100+ datasets found
  1. Worldwide factors surrounding preference of voice assistants over websites...

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 14, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2022). Worldwide factors surrounding preference of voice assistants over websites 2017 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/801980/worldwide-preference-voice-assistant-websites-app/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 14, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Oct 2017 - Nov 2017
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    The statistic shows the distribution of users potential preference for a voice assistants over a website or application worldwide, as of November 2017. According to the survey, 52 percent of respondents indicated that they would prefer a voice assistant to a website or app due to its convenience and 48 percent of respondents reported that voice assistants could allow them to multi-task or work hands free.

  2. Cloud data storage brand preferences of Americans in Q1 2016, by income

    • statista.com
    Updated May 1, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2016). Cloud data storage brand preferences of Americans in Q1 2016, by income [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/550987/united-states-brand-preferences-for-cloud-data-storage-by-income/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 1, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This statistic shows the results of a survey conducted in the first quarter of 2016 among 3,000 adult Americans on their preferred cloud data storage brand. The results were sorted by income tiers. During the survey, 31.2 percent of respondents earning less than 50,000 U.S.dollars per year stated their preferred cloud data storage brand is Amazon Cloud Drive. The same percentage of respondents earning more than 50,000 U.S. dollars per year agreed.

  3. h

    open-image-preferences-v1-binarized

    • huggingface.co
    Updated Dec 19, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data Is Better Together (2024). open-image-preferences-v1-binarized [Dataset]. https://huggingface.co/datasets/data-is-better-together/open-image-preferences-v1-binarized
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Dec 19, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Data Is Better Together
    License

    Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Open Image Preferences

     Prompt: Anime-style concept art of a Mayan Quetzalcoatl biomutant, dystopian world, vibrant colors, 4K.
    
    
    
         Image 1
    
    
    
         Image 2
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
     Prompt: 8-bit pixel art of a blue knight, green car, and glacier landscape in Norway, fantasy style, colorful and detailed.
    
    
    
         Image 1… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/data-is-better-together/open-image-preferences-v1-binarized.
    
  4. h

    wise-data-preferences

    • huggingface.co
    Updated Oct 11, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Meaning Alignment Institute (2024). wise-data-preferences [Dataset]. https://huggingface.co/datasets/meaningalignment/wise-data-preferences
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Oct 11, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Meaning Alignment Institute
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Dataset Summary

    The wise-data-preferences dataset is a synthetically created collection of values-laden conversations with preferred and rejected responses, designed to train language models to provide more nuanced and helpful responses to harmful, heavy, or exploratory questions. This dataset was specifically created to train the WiseLLama-8B model, a LLaMa-3.1-8B-Instruct model fine-tuned using DPO (Direct Preference Optimization).

      Dataset Creation… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/meaningalignment/wise-data-preferences.
    
  5. Share of top U.S. websites ignoring user privacy preferences 2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 4, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Share of top U.S. websites ignoring user privacy preferences 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1560221/us-privacy-preference-ignoring/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 4, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Sep 2024
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    As of September 2024, 75 percent of the 100 most visited websites in the United States shared personal data with advertising 3rd parties, even when users opted out. Moreover, 70 percent of them drop advertising 3rd party cookies even when users opt out.

  6. d

    Replication Data for: How Accurate are Surveyed Preferences for Public...

    • search.dataone.org
    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Nov 21, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Funk, Patricia (2023). Replication Data for: How Accurate are Surveyed Preferences for Public Policies? Evidence from a Unique Institutional Setup [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/7LOMGW
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 21, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Funk, Patricia
    Description

    Funk, Patricia, (2016) "How Accurate are Surveyed Preferences for Public Policies? Evidence from a Unique Institutional Setup." Review of Economics and Statistics 98:3, 442-454.

  7. d

    Consumer preference data for black coffee

    • datadryad.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • +1more
    zip
    Updated Jan 16, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    William Ristenpart; Andrew R. Cotter; Jean-Xavier Guinard (2023). Consumer preference data for black coffee [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25338/B8993H
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 16, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Dryad
    Authors
    William Ristenpart; Andrew R. Cotter; Jean-Xavier Guinard
    Time period covered
    2022
    Description

    The dataset consists of one large excel spreadsheet, which may be opened with Microsoft Excel or Google Sheets. Each row represents the data collected for one individual tasting by a panelist; all personal identifiers have been removed. The first row contains the 48 variable names. The variables are defined as follows:

    Judge: numerical identifier of an individual person. Ranges from 1 to 118. Cluster: numerical identifier for which consumer preference segmentation cluster the individual judge was identified as belonging to. Either 1 or 2. (See Cotter et al. 2021). Week: identifies which week the tasting of that coffee occurred. Either 1, 2, or 3 for first, second, or third weeks respectively. Session Number: identifies which of the 18 unique tasting sessions this tasting occurred at. Ranges from 1 to 18 (with six tastings per week over three weeks). Position: identifies the order in which this specific coffee was sampled within a session....

  8. Descriptive statistics for samples with and without empty cells.

    • plos.figshare.com
    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Svea Michaelis; Levente Kriston; Martin Härter; Birgit Watzke; Holger Schulz; Hanne Melchior (2023). Descriptive statistics for samples with and without empty cells. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182203.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Svea Michaelis; Levente Kriston; Martin Härter; Birgit Watzke; Holger Schulz; Hanne Melchior
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Descriptive statistics for samples with and without empty cells.

  9. TV show viewing preference in the U.S. 2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Oct 29, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). TV show viewing preference in the U.S. 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/289653/tv-shows-release-preference-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 29, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Feb 2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The majority of 18 to 44-year-old U.S. consumers preferred to binge-watch a whole series, according to 40 percent of respondents to a 2023 survey. In comparison, the share of viewers aged 45 years and older stating to do so was 29 percent, while most of the people interviewed in this age group said that this depends on the TV show.

  10. Quarterly Data for Spoken Language Preferences of Supplemental Security...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Mar 8, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Social Security Administration (2025). Quarterly Data for Spoken Language Preferences of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Aged Initial Claims - FY 2023 On [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/quarterly-data-for-spoken-language-preferences-of-supplemental-security-income-ssi-aged-in
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 8, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Social Security Administrationhttp://www.ssa.gov/
    Description

    This dataset provides quarterly volumes for spoken language preferences at the national level of individuals filing claims for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Aged benefits for fiscal years (FY) 2023 on.

  11. Annual Data for Spoken Language Preferences of Supplemental Security Income...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Jan 24, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Social Security Administration (2025). Annual Data for Spoken Language Preferences of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Blind and Disabled Initial Claims - FY 2023 On [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/annual-data-for-spoken-language-preferences-of-supplemental-security-income-ssi-blind-and-
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 24, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Social Security Administrationhttp://www.ssa.gov/
    Description

    This data set provides annual volumes for spoken language preferences at the national level of individuals filing claims for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Blind and Disabled benefits for federal fiscal years (FY) 2023 on.

  12. Language preferences for written and spoken communications

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.amerigeoss.org
    Updated Mar 8, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Social Security Administration (2025). Language preferences for written and spoken communications [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/language-preferences-for-written-and-spoken-communications
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 8, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Social Security Administrationhttp://www.ssa.gov/
    Description

    This file contains SSA client's language preference for written and spoken communication only if the preference for written or spoken is other than English.

  13. Customer preference for online service between person and chatbot 2017

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 7, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2023). Customer preference for online service between person and chatbot 2017 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/716864/worldwide-customer-preference-for-online-chat-interaction/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 7, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2017
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    This statistic shows the preferences of customers who interact with customer services online, between a chatbot or virtual assistant and a live customer service representative, as of 2017. At the time of the survey, 80 percent of customers indicated they would prefer to interact with a real person rather than an intelligent robot or chatbot.

  14. Consumer Behavior Data | Consumer Goods & Electronics Industry Leaders in...

    • datarade.ai
    Updated Jan 1, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Success.ai (2018). Consumer Behavior Data | Consumer Goods & Electronics Industry Leaders in Asia, US, and Europe | Verified Global Profiles from 700M+ Dataset [Dataset]. https://datarade.ai/data-products/consumer-behavior-data-consumer-goods-electronics-industr-success-ai
    Explore at:
    .bin, .json, .xml, .csv, .xls, .sql, .txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 1, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Success.ai’s Consumer Behavior Data for Consumer Goods & Electronics Industry Leaders in Asia, the US, and Europe offers a robust dataset designed to empower businesses with actionable insights into global consumer trends and professional profiles. Covering executives, product managers, marketers, and other professionals in the consumer goods and electronics sectors, this dataset includes verified contact information, professional histories, and geographic business data.

    With access to over 700 million verified global profiles and firmographic data from leading companies, Success.ai ensures your outreach, market analysis, and strategic planning efforts are powered by accurate, continuously updated, and GDPR-compliant data. Backed by our Best Price Guarantee, this solution is ideal for businesses aiming to navigate and lead in these fast-paced industries.

    Why Choose Success.ai’s Consumer Behavior Data?

    1. Verified Contact Data for Precision Engagement

      • Access verified email addresses, phone numbers, and LinkedIn profiles of professionals in the consumer goods and electronics industries.
      • AI-driven validation ensures 99% accuracy, optimizing communication efficiency and minimizing data gaps.
    2. Comprehensive Global Coverage

      • Includes profiles from key markets in Asia, the US, and Europe, covering regions such as China, India, Germany, and the United States.
      • Gain insights into region-specific consumer trends, product preferences, and purchasing behaviors.
    3. Continuously Updated Datasets

      • Real-time updates capture career progressions, company expansions, market shifts, and consumer trend data.
      • Stay aligned with evolving market dynamics and seize emerging opportunities effectively.
    4. Ethical and Compliant

      • Fully adheres to GDPR, CCPA, and other global data privacy regulations, ensuring responsible use and legal compliance for all data-driven campaigns.

    Data Highlights:

    • 700M+ Verified Global Profiles: Connect with industry leaders, marketers, and decision-makers in consumer goods and electronics industries worldwide.
    • Consumer Trend Insights: Gain detailed insights into product preferences, purchasing patterns, and demographic influences.
    • Business Locations: Access geographic data to identify regional markets, operational hubs, and emerging consumer bases.
    • Professional Histories: Understand career trajectories, skills, and expertise of professionals driving innovation and strategy.

    Key Features of the Dataset:

    1. Decision-Maker Profiles in Consumer Goods and Electronics

      • Identify and engage with professionals responsible for product development, marketing strategy, and supply chain optimization.
      • Target individuals making decisions on consumer engagement, distribution, and market entry strategies.
    2. Advanced Filters for Precision Campaigns

      • Filter professionals by industry focus (consumer electronics, FMCG, luxury goods), geographic location, or job function.
      • Tailor campaigns to align with specific industry trends, market demands, and regional preferences.
    3. Consumer Trend Data and Insights

      • Access data on regional product preferences, spending behaviors, and purchasing influences across key global markets.
      • Leverage these insights to shape product development, marketing campaigns, and customer engagement strategies.
    4. AI-Driven Enrichment

      • Profiles enriched with actionable data allow for personalized messaging, highlight unique value propositions, and improve engagement outcomes.

    Strategic Use Cases:

    1. Marketing and Demand Generation

      • Design campaigns tailored to consumer preferences, regional trends, and target demographics in the consumer goods and electronics industries.
      • Leverage verified contact data for multi-channel outreach, including email, social media, and direct marketing.
    2. Market Research and Competitive Analysis

      • Analyze global consumer trends, spending patterns, and product preferences to refine your product portfolio and market positioning.
      • Benchmark against competitors to identify gaps, emerging needs, and growth opportunities in target regions.
    3. Sales and Partnership Development

      • Build relationships with key decision-makers at companies specializing in consumer goods or electronics manufacturing and distribution.
      • Present innovative solutions, supply chain partnerships, or co-marketing opportunities to grow your market share.
    4. Product Development and Innovation

      • Utilize consumer trend insights to inform product design, pricing strategies, and feature prioritization.
      • Develop offerings that align with regional preferences and purchasing behaviors to maximize market impact.

    Why Choose Success.ai?

    1. Best Price Guarantee
      • Access premium-quality consumer behavior data at competitive prices, ensuring maximum ROI for your outreach, research, and ma...
  15. Online data privacy and security preferences in China Q3 2024

    • flwrdeptvarieties.store
    • statista.com
    Updated Dec 12, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Lai Lin Thomala (2023). Online data privacy and security preferences in China Q3 2024 [Dataset]. https://flwrdeptvarieties.store/?_=%2Ftopics%2F11680%2Fcybersecurity-in-china%2F%23zUpilBfjadnZ6q5i9BcSHcxNYoVKuimb
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 12, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Lai Lin Thomala
    Area covered
    China
    Description

    According to a 2024 survey on digital usage in China, over a third of Chinese internet users said they used ad blockers when surfing the internet. One in five respondents expressed concerns about internet companies misusing their digital data.

  16. SYNTHETIC-1-Preference-Data

    • huggingface.co
    Updated Feb 20, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Prime Intellect (2025). SYNTHETIC-1-Preference-Data [Dataset]. https://huggingface.co/datasets/PrimeIntellect/SYNTHETIC-1-Preference-Data
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Feb 20, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Prime Intellect, Inc.
    Authors
    Prime Intellect
    License

    Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    SYNTHETIC-1: Two Million Crowdsourced Reasoning Traces from Deepseek-R1

    SYNTHETIC-1 is a reasoning dataset obtained from Deepseek-R1, generated with crowdsourced compute and annotated with diverse verifiers such as LLM judges or symbolic mathematics verifiers. This is the SFT version of the dataset - the raw data and SFT dataset can be found in our 🤗 SYNTHETIC-1 Collection. The dataset consists of the following tasks and verifiers that were implemented in our library genesys:… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/PrimeIntellect/SYNTHETIC-1-Preference-Data.

  17. Data from: A new method for statistical detection of directional and...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • datadryad.org
    • +1more
    zip
    Updated Feb 8, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Derek A. Roff; Daphne J. Fairbairn; Alexandra Prokuda (2017). A new method for statistical detection of directional and stabilizing mating preference [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.pj032
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 8, 2017
    Authors
    Derek A. Roff; Daphne J. Fairbairn; Alexandra Prokuda
    License

    https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html

    Description

    Estimation of mating preferences is a prerequisite for understanding how sexual selection through mate choice shapes both mating systems and sexual dimorphisms. Most studies of mating preferences assay mate choice using either a no choice or a binary choice design. Binary choice trials typically employ either an artificial signal or some fixed difference (e.g. colour or size) between the signalling individuals. Although statistically more powerful than no choice designs, such experiments cannot be used to detect stabilizing preference. Further, the use of artificial signals is problematic because signal components tend to be varied in isolation, and hence do not reflect natural variation. Here, we present a new method that uses natural variation among individuals in choice trials to determine if mating preference is absent, directional, and/or stabilizing. The protocol is tested using simulation and shown to be robust to the preference function, to have the required statistical power, to be unbiased in almost all cases, and to give confidence regions that modestly overestimate the desired 95% criterion. We demonstrate the use of the method with data from mate choice trials of the sand cricket, Gryllus firmus. Software to apply this new approach is provided in Dryad.

  18. w

    Data from: Four-year-old Children Align their Preferences with those of...

    • openscholarship.wustl.edu
    • data.library.wustl.edu
    docx, xlsx
    Updated Jun 27, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Hennefield, Laura; Markson, Lori (2017). Four-year-old Children Align their Preferences with those of their Peers DataSet [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7936/K7KP810V
    Explore at:
    docx(94511), xlsx(48192)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 27, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    Washington University in St. Louis
    Authors
    Hennefield, Laura; Markson, Lori
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Children express preferences for a wide range of options, such as objects, and frequently observe the preferences that others express towards these things. However, little is know about how these initial preferences develop. The present research investigated whether one particular type of social information – other children’s preferences – influences children’s own preferences. Four-year-old children observed, via video, two boys and two girls display the same preference for one of two stickers. Each child (peer) expressed liking for one sticker and dislike for the other. Then children completed two rounds of the Dictator Game, a classic resource distribution task. In each round, children distributed either 10 liked stickers or 10 disliked stickers (counterbalanced) between themselves and another child who was not present. If the preferences expressed by their peers influenced children’s own preferences, children should keep more of the liked than disliked stickers for themselves. In line with this prediction, more children kept more liked than disliked stickers, indicating their distribution patterns were influenced by their peers’ preferences. This finding suggests that children extracted informational content about the value of the stickers from their peers and used that information to guide their own preferences. Children might also have aligned their preferences with those of their peers to facilitate social bonding and group membership. This research demonstrates the strong influence of peers on children’s developing preferences, and reveals the effect of peer influence via video – a medium that young children are frequently exposed to but often struggle to learn from in other contexts.

  19. d

    General Practitioner Workforce in Alternative Settings, Experimental...

    • digital.nhs.uk
    Updated Aug 29, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2019). General Practitioner Workforce in Alternative Settings, Experimental Statistics [Dataset]. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/general-practitioner-workforce-in-alternative-settings
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 29, 2019
    License

    https://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditionshttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditions

    Description

    Background The nature of primary care provision is changing. GPs and other staff providing primary care are no longer based solely in general practices but may work in a range of other “settings”, for example providing extended hours, GP streaming in Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments, and Out-of-Hours services. There is an increasing need to understand the different ways in which GPs and their colleagues are providing primary care services. This is a complicated and ever-changing area. Most GPs work in general practices. Information about GPs and other practice-based staff is provided directly to NHS Digital on a quarterly basis by the GP practices which submit record-level data via the National Workforce Reporting System (NWRS). Information about these individuals and their associated workforce are published in General Practice Workforce statistics (https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/general-and-personal-medical-services). Similarly, information about GPs and other healthcare professionals directly employed by hospital trusts should be captured and included in NHS Workforce Statistics (https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-workforce-statistics). Additional work is required to identify which parts, if any, of this activity can reasonably be classified as primary care provision. In addition, where available, details of individuals providing NHS funded care in the independent sector are captured and reported in NHS Digital’s Independent Healthcare Provider Workforce Statistics (https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/independent-healthcare-provider-workforce-statistics). However, there remains an uncertain number of GPs and other healthcare professionals that are providing patient care in these alternative settings and whose information, including details of their working hours, is not collected. As understanding the entirety of the healthcare workforce, both NHS and independent sector, is crucial to meeting the needs of patients and vital for workforce planning, we have been working to better understand the nature of healthcare provision, and in particular, the scale and extent of GP provision outside the more traditional settings. The number of service providers in these alternative settings – which are not necessarily NHS organisations – is large and services are commissioned differently in each CCG making it difficult to identify GPs and to collect accurate and complete workforce data. We are working closely with key stakeholders including Department of Health and Social Care, NHS England and NHS Improvement and Health Education England to explore the best way to collect more accurate and complete data for this part of the GP workforce. This is likely to include reviewing whether sufficient improvements could be made to this quarterly collection to enhance the data quality, as well as considering whether it would be feasible, affordable or preferable to collect record-level data directly from providers. These are new and experimental statistics which are under development. We welcome feedback from users to help us evaluate their suitability and quality. Please send any comments to PrimaryCareWorkforce@nhs.net including “GPs in Alternative Settings” in the subject line. Your feedback about these experimental statistics will help us evaluate their usefulness and inform our future plans. While the experimental statistics designation should not be taken to indicate that the statistics are of poor quality, there are nonetheless a number of data quality considerations that affect the levels of confidence that may be bestowed upon the figures and users are advised to consult the Data Quality section of this release.

  20. h

    Arabic-preference-data-RLHF

    • huggingface.co
    Updated Sep 21, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    FreedomAI (2023). Arabic-preference-data-RLHF [Dataset]. https://huggingface.co/datasets/FreedomIntelligence/Arabic-preference-data-RLHF
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Sep 21, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    FreedomAI
    Description

    FreedomIntelligence/Arabic-preference-data-RLHF dataset hosted on Hugging Face and contributed by the HF Datasets community

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2022). Worldwide factors surrounding preference of voice assistants over websites 2017 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/801980/worldwide-preference-voice-assistant-websites-app/
Organization logo

Worldwide factors surrounding preference of voice assistants over websites 2017

Explore at:
5 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Feb 14, 2022
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
Oct 2017 - Nov 2017
Area covered
Worldwide
Description

The statistic shows the distribution of users potential preference for a voice assistants over a website or application worldwide, as of November 2017. According to the survey, 52 percent of respondents indicated that they would prefer a voice assistant to a website or app due to its convenience and 48 percent of respondents reported that voice assistants could allow them to multi-task or work hands free.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu