30 datasets found
  1. Sex offenders in the U.S. - registered number by state

    • statista.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista, Sex offenders in the U.S. - registered number by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/203854/number-of-registered-sex-offenders-in-the-us-by-state/
    Explore at:
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2011
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This statistic shows the number of registered sex offenders in the U.S. in 2011 by state. ***** sex offenders were registered in the state of Maine.

  2. Evaluation of the Implementation of the Sex Offender Treatment Intervention...

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    • gimi9.com
    • +1more
    Updated Oct 29, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Miner, Michael H.; Robinson, Beatrice; Swinburne Romine, Rebecca; Thornton, David; Hanson, R. Karl (2020). Evaluation of the Implementation of the Sex Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Scale (SOTIPS), United States, 1978-2017 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37035.v1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 29, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    Miner, Michael H.; Robinson, Beatrice; Swinburne Romine, Rebecca; Thornton, David; Hanson, R. Karl
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/37035/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/37035/terms

    Area covered
    United States, New York (state), New York City, Phoenix, Arizona
    Description

    The purpose of the project was to (1) determine whether the combined dynamic (SOTIPS) and static risk assessment (Static-99R) tools better predicted sexual recidivism than either alone, and (2) determine whether the tools could be implemented successfully in more representative populations. Previous research has established a "status quo" for risk assessments. This study was set within the context of the developing sexual offender risk prediction field, where investigators explored reliable and valid means to assess what have been termed "dynamic risk factors." Instruments that identify the specific psychological risk factors present in the individual offender ought to allow treatment for that individual to be tailored to these specific needs, thus increasing its effectiveness. Thus, instruments have been designed to: Assess psychological factors that are empirically related to sexual recidivism, thus creating a basis for selecting treatment targets Show robust incremental predictive validity relative to Static-99R or other measures of static risk factors Measure change in a way that is convincingly related to sexual recidivism Incorporate and point risk managers towards some of the factors identified in the desistance literature Improve the effectiveness of treatment in reducing sexual recidivism Enrollment of sex offenders in the evaluation study began in April 2013. To be included, offenders needed to be Static-99R eligible (an adult male convicted of a contact or non-contact sex offense with an identifiable victim), mentally cognizant, released to community supervision, and at least 18 years old in January 2013 in Maricopa County and April 2013 in New York City.

  3. Number of forcible rape cases U.S. 2023, by state

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 28, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Number of forcible rape cases U.S. 2023, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/232524/forcible-rape-cases-in-the-us-by-state/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 28, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2023, Texas had the highest number of forcible rape cases in the United States, with 15,097 reported rapes. Delaware had the lowest number of reported forcible rape cases at 194. Number vs. rate It is perhaps unsurprising that Texas and California reported the highest number of rapes, as these states have the highest population of states in the U.S. When looking at the rape rate, or the number of rapes per 100,000 of the population, a very different picture is painted: Alaska was the state with the highest rape rate in the country in 2023, with California ranking as 30th in the nation. The prevalence of rape Rape and sexual assault are notorious for being underreported crimes, which means that the prevalence of sex crimes is likely much higher than what is reported. Additionally, more than a third of women worry about being sexually assaulted, and most sexual assaults are perpetrated by someone the victim knew.

  4. G

    Sex Offender Registry Software Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Aug 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). Sex Offender Registry Software Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/sex-offender-registry-software-market
    Explore at:
    csv, pdf, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 22, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Sex Offender Registry Software Market Outlook




    According to our latest research, the global sex offender registry software market size reached USD 1.42 billion in 2024, and it is expected to grow at a robust CAGR of 9.1% during the forecast period, reaching USD 3.08 billion by 2033. The rapid growth of this market is primarily attributed to the increasing need for public safety, stringent government regulations, and the rising adoption of advanced digital solutions for crime prevention and community protection. As per the latest research, the market is witnessing accelerated investments in technology upgrades and integration of artificial intelligence, significantly transforming the landscape of sex offender management and monitoring.




    One of the primary growth factors propelling the sex offender registry software market is the global emphasis on public safety and the mounting pressure on law enforcement agencies to ensure transparent and accessible sex offender information. The proliferation of high-profile criminal cases involving repeat offenders has heightened public awareness and demand for efficient, real-time registry systems. Governments across the world are enacting stricter compliance mandates, requiring agencies to maintain up-to-date, accurate, and accessible sex offender registries. This regulatory push is fueling investments in robust software solutions that not only automate data collection and reporting but also facilitate seamless information sharing across jurisdictions, making offender tracking more efficient and reliable.




    Technological advancements are also playing a crucial role in shaping the evolution of the sex offender registry software market. The integration of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and predictive analytics into these platforms is enabling authorities to proactively identify patterns and potential risks, thereby enhancing preventive measures. Additionally, cloud-based deployment models are gaining momentum, offering scalability, remote accessibility, and cost efficiencies. These innovations are particularly beneficial for agencies with limited IT infrastructure, enabling them to leverage state-of-the-art solutions without significant upfront investments. Furthermore, the increasing adoption of mobile applications and real-time notification systems is empowering communities and educational institutions to stay informed and vigilant, further driving the market’s growth.




    Another significant growth driver is the collaborative efforts between law enforcement agencies, government organizations, and educational institutions to create a unified approach toward offender management. The interoperability of modern registry software allows for seamless data exchange between federal, state, and local agencies, eliminating information silos and ensuring comprehensive oversight. These collaborative frameworks are further supported by public-private partnerships, which are fostering innovation and accelerating the deployment of next-generation solutions. As a result, agencies are better equipped to comply with evolving regulatory requirements, respond to incidents more effectively, and maintain public trust through transparent operations.




    Regionally, North America continues to dominate the sex offender registry software market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The United States, in particular, has a well-established legal framework for sex offender registration, driving significant demand for advanced software solutions. Europe is witnessing steady growth, driven by harmonized data protection laws and increased cross-border cooperation. Meanwhile, Asia Pacific is emerging as a high-growth region, fueled by rapid urbanization, rising crime rates, and government initiatives to modernize law enforcement infrastructure. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also showing promising potential, albeit at a slower pace, as awareness and regulatory frameworks continue to evolve.





    Component Analysis



  5. Forcible rape rate U.S. 2023, by state

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 28, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Forcible rape rate U.S. 2023, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/232563/forcible-rape-rate-in-the-us-by-state/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 28, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Alaska saw the highest rape rate in the United States in 2023, with 118.4 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants. The lowest rate was found in New Jersey, with 17.9 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants. Sexual assault in Alaska Fighting sexual assault in Alaska is particularly difficult due to small, isolated, close-knit communities who can be wary of airing their dirty laundry to outsiders, as well as a low number of law enforcement employees in the state. In addition, Alaska’s low population is spread out over a large land area, meaning that in the event of an assault being reported to police, it can take law enforcement hours, or even days, to reach the most isolated communities. The victims of sexual assault There tends to be more reported female victims of sexual assault than male victims. However, since sexual assault is typically an underreported crime, especially among males, these figures could be, and probably are, much higher. In addition, many victims of sexual offenses tend to be young, although sexual assault can occur at any age.

  6. d

    Data from: Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children in the United States,...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • icpsr.umich.edu
    Updated Nov 14, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Institute of Justice (2025). Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children in the United States, 1997-2000 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/commercial-sexual-exploitation-of-children-in-the-united-states-1997-2000-a8def
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 14, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Institute of Justice
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This project undertook the systematic collection of first-generation data concerning the nature, extent, and seriousness of child sexual exploitation (CSE) in the United States. The project was organized around the following research objectives: (1) identification of the nature, extent, and underlying causes of CSE and the commercial sexual exploitation of children (CSEC) occurring in the United States, (2) identification of those subgroups of children that were at the greatest risk of being sexually exploited, (3) identification of subgroups of adult perpetrators of sex crimes against children, and (4) identification of the modes of operation and other methods used by organized criminal units to recruit children into sexually exploitative activities. The study involved surveying senior staff members of nongovernment organizations (NGOs) and government organizations (GOs) in the United States known to be dealing with persons involved in the transnational trafficking of children for sexual purposes. Part 1 consists of survey data from nongovernment organizations. These were local child and family agencies serving runaway and homeless youth. Part 2 consists of survey data from government organizations. These organizations were divided into local, state, and federal agencies. Local organizations included municipal law enforcement, county law enforcement, prosecutors, public defenders, and corrections. State organizations included state child welfare directors, prosecutors, and public defenders. Federal organizations included the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Public Defenders, Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Attorneys, United States Customs, and the United States Postal Service. Variables in Parts 1 and 2 include the organization's city, state, and ZIP code, the type of services provided or type of law enforcement agency, how the agency was funded, the scope of the agency's service area, how much emphasis was placed on CSEC as a policy issue or a service issue, conditions that might influence the number of CSEC cases, how staff were trained to deal with CSEC cases, how victims were identified, the number of children that experienced child abuse, sexual abuse, pornography, or other exploitation in 1999 and 2000 by age and gender, methods of recruitment, family history of victims, gang involvement, and substance abuse history of victims.

