The statistic displays the most popular SQL databases used by software developers worldwide, as of April 2015. According to the survey, 64 percent of software developers were using MySQL, an open-source relational database management system (RDBMS).
As of June 2024, the most popular database management system (DBMS) worldwide was Oracle, with a ranking score of 1244.08; MySQL and Microsoft SQL server rounded out the top three. Although the database management industry contains some of the largest companies in the tech industry, such as Microsoft, Oracle and IBM, a number of free and open-source DBMSs such as PostgreSQL and MariaDB remain competitive. Database Management Systems As the name implies, DBMSs provide a platform through which developers can organize, update, and control large databases. Given the business world’s growing focus on big data and data analytics, knowledge of SQL programming languages has become an important asset for software developers around the world, and database management skills are seen as highly desirable. In addition to providing developers with the tools needed to operate databases, DBMS are also integral to the way that consumers access information through applications, which further illustrates the importance of the software.
https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.futuremarketinsights.com/privacy-policy
The worldwide SQL server transformation market is anticipated to surge at an impressive CAGR of 10.1% from 2022 to 2029. At present, industry revenue stands at US$ 15.5 Billion, which is expected to rise to US$ 30.4 billion by the end of 2029.
Report Attributes | Details |
---|---|
SQL Server Transformation Market Size (2022) | US$ 15.5 Billion |
Estimated Net Worth (2029) | US$ 30.4 Billion |
Predicted Growth Rate (2022 to 2029) | 10.1% CAGR |
Largest Function Segment | Data Integration Scripts - 35.9% |
How The Market Progressed Till June 2022?
Market Statistics | Details |
---|---|
H1,2021 (A) | 8.3% |
H1,2022 Projected (P) | 8.9% |
H1,2022 Outlook (O) | 8.5% |
BPS Change : H1,2022 (O) - H1,2022 (P) | (-) 40 ↓ |
BPS Change : H1,2022 (O) - H1,2021 (A) | (+) 20 ↑ |
SQL Server Transformation Industry Report Scope
Attribute | Details |
---|---|
Forecast Period | 2022 to 2029 |
Historical Data Available for | 2014 to 2021 |
Market Analysis | US$ Million for Value |
Key Regions Covered |
|
Key Countries Covered |
|
Key Market Segments Covered |
|
Key Companies Profiled |
|
Pricing | Available upon Request |
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The global SQL Query Builders market size was valued at USD XXX million in 2025 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of XX% during the forecast period, 2025-2033, reaching USD XXX million in 2033. The market growth is attributed to the increasing adoption of cloud-based data platforms, the growing need for data analysis and visualization, and the rising demand for self-service BI tools. The cloud-based segment is expected to dominate the market due to its flexibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. The North America region accounted for the largest market share in 2025 and is expected to maintain its dominance during the forecast period. The high adoption of advanced technologies, presence of major vendors, and growing awareness about data-driven decision-making are the key factors driving the market growth in this region. The Asia Pacific region is expected to experience the fastest growth rate during the forecast period due to the increasing adoption of digital technologies and the growing number of small and medium-sized businesses in the region. Major vendors in the market include Chartio, Datapine, Syncfusion, Devart, Idera, Navicat, Toad, SQLyog, DbVisualizer, Skyvia, Aqua Data Studio, Valentina, IBExpert, EasyQueryBuilder, Active Database Software, DBHawk, Data Xtractor, and others.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Publicly accessible databases often impose query limits or require registration. Even when I maintain public and limit-free APIs, I never wanted to host a public database because I tend to think that the connection strings are a problem for the user.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This folder contains the Spider-Realistic dataset used for evaluation in the paper "Structure-Grounded Pretraining for Text-to-SQL". The dataset is created based on the dev split of the Spider dataset (2020-06-07 version from https://yale-lily.github.io/spider). We manually modified the original questions to remove the explicit mention of column names while keeping the SQL queries unchanged to better evaluate the model's capability in aligning the NL utterance and the DB schema. For more details, please check our paper at https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.12773.
It contains the following files:
- spider-realistic.json
# The spider-realistic evaluation set
# Examples: 508
# Databases: 19
- dev.json
# The original dev split of Spider
# Examples: 1034
# Databases: 20
- tables.json
# The original DB schemas from Spider
# Databases: 166
- README.txt
- license
The Spider-Realistic dataset is created based on the dev split of the Spider dataset realsed by Yu, Tao, et al. "Spider: A large-scale human-labeled dataset for complex and cross-domain semantic parsing and text-to-sql task." It is a subset of the original dataset with explicit mention of the column names removed. The sql queries and databases are kept unchanged.
For the format of each json file, please refer to the github page of Spider https://github.com/taoyds/spider.
For the database files please refer to the official Spider release https://yale-lily.github.io/spider.
This dataset is distributed under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
If you use the dataset, please cite the following papers including the original Spider datasets, Finegan-Dollak et al., 2018 and the original datasets for Restaurants, GeoQuery, Scholar, Academic, IMDB, and Yelp.
@article{deng2020structure,
title={Structure-Grounded Pretraining for Text-to-SQL},
author={Deng, Xiang and Awadallah, Ahmed Hassan and Meek, Christopher and Polozov, Oleksandr and Sun, Huan and Richardson, Matthew},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.12773},
year={2020}
}
@inproceedings{Yu&al.18c,
year = 2018,
title = {Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task},
booktitle = {EMNLP},
author = {Tao Yu and Rui Zhang and Kai Yang and Michihiro Yasunaga and Dongxu Wang and Zifan Li and James Ma and Irene Li and Qingning Yao and Shanelle Roman and Zilin Zhang and Dragomir Radev }
}
@InProceedings{P18-1033,
author = "Finegan-Dollak, Catherine
and Kummerfeld, Jonathan K.
and Zhang, Li
and Ramanathan, Karthik
and Sadasivam, Sesh
and Zhang, Rui
and Radev, Dragomir",
title = "Improving Text-to-SQL Evaluation Methodology",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
year = "2018",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
pages = "351--360",
location = "Melbourne, Australia",
url = "http://aclweb.org/anthology/P18-1033"
}
@InProceedings{data-sql-imdb-yelp,
dataset = {IMDB and Yelp},
author = {Navid Yaghmazadeh, Yuepeng Wang, Isil Dillig, and Thomas Dillig},
title = {SQLizer: Query Synthesis from Natural Language},
booktitle = {International Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, ACM},
month = {October},
year = {2017},
pages = {63:1--63:26},
url = {http://doi.org/10.1145/3133887},
}
@article{data-academic,
dataset = {Academic},
author = {Fei Li and H. V. Jagadish},
title = {Constructing an Interactive Natural Language Interface for Relational Databases},
journal = {Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
month = {September},
year = {2014},
pages = {73--84},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.14778/2735461.2735468},
}
@InProceedings{data-atis-geography-scholar,
dataset = {Scholar, and Updated ATIS and Geography},
author = {Srinivasan Iyer, Ioannis Konstas, Alvin Cheung, Jayant Krishnamurthy, and Luke Zettlemoyer},
title = {Learning a Neural Semantic Parser from User Feedback},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)},
year = {2017},
pages = {963--973},
location = {Vancouver, Canada},
url = {http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P17-1089},
}
@inproceedings{data-geography-original
dataset = {Geography, original},
author = {John M. Zelle and Raymond J. Mooney},
title = {Learning to Parse Database Queries Using Inductive Logic Programming},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2},
year = {1996},
pages = {1050--1055},
location = {Portland, Oregon},
url = {http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1864519.1864543},
}
@inproceedings{data-restaurants-logic,
author = {Lappoon R. Tang and Raymond J. Mooney},
title = {Automated Construction of Database Interfaces: Intergrating Statistical and Relational Learning for Semantic Parsing},
booktitle = {2000 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora},
year = {2000},
pages = {133--141},
location = {Hong Kong, China},
url = {http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W00-1317},
}
@inproceedings{data-restaurants-original,
author = {Ana-Maria Popescu, Oren Etzioni, and Henry Kautz},
title = {Towards a Theory of Natural Language Interfaces to Databases},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces},
year = {2003},
location = {Miami, Florida, USA},
pages = {149--157},
url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/604045.604070},
}
@inproceedings{data-restaurants,
author = {Alessandra Giordani and Alessandro Moschitti},
title = {Automatic Generation and Reranking of SQL-derived Answers to NL Questions},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Trustworthy Eternal Systems via Evolving Software, Data and Knowledge},
year = {2012},
location = {Montpellier, France},
pages = {59--76},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45260-4_5},
}
These files contain SET monitoring data collected at Assateague Island National Seashore
The global database management system (DBMS) market revenue grew to 80 billion U.S. dollars in 2020. Cloud DBMS accounted for the majority of the overall market growth, as database systems are migrating to cloud platforms.
Database market
The database market consists of paid database software such as Oracle and Microsoft SQL Server, as well as free, open-source software options like PostgreSQL and MongolDB. Database Management Systems (DBMSs) provide a platform through which developers can organize, update, and control large databases, with products like Oracle, MySQL, and Microsoft SQL Server being the most widely used in the market.
Database management software
Knowledge of the programming languages related to these databases is becoming an increasingly important asset for software developers around the world, and database management skills such as MongoDB and Elasticsearch are seen as highly desirable. In addition to providing developers with the tools needed to operate databases, DBMS are also integral to the way that consumers access information through applications, which further illustrates the importance of the software.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Introduction
This datasets have SQL injection attacks (SLQIA) as malicious Netflow data. The attacks carried out are SQL injection for Union Query and Blind SQL injection. To perform the attacks, the SQLMAP tool has been used.
NetFlow traffic has generated using DOROTHEA (DOcker-based fRamework fOr gaTHering nEtflow trAffic). NetFlow is a network protocol developed by Cisco for the collection and monitoring of network traffic flow data generated. A flow is defined as a unidirectional sequence of packets with some common properties that pass through a network device.
Datasets
The firts dataset was colleted to train the detection models (D1) and other collected using different attacks than those used in training to test the models and ensure their generalization (D2).
The datasets contain both benign and malicious traffic. All collected datasets are balanced.
The version of NetFlow used to build the datasets is 5.
Dataset
Aim
Samples
Benign-malicious
traffic ratio
D1
Training
400,003
50%
D2
Test
57,239
50%
Infrastructure and implementation
Two sets of flow data were collected with DOROTHEA. DOROTHEA is a Docker-based framework for NetFlow data collection. It allows you to build interconnected virtual networks to generate and collect flow data using the NetFlow protocol. In DOROTHEA, network traffic packets are sent to a NetFlow generator that has a sensor ipt_netflow installed. The sensor consists of a module for the Linux kernel using Iptables, which processes the packets and converts them to NetFlow flows.
DOROTHEA is configured to use Netflow V5 and export the flow after it is inactive for 15 seconds or after the flow is active for 1800 seconds (30 minutes)
Benign traffic generation nodes simulate network traffic generated by real users, performing tasks such as searching in web browsers, sending emails, or establishing Secure Shell (SSH) connections. Such tasks run as Python scripts. Users may customize them or even incorporate their own. The network traffic is managed by a gateway that performs two main tasks. On the one hand, it routes packets to the Internet. On the other hand, it sends it to a NetFlow data generation node (this process is carried out similarly to packets received from the Internet).
The malicious traffic collected (SQLI attacks) was performed using SQLMAP. SQLMAP is a penetration tool used to automate the process of detecting and exploiting SQL injection vulnerabilities.
The attacks were executed on 16 nodes and launch SQLMAP with the parameters of the following table.
Parameters
Description
'--banner','--current-user','--current-db','--hostname','--is-dba','--users','--passwords','--privileges','--roles','--dbs','--tables','--columns','--schema','--count','--dump','--comments', --schema'
Enumerate users, password hashes, privileges, roles, databases, tables and columns
--level=5
Increase the probability of a false positive identification
--risk=3
Increase the probability of extracting data
--random-agent
Select the User-Agent randomly
--batch
Never ask for user input, use the default behavior
--answers="follow=Y"
Predefined answers to yes
Every node executed SQLIA on 200 victim nodes. The victim nodes had deployed a web form vulnerable to Union-type injection attacks, which was connected to the MYSQL or SQLServer database engines (50% of the victim nodes deployed MySQL and the other 50% deployed SQLServer).
The web service was accessible from ports 443 and 80, which are the ports typically used to deploy web services. The IP address space was 182.168.1.1/24 for the benign and malicious traffic-generating nodes. For victim nodes, the address space was 126.52.30.0/24. The malicious traffic in the test sets was collected under different conditions. For D1, SQLIA was performed using Union attacks on the MySQL and SQLServer databases.
However, for D2, BlindSQL SQLIAs were performed against the web form connected to a PostgreSQL database. The IP address spaces of the networks were also different from those of D1. In D2, the IP address space was 152.148.48.1/24 for benign and malicious traffic generating nodes and 140.30.20.1/24 for victim nodes.
To run the MySQL server we ran MariaDB version 10.4.12. Microsoft SQL Server 2017 Express and PostgreSQL version 13 were used.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
High performance SQL server is a book series. It includes 5 books, written by 5 different authors.
These files contain SET monitoring data collected at NCBN parks.
These files contain SET monitoring data collected at Cape Cod National Seashore
Abstract— The present study deals with Transparent Data Encryption which is a technology used to solve the problems of security of data. Transparent Data Encryption means encryptingdatabases on hard disk and on any backup media. Present day global business environment presents numerous security threats and compliance challenges. To protect against data thefts andfrauds we require security solutions that are transparent by design. Transparent Data Encryption provides transparent, standards-based security that protects data on the network, on disk and on backup media. It is easy and effective protection ofstored data by transparently encrypting data. Transparent Data Encryption can be used to provide high levels of security to columns, table and tablespace that is database files stored onhard drives or floppy disks or CD’s, and other information that requires protection. It is the technology used by Microsoft SQL Server 2008 to encrypt database contents. The term encryptionmeans the piece of information encoded in such a way that it can only be decoded read and understood by people for whom the information is intended. The study deals with ways to createMaster Key, creation of certificate protected by the master key, creation of database master key and protection by the certificate and ways to set the database to use encryption in Microsoft SQLServer 2008.
The State Contract and Procurement Registration System (SCPRS) was established in 2003, as a centralized database of information on State contracts and purchases over $5000. eSCPRS represents the data captured in the State's eProcurement (eP) system, Bidsync, as of March 16, 2009. The data provided is an extract from that system for fiscal years 2012-2013, 2013-2014, and 2014-2015
Data Limitations:
Some purchase orders have multiple UNSPSC numbers, however only first was used to identify the purchase order. Multiple UNSPSC numbers were included to provide additional data for a DGS special event however this affects the formatting of the file. The source system Bidsync is being deprecated and these issues will be resolved in the future as state systems transition to Fi$cal.
Data Collection Methodology:
The data collection process starts with a data file from eSCPRS that is scrubbed and standardized prior to being uploaded into a SQL Server database. There are four primary tables. The Supplier, Department and United Nations Standard Products and Services Code (UNSPSC) tables are reference tables. The Supplier and Department tables are updated and mapped to the appropriate numbering schema and naming conventions. The UNSPSC table is used to categorize line item information and requires no further manipulation. The Purchase Order table contains raw data that requires conversion to the correct data format and mapping to the corresponding data fields. A stacking method is applied to the table to eliminate blanks where needed. Extraneous characters are removed from fields. The four tables are joined together and queries are executed to update the final Purchase Order Dataset table. Once the scrubbing and standardization process is complete the data is then uploaded into the SQL Server database.
Secondary/Related Resources:
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Microsoft SQL server 2005 compact edition is a book. It was written by Prashant Dhingra and published by Sams Pub in 2007.
analyze the current population survey (cps) annual social and economic supplement (asec) with r the annual march cps-asec has been supplying the statistics for the census bureau's report on income, poverty, and health insurance coverage since 1948. wow. the us census bureau and the bureau of labor statistics ( bls) tag-team on this one. until the american community survey (acs) hit the scene in the early aughts (2000s), the current population survey had the largest sample size of all the annual general demographic data sets outside of the decennial census - about two hundred thousand respondents. this provides enough sample to conduct state- and a few large metro area-level analyses. your sample size will vanish if you start investigating subgroups b y state - consider pooling multiple years. county-level is a no-no. despite the american community survey's larger size, the cps-asec contains many more variables related to employment, sources of income, and insurance - and can be trended back to harry truman's presidency. aside from questions specifically asked about an annual experience (like income), many of the questions in this march data set should be t reated as point-in-time statistics. cps-asec generalizes to the united states non-institutional, non-active duty military population. the national bureau of economic research (nber) provides sas, spss, and stata importation scripts to create a rectangular file (rectangular data means only person-level records; household- and family-level information gets attached to each person). to import these files into r, the parse.SAScii function uses nber's sas code to determine how to import the fixed-width file, then RSQLite to put everything into a schnazzy database. you can try reading through the nber march 2012 sas importation code yourself, but it's a bit of a proc freak show. this new github repository contains three scripts: 2005-2012 asec - download all microdata.R down load the fixed-width file containing household, family, and person records import by separating this file into three tables, then merge 'em together at the person-level download the fixed-width file containing the person-level replicate weights merge the rectangular person-level file with the replicate weights, then store it in a sql database create a new variable - one - in the data table 2012 asec - analysis examples.R connect to the sql database created by the 'download all microdata' progr am create the complex sample survey object, using the replicate weights perform a boatload of analysis examples replicate census estimates - 2011.R connect to the sql database created by the 'download all microdata' program create the complex sample survey object, using the replicate weights match the sas output shown in the png file below 2011 asec replicate weight sas output.png statistic and standard error generated from the replicate-weighted example sas script contained in this census-provided person replicate weights usage instructions document. click here to view these three scripts for more detail about the current population survey - annual social and economic supplement (cps-asec), visit: the census bureau's current population survey page the bureau of labor statistics' current population survey page the current population survey's wikipedia article notes: interviews are conducted in march about experiences during the previous year. the file labeled 2012 includes information (income, work experience, health insurance) pertaining to 2011. when you use the current populat ion survey to talk about america, subract a year from the data file name. as of the 2010 file (the interview focusing on america during 2009), the cps-asec contains exciting new medical out-of-pocket spending variables most useful for supplemental (medical spending-adjusted) poverty research. confidential to sas, spss, stata, sudaan users: why are you still rubbing two sticks together after we've invented the butane lighter? time to transition to r. :D
SQL Injection is the main source of web application critical vulnerabilities found globally in 2023, with 23 percent, in addition to 19 percent of internet facing critical vulnerabilities due to cross site scripting (stored) attacks.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The appendix of our ICSE 2018 paper "Search-Based Test Data Generation for SQL Queries: Appendix".
The appendix contains:
As of December 2022, relational database management systems (RDBMS) were the most popular type of DBMS, accounting for a 72 percent popularity share. The most popular RDBMS in the world has been reported as Oracle, while MySQL and Microsoft SQL server rounded out the top three.
https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.zionmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
Global In-memory database market is expected to revenue of around USD 36.21 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 19.2% between 2024 and 2032.
The statistic displays the most popular SQL databases used by software developers worldwide, as of April 2015. According to the survey, 64 percent of software developers were using MySQL, an open-source relational database management system (RDBMS).