strategy (refer to the “Y P Desert Elk” section in this report). Elevations range from 5,500 ft (1,676 m), where slopes originate at the desert floor, to 8,602 ft (2,622 m) at McCann Creek Mountain in the northern Tuscarora Mountains, and to 10,208 ft (3,111 m) at Jacks Peak in the Independence Mountains. Summer habitats include vegetative communities typical of the Great Basin desert where, historically, mixed shrubland, composed of sagebrush and rabbitbrush, dominates lower elevations and rises into higher elevations, overlapping with mountain brush species such as antelope bitterbrush, western serviceberry, snowbush, communities of quaking aspen, curl-leaf mountain-mahogany, and fir. Although much of the high-elevation vegetative communities remain intact, a long history of wildfires has converted nearly the entire low and midelevation winter ranges in the southern Owyhee Desert from shrublands to herbaceous vegetation communities. Ongoing restoration efforts actively seek to reverse the spread of invasive cheatgrass, stabilize soils, and provide forage to wildlife by seeding sagebrush and native bunch grasses, such as basin wildrye, Idaho fescue, and nonnative, but beneficial, varieties of wheatgrass and Bassia prostrata (prostrate kochia). Small pockets of intact native shrublands and grasslands still exist on the winter range. The most commonly used winter range is in the southern boundary of the Owyhee Desert, but some individuals migrate longer distances to winter in the Little Humboldt River Study Area, which is more varied topographically but has a similar winter range vegetation community. Overall, conversion of habitat from woody to herbaceous plants has benefitted elk in this herd and elsewhere in Nevada (for example, refer to the “Y P Desert Elk” section in this report). Growth for this herd is limited by an annual pulse in spring mortality, which is approximately 20–40 percent of elk each year (C. McKee, Nevada Department of Wildlife, written commun., 2023). Antlerless elk hunts were stopped in 2022, and since then population growth is stable to slightly increasing (T. Allen, Nevada Department of Wildlife, written commun., 2023). These mapping layers show the _location of the migration routes for Elk (Cervus canadensis) in the Southern Owyhee Desert population in Nevada. They were developed from 58 migration sequences collected from a sample size of 45 animals comprising GPS locations collected every 1−13 hours.

These population projections were prepared by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) for Geoscience Australia. The projections are not official ABS data and are owned by Geoscience Australia. These projections are for Statistical Areas Level 2 (SA2s) and Local Government Areas (LGAs), and are projected out from a base population as at 30 June 2022, by age and sex. Projections are for 30 June 2023 to 2032, with results disaggregated by age and sex.

Method The cohort-component method was used for these projections. In this method, the base population is projected forward annually by calculating the effect of births, deaths and migration (the components) within each age-sex cohort according to the specified fertility, mortality and overseas and internal migration assumptions. The projected usual resident population by single year of age and sex was produced in four successive stages – national, state/territory, capital city/rest of state, and finally SA2s. Assumptions were made for each level and the resulting projected components and population are constrained to the geographic level above for each year.
These projections were derived from a combination of assumptions published in Population Projections, Australia, 2022 (base) to 2071 on 23 November 2023, and historical patterns observed within each state/territory.

Projections – capital city/rest of state regions The base population is 30 June 2022 Estimated Resident Population (ERP) as published in National, state and territory population, June 2022. For fertility, the total fertility rate (at the national level) is based on the medium assumption used in Population Projections, Australia, 2022 (base) to 2071, of 1.6 babies per woman being phased in from 2022 levels over five years to 2027, before remaining steady for the remainder of the projection span. Observed state/territory, and greater capital city level fertility differentials were applied to the national data so that established trends in the state and capital city/rest of state relativities were preserved. Mortality rates are based on the medium assumption used in Population Projections, Australia, 2022 (base) to 2071, and assume that mortality rates will continue to decline across Australia with state/territory differentials persisting. State/territory and capital city/rest of state differentials were used to ensure projected deaths are consistent with the historical trend. Annual net overseas migration (NOM) is based on the medium assumption used in Population Projections, Australia, 2022 (base) to 2071, with an assumed gain (at the national level) of 400,000 in 2022-23, increasing to 315,000 in 2023-24, then declining to 225,000 in 2026-27, after which NOM is assumed to remain constant. State and capital city/rest of state shares are based on a weighted average of NOM data from 2010 to 2019 at the state and territory level to account for the impact of COVID-19. For internal migration, net gains and losses from states and territories and capital city/rest of state regions are based on the medium assumption used in Population Projections, Australia, 2022 (base) to 2071, and assume that net interstate migration will trend towards long-term historic average flows.

Projections – Statistical Areas Level 2 The base population for each SA2 is the estimated resident population in each area by single year of age and sex, at 30 June 2022, as published in Regional population by age and sex, 2022 on 28 September 2023. The SA2-level fertility and mortality assumptions were derived by combining the medium scenario state/territory assumptions from Population Projections, Australia, 2022 (base) to 2071, with recent fertility and mortality trends in each SA2 based on annual births (by sex) and deaths (by age and sex) published in Regional Population, 2021-22 and Regional Population by Age and Sex, 2022. Assumed overseas and internal migration for each SA2 is based on SA2-specific annual overseas and internal arrivals and departures estimates published in Regional Population, 2021-22 and Regional Population by Age and Sex, 2022. The internal migration data was strengthened with SA2-specific data from the 2021 Census, based on the usual residence one year before Census night question. Assumptions were applied by SA2, age and sex. Assumptions were adjusted for some SA2s, to provide more plausible future population levels, and age and sex distribution changes, including areas where populations may not age over time, for example due to significant resident student and defence force populations. Most assumption adjustments were made via the internal migration component. For some SA2s with zero or a very small population base, but where significant population growth is expected, replacement migration age/sex profiles were applied. All SA2-level components and projected projections are constrained to the medium series of capital city/rest of state data in Population Projections, Australia, 2022 (base) to 2071.

Projections – Local Government Areas The base population for each LGA is the estimated resident population in each area by single year of age and sex, at 30 June 2022, as published in Regional population by age and sex, 2022 on 28 September 2023. Projections for 30 June 2023 to 2032 were created by converting from the SA2-level population projections to LGAs by age and sex. This was done using an age-specific population correspondence, where the data for each year of the projection span were converted based on 2021 population shares across SA2s. The LGA and SA2 projections are congruous in aggregation as well as in isolation. Unlike the projections prepared at SA2 level, no LGA-specific projection assumptions were used.

Nature of projections and considerations for usage The nature of the projection method and inherent fluctuations in population dynamics mean that care should be taken when using and interpreting the projection results. The projections are not forecasts, but rather illustrate future changes which would occur if the stated assumptions were to apply over the projection period. These projections do not attempt to allow for non-demographic factors such as major government policy decisions, economic factors, catastrophes, wars and pandemics, which may affect future demographic behaviour. To illustrate a range of possible outcomes, alternative projection series for national, state/territory and capital city/rest of state areas, using different combinations of fertility, mortality, overseas and internal migration assumptions, are prepared. Alternative series are published in Population Projections, Australia, 2022 (base) to 2071. Only one series of SA2-level projections was prepared for this product. Population projections can take account of planning and other decisions by governments known at the time the projections were derived, including sub-state projections published by each state and territory government. The ABS generally does not have access to the policies or decisions of commonwealth, state and local governments and businesses that assist in accurately forecasting small area populations. Migration, especially internal migration, accounts for the majority of projected population change for most SA2s. Volatile and unpredictable small area migration trends, especially in the short-term, can have a significant effect on longer-term projection results. Care therefore should be taken with SA2s with small total populations and very small age-sex cells, especially at older ages. While these projections are calculated at the single year of age level, small numbers, and fluctuations across individual ages in the base population and projection assumptions limit the reliability of SA2-level projections at single year of age level. These fluctuations reduce and reliability improves when the projection results are aggregated to broader age groups such as the five-year age bands in this product. For areas with small elderly populations, results aggregated to 65 and over are more reliable than for the individual age groups above 65. With the exception of areas with high planned population growth, SA2s with a base total population of less than 500 have generally been held constant for the projection period in this product as their populations are too small to be reliably projected at all, however their (small) age/sex distributions may change slightly. These SA2s are listed in the appendix. The base (2022) SA2 population estimates and post-2022 projections by age and sex include small artificial cells, including 1s and 2s. These are the result of a confidentialisation process and forced additivity, to control SA2 and capital city/rest of state age/sex totals, being applied to their original values. SA2s and LGAs in this product are based on the Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS) boundaries as at the 2021 Census (ASGS Edition 3). For further information, see Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS) Edition 3.

Made possible by the Digital Atlas of Australia The Digital Atlas of Australia is a key Australian Government initiative being led by Geoscience Australia, highlighted in the Data and Digital Government Strategy. It brings together trusted datasets from across government in an interactive, secure, and easy-to-use geospatial platform. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) is working in partnership with Geoscience Australia to establish a set of web services to make ABS data available in the Digital Atlas of Australia.

Contact the Australian Bureau of Statistics If you have questions or feedback about this web service, please email geography@abs.gov.au. To subscribe to updates about ABS web services and geospatial products, please complete this form. For information about how the ABS manages any personal information you provide view the ABS privacy policy.

Data and geography references Source data publication: Population Projections, Australia, 2022 (base)

In 2023 there were 5,608 illegal border crossings into the European Union via it's Eastern borders, compared with 8,160 in 2021. This route typically sees far fewer illegal crossings than the Mediterranean Sea does, however, these have increased sharply in recent years, as the Lukashenko regime in Belarus - a state hostile to the European Union - has allowed increased migration to the EU via its borders with Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland. These migrants are generally not Belarussians, but migrants transitting through Belarus to the EU, mostly from the Middle East or North Africa. The Lukashenko regime aims to put pressure on the EU to remove sanctions on Belarus, which have been in place since the country's fraudulent election in 2020 and the subsequent suppression of the mass protest movement which developed to oppose the regime.

Chart and table of the Uae net migration rate from 1950 to 2025. United Nations projections are also included through the year 2100.

The estimated population of unauthorized immigrants in the U.S. stands at around 11 million people. Although the number has stabilized, the United States has seen a spike in migrant encounters in the last few years, with over two million cases registered by the U.S. Border Patrol in 2023. This is a slight decrease from the previous year, when there were over 2.2 million cases registered. Due to its proximity and shared border, Mexico remains the leading country of origin for most undocumented immigrants in the U.S., with California and Texas being home to the majority.

Immigration and political division

Despite the majority of the population having immigrant roots, the topic of immigration in the U.S. remains one of the country’s longest-standing political debates. Support among Republicans for restrictive immigration has grown alongside Democratic support for open immigration. This growing divide has deepened the polarization between the two major political parties, stifling constructive dialogue and impeding meaningful reform efforts and as a result, has led to dissatisfaction from all sides. In addition to general immigration policy, feelings toward illegal immigration in the U.S. also vary widely. For some, it's seen as a significant threat to national security, cultural identity, and economic stability. This perspective often aligns with support for stringent measures like Trump's proposed border wall and increased enforcement efforts. On the other hand, there are those who are more sympathetic toward undocumented immigrants, as demonstrated by support for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Chart and table of the Philippines net migration rate from 1950 to 2025. United Nations projections are also included through the year 2100.

Chart and table of the Malaysia net migration rate from 1950 to 2025. United Nations projections are also included through the year 2100.

The largest number of immigrants in Germany were from Ukraine, as of 2023. The top three origin countries were rounded up by Romania and Turkey. Immigrants are defined as having left a country, which may be their home country, to permanently reside in another. Upon arriving, immigrants do not hold the citizenship of the country they move to. Immigration in the EU All three aforementioned countries are members of the European Union, which means their citizens have freedom of movement between EU member states. In practice, this means that citizens of any EU member country may relocate between them to live and work there. Unrestricted by visas or residence permits, the search for university courses, jobs, retirement options, and places to live seems to be defined by an enormous amount of choice. However, even in this freedom of movement scheme, immigration may be hampered by bureaucratic hurdles or financial challenges. Prosperity with a question mark While Germany continues to be an attractive destination for foreigners both in and outside the European Union, as well as asylum applicants, it remains to be seen how current events might influence these patterns, whether the number of immigrants arriving from certain countries will shift. Europe’s largest economy is suffering. Climbing inflation levels in the last few months, as well as remaining difficulties from the ongoing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic are affecting global economic development. Ultimately, future immigrants may face the fact of moving from one struggling economy to another.

For the year ending June 2024, approximately 1.2 million people migrated to the United Kingdom, while 479,000 people migrated from the UK, resulting in a net migration figure of 728,000. There have consistently been more people migrating to the United Kingdom than leaving it since 1993 when the net migration figure was negative 1,000. Although migration from the European Union has declined since the Brexit vote of 2016, migration from non-EU countries accelerated rapidly from 2021 onwards. In the year to June 2023, 968,000 people from non-EU countries migrated to the UK, compared with 129,000 from EU member states. Immigration and the next UK election Throughout 2023, immigration, along with the economy and healthcare, was consistently seen by UK voters as one of the top issues facing the country. Despite a pledge to deter irregular migration via small boats, and controversial plans to send asylum applicants to Rwanda while their claims are being processed, the current government is losing the trust of the public on this issue. As of February 2024, 20 percent of Britons thought the Labour Party would be the best party to handle immigration, compared with 16 percent who thought the Conservatives would handle it better. With the next UK election expected at some point in 2024, the Conservatives are battling to improve their public image on this and many other issues. Historical context of migration The first humans who arrived in the British Isles, were followed by acts of conquest and settlement from Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Danes, and Normans. In the early modern period, there were also significant waves of migration from people fleeing religious or political persecution, such as the French Huguenots. More recently, large numbers of people also left Britain. Between 1820 and 1957, for example, around 4.5 million people migrated from Britain to America. After World War Two, immigration from Britain's colonies and former colonies was encouraged to meet labor demands. A key group that migrated from the Caribbean between the late 1940s and early 1970s became known as the Windrush generation, named after one of the ships that brought the arrivals to Britain.

In 2023, around 1.93 million people immigrated to Germany. Numbers fluctuated during the time period covered in the graph at hand, peaking in 2015 during the high point of Europe’s refugee crisis. Significantly lower figures in 2020 may be attributed to the first year of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and subsequent restrictions implemented by the German government on entering the country, in order to control the spread of the disease. Immigration to Germany “Immigrant” is a term used from the point of view of the receiving country, or the country being migrated to by a person. While reasons for and circumstances leading to an immigrant entering a foreign country may vary, they often include love, include seeking residence, employment, family reunions, or applying for asylum. Various countries are represented among foreigners living in Germany, though currently the leading three by numbers are Turkey, Ukraine, and Syria. Around 5.2 million immigrants living in Germany do not need a residence permit due to having EU citizenship, and therefore being allowed freedom of movement based on EU law. Another 2.64 million immigrants were granted an unlimited permit to stay in Germany. The near future Germany remains a popular choice for immigrants, even in currently challenging economic and political times. Welfare benefits, healthcare, and various support initiatives for those moving to or arriving in the country are on the list of selling points, though in practice, difficulties may be encountered depending on individual situations and laws in different German federal states. While the unemployment rate among foreigners living in Germany had gone up in 2020, it dropped again in the following years, but increased once more in 2023 and 2024 to over 16 percent. The country is Europe’s largest economy, housing many global players in various industries, which continues to attract jobseekers, despite these very industries facing struggles of their own brought on both by the ongoing coronavirus pandemic and geopolitical events in Europe.

In 2024, the European country registering the largest number of migrants' arrivals was Italy. As of October 2024, 53,000 immigrants reached the Italian peninsula by sea. Spain had the second-largest number of arrivals by sea, 42,000 immigrants, both from the Wester Mediterranean route and the Wester African Atlantic route. Bulgaria was the country registering the largest number of arrivals by land 6,340.

As recorded by the source, Moroccans ranked as the foreign nationality with more residents in Spain in 2023, closely followed by Romanians. After years of losing its foreign population, Spain’s immigration figures started to pick up in 2015, with the number of people that moved to the Mediterranean country surpassing the number of foreigners that decided to leave.

A matter of balance The net migration rate of Spain changed its course mainly due to the great inflow of foreigners that move to reside in the Mediterranean country. Spain’s immigration flow slowed down after the 2008 financial crisis, albeit the number of foreigners that opted to change their residence saw a significant growth in the last years. In 2022, Colombians ranked first as the foreign nationality that most relocated to Spain, distantly followed by Moroccans and Ukranians.

Spain does not have the highest number of immigrants in Europe In recent years, the European Union confronted a rising number of refugees arriving from the Middle East. Migration figures show that Germany accommodated approximately 15 million foreign-born citizens, ranking it as the country that most hosted immigrants in Europe in 2022. By comparison, Spain’s foreign population stood slightly over seven million, positioning the Western Mediterranean country third on the European list of foreign-born population. Unfortunately, thousands of persons have died ore gone missing trying to reach Spanish territory, as more and more irregular migrants opt to use dangerous maritime routes to arrive at Southern Europe from Africa's coasts.

Canada’s appeal as an immigration destination has been increasing over the past two decades, with a total of 464,265 people immigrating to the country in 2024. This figure is an increase from 2000-2001, when approximately 252,527 immigrants came to Canada. Immigration to the Great White North Between July 1, 2022 and June 30, 2023, there were an estimated 199,297 immigrants to Ontario, making it the most popular immigration destination out of any province. While the number of immigrants has been increasing over the years, in 2024 over half of surveyed Canadians believed that there were too many immigrants in the country. However, in 2017, the Canadian government announced its aim to significantly increase the number of permanent residents to Canada in order to combat an aging workforce and the decline of working-age adults. Profiles of immigrants to Canada The gender of immigrants to Canada in 2023 was just about an even split, with 234,279 male immigrants and 234,538 female immigrants. In addition, most foreign-born individuals in Canada came from India, followed by China and the Philippines. The United States was the fifth most common origin country for foreign-born residents in Canada.