Introduction

Workplace Harassment Statistics: Workplace harassment remains a significant concern across industries, with research indicating that nearly 25% of employees have experienced some form of harassment during their careers. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) reports that over 70,000 harassment charges are filed annually, with sexual harassment being one of the most prevalent forms.

Despite increased awareness and legislative measures, many incidents go unreported, with up to 75% of victims choosing not to disclose their experiences. Harassment not only impacts the mental health and well-being of individuals but also poses serious financial consequences for organizations, with harassment-related lawsuits costing businesses billions each year. Understanding workplace harassment statistics is crucial for fostering a safer, more inclusive work environment.

In the second quarter of 2025, Facebook took action on 4.1 million pieces of bullying and harassment related content, down from 5.1 million in the previous quarter. Overall, the first quarter of 2022 saw the highest ever number of bullying and harassment related pieces of content removed by the platform. Between the first quarter of 2020 and the first quarter of 2021, the removal of bullying and harassment content increased significantly.

In 2020, female founders experienced significantly more sexist and sexual harassment in the workplace than male founders globally. For instance, there is a significant difference between the proportion of men and women who experienced harassment of a sexist or sexual nature with ************** of female founders reporting having experienced sexism in the workplace, while only ** percent of men reported having experienced this. Similarly, ** percent of women reported having experienced sexual harassment in the workplace, while this was the case for only ** percent of men. No male founders reported ever having experienced stalking, while ** percent of female founders in tech have experienced this.

Overall, a larger proportion of men experienced harassment in the form of physical assault, homophobia, physical abilities, and transphobia. For instance, homophobia was twice as prevalent for men when compared with their female counterparts. While only **** percent of women reported having experienced workplace harassment based on their religious affiliation, ** percent of men reportedly experienced this.

Introduction

Sexual Assault Statistics: ​Sexual assault remains a pervasive global issue, affecting individuals across all demographics. According to the World Health Organization, nearly 30% of women worldwide have been subjected to physical and/or sexual violence by an intimate partner or non-partner. UNICEF reports that over 370 million girls and women, approximately one in eight globally, experienced rape or sexual assault before the age of 18. When including non-contact forms of sexual violence, such as verbal abuse or online harassment, this figure rises to 650 million, or one in five.

Among boys and men, between 410 and 530 million, or around one in seven, experienced sexual violence during childhood. In the United States, 81% of women and 43% of men have reported experiencing some form of sexual harassment or assault in their lifetime.

These statistics underscore the widespread nature of sexual violence and highlight the urgent need for comprehensive prevention and support strategies to address and mitigate its impact globally.

Campus sexual harassment investigation statistics - statistics by the gender and age of the victims.

During a January 2021 survey it was found that 41 percent of internet users had personally experienced any kind of online harassment with 27 percent of respondents reporting to having experienced severe forms of online harassment such as physical threats, sexual harassment, stalking and sustained harassment. Furthermore, 77 percent of responding online harassment victims reported that they had been harassed on Facebook.

The main purpose of the EU survey on gender-based violence against women and other forms of inter-personal violence (EU-GBV) is to assess the prevalence of violence in order to address the requirements of the Istanbul Convention. The survey covers psychological, physical and sexual violence by intimate partner, physical and sexual violence by non-partner, sexual harassment at work, violence experienced in childhood and stalking by any perpetrator.

The data collection for the first wave (year 2021) was conducted in voluntary bases and took place between September 2020 and March 2024 in the EU countries, based on their national timetables. Eurostat coordinated data collection in 18 Member States (BE, BG, DK, EE, EL, ES, FR, HR, LV, LT, MT, NL, AT, PL, PT, SI, SK, FI). Additionally, Italy agreed to share data from their national survey on violence against women, but the implementation of the survey was postponed from 2022 to 2024 due to administrative difficulties. The indicators disseminated for Italy are based on the last national survey conducted in 2014, given that the prevalence of gender-based violence is not expected to differ significantly over time, specifically for prevalence of lifetime violence, and the indicators will be updated when 2024 survey results will be available. Moreover, indicators on sexual harassment at work disseminated for Italy are based on the national victimisation survey of 2022-2023. To cover the full EU, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) and the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) launched a joint data collection in the eight Member States not covered by Eurostat (CZ, DE, IE, CY, LU, HU, RO, SE) following the EU-GBV manual. Accordingly, data disseminated for wave 2021 and estimated EU-average is based on a joint data collection by Eurostat, FRA and EIGE.

The disseminated indicators focus on violence by perpetrator, disaggregated by type of violence, by time of occurrence, by age and by personal characteristics of the respondent; and on frequency, severity, seriousness and reporting of the experienced violence.

However, it is necessary to point out that survey data might only be a close proxy to real prevalence as survey data depends on the willingness of the respondent to disclose any violence experienced. Therefore, to understand the prevalence of violence and disclosure rates by survey respondents, it is important to take into account the extent to which violence is tolerated in the wider community. For example, in cultures where people are ready to talk about their painful experiences, their answers may reflect more accurately their own experiences rather than community norms. To provide some background on country specific context, few indicators on commonness and awareness of support services are disseminated.

It is essential to avoid using sensitive terms that could cause anxiety or concern when introducing the survey. Accordingly, the general recommendation was that the survey name should be neutral when contacting the respondents. The aim was to avoid alerting any perpetrators of domestic violence to the nature of the survey or frightening off any victims of violence, in order to minimise non-response, as some respondents might be discouraged from taking part if the name of the survey included terms like ‘assault’, ‘sexual violence’, or ‘gender-based violence’.

Majority of countries have followed this recommendation and the title of the survey was translated as survey on health, safety or security and well-being or living conditions; quality of life or relationship survey. Only few countries (BG, SK) used gender-based violence in the title of the survey during data collection and explained that this decision was taken as no issue appeared during testing the survey using the word “violence”, or the word "violence" was used in order to avoid misunderstanding regarding the aim of the survey and to reduce non-response due to the fact that respondents were not aware of the real theme of the survey.

However, the pilot survey results indicate that respondents understood the rationale for the choice of neutral survey name once they had been given an explanation, and agreed that it was right. Due to the sensitivity of the topic, the participating countries were strongly encouraged to include experts on violence against women and/or gender-based violence as well as psychologists and psychotherapists in every step of the survey - from the preparation, through the field work to the data dissemination.

Majority of countries included experts on the topic in the project team: gender statisticians, gender-based violence or violence against women researchers, policy experts, psychologists, social workers, experts working on victim support or NGOs, experts on victimization surveys. External experts were included in the preparation of the survey, training of the interviewers and in order to provide support to the interviewers.

Few countries (MT, FI) established the focus group or expert group consisting of different experts in the field and providing the support to the survey during all phases.

Context

This dataset contains Rape (with types), Stalking, Dowry Dataset 2001-21 of Bangladesh.

Project / Tasks

• Analysis and predict future rapes.
• Find rape patterns.

https://hraps.humboldt.edu/sites/default/files/styles/panopoly_image_full/public/harassment.jpg" alt="Woman Harassment">

About Rape

Rape is often described as unwanted or forced 'sex' – or 'sex' that happened without consent. But, sex can only happen when everyone consents. Rape, on the other hand, is a form of sexual violence and a serious crime. Rape happens when someone didn't want to have sex or didn't give their consent for sex to happen.

About Woman Harassment in Bangladesh

Despite lots of laws and campaign, people's perceptions on sexual harassment are still wrong in our country and a huge part of our total population is ignorant of its laws, leading to an increase in gender based violence. About 84% of women in Bangladesh are constantly being sexually harassed on the road, in vehicles, in educational institutions, at work, and even at home. In this context and the occasion of 'Sexual Harassment Awareness Month' - ACTIONISTS organized its 17th episode of the "Dialogue for Action" series on 29th April, 2021. The topic of this webinar was "Prevention of Sexual Harassment in Bangladesh: Socio-legal Perspectives". The invited speakers were respectively SK Jenefa K Jabbar, Director of Human Rights and Legal Aid Services (HRLS), Social Compliance and Safeguarding at BRAC; Taslima Yasmin, Associate Professor at Department of Law, University of Dhaka and Najmul Islam, ADC of Cyber Crime Investigation Division, CTTC, DMP. The program was hosted by Mohammad Golam Sarwar, Assistant Professor of Law, University of Dhaka and Coordinated by A.N.M. Fakhrul Amin Forhad, Founder of ACTIONISTS. Article URL

Content

• Attempt-to-Rape_2014-2021.csv
• Dowry_2001-2021.csv
• Rape_CommittedSuicideAfterBeingRaped_2007-2021.csv
• Rape_GangRape_2007-2021.csv
• Rape_KilledAfterRape_2007-2021.csv
• Rape_Total_2001-2021.csv
• Stalking_2011-2021.csv

Bangladesh related more Datasets

• 🏭 Export Processing Zones 🏤 Investment Data

Download

• kaggle API Command !kaggle datasets download -d azminetoushikwasi/woman-harassment-dataset-200121-bangladesh

Disclaimer

• The data collected are all publicly available and it's intended for educational purposes only.

Acknowledgement

• Cover image taken from internet.

Appreciate, Support, Share

Campus sexual harassment investigation is true statistics-statistics by the relationship of parties involved.

Abstract

Sexual harassment on a woman’s commute is pervasive and widens the gender wage gap. To capture the economic costs of this violence, we randomize the price of a women-reserved "safe space" in Rio de Janeiro. We recruit 363 women riders to crowdsource information on their behavior and experience across 22,000 rides. Women riding in the public space experience harassment once a week. A fifth of riders are willing to forgo the equivalent of a 20% fare subsidy to ride in the "safe space". Randomly assigning riders to the "safe space" reduces the incidence of physical harassment by 50%, implying a cost of avoiding physical harassment of $1.45 per incident. While the reserved space is safer in relative terms, Implicit Association Tests reveal that commuters associate women riding in the public space with more openness to sexual advances. The welfare implications of creating women-reserved spaces are ambiguous.

Geographic coverage

Rio de Janeiro Metropolitan Area

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Mode of data collection

Other [oth]

Provide statistical information on sexual harassment incidents and penalties in Taipei City every six months

1. Scope and Object: All business items implemented in accordance with the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act are within the scope and object of the statistics.2. Standard Time for Statistics: The first quarter refers to January to March, the second quarter refers to April to June, the third quarter refers to July to September, and the fourth quarter refers to October to December.3. Classification Standards: Horizontal items are classified according to "complaint investigation results", "re-complaint investigation results", and "mediation results"; vertical items are classified according to "behavior patterns", "relationship between the two parties", and "location of the incident".4. For detailed information and descriptions, please refer to the "Taichung City Official Statistics Network Information - Query of Official Statistics Plans of Various Agencies".

During a January 2021 survey, it was found that ** percent of online harassment victims in the United States had been cyber bullied via Facebook. Twitter and Instagram ranked second with ** percent of responding victims stating that they had been harassed on each platform.

The most targeted age groups in online harassment Among adults, those aged between 18 and 29 years old are the most targeted group in cyber bullying. As of September 2020, more than ** percent of U.S. adults who use the internet reported having experienced some form of online harassment. Almost two-thirds of them were between 18 and 29 years old. More than ** percent of the respondents of that age group had experienced offensive name-calling online. According to the survey of U.S. adults, the next most targeted group in cyber bullying are people between 30-49 years old.

Reasons for online hate

There are various reasons why people bully others in the online environment. The most common one in the United States is political views. In 2020, ** percent of U.S. internet users who had experienced online hate and harassment said their political views were the reason. Physical appearance was among the most common reasons for online hate, ** percent of the time. Among other reasons were race and ethnicity, gender, religion, and occupation.

Who experiences harassment more often?

Among U.S. internet users, men tend to experience online harassment more than women. A survey from September 2020 showed that ** percent of male respondents had experienced some form of online harassment, whereas ** percent of female respondents reported having experienced at least one kind of online harassment. However, women experienced three times as much online sexual harassment compared to men. Similarly, women also experienced stalking more than men.

During this 2017 survey, ** percent of surveyed women stated they have experienced sexual harassment, while ** percent of surveyed men stated the same. In total, about ** percent of American adults stated they have been sexually harassed before.

Increasing awareness in the U.S.

Sexual harassment is, of course, illegal but notoriously underreported. The discrepancy between perceived figures of cases and actual ones is severe, and in fact the actual number of cases of sexual harassment is at least twice as high as the average guesses, regardless of the country the survey was conducted in. However, in the United States, only a third of men and just as many women are really concerned about sexual harassment of women.

metoo sheds some light on dark figures

When the #metoo movement started in 2017, many women and men came forward and shared their experiences, and the number of reported cases of rape increased significantly. Public support for this movement is high in the United States, especially among the younger generations. Still, the United States have a long way to go, with harassment and discrimination based on gender and sexual harassment in the workplace still being a problem that needs to be addressed more thoroughly.

1. Statistical scope and objects: All business items carried out in accordance with the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act are within the statistical scope and objects.2. Statistical standard time: The first quarter refers to January to March, the second quarter refers to April to June, the third quarter refers to July to September, and the fourth quarter refers to October to December.3. Classification standard: Horizontally, it is classified according to "complaint investigation results," "re-complaint investigation results," and "mediation results"; vertically, it is classified according to "gender," "age group," "nationality group," "disability category," "educational level," and "occupation category."4. For detailed information and descriptions, please refer to the "Taichung City Government Statistics Website - Public Affairs Statistics Program Inquiry."

The Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) is a biennial (i.e., every other school year) survey required by the U.S. Department of Education’s (Department) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) since 1968. The CRDC collects a variety of information including student enrollment and educational programs and services, most of which is disaggregated by race/ethnicity, sex, limited English proficiency, and disability. The CRDC is a longstanding and important aspect of the ED Office for Civil Rights (OCR) overall strategy for administering and enforcing the civil rights statutes for which it is responsible. Data was reported directly from the school districts to the Office of Civil Rights. This data process is not managed by OSPI and therefore the data is not validated or reviewed by OSPI before being reported to OCR. For this reason data presented in this file will not mirror OSPI reports on similar student and school measures. The 2017-18 data in the report represents the most recent data made publicly available by the CRDC as of 5/10/2021. In some cases data was unavailable or suppressed by OCR to protect student privacy, for more information on this please visit the CRDC webpage. In addition, directory information for some schools is incomplete, as the names of the organizations provided in the CRDC data files did not match the names of organizations on record with OSPI. For additional information or questions about this data please visit the CRDC webpage at https://ocrdata.ed.gov/.

The study was designed to help increase the capacity of programs to prevent gender violence and harassment (GV/H) among middle school youth. The long-term goal of the study was to help prevent intimate partner violence, sexual violence, and sexual harassment by employing rigorous methods to evaluate strategies for altering violence-supportive attitudes and norms of youth. Specifically, the study was structured to evaluate the relative effectiveness of common approaches to youth GV/H prevention programming (in terms of knowledge, attitudes, intended behavior, behavior, and emotional safety of youth participants) for one of the youngest populations ever studied in this area. In a longitudinal randomized controlled trial study, two five-lesson curricula were created to address gender violence and harassment (GV/H) in middle schools, and classrooms were assigned randomly to treatment and control groups. Treatment 1 was an interaction-based curriculum focused on the setting and communication of boundaries in relationships, the determination of wanted and unwanted behaviors, and the role of the bystander as intervener. Treatment 2 was a law and justice curriculum focused on laws, definitions, information, and data about penalties for sexual assault and sexual harassment. The control group did not receive either treatment. Pencil-and-paper surveys were designed for students to complete, and were administered either by a member of the research team or by teachers who were trained by a member of the research team in proper administration processes. Data were collected from three inner-ring suburbs of Cleveland, Ohio, from November 2006 to May 2007. Surveys were distributed at three different times: immediately before the assignment to one of the three study conditions, immediately after the treatment (or control condition) was completed, and 5-6 months after their assignment to one of the three study conditions. The data contain responses for 1,507 students over 3 waves. Additionally, researchers used multiple imputations for this dataset which resulted in 5 imputed datasets for each record for a total of 7,535 cases in the data file. The data have 697 variables, including from such questions as whether someone had ever or in the past 6 months done something to the respondent such as slapped or scratched the respondent, hit the respondent, or threatened the respondent. Additionally, respondents were asked if they had done these same actions to someone else. Respondents were also asked a series of questions regarding whether they had ever been sexually harassed by someone or if they had sexually harassed someone themselves. Next, respondents were asked to rate whether they agreed with a series of statements such as "It is all right for a girl to ask a boy out on a date", "If you ignore sexual harassment, more than likely it will stop", and "Making sexual comments to a girl is wrong". Students were then asked to indicate whether a series of statements were true or false, such as "If two kids who are both under the age of 16 have sex, it is not against the law" and "If a person is not physically harming someone, then they are not really abusive". Respondents were then asked to read three scenarios and indicate how they would respond in that scenario. Also, students indicated how likely they would be to react in specified ways to a prepared statement. Data also provide demographic information such as age, gender, and ethnic/racial background, as well as variables to generically identify school district, school, and class period.

Explanation on the compilation of investigation results for sexual harassment complaints in Taichung City1. Scope and subjects of statistics: All business items executed in accordance with the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act are within the scope and subjects of statistics.2. Statistical standard time: The first quarter is from January to March, the second quarter is from April to June, the third quarter is from July to September, and the fourth quarter is from October to December.3. Classification standards: Classified according to "Investigation Results of Complaints", "Investigation Results of Re-complaints", "Mediation Results of Mediation Incidents" and "Transferred to Criminal Investigation".4. For detailed information and descriptions, please refer to the "Taichung City Civil Service Statistics Network Information Network - Query of Civil Service Statistics Programs of Various Agencies".

Records of complaints regarding unwelcome workplace conduct, filed in accordance with agency policies and procedures. Includes:rn- complaint, correspondence, notes, forms, and supporting materialrn- records of investigation, statements of witnessesrn- determination as to whether harassment occurredrn- documentation of preventive or corrective measures