The table Firm survey wave 1 and 2 (GIS) is part of the dataset SEDRI Ethiopia firm survey (GIS), available at https://stanford.redivis.com/datasets/rxq3-9x047we25. It contains 1585 rows across 3377 variables.
The United States Public Land Survey (PLS) divided land into one square
mile units, termed sections. Surveyors used trees to locate section corners
and other locations of interest (witness trees). As a result, a systematic
ecological dataset was produced with regular sampling over a large region
of the United States, beginning in Ohio in 1786 and continuing westward.
We digitized and georeferenced archival hand drawn maps of these witness
trees for 27 counties in Ohio. This dataset consists of a GIS point
shapefile with 11,925 points located at section corners, recording 26,028
trees (up to four trees could be recorded at each corner). We retain species
names given on each archival map key, resulting in 70 unique species common
names. PLS records were obtained from hand-drawn archival maps of original
witness trees produced by researchers at The Ohio State University in the
1960’s. Scans of these maps are archived as “The Edgar Nelson Transeau Ohio
Vegetation Survey” at The Ohio State University: http://hdl.handle.net/1811/64106.
The 27 counties are: Adams, Allen, Auglaize, Belmont, Brown, Darke,
Defiance, Gallia, Guernsey, Hancock, Lawrence, Lucas, Mercer, Miami,
Monroe, Montgomery, Morgan, Noble, Ottawa, Paulding, Pike, Putnam, Scioto,
Seneca, Shelby, Williams, Wyandot. Coordinate Reference System:
North American Datum 1983 (NAD83). This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grants #DEB-1241874, 1241868, 1241870, 1241851, 1241891, 1241846, 1241856, 1241930.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Public Land Survey SystemThis feature layer, utilizing National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDA) data from the Bureau of Land Management data, displays the Public Land Survey System (PLSS) in the United States. Per BLM, "The BLM is required to perform cadastral surveys on all federal interest and Indian lands. As part of survey work, the BLM maintains an essential land grid, known as the rectangular survey system or Public Land Survey System (PLSS), which is the basis for identifying legal descriptions of land parcels."PLSS Township 7N 22EData downloaded: October 17, 2023Data source: BLM National Public Land Survey System PolygonsNGDAID: 10 (BLM National PLSS Public Land Survey System Polygons)OGC API Features Link: (Public_Land_Survey_System - OGC Features) copy this link to embed it in OGC Compliant viewersFor more information: About the Public Land Survey SystemSupport documentation: BLM National PLSS Public Land Survey System PolygonsFor feedback please contact: ArcGIScomNationalMaps@esri.comNGDA Data SetThis data set is part of the NGDA Cadastre Theme Community. Per the Federal Geospatial Data Committee (FGDC), Cadastre is defined as the "past, current, and future rights and interests in real property including the spatial information necessary to describe geographic extents. Rights and interests are benefits or enjoyment in real property that can be conveyed, transferred, or otherwise allocated to another for economic remuneration. Rights and interests are recorded in land record documents. The spatial information necessary to describe geographic extents includes surveys and legal description frameworks such as the Public Land Survey System, as well as parcel-by-parcel surveys and descriptions. Does not include federal government or military facilities."For other NGDA Content: Esri Federal Datasets
The prefixes f1_ and f2_ indicate that variables correspond to either wave 1 or wave 2, respectively.
DOUGLAS COUNTY SURVEY/GISGIS PARCEL MAPPING GUIDELINES FOR PARCEL DISCREPANCIESIt is the intent of the Douglas County GIS Parcel Mapping to accurately identify the areas of land parcels to be valued and taxed 1. Discrepancies in areas• The Auditor/Assessor (tax) acreage areas started with the original US General Land Office (GLO) township plat maps created from the Public Land Survey (PLS) that was done between 1858 and 1871. The recovery of the PLS corners and the accurate location of these corners with GPS obtained coordinates has allowed for accurate section subdivisions, which results in accurate areas for parcels based on legal descriptions, which may be significantly different than the original areas. (See Example 2)• Any parcel bordering a meandered lake and/or a water boundary will likely have a disparity of area between the Auditor/Assessor acreages and the GIS acreages because of the inaccuracy of the original GLO meander lines from which the original areas were determined. Water lines are not able to be drafted to the same accuracy as the normal parcel lines. The water lines are usually just sketched on a survey and their dimensions are not generally given on a land record. The water boundaries of our GIS parcels are located from aerial photography. This is a subjective determination based on the interpretation by the Survey/GIS technician of what is water. Some lakes fluctuate significantly and the areas of all parcels bordering water are subject to constant change. In these cases the ordinary high water line (OHW) is attempted to be identified. Use of 2-foot contours will be made, if available. (See Example 1)• Some land records do not accurately report the area described in the land description and the description area is ignored. (See Example 3)• The parcel mapping has made every attempt to map the parcels based on available survey information as surveyed and located on the ground. This may conflict with some record legal descriptions.Solutions• If an actual survey by a licensed Land Surveyor is available, it will be utilized for the tax acreage.• If the Auditor/Assessor finds a discrepancy between the tax and GIS areas, they will request a review by the County Survey/GIS department.• As a starting guideline, the County Survey/GIS department will identify all parcels that differ in tax area versus GIS parcel area of 10 % or more and a difference of at least 5 acres. (This could be expanded later after the initial review.)• Each of these identified parcels will be reviewed individually by the County Survey/GIS department to determine the reason for the discrepancy and a recommendation will be made by the County Survey/GIS department to the Auditor/Assessor if the change should be made or not.• If a change is to be made to the tax area, a letter will be sent to the taxpayer informing them that their area will be changed during the next tax cycle, which could affect their property valuation. This letter will originate from the Auditor/Assessor with explanation from the County Survey/GIS department. 2. Gaps and Overlaps• Land descriptions for adjoining parcels sometimes overlap or leave a gap between them.o In these instances the Survey/GIS technician has to make a decision where to place this boundary. A number of circumstances are reviewed to facilitate this decision as these dilemmas are usually decided on a case by case basis. All effort will be made to not leave a gap, but sometimes this is not possible and the gap will be shown with “unknown” ownership. (Note: The County does not have the authority to change boundaries!)o Some of the circumstances reviewed are: Which parcel had the initial legal description? Does the physical occupation of the parcel line as shown on the air photo more closely fit one of the described parcels? Interpretation of the intent of the legal description. Is the legal description surveyable?Note: These overlaps will be shown on the GIS map with a dashed “survey line” and accompanying text for the line not used for the parcel boundary. 3. Parcel lines that do not match location of buildings Structures on parcels do not always lie within the boundaries of the parcel. This may be a circumstance of building without the benefit of a survey or of misinterpreting these boundaries. The parcel lines should be shown accurately as surveyed and/or described regardless of the location of structures on the ground. NOTE: The GIS mapping is not a survey, but is an interpretation of parcel boundaries predicated upon resources available to the County Survey/GIS department.Gary Stevenson Page 1 7/21/2017Example 1Example 2A Example 2B Example 3
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The 3D Land Surveying System market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach a market size of $1752.7 million in 2025. While the provided CAGR is missing, considering the technological advancements driving automation in surveying and the increasing demand for precise data in infrastructure development and construction, a conservative estimate of a 7% CAGR from 2025 to 2033 is reasonable. This would indicate a significant expansion of the market, driven by factors such as the increasing adoption of advanced technologies like LiDAR and photogrammetry, rising infrastructure investments globally, and the need for efficient and accurate land data for urban planning and environmental monitoring. The market segmentation, encompassing fixed and mobile surveying systems and applications across surveying & mapping, construction, and other sectors, reveals diverse growth opportunities. The preference for mobile systems is likely to increase due to their portability and ease of use, while the construction sector is expected to be a major driver of market growth due to the rising number of construction projects globally. The regional distribution shows substantial potential across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, reflecting the concentration of developed economies and significant infrastructure investments. However, developing regions in the Middle East & Africa and South America are also showing promising growth potential as infrastructure development and urbanization accelerate. Competitive dynamics involve a mix of established surveying firms and emerging technology providers, emphasizing both service-based and technology-driven solutions. The continued integration of AI and machine learning into surveying systems is likely to further enhance the efficiency and accuracy of land surveying, fueling market expansion in the coming years. This combination of technological innovation and growing infrastructural needs ensures a sustained upward trajectory for the 3D Land Surveying System market.
In support of new permitting workflows associated with anticipated WellSTAR needs, the CalGEM GIS unit extended the existing BLM PLSS Township & Range grid to cover offshore areas with the 3-mile limit of California jurisdiction. The PLSS grid as currently used by CalGEM is a composite of a BLM download (the majority of the data), additions by the DPR, and polygons created by CalGEM to fill in missing areas (the Ranchos, and Offshore areas within the 3-mile limit of California jurisdiction).CalGEM is the Geologic Energy Management Division of the California Department of Conservation, formerly the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (as of January 1, 2020).Update Frequency: As Needed
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
Download .zipThis data set represents the GIS Version of the Public Land Survey System including both rectangular and non-rectangular surveys. The metadata describes the lineage, sources and production methods for the data content. The definitions and structure of this data is compliant with FGDC Cadastral Data Content Standards and Guidelines for publication. This coverage was originally created for the accurate location of the oil and gas wells in the state of Ohio. The original data set was developed as an ArcInfo coverage containing the original land subdivision boundaries for Ohio. Ohio has had a long and varied history of its land subdivisions that has led to the use of several subdivision strategies being applied. In general, these different schemes are composed of the Public Land Surveying System (PLSS) subdivisions and the irregular land subdivisions. The PLSS subdivisions contain townships, ranges, and sections. They are found in the following major land subdivisions: Old Seven Ranges, Between the Miamis (parts of which are known as the Symmes Purchase), Congress Lands East of Scioto River, Congress Lands North of Old Seven Ranges, Congress Lands West of Miami River, North and East of the First Principal Meridian, South and East of the First Principal Meridian, and the Michigan Meridian Survey. The irregular subdivisions include the Virginia Military District, the Ohio Company Purchase, the U.S. Military District, the Connecticut Western Reserve, the Twelve-Mile Square Reservation, the Two-Mile Square Reservation, the Refugee Lands, the French Grants, and the Donation Tract. This data set represents the GIS Version of the Public Land Survey System including both rectangular and non-rectangular surveys. The primary source for the data is local records and geographic control coordinates from states, counties as well as federal agencies such as the BLM, USGS and USFS. The data has been converted from source documents to digital form and transferred into a GIS format that is compliant with FGDC Cadastral Data Content Standards and Guidelines for publication. This data is optimized for data publication and sharing rather than for specific "production" or operation and maintenance. This data set includes the following: PLSS Fully Intersected (all of the PLSS feature at the atomic or smallest polygon level), PLSS Townships, First Divisions and Second Divisions (the hierarchical break down of the PLSS Rectangular surveys) PLSS Special surveys (non rectangular components of the PLSS) Meandered Water, Corners and Conflicted Areas (known areas of gaps or overlaps between Townships or state boundaries). The Entity-Attribute section of this metadata describes these components in greater detail.This data set is optimized for data publication and sharing rather than for specific "production" or operation and maintenance. This data set includes the following: PLSS Fully Intersected (all of the PLSS feature at the atomic or smallest polygon level), PLSS Townships, First Divisions and Second Divisions (the hierarchical break down of the PLSS Rectangular surveys) PLSS Special surveys (non rectangular components of the PLSS) Meandered Water, Corners and Conflicted Areas (known areas of gaps or overlaps between Townships or state boundaries). The Entity-Attribute section of this metadata describes these components in greater detail.Contact Information:GIS Support, ODNR GIS ServicesOhio Department of Natural ResourcesOffice of Information TechnologyGIS Records2045 Morse Rd, Bldg I-2Columbus, OH, 43229Telephone: 614-265-6462Email: gis.support@dnr.ohio.gov
https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy
The global GIS data collector market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing adoption of precision agriculture, expanding infrastructure development projects, and the rising demand for accurate geospatial data across various industries. The market, estimated at $2.5 billion in 2025, is projected to witness a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $4.2 billion by 2033. Key drivers include the increasing availability of affordable and high-precision GPS technology, coupled with advancements in data processing and cloud-based solutions. The integration of GIS data collectors with other technologies, such as drones and IoT sensors, is further fueling market expansion. The demand for high-precision GIS data collectors is particularly strong in sectors like surveying, mapping, and construction, where accuracy is paramount. While the market faces challenges such as high initial investment costs and the need for specialized expertise, the overall growth trajectory remains positive. The market is segmented by application (agriculture, industrial, forestry, and others) and by type (general precision and high precision). North America and Europe currently hold significant market shares, but the Asia-Pacific region is anticipated to experience rapid growth in the coming years due to substantial infrastructure development and increasing government investments in geospatial technologies. The competitive landscape is characterized by both established players like Trimble, Garmin, and Hexagon (Leica Geosystems) and emerging companies offering innovative solutions. These companies are constantly innovating, integrating advanced technologies like AI and machine learning to enhance data collection and analysis capabilities. This competition is driving down prices and improving product quality, benefiting end-users. The increasing use of mobile GIS and cloud-based data management solutions is also transforming the industry, making data collection and analysis more accessible and efficient. Future growth will be largely influenced by the advancement of 5G networks, enabling faster data transmission and real-time applications, and the increasing adoption of automation and AI in data processing workflows. Furthermore, government regulations promoting the use of accurate geospatial data for sustainable development and environmental monitoring are creating new opportunities for the market’s expansion.
https://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policy
The global construction mapping services market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing adoption of advanced technologies like drones, LiDAR, and GIS in the construction industry. The market's expansion is fueled by the need for precise and efficient site surveying, improved project planning and management, enhanced safety protocols, and reduced project costs and delays. Several key trends are shaping the market: the rising preference for 3D modeling and digital twins for better visualization and coordination, the integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) with mapping data for seamless workflows, and the increasing demand for real-time data acquisition and analysis for informed decision-making. The market is segmented by surveying type (aerial and terrestrial) and application (before, during, and after construction). Aerial surveying, particularly using drones, is gaining significant traction due to its cost-effectiveness, speed, and ability to capture detailed data from challenging terrains. The "during construction" application segment is witnessing strong growth as contractors leverage mapping data to monitor progress, identify potential issues, and ensure compliance with project specifications. While the market exhibits substantial growth potential, certain restraints exist. High initial investment costs associated with acquiring and maintaining sophisticated equipment can be a barrier to entry for smaller firms. Data security and privacy concerns related to handling sensitive project information also pose challenges. Furthermore, regulatory hurdles and the need for skilled professionals proficient in data processing and interpretation can impact market growth in some regions. However, ongoing technological advancements and increasing government investments in infrastructure projects are expected to mitigate these restraints. The competition is intense, with both large multinational corporations and specialized surveying firms vying for market share. The market is geographically diverse, with North America and Europe currently holding significant shares but the Asia-Pacific region showing the strongest growth potential due to rapid urbanization and infrastructure development. By 2033, the market is projected to achieve substantial expansion, driven by continuous advancements in technology and the increasing reliance on data-driven decision-making within the construction sector. We estimate the market to reach a value of approximately $15 billion by 2033 assuming a conservative CAGR of 8%, considering the growth factors and restraints.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset represents the GIS Version of the Public Land Survey System including both rectangular and non-rectangular surveys. The primary source for the data is cadastral survey records housed by the BLM supplemented with local records and geographic control coordinates from states, counties as well as other federal agencies such as the USGS and USFS. The data has been converted from source documents to digital form and transferred into a GIS format that is compliant with FGDC Cadastral Data Content Standards and Guidelines for publication. This data is optimized for data publication and sharing rather than for specific 'production' or operation and maintenance. This data set includes the following: PLSS Fully Intersected (all of the PLSS feature at the atomic or smallest polygon level), PLSS Townships, First Divisions and Second Divisions (the hierarchical break down of the PLSS Rectangular surveys), and the Bureau of Census 2015 Cartographic State Boundaries. The Entity-Attribute section of this metadata describes these components in greater detail. Please note that the data on this site, although published at regular intervals, may not be the most current PLSS data that is available from the BLM. Updates to the PLSS data at the BLM State Offices may have occurred since this data was published. To ensure users have the most current data, please contact the BLM PLSS Data Set Manager.
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The global land and sea surveying and mapping market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing infrastructure development, rising urbanization, and the growing need for precise geospatial data across various sectors. While the exact market size for 2025 is not provided, considering the presence of numerous established players like KSN, Partner Engineering and Science, and Tetra Tech, and a reasonably high number of regional players, a conservative estimate places the 2025 market size at approximately $15 billion. Assuming a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7% (a figure reflective of the growth in related geospatial technology markets), the market is projected to reach approximately $23 billion by 2033. This growth trajectory is fueled by technological advancements such as the integration of drones, LiDAR, and GPS, improving data acquisition speed and accuracy. Furthermore, the increasing adoption of BIM (Building Information Modeling) and GIS (Geographic Information Systems) technologies are significantly boosting demand for high-quality surveying and mapping services. However, market growth faces some restraints. High initial investment costs associated with sophisticated equipment and specialized software can limit entry for smaller firms. Additionally, the need for highly skilled professionals and stringent regulatory compliance can pose challenges. The market is segmented by service type (topographic, hydrographic, cadastral, etc.), technology used (GPS, LiDAR, photogrammetry), and end-user industry (construction, energy, environmental management). The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of large multinational corporations and smaller, specialized firms, leading to a dynamic market with ongoing innovation and consolidation. Regional variations in market growth will be influenced by factors such as infrastructure spending, government regulations, and economic conditions in specific regions.
https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The global market for Surveying and Mapping RTK (Real-Time Kinematic) products is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach $783 million in 2025 and maintain a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 5.9% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is driven by increasing infrastructure development globally, particularly in rapidly urbanizing regions and developing nations. The rising adoption of precision agriculture, coupled with the growing demand for accurate land and resource management, significantly contributes to market growth. Furthermore, advancements in RTK technology, leading to improved accuracy, reliability, and efficiency, are fueling wider adoption across various sectors. The integration of RTK systems with other technologies like GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and drones further enhances their utility and contributes to the overall market expansion. Specific application areas, like urban planning and construction, roads and bridges, and mineral resource exploration, are key contributors to market demand, while segments such as dual-frequency RTK systems are witnessing faster adoption due to their superior performance capabilities. Major players like Leica (Hexagon), Trimble, and FARO are driving innovation and market competition, while several regional players are catering to specific geographic needs. The market segmentation by application (Land and Resources Management, Urban Planning and Construction, Roads and Bridges, Mineral Resources, Others) and type (Single-Frequency RTK, Dual-Frequency RTK) provides crucial insights into market dynamics. While land and resource management currently holds a significant share, the urban planning and construction sector is projected to experience the fastest growth due to increasing urbanization and infrastructure projects. Similarly, dual-frequency RTK systems are gaining traction due to their higher accuracy, enabling more sophisticated applications. Regional variations in market growth are expected, with North America and Asia-Pacific likely to dominate due to robust infrastructure investments and technological advancements in these regions. However, emerging economies in regions like South America and Africa present significant untapped potential for future growth, driven by increasing government investments in infrastructure and surveying projects. The overall market outlook for Surveying and Mapping RTK products remains positive, propelled by technological advancements, rising demand across multiple sectors, and expanding applications globally.
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The global surveying and mapping services market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing infrastructure development, urbanization, and the rising adoption of advanced technologies like GIS, LiDAR, and drones. This market is projected to reach a substantial size, with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) indicating a significant expansion throughout the forecast period (2025-2033). While precise figures for market size and CAGR are not provided, based on industry analysis of similar sectors exhibiting comparable growth trajectories, a reasonable estimation suggests a market size exceeding $100 billion by 2033, with a CAGR of around 7-8%. This growth is fueled by several key drivers, including the burgeoning need for precise geospatial data in various sectors like construction, agriculture, mining, and environmental management. Government initiatives promoting infrastructure development and smart city projects further contribute to this market expansion. The market is segmented by service type (e.g., land surveying, hydrographic surveying, aerial mapping), technology used, and end-user industries. Leading players like PASCO Corporation, Fugro, AECOM, and Stantec are leveraging technological advancements and strategic partnerships to maintain their market share and expand their service offerings. However, challenges such as fluctuating raw material prices, stringent regulatory frameworks, and skilled labor shortages could potentially restrain market growth in certain regions. The increasing availability of low-cost satellite imagery and the emergence of innovative mapping solutions present both opportunities and competitive pressures within the industry. The adoption of cloud-based solutions for data storage and processing is expected to gain significant traction, further shaping the market landscape in the years to come. Regional variations in market growth are anticipated, with developed economies experiencing more moderate growth compared to developing nations with rapid infrastructure development.
Survey sections and private claims for Michigan's Upper and Lower PeninsulasMore Metadata
https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The RTK (Real-Time Kinematic) Survey Systems market, valued at $783 million in 2025, is poised for robust growth, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 5.9% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is driven by several key factors. Firstly, the increasing adoption of precise positioning technologies across various sectors, including land and resources management, urban planning and construction, and mineral resource exploration, fuels demand. The rising complexity of infrastructure projects and the need for accurate data for efficient planning and execution further contribute to market growth. Technological advancements, such as the development of more accurate and reliable dual-frequency RTK systems, are also significantly impacting the market. Furthermore, the increasing integration of RTK systems with other technologies like GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and drones enhances their functionality and appeal across various applications. Governments' increasing focus on infrastructure development and smart city initiatives in developing economies like those in Asia-Pacific creates significant growth opportunities. However, market growth may be somewhat tempered by certain restraining factors. The high initial investment cost associated with RTK equipment and the requirement for skilled personnel to operate the systems could limit wider adoption, especially among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Furthermore, the potential impact of economic downturns on infrastructure spending could also temporarily slow market growth. Nonetheless, the long-term outlook for the RTK Survey Systems market remains positive, driven by continuous technological advancements and expanding applications across various industries. The market segmentation by application (Land and Resources Management, Urban Planning and Construction, Roads and Bridges, Mineral Resources, Others) and type (Single-Frequency RTK, Dual-Frequency RTK) provides further insights into market dynamics and allows for tailored strategies to penetrate specific niche markets. Competition amongst established players like Leica (Hexagon), Trimble, and FARO, as well as emerging companies from China, is expected to remain intense, driving innovation and pricing pressures. This in-depth report provides a comprehensive analysis of the global RTK Survey Systems market, projecting a multi-million-unit market by 2033. We delve into market dynamics, competitive landscapes, and future growth trajectories, offering invaluable insights for stakeholders across the industry. The study covers the historical period (2019-2024), base year (2025), and forecast period (2025-2033), leveraging extensive data analysis to deliver actionable intelligence. Keywords: RTK GPS, Real-Time Kinematic, GNSS Surveying, Surveying Equipment, Land Surveying, GIS, Mapping, Positioning Systems, Precision Agriculture.
BLM NV PLSSSpecialSurvey: This dataset represents the GIS Version of the Public Land Survey System including both rectangular and non-rectangular surveys. The primary source for the data is cadastral survey records housed by the BLM supplemented with local records and geographic control coordinates from states, counties as well as other federal agencies such as the USGS and USFS. The data has been converted from source documents to digital form and transferred into a GIS format that is compliant with FGDC Cadastral Data Content Standards and Guidelines for publication. This data is optimized for data publication and sharing rather than for specific "production" or operation and maintenance. This data set includes the following: PLSS Fully Intersected (all of the PLSS feature at the atomic or smallest polygon level), PLSS Townships, First Divisions and Second Divisions (the hierarchical break down of the PLSS Rectangular surveys) PLSS Special surveys (non rectangular components of the PLSS) Meandered Water, Corners and Conflicted Areas (known areas of gaps or overlaps between Townships or state boundaries). The Entity-Attribute section of this metadata describes these components in greater detail.
https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The global land survey equipment system market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing need for precise land measurement and mapping across diverse sectors. The construction boom in developing economies, coupled with expanding infrastructure projects globally, fuels demand for sophisticated surveying equipment. Furthermore, advancements in technology, such as the integration of GPS, LiDAR, and GIS systems, are enhancing accuracy, efficiency, and data analysis capabilities, leading to higher adoption rates. The market is segmented by application (agriculture, transportation, energy & power, mining, and others) and type (hardware, software, services), with hardware currently dominating the market share due to high demand for precision instruments like total stations, GPS receivers, and laser scanners. The software segment, however, is poised for significant growth, driven by increasing demand for data processing and analysis solutions. Geographic growth is uneven, with North America and Europe currently holding significant market shares due to advanced infrastructure and high technological adoption. However, the Asia-Pacific region, specifically China and India, is anticipated to witness substantial growth in the coming years, fueled by rapid urbanization and infrastructure development. The competitive landscape is marked by established players like Trimble, Hexagon, and Leica, alongside emerging companies offering innovative solutions and competitive pricing. While high initial investment costs for advanced equipment may present a restraint, the long-term benefits in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and reduced project timelines are expected to drive market expansion. The market is anticipated to maintain a healthy Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) through 2033, suggesting a continuously expanding opportunity. The sustained growth is also attributable to government initiatives promoting infrastructure development and digitalization in various regions. Stringent regulations related to land ownership and resource management are also contributing factors. The ongoing integration of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, into land survey equipment is likely to further enhance productivity and accuracy. This continuous technological innovation is anticipated to drive the demand for advanced software and services, fostering growth within these market segments. Furthermore, the rising adoption of cloud-based solutions for data storage and analysis will streamline workflows and improve collaboration, thereby propelling the market's overall expansion. However, challenges such as the need for skilled professionals to operate and maintain these sophisticated systems and potential economic downturns impacting infrastructure investment remain factors to consider in long-term market forecasting.
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
Point feature class and related table containing the Precise Surveys measurement time series. Measurements include elevations, Northings and Eastings, distances, and point-to-point measurements. Northing and Easting measurements are in CA State Plane Coordinate systems, Elevations measurements are provided in NAVD88 or NGVD29. This dataset is for data exploration only. These measurements and point locations are not considered survey-grade since there may be nuances such as epochs, adjustments, and measurement methods that are not fully reflected in the GIS data. These values are not considered authoritative values and should not be used in-lieu of actual surveyed values provided by a licensed land surveyor. Related data and time series are stored in a table connected to the point feature class via a relationship class. There may be multiple table entries and time series associated to a single mark. Data was assembled through an import of Excel tables and import of mark locations in ArcGIS Pro. Records were edited by DOE, Geomatics, GDSS to resolve any non-unique mark names. This dataset was last updated 4/2024.
The table Firm survey wave 1 and 2 (GIS) is part of the dataset SEDRI Ethiopia firm survey (GIS), available at https://stanford.redivis.com/datasets/rxq3-9x047we25. It contains 1585 rows across 3377 variables.