Investigator(s): United Nations Office at Vienna, R.W. Burnham, Helen Burnham, Bruce DiCristina, and Graeme Newman The United Nations Surveys of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems (formerly known as the United Nations World Crime Surveys) series was begun in 1978 and is comprised of five quinquennial surveys covering the years 1970-1975, 1975-1980, 1980-1986, 1986-1990, and 1990-1994. The project was supported by the United States Bureau of Justice Statistics, and conducted under the auspices of the United Nations Criminal Justice and Crime Prevention Branch, United Nations Office in Vienna. Data gathered on crime prevention and criminal justice among member nations provide information for policy development and program planning. The main objectives of the survey include: to conduct a more focused inquiry into the incidence of crime worldwide, to improve knowledge about the incidence of reported crime in the global development perspective and also international understanding of effective ways to counteract crime, to improve the dissemination globally of the information collected, to facilitate an overview of trends and interrelationships among various parts of the criminal justice system so as to promote informed decision-making in its administration, nationally and cross-nationally, and to serve as an instrument for strengthening cooperation among member states by putting the review and analysis of national crime-related data in a broader context. The surveys also provide a valuable source of charting trends in crime and criminal justice over two decades.

Complete data set from the Washington State Criminal Justice Data Book. Combines state data from multiple agency sources that can be queried through CrimeStats Online.

Data from across the government on responses to and outcomes of domestic abuse cases in the criminal justice system.

Investigator(s): Bureau of Justice Statistics These data collections present public expenditure and employment data pertaining to criminal justice activities in the United States. The data were collected by the U.S. Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Information on employment, payroll, and expenditures is provided for police, courts, prosecutors' offices, and corrections agencies. Specific variables include identification of each government, number of full- and part-time employees, level of full- and part-time payroll, current expenditures, capital outlay, and intergovernmental expenditures. Years Produced: Annually Related Data Longitudinal File (ICPSR 7636, ICPSR 7618) Individual Units File and Estimates File (ICPSR 9446, ICPSR 8650)

In 2023, Singapore had the highest criminal justice index score across the Asia-Pacific region, with 0.77 points out of one. In contrast, Afghanistan and Myanmar had the lowest criminal justice index scores in the Asia-Pacific region, scoring 0.25 points each in 2023.

In 2024, India's index for criminal justice, one of the factors in the rule of law index was 0.38. According to the source, this measures if criminal processes are effective, from investigations to adjudication timeliness, reducing criminal behavior are impartial, free of corruption, and follow due process of the law and rights of the accused. That year, India's ranking in the Rule of Law index stood at 79 out of 142 countries, a significant increase compared to 2015.

The Department of Justice Canada created the first performance monitoring framework (“the Framework”) for Canada’s criminal justice system in 2019. The Framework identified broad expected outcomes, measured by key indicators. The State of the Criminal Justice System Dashboard presents information from the Framework in one easily accessible location. The Dashboard shows information and data collected for over 40 performance indicators grouped by nine outcomes. This information is presented for the total population and by population-based theme. The population-based themes currently available are: Indigenous Peoples and Women. These themes present pre-filtered views of the data by sub-population, such as by Indigenous identity or sex/gender (where data are available). Under each theme, data users can also find contextual information on how different populations interact with the criminal justice system as victims, survivors, accused and offenders. The State of the Criminal Justice System Dashboard will be updated regularly as more data and information become available.

Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) estimates, by each combination of offence group, age, sex, and important demographic or household characteristics.

The reports presents the main trends on the latest 12 months of activity in the criminal justice system (CJS) for England and Wales. For each process a brief description of the function is included with an explanation of some of the main procedures involved.

In 2024, the Philippines had a criminal justice index score of 0.31 out of one. Among the different factors, the absence of corruption had the highest score of 0.45 out of one. On the other hand, effective correctional system had a score of 0.21 out of one. Overall, the country ranked 13th out of the 15 countries in the Asia Pacific region in terms of criminal justice.

The Department of Justice has the responsibility to collect, analyze, and report statistical data, which provide valid measures of crime and the criminal justice process to government and the citizens of California. The site contains crime data submitted by county and local law enforcement agencies.

This dataset contains official statistics on criminal justice globally, disaggregated at the national and regional levels. Some of the series included in the dataset also contain sex and age disaggregated data (SADD). Included in the dataset are statistics on formal contact, persons prosecuted, persons convicted, persons detained, criminal justice system resources.

This dataset contains official statistics on criminal justice globally, disaggregated at the national and regional levels. Some of the series included in the dataset also contain sex and age disaggregated data (SADD). Included in the dataset are statistics on formal contact, persons prosecuted, persons convicted, persons detained, criminal justice system resources.

The United Nations office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) provides statistical data on criminal justice on a regular basis. The data is provided as Excel sheets, which can be downloaded from the website. If you want to browse the data, please use the links in the "navigation box" on the left side. Furthermore, it is possible to create your own SPARQL queries for obtaining lists of combined information. This dataset (http://unodc.publicdata.eu/) was triplified and published by the research group AKSW (Agile Knowledge Engineering and Semantic Web). For further information about AKSW please visit our website.

The Washington SAC provides access to crime statistics through several methods; CrimeStats Online, the Uniform Crime Report (UCR), and the National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS). Queries are web-based interfaces that allow users to query Washington crime data online. For more detailed analyses, the UCR and NIBRS data are available in Excel spreadsheets and SAS datasets. County-level summaries from the Criminal Justice Data Book are available in Excel as well.

Access to the Washington State Criminal Justice Data Book. For additional information about the data available and an online query system, click https://sac.ofm.wa.gov/data

Quarterly national statistics release on the Criminal Justice System at national level, England and Wales. Source agency: Justice Designation: National Statistics Language: English Alternative title: Criminal Justice System statistics quarterly

These criminal justice expenditure and employment (CJEE) data are taken from a special compilation of sources available from the Census Bureau's Annual Surveys of Governments, Finance Statistics and Employment Statistics. Levels of government covered are federal, state, county, municipal, and towns and townships. Information is included on total employment, total police protection, police protection with arrest powers, other police protection, judicial-legal employment, corrections employment, total expenditures, police protection expenditures, judicial-legal expenditures, and corrections expenditures. Types of expenditures include direct current, capital outlay, equipment, and intergovernmental. Types of employment include total, full-time, part-time, and full-time equivalent.