  7. Number of child abuse perpetrators U.S. 2023, by race/ethnicity

    • statista.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista, Number of child abuse perpetrators U.S. 2023, by race/ethnicity [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/418475/number-of-perpetrators-in-child-abuse-cases-in-the-us-by-race-ethnicity/
    Explore at:
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2023, about 187,633 perpetrators of child abuse in the United States were white. In that same year, about 82,421 perpetrators of child abuse were Hispanic, and 25,113 were of unknown ethnic origin.

  8. G

    Sex Offender Management Software Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Sep 1, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). Sex Offender Management Software Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/sex-offender-management-software-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, pptx, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 1, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Sex Offender Management Software Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the global Sex Offender Management Software market size in 2024 stands at USD 1.32 billion, marking a significant milestone in digital public safety solutions. The market is experiencing robust momentum with a recorded CAGR of 9.8% from 2025 to 2033. By the end of 2033, the market is forecasted to reach a substantial value of USD 3.03 billion. This growth is primarily driven by the increasing demand for advanced offender tracking, data management, and compliance solutions among law enforcement and government agencies worldwide, as per our latest findings.



    The expanding digitalization of law enforcement and corrections systems is a major growth factor for the Sex Offender Management Software market. With the proliferation of connected devices and the growing need for real-time offender monitoring, agencies are seeking more sophisticated tools to manage, track, and analyze sex offender data. The integration of artificial intelligence, predictive analytics, and geospatial mapping has become essential for agencies aiming to enhance public safety and ensure compliance with complex regulatory frameworks. Additionally, the rising public awareness and advocacy for community safety have compelled government bodies to invest in robust offender management solutions, further propelling market growth.



    Another key driver is the stringent regulatory landscape governing sex offender registration and monitoring across various jurisdictions. Governments worldwide are enforcing stricter compliance requirements, mandating the use of comprehensive software platforms for data collection, risk assessment, and interagency collaboration. The need for seamless information sharing between state, local, and federal agencies is fueling the adoption of cloud-based and on-premises solutions, which offer scalability, security, and interoperability. This regulatory push, combined with the increasing sophistication of criminal activities, underscores the critical role of Sex Offender Management Software in modern criminal justice systems.



    Moreover, the ongoing advancements in cloud technology and cybersecurity are significantly enhancing the capabilities of Sex Offender Management Software. Agencies are increasingly opting for cloud-based deployment models to enable remote access, facilitate data sharing, and reduce IT infrastructure costs. The integration of mobile applications and secure communication tools is streamlining field operations, allowing officers to access offender profiles, update records, and receive alerts in real time. These technological innovations are not only improving operational efficiency but are also ensuring the integrity and confidentiality of sensitive data, which is vital in the context of sex offender management.



    In the realm of correctional facilities and law enforcement, Jail Management Software is becoming an indispensable tool for streamlining operations and enhancing security measures. This software offers comprehensive solutions for managing inmate records, tracking facility operations, and ensuring compliance with regulatory standards. By integrating with existing systems, Jail Management Software facilitates seamless information sharing and coordination among various departments, thereby improving overall efficiency and effectiveness. The ability to automate routine tasks, such as booking, release, and visitation scheduling, allows staff to focus on more critical aspects of facility management. Moreover, the inclusion of real-time reporting and analytics capabilities empowers decision-makers with actionable insights, enabling them to respond swiftly to emerging challenges and maintain a secure environment.



    From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the Sex Offender Management Software market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, driven by mature law enforcement infrastructure and stringent regulatory mandates. Europe is also witnessing significant growth, propelled by increasing investments in public safety technologies and harmonized cross-border offender tracking initiatives. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is emerging as a lucrative market due to rising urbanization, government digitization programs, and growing public awareness of sexual offense prevention. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are gradually catching up, with governments recognizin

  9. Child abuse in the U.S. - perpetrators 2021, by state

    • statista.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista, Child abuse in the U.S. - perpetrators 2021, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/418354/number-of-perpetrators-in-child-abuse-cases-in-the-us-by-state/
    Explore at:
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2021
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2021, about 652 child abuse perpetrators were reported in Wyoming. In California, there were 49,073 reported perpetrators. Nationwide, about 452,313 child abuse perpetrators were reported in that year.

  10. Illinois DOC labeled faces dataset

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Dec 6, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    David J. Fisher (2019). Illinois DOC labeled faces dataset [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/davidjfisher/illinois-doc-labeled-faces-dataset/code
    Explore at:
    zip(6556377362 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 6, 2019
    Authors
    David J. Fisher
    License

    https://www.usa.gov/government-works/https://www.usa.gov/government-works/

    Area covered
    Illinois
    Description

    This is a dataset of prisoner mugshots and associated data (height, weight, etc). The copyright status is public domain, since it's produced by the government, the photographs do not have sufficient artistic merit, and a mere collection of facts aren't copyrightable.

    The source is the Illinois Dept. of Corrections. In total, there are 68149 entries, of which a few hundred have shoddy data.

    It's useful for neural network training, since it has pictures from both front and side, and they're (manually) labeled with date of birth, name (useful for clustering), weight, height, hair color, eye color, sex, race, and some various goodies such as sentence duration and whether they're sex offenders.

    Here is the readme file:

    ---BEGIN README---
    Scraped from the Illinois DOC.

    https://www.idoc.state.il.us/subsections/search/inms_print.asp?idoc=
    https://www.idoc.state.il.us/subsections/search/pub_showfront.asp?idoc=
    https://www.idoc.state.il.us/subsections/search/pub_showside.asp?idoc=

    paste <(cat ids.txt | sed 's/^/http:\/\/www.idoc.state.il.us\/subsections\/search\/pub_showside.asp\?idoc=/g') <(cat ids.txt| sed 's/^/ out=/g' | sed 's/$/.jpg/g') -d ' ' > showside.txt
    paste <(cat ids.txt | sed 's/^/http:\/\/www.idoc.state.il.us\/subsections\/search\/pub_showfront.asp\?idoc=/g') <(cat ids.txt| sed 's/^/ out=/g' | sed 's/$/.jpg/g') -d ' ' > showfront.txt
    paste <(cat ids.txt | sed 's/^/http:\/\/www.idoc.state.il.us\/subsections\/search\/inms_print.asp\?idoc=/g') <(cat ids.txt| sed 's/^/ out=/g' | sed 's/$/.html/g') -d ' ' > inmates_print.txt

    aria2c -i ../inmates_print.txt -j4 -x4 -l ../log-$(pwd|rev|cut -d/ -f 1|rev)-$(date +%s).txt

    Then use htmltocsv.py to get the csv. Note that the script is very poorly written and may have errors. It also doesn't do anything with the warrant-related info, although there are some commented-out lines which may be relevant.
    Also note that it assumes all the HTML files are located in the inmates directory., and overwrites any csv files in csv if there are any.

    front.7z contains mugshots from the front
    side.7z contains mugshots from the side
    inmates.7z contains all the html files
    csv contains the html files converted to CSV

    The reason for packaging the images is that many torrent clients would otherwise crash if attempting to load the torrent.

    All CSV files contain headers describing the nature of the columns. For person.csv, the id is unique. For marks.csv and sentencing.csv, it is not.
    Note that the CSV files use semicolons as delimiters and also end with a trailing semicolon. If this is unsuitable, edit the arr2csvR function in htmltocsv.py.

    There are 68149 inmates in total, although some (a few hundred) are marked as "Unknown"/"N/A"/"" in one or more fields.

    The "height" column has been processed to contain the height in inches, rather than the height in feet and inches expressed as "X ft YY in."
    Some inmates were marked "Not Available", this has been replaced with "N/A".
    Likewise, the "weight" column has been altered "XXX lbs." -> "XXX". Again, some are marked "N/A".

    The "date of birth" column has some inmates marked as "Not Available" and others as "". There doesn't appear to be any pattern. It may be related to the institution they are kept in. Otherwise, the format is MM/DD/YYYY.

    The "weight" column is often rounded to the nearest 5 lbs.

    Statistics for hair:
    43305 Black
    17371 Brown
    2887 Blonde or Strawberry
    2539 Gray or Partially Gray
    740 Red or Auburn
    624 Bald
    396 Not Available
    209 Salt and Pepper
    70 White
    7 Sandy
    1 Unknown

    Statistics for sex:
    63409 Male
    4740 Female

    Statistics for race:
    37991 Black
    20992 White
    8637 Hispanic
    235 Asian
    104 Amer Indian
    94 Unknown
    92 Bi-Racial
    4

    Statistics for eyes:
    51714 Brown
    7808 Blue
    4259 Hazel
    2469 Green
    1382 Black
    420 Not Available
    87 Gray
    9 Maroon
    1 Unknown
    ---END README---

    Here is a formal summary:

    ---BEGIN SUMMARY---
    Documentation:

    1. Title: Illinois DOC dataset

    2. Source Information
      -- Creators: Illinois DOC
      -- Illinois Department of Corrections
      1301 Concordia Court
      P.O. Box 19277
      Springfield, IL 62794-9277
      (217) 558-2200 x 2008
      -- Donor: Anonymous
      -- Date: 2019

    3. Past Usage:
      -- None

    4. Relevant Information:
      -- All CSV files contain headers describing the nature of the columns. For person.csv, the id is unique. For marks.csv and sentencing.csv, it is not.
      -- Note that the CSV files use semicolons as delimiters and also end with a trailing semicolon. If this is unsuitable, edit the arr2csvR function in htmltocsv...

  11. National Crime Victimization Survey, Concatenated File, [United States],...

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    ascii, delimited, r +3
    Updated Sep 11, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United States. Bureau of Justice Statistics (2024). National Crime Victimization Survey, Concatenated File, [United States], 1992-2023 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38963.v1
    Explore at:
    stata, spss, delimited, sas, ascii, rAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 11, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    United States. Bureau of Justice Statistics
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/38963/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/38963/terms

    Time period covered
    1992 - 2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), previously called the National Crime Survey (NCS), has been collecting data on personal and household victimization through an ongoing survey of a nationally-representative sample of residential addresses since 1973. The NCVS was designed with four primary objectives: (1) to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, (2) to estimate the number and types of crimes not reported to the police, (3) to provide uniform measures of selected types of crimes, and (4) to permit comparisons over time and types of areas. Beginning in 1992, the survey categorizes crimes as "personal" or "property." Personal crimes include rape and sexual assault, robbery, aggravated and simple assault, and purse-snatching/pocket-picking, while property crimes include burglary, theft, motor vehicle theft, and vandalism. Each respondent is asked a series of screen questions designed to determine whether she or he was victimized during the six-month period preceding the first day of the month of the interview. A "household respondent" is also asked to report on crimes against the household as a whole (e.g., burglary, motor vehicle theft). The data include type of crime, month, time, and location of the crime, relationship between victim and offender, characteristics of the offender, self-protective actions taken by the victim during the incident and results of those actions, consequences of the victimization, type of property lost, whether the crime was reported to police and reasons for reporting or not reporting, and offender use of weapons, drugs, and alcohol. Basic demographic information such as age, race, gender, and income is also collected, to enable analysis of crime by various subpopulations. This dataset represents the concatenated version of the NCVS on a collection year basis for 1992-2023. A collection year contains records from interviews conducted in the 12 months of the given year. Under the collection year format, victimizations are counted in the year the interview is conducted, regardless of the year when the crime incident occurred.For additional information on the dataset, please see the documentation for the data from the most current year of the NCVS, ICPSR Study 38962.

  12. U

    Georgia State Poll, Summer 1997

    • dataverse-staging.rdmc.unc.edu
    Updated Nov 30, 2007
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    UNC Dataverse (2007). Georgia State Poll, Summer 1997 [Dataset]. https://dataverse-staging.rdmc.unc.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:1902.29/D-31413
    Explore at:
    pdf(19832), application/x-spss-por(183024), tsv(190289), application/x-sas-transport(642320)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 30, 2007
    Dataset provided by
    UNC Dataverse
    License

    https://dataverse-staging.rdmc.unc.edu/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/1.0/customlicense?persistentId=hdl:1902.29/D-31413https://dataverse-staging.rdmc.unc.edu/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/1.0/customlicense?persistentId=hdl:1902.29/D-31413

    Area covered
    Georgia
    Description

    The Georgia State Poll is a mechanism for state agencies, academic researchers and non profit organizations to collect data on topics of interest while sharing the cost of the survey. A core set of demographic questions is always asked, and most polls also include performance ratings for political figures. This survey collected responses from Georgia residents on various issues. These include Bill Clinton, Newt Gingrich, Telemarketing, Pollution, sex offenders.

  13. Metropolitan areas with the highest rape rate in the U.S. 2023

    • statista.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista, Metropolitan areas with the highest rape rate in the U.S. 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/605581/us-metropolitan-areas-with-the-highest-rape-rate/
    Explore at:
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2023, Anchorage, Alaska had the highest rape rate in the United States with 144.6 offenses of rape per 100,000 inhabitants. The St. Joseph metropolitan statistical area, in Missouri and Kansas, had the second-highest rape rate in the country, at 141.4 offenses per 100,000 of the population.

  14. Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: National Incident-Based Reporting...

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    ascii, delimited, r +3
    Updated Dec 12, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United States. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2024). Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: National Incident-Based Reporting System, [United States], 2021 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38690.v1
    Explore at:
    delimited, ascii, sas, spss, stata, rAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 12, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    United States. Federal Bureau of Investigation
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/38690/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/38690/terms

    Time period covered
    2021
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) is a part of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR), administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In the late 1970s, the law enforcement community called for a thorough evaluative study of the UCR with the objective of recommending an expanded and enhanced UCR program to meet law enforcement needs into the 21st century. The FBI fully concurred with the need for an updated program to meet contemporary needs and provided its support, formulating a comprehensive redesign effort. Following a multiyear study, a "Blueprint for the Future of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program" was developed. Using the "Blueprint," and in consultation with local and state law enforcement executives, the FBI formulated new guidelines for the Uniform Crime Reports. The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) was implemented to meet these guidelines. NIBRS data as formatted by the FBI are stored in a single file. These data are organized by various segment levels (record types). There are six main segment levels: administrative, offense, property, victim, offender, and arrestee. Each segment level has a different length and layout. There are other segment levels which occur with less frequency than the six main levels. Significant computing resources are necessary to work with the data in its single-file format. In addition, the user must be sophisticated in working with data in complex file types. While it is convenient to think of NIBRS as a hierarchical file, its structure is more similar to a relational database in that there are key variables that link the different segment levels together. NIBRS data are archived at ICPSR as 11 separate data files per year, which may be merged by using linkage variables. Prior to 2013 the data were archived and distributed as 13 separate data files, including three separate batch header record files. Starting with the 2013 data, the FBI combined the three batch header files into one file. Consequently, ICPSR instituted new file numbering for the data. NIBRS data focus on a variety of aspects of a crime incident. Part 2 (formerly Part 4), Administrative Segment, offers data on the incident itself (date and time). Each crime incident is delineated by one administrative segment record. Also provided are Part 3 (formerly Part 5), Offense Segment (offense type, location, weapon use, and bias motivation), Part 4 (formerly Part 6), Property Segment (type of property loss, property description, property value, drug type and quantity), Part 5 (formerly Part 7), Victim Segment (age, sex, race, ethnicity, and injuries), Part 6 (formerly Part 8), Offender Segment (age, sex, and race), and Part 7 (formerly Part 9), Arrestee Segment (arrest date, age, sex, race, and weapon use). The Batch Header Segment (Part 1, formerly Parts 1-3) separates and identifies individual police agencies by Originating Agency Identifier (ORI). Batch Header information, which is contained on three records for each ORI, includes agency name, geographic location, and population of the area. Part 8 (formerly Part 10), Group B Arrest Report Segment, includes arrestee data for Group B crimes. Window Segments files (Parts 9-11, formerly Parts 11-13) pertain to incidents for which the complete Group A Incident Report was not submitted to the FBI. In general, a Window Segment record will be generated if the incident occurred prior to January 1 of the previous year or if the incident occurred prior to when the agency started NIBRS reporting. As with the UCR, participation in NIBRS is voluntary on the part of law enforcement agencies. The data are not a representative sample of crime in the United States. Recognizing many differences in computing resources and that many users will be interested in only one or two segment levels, ICPSR has decided to make the data available as multiple files. Each NIBRS segment level in the FBI's single-file format has been made into a separate rectangular ASCII data file. Linkage (key) variables are used to perform analyses that involve two or more segment levels. If the user is interested in variables contained in one segment level, then the data are easy to work with since each segment level file is simply a rectangular ASCII data file. Setup files are available to read each segment level. Also, with only one segment level, the issue of

  15. USA - reported forcible rape rate 1990-2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 18, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). USA - reported forcible rape rate 1990-2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/191226/reported-forcible-rape-rate-in-the-us-since-1990/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 18, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2023, the rate of forcible rapes in the United States stood at 38 per 100,000 inhabitants. As the FBI revised the definition of rape in 2013, the 2023 rate is a slight decrease from 1990, when there were 41.2 forcible rapes per 100,000 inhabitants. What is forcible rape? According to the FBI, forcible rape is defined as “sexual penetration, no matter how slight, with a body part or object without the consent of the victim.” This definition changed in 2013 from the previous definition, which specified “carnal knowledge of a female victim forcibly and against her will.” Attempted rape was included in the previous definition, but statutory rape and other sexual offenses were excluded. The old definition was seen as problematic, as people of any gender can be raped. Since the revision of the definition of rape, reported rapes increased, although it is not clear if this is due to the revised definition or if the rate itself has increased. Rape in the United States While rape and sexual assault have been extensively talked about in the U.S. in recent years, especially since the start of the #metoo movement, there is still a large number of sexual offences committed each year. Sadly, the majority of sex offences in the U.S. are carried out against individuals age 20 and under. Astoundingly, the Anchorage, Alaska metropolitan area had the highest rape rate in the United States in 2023, followed by St Joseph in Missouri and Kansas. Since rape and sexual assault continue to be underreported in the United States, it is important to find a solution to this devastating problem.

  16. o

    Jacob Kaplan's Concatenated Files: Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program...

    • openicpsr.org
    Updated Oct 20, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jacob Kaplan (2020). Jacob Kaplan's Concatenated Files: Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program Data: Human Trafficking 2013-2019 [Dataset]. https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/117974/version/V2/view;jsessionid=0D7A7D28AB192F23D59B637FA1561C99?path=/openicpsr/117974/fcr:versions/V2/human_trafficking_2013_2019_dta.zip&type=file
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 20, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    University of Pennsylvania
    Authors
    Jacob Kaplan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2013 - 2019
    Area covered
    United States
    Description
    For any questions about this data please email me at jacob@crimedatatool.com. If you use this data, cite it.

    Version 2 release notes
    • Adds 2019 data.

    This Human Trafficking data set is an FBI data set that is part of the annual Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program data. This data contains information about human trafficking offenses reported in the United States. There are two crimes that are included in this data set: commercial sex acts and involuntary servitude. The information is the number of these crimes that are reported, to have actually occurred (based upon an investigation into the report), to not have occurred ("unfounded"), cleared by arrest of at least one person, and cleared by arrest where all offenders are under the age of 18.

    The data sets here combine data from the years 2013-2018 (the only years available) into a single file for annual data and a single file for monthly data (data does not get more precise than monthly counts). I also added state, county, and place FIPS code from the LEAIC (crosswalk).

    All the data was is from the FBI and read into R using the package asciiSetupReader. All work to clean the data and save it in various file formats was also done in R. For the R code used to clean this data, see here. https://github.com/jacobkap/crime_data">https://github.com/jacobkap/crime_data. The raw (in fixed-width ASCII format) was downloaded on the FBI's website here: https://crime-data-explorer.fr.cloud.gov/downloads-and-docs">https://crime-data-explorer.fr.cloud.gov/downloads-and-docs

    The following definitions are from the FBI's UCR manual which is included in each zip file available to download. Please see pages 55-58 of that manual for more information, including examples of each offense.

    Human Trafficking - Commercial Sex Acts: Inducing a person by force, fraud, or coercion to participate in commercial sex acts, or in which the person induced to perform such act(s) has not attained 18 years of age.

    Human Trafficking - Involuntary Servitude: The obtaining of a person(s) through recruitment, harboring, transportation, or provision, and subjecting such persons by force, fraud, or coercion into involuntary servitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery (not to include commercial sex acts).
  17. c

    Number of Violent Crimes by Type and Gender in 2024

    • consumershield.com
    csv
    Updated Oct 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ConsumerShield Research Team (2025). Number of Violent Crimes by Type and Gender in 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.consumershield.com/articles/victims-of-violent-crime-by-gender
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 8, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    ConsumerShield Research Team
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States of America
    Description

    The graph shows the number of violent crime victims in the United States by gender and type in 2024. The x-axis represents the crime type, while the y-axis indicates the number of male and female victims reported annually.

  18. c

    Number of Violent Crime Victims by Gender in U.S., 2015–2025

    • consumershield.com
    csv
    Updated Oct 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ConsumerShield Research Team (2025). Number of Violent Crime Victims by Gender in U.S., 2015–2025 [Dataset]. https://www.consumershield.com/articles/victims-of-violent-crime-by-gender
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 8, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    ConsumerShield Research Team
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States of America
    Description

    The graph shows the number of violent crime victims in the United States by gender from 2015 to 2025. The x-axis represents the years, while the y-axis indicates the number of male and female victims reported annually. Male victim counts range from a low of 181,851 in 2015 to a peak of 580,445 in 2023, while female victim counts range from 165,060 in 2015 to a high of 531,872 in 2023. Both genders show a consistent upward trend from 2015 to 2023, followed by a sharp drop in 2025. The data illustrates parallel trends for both male and female victims across the observed period.

  19. Number of child abuse victims U.S. 2023, by race or ethnicity

    • statista.com
    Updated Apr 25, 2014
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2014). Number of child abuse victims U.S. 2023, by race or ethnicity [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/254853/number-of-victims-of-child-abuse-in-the-us-by-race-ethnicity/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 25, 2014
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2023, there were about 541,713 victims of child abuse in the United States. In that year, about 129,187 children of Hispanic origin were reported to be abused in the country. A further 119,898 Black children were the victims of abuse in that year.

  20. HM Prison and Probation Service offender equalities annual report 2019 to...

    • gov.uk
    • s3.amazonaws.com
    Updated Nov 26, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ministry of Justice (2020). HM Prison and Probation Service offender equalities annual report 2019 to 2020 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/hm-prison-and-probation-service-offender-equalities-annual-report-2019-to-2020
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 26, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Ministry of Justice
    Description

    The Equality Act 2010 lists 9 Protected Characteristics:

    • Age,
    • Sex
    • Race
    • Disability
    • Sexual Orientation
    • Religion or Belief
    • Gender Reassignment
    • Marriage/Civil Partnership
    • Pregnancy/Maternity

    This report focuses on those protected characteristics where data are collected, and are of sufficient quality for statistics to be meaningful. In general, this report is limited to analysis on sex, age, race (ethnicity) and religious belief for these reasons. Where data are available for other protected characteristics at sufficient quality and with sufficient coverage to be meaningful, they are also presented and considered.

    The report presents some analysis by individual characteristic and is meant to serve as a guide for further research. In many cases, more than one factor (e.g. age and another protected characteristic, criminal history, socio-economic) may have an effect on an outcome.

    Pre-release list

    The HMPPS Annual Digest is produced and handled by the Ministry of Justice’s (MOJ) analytical professionals and production staff. Pre-release access of up to 24 hours is granted to the following persons:

    Ministry of Justice

    • Director General, Probation
    • Interim Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Justice
    • Chief Financial officer, Ministry of Justice
    • Director General, Prisons
    • Director, Analytical Services
    • Interim Director General for the Policy and Strategy Group.
    • Deputy Director, Head of Prison and Probation Analytical Services
    • Head of Custodial Performance
    • Director – Access to Justice Policy
    • Head of HMPPS HR Corporate Statistics
    • Head of HMPPS Operational analysis
    • Head of HR Analysis, Reporting and Modelling
    • Head of prison, probation and reoffending statistics
    • Joint Acting Head of Profession (Statistics)
    • Deputy Director, Youth Justic Reform Policy
    • Divisional Director - Diversity, Inclusion & Wellbeing, Diversity, Inclusion and wellbeing
    • Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State
    • Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Minister for Prisons and Rehabilitation
    • Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Minister for Victims, Youth and Family Justice
    • Permanent Secretary office
    • Head of News, External Communication Deputy Director, Head of News, Ministry of Justice
    • Press officer x 8
    • Private secretaries x 11
    • Special advisor
    • Team Leader - Probation, Reoffending Statistics
    • Criminal Justice Outcomes and Equalities
    • Prisons Statistics Team Leader, Prisons team
    • Head of Contracts and Offender Equalities, Contracts and Offender Equalities Statistics
    • Statisticians x 5
    • Policy Officer, Vulnerable Offenders team
    • Policy Officer, Vulnerable Offenders team
    • Joint Deputy Head of Operational Policy Team, Operational Policy: System Delivery and Reform
    • Policy Advisor, ROTL and HDC
    • Strategic Review Lead, Intervention Services
    • Policy Advisor, Prison Education policy
    • Policy Advisor, Policy & Communications

    HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS)

    • Chief Executive Officer, HMPPS
    • Executive Director, Strategy, Planning and Performance Directorate
    • Director Security, Order & Counter Terrorism
    • Executive Director Public Sector Prisons South
    • Executive Director of Safety and Rehabilitation
    • Senior business manager Prisons, CEO office, HMPPS
    • Head of EM Contract Management
    • EM Contract Management
    • Head of Electronic Monitoring operations and policy
    • Deputy Director, Interventions and Operational Services
    • Head of Equalities and Lammy Equalities
    • Policy Official: Licence recalls
    • Head of HMPPS probation equalities
    • Head of Interventions Services
    • Senior Women’s Policy Manager
    • Head of HMPPS Womans team
    • Mother and Baby units, Policy officer
    • Quality and Effectiveness lead, HMPPS
    • HMPPS Diversity and Inclusion
    • Head of Prison Diversity and Inclusion
    • Prison Groups director
    • HMPPS Senior Diversity and Inclusion manager
    • Head of Security Procedures team
    • Governing Governor

    Other government departments

    • Government Equalities Office (Cabinet office)
    • Private Secretary to Baroness Berridge
    • Private Secretary to Kemi Badenoch
    • Chief Press Officer, Governme

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista, Sex offenders in the U.S. - registered number by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/203854/number-of-registered-sex-offenders-in-the-us-by-state/
Organization logo

Sex offenders in the U.S. - registered number by state

Explore at:
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
2011
Area covered
United States
Description

This statistic shows the number of registered sex offenders in the U.S. in 2011 by state. ***** sex offenders were registered in the state of Maine.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu