DOUGLAS COUNTY SURVEY/GISGIS PARCEL MAPPING GUIDELINES FOR PARCEL DISCREPANCIESIt is the intent of the Douglas County GIS Parcel Mapping to accurately identify the areas of land parcels to be valued and taxed 1. Discrepancies in areas• The Auditor/Assessor (tax) acreage areas started with the original US General Land Office (GLO) township plat maps created from the Public Land Survey (PLS) that was done between 1858 and 1871. The recovery of the PLS corners and the accurate location of these corners with GPS obtained coordinates has allowed for accurate section subdivisions, which results in accurate areas for parcels based on legal descriptions, which may be significantly different than the original areas. (See Example 2)• Any parcel bordering a meandered lake and/or a water boundary will likely have a disparity of area between the Auditor/Assessor acreages and the GIS acreages because of the inaccuracy of the original GLO meander lines from which the original areas were determined. Water lines are not able to be drafted to the same accuracy as the normal parcel lines. The water lines are usually just sketched on a survey and their dimensions are not generally given on a land record. The water boundaries of our GIS parcels are located from aerial photography. This is a subjective determination based on the interpretation by the Survey/GIS technician of what is water. Some lakes fluctuate significantly and the areas of all parcels bordering water are subject to constant change. In these cases the ordinary high water line (OHW) is attempted to be identified. Use of 2-foot contours will be made, if available. (See Example 1)• Some land records do not accurately report the area described in the land description and the description area is ignored. (See Example 3)• The parcel mapping has made every attempt to map the parcels based on available survey information as surveyed and located on the ground. This may conflict with some record legal descriptions.Solutions• If an actual survey by a licensed Land Surveyor is available, it will be utilized for the tax acreage.• If the Auditor/Assessor finds a discrepancy between the tax and GIS areas, they will request a review by the County Survey/GIS department.• As a starting guideline, the County Survey/GIS department will identify all parcels that differ in tax area versus GIS parcel area of 10 % or more and a difference of at least 5 acres. (This could be expanded later after the initial review.)• Each of these identified parcels will be reviewed individually by the County Survey/GIS department to determine the reason for the discrepancy and a recommendation will be made by the County Survey/GIS department to the Auditor/Assessor if the change should be made or not.• If a change is to be made to the tax area, a letter will be sent to the taxpayer informing them that their area will be changed during the next tax cycle, which could affect their property valuation. This letter will originate from the Auditor/Assessor with explanation from the County Survey/GIS department. 2. Gaps and Overlaps• Land descriptions for adjoining parcels sometimes overlap or leave a gap between them.o In these instances the Survey/GIS technician has to make a decision where to place this boundary. A number of circumstances are reviewed to facilitate this decision as these dilemmas are usually decided on a case by case basis. All effort will be made to not leave a gap, but sometimes this is not possible and the gap will be shown with “unknown” ownership. (Note: The County does not have the authority to change boundaries!)o Some of the circumstances reviewed are: Which parcel had the initial legal description? Does the physical occupation of the parcel line as shown on the air photo more closely fit one of the described parcels? Interpretation of the intent of the legal description. Is the legal description surveyable?Note: These overlaps will be shown on the GIS map with a dashed “survey line” and accompanying text for the line not used for the parcel boundary. 3. Parcel lines that do not match location of buildings Structures on parcels do not always lie within the boundaries of the parcel. This may be a circumstance of building without the benefit of a survey or of misinterpreting these boundaries. The parcel lines should be shown accurately as surveyed and/or described regardless of the location of structures on the ground. NOTE: The GIS mapping is not a survey, but is an interpretation of parcel boundaries predicated upon resources available to the County Survey/GIS department.Gary Stevenson Page 1 7/21/2017Example 1Example 2A Example 2B Example 3
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
Preliminary Plats and entitlements in Ada County and Canyon County. This map also contains parcel boundaries, and subdivisions to help determine the status of development.
To access parcel information:Enter an address or zoom in by using the +/- tools or your mouse scroll wheel. Parcels will draw when zoomed in.Click on a parcel to display a popup with information about that parcel.Click the "Basemap" button to display background aerial imagery.From the "Layers" button you can turn map features on and off.Complete Help (PDF)Parcel Legend:Full Map LegendAbout this ViewerThis viewer displays land property boundaries from assessor parcel maps across Massachusetts. Each parcel is linked to selected descriptive information from assessor databases. Data for all 351 cities and towns are the standardized "Level 3" tax parcels served by MassGIS. More details ...Read about and download parcel dataUpdatesV 1.1: Added 'Layers' tab. (2018)V 1.2: Reformatted popup to use HTML table for columns and made address larger. (Jan 2019)V 1.3: Added 'Download Parcel Data by City/Town' option to list of layers. This box is checked off by default but when activated a user can identify anywhere and download data for that entire city/town, except Boston. (March 14, 2019)V 1.4: Data for Boston is included in the "Level 3" standardized parcels layer. (August 10, 2020)V 1.4 MassGIS, EOTSS 2021
Map containing the layers for the Parcel Report tool on the Planning Dept website. Location: https://www.countyofnapa.org/589/Planning-Building-Environmental-Services\Business\Parcel Report ToolInstant App:Id: fcbc684ce24f4220b1fa383bdeed2371Url: https://napacounty.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/nearby/index.html?appid=fcbc684ce24f4220b1fa383bdeed2371Layers:Both Parcels and Address are Enterprise Hosted Layers.
More MetadataThis layer depicts the 1 mile subdivsion control area around the Town of Hamilton and the Town of Middleburg, as established by Section 1241.03 of the Land Subdivision and Development Ordinance. The Town of Purcellville subdivision control area ceased to exist upon dissolution of the Purcellville Urban Growth Area Management Plan (PUGAMP) and the Town of Purcellville/County of Loudoun Annexation Agreement in 2013. The control area around the Town of Hamilton is based on the map prepared by the County of Loudoun entitled "Parcels within 1 mile of Hamilton" and the control area around the Town of Middleburg is based on the map prepared by the County of Loudoun entitled "Town of Middleburg One Mile Subdivision Control Limit".
This data set was created from the City of Sacramento's subdivision maps. Contact GIS at: sacgis@cityofsacramento.org
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Property subdivision data sourced from Assessor records. This data is updated regularly.
Donation sent to the University of Idaho Library Government Documents Librarian a CD containing General Land Office maps on it. A readme file on the CD contains this information:"I obtained the attached GLO maps from Mitch Price at River Design Group who obtained them from another source. These maps apparently do not have a date, I assume it was stripped off when they were rectified. These maps show the Great Northern Rail line, it arrived in Bonners Ferry in 1892. The Spokane International Railroad (Union Pacific purchased this line) built a bridge across the Kootenai R. in 1906." "I am a bit puzzled on the map dates, the Kootenai River Master Plan indicated these maps are 1862-65 but they also show the Great Northern Rail line but not the Spokane International Railroad which seems to place them somewhere between 1892 - 1906 unless perhaps they were revised at a later date."Gary Barton USGS Tacoma, WA 253-552-1613 officegbarton@usgs.gov
Polygon file representing subdivision boundaries in Indianapolis and Marion County, Indiana.Data projection: NAD 1983 StatePlane Indiana East FIPS 1301 (US Feet)
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This feature class was created by exporting the Census County Subdivision polygon features from the 2020 TIGER/Line Geodatabase.TIGER Geodatabases are spatial extracts from the Census Bureau’s MAF/TIGER database. These files do not include demographic data, but they contain geographic entity codes that can be linked to the Census Bureau’s demographic data.
These boundaries are for planning purposes only and are not survey grade. For the most up-to-date assessing info, please contact the Town's Assessor. The respective Fiscal Year of publication is provided in the parcel pop-up info window. Years may vary from town to town.The parcels from each town on Martha's Vineyard are included in this web map. The map must be zoomed in far enough before the parcels will display on the map. The data are served out from MassGIS. All parcel data comply with the MassGIS Level 3 Parcel Data Standard.Each Town in Dukes County hires their own parcel data consultant to maintain their GIS parcel file. In most cases, this is done once a year. At the time of data compilation, the town Assessor exports a standard info file from their database which gets associated with each digital parcel. The Town's consultant pulls the parcel bounds and assessing info table into a spatial geodatabase which is then forwarded to MassGIS. MassGIS completes a few additional data management tasks and then serves out the data through their ArcGIS OnLine organizational website.The Martha's Vineyard Commission (MVC) then pulls that parcel data feature class into this web map and sets a few things such as visibility zoom extents and how the data display in the pop-up. The MVC does not edit these data in any way.Building Info Note: If there are multiple buildings on a parcel, the building info provided is only for one building on the parcel. Which building (i.e. largest, smallest, newest, oldest) is unknown. Parcels with Multiple Owners (i.e. Condo): If there are multiple owners on one parcel, when clicking on the pop-up you'll see the option to cycle through several records worth of assessing info.Understanding the Attributes: See the MassGIS Level 3 Parcel Data website for details.
Parcels and property data maintained and provided by Lee County Property Appraiser are converted to points. Property attribute data joined to parcel GIS layer by Lee County Government GIS. This dataset is generally used in spatial analysis.Process description: Parcel polygons, condominium points and property data provided by the Lee County Property Appraiser are processed by Lee County's GIS Department using the following steps:Join property data to parcel polygons Join property data to condo pointsConvert parcel polygons to points using ESRI's ArcGIS tool "Feature to Point" and designate the "Source" field "P".Load Condominium points into this layer and designate the "Source" field "C". Add X/Y coordinates in Florida State Plane West, NAD 83, feet using the "Add X/Y" tool.Projected coordinate system name: NAD_1983_StatePlane_Florida_West_FIPS_0902_FeetGeographic coordinate system name: GCS_North_American_1983
Name
Type
Length
Description
STRAP
String
25
17-digit Property ID (Section, Township, Range, Area, Block, Lot)
BLOCK
String
10
5-digit portion of STRAP (positions 9-13)
LOT
String
8
Last 4-digits of STRAP
FOLIOID
Double
8
Unique Property ID
MAINTDATE
Date
8
Date LeePA staff updated record
MAINTWHO
String
20
LeePA staff who updated record
UPDATED
Date
8
Data compilation date
HIDE_STRAP
String
1
Confidential parcel ownership
TRSPARCEL
String
17
Parcel ID sorted by Township, Range & Section
DORCODE
String
2
Department of Revenue. See https://leepa.org/Docs/Codes/DOR_Code_List.pdf
CONDOTYPE
String
1
Type of condominium: C (commercial) or R (residential)
UNITOFMEAS
String
2
Type of Unit of Measure (ex: AC=acre, LT=lot, FF=frontage in feet)
NUMUNITS
Double
8
Number of Land Units (units defined in UNITOFMEAS)
FRONTAGE
Integer
4
Road Frontage in Feet
DEPTH
Integer
4
Property Depth in Feet
GISACRES
Double
8
Total Computed Acres from GIS
TAXINGDIST
String
3
Taxing District of Property
TAXDISTDES
String
60
Taxing District Description
FIREDIST
String
3
Fire District of Property
FIREDISTDE
String
60
Fire District Description
ZONING
String
10
Zoning of Property
ZONINGAREA
String
3
Governing Area for Zoning
LANDUSECOD
SmallInteger
2
Land Use Code
LANDUSEDES
String
60
Land Use Description
LANDISON
String
5
BAY,CANAL,CREEK,GULF,LAKE,RIVER & GOLF
SITEADDR
String
55
Lee County Addressing/E911
SITENUMBER
String
10
Property Location - Street Number
SITESTREET
String
40
Street Name
SITEUNIT
String
5
Unit Number
SITECITY
String
20
City
SITEZIP
String
5
Zip Code
JUST
Double
8
Market Value
ASSESSED
Double
8
Building Value + Land Value
TAXABLE
Double
8
Taxable Value
LAND
Double
8
Land Value
BUILDING
Double
8
Building Value
LXFV
Double
8
Land Extra Feature Value
BXFV
Double
8
Building Extra Feature value
NEWBUILT
Double
8
New Construction Value
AGAMOUNT
Double
8
Agriculture Exemption Value
DISAMOUNT
Double
8
Disability Exemption Value
HISTAMOUNT
Double
8
Historical Exemption Value
HSTDAMOUNT
Double
8
Homestead Exemption Value
SNRAMOUNT
Double
8
Senior Exemption Value
WHLYAMOUNT
Double
8
Wholly Exemption Value
WIDAMOUNT
Double
8
Widow Exemption Value
WIDRAMOUNT
Double
8
Widower Exemption Value
BLDGCOUNT
SmallInteger
2
Total Number of Buildings on Parcel
MINBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Oldest Building Built
MAXBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Newest Building Built
TOTALAREA
Double
8
Total Building Area
HEATEDAREA
Double
8
Total Heated Area
MAXSTORIES
Double
8
Tallest Building on Parcel
BEDROOMS
Integer
4
Total Number of Bedrooms
BATHROOMS
Double
8
Total Number of Bathrooms / Not For Comm
GARAGE
String
1
Garage on Property 'Y'
CARPORT
String
1
Carport on Property 'Y'
POOL
String
1
Pool on Property 'Y'
BOATDOCK
String
1
Boat Dock on Property 'Y'
SEAWALL
String
1
Sea Wall on Property 'Y'
NBLDGCOUNT
SmallInteger
2
Total Number of New Buildings on ParcelTotal Number of New Buildings on Parcel
NMINBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Oldest New Building Built
NMAXBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Newest New Building Built
NTOTALAREA
Double
8
Total New Building Area
NHEATEDARE
Double
8
Total New Heated Area
NMAXSTORIE
Double
8
Tallest New Building on Parcel
NBEDROOMS
Integer
4
Total Number of New Bedrooms
NBATHROOMS
Double
8
Total Number of New Bathrooms/Not For Comm
NGARAGE
String
1
New Garage on Property 'Y'
NCARPORT
String
1
New Carport on Property 'Y'
NPOOL
String
1
New Pool on Property 'Y'
NBOATDOCK
String
1
New Boat Dock on Property 'Y'
NSEAWALL
String
1
New Sea Wall on Property 'Y'
O_NAME
String
30
Owner Name
O_OTHERS
String
120
Other Owners
O_CAREOF
String
30
In Care Of Line
O_ADDR1
String
30
Owner Mailing Address Line 1
O_ADDR2
String
30
Owner Mailing Address Line 2
O_CITY
String
30
Owner Mailing City
O_STATE
String
2
Owner Mailing State
O_ZIP
String
9
Owner Mailing Zip
O_COUNTRY
String
30
Owner Mailing Country
S_1DATE
Date
8
Most Current Sale Date > $100.00
S_1AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_1VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_1TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_1TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_1OR_NUM
String
13
Original Record (Lee County Clerk)
S_2DATE
Date
8
Previous Sale Date > $100.00
S_2AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_2VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_2TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_2TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_2OR_NUM
String
13
Original Record (Lee County Clerk)
S_3DATE
Date
8
Next Previous Sale Date > $100.00
S_3AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_3VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_3TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_3TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_3OR_NUM
String
13
Original Record (Lee County Clerk)
S_4DATE
Date
8
Next Previous Sale Date > $100.00
S_4AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_4VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_4TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_4TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_4OR_NUM
String
13
State of Alaska tax parcel data by authoritative data source. This map is for use within the Alaska Geospatial Council Cadastre Technical Working Group's Hub site.
https://gis.pima.gov/data/contents/metadet.cfm?name=pcgprsbm***Note: overlapping data is present, and attention needs to be paid to dates on the instruments. Any questions should be addressed to transsyseim@pima.gov.***
https://maps.islandcountywa.gov/WebFiles/DataDownloads/Metadata/Plats.htmlhttps://maps.islandcountywa.gov/WebFiles/DataDownloads/Metadata/Plats.html
Plat and condo boundaries for subdivisions and condominiums within Island County. Accuracy at the parcel level as boundaries are crated by merging parcels within the plat to create a boundary.
More MetadataSubdivisions are larger, whole tracts of land that are legally separated or broken down into smaller parcels through a recorded instrument at the County Court House. The subdivision layer is derived from the subdivision title as shown on recorded plats.The subdivision layer was created to allow subdivisions to be queried and categorized both for the general public and for various departments within Loudoun County government. It serves as tool to monitor the Loudoun County Subdivision Ordinance. The ordinance states a subdivision as being a "division of any parcel into two or more parcels, each separately transferable from the other, and shall include condominium development."These data were generated for use by Loudoun County and are available to the public. These data are intended for use at 1:2400 scale or smaller. Acknowledgement of Loudoun County would be appreciated in products derived from this data.
Subdivisions, Neighborhoods in Wake County, NC
Web App. Parcel map displaying Age of Housing, Residential Appraised Value and Land Use in St. Louis County, Missouri. Link to Metadata.
MassGIS Level 3 Parcel Data: Data Fiscal Year: Aquinnah 2019, Chilmark 2020, Edgartown 2021, Gosnold 2015, Oak Bluffs 2021, Tisbury 2021, West Tisbury 2021.Building Info Table: Acquired by MVC from Town Assessors in FY20.Downloaded from MassGIS,, this polygon file represents the parcel bounds for the 7 towns in Dukes County MA (Aquinnah, Chilmark, Edgartown, Godnold, Oak Bluffs, Tisbury, West Tisbury). Each town has their own parcel data consultant and then the data are forwarded to MassGIS for final processing. All data comply with the MassGIS Level 3 Parcel Data Standard. This file geodatabase only includes the TaxPar feature class and Assess table for each town. All TaxPar feature classes were appended into one feature class (Parcels_duk) by the MVC.Each assess table is utilized in that town's respective relationship join (1 to Many) for linking the parcel polygon to the related record(s) in the Assess table. The Assess Table contains info about ownership and assessed values. This is not a detailed building table. If there are multiple owners associated with a property, then the Assess table will have multiple records for that property/parcel (such as for condo parcels).Each building table is utilized in that town's respective relationship join (1 to Many) for linking the parcel polygon to the related record(s) in the Bldg table. The Bldg (building) table contains info about each building on the parcel (such as number of bedrooms, number of bathrooms, the living area square footage, etc.). NOTES of CAUTION: The Living Area Square Footage may not represent the exact same thing in each town. As a generalization, Living Area is interior space that is heated. Regarding West Tisbury, their building table only contains info for one building on the parcel. It is uncertain at this time if the info is the most recent, most primary, or some kind of summarization where multiple buildings on a parcel exist.The field of [assess_mYB] represents the Minimum/Earliest Year Built for any building on the parcel and is appended to the TaxPar feature class based on an analysis of the info provided in the building table. This field [assess_mYB] is utilized in the Historic Structures App found in ArcGIS OnLine.
Advisory Neighborhood Commissions (ANCs) were created pursuant to legislation approving the District of Columbia's Home Rule charter in 1973. They are collections of Single Member Districts (SMDs). ANCs allow input from an advisory board made up of the residents of the neighborhoods directly affected by government action. The ANCs are the body of government with the closest official ties to the people in a neighborhood. ANCs present their positions and recommendations on issues to various District government agencies, the Executive Branch, and the Council. They also present testimony to independent agencies, boards and commissions, usually under rules of procedure specific to those entities. By law, the ANCs may also present their positions to Federal agencies. ANCs consider a wide range of policies and programs affecting their neighborhoods. These include traffic, parking, recreation, street improvements, liquor licenses, zoning, economic development, police protection, sanitation and trash collection, and the District's annual budget. No public policy area is excluded from the purview of the Advisory Neighborhood Commissions. ANCs present their positions and recommendations on issues to various District government agencies, the Executive Branch, and the Council. They also present testimony to independent agencies, boards and commissions, usually under rules of procedure specific to those entities. By law, the ANCs may also present their positions to Federal agencies.This dataset reflects the ANC boundaries delineated in the Advisory Neighborhood Commission Boundaries Act of 2022, signed into law on June 16, 2022. They are in effect beginning January 1, 2023.
DOUGLAS COUNTY SURVEY/GISGIS PARCEL MAPPING GUIDELINES FOR PARCEL DISCREPANCIESIt is the intent of the Douglas County GIS Parcel Mapping to accurately identify the areas of land parcels to be valued and taxed 1. Discrepancies in areas• The Auditor/Assessor (tax) acreage areas started with the original US General Land Office (GLO) township plat maps created from the Public Land Survey (PLS) that was done between 1858 and 1871. The recovery of the PLS corners and the accurate location of these corners with GPS obtained coordinates has allowed for accurate section subdivisions, which results in accurate areas for parcels based on legal descriptions, which may be significantly different than the original areas. (See Example 2)• Any parcel bordering a meandered lake and/or a water boundary will likely have a disparity of area between the Auditor/Assessor acreages and the GIS acreages because of the inaccuracy of the original GLO meander lines from which the original areas were determined. Water lines are not able to be drafted to the same accuracy as the normal parcel lines. The water lines are usually just sketched on a survey and their dimensions are not generally given on a land record. The water boundaries of our GIS parcels are located from aerial photography. This is a subjective determination based on the interpretation by the Survey/GIS technician of what is water. Some lakes fluctuate significantly and the areas of all parcels bordering water are subject to constant change. In these cases the ordinary high water line (OHW) is attempted to be identified. Use of 2-foot contours will be made, if available. (See Example 1)• Some land records do not accurately report the area described in the land description and the description area is ignored. (See Example 3)• The parcel mapping has made every attempt to map the parcels based on available survey information as surveyed and located on the ground. This may conflict with some record legal descriptions.Solutions• If an actual survey by a licensed Land Surveyor is available, it will be utilized for the tax acreage.• If the Auditor/Assessor finds a discrepancy between the tax and GIS areas, they will request a review by the County Survey/GIS department.• As a starting guideline, the County Survey/GIS department will identify all parcels that differ in tax area versus GIS parcel area of 10 % or more and a difference of at least 5 acres. (This could be expanded later after the initial review.)• Each of these identified parcels will be reviewed individually by the County Survey/GIS department to determine the reason for the discrepancy and a recommendation will be made by the County Survey/GIS department to the Auditor/Assessor if the change should be made or not.• If a change is to be made to the tax area, a letter will be sent to the taxpayer informing them that their area will be changed during the next tax cycle, which could affect their property valuation. This letter will originate from the Auditor/Assessor with explanation from the County Survey/GIS department. 2. Gaps and Overlaps• Land descriptions for adjoining parcels sometimes overlap or leave a gap between them.o In these instances the Survey/GIS technician has to make a decision where to place this boundary. A number of circumstances are reviewed to facilitate this decision as these dilemmas are usually decided on a case by case basis. All effort will be made to not leave a gap, but sometimes this is not possible and the gap will be shown with “unknown” ownership. (Note: The County does not have the authority to change boundaries!)o Some of the circumstances reviewed are: Which parcel had the initial legal description? Does the physical occupation of the parcel line as shown on the air photo more closely fit one of the described parcels? Interpretation of the intent of the legal description. Is the legal description surveyable?Note: These overlaps will be shown on the GIS map with a dashed “survey line” and accompanying text for the line not used for the parcel boundary. 3. Parcel lines that do not match location of buildings Structures on parcels do not always lie within the boundaries of the parcel. This may be a circumstance of building without the benefit of a survey or of misinterpreting these boundaries. The parcel lines should be shown accurately as surveyed and/or described regardless of the location of structures on the ground. NOTE: The GIS mapping is not a survey, but is an interpretation of parcel boundaries predicated upon resources available to the County Survey/GIS department.Gary Stevenson Page 1 7/21/2017Example 1Example 2A Example 2B Example 3