This is basically superstore sales performance report categorized by segment , year , region wise and many more. I took help from google, you tubes and than created this report in power BI. Apart from this I also created seperated charts and tables on next slides and some majorly used filters.

Spatial analysis and statistical summaries of the Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) provide land managers and decision makers with a general assessment of management intent for biodiversity protection, natural resource management, and recreation access across the nation. The PAD-US 3.0 Combined Fee, Designation, Easement feature class (with Military Lands and Tribal Areas from the Proclamation and Other Planning Boundaries feature class) was modified to remove overlaps, avoiding overestimation in protected area statistics and to support user needs. A Python scripted process ("PADUS3_0_CreateVectorAnalysisFileScript.zip") associated with this data release prioritized overlapping designations (e.g. Wilderness within a National Forest) based upon their relative biodiversity conservation status (e.g. GAP Status Code 1 over 2), public access values (in the order of Closed, Restricted, Open, Unknown), and geodatabase load order (records are deliberately organized in the PAD-US full inventory with fee owned lands loaded before overlapping management designations, and easements). The Vector Analysis File ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFile_ClipCensus.zip") associated item of PAD-US 3.0 Spatial Analysis and Statistics ( https://doi.org/10.5066/P9KLBB5D ) was clipped to the Census state boundary file to define the extent and serve as a common denominator for statistical summaries. Boundaries of interest to stakeholders (State, Department of the Interior Region, Congressional District, County, EcoRegions I-IV, Urban Areas, Landscape Conservation Cooperative) were incorporated into separate geodatabase feature classes to support various data summaries ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFileOtherExtents_Clip_Census.zip") and Comma-separated Value (CSV) tables ("PADUS3_0SummaryStatistics_TabularData_CSV.zip") summarizing "PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFileOtherExtents_Clip_Census.zip" are provided as an alternative format and enable users to explore and download summary statistics of interest (Comma-separated Table [CSV], Microsoft Excel Workbook [.XLSX], Portable Document Format [.PDF] Report) from the PAD-US Lands and Inland Water Statistics Dashboard ( https://www.usgs.gov/programs/gap-analysis-project/science/pad-us-statistics ). In addition, a "flattened" version of the PAD-US 3.0 combined file without other extent boundaries ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFile_ClipCensus.zip") allow for other applications that require a representation of overall protection status without overlapping designation boundaries. The "PADUS3_0VectorAnalysis_State_Clip_CENSUS2020" feature class ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFileOtherExtents_Clip_Census.gdb") is the source of the PAD-US 3.0 raster files (associated item of PAD-US 3.0 Spatial Analysis and Statistics, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9KLBB5D ). Note, the PAD-US inventory is now considered functionally complete with the vast majority of land protection types represented in some manner, while work continues to maintain updates and improve data quality (see inventory completeness estimates at: http://www.protectedlands.net/data-stewards/ ). In addition, changes in protected area status between versions of the PAD-US may be attributed to improving the completeness and accuracy of the spatial data more than actual management actions or new acquisitions. USGS provides no legal warranty for the use of this data. While PAD-US is the official aggregation of protected areas ( https://www.fgdc.gov/ngda-reports/NGDA_Datasets.html ), agencies are the best source of their lands data.

analyze the current population survey (cps) annual social and economic supplement (asec) with r the annual march cps-asec has been supplying the statistics for the census bureau's report on income, poverty, and health insurance coverage since 1948. wow. the us census bureau and the bureau of labor statistics ( bls) tag-team on this one. until the american community survey (acs) hit the scene in the early aughts (2000s), the current population survey had the largest sample size of all the annual general demographic data sets outside of the decennial census - about two hundred thousand respondents. this provides enough sample to conduct state- and a few large metro area-level analyses. your sample size will vanish if you start investigating subgroups b y state - consider pooling multiple years. county-level is a no-no. despite the american community survey's larger size, the cps-asec contains many more variables related to employment, sources of income, and insurance - and can be trended back to harry truman's presidency. aside from questions specifically asked about an annual experience (like income), many of the questions in this march data set should be t reated as point-in-time statistics. cps-asec generalizes to the united states non-institutional, non-active duty military population. the national bureau of economic research (nber) provides sas, spss, and stata importation scripts to create a rectangular file (rectangular data means only person-level records; household- and family-level information gets attached to each person). to import these files into r, the parse.SAScii function uses nber's sas code to determine how to import the fixed-width file, then RSQLite to put everything into a schnazzy database. you can try reading through the nber march 2012 sas importation code yourself, but it's a bit of a proc freak show. this new github repository contains three scripts: 2005-2012 asec - download all microdata.R down load the fixed-width file containing household, family, and person records import by separating this file into three tables, then merge 'em together at the person-level download the fixed-width file containing the person-level replicate weights merge the rectangular person-level file with the replicate weights, then store it in a sql database create a new variable - one - in the data table 2012 asec - analysis examples.R connect to the sql database created by the 'download all microdata' progr am create the complex sample survey object, using the replicate weights perform a boatload of analysis examples replicate census estimates - 2011.R connect to the sql database created by the 'download all microdata' program create the complex sample survey object, using the replicate weights match the sas output shown in the png file below 2011 asec replicate weight sas output.png statistic and standard error generated from the replicate-weighted example sas script contained in this census-provided person replicate weights usage instructions document. click here to view these three scripts for more detail about the current population survey - annual social and economic supplement (cps-asec), visit: the census bureau's current population survey page the bureau of labor statistics' current population survey page the current population survey's wikipedia article notes: interviews are conducted in march about experiences during the previous year. the file labeled 2012 includes information (income, work experience, health insurance) pertaining to 2011. when you use the current populat ion survey to talk about america, subract a year from the data file name. as of the 2010 file (the interview focusing on america during 2009), the cps-asec contains exciting new medical out-of-pocket spending variables most useful for supplemental (medical spending-adjusted) poverty research. confidential to sas, spss, stata, sudaan users: why are you still rubbing two sticks together after we've invented the butane lighter? time to transition to r. :D

This dataset contains metadata (title, abstract, date of publication, field, etc) for around 1 million academic articles. Each record contains additional information on the country of study and whether the article makes use of data. Machine learning tools were used to classify the country of study and data use.

Our data source of academic articles is the Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus (S2ORC) (Lo et al. 2020). The corpus contains more than 130 million English language academic papers across multiple disciplines. The papers included in the Semantic Scholar corpus are gathered directly from publishers, from open archives such as arXiv or PubMed, and crawled from the internet.

We placed some restrictions on the articles to make them usable and relevant for our purposes. First, only articles with an abstract and parsed PDF or latex file are included in the analysis. The full text of the abstract is necessary to classify the country of study and whether the article uses data. The parsed PDF and latex file are important for extracting important information like the date of publication and field of study. This restriction eliminated a large number of articles in the original corpus. Around 30 million articles remain after keeping only articles with a parsable (i.e., suitable for digital processing) PDF, and around 26% of those 30 million are eliminated when removing articles without an abstract. Second, only articles from the year 2000 to 2020 were considered. This restriction eliminated an additional 9% of the remaining articles. Finally, articles from the following fields of study were excluded, as we aim to focus on fields that are likely to use data produced by countries’ national statistical system: Biology, Chemistry, Engineering, Physics, Materials Science, Environmental Science, Geology, History, Philosophy, Math, Computer Science, and Art. Fields that are included are: Economics, Political Science, Business, Sociology, Medicine, and Psychology. This third restriction eliminated around 34% of the remaining articles. From an initial corpus of 136 million articles, this resulted in a final corpus of around 10 million articles.

Due to the intensive computer resources required, a set of 1,037,748 articles were randomly selected from the 10 million articles in our restricted corpus as a convenience sample.

The empirical approach employed in this project utilizes text mining with Natural Language Processing (NLP). The goal of NLP is to extract structured information from raw, unstructured text. In this project, NLP is used to extract the country of study and whether the paper makes use of data. We will discuss each of these in turn.

To determine the country or countries of study in each academic article, two approaches are employed based on information found in the title, abstract, or topic fields. The first approach uses regular expression searches based on the presence of ISO3166 country names. A defined set of country names is compiled, and the presence of these names is checked in the relevant fields. This approach is transparent, widely used in social science research, and easily extended to other languages. However, there is a potential for exclusion errors if a country’s name is spelled non-standardly.

The second approach is based on Named Entity Recognition (NER), which uses machine learning to identify objects from text, utilizing the spaCy Python library. The Named Entity Recognition algorithm splits text into named entities, and NER is used in this project to identify countries of study in the academic articles. SpaCy supports multiple languages and has been trained on multiple spellings of countries, overcoming some of the limitations of the regular expression approach. If a country is identified by either the regular expression search or NER, it is linked to the article. Note that one article can be linked to more than one country.

The second task is to classify whether the paper uses data. A supervised machine learning approach is employed, where 3500 publications were first randomly selected and manually labeled by human raters using the Mechanical Turk service (Paszke et al. 2019).[1] To make sure the human raters had a similar and appropriate definition of data in mind, they were given the following instructions before seeing their first paper:

Each of these documents is an academic article. The goal of this study is to measure whether a specific academic article is using data and from which country the data came.

There are two classification tasks in this exercise:

1. identifying whether an academic article is using data from any country

2. Identifying from which country that data came.

For task 1, we are looking specifically at the use of data. Data is any information that has been collected, observed, generated or created to produce research findings. As an example, a study that reports findings or analysis using a survey data, uses data. Some clues to indicate that a study does use data includes whether a survey or census is described, a statistical model estimated, or a table or means or summary statistics is reported.

After an article is classified as using data, please note the type of data used. The options are population or business census, survey data, administrative data, geospatial data, private sector data, and other data. If no data is used, then mark "Not applicable". In cases where multiple data types are used, please click multiple options.[2]

For task 2, we are looking at the country or countries that are studied in the article. In some cases, no country may be applicable. For instance, if the research is theoretical and has no specific country application. In some cases, the research article may involve multiple countries. In these cases, select all countries that are discussed in the paper.

We expect between 10 and 35 percent of all articles to use data.

The median amount of time that a worker spent on an article, measured as the time between when the article was accepted to be classified by the worker and when the classification was submitted was 25.4 minutes. If human raters were exclusively used rather than machine learning tools, then the corpus of 1,037,748 articles examined in this study would take around 50 years of human work time to review at a cost of $3,113,244, which assumes a cost of $3 per article as was paid to MTurk workers.

A model is next trained on the 3,500 labelled articles. We use a distilled version of the BERT (bidirectional Encoder Representations for transformers) model to encode raw text into a numeric format suitable for predictions (Devlin et al. (2018)). BERT is pre-trained on a large corpus comprising the Toronto Book Corpus and Wikipedia. The distilled version (DistilBERT) is a compressed model that is 60% the size of BERT and retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities and is 60% faster (Sanh, Debut, Chaumond, Wolf 2019). We use PyTorch to produce a model to classify articles based on the labeled data. Of the 3,500 articles that were hand coded by the MTurk workers, 900 are fed to the machine learning model. 900 articles were selected because of computational limitations in training the NLP model. A classification of “uses data” was assigned if the model predicted an article used data with at least 90% confidence.

The performance of the models classifying articles to countries and as using data or not can be compared to the classification by the human raters. We consider the human raters as giving us the ground truth. This may underestimate the model performance if the workers at times got the allocation wrong in a way that would not apply to the model. For instance, a human rater could mistake the Republic of Korea for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. If both humans and the model perform the same kind of errors, then the performance reported here will be overestimated.

The model was able to predict whether an article made use of data with 87% accuracy evaluated on the set of articles held out of the model training. The correlation between the number of articles written about each country using data estimated under the two approaches is given in the figure below. The number of articles represents an aggregate total of

Public health-related decision-making on policies aimed at controlling the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak depends on complex epidemiological models that are compelled to be robust and use all relevant available data. This data article provides a new combined worldwide COVID-19 dataset obtained from official data sources with improved systematic measurement errors and a dedicated dashboard for online data visualization and summary. The dataset adds new measures and attributes to the normal attributes of official data sources, such as daily mortality, and fatality rates. We used comparative statistical analysis to evaluate the measurement errors of COVID-19 official data collections from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese CDC), World Health Organization (WHO) and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The data is collected by using text mining techniques and reviewing pdf reports, metadata, and reference data. The combined dataset includes complete spatial data such as countries area, international number of countries, Alpha-2 code, Alpha-3 code, latitude, longitude, and some additional attributes such as population. The improved dataset benefits from major corrections on the referenced data sets and official reports such as adjustments in the reporting dates, which suffered from a one to two days lag, removing negative values, detecting unreasonable changes in historical data in new reports and corrections on systematic measurement errors, which have been increasing as the pandemic outbreak spreads and more countries contribute data for the official repositories. Additionally, the root mean square error of attributes in the paired comparison of datasets was used to identify the main data problems. The data for China is presented separately and in more detail, and it has been extracted from the attached reports available on the main page of the CCDC website. This dataset is a comprehensive and reliable source of worldwide COVID-19 data that can be used in epidemiological models assessing the magnitude and timeline for confirmed cases, long-term predictions of deaths or hospital utilization, the effects of quarantine, stay-at-home orders and other social distancing measures, the pandemic’s turning point or in economic and social impact analysis, helping to inform national and local authorities on how to implement an adaptive response approach to re-opening the economy, re-open schools, alleviate business and social distancing restrictions, design economic programs or allow sports events to resume.

Dataset

This dataset was created by AmitRaghav007

Contents

E commerce website data to make reports.

This dataset shows whether each dataset on data.maryland.gov has been updated recently enough. For example, datasets containing weekly data should be updated at least every 7 days. Datasets containing monthly data should be updated at least every 31 days. This dataset also shows a compendium of metadata from all data.maryland.gov datasets.

This report was created by the Department of Information Technology (DoIT) on August 12 2015. New reports will be uploaded daily (this report is itself included in the report, so that users can see whether new reports are consistently being uploaded each week). Generation of this report uses the Socrata Open Data (API) to retrieve metadata on date of last data update and update frequency. Analysis and formatting of the metadata use Javascript, jQuery, and AJAX.

This report will be used during meetings of the Maryland Open Data Council to curate datasets for maintenance and make sure the Open Data Portal's data stays up to date.

This dataset shows whether each dataset on data.maryland.gov has been updated recently enough. For example, datasets containing weekly data should be updated at least every 7 days. Datasets containing monthly data should be updated at least every 31 days. This dataset also shows a compendium of metadata from all data.maryland.gov datasets.

This report was created by the Department of Information Technology (DoIT) on August 12 2015. New reports will be uploaded daily (this report is itself included in the report, so that users can see whether new reports are consistently being uploaded each week). Generation of this report uses the Socrata Open Data (API) to retrieve metadata on date of last data update and update frequency. Analysis and formatting of the metadata use Javascript, jQuery, and AJAX.

This report will be used during meetings of the Maryland Open Data Council to curate datasets for maintenance and make sure the Open Data Portal's data stays up to date.

This dataset shows whether each dataset on data.maryland.gov has been updated recently enough. For example, datasets containing weekly data should be updated at least every 7 days. Datasets containing monthly data should be updated at least every 31 days. This dataset also shows a compendium of metadata from all data.maryland.gov datasets.

This report was created by the Department of Information Technology (DoIT) on August 12 2015. New reports will be uploaded daily (this report is itself included in the report, so that users can see whether new reports are consistently being uploaded each week). Generation of this report uses the Socrata Open Data (API) to retrieve metadata on date of last data update and update frequency. Analysis and formatting of the metadata use Javascript, jQuery, and AJAX.

This report will be used during meetings of the Maryland Open Data Council to curate datasets for maintenance and make sure the Open Data Portal's data stays up to date.

A file containing all Min/Max Baseline Reports for 2005-2023 in their original format is available in the Attachments section below. A second file includes a separate set of reports, made available from 2002-2017, that did not include OLDMEDLINE records. MEDLINE/PubMed annual statistical reports are based upon the data elements in the baseline versions of MEDLINE®/PubMed are available. For each year covered the reports include: total citations containing each element; total occurrences of each element; minimum/average/maximum occurrences of each element in a record; minimum/average/maximum length of a single element occurrence; average record size; and other statistical data describing the content and size of the elements.

This template outlines what should be included in the Semiannual Progress Report, which is due every 180 days after implementation begins.

Metadata-only record linking to the original dataset. Open original dataset below.

MEDLINE/PubMed Baseline Statistics: Misc Report

  Description

A file containing all Misc Baseline Reports for 2018-2023 in their original format is available in the Attachments section below. MEDLINE/PubMed annual statistical reports are based upon the data elements in the baseline versions of MEDLINE®/PubMed are available. For each year covered the reports include: total citations containing each element; total occurrences of each element; minimum/average/maximum… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/HHS-Official/medlinepubmed-baseline-statistics-misc-report.

This dataset shows whether each dataset on data.maryland.gov has been updated recently enough. For example, datasets containing weekly data should be updated at least every 7 days. Datasets containing monthly data should be updated at least every 31 days. This dataset also shows a compendium of metadata from all data.maryland.gov datasets.

This report was created by the Department of Information Technology (DoIT) on August 12 2015. New reports will be uploaded daily (this report is itself included in the report, so that users can see whether new reports are consistently being uploaded each week). Generation of this report uses the Socrata Open Data (API) to retrieve metadata on date of last data update and update frequency. Analysis and formatting of the metadata use Javascript, jQuery, and AJAX.

This report will be used during meetings of the Maryland Open Data Council to curate datasets for maintenance and make sure the Open Data Portal's data stays up to date.

The goal of this report is to further document the 2018 NSDUH sample experiences, including a comparison of actual sample yields to state and quarter targets, a comparison of achieved and expected design effects (DEFFs) and relative standard errors, and documentation of any issue encountered during sample implementation. The 2018 sample design is thoroughly documented in the 2018 NSDUH sample design report (Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, 2019a).

In California, water systems serving one (1) to 15 households are regulated at the county level. Counties vary in their practices, but rarely do counties collect data regularly from these systems. Even where data is collected, it is entirely voluntary. A review of well permit information suggests there are over 1 million such water systems in California.

In early 2014, a cross-agency Work Group created an easily accessible reporting system to get more systematic data on which parts of the state had households at risk of water supply shortages. The initial motivation for local water supply systems to report shortage information was to obtain statewide drought assistance. The reporting system receives ongoing reports of shortages from local, state, federal and non-governmental organizations, and tracks their status to resolution. While several counties have developed their own tracking mechanisms, this data is manually entered into the reporting system.

The cross-agency team, led by DWR, seeks to verify and update the data submitted. However, due to the volunteer nature of the reporting and limitations on reporting agencies, collected data are undoubtedly under-representative of all shortages to have occurred. In addition, reports are received from multiple sources and there are occasionally errors and omissions that can create duplicate entries, non-household water supply reporting, and under-reporting. For example, missing information or no data for a given county does not necessarily mean that there are no household water shortages in the county, rather only that none have been reported to the State.

The data represents and example output for environmental data (i.e. climate and pollution) linked with individual events through location and time. The linkage is the result of a semantic query that integrates environmental data within an area relevant to the event and selects a period of data before the event.

The resulting event-environmental linked data contains:

• The data for analysis as a data table (.csv) and graph (.ttl)
• The metadata describing the linkage process and the data (.csv and .ttl)
• The interactive report to explore the (meta)data (.html)

The graph files are ready to be shared and published as Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data, including the necessary information to be reused by other researchers in different contexts.

Other statistics published alongside the statistical first release. These are not National Statistics, but complement the information in the main release. FE trends FE trends provides an overview of adult (19+) government-funded further education and all age apprenticeships in England. It looks to provide trends between 2008/09 and 2013/14 and to give an overview of FE provision, characteristics of learners and outcomes over time. International Comparisons Supplementary Tables The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) produces an annual publication, Education at a Glance, providing a variety of comparisons between OECD countries. The table provided here contains a summary of the relative ranking in education attainment of the 25-64 year old population in OECD countries in 2012. The OECD statistics use the International Standard Classification of Education. Within this, “at least upper secondary education” is equivalent to holding qualifications at Level 2 or above in the UK, and “tertiary education” is equivalent to holding qualifications at Level 4 or above in the UK. STEM This research is the result of a Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) funded, sector led project to gather and analyse data to inform the contribution that further education makes to STEM in England. This project was led by The Royal Academy of Engineering, and governance of the project was specifically designed to ensure that those with an interest in STEM were actively engaged and involved in directing and prioritising outputs. The November 2012 report builds on the FE and Skills STEM Data report published in July 2011 (below). It provides further analysis and interpretation of the existing data in a highly graphical format. It uses the same classified list of S,T, E and M qualifications as the 2011 report compiled through an analysis of the Register of Regulated Qualifications and the Learning Aim Database, updated with the most recent completions and achievements data taken from the Individualised Learner Record and the National Pupil Database.

This dataset shows whether each dataset on data.maryland.gov has been updated recently enough. For example, datasets containing weekly data should be updated at least every 7 days. Datasets containing monthly data should be updated at least every 31 days. This dataset also shows a compendium of metadata from all data.maryland.gov datasets.

This report was created by the Department of Information Technology (DoIT) on August 12 2015. New reports will be uploaded daily (this report is itself included in the report, so that users can see whether new reports are consistently being uploaded each week). Generation of this report uses the Socrata Open Data (API) to retrieve metadata on date of last data update and update frequency. Analysis and formatting of the metadata use Javascript, jQuery, and AJAX.

This report will be used during meetings of the Maryland Open Data Council to curate datasets for maintenance and make sure the Open Data Portal's data stays up to date.

The goal of this report is to further document the 2015 NSDUH sample experiences, including a comparison of actual sample yields to state and quarter targets, a comparison of achieved and expected design effects (DEFFs) and relative standard errors (RSEs), and documentation of any issues encountered during sample implementation.

The goal of this report is to further document the 2016 NSDUH sample experiences, including a comparison of actual sample yields to state and quarter targets, a comparison of achieved and expected design effects (DEFFs) and relative standard errors (RSEs), and documentation of any issues encountered during sample implementation (none in 2016).