14 datasets found
  1. a

    City of Los Angeles COVID-19 Cases Neighborhood Map Public View

    • remakela-lahub.opendata.arcgis.com
    • visionzero.geohub.lacity.org
    • +4more
    Updated Dec 16, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    DataLA (2020). City of Los Angeles COVID-19 Cases Neighborhood Map Public View [Dataset]. https://remakela-lahub.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/899deb8c64704ab3ab3d5da4c93c6182
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 16, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    DataLA
    Area covered
    Description

    The Mayor’s Office utilizes the most recent data to inform decisions about COVID-19 response and policies. The Los Angeles COVID-19 Neighborhood Map visualizes the cases and deaths across 139 neighborhoods in the city. It includes the same data used by the office to spot changes in infection trends in the city, and identify areas where testing resources should be deployed.Data Source:Data are provided on a weekly basis by the LA County Department of Public Health and prepared by the LA Mayor's Office Innovation Team. The data included in this map are on a one-week lag. That means the data shown here are reporting statistics gathered from one week ago. This map will be updated weekly on Mondays. Click on the maps to zoom in, get more details, and see the legends.

  2. a

    LA Times Neighborhood Boundaries

    • citysurvey-lacs.opendata.arcgis.com
    • geohub.lacity.org
    • +4more
    Updated Oct 7, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    DataLA (2016). LA Times Neighborhood Boundaries [Dataset]. https://citysurvey-lacs.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/lahub::la-times-neighborhood-boundaries
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 7, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    DataLA
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    Description: The neighborhoods shown in this dataset are derived from a larger dataset drawn and maintained by the Data Desk, a team of Times reporters and Web developers in downtown L.A. The boundaries have expanded and shifted over time and now cover all of Los Angeles County broken down into 272 neighborhoods.This version of the LA Times boundaries only includes neighborhoods fully or partially within the City of Los Angeles. Neighborhoods that extend into other cities have been clipped to only show the portion(s) of the neighborhoods that are within the City of Los Angeles.Data Source: Los Angeles Times' Mapping LA project.Last Updated: October 7, 2016Refresh Rate: Never - Historical data (Note: should the LA Times update their Mapping LA project with new boundaries in the future, a new LA-specific layer will be added to the GeoHub as well.)

  3. l

    Los Angeles County Substructure Maps

    • data.lacounty.gov
    • geohub.lacity.org
    • +2more
    Updated Jul 10, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Los Angeles (2019). Los Angeles County Substructure Maps [Dataset]. https://data.lacounty.gov/maps/59ef5776954447b2bce593191220a98a
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 10, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Los Angeles
    Area covered
    Description

    This website provides a limited number of Substructure Maps in “pdf” format via GIS polygons representing grids containing URL links. Across various areas of Los Angeles County, paper maps were created by Public Works (PW) and its predecessor Departments to show underground utilities such as cable TV, gas, oil, and telephone lines.

    Though most of these maps are no longer updated, they can be useful as a research resource. Every reasonable effort has been made to assure the accuracy of this data and the maps referenced. Some cities may provide substructure information for the areas not covered by these grids. Additional and more accurate substructure data and information may also be obtained through the utility companies. Before digging, it is strongly advised to contact the Underground Service Alert (DigAlert Express) at www.digalert.org/digexpress.html or by calling 811.

    Please note that California State Law Says, You Must Contact DigAlert!

    The County of Los Angeles makes no warranty, representation, or guarantee as to the content, sequence, accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided herein or of any maps referenced. Los Angeles County Public Works recommends that all utility research be conducted under the supervision of a licensed civil engineer.

  4. l

    Redlining in Los Angeles (HOLC data)

    • geohub.lacity.org
    • visionzero.geohub.lacity.org
    • +3more
    Updated Feb 8, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Los Angeles Hub (2021). Redlining in Los Angeles (HOLC data) [Dataset]. https://geohub.lacity.org/maps/e3d61a2880e949cb896f5fd8bee4f6df
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 8, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Los Angeles Hub
    Area covered
    Description

    The practice of redlining was codified by a series of maps created as part of the New Deal by the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation, which evaluated the mortgage lending risk of neighborhoods.

  5. a

    Planning Areas (LA County Planning)

    • egis-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com
    • data.lacounty.gov
    • +4more
    Updated May 28, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Los Angeles (2020). Planning Areas (LA County Planning) [Dataset]. https://egis-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/26fe6b7e70ec41b285d9f5517abd611a
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 28, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Los Angeles
    Area covered
    Description

    Countywide layer which divides the County of Los Angeles into 11 unique areas for planning purposes of the unincorporated areas. This layer is referred to as 'DRP Planning Areas.'The General Plan provides goals and policies to achieve countywide planning objectives for the unincorporated areas, and serves as the foundation for all community-based plans, such as area plans, community plans, and coastal land use plans. Area plans focus on land use and policy issues that are specific to the Planning Area. Community plans cover smaller geographic areas within the Planning Area, and address neighborhood and/or community-level policy issues. Coastal land use plans are components of local coastal programs, and regulate land use and establish policies to guide development in the coastal zone. Please refer to the Planning Areas Framework chapter in the General Plan here.UPDATED: 6/20/24 - following the adoption of the East San Gabriel Valley Area Plan, the boundary between this planning area and the West San Gabriel Valley was modified to include three new unincorporated communities (North Whittier, Pellissier Village, and South El Monte).NEED MORE FUNCTIONALITY? If you are looking for more layers or advanced tools and functionality, then try our suite of GIS Web Mapping Applications.

  6. l

    Los Angeles Index of Neighborhood Change

    • geohub.lacity.org
    • visionzero.geohub.lacity.org
    • +4more
    Updated Oct 13, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    DataLA (2016). Los Angeles Index of Neighborhood Change [Dataset]. https://geohub.lacity.org/items/57e9231c3bd34d44ae49b309b0cb440e
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 13, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    DataLA
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    The Los Angeles Index of Neighborhood Change is a tool that allows users to explore the extent to which Los Angeles Zip Codes have undergone demographic change from 2000 to 2014. Created in 2015/2016, the data comes from 2000, 2005, 2013, and 2014. Please read details about each measure for exact years.Index scores are an aggregate of six demographic measures indicative of gentrification. The measures are standardized and combined using weights that reflect the proportion of each measure that is statistically significant.Measure 1: Percent change in low/high IRS filer ratio. For the purposes of this measure, High Income = >$75K Adjust Gross Income tax filer and Low Income = <$25k filers who also received an earned income tax credit. Years Compared for Measure 1: 2005 and 2013 | Source: IRS Income Tax Return DataMeasure 2: Change in percent of residents 25 years or older with Bachelor's Degrees or HigherMeasure 3: Change in percent of White, non-Hispanic/Latino residentsMeasure 4: Percent change in median household income (2000 income is adjusted to 2014 dollars)Measure 5: % Change in median gross rent (2000 rent is adjusted to 2013/2014 dollars)Measure 6: Percent change in average household size Year Compared for Measures 2-5: 2000 and 2014, Measure 6: 2013Sources: Decennial Census, 2000 | American Community Survey (5-Year Estimate, 2009-2013; 2010; 2014)Date Updated: December 13, 2016Refresh Rate: Never - Historical data

  7. a

    Los Angeles County Substructure Utility Lines

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • data.lacounty.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Jan 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Los Angeles (2025). Los Angeles County Substructure Utility Lines [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/4d53d2df747e4aa784773370dc2375a3
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 15, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Los Angeles
    Area covered
    Description

    The polylines represent underground utilities such as cable TV, gas, oil, and telephone lines across various areas of Los Angeles County. All data were collected from LA County Substructure Grid Maps drawing. The utility lines are from cities that were contracted with LA County. To download the hardcopy maps, please visit: Los Angeles County Substructure Maps | County of Los Angeles Open Datahttps://egis-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com/maps/los-angeles-county-substructure-maps-1/explore?location=34.094631%2C-118.256950%2C7.82Every reasonable effort has been made to assure the accuracy of this data and the maps referenced. Some cities may provide substructure information for the areas not covered by our map grids. Additional and more accurate substructure data and information may also be obtained through the utility companies. The County of Los Angeles makes no warranty, representation, or guarantee as to the content, sequence, accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided herein or of any maps referenced. Los Angeles County Public Works recommends that all utility research be conducted under the supervision of a licensed civil engineer.

  8. d

    Preliminary soil-slip susceptibility maps, southwestern California

    • search.dataone.org
    • data.doi.gov
    Updated Oct 29, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Douglas M. Morton; Rachel M.H. Alvarez; Russell H. Campbell (2016). Preliminary soil-slip susceptibility maps, southwestern California [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/3a90000e-e764-4779-ac1c-6d61b120a095
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 29, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    Douglas M. Morton; Rachel M.H. Alvarez; Russell H. Campbell
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    suscode
    Description

    This data set maps the soil-slip susceptibility for several areas in southwestern California. Created using Environmental Systems Research Institute's ARC/INFO software, the data base consists of raster maps containing grid cells coded with soil- slip susceptibility values. In addition, the data set includes the following graphic and text products: (1) postscript graphic plot files containing the soil-slip susceptibility map, topography, cultural data, and a key of the colored map units, and (2) PDF and text files of the Readme (including the metadata file as an appendix) and accompanying text, and a PDF file of the plot files. Intense winter rains commonly generated debris flows in upland areas of southwestern California. These debris flows initiate as small landslides referred to as soil slips. Most of the soil slips mobilize into debris flows that travel down slope at varying speeds and distances. The debris flows can be a serious hazard to people and structures in their paths. The soil-slip susceptibility maps identify those natural slopes most likely to be the sites of soil slips during periods of intense winter rainfall. The maps were largely derived by extrapolation of debris-flow inventory data collected from selected areas of southwestern California. Based on spatial analyses of soil slips, three factors in addition to rainfall, were found to be most important in the origin of soil slips. These factors are geology, slope, and aspect. Geology, by far the most important factor, was derived from existing geologic maps. Slope and aspect data were obtained from 10-meter digital elevation models (DEM). Soil-slip susceptibility maps at a scale of 1:24,000 were derived from combining numerical values for geology, slope, and aspect on a 10-meter cell size for 128 7.5' quadrangles and assembled on 1:100,000-scale topographic maps. The resultant maps of relative soil-slip susceptibility represent the best estimate generated from available debris-flow inventory maps and DEM data.

  9. l

    Santa Monica Mountains and Griffith Park Linkage - SEA - Raster

    • geohub.lacity.org
    • hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Jan 7, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    LA Sanitation (2021). Santa Monica Mountains and Griffith Park Linkage - SEA - Raster [Dataset]. https://geohub.lacity.org/maps/labos::santa-monica-mountains-and-griffith-park-linkage-sea-raster/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 7, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    LA Sanitation
    Area covered
    Description

    The L.A. County's Significant Ecological Areas dataset has been clipped to the Santa Monica Mountains Griffith Park Linkage Analysis study area. Significant Ecological Area (SEA) means an area that is determined to possess an example of biotic resources that cumulatively represent biological diversity for the purposes of protecting biotic diversity, as part of the Los Angeles County General Plan or a city’s general plan. Additional regulations shall be applied based on County Code 22.56.215: 'Significant Ecological Areas — Additional Regulations'. More information about the County’s SEA Program can be found at: https://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/

  10. a

    Significant Ecological Area (SEA)

    • egis-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com
    • geohub.lacity.org
    • +2more
    Updated Jan 17, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Los Angeles (2019). Significant Ecological Area (SEA) [Dataset]. https://egis-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/c01bf32eee6d4768ac0a82470c810648
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 17, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Los Angeles
    Area covered
    Description

    Significant Ecological Area (SEA) means an area that is determined to possess an example of biotic resources that cumulatively represent biological diversity for the purposes of protecting biotic diversity, as part of the Los Angeles County General Plan or a city’s general plan. Additional regulations shall be applied based on County Code 22.56.215: 'Significant Ecological Areas — Additional Regulations'. More information about the County’s SEA Program can be found at: https://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/LAST UPDATED: 12/20/22 for Annexation #2021-01 (Tesoro Del Valle)NEED MORE FUNCTIONALITY? If you are looking for more layers or advanced tools and functionality, then try our suite of GIS Web Mapping Applications.

  11. a

    LUP - Area Community Plans

    • egis-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com
    • geohub.lacity.org
    • +2more
    Updated Dec 23, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Los Angeles (2019). LUP - Area Community Plans [Dataset]. https://egis-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com/content/23de639fd57940f4986d6de206f8ec07
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 23, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Los Angeles
    Description

    Land Use Policy as created by the various Area / Community / Coastal / Neighborhood Plans in the UNINCORPORATED County. For more information about the various plans, please click here. This is the Grouped Layer File (.lyr) that can be used in ArcGIS to symbolize all the colors of the various plans within this layer. Please note that this does not have the GIS data attached to it. If you want the actual GIS data layer, please be sure to download that from our Hub here. Once you download the .lyr file, it will show broken links, so you will need to map it to where you download the Area / Community Plan LUP dataset. Please see these instructions for ArcMap for an easy way to 'repair broken links.'LAST UPDATED: 03/10/23 - updated the Florence-Firestone TOD Specific Plan.

  12. a

    Countywide Statistical Areas Viewer

    • egis-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com
    • data.lacounty.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Apr 8, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Los Angeles (2024). Countywide Statistical Areas Viewer [Dataset]. https://egis-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com/maps/15faec34673c4314b620e6dd7d5107ca
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 8, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Los Angeles
    Area covered
    Description

    An interactive webmap on the eGIS Demography Hub Site allows users to view and explore Countywide Statistical Areas.

  13. Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) Neighborhood Redlining Grade

    • gis-for-racialequity.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jul 23, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Urban Observatory by Esri (2020). Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) Neighborhood Redlining Grade [Dataset]. https://gis-for-racialequity.hub.arcgis.com/maps/063cdb28dd3a449b92bc04f904256f62
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 23, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Authors
    Urban Observatory by Esri
    Area covered
    Description

    The Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) was created in the New Deal Era and trained many home appraisers in the 1930s. The HOLC created a neighborhood ranking system infamously known today as redlining. Local real estate developers and appraisers in over 200 cities assigned grades to residential neighborhoods. These maps and neighborhood ratings set the rules for decades of real estate practices. The grades ranged from A to D. A was traditionally colored in green, B was traditionally colored in blue, C was traditionally colored in yellow, and D was traditionally colored in red. A (Best): Always upper- or upper-middle-class White neighborhoods that HOLC defined as posing minimal risk for banks and other mortgage lenders, as they were "ethnically homogeneous" and had room to be further developed.B (Still Desirable): Generally nearly or completely White, U.S. -born neighborhoods that HOLC defined as "still desirable" and sound investments for mortgage lenders.C (Declining): Areas where the residents were often working-class and/or first or second generation immigrants from Europe. These areas often lacked utilities and were characterized by older building stock.D (Hazardous): Areas here often received this grade because they were "infiltrated" with "undesirable populations" such as Jewish, Asian, Mexican, and Black families. These areas were more likely to be close to industrial areas and to have older housing.Banks received federal backing to lend money for mortgages based on these grades. Many banks simply refused to lend to areas with the lowest grade, making it impossible for people in many areas to become homeowners. While this type of neighborhood classification is no longer legal thanks to the Fair Housing Act of 1968 (which was passed in large part due to the activism and work of the NAACP and other groups), the effects of disinvestment due to redlining are still observable today. For example, the health and wealth of neighborhoods in Chicago today can be traced back to redlining (Chicago Tribune). In addition to formerly redlined neighborhoods having fewer resources such as quality schools, access to fresh foods, and health care facilities, new research from the Science Museum of Virginia finds a link between urban heat islands and redlining (Hoffman, et al., 2020). This layer comes out of that work, specifically from University of Richmond's Digital Scholarship Lab. More information on sources and digitization process can be found on the Data and Download and About pages. NOTE: This map has been updated as of 1/16/24 to use a newer version of the data layer which contains more cities than it previously did. As mentioned above, over 200 cities were redlined and therefore this is not a complete dataset of every city that experienced redlining by the HOLC in the 1930s. Map opens in Sacramento, CA. Use bookmarks or the search bar to get to other cities.Cities included in this mapAlabama: Birmingham, Mobile, MontgomeryArizona: PhoenixArkansas: Arkadelphia, Batesville, Camden, Conway, El Dorado, Fort Smith, Little Rock, Russellville, TexarkanaCalifornia: Fresno, Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, StocktonColorado: Boulder, Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, Fort Morgan, Grand Junction, Greeley, Longmont, PuebloConnecticut: Bridgeport and Fairfield; Hartford; New Britain; New Haven; Stamford, Darien, and New Canaan; WaterburyFlorida: Crestview, Daytona Beach, DeFuniak Springs, DeLand, Jacksonville, Miami, New Smyrna, Orlando, Pensacola, St. Petersburg, TampaGeorgia: Atlanta, Augusta, Columbus, Macon, SavannahIowa: Boone, Cedar Rapids, Council Bluffs, Davenport, Des Moines, Dubuque, Sioux City, WaterlooIllinois: Aurora, Chicago, Decatur, East St. Louis, Joliet, Peoria, Rockford, SpringfieldIndiana: Evansville, Fort Wayne, Indianapolis, Lake County Gary, Muncie, South Bend, Terre HauteKansas: Atchison, Greater Kansas City, Junction City, Topeka, WichitaKentucky: Covington, Lexington, LouisvilleLouisiana: New Orleans, ShreveportMaine: Augusta, Boothbay, Portland, Sanford, WatervilleMaryland: BaltimoreMassachusetts: Arlington, Belmont, Boston, Braintree, Brockton, Brookline, Cambridge, Chelsea, Dedham, Everett, Fall River, Fitchburg, Haverhill, Holyoke Chicopee, Lawrence, Lexington, Lowell, Lynn, Malden, Medford, Melrose, Milton, Needham, New Bedford, Newton, Pittsfield, Quincy, Revere, Salem, Saugus, Somerville, Springfield, Waltham, Watertown, Winchester, Winthrop, WorcesterMichigan: Battle Creek, Bay City, Detroit, Flint, Grand Rapids, Jackson, Kalamazoo, Lansing, Muskegon, Pontiac, Saginaw, ToledoMinnesota: Austin, Duluth, Mankato, Minneapolis, Rochester, Staples, St. Cloud, St. PaulMississippi: JacksonMissouri: Cape Girardeau, Carthage, Greater Kansas City, Joplin, Springfield, St. Joseph, St. LouisNorth Carolina: Asheville, Charlotte, Durham, Elizabeth City, Fayetteville, Goldsboro, Greensboro, Hendersonville, High Point, New Bern, Rocky Mount, Statesville, Winston-SalemNorth Dakota: Fargo, Grand Forks, Minot, WillistonNebraska: Lincoln, OmahaNew Hampshire: ManchesterNew Jersey: Atlantic City, Bergen County, Camden, Essex County, Monmouth, Passaic County, Perth Amboy, Trenton, Union CountyNew York: Albany, Binghamton/Johnson City, Bronx, Brooklyn, Buffalo, Elmira, Jamestown, Lower Westchester County, Manhattan, Niagara Falls, Poughkeepsie, Queens, Rochester, Schenectady, Staten Island, Syracuse, Troy, UticaOhio: Akron, Canton, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton, Hamilton, Lima, Lorain, Portsmouth, Springfield, Toledo, Warren, YoungstownOklahoma: Ada, Alva, Enid, Miami Ottawa County, Muskogee, Norman, Oklahoma City, South McAlester, TulsaOregon: PortlandPennsylvania: Allentown, Altoona, Bethlehem, Chester, Erie, Harrisburg, Johnstown, Lancaster, McKeesport, New Castle, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Wilkes-Barre, YorkRhode Island: Pawtucket & Central Falls, Providence, WoonsocketSouth Carolina: Aiken, Charleston, Columbia, Greater Anderson, Greater Greensville, Orangeburg, Rock Hill, Spartanburg, SumterSouth Dakota: Aberdeen, Huron, Milbank, Mitchell, Rapid City, Sioux Falls, Vermillion, WatertownTennessee: Chattanooga, Elizabethton, Erwin, Greenville, Johnson City, Knoxville, Memphis, NashvilleTexas: Amarillo, Austin, Beaumont, Dallas, El Paso, Forth Worth, Galveston, Houston, Port Arthur, San Antonio, Waco, Wichita FallsUtah: Ogden, Salt Lake CityVirginia: Bristol, Danville, Harrisonburg, Lynchburg, Newport News, Norfolk, Petersburg, Phoebus, Richmond, Roanoke, StauntonVermont: Bennington, Brattleboro, Burlington, Montpelier, Newport City, Poultney, Rutland, Springfield, St. Albans, St. Johnsbury, WindsorWashington: Seattle, Spokane, TacomaWisconsin: Kenosha, Madison, Milwaukee County, Oshkosh, RacineWest Virginia: Charleston, Huntington, WheelingAn example of a map produced by the HOLC of Philadelphia:

  14. Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) Neighborhood Redlining Grade

    • sal-urichmond.hub.arcgis.com
    • vaccine-confidence-program-cdcvax.hub.arcgis.com
    • +3more
    Updated Jun 24, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Urban Observatory by Esri (2020). Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) Neighborhood Redlining Grade [Dataset]. https://sal-urichmond.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/UrbanObservatory::home-owners-loan-corporation-holc-neighborhood-redlining-grade
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 24, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Authors
    Urban Observatory by Esri
    Area covered
    Description

    There is a newer and more authoritative version of this layer here! It is owned by the University of Richmond's Digital Scholarship Lab and contains data on many more cities.The Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) was created in the New Deal Era and trained many home appraisers in the 1930s. The HOLC created a neighborhood ranking system infamously known today as redlining. Local real estate developers and appraisers in over 200 cities assigned grades to residential neighborhoods. These maps and neighborhood ratings set the rules for decades of real estate practices. The grades ranged from A to D. A was traditionally colored in green, B was traditionally colored in blue, C was traditionally colored in yellow, and D was traditionally colored in red. A (Best): Always upper- or upper-middle-class White neighborhoods that HOLC defined as posing minimal risk for banks and other mortgage lenders, as they were "ethnically homogeneous" and had room to be further developed.B (Still Desirable): Generally nearly or completely White, U.S. -born neighborhoods that HOLC defined as "still desirable" and sound investments for mortgage lenders.C (Declining): Areas where the residents were often working-class and/or first or second generation immigrants from Europe. These areas often lacked utilities and were characterized by older building stock.D (Hazardous): Areas here often received this grade because they were "infiltrated" with "undesirable populations" such as Jewish, Asian, Mexican, and Black families. These areas were more likely to be close to industrial areas and to have older housing.Banks received federal backing to lend money for mortgages based on these grades. Many banks simply refused to lend to areas with the lowest grade, making it impossible for people in many areas to become homeowners. While this type of neighborhood classification is no longer legal thanks to the Fair Housing Act of 1968 (which was passed in large part due to the activism and work of the NAACP and other groups), the effects of disinvestment due to redlining are still observable today. For example, the health and wealth of neighborhoods in Chicago today can be traced back to redlining (Chicago Tribune). In addition to formerly redlined neighborhoods having fewer resources such as quality schools, access to fresh foods, and health care facilities, new research from the Science Museum of Virginia finds a link between urban heat islands and redlining (Hoffman, et al., 2020). This layer comes out of that work, specifically from University of Richmond's Digital Scholarship Lab. More information on sources and digitization process can be found on the Data and Download and About pages. This layer includes 7,148 neighborhoods spanning 143 cities across the continental United States. NOTE: As mentioned above, over 200 cities were redlined and therefore this is not a complete dataset of every city that experienced redlining by the HOLC in the 1930s. More cities are available in this feature layer from University of Richmond.Cities included in this layerAlabama: Birmingham, Mobile, MontgomeryCalifornia: Fresno, Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, StocktonColorado: DenverConnecticut: East Hartford, New Britain, New Haven, StamfordFlorida: Jacksonville, Miami, St. Petersburg, TampaGeorgia: Atlanta, Augusta, Chattanooga, Columbus, MaconIllinois: Aurora, Chicago, Decatur, Joliet, GaryIndiana: Evansville, Fort Wayne, Indianapolis, Gary, Muncie, South Bend, Terre HauteKansas: Greater Kansas City, WichitaKentucky: Lexington, LouisvilleLouisiana: New OrleansMassachusetts: Arlington, Belmont, Boston, Braintree, Brockton, Brookline, Cambridge, Chelsea, Dedham, Everett, Haverhill, Holyoke Chicopee, Lexington, Malden, Medford, Melrose, Milton, Needham, Newton, Quincy, Revere, Saugus, Somerville, Waltham, Watertown, Winchester, WinthropMaryland: BaltimoreMichigan: Battle Creek, Bay City, Detroit, Flint, Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, Muskegon, Pontiac, Saginaw, ToledoMinnesota: Duluth, MinneapolisMissouri: Greater Kansas City, Springfield, St. Joseph, St. LouisNorth Carolina: Asheville, Charlotte, Durham, Greensboro, Winston SalemNew Hampshire: ManchesterNew Jersey: Atlantic City, Bergen Co., Camden, Essex County, Hudson County, TrentonNew York: Bronx, Brooklyn, Buffalo, Elmira, Binghamton/Johnson City, Lower Westchester Co., Manhattan, Niagara Falls, Poughkeepsie, Queens, Rochester, Staten Island, Syracuse, UticaOhio: Akron, Canton, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton, Hamilton, Lima, Lorrain, Portsmouth, Springfield, Toledo, Warren, YoungstownOregon: PortlandPennsylvania: Altoona, Erie, Johnstown, New Castle, Philadelphia, PittsburghSouth Carolina: AugustaTennessee: Chattanooga, KnoxvilleTexas: DallasVirginia: Lynchburg, Norfolk, Richmond, RoanokeWashington: Seattle, Spokane, TacomaWisconsin: Kenosha, Milwaukee, Oshkosh, RacineWest Virginia: Charleston, WheelingAn example of a map produced by the HOLC of Philadelphia:

  15. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
DataLA (2020). City of Los Angeles COVID-19 Cases Neighborhood Map Public View [Dataset]. https://remakela-lahub.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/899deb8c64704ab3ab3d5da4c93c6182

City of Los Angeles COVID-19 Cases Neighborhood Map Public View

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Dec 16, 2020
Dataset authored and provided by
DataLA
Area covered
Description

The Mayor’s Office utilizes the most recent data to inform decisions about COVID-19 response and policies. The Los Angeles COVID-19 Neighborhood Map visualizes the cases and deaths across 139 neighborhoods in the city. It includes the same data used by the office to spot changes in infection trends in the city, and identify areas where testing resources should be deployed.Data Source:Data are provided on a weekly basis by the LA County Department of Public Health and prepared by the LA Mayor's Office Innovation Team. The data included in this map are on a one-week lag. That means the data shown here are reporting statistics gathered from one week ago. This map will be updated weekly on Mondays. Click on the maps to zoom in, get more details, and see the legends.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu