As of 2024, Massachusetts was ranked as the best state to have a baby in the United States, followed by North Dakota and Minnesota. On the other hand, Mississippi was ranked as the worst state to have a baby. The U.S. state rankings for best states to have a baby were created using ** metrics, which included key metrics like fertility clinics per capita, obstetrician-gynecologists availability, prenatal care access, and birth rates. The ** metrics were grouped under four categories — costs, healthcare, baby friendliness, and family friendliness.

In 2024, across all states in the United States, ********* was ranked first with a health index score of *****, followed by ************ and ************. The health index score was calculated by measuring 42 healthcare metrics relevant to health costs, access, and outcome.

This data set contains ratings data for State of Texas Issuers, including State agencies, Institutions of Higher Education and Conduit Borrowers. Excludes commercial paper issuances. The rating information includes rating agency, assigned rating, rating fee, bond insurance and credit enhancements.

This API is designed to find the rankings by geography within the state for a specific metric (population or household) and rank (any of the metrics from provider, demographic, technology or speed). The results are the top ten and bottom ten records within the state for the particular geography type and my area rankings. Additionally we include +/- 5 rankings from the 'my' area rank.

This statistic shows a ranking of the U.S. states based on long-run solvency index in the fiscal year of 2016. The long-run solvency index is the sum of the standardized values of the net asset ratio, long-term liability ratio, and long-term liability per capita. In the fiscal year of 2016, Nebraska was ranked first in the list with an index score of 10.98.

State comparisons data for enrollment in public grades K-12, degree college, dropout grades, average salary for public school teachers, net tuition revenues, etc. Data include a national ranking.

This statistic shows a ranking of the best U.S. federal states to live in, according to selected metrics and based on a survey among more than 530,000 Americans. The survey was conducted between January 2011 and June 2012. The findings are presented as index scores composed of the scores regarding various parameters*. According to this index, Utah is the city with the highest liveability and life quality, as it scored 7.5 points.

The State Review Framework is a primary means by which EPA conducts oversight of three core federal statutes: Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The routine, nationwide review provides a consistent process for evaluating the performance of state, local and EPA compliance and enforcement programs. The overarching goal of the reviews is to ensure fair and consistent enforcement necessary to protect human health and the environment.

Comprehensive dataset of 91,745 Hotels in United States as of August, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.

In 2022, across all states in the United States, Vermont was ranked as having the best mental health care, followed by Massachusetts and Rhode Island. On the other hand, Texas had the worst mental health care in the U.S., ranking last on the list. The best mental health care ranking was based on scores that measured ***** healthcare metrics relevant to access to treatment, services, and insurance for mental illness in the U.S. in 2022.

State comparisons data for births, deaths, infant death, disease, abortion, median age, marriages, divorces, physicians, nurses, and health insurance coverage. Data include a national ranking.

Comprehensive dataset of 21,178 Colleges in United States as of July, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.

This dataset tracks annual distribution of students across grade levels in State College Area School District and average distribution per school district in Pennsylvania

This dataset provides estimated hourly dynamic line ratings for ~84,000 transmission lines across the contiguous United States from 2007-2013. The calculation methods are described in the presentation linked below, and the associated open-source Python code repository is linked in the Resources section below.

Abbreviations used in filenames and descriptions are: - SLR: static line ratings - ALR: ambient-temperature-adjusted line ratings - NLR: ambient-temperature- and day/night-irradiance-adjusted line ratings - CLR: ambient-temperature- and clear-sky-irradiance-adjusted line ratings - ILR: ambient-temperature- and measured-irradiance-adjusted line ratings - DLR: full dynamic line ratings (including air temperature/pressure, wind speed/direction, and measured irradiance)

Transmission lines are referenced by their ID in the Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data (HIFLD) on Transmission Lines (linked in Resources section). Time indices are in UTC. The data files contain ratios between modeled hourly ratings and modeled static ratings. Columns are indexed by HIFLD ID; rows are indexed by hourly timestamps from 2007-2013 (UTC). A data directory is also included in the Resources section.

The SLR files contain modeled static ratings (the denominator of the ratios in the files described above) in amps. As described in the presentation linked in the Resources section below, SLR calculations assume an ambient air temperature of 40 C, air pressure of 101 kPa, wind speed of 2 feet per second (0.61 m/s) perpendicular to the conductor, global horizontal irradiance of 1000 W/m^2, and conductor absorptivity and emissivity of 0.8. Conductor assumptions are Linnet for ~69 kV and below, Condor for ~115 kV, Martin for ~230 kV, and Cardinal for ~345 kV and above.

Caveats and Limitations

Results are sensitive to the weather data used. Validation studies on the WIND Toolkit and NSRDB are available at: - King, J. et al. "Validation of Power Output for the WIND Toolkit", 2014 (https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/61714.pdf) - Draxl, C. et al. "Overview and Meteorological Validation of the Wind Integration National Dataset Toolkit", 2015 (https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/61740.pdf) - Sengupta, M. et al. "Validation of the National Solar Radiation Database (NSRDB) (2005-2012)", 2015 (https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/64981.pdf) - Habte, A. et al. "Evaluation of the National Solar Radiation Database (NSRDB Version 2): 1998-2015", 2017 (https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/67722.pdf)

More work is required to determine how well ratings calculated from NSRDB and WIND Toolkit data reflect the actual ratings observed by installed sensors (such as sag or tension monitors). In general, ratings calculated from modeled weather data are not a substitute for direct sensor data.

Assuming a single representative conductor type (ACSR of a single diameter) for each voltage level is an important simplification; reported line ratings at a given voltage level can vary widely.

HIFLD line routes are primarily based on imagery instead of exact construction data and may have errors.

We use historical weather data directly; calculated line ratings are thus more indicative of real-time ratings than forecasted ratings

This dataset includes the number of eligible individuals selected and enrolled in a Covered California qualified health plans (QHPs) by rating region and by reporting period. California is comprised of 19 rating regions, and each region has different pricing and health insurance options. Covered California reported data is from the California Healthcare Eligibility, Enrollment and Retention System (CalHEERS) and includes eligible individuals who selected and enrolled in a QHP, and paid their first premium. This dataset is part of public reporting requirements set forth by the California Welfare and Institutions Code 14102.5.

Natural Earth is a public domain map dataset available at 1:10, 1:50 and 1:110 million scales. Featuring tightly integrated vector and raster data, with Natural Earth you can make a variety of visually pleasing, well-crafted maps with cartography or GIS software.

This dataset is the most comprehensive look at volunteering and civic life in the 50 states and 51 cities across the country. Data include volunteer rates and rankings, civic engagement trends, and analysis.

Comprehensive dataset containing 136,949 verified School businesses in United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.

Comprehensive dataset containing 309 verified State government office businesses in Alabama, United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.

This statistic depicts an overall U.S. states health ranking in 2018, according to America's Health Rankings of the United Health Foundation. As of that year, the top state based on health was Hawaii with a score of **** above the national norm.