8 datasets found
  1. a

    Summit County Parcels

    • uplan.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 4, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    UPlan Map Center (2022). Summit County Parcels [Dataset]. https://uplan.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/uplan::sr-224-wildlife-signs-20220504?layer=2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 4, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    UPlan Map Center
    Area covered
    Description

    "Database containing parcel boundary, parcel identifier, parcel address, owner type, and county recorder contact information" - HB113. The intent of the bill was to not include any attributes that the counties rely on for data sales. If you want other attributes associated with the parcels you need to contact the county recorder.Users should be aware the owner type field 'OWN_TYPE' in the parcel polygons is a very generalized ownership type (Federal, Private, State, Tribal). It is populated with the value of the 'OWNER' field where the parcel's centroid intersects the CADASTRE.LandOwnership polygon layer.This dataset is a snapshot in time and may not be the most current. For the most current data contact the county recorder.Last Update: Jan., 2019

  2. a

    Tax Parcel Viewer

    • understanding-property-value-summitgis.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jul 8, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Summit GIS (2019). Tax Parcel Viewer [Dataset]. https://understanding-property-value-summitgis.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/tax-parcel-viewer
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 8, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Summit GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    A map used in the Floodplain Inquiry application to locate parcels impacted by FEMA floodplain boundaries.UNDER REVIEW 3/22/2024 GIS TEAM

  3. a

    Sewer Lines

    • data-summitgis.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Oct 9, 2014
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Summit GIS (2014). Sewer Lines [Dataset]. https://data-summitgis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/summitgis::sewer-lines/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 9, 2014
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Summit GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    All sewer lines that make up DOES sewer system and include three type: Gravity Force Main Vacuum Found under the "Type" field

  4. a

    SchoolDistricts public

    • understanding-property-value-summitgis.hub.arcgis.com
    • napsg.hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Jul 8, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Summit GIS (2019). SchoolDistricts public [Dataset]. https://understanding-property-value-summitgis.hub.arcgis.com/maps/7049442c6de74b608f3972f35bbc81f4
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 8, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Summit GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    A public view of the geographic extent of a school district or attendance zone and educational facilities.

  5. H

    Future WRMA's Land Use Dataset

    • hydroshare.org
    • search.dataone.org
    zip
    Updated Jan 5, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Enjie Li (2017). Future WRMA's Land Use Dataset [Dataset]. https://www.hydroshare.org/resource/71e9164eb57a4e32b58ad6bbe831b3f6
    Explore at:
    zip(12.8 MB)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 5, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    HydroShare
    Authors
    Enjie Li
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2014 - Dec 31, 2040
    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset contains the urban growth simulation results of future land use in 2040 of the Wasatch Range Metropolitan Area (WRMA) .In this study, we defined the WRMA as a broad, ten-county region that surrounds the Wasatch Mountain Range east of the Great Salt Lake and Salt Lake City in Utah. This region encompasses four Wasatch Front counties west of the mountain range (Weber County, Davis County, Salt Lake County, and Utah County), three Wasatch Back counties east of the mountain range (Morgan County, Summit County, and Wasatch County), and three counties neighboring the Wasatch Front (Cache County, Box Elder County, and Tooele County).

    SLEUTH-3r urban growth simulation model is used to generate this dataset. Detailed SLEUTH model protocol can be found at: http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/gig/index.html. The data used to run the SLEUTH-3r model include National Land Cover Database 2001, 2006, and 2011, US Census TIGER/Line shapefile for 2000 and 2011, United States Geological Survey 7.5 min elevation model, and Utah Landownership map from Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center.

    Three alternative scenarios were developed to explore how conserving Utah’s agriculturale land and maintaining healthy watersheds would affect the patterns and trajectories of urban development: 1) The first scenario is a “Business as Usual” scenario. In this scenario, federal, state, and local parks, conservation easement areas, and surface water bodies, were completely excluded (value = 100) from development, and all the remaining lands are were naively assumed as developable (value = 0). This is the same excluded layer that was also used during model calibration. Under this scenario, we hypothesized that future urban grow will occur following the historical growth behaviors and trajectories and no changes in land designation or policies to restrict future growth will be implemented. 2) The second scenario is an “Agricultural Conservation” scenario. Within the developable areas that we identified earlier, we then identified places that are classified by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) as prime farmland, unique farmland, farmland of statewide importance, farmland of local importance, prime farmland if irrigated, and prime farmland if irrigated and drained. Each of these classes were assigned with an exclusion value from urban development of 100, 80, 70, 60, 50, and 40 respectively. These exclusion values reflect the relative importance of each farmland classification and preservation priorities. By doing so, the model discourages but does not totally eliminate growth from occurring on agricultural lands, which reflects a general policy position to conserve agricultural landscapes while respecting landowners’ rights to sell private property. 3) A “Healthy Watershed” scenario aims to direct urban growth away from areas prone to flooding and areas critical for maintaining healthy watersheds. First, we made a 200-meter buffer around existing surface water bodies and wetlands and assigned these areas an exclusion value of 100 to keep growth from occurring there. In addition, we assigned areas that have frequent, occasional, rare and no-recorded flooding events with exclusion values of 100, 70, 40 and 0 accordingly. We also incorporated the critical watershed restoration areas identified by the Watershed Restoration Initiative of Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (https://wri.utah.gov/wri/) into this scenario. These watershed restoration areas are priority places for improving water quality and yield, reducing catastrophic wildfires, restoring the structure and function of watersheds following wildfire, and increasing habitat for wildlife populations and forage for sustainable agriculture. However, there are not yet legal provisions for protecting them from urbanization, so we assigned these areas a value of 70 to explore the potential urban expansion outcomes if growth were encouraged elsewhere.

    Future land use projections of 2040 are in GIF format, which can be reprojected and georeferenced in ArcGIS or QGIS, or be read directly as a picture.

  6. a

    Residential Comp Finder

    • understanding-property-value-summitgis.hub.arcgis.com
    • new-brunswick-assessment-esrica-atl-demo.hub.arcgis.com
    • +3more
    Updated Jul 8, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Summit GIS (2019). Residential Comp Finder [Dataset]. https://understanding-property-value-summitgis.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/residential-comp-finder-1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 8, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Summit GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    A map used in the Residential Comp Finder application to find comparable sales and related property information.

  7. a

    Region 2 - UDOT Projects

    • uplan.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jan 4, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    UPlan Map Center (2024). Region 2 - UDOT Projects [Dataset]. https://uplan.hub.arcgis.com/maps/1fc716333b424c6c8dec354a23b92e72
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 4, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    UPlan Map Center
    Area covered
    Description

    Region 2 - UDOT Projects web map used in UDOT Projects - Region 2 Experience Builder web app.Layers include Mile Point Linear Measure, UDOT Routes, Tooele County Parcels, Salt Lake County Parcels, Summit County Parcels, UDOT Regions, Statewide Plan Sheet Mosaic, World Imagery, and UDOT Right of Way parcels, Statewide Plan Sheet Mosaic, reference layers, et.al. UDOT ePM project data layers include All Projects, Studies, Planned, In design, Under Construction, Substantially Complete, and Finished.Please contact UDOT Region 2 GIS for more information.

  8. a

    21 7 Detailed Soils Evalution map January 2017

    • chatham-county-planning-subdivisions-and-rezonings-chathamncgis.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 5, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Chatham County GIS Portal (2025). 21 7 Detailed Soils Evalution map January 2017 [Dataset]. https://chatham-county-planning-subdivisions-and-rezonings-chathamncgis.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/21-7-detailed-soils-evalution-map-january-2017
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 5, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Chatham County GIS Portal
    Description

    Attachment regarding request by Brad Haertling, P.E. of American Engineering on behalf of Contentnea Creek Development Co. for Subdivision First Plat review and approval of Summit Terrace, consisting of 26 lots on 56.15 acres, located off Mt. Gilead Church Rd (S.R.1700), Parcel 19355.

  9. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
UPlan Map Center (2022). Summit County Parcels [Dataset]. https://uplan.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/uplan::sr-224-wildlife-signs-20220504?layer=2

Summit County Parcels

Explore at:
Dataset updated
May 4, 2022
Dataset authored and provided by
UPlan Map Center
Area covered
Description

"Database containing parcel boundary, parcel identifier, parcel address, owner type, and county recorder contact information" - HB113. The intent of the bill was to not include any attributes that the counties rely on for data sales. If you want other attributes associated with the parcels you need to contact the county recorder.Users should be aware the owner type field 'OWN_TYPE' in the parcel polygons is a very generalized ownership type (Federal, Private, State, Tribal). It is populated with the value of the 'OWNER' field where the parcel's centroid intersects the CADASTRE.LandOwnership polygon layer.This dataset is a snapshot in time and may not be the most current. For the most current data contact the county recorder.Last Update: Jan., 2019

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu