The Surface Water Data Viewer (SWDV) is a DNR data delivery system that provides interactive web mapping tools for a wide variety of datasets including chemistry (water, sediment), physical and biological (macro-invertebrate, fish) data.Contact information for help with the Surface Water Data Viewer, email:DNRSWDV@wisconsin.gov

The King County Groundwater Protection Program maintains a database of groundwater wells, water quality and water level sampling data. Users may search the database using Quick or Advanced Search OR use King County Groundwater iMap map set. The viewer provides a searchable map interface for locating groundwater well data.

This interactive mapping application provides access to water-related data for Texas. The viewer contains several GIS datasets relating to water resources, including TWDB groundwater data, brackish groundwater data, and data from the Submitted Driller's Reports Database.

Since 2002, NASA’s GRACE Satellite mission has allowed scientists of various disciplines to analyze and map the changes in Earth’s total water storage on a global scale. Although the raw data is available to the public, the process of viewing, manipulating, and analyzing the GRACE data can be tedious and difficult for those without strong technological backgrounds in programming or other related fields. The GRACE web app helps bridge the technical gap for decision makers by providing a user interface to visualize (in both map and time series format), not only the data collected from the GRACE mission, but the individual components of water storage as well. Using the GLDAS Land Surface model, the application allows the user to isolate and identify the changes in surface water and groundwater storage that makeup the total water storage quantities measured by the raw GRACE data. The application also includes the capability to upload a custom shapefile in order to perform a regional analysis of these changes allowing decision makers to aggregate and analyze the change in groundwater, surface water, and total water storage within their own personal regions of interest.

This data shows the location of water quality monitoring stations in Pierce County. Monitoring station collect various data that can be downloaded from Pierce County Public Works - Surface Water Management's Water Data Viewer website. The website's URL is https://waterquality.piercecountywa.org/. There an API for accessing and downloading the data. The API's URL is https://waterquality.piercecountywa.org/KiWIS/KiWIS?datasource=0&service=kisters&type=queryServices&request=getrequestinfo.Please read the metadata (https://matterhorn.piercecountywa.gov/GISmetadata/pdbswm_water_quality_monitoring_sites.html) for additional information. Any data download constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use (https://matterhorn.piercecountywa.gov/disclaimer/PierceCountyGISDataTermsofUse.pdf).

A map tool for viewing surface water quality data from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)'s Surface Water Quality Monitoring Information System. The Texas Clean Rivers Program is a partnership between the TCEQ and regional water authorities to coordinate and conduct water quality monitoring, assessment, and stakeholder participation to improve the quality of surface water within each river basin in Texas. Contact Email: crp@tceq.texas.gov

This layer is intended for use in the Wisconsin PFAS Interactive Data Viewer GIS mapping application, use for any other purpose should be done with caution to avoid misuse or misinterpretation of information contained in this layer. Please seek appropriate DNR staff support.This layer has been created specifically to display monitoring locations and results from Wisconsin DNR PFAS surface water and fish tissue samples. The results are used to help develop a baseline of PFAS contamination within the state, help to identify action areas and provide the necessary data for appropriate responses.For more information, please visit the DNR's Surface Water and Fish Tissue PFAS Sampling website.

Groundwater is the water that soaks into the ground from rain and can be stored beneath the ground. Groundwater floods occur when the water stored beneath the ground rises above the land surface.It generally requires sustained rainfall over relatively longer duration than other forms of flooding, its location is discontinuous, and they can last for weeks or months. The increased frequency of groundwater flooding in Ireland in recent decades has highlighted the need to better understand, map and monitor groundwater flood events. In this context Geological Survey Ireland initiated theGWFlood projectin 2016 in order to address the deficit of data and fit-for-purpose flood maps. With the GWFlood project now complete, our work on groundwater flooding is now advancing through the newly establishedGWClimate projectwhich is developing flood forecast tools and evaluate the potential impacts of climate change to groundwater flooding (and groundwater drought).Installation of monitoring infrastructure commenced in October 2016. Over 60 exploratory monitoring stations were installed in counties Galway, Clare, Mayo, Roscommon, Longford and Westmeath. The installation of permanent monitoring stations began in summer 2017 and was completed in mid-2019. A subset of 18 sites representative of the spectrum of groundwater flooding conditions were established as permanent telemetered stations providing real-time information on water levels. Data from the telemetry network is available to the public through our Groundwater Level Data Viewer.

The Global Groundwater Information System (GGIS) is an interactive, web-based portal to groundwater-related information and knowledge. The GGIS consists of several modules structured around various themes. Each module has its own map-based viewer with underlying database to allow storing and visualizing geospatial data in a systematic way. Data sets include global data on transboundary aquifers, global groundwater data by aquifer, and country disaggregation, global groundwater stress (based on GRACE data), global groundwater quality data. There is also specific regional/national data focusing on the following aquifers: Dinaric Karst (Balkans), Ramotswa and Stampriet aquifers (Southern Africa), Esquipulas-Ocotepeque-Citala (Central Amerca), Pretashkent Aquifer (Central Asia). It also provides access to SADC Groundwater Information Portal, and groundwater on Small Island States

Global Observatory of Lake Responses to Environmental Change (GloboLakes) was a project funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) with the following grant references: NE/J023345/2, NE/J02211X/1, NE/J023396/1, NE/J021717/1 and NE/J022810/1.

This dataset contains the GloboLakes LSWT v4.0 of daily observations of Lake Surface Water Temperature (LSWT), its uncertainty and quality levels. The LSWTs are obtained by combining the orbit data from the AVHRR (Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer) on MetOpA, AATSR (Advanced Along Track Scanning Radiometer) on Envisat and ATSR-2 (Along Track Scanning Radiometer) on ERS-2 (European Remote Sensing Satellite). The temperatures from the different instruments have been derived with the same algorithm and harmonised to insure consistency for the period 1995-2016. The GloboLakes LSWT v4.0 was produced by the University of Reading in 2018 for long term observations of surface water temperature for about 1000 lakes globally.

The dataset consist of two sets of files: 1) a single file per day on a 0.05° regular latitude- longitude grid covering the period from June 1995 to December 2016 (folder = daily), 2) a file per lake which contains the time series (daily) of the lake on a 0.05° regular grid (folder = per-lake). The list of the GloboLakes lakes is included as a CSV file and it contains name, GLWD identifier, coordinate of the lake centre and a set of coordinates that can be used to locate the lake in the daily-file dataset. The LSWTs consists of the daily observations of the temperature of the water (skin temperature). Uncertainty estimates and quality levels are provided for each value.

Surface- and ground-water quality data were collected in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint (ACF) River basin from August 1992 to September 1995 as part of the USGS National Water Quality Assessment (NAWQA) program described below. The ACF River basin drains about 19,800 square miles in western Georgia, eastern Alabama, and the Florida panhandle into the Apalachicola Bay, which discharges into the Gulf of Mexico. Data collected as part of this study focused on five major land uses: poultry production in the headwaters of the Chattahoochee River, urban and suburban areas of Metropolitan Atlanta and Columbus, silviculture in the piedmont and fall line hills, and row crop agriculture in the upper coastal plain (clastic hydrogeologic setting) and the lower coastal plain (karst hydrogeologic setting).

This description is for the surface-water sites which are grouped based on six landuse classifications: poultry, suburban, urban, silviculture, agriculture (clastic geology) and agriculure (karst geology), and by site type: main stem and tributary. The data are grouped into three catogories including water column, bed sediment and tissue, and Biological. The data are further subdivided into sets of related constituents. A complete list of constituent names and MRL's is available.

The user can view and retrieve these surface-water data sets:

Water Column: Field Measurements, Nutrients, Major Ions, Suspended Sediment, Organic Carbon, Turbidity, Pesticides .

Bed-Sediment and Tissue: Semivolitile Organic Compounds in Sediment, Organochlorine Compounds in Sediment, Major and Trace Elements in Sediment, Organochlorine Compounds in Tissue, Trace Elements in Tissue.

Biological: Algae, Fish, Invertebrates.

Physical, chemical, and biological data were collected at 132 stream sites and at 15 locations within 6 reservoirs. The monitoring network is a nested design with a core of fixed monitoring sites (integrator and indicator sites), a group of land-use comparison sites, and a group of mixed land use sites including large tributaries and main stem rivers that provide spatial distribution. Water samples were collected at frequencies varying from hourly to annually, depending on the intended purpose, and were analyzed for nutrients, carbon, pesticides, major ions, and field parameters.

These data and associated locator maps are accessible on the World Wide Web at the ACF NAWQA home page. Data are presented in manageable tables that are grouped based on land use, site type, and project component. The user can view maps and data tables on the computer screen, or downloaded data tables as tab delimited (RDB) files.

Data collected as part of the ACF River basin study are presented by project component: surface-water, ground-water, special studies, streamflow, ancillary, and quality assurance data. The water-quality data are presented by major headings, including water-column, bed-sediment and tissue, and biological. The data are further subdivided into data sets consisting of related constituents. Data tables can be viewed on the users computer screen or retrieved to a users computer as a tab delimited Relational Data Base (RDB) file. To reduce the size of the pesticide, volatile organic compound, bed sediment and tissue, and trace element tables, only those compounds found equal to, or above the minimum reporting limit (MRL) for one or more sites within a group, are shown. The remaining compounds were not detected. A complete list of constituent names and MRL's are available.

The National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is designed to describe the status and trends in the quality of the Nation's ground- and surface-water resources and to provide a sound understanding of the natural and human factors that affect the quality of these resources (Leahy and others, 1990). Because much of the public concern over water quality stems from a desire to protect both human health and aquatic life, the NAWQA Program will, in addition to measuring physical and chemical indicators of water-quality, assess the status of aquatic life through surveys of fish, invertebrates, and benthic algae, and habitat conditions (National Research Council, 1990). As an integrated assessment of water quality incorporating physical, chemical, and biological components, the NAWQA Program is ecological in approach.

Statewide AEM Surveys Project Overview

The Department of Water Resources’ (DWR’s) Statewide Airborne Electromagnetic (AEM) Surveys Project is funded through California’s Proposition 68 and the General Fund. The goal of the project is to improve the understanding of groundwater aquifer structure to support the state and local goal of sustainable groundwater management and the implementation of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA).

During an AEM survey, a helicopter tows electronic equipment that sends signals into the ground which bounce back. The data collected are used to create continuous images showing the distribution of electrical resistivity values of the subsurface materials that can be interpreted for lithologic properties. The resulting information will provide a standardized, statewide dataset that improves the understanding of large-scale aquifer structures and supports the development or refinement of hydrogeologic conceptual models and can help identify areas for recharging groundwater.

DWR collected AEM data in all of California’s high- and medium-priority groundwater basins, where data collection is feasible. Data were collected in a coarsely spaced grid, with a line spacing of approximately 2-miles by 8-miles. AEM data collection started in 2021 and was completed in 2023. Additional information about the project can be found on the Statewide AEM Survey website. See the publication below for an overview of the project and a preliminary analysis of the AEM data.

California’s Statewide Airborne Electromagnetic Surveys and Preliminary Hydrogeologic Interpretations

Survey Areas

AEM data are being collected in groups of groundwater basins, defined as a Survey Area. See Survey Area Map for groundwater subbasins within a Survey Area:

• Survey Area 1: 180/400 Foot Aquifer (partial), East Side (partial), Upper Valley, Forebay Aquifer, Paso Robles, Atascadero (limited), Adelaida (limited), Cuyama Valley.
• Survey Area 2: Scott River Valley, Shasta Valley, Butte Valley, Tulelake, Fall River Valley (limited), Big Valley (Modoc/Lassen County).
• Survey Area 3: Big Valley (Lake County), Ukiah Valley, Santa Rosa Plain, Petaluma Valley, Sonoma Valley.
• Survey Area 4: White Wolf, Kern County, Tulare Lake, Tule, Kaweah.
• Survey Area 5: Pleasant Valley, Westside, Kings, Madera, Chowchilla, Merced, Turlock, Modesto, Delta-Mendota
• Survey Area 6: Cosumnes, Tracy, Eastern San Joaquin, East Contra Costa, Solano, Livermore, South American, North American, Yolo, Sutter, South Yuba, North Yuba
• Survey Area 7: Colusa, Butte, Wyandotte Creek, Vina, Los Molinos, Corning, Red Bluff, Antelope, Bowman, Bend, Millville, South Battle Creek, Anderson, Enterprise, Eel River, Sierra Valley
• Survey Area 8: Seaside, Monterey, 180/400 (partially surveyed Summer 2021), Eastside (partially surveyed Summer 2021), Langley, Pajaro, Santa Cruz Mid-County, Santa Margarita, San Benito, and Llagas (partial).
• Survey Area 9: Basin Characterization Pilot Study 1 - Madera and Kings.
• Survey Area 10: San Antonio Creek Valley, Arroyo Grande, Santa Maria, San Luis Obispo, Los Osos Area, Warden Creek, Chorro Valley (limited), Morro Valley (limited)
• Survey Area 11: Indian Wells Valley, Rose Valley, Owens Valley, Fish Slough, Indio, Mission Creek, West Salton Sea (limited), East Salton Sea (limited), Ocotillo-Clark Valley (limited), Imperial Valley (limited),Chocolate Valley (limited), Borrego Springs, and San Jacinto

Data Reports

Data reports detail the AEM data collection, processing, inversion, interpretation, and uncertainty analyses methods and procedures. Data reports also describe additional datasets used to support the AEM surveys, including digitized lithology and geophysical logs. Multiple data reports may be provided for a single Survey Area, depending on the Survey Area coverage.

Data Availability and Types

All data collected as a part of the Statewide AEM Surveys will be made publicly available, by survey area, approximately six to twelve months after individual surveys are complete (depending on survey area size). Datasets that will be publicly available include:

AEM Datasets

• Raw AEM Data
• Processed AEM Data
• Inverted AEM Data
• Inverted AEM Data Uncertainty Analysis
• Interpreted AEM Data (for coarse fraction)
• Interpreted AEM Data Uncertainty Analysis

Supporting Datasets

• Flown Survey Lines
• Digitized Lithology and Geophysical Logs

NEW! Revisions to digitized lithology and geophysical logs

AEM Data Viewers

DWR has developed AEM Data Viewers to provides a quick and easy way to visualize the AEM electrical resistivity data and the AEM data interpretations (as texture) in a three-dimensional space. The most recent data available are shown, which my be the provisional data for some areas that are not yet finalized. The Data Viewers can be accessed by direct link, below, or from the Data Viewer Landing Page.

• AEM 3D Viewer (Beta) (computer only)

• AEM Profile Viewer

• SGMA Data Viewer (Basin Characterization tab)

AEM Depth Slice and Shallow Subsurface Average Maps

As a part of DWR’s upcoming Basin Characterization Program, DWR will be publishing a series of maps and tools to support advanced data analyses. The first of these maps have now been published and provide analyses of the Statewide AEM Survey data to support the identification of potential recharge areas. The maps are located on the SGMA Data Viewer (under the Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model tab) and show the AEM electrical resistivity and AEM-derived texture data as the following:

• Shallow Subsurface Average: Maps showing the average electrical resistivity and AEM-derived texture in the shallow subsurface (the top approximately 50 feet below ground surface). These maps support identification of potential recharge areas, where the top 50 feet is dominated by high resistivity or coarse-grained materials.

• Depth Slices: Depth slice automations showing changes in electrical resistivity and AEM-derived texture with depth. These maps aid in delineating the geometry of large-scale features (for example, incised valley fills).

Shapefiles for the formatted AEM electrical resistivity data and AEM derived texture data as depth slices and the shallow subsurface average can be downloaded here:

• Electrical Resistivity Depth Slices and Shallow Subsurface Average Maps

• Texture Interpretation (Coarse Fraction) Depth Slices and Shallow Subsurface Average Maps

Technical Memos

Technical memos are developed by DWR's consultant team (Ramboll Consulting) to describe research related to AEM survey planning or data collection. Research described in the technical memos may also be formally published in a journal publication.

• AEM Test Flights to Evaluate the Bias Signal Caused by Vineyard Trellises Containing Metal

• SkyTEM Instrument Comparison for Airborne EM

2018-2020 AEM Pilot Studies

Three AEM pilot studies were conducted in California from 2018-2020 to support the development of the Statewide AEM Survey Project. The AEM Pilot Studies were conducted in the Sacramento Valley in Colusa and Butte county groundwater basins, the Salinas Valley in Paso Robles groundwater basin, and in the Indian Wells Valley groundwater basin.

Provisional Statement

Data Reports and datasets labeled as provisional may be incomplete and are subject to revision until they have been thoroughly reviewed and received final approval. Provisional data and reports may be inaccurate and subsequent review may result in revisions to the data and reports. Data users are cautioned to consider carefully the provisional nature of the information before using it for decisions that concern personal or public safety or the conduct of business that involves substantial monetary or operational consequences.

Los Angeles Public Works has developed a groundwater well web viewer to provide the public with current and historical groundwater depth information throughout Los Angeles County.Purpose:To provide active wells information to the public.Supplemental Information:1. The State of California Department of Water Resources (DWR) developed the California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring (CASGEM) Program to make groundwater monitoring information available to the public through collaboration between local monitoring parties and DWR to collect groundwater elevation information statewide. The data have been compiled in the CASGEM Online System and made available to the public via the Internet with a GIS map interface. As a result, all interested parties can use the data to evaluate and monitor groundwater conditions in California.The CASGEM Online System will allow you to:• View lists of local agencies, counties and associations who have volunteered to serve as CASGEM Monitoring Entities providing groundwater data statewide• View CASGEM Monitoring Plans and Groundwater Management Plans (via hyperlink)• Search and view groundwater elevation data in tabular format• View hydrographs that show groundwater elevations for wells• Search and view groundwater monitoring well information• View mapped locations of CASGEM wells, monitoring area boundaries, and other geographic information• Measure distances between wells and size of monitoring areas and basins• Download well information, groundwater data, hydrographs and maps• Download summary reports on wells, groundwater elevations, Monitoring Entities and basin information.2. The State of California Department of Conservation developed the Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources Well Finder, which is a web viewer that allows the public to access information on oil, gas, and geothermal wells throughout the State.

DWR has a long history of studying and characterizing California’s groundwater aquifers as a part of California’s Groundwater (Bulletin 118). California's Groundwater Basin Characterization Program provides the latest data and information about California’s groundwater basins to help local communities better understand their aquifer systems and support local and statewide groundwater management.

Under the Basin Characterization Program, new and existing data (AEM, lithology logs, geophysical logs, etc.) are integrated to create continuous maps and three-dimensional models. To support this effort, new data analysis tools have been developed to create texture models, hydrostratigraphic models, and aquifer flow parameters. Data collection efforts have been expanded to include advanced geologic, hydrogeologic, and geophysical data collection and data digitization and quality control efforts will continue. To continue to support data access and data equity, the Basin Characterization Program has developed new online, GIS-based, visualization tools to serve as a central hub for accessing and exploring groundwater related data in California.

Additional information can be found on the Basin Characterization Program webpage.

DWR's Evaluation of Groundwater Resources

Maps and Models

DWR is undertaking local, regional, and statewide investigations to evaluate California's groundwater resources and develop state-stewarded maps and models. New and existing data have been combined and integrated using the analysis tools described below to develop maps and models that describe grain size, the hydrostratigraphic properties, and hydrogeologic conceptual properties of California’s aquifers. These maps and models help groundwater managers understand how groundwater is stored and moves within the aquifer. The models will be state-stewarded, meaning that they will be regularly updated, as new data becomes available, to ensure that up-to-date information is used for groundwater management activities. The first iterations of the following maps and models will be published as they are developed:

• Texture Models
• Hydrostratigraphic Models
• Aquifer Recharge Potential Maps
• Extent of Important Aquifer Units
• Depth to Basement
• Depth to Freshwater

Click on the link below for each local, regional, or statewide investigation to find the following datasets.

Local Investigations

• Madera & North Kings: AEM data collection, lithology log digitization, texture model development, aquifer recharge potential mapping analysis.
• Pajaro: AEM and tTEM data collection
• Western San Joaquin Valley: AEM data collection, lithology and geophysical log data digitization, texture model development.
• Prospect Island: AEM data collection, FloaTEM data collection test.

Regional Investigations

• Sacramento Valley: AEM data collection, texture model development, aquifer recharge potential mapping analysis.
• Four County Area of San Joaquin Valley (Madera, Fresno, Kings, and Tulare counties) : AEM data collection, texture model development, hydrogeologic conceptual model development, clay delineation, subsidence potential and mitigation, and aquifer recharge potential mapping analysis.
• San Joaquin Valley

Statewide Investigations

• Statewide AEM Surveys: AEM data collection, geophysical and lithology log data digitization.

Data Collection & Compilation

As a part of the Basin Characterization Program, advanced geologic, hydrogeologic, and geophysical data will be collected to improve our understanding of groundwater basins. Data collected under Basin Characterization are collected at a local, regional, or statewide scale depending on the scope of the study. Advanced data collection methods include:

• Airborne electromagnetics (AEM)
• All-terrain vehicle towed electromagnetics (tTEM)
• Watercraft towed electromagnetics (FloaTEM)
• Geophysical borehole logging

Digitized Existing Lithology and Geophysical Logs

Lithology and geophysical logging data have been digitized to support the Statewide AEM Survey Project and will continue to be digitized to support Basin Characterization efforts. All digitized lithology logs with Well Completion Report IDs will be imported back into the OSWCR database. Digitized lithology and geophysical logging can be found under the following resource:

• Digitized Lithology and Geophysical Logs.

Analysis Tools and Process Documents

To develop the state-stewarded maps and models outlined above, new tools and process documents have been created to integrate and analyze a wide range of data, including geologic, geophysical, and hydrogeologic information. By combining and assessing various datasets, these tools help create a more complete picture of California's groundwater basins. All tools, along with guidance documents, are made publicly available for local groundwater managers to use to support development of maps and models at a local scale. All tools and guidance will be updated as revisions to tools and process documents are made.

Data Analysis Tools

• Data2Texture: Data2Texture is an advanced spatial data interpolation tool for estimating the distribution of sediment textures from airborne electromagnetic data and lithology logs to create a 3D texture model

• Data2HSM - Smart Interpretation: Data2HSM via Smart Interpretation (SI) is a semi-automatic Python tool for delineating continuous hydrogeologic surfaces from airborne electromagnetic data products.

• Data2HSM - Gaussian Mixture Model: The Data2HSM via Gaussian Mixture Model tool ingests the AEM data and groups the data into a user-specified number of clusters that are interpreted as stratigraphic units in the hydrostratigraphic model (HSM)

• Data2HSM - Geological Pseudolabel Deep Neural Network: The GeoPDNN (Geological Pseudolabel Deep Neural Network) is a semi-supervised machine learning tool that integrates lithologic well logs and AEM data into plausible stratigraphic surfaces.

• Texture2Par V2: Texture2Par V2 is a groundwater model pre-processor and parameterization utility developed to work with the IWFM and MODFLOW families of hydrologic simulation code.

Process Documents

• Aquifer Recharge Potential Mapping: The Aquifer Recharge Potential (ARP) Mapping Process Document provides a framework for identifying locations that have relatively higher potential for managed aquifer recharge.

Data Visualization

Data access equity is a priority for the Basin Characterization Program. To ensure data access equity, the Basin Characterization Program has developed applications and tools to allow data to be visualized without needing access to expensive data visualization software. This list below provides links and descriptions for the Basin Characterization's suite of data viewers.

SGMA Data Viewer: Basin Characterization tab: Provides maps, depth slices, and profiles of Basin Characterization maps, models, and datasets, including the following:

• Aquifer Recharge Potential Maps
• Subsurface Texture Model Depth Slices
• Statewide AEM Survey Texture Depth Slices
• Lithology Log Location Maps
• Geophysical Logs Location Maps
• Statewide AEM Survey Profile Images

3D AEM Data Viewer: Displays the Statewide AEM Survey electrical resistivity and coarse fraction data,

Sampling points in the surface water system (river or water body) carried out by persons of public status with a view to supplying drinking water to human communities (Articles L131-2 and L131-2-1 of the Public Health Code, Article L215-13 of the Environmental Code). Such levies shall be the subject of a declaration of public utility. For the purposes of public dissemination, the positioning of the collection points is located at the centroid of the municipality concerned.

A well is a hole dug into the ground usually for the purpose of taking water from the ground but also for monitoring groundwater. Most private wells are used for home and farm water supplies are in rural areas. Springs occur where groundwater comes out at the surface. A borehole is a hole drilled into the ground to gain access to groundwater. The hole is usually deep, narrow and round. This map shows the location of the dug wells, springs and boreholes in Ireland. Data was collected by GSI drilling or submitted to the GSI from Local Authorities and other state bodies, Private Well Grants, Drillers, Consultants, Group Water Schemes and Academia. The location accuracy is visually portrayed on the GSI webmapping viewer by the size of the circle displaying the record. It is NOT a comprehensive database and many wells and springs are not included in this database. You should not rely only on this database, and should undertake your own site study for wells in the area of interest if needed. This map is to the scale 1:100,000. This means it should be viewed at that scale. When printed at that scale 1cm on the map relates to a distance of 1km. It is a vector dataset. Vector data portray the world using points, lines, and polygons (areas). The data is shown as polygons. Each polygon holds information on the location of the borehole (X and Y coordinates), Well ID (well identifier), hole details, location details, yield, abstraction ,drilling details. .hidden { display: none }

This app on the hydrology website allows views and downloads of groundwater data (daily water levels) from the SCDNR Hydrology Section's Groundwater Monitoring Network. A hydrograph can be viewed for each well. The period of record can be customized, and data can be download in CSV format.Data are updated approximately monthly.

This map viewer and associated information on this website is being made available by Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts (TAGD) as a public service. The information provided has been self-reported by Groundwater Conservation Districts (GCDs) to TAGD. TAGD requests updated information from GCDs at regular intervals, with the current data collected in 2020. Contact Email: adam@texasgroundwater.org

The WellNet database contains information related to sites for surface water measurements. These data are used by NDWR to assess the condition of the groundwater and surface water systems over time and are available to the public on NDWR’s website. Surface water measurement sites are chosen based on availability of dedicated measurement equipment, permit terms, and where additional flow information is required. This dataset is updated every day from a non-spatial SQL Server database using lat/long coordinates to display location. The feature class participates in a relationship class with a surface water measure table joined using the sitename field. This dataset contains both active and inactive sites. Measurement data is provided by reporting agencies and by regular site visits from NDWR staff. For website access, please see the Stream/Spring site at http://water.nv.gov/SpringAndStreamFlow.aspx.

Statistical analyses and maps representing mean, high, and low water-level conditions in the surface water and groundwater of Miami-Dade County were made by the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources, to help inform decisions necessary for urban planning and development. Sixteen maps were created that show contours of (1) the mean of daily water levels at each site during October and May for the 2000-2009 water years; (2) the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the daily water levels at each site during October and May and for all months during 2000-2009; and (3) the differences between mean October and May water levels, as well as the differences in the percentiles of water levels for all months, between 1990-1999 and 2000-2009. The 80th, 90th, and 96th percentiles of the annual maximums of daily groundwater levels during 1974-2009 (a 35-year period) were computed to provide an indication of unusually high groundwater-level conditions. These maps and statistics provide a generalized understanding of the variations of water levels in the aquifer, rather than a survey of concurrent water levels. Water-level measurements from 473 sites in Miami-Dade County and surrounding counties were analyzed to generate statistical analyses. The monitored water levels included surface-water levels in canals and wetland areas and groundwater levels in the Biscayne aquifer. Maps were created by importing site coordinates, summary water-level statistics, and completeness of record statistics into a geographic information system, and by interpolating between water levels at monitoring sites in the canals and water levels along the coastline. Raster surfaces were created from these data by using the triangular irregular network interpolation method. The raster surfaces were contoured by using geographic information system software. These contours were imprecise in some areas because the software could not fully evaluate the hydrology given available information; therefore, contours were manually modified where necessary. The ability to evaluate differences in water levels between 1990-1999 and 2000-2009 is limited in some areas because most of the monitoring sites did not have 80 percent complete records for one or both of these periods. The quality of the analyses was limited by (1) deficiencies in spatial coverage; (2) the combination of pre- and post-construction water levels in areas where canals, levees, retention basins, detention basins, or water-control structures were installed or removed; (3) an inability to address the potential effects of the vertical hydraulic head gradient on water levels in wells of different depths; and (4) an inability to correct for the differences between daily water-level statistics. Contours are dashed in areas where the locations of contours have been approximated because of the uncertainty caused by these limitations. Although the ability of the maps to depict differences in water levels between 1990-1999 and 2000-2009 was limited by missing data, results indicate that near the coast water levels were generally higher in May during 2000-2009 than during 1990-1999; and that inland water levels were generally lower during 2000-2009 than during 1990-1999. Generally, the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of water levels from all months were also higher near the coast and lower inland during 2000–2009 than during 1990-1999. Mean October water levels during 2000-2009 were generally higher than during 1990-1999 in much of western Miami-Dade County, but were lower in a large part of eastern Miami-Dade County.