The share of in-class content covered by remote learning materials at schools in the United Kingdom increased significantly between December 2020 and January 2021, rising from ** percent to ** percent in Primary schools, and from ** percent to ** percent at Secondary schools. This increase was due to schools generally closing their doors to regular attendance in early 2021, as the Coronavirus pandemic situation worsened in the UK.

Parent's responses to a survey investigating the main challenges children faced with remote education during the Coronavirus pandemic in the UK showed that 40 percent believed that their child's lack of focus on studying was an issue. Only 2 percent of parents believed that no internet connection was a challenge when learning remotely from home.

Total enrollment count for students whose learning preference is remote or blended or missing and who have attended school in person at least once since September 16, 2020. Students attending charter schools, students receiving home or hospital instruction, pre-K students (3-K) attending New York City Early Education Centers (NYCEECs), and students attending some District 79 programs are not included. In order to comply with regulations of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) on public reporting of education outcomes, data for groups with 5 or fewer students enrolled are suppressed with an “s”. In addition, corresponding groups with the next lowest number of students enrolled are suppressed when they could reveal, through addition or subtraction, the underlying numbers that have been redacted.

Snapshot img

Distance Learning Market Size 2024-2028

The distance learning market size is forecast to increase by USD 149.23 billion at a CAGR of 9.65% between 2023 and 2028.

The growing demand for distance learning, fueled by the continuous development of technology, is a key driver of the distance learning market. As technology improves, online education becomes more accessible, engaging, and effective, allowing students to learn remotely with ease. The integration of advanced tools such as video conferencing, AI-driven assessments, and interactive content is further enhancing the appeal of distance learning.
In North America, the market is experiencing significant growth due to the integration of advanced technologies and shifting educational preferences. With a growing emphasis on flexible, personalized learning experiences, including self-paced e-learning, institutions are increasingly offering distance learning programs that cater to diverse student needs. This trend is expected to continue, contributing to the market's expansion in the region.

What will be the Size of the Distance Learning Market During the Forecast Period?

Request Free Sample

The market is experiencing significant growth due to the increasing adoption of remote learning solutions among K-12 students and higher education students. Online assessments, video conferencing sessions, and virtual schools are becoming popular flexible education options for students who require flexibility in their learning schedules. Website-based mediums and application-based mediums, such as e-learning platforms, are increasingly being used to deliver educational programs. Internet access is essential for distance learning, making online learning platforms an indispensable tool for universities and colleges.

Market Segmentation

The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD Billion' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018 - 2022 for the following segments.

Type

  Traditional
  Online


Method

  Synchronous distance learning
  Asynchronous distance learning


Geography

  North America

    Canada
    US


  Europe

    Germany
    UK


  APAC

    China


  Middle East and Africa



  South America

By Type Insights

The traditional segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. The market encompasses various methods and technologies, including gamification, personalized learning pathways, educational environments, and remote learning techniques. Traditional distance learning, characterized by asynchronous online courses, pre-recorded lecture books, and minimal instructor interaction, remains a significant revenue contributor. This approach caters to a broad audience, particularly those with limited access to digital devices or high-internet connectivity. Academic institutions and the government sector continue to offer traditional distance learning programs, such as those provided by the Open University in the UK via mail. However, corporate blended learning, online education solutions, and personalized learning solutions are gaining popularity due to their interactive and technologically advanced nature.

These methods include learning management systems, virtual classrooms, mobile e-learning platforms, and cloud-based e-Learning platforms. Moreover, the use of intranet connection, computers, tutorials, podcasts, recorded lectures, e-books, and machine learning technology enhances the learning experience. The market also serves academic users and corporate users through service providers and content providers. The increasing literacy rate, internet penetration, and the need for continuous skill upgrading further fuel the market's growth.

Get a glance at the market share of various segments Request Free Sample

The traditional segment accounted for USD 152.29 billion in 2018 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

Regional Insights

North America is estimated to contribute 34% to the growth of the global market during the forecast period. Technavio's analysts have elaborately explained the regional trends and drivers that shape the market during the forecast period.

For more insights on the market share of various regions Request Free Sample

The market in North America is experiencing significant growth due to the integration of advanced technologies and shifting educational preferences. With the rise of gamification, personalized learning pathways, and educational environments, online education solutions have become increasingly popular. Academic institutions and the government sector are expanding their digital services, offering distance learning programs through Learning Management Systems and cloud-based e-Learning platforms. Remote learning methods, such as pre-recorded lectures, tutorials

This report includes Counts of students on summer school registration file broken out by borough, district and subgroups as of June, 2020. The counts represent traditional summer school registration. These numbers exclude the counts of students with 12-month IEPs who were registered for special education summer services and students who were registered for the DREAM program. They also exclude charter school and nonpublic school students who were enrolled in DOE programs.

The 2021-2022 School Learning Modalities dataset provides weekly estimates of school learning modality (including in-person, remote, or hybrid learning) for U.S. K-12 public and independent charter school districts for the 2021-2022 school year and the Fall 2022 semester, from August 2021 – December 2022. These data were modeled using multiple sources of input data (see below) to infer the most likely learning modality of a school district for a given week. These data should be considered district-level estimates and may not always reflect true learning modality, particularly for districts in which data are unavailable. If a district reports multiple modality types within the same week, the modality offered for the majority of those days is reflected in the weekly estimate. All school district metadata are sourced from the National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) for 2020-2021. School learning modality types are defined as follows: In-Person: All schools within the district offer face-to-face instruction 5 days per week to all students at all available grade levels. Remote: Schools within the district do not offer face-to-face instruction; all learning is conducted online/remotely to all students at all available grade levels. Hybrid: Schools within the district offer a combination of in-person and remote learning; face-to-face instruction is offered less than 5 days per week, or only to a subset of students. Data Information School learning modality data provided here are model estimates using combined input data and are not guaranteed to be 100% accurate. This learning modality dataset was generated by combining data from four different sources: Burbio [1], MCH Strategic Data [2], the AEI/Return to Learn Tracker [3], and state dashboards [4-20]. These data were combined using a Hidden Markov model which infers the sequence of learning modalities (In-Person, Hybrid, or Remote) for each district that is most likely to produce the modalities reported by these sources. This model was trained using data from the 2020-2021 school year. Metadata describing the location, number of schools and number of students in each district comes from NCES [21]. You can read more about the model in the CDC MMWR: COVID-19–Related School Closures and Learning Modality Changes — United States, August 1–September 17, 2021. The metrics listed for each school learning modality reflect totals by district and the number of enrolled students per district for which data are available. School districts represented here exclude private schools and include the following NCES subtypes: Public school district that is NOT a component of a supervisory union Public school district that is a component of a supervisory union Independent charter district “BI” in the state column refers to school districts funded by the Bureau of Indian Education. Technical Notes Data from August 1, 2021 to June 24, 2022 correspond to the 2021-2022 school year. During this time frame, data from the AEI/Return to Learn Tracker and most state dashboards were not available. Inferred modalities with a probability below 0.6 were deemed inconclusive and were omitted. During the Fall 2022 semester, modalities for districts with a school closure reported by Burbio were updated to either “Remote”, if the closure spanned the entire week, or “Hybrid”, if the closure spanned 1-4 days of the week. Data from August

In 2022, **** percent of higher education students in the United States were taking exclusively distance learning courses. A further **** percent of students were taking at least some distance learning courses. For both of these groups, this is a decrease from the previous year, demonstrating the declining impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

For fall 2020, when buildings reopened and students were able to return on-site, schools were advised to review any requests from families submitted via the remote learning device form and conduct an assessment of all of their devices (including recent purchases) in order to assign available devices to families in need . For any families where the school could not meet the need, schools confirmed that a device was needed by requesting that a device be prepared for that student after the City ordered the additional 100K ipads. Once receiving this confirmation, the central office prepared and shipped the device.

Please cite the following paper when using this dataset:

N. Thakur, “A Large-Scale Dataset of Twitter Chatter about Online Learning during the Current COVID-19 Omicron Wave,” Journal of Data, vol. 7, no. 8, p. 109, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/data7080109

Abstract

The COVID-19 Omicron variant, reported to be the most immune evasive variant of COVID-19, is resulting in a surge of COVID-19 cases globally. This has caused schools, colleges, and universities in different parts of the world to transition to online learning. As a result, social media platforms such as Twitter are seeing an increase in conversations, centered around information seeking and sharing, related to online learning. Mining such conversations, such as Tweets, to develop a dataset can serve as a data resource for interdisciplinary research related to the analysis of interest, views, opinions, perspectives, attitudes, and feedback towards online learning during the current surge of COVID-19 cases caused by the Omicron variant. Therefore this work presents a large-scale public Twitter dataset of conversations about online learning since the first detected case of the COVID-19 Omicron variant in November 2021. The dataset is compliant with the privacy policy, developer agreement, and guidelines for content redistribution of Twitter and the FAIR principles (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) principles for scientific data management.

Data Description

The dataset comprises a total of 52,984 Tweet IDs (that correspond to the same number of Tweets) about online learning that were posted on Twitter from 9th November 2021 to 13th July 2022. The earliest date was selected as 9th November 2021, as the Omicron variant was detected for the first time in a sample that was collected on this date. 13th July 2022 was the most recent date as per the time of data collection and publication of this dataset.

The dataset consists of 9 .txt files. An overview of these dataset files along with the number of Tweet IDs and the date range of the associated tweets is as follows. Table 1 shows the list of all the synonyms or terms that were used for the dataset development.

• Filename: TweetIDs_November_2021.txt (No. of Tweet IDs: 1283, Date Range of the associated Tweet IDs: November 1, 2021 to November 30, 2021)
• Filename: TweetIDs_December_2021.txt (No. of Tweet IDs: 10545, Date Range of the associated Tweet IDs: December 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021)
• Filename: TweetIDs_January_2022.txt (No. of Tweet IDs: 23078, Date Range of the associated Tweet IDs: January 1, 2022 to January 31, 2022)
• Filename: TweetIDs_February_2022.txt (No. of Tweet IDs: 4751, Date Range of the associated Tweet IDs: February 1, 2022 to February 28, 2022)
• Filename: TweetIDs_March_2022.txt (No. of Tweet IDs: 3434, Date Range of the associated Tweet IDs: March 1, 2022 to March 31, 2022)
• Filename: TweetIDs_April_2022.txt (No. of Tweet IDs: 3355, Date Range of the associated Tweet IDs: April 1, 2022 to April 30, 2022)
• Filename: TweetIDs_May_2022.txt (No. of Tweet IDs: 3120, Date Range of the associated Tweet IDs: May 1, 2022 to May 31, 2022)
• Filename: TweetIDs_June_2022.txt (No. of Tweet IDs: 2361, Date Range of the associated Tweet IDs: June 1, 2022 to June 30, 2022)
• Filename: TweetIDs_July_2022.txt (No. of Tweet IDs: 1057, Date Range of the associated Tweet IDs: July 1, 2022 to July 13, 2022)

The dataset contains only Tweet IDs in compliance with the terms and conditions mentioned in the privacy policy, developer agreement, and guidelines for content redistribution of Twitter. The Tweet IDs need to be hydrated to be used. For hydrating this dataset the Hydrator application (link to download and a step-by-step tutorial on how to use Hydrator) may be used.

Table 1. List of commonly used synonyms, terms, and phrases for online learning and COVID-19 that were used for the dataset development

Historical Dataset of Remote Learning is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Total Classroom Teachers Trends Over Years (2022-2023)

The 2020-2021 School Learning Modalities dataset provides weekly estimates of school learning modality (including in-person, remote, or hybrid learning) for U.S. K-12 public and independent charter school districts for the 2020-2021 school year, from August 2020 – June 2021. These data were modeled using multiple sources of input data (see below) to infer the most likely learning modality of a school district for a given week. These data should be considered district-level estimates and may not always reflect true learning modality, particularly for districts in which data are unavailable. If a district reports multiple modality types within the same week, the modality offered for the majority of those days is reflected in the weekly estimate. All school district metadata are sourced from the National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) for 2020-2021. School learning modality types are defined as follows: In-Person: All schools within the district offer face-to-face instruction 5 days per week to all students at all available grade levels. Remote: Schools within the district do not offer face-to-face instruction; all learning is conducted online/remotely to all students at all available grade levels. Hybrid: Schools within the district offer a combination of in-person and remote learning; face-to-face instruction is offered less than 5 days per week, or only to a subset of students. Data Information School learning modality data provided here are model estimates using combined input data and are not guaranteed to be 100% accurate. This learning modality dataset was generated by combining data from four different sources: Burbio [1], MCH Strategic Data [2], the AEI/Return to Learn Tracker [3], and state dashboards [4-20]. These data were combined using a Hidden Markov model which infers the sequence of learning modalities (In-Person, Hybrid, or Remote) for each district that is most likely to produce the modalities reported by these sources. This model was trained using data from the 2020-2021 school year. Metadata describing the _location, number of schools and number of students in each district comes from NCES [21]. You can read more about the model in the CDC MMWR: COVID-19–Related School Closures and Learning Modality Changes — United States, August 1–September 17, 2021. The metrics listed for each school learning modality reflect totals by district and the number of enrolled students per district for which data are available. School districts represented here exclude private schools and include the following NCES subtypes: Public school district that is NOT a component of a supervisory union Public school district that is a component of a supervisory union Independent charter district “BI” in the state column refers to school districts funded by the Bureau of Indian Education. Technical Notes Data from September 1, 2020 to June 25, 2021 correspond to the 2020-2021 school year. During this timeframe, all four sources of data were available. Inferred modalities with a probability below 0.75 were deemed inconclusive and were omitted. Data for the month of July may show “In Person” status although most school districts are effectively closed during this time for summer break. Users may wish to exclude July data from use for this reason where applicable. Sources K-12 School Opening Tracker. Burbio 2021; https

Description of Key Variables and Data SourcesReading Achievement: Percentages of grade 4 and grade 8 students whose NAEP 2015 reading achievement is at or above basic achievement level.Math Achievement: Percentages of grade 4 and grade 8 students whose NAEP 2015 math achievement is at or above the basic achievement level.Student Enrollment in Instructional Modes: Percentages of grade 4 and grade 8 students enrolled in different instructional delivery modes during Jan- May, 2021 (i.e., in-person, hybrid, or remote learning mode each). Data source: NAEP school survey 2021Remote Learning Environment and Engagement: The following set of NAEP student survey items were used to measure remote learning environment and engagement in ELA or math during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Data source: NAEP student survey 2022.Student’s experience of remote learning during last year (% yes)Student’s perceived difficulty of remote learning (% a lot or somewhat more difficult)Students’ self-efficacy to find online resources for remote learning (% probably or definitely can)Students’ self-efficacy to ask for help in remote learning (% probably or definitely can)Teacher’s availability to help with remote learning (% everyday or once/twice a week)Students’ access to digital/computing devices at home (% all the time or some of the time)Students’ access to high-speed Internet at home (% all the time)

Abstract: Introduction: Introduction: The teaching-learning process has undergone major technological changes over the decades, with a significant impact on medical courses. One of these changes has been the use of virtual learning environments (VLEs). Objective: to evaluate the quality of the remote teaching-learning process in the medical course during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: This is a descriptive study with a quantitative and qualitative approach. Its development was divided into 4 phases: literature review, development of the assessment protocol, data collection and analysis. Data collection was through an online form and data analysis was by statistical analysis on three axes: assessment of the technological profile, assessment of the acceptance of the technology and the user experience. Result: It was found that most students (65%) and teachers (88.2%) had the infrastructure to participate in the supplementary semester. Most students reported feeling safe in using technological tools and were satisfied with the remote teaching, however, 53% of students reported underachievement in relation to their performance in an ordinary classroom period and reported difficulties in adapting to remote learning, and 40.2% reported a high rate of psychological problems. Most teachers felt secure in teaching online and had a very positive overall evaluation of the remote semester, with only a few disagreements regarding the time to prepare classes and create teaching materials for their students. Conclusion: The various factors related to technology, organization and mental health of students and teachers must be taken into account in the planning of the next semesters, because until the health situation returns to normal, the forthcoming academic semesters will provide all the theoretical components of the medical course remotely, or at least the majority provided in a hybrid modality. It is likely that students and teachers will develop a learning curve and consequent adaptation, which may alleviate some of the difficulties observed. The adaptation process needs to be catalyzed by standards, guidelines and innovations from the university.

According to a survey conducted among headteachers at schools in England, approximately ** percent of primary school headteachers, and ** percent of secondary school headteachers advised that pupils' access to digital devices was the main barrier to effective use of remote learning technology.

Historical Dataset of Kettering City Schools Mcesc Remote Learning Center is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Total Students Trends Over Years (2022-2023),Distribution of Students By Grade Trends

These files contain the data access file, analysis files and instructions used to create the tables and figures found in Parent and Teacher Support of Elementary Student’s Remote Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany.Abstract from the related paper (Gunzenhauser et al., 2021): The aim of the present study was to investigate the associations between parental and teacher support and elementary students’ academic skills during the COVID-19 pandemic. Building on data of an ongoing longitudinal study, we studied the roles of children’s (N = 63) academic skills before the first COVID-19 lockdown in Germany (March-June 2020) as predictors of individual differences in parental schoolwork support during the lockdown, and the contributions of parental and teacher support to students’ reading and mathematics skills after the lockdown. Findings indicated that children’s reading and mathematics skills before the lockdown predicted parental help, and reading skills predicted parental need-oriented support with schoolwork during the lockdown. Children who received more need-oriented support from parents showed a more favorable development of arithmetic skills across the lockdown. Indicators of teacher support did not explain individual differences in students’ academic skills after the lockdown period.Gunzenhauser, C., Enke, S., Johann, V., Karbach, J., & Saalbach, H. (2021). Parent and teacher support of elementary students’ remote learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany. AERA Open.

This spring, students across the globe transitioned from in-person classes to remote learning as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. This unprecedented change to undergraduate education saw institutions adopting multiple online teaching modalities and instructional platforms. We sought to understand students’ experiences with and perspectives on those methods of remote instruction in order to inform pedagogical decisions during the current pandemic and in future development of online courses and virtual learning experiences. Our survey gathered quantitative and qualitative data regarding students’ experiences with synchronous and asynchronous methods of remote learning and specific pedagogical techniques associated with each. A total of 4,789 undergraduate participants representing institutions across 95 countries were recruited via Instagram. We find that most students prefer synchronous online classes, and students whose primary mode of remote instruction has been synchronous report being more engaged and motivated. Our qualitative data show that students miss the social aspects of learning on campus, and it is possible that synchronous learning helps to mitigate some feelings of isolation. Students whose synchronous classes include active-learning techniques (which are inherently more social) report significantly higher levels of engagement, motivation, enjoyment, and satisfaction with instruction. Respondents’ recommendations for changes emphasize increased engagement, interaction, and student participation. We conclude that active-learning methods, which are known to increase motivation, engagement, and learning in traditional classrooms, also have a positive impact in the remote-learning environment. Integrating these elements into online courses will improve the student experience.

Grounded in a strength-based (asset) model, this study explores the racial disparities in students’ learning and well-being during the pandemic. Linking the U.S. national/state databases of education and health, it examines whole-child outcomes and related factors—remote learning and protective community. It reveals race/ethnicity-stratified, state-level variations of learning and well-being losses in the midst of school accountability turnover. This data file includes aggregate state-level data derived from the NAEP and NSCH datasets, including all 50 U.S. states' pre-pandemic and post-pandemic measures of whole-child development outcomes (academic proficiency, socioemotional wellness, and physical health) as well as environmental conditions (remote learning and protective community) among school-age children. Methods To address the research questions, this study examines repeated cross-sectional datasets with nation/state-representative samples of school-age children. For academic achievement measures, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2019 and 2022 datasets are used to assess nationally representative samples of 4th-grade and 8th-grade students’ achievement in reading and math (http://www.nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard). In 2019, the NAEP samples included: 150,600 fourth graders from 8,300 schools and 143,100 eighth graders from 6,950 schools. In 2022, the NAEP samples included: (1) for reading, 108,200 fourth graders from 5,780 schools and 111,300 eighth graders from 5,190 schools; (2) for math, 116,200 fourth graders from 5,780 schools and 111,000 eighth graders from 5,190 schools. Data are weighted to be representative of the US population of students in grades 4 and 8, each for the entire nation and every state. Results are reported as average scores on a 0 to 500 scale and as percentages of students performing at or above the NAEP achievement levels: NAEP Basic, NAEP Proficient, and NAEP Advanced. In this study, we focus on changes in the percentages of students at or above the NAEP Basic level, which is the minimum competency level expected for all students across the nation. As a supplement to the NAEP assessment data, this study uses the NAEP School Dashboard (see https://ies.ed.gov/schoolsurvey/mss-dashboard/), which surveyed approximately 3,500 schools each month at grades 4 and 8 each during the pandemic period of January through May 2021: 46 states/jurisdictions participated, and 4,100 of 6,100 sampled schools responded. This study uses state-level information on the percentages of students who received in-person vs. remote/hybrid instructional modes. The school-reported remote learning enrollment rate is highly correlated with the NAEP survey student-reported remote learning experience (during 2021) across grades and subjects (r = .82 for grade 4 reading, r = .81 for grade 4 math, r = .79 for grade 8 reading, r = .83 for grade 8 math). These strong positive correlations provide supporting evidence for the cross-validation of remote learning measures at the state level. For socioemotional wellness and physical health measures, the National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) data are used. The 2018/19 surveys involved about 356,052 households screened for age-eligible children, and 59,963 child-level questionnaires were completed. The 2020/21 surveys involved about 199,840 households screened for age-eligible children, and 93,669 child-level questionnaires were completed. Our analysis focuses on school-age children (ages 6-17) in the data. In addition, the NSCH data are also used to assess the quality of protective and nurturing environment for child development across family, school, and neighborhood settings (see Appendix).

Historical Dataset of The Unlimited Classroom Dba Valley Virtual Remote Learning A is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Total Students Trends Over Years (2005-2023),Total Classroom Teachers Trends Over Years (2004-2023),Distribution of Students By Grade Trends,Student-Teacher Ratio Comparison Over Years (2004-2023),Asian Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2010-2021),Hispanic Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2005-2023),Black Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2005-2023),White Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2005-2023),Two or More Races Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2013-2023),Diversity Score Comparison Over Years (2005-2023),Free Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2007-2023),Reading and Language Arts Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2011-2022),Math Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2011-2022),Science Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2021-2022),Overall School Rank Trends Over Years (2011-2022),Graduation Rate Comparison Over Years (2012-2022)