The geographic extent of a territorial subdivision for electing members to a legislative body.

This dataset is a compilation of county parcel data from Minnesota counties that have opted-in for their parcel data to be included in this dataset.

It includes the following 59 counties that have opted-in as of the publication date of this dataset: Aitkin County, Anoka County, Becker County, Benton County, Big Stone County, Carlton County, Carver County, Cass County, Chippewa County, Chisago County, Clay County, Clearwater County, Cook County, Crow Wing County, Dakota County, Douglas County, Fillmore County, Grant County, Hennepin County, Houston County, Isanti County, Itasca County, Jackson County, Koochiching County, Lac qui Parle County, Lake County, Lake of the Woods County, Lyon County, Marshall County, McLeod County, Mille Lacs County, Morrison County, Mower County, Murray County, Norman County, Olmsted County, Otter Tail County, Pennington County, Pipestone County, Polk County, Pope County, Ramsey County, Red Lake County, Renville County, Rice County, Scott County, Sherburne County, St. Louis County, Stearns County, Steele County, Stevens County, Traverse County, Wabasha County, Waseca County, Washington County, Wilkin County, Winona County, Wright County, and Yellow Medicine County.

If you represent a county not included in this dataset and would like to opt-in, please contact Heather Albrecht (Heather.Albrecht@hennepin.us), co-chair of the Minnesota Geospatial Advisory Council (GAC)’s Parcels and Land Records Committee's Open Data Subcommittee. County parcel data does not need to be in the GAC parcel data standard to be included. MnGeo will map the county fields to the GAC standard.

County parcel data records have been assembled into a single dataset with a common coordinate system (UTM Zone 15) and common attribute schema. The county parcel data attributes have been mapped to the GAC parcel data standard for Minnesota: https://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/committee/standards/parcel_attrib/parcel_attrib.html

This compiled parcel dataset was created using Python code developed by Minnesota state agency GIS professionals, and represents a best effort to map individual county source file attributes into the common attribute schema of the GAC parcel data standard. The attributes from counties are mapped to the most appropriate destination column. In some cases, the county source files included attributes that were not mapped to the GAC standard. Additionally, some county attribute fields were parsed and mapped to multiple GAC standard fields, such as a single line address. Each quarter, MnGeo provides a text file to counties that shows how county fields are mapped to the GAC standard. Additionally, this text file shows the fields that are not mapped to the standard and those that are parsed. If a county shares changes to how their data should be mapped, MnGeo updates the compilation. If you represent a county and would like to update how MnGeo is mapping your county attribute fields to this compiled dataset, please contact us.

This dataset is a snapshot of parcel data, and the source date of the county data may vary. Users should consult County websites to see the most up-to-date and complete parcel data.

There have been recent changes in date/time fields, and their processing, introduced by our software vendor. In some cases, this has resulted in date fields being empty. We are aware of the issue and are working to correct it for future parcel data releases.

The State of Minnesota makes no representation or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the use or reuse of data provided herewith, regardless of its format or the means of its transmission. THE DATA IS PROVIDED “AS IS” WITH NO GUARANTEE OR REPRESENTATION ABOUT THE ACCURACY, CURRENCY, SUITABILITY, PERFORMANCE, MECHANTABILITY, RELIABILITY OR FITINESS OF THIS DATA FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. This dataset is NOT suitable for accurate boundary determination. Contact a licensed land surveyor if you have questions about boundary determinations.

DOWNLOAD NOTES: This dataset is only provided in Esri File Geodatabase and OGC GeoPackage formats. A shapefile is not available because the size of the dataset exceeds the limit for that format. The distribution version of the fgdb is compressed to help reduce the data footprint. QGIS users should consider using the Geopackage format for better results.

Generally the smallest level of geography established for purposes of conducting elections along with polling places.

This dataset, photogrammetrically compiled and published at a scale of 1"=100', was produced from aerial imagery collected in April 2023 using UltraCAM Eagle camera and covers entire Westchester County,NY. It is described as 'barrier_line' and delivered as a planimetric layer from 2023 imagery compiled/updated in 3D environment using 6" GSD imagery. The layer includes road barriers, guard rails, noise walls, stone walls, retaining walls and concrete walls. Concrete walls, stone walls and retaining walls found within a property are not represented.

The ZIP file consist of GIS files and an Access database with information about the excavations, findings and other metadata about the archaeological survey.

The published representation of real property areas, combined with assessing and tax information from CAMA and Tax systems, and organized for consumption in desktop and web applications.

GIS-material for the archaeological project: Preliminary investigations at the bypass Vadstena

The data is available in two formats: a ZIP file containing GIS shapefiles connected to an Access datafile containing information pertaining to excavation area, finds, object types along with other metadata regarding the archaeological investigation. The second ZIP file consists of corresponding .gml and .xlsx files.

The ZIP file consist of GIS files with information about the excavations, findings and other metadata about the archaeological survey.

The information in the abstract is translated from the archaeological report: During August 2003, the County Museum of Östergötland performed an archaeological assessment (phase 1) in the Källhem area, by request of Linköping municipality and due to planned house construction work. Two areas (Object 1 and 2), that were likely to contain archaeological remains, were identified. During phase 2 of the assessment, search trenches were dug within these areas. Within Object 1, one sole post hole was discovered. Within Object 2,162 settlement features such as pits, post holes, hearths and cultural layers were discovered, as well as stray finds consisting of flint, quartz, burnt bones and slag. Features were found all over the area of Object 2 and the settlement is likely to continue to the north-west, outside this area. The County Museum of Östergötland suggests that a field evaluation is performed before this area is developed. There are also two known ancient monuments within Object 2, RAÄ 122 and 46. The area containing these monuments will not be developed and has thus not been surveyed (in phase 2 of the assessment).

Purpose:

The information in the purpose is translated from the archaeological report: The purpose of the assessment was to investigate whether any ancient monuments were going to be affected by the local plan. The results of the assessment were to form the basis of future decisions by the County Administrative Board, regarding the archaeological remnants, and serve as guidance in the further local planning.

The ZIP file consist of GIS files with information about the excavations, findings and other metadata about the archaeological survey.

A point feature class of the Florida Turnpike mile marker signs posted on the roadway (may also be referred to as mile points) within Miami-Dade County. This layer contains the Turnpike milemarker signs in Miami-Dade County. A stone marker set up on a roadside to indicate the distance in miles from a given point. On most interstates, mile marker numbers begin at the south state line on north-south routes and increase as you travel north. On east-west routes, the numbers begin on the western state border and increase as you travel east.Updated: Not Planned The data was created using: Projected Coordinate System: WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_SphereProjection: Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere

The information in the abstract is translated from the archeological report: A new wind turbine with a connection road, a crane site and an electric cable that will be connected to a nearby power line, are planned within the property Rävsjö 1:1, Fivelstad parish, Motala municipality, Östergötland county. Several stone axes and other prehistoric remains have been found in the vicinity. The Swedish National Heritage Board's contract archeology division, UV Öst, has thus performed a preliminary investigation, conducted as an archaeological inspection, in April 2008. A total of 14 trenches were excavated on the field. A prehistoric hearth (RAÄ 85) was found in one of the trial trenches on the spot the wind turbine was planned. The hearth was excavated and interpreted as being solitary, since no other remains were found in the nearby trenches. The electric cable will be laid along an existing road and connected between the wind turbine and Rävsjö farm. Three trial trenches were excavated along the highest point of the cable stretch. In one of the trenches two hearths were found and excavated, of which one might be a furnace. The remains are probably part of the outskirt of a prehistoric settlement, of which the most part is judged to be located east of the road. The developer was able to avoid the the settlement remains (registered as RAÄ 84) and no further archaeological measures are thus suggested.

Purpose:

The information in the purpose is translated from the archeological report: The aim of the preliminary investigation was to determine whether the construction of the new wind turbine would affect any archaeological remains. Any remains found were to be avoided, if possible, by locating the power line, road and wind turbine where the remains would not be damaged.

The ZIP file consist of GIS files and an Access database with information about the excavations, findings and other metadata about the archaeological survey.