Facebook
TwitterIn 2020, most enterprises according to respondents have multiple tools or applications to perform various data management functions. Of the functions, back up/recovery and data classification were the approaches used most frequently with multiple apps, according to ** percent of respondents for both.
Facebook
TwitterMany challenges come with adopting a mixed-environment model. In 2023 about ** percent of respondents reported that data storage costs are one of the biggest challenges in this regard.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This collection contains a snapshot of the learning resource metadata from ESIP's Data management Training Clearinghouse (DMTC) associated with the closeout (March 30, 2023) of the Institute of Museum and Library Services funded (Award Number: LG-70-18-0092-18) Development of an Enhanced and Expanded Data Management Training Clearinghouse project. The shared metadata are a snapshot associated with the final reporting date for the project, and the associated data report is also based upon the same data snapshot on the same date.
The materials included in the collection consist of the following:
The metadata fields consist of the following:
| Fieldname | Description |
|---|---|
| abstract_data | A brief synopsis or abstract about the learning resource |
| abstract_format | Declaration for how the abstract description will be represented. |
| access_conditions | Conditions upon which the resource can be accessed beyond cost, e.g., login required. |
| access_cost | Yes or No choice stating whether othere is a fee for access to or use of the resource. |
| accessibililty_features_name | Content features of the resource, such as accessible media, alternatives and supported enhancements for accessibility. |
| accessibililty_summary | A human-readable summary of specific accessibility features or deficiencies. |
| author_names | List of authors for a resource derived from the given/first and family/last names of the personal author fields by the system |
| author_org - name - name_identifier - name_identifier_type |
|
|
authors |
|
| citation | Preferred Form of Citation. |
| completion_time | Intended Time to Complete |
|
contact |
|
| contributor_orgs - name - name_identifier - name_identifier_type - type | - Name of organization that is a secondary contributor to the learningresource. A contributor can also be an individual person. - The unique identifier for the organization contributing to the resource. - The identifier scheme associated with the unique identifier for the organization contributing to the resource. - Type of contribution to the resource made by an organization. |
| contributors - familyName - givenName - name_identifier - name_identifier_type |
- Last or family name of person(s) contributing to the resource. |
|
contributors.type |
Type of contribution to the resource made by a person. |
| created | The date on which the metadata record was first saved as part of the input workflow. |
| creator | The name of the person creating the MD record for a resource. |
| credential_status | Declaration of whether a credential is offered for comopletion of the resource. |
|
ed_frameworks | - The name of the educational framework to which the resource is aligned, if any. An educational framework is a structured description of educational concepts such as a shared curriculum, syllabus or set of learning objectives, or a vocabulary for describing some other aspect of education such as educational levels or reading ability. - A description of one or more subcategories of an educational framework to which a resource is associated. - The name of a subcategory of an educational framework to which a resource is associated. |
| expertise_level | The skill level targeted for the topic being taught. |
| id | Unique identifier for the MD record generated by the system in UUID format. |
| keywords | Important phrases or words used to describe the resource. |
| language_primary | Original language in which the learning resource being described is published or made available. |
| languages_secondary | Additional languages in which the resource is tranlated or made available, if any. |
| license | A license for use of that applies to the resource, typically indicated by URL. |
| locator_data | The identifier for the learning resource used as part of a citation, if available. |
| locator_type | Designation of citation locatorr type, e.g., DOI, ARK, Handle. |
| lr_outcomes | Descriptions of what knowledge, skills or abilities students should learn from the resource. |
| lr_type | A characteristic that describes the predominant type or kind of learning resource. |
| media_type | Media type of resource. |
| modification_date | System generated date and time when MD record is modified. |
| notes | MD Record Input Notes |
| pub_status | Status of metadata record within the system, i.e., in-process, in-review, pre-pub-review, deprecate-request, deprecated or published. |
| published | Date of first broadcast / publication. |
| publisher | The organization credited with publishing or broadcasting the resource. |
| purpose | The purpose of the resource in the context of education; e.g., instruction, professional education, assessment. |
| rating | The aggregation of input from all user assessments evaluating users' reaction to the learning resource following Kirkpatrick's model of training evaluation. |
| ratings | Inputs from users assessing each user's reaction to the learning resource following Kirkpatrick's model of training evaluation. |
| resource_modification_date | Date in which the resource has last been modified from the original published or broadcast version. |
| status | System generated publication status of the resource w/in the registry as a yes for published or no for not published. |
| subject | Subject domain(s) toward which the resource is targeted. There may be more than one value for this field. |
| submitter_email | (excluded) Email address of |
Facebook
TwitterThe Best Management Practices Statistical Estimator (BMPSE) version 1.2.0 was developed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Project Delivery and Environmental Review to provide planning-level information about the performance of structural best management practices for decision makers, planners, and highway engineers to assess and mitigate possible adverse effects of highway and urban runoff on the Nation's receiving waters (Granato 2013, 2014; Granato and others, 2021). The BMPSE was assembled by using a Microsoft Access® database application to facilitate calculation of BMP performance statistics. Granato (2014) developed quantitative methods to estimate values of the trapezoidal-distribution statistics, correlation coefficients, and the minimum irreducible concentration (MIC) from available data. Granato (2014) developed the BMPSE to hold and process data from the International Stormwater Best Management Practices Database (BMPDB, www.bmpdatabase.org). Version 1.0 of the BMPSE contained a subset of the data from the 2012 version of the BMPDB; the current version of the BMPSE (1.2.0) contains a subset of the data from the December 2019 version of the BMPDB. Selected data from the BMPDB were screened for import into the BMPSE in consultation with Jane Clary, the data manager for the BMPDB. Modifications included identifying water quality constituents, making measurement units consistent, identifying paired inflow and outflow values, and converting BMPDB water quality values set as half the detection limit back to the detection limit. Total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) values were added to the BMPSE from BMPDB data; they were calculated from individual PAH measurements at sites with enough data to calculate totals. The BMPSE tool can sort and rank the data, calculate plotting positions, calculate initial estimates, and calculate potential correlations to facilitate the distribution-fitting process (Granato, 2014). For water-quality ratio analysis the BMPSE generates the input files and the list of filenames for each constituent within the Graphical User Interface (GUI). The BMPSE calculates the Spearman’s rho (ρ) and Kendall’s tau (τ) correlation coefficients with their respective 95-percent confidence limits and the probability that each correlation coefficient value is not significantly different from zero by using standard methods (Granato, 2014). If the 95-percent confidence limit values are of the same sign, then the correlation coefficient is statistically different from zero. For hydrograph extension, the BMPSE calculates ρ and τ between the inflow volume and the hydrograph-extension values (Granato, 2014). For volume reduction, the BMPSE calculates ρ and τ between the inflow volume and the ratio of outflow to inflow volumes (Granato, 2014). For water-quality treatment, the BMPSE calculates ρ and τ between the inflow concentrations and the ratio of outflow to inflow concentrations (Granato, 2014; 2020). The BMPSE also calculates ρ between the inflow and the outflow concentrations when a water-quality treatment analysis is done. The current version (1.2.0) of the BMPSE also has the option to calculate urban-runoff quality statistics from inflows to BMPs by using computer code developed for the Highway Runoff Database (Granato and Cazenas, 2009;Granato, 2019). Granato, G.E., 2013, Stochastic empirical loading and dilution model (SELDM) version 1.0.0: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 4, chap. C3, 112 p., CD-ROM https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/04/c03 Granato, G.E., 2014, Statistics for stochastic modeling of volume reduction, hydrograph extension, and water-quality treatment by structural stormwater runoff best management practices (BMPs): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5037, 37 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20145037. Granato, G.E., 2019, Highway-Runoff Database (HRDB) Version 1.1.0: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P94VL32J. Granato, G.E., and Cazenas, P.A., 2009, Highway-Runoff Database (HRDB Version 1.0)--A data warehouse and preprocessor for the stochastic empirical loading and dilution model: Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, FHWA-HEP-09-004, 57 p. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5269/disc_content_100a_web/FHWA-HEP-09-004.pdf Granato, G.E., Spaetzel, A.B., and Medalie, L., 2021, Statistical methods for simulating structural stormwater runoff best management practices (BMPs) with the stochastic empirical loading and dilution model (SELDM): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2020–5136, 41 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20205136
Facebook
TwitterFinancial overview and grant giving statistics of Data Management Association International Kansas City Chapter
Facebook
TwitterThe statistic shows the share of data management components that are run in the cloud worldwide, as of October 2016. According to the survey, ** percent of respondents indicated that their data warehouses were running in the cloud.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Facebook
TwitterFinancial overview and grant giving statistics of Data Management Association Puget Sound
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.statsndata.org/how-to-orderhttps://www.statsndata.org/how-to-order
The Enterprise Data Management (EDM) Tools market plays a pivotal role in modern businesses, where data is a critical asset. These tools enable organizations to effectively manage, govern, and leverage their data assets across various departments and systems. This comprehensive approach to data management not only e
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.futuremarketinsights.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.futuremarketinsights.com/privacy-policy
The global dynamic data management system market is likely to be valued at US$ 33,960.7 million in 2023. From 2023 to 2033, the market for dynamic data management system is likely to expand at a CAGR of 10.6% to reach US$ 1,24,745.1 million by 2033.
| Data Points | Key Statistics |
|---|---|
| Global Dynamic Data Management System Market CAGR (2023 to 2033) | 10.6% |
| Anticipated Market Value (2023) | US$ 33,960.7 million |
| Global Dynamic Data Management System Market (2033) | US$ 1,24,754.1 million |
Report Scope
| Report Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| Market Value in 2023 | US$ 33,960.7 million |
| Market Value in 2033 | US$ 1,24,745.1 million |
| Growth Rate | CAGR of 10.6% from 2023 to 2033 |
| Base Year for Estimation | 2022 |
| Historical Data | 2018 to 2022 |
| Forecast Period | 2023 to 2033 |
| Quantitative Units | Revenue in US$ million and CAGR from 2023 to 2033 |
| Report Coverage | Revenue Forecast, Volume Forecast, Company Ranking, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, Trends and Pricing Analysis |
| Segments Covered |
|
| Regions Covered |
|
| Key Countries Profiled |
|
| Key Companies Profiled |
|
| Report Customization & Pricing | Available Upon Request |
Facebook
TwitterDuring a survey on customer experience (CX) among businesses conducted in the United States in 2019, participants were asked how their organizations cope with increasing data volume originating from digital channels. One in *** respondents answered that their organization has a dedicated business analytics team in charge of interpreting data. Moreover, approximately ** percent of the respondents said that thier company has an automated technology system in place for this purpose.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.statsndata.org/how-to-orderhttps://www.statsndata.org/how-to-order
The Cognitive Data Management market has emerged as a transformative force in the realm of data analytics, revolutionizing how organizations handle, store, and interpret their data. At its core, cognitive data management leverages advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and natu
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.statsndata.org/how-to-orderhttps://www.statsndata.org/how-to-order
The Data Management Technology Application Software market has emerged as a crucial component in today's data-driven landscape, where organizations grapple with the exponential growth of data. This software aids businesses in effectively storing, managing, and analyzing their vast datasets, thereby empowering them t
Facebook
TwitterFinancial overview and grant giving statistics of Data Management Association International - Rocky Mountain Cha
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.consegicbusinessintelligence.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.consegicbusinessintelligence.com/privacy-policy
The global clinical data management systems market size was valued at USD 1,837.50 million in 2023 and it is expected to grow to USD 4,490.53 million by 2031 at a CAGR of 13.6%.
Facebook
TwitterFinancial overview and grant giving statistics of Data Management Association of New England Inc.
Facebook
TwitterFinancial overview and grant giving statistics of Data Management Association International-Midsouth Chapter Inc.
Facebook
TwitterIn a 2024 survey, over half of the respondents stated that their desired data management benefit on Kubernetes was high availability and disaster recovery for critical Kubernetes applications. Moreover, **** of the organizations would benefit from unified platform for containers and VMs.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.statsndata.org/how-to-orderhttps://www.statsndata.org/how-to-order
The Product Data Management (PDM) Software market has emerged as a critical component in modern enterprises, facilitating the efficient management of product-related data throughout the entire lifecycle. This software suite serves industries ranging from manufacturing to retail, allowing organizations to create, sto
Facebook
TwitterLearning Goals: • explain importance of data management • identify elements of an organized data sheet • create & manipulate data in a spreadsheet • calculate vital statistics using life tables • collect, manage and analyze data to test hypotheses
Facebook
TwitterIn 2020, most enterprises according to respondents have multiple tools or applications to perform various data management functions. Of the functions, back up/recovery and data classification were the approaches used most frequently with multiple apps, according to ** percent of respondents for both.