According to a survey conducted in 2022, around ** percent of the C-level executives from major companies worldwide said that their firms are incorporating the use of more sustainable materials in their sustainability efforts against climate change. Another ** percent of the executives pointed out that their companies are increasing the efficiency of energy use.

In 2022, the vast majority of consumers across the globe saw their purchasing behavior become at least a little more environmentally friendly compared to five years earlier. Specifically, over a third of surveyed shoppers noticed a modest change, while nearly 30 percent said they bought sustainable products significantly more often. Nearly one in 10 respondents even claimed they had turned around their way of life in order to be environmentally sustainable.

Sustainability premiums

As the fight against climate change becomes increasingly important, people around the world have become more willing to pay more for sustainability: in 2022, the average sustainability premium consumers around the world considered acceptable for consumer goods came to roughly 24 percent. In other words, shoppers worldwide were willing to pay up to an average of 24 percent more for sustainably produced consumer goods. Unsurprisingly, those with a higher income were willing to spend more than those with average or lower incomes.

Sustainability initiatives of brands

Many companies and brands are aware of the ongoing trend towards protecting the environment and are taking steps to promote sustainability. Allowing shoppers to easily recycle their products, as well as measuring and tracking their own emissions, are just some examples of initiatives a considerable share of brands had taken in the past couple of years.

Introduction

Green Chemicals Statistics: Green chemicals, are also known as sustainable chemicals. They are produced using methods focused on minimizing environmental impact and promoting sustainability.

They are sourced from renewable materials, naturally degrade, and do not harm human health or the environment.

These chemicals are used in various sectors, such as manufacturing, agriculture, and everyday consumer products.

Their benefits include protecting the environment, and improving safety standards. Complying with regulations, and meeting the rising demand for environmentally friendly products. In conclusion, green chemicals are crucial in advancing towards an eco-friendly and sustainable future.

According to a survey ran in October 2023, France had the highest share of active and casual lifestyle brand purchasers who were more concerned about the sustainability of products than they were the previous year, with over ************** of respondents making this claim. Germany had the lowest share with ** percent.

Sustainable Materials Management (SMM) is a systemic approach to using and reusing materials more productively over their entire lifecycles. It represents a change in how our society thinks about the use of natural resources and environmental protection. By looking at a product's entire lifecycle we can find new opportunities to reduce environmental impacts, conserve resources, and reduce costs. There are multiple challenge programs available as part of the SMM program, including the Food Recovery Challenge, the Electronics Challenge, the Federal Green Challenge, and the WasteWise program. As part of EPA's Food Recovery Challenge, organizations pledge to improve their sustainable food management practices and report their results. The SMM Electronics Challenge encourages electronics manufacturers, brand owners and retailers to strive to send 100 percent of the used electronics they collect from the public, businesses and within their own organizations to third-party certified electronics refurbishers and recyclers. The Federal Green Challenge, a national effort under the EPA’s Sustainable Materials Management Program, challenges EPA and other federal agencies throughout the country to lead by example in reducing the federal government's environmental impact. EPA’s WasteWise encourages organizations and businesses to achieve sustainability in their practices and reduce select industrial wastes. WasteWise is part of EPA’s sustainable materials management efforts, which promote the use and reuse of materials more productively over their entire lifecycles. All U.S. businesses, governments and nonprofit organizations can join WasteWise as a partner, endorser or both. Current participants range from small local governments and nonprofit organizations to large multinational corporations

The Ancillary Data portion of the Compendium of Environmental Sustainability Indicator Collections contains 38 variables (time series data on population and gross domestic product as well as region codes, land area, and waterbody area) for 238 countries. The data are taken from the UN Population Division, the World Bank, the CIA Factbook, and CIESIN's Gridded Population of the World, and are distributed by the Columbia University Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN).

Our analysis leverages data sourced from publicly available, audited information. We provide environmental and social impact data related to the UN Sustainable Development Goals for every publicly listed company alongside some private companies, with a breakdown of contribution towards all 17 SDGs for benchmarking for sustainability risk. We provide company and portfolio level data, with SDG alignment charts available for publication/marketing purposes.

This methodology has been shown to outperform other ESG data providers, as reported by TGM. It has been shown to be material for forward-looking risk and return, and independently shown to outperform other ESG data providers for ratings impacting on financial performance.

UN SDG Contribution Methodology: Environmental Impact Contribution – Measured as the proportion of SDG contribution that makes a positive impact on the environment. Social Impact Contribution – Measured as the proportion of SDG that makes a positive impact on the well-being of people and society, where the value is a proportion of a company’s revenue in % or $.

Past Use Cases: Acacia Money – SDG benchmarking for sustainability risk Fund manager climate alignment reporting EU Taxonomy alignment

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represent the world’s plan of action for social inclusion, environmental sustainability and economic development. The mining industry has an unprecedented opportunity to mobilize significant human, physical, technological and financial resources to advance the SDGs.

Mining is a global industry and is often located in remote, ecologically sensitive and less-developed areas that include many indigenous lands and territories. When managed appropriately, it can create jobs, spur innovation and bring investment and infrastructure at a game-changing scale over long time horizons. Yet, if managed poorly, mining can also lead to environmental degradation, displaced populations, inequality and increased conflict, among other challenges.

By mapping the linkages between mining and the SDGs, the aim of this Atlas is to encourage mining companies of all sizes to incorporate relevant SDGs into their business and operations, validate their current efforts and spark new ideas.

On September 22, 2012, EPA launched the SMM Electronics Challenge. The Challenge encourages electronics manufacturers, brand owners and retailers to strive to send 100 percent of the used electronics they collect from the public, businesses and within their own organizations to third-party certified electronics refurbishers and recyclers. The Challenge’s goals are to: 1). Ensure responsible recycling through the use of third-party certified recyclers, 2). Increase transparency and accountability through public posting of electronics collection and recycling data, and 3). Encourage outstanding performance through awards and recognition. By striving to send 100 percent of used electronics collected to certified recyclers and refurbishers, Challenge participants are ensuring that the used electronics they collect will be responsibly managed by recyclers that maximize reuse and recycling, minimize exposure to human health and the environment, ensure the safe management of materials by downstream handlers, and require destruction of all data on used electronics. Electronics Challenge participants are publicly recognized on EPA's website as a registrant, new participant, or active participant. Awards are offered in two categories - tier and champion. Tier awards are given in recognition of achieving all the requirements under a gold, silver or bronze tier. Champion awards are given in two categories - product and non-product. For champion awards, a product is an item that is manufactured, developed or refined for sale and is in the marketplace; while a non-product is an internal or external plan, strategy or policy for an organization, as well as a service, program or item that is intended for individual sale to a consumer. The Electronics Challenge is part of EPA's larger SMM program (https://www.epa.gov/smm). Sustainable Materials Management (SMM) is a systemic approach to using and reusing materials more productively over their entire lifecycles. It represents a change in how our society thinks about the use of natural resources and environmental protection. By looking at a product's entire lifecycle we can find new opportunities to reduce environmental impacts, conserve resources, and reduce costs. There are multiple challenge programs available as part of the SMM program, including the Food Recovery Challenge, the Electronics Challenge, the Federal Green Challenge, and the WasteWise program.

Green Data Center Market Outlook

The global green data center market size was estimated at approximately USD 53 billion in 2023, and it is projected to reach an impressive USD 145 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 12%. This robust growth is driven by increasing demands for energy-efficient infrastructure, coupled with heightened regulatory pressures to reduce carbon footprints across all industries. As organizations worldwide become more environmentally conscious, the adoption of green data centers is becoming an essential component of their corporate social responsibility strategies. These centers help in minimizing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, while simultaneously lowering operational costs through innovative cooling solutions and sustainable energy sources.

One of the primary growth drivers for the green data center market is the escalating environmental concerns and regulatory mandates that push for energy-efficient solutions. Governments and environmental bodies across the globe have been introducing stringent regulations regarding energy consumption and carbon emissions, which has prompted organizations to shift towards sustainable data center solutions. Moreover, the rising cost of electricity and the increasing demand for data storage and processing power are encouraging companies to adopt innovative solutions that enhance energy efficiency. This trend is further fueled by advancements in technology that enable the deployment of high-performance, energy-efficient computing equipment, reducing the environmental impact of data centers.

Another significant factor contributing to the market's growth is the rapid digitization and increasing reliance on cloud services, big data, and IoT applications. As businesses continue to digitize their operations, the demand for data centers has surged, necessitating greater storage capacities and efficient data management solutions. Green data centers, with their sustainable energy usage and reduced carbon footprints, provide the ideal solution for companies looking to align their technological growth with environmental sustainability. Furthermore, the use of renewable energy resources, such as solar and wind power, is becoming increasingly common, allowing data centers to operate with minimal impact on the environment while also providing cost savings in energy expenditure.

The emergence of innovative cooling technologies, such as liquid cooling and free cooling, also plays a pivotal role in the growth of the green data center market. Traditional data centers are often burdened with high energy costs due to inefficient cooling systems. However, advances in cooling technologies have significantly reduced energy consumption, enabling data centers to operate more sustainably. Organizations are increasingly adopting these advanced solutions to optimize their energy consumption and reduce their environmental impact. Additionally, the incorporation of AI and machine learning technologies to monitor and manage data center operations has further enhanced efficiency, enabling predictive maintenance and optimizing energy usage.

Regionally, North America is expected to hold a substantial share of the green data center market, driven by early technology adoption and strong regulatory frameworks promoting sustainability. Europe follows closely, with the EU's stringent environmental policies providing a robust impetus for the development of green data centers. The Asia Pacific region is anticipated to witness the fastest growth over the forecast period, due to significant investments in IT infrastructure and increasing awareness of environmental sustainability. In contrast, the Middle East & Africa and Latin America are gradually emerging markets, with growing awareness and adoption of green practices in the data center industry, albeit at a slower pace compared to their global counterparts.

Component Analysis

The green data center market can be segmented into components comprising solutions and services. Solutions in the green data center space encompass energy-efficient infrastructure, encompassing advanced cooling technologies, energy management systems, and the integration of renewable energy sources. These solutions are designed to optimize the energy usage of data centers, thereby reducing operational costs and minimizing environmental impact. With the need for sustainable practices becoming more urgent, organizations are increasingly investing in these solutions to align with their corporate responsibility goals. The solutions segment is witnessing rapid technological advancements, with the devel

The 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI) is a measure of overall progress towards environmental sustainability, developed for 146 countries. The index provides a composite profile of national environmental stewardship based on a compilation of 21 indicators derived from 76 underlying data sets. The 2005 version of the ESI represents a significant update and improvement on earlier versions; the country ESI scores or rankings should not be compared to earlier versions because of changes to the methodology and underlying data. The index was unveiled at the World Economic Forum's annual meeting, January 2005, Davos, Switzerland. The 2005 ESI is a joint product of the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy (YCELP) and the Columbia University Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), in collaboration with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission.

With consumers placing increasing importance on companies’ environmental credentials, what are UK retailers doing to make their operations more sustainable?

This dataset provides information from 99 federal organizations, detailing their departmental actions that contribute to advancing the goals, targets, and implementation strategies of the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy (FSDS). The data includes various actions taken by these organizations to support sustainability initiatives across the federal government.

In 2021, 18 percent of respondents from a global Capgemini study indicate having a sustainable IT strategy with well-defined goals and target timelines in their organization. In comparison, 50 percent of respondents state having an enterprise-wide sustainability strategy. The insurance and banking industry are leading in terms of sustainable IT strategy.

The Ancillary Data portion of the Compendium of Environmental Sustainability Indicator Collections contains 38 variables (time series data on population and gross domestic product as well as region codes, land area, and waterbody area) for 238 countries. The data are taken from the UN Population Division, the World Bank, the CIA Factbook, and CIESIN's Gridded Population of the World, and are distributed by the Columbia University Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN).

With the SFTool API, you can access a myriad of high performance building information. Pull the most up to date information about green products, services, and materials. Put sustainable strategies in the hands of your audience today. All of our API methods are HTTP GET and always return the latest data. Whether you’re looking to add sustainable building information to your website or blog, or looking for data to build an application, the SFTool API is here for you.Making API calls is very straightforward. There is a single base URI for each data category. By default, it will return all of the data for that category. By using any of our optional parameters, you can filter the data as you see fit. Signup for free to get the SFTool API key at https://api.data.gov/signup/.

The Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) Annual Report (AR) datasets contain the following data submitted by Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSA) and Alternative Agencies as part of their GSP AR or Alternative to GSP AR: groundwater extraction, surface water supply, total water use, and change in storage volumes for a given water year. All data was originally submitted to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) through the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) Portal’s AR Modules (https://sgma.water.ca.gov/portal/gspar/submitted and https://sgma.water.ca.gov/portal/alternative/annualreport/submitted). Data records within each dataset correspond to either an entire basin or one of multiple GSP areas which collectively correspond to an entire basin.

The GSP Regulations established the AR data requirements (23 CCR § 356.2) and tasked DWR with developing an online reporting system for GSAs and Alternative Agencies to electronically submit these data (23 CCR § 353.2). The data fields associated with these datasets were created by DWR to ensure GSAs and Alternative Agencies electronically submitted the required AR data to DWR’s online reporting system, the SGMA Portal (https://sgma.water.ca.gov/portal/). For additional information regarding the AR Modules and the AR submittal process, please view the DWR’s AR resources (https://sgma.water.ca.gov/portal/resources).

OverviewThis dataset assesses countries' progress on the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), adopted by UN Member States in 2015. Derived from the annual Sustainable Development Report, it provides structured data for analyzing global and national SDG performance, trends, and challenges.PurposeThe primary purpose of this dataset is to facilitate in-depth analysis, research, and policy-making related to sustainable development. It enables users to track progress, identify areas requiring greater attention, compare national performances, and support evidence-based interventions for achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.Data CoverageGeographical Scope: Covers all 193 United Nations Member States.Temporal Coverage: Data is available annually since the adoption of the SDGs in 2015, up to the latest published report year.Goals and Indicators: Encompasses all 17 Sustainable Development Goals, with data presented across numerous indicators (approximately 125 unique indicators) used to measure progress under each goal. GOAL 1: No PovertyGOAL 2: Zero HungerGOAL 3: Good Health and Well-beingGOAL 4: Quality EducationGOAL 5: Gender EqualityGOAL 6: Clean Water and SanitationGOAL 7: Affordable and Clean EnergyGOAL 8: Decent Work and Economic GrowthGOAL 9: Industry, Innovation and InfrastructureGOAL 10: Reduced InequalityGOAL 11: Sustainable Cities and CommunitiesGOAL 12: Responsible Consumption and ProductionGOAL 13: Climate ActionGOAL 14: Life Below WaterGOAL 15: Life on LandGOAL 16: Peace and Justice Strong InstitutionsGOAL 17: Partnerships to achieve the GoalData Points and MetricsThe dataset includes various metrics for each country, SDG, and indicator:SDG Index Scores: Overall scores reflecting a country's aggregate performance across all SDGs.Individual SDG Scores/Performance: Scores and ratings for each of the 17 individual SDGs, indicating how well a country is performing on specific goals.Indicator-Level Data: Raw values for the underlying indicators that comprise the SDG scores.Trends: Trends indicating whether a country is on track, moderately improving, stagnating, or decreasing on specific goals and indicators.Traffic Light System Ratings: A color-coded rating (green, yellow, orange, red) indicating a country's status on achieving each SDG.Data Sources and MethodologyThe data is compiled by independent experts and draws from a wide range of official and non-official data sources, including international organizations (e.g., World Bank, WHO, UNESCO), research institutions, and national statistical offices. The methodology for calculating the SDG Index and individual goal scores involves normalization, aggregation, and imputation techniques to ensure comparability across countries and over time. Full methodological details are typically provided in accompanying documentation (e.g., Codebook and Methodology Report) available with the downloadable dataset.Potential UsesAcademic research and statistical analysis on sustainable development.Policy formulation and review by governments and international bodies.Monitoring and evaluation of SDG implementation.Educational purposes and public awareness campaigns.Development of visualizations and interactive dashboards.Access and DownloadThe complete dataset, along with the full report, codebook, and methodological explanations, is typically available for free download from the official Sustainable Development Report website. Users are encouraged to refer to the source website for the most up-to-date versions and supporting documentation.

This publication gives statistics on the uptake of actions in agreements that were live as of 1st October 2024. The data does not include any agreements that went live after 1st October 2024 or any new Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) agreements that will go live in 2024. Information about the Sustainable Farming Incentive scheme is also available on the farming blog: The Sustainable Farming Incentive - Farming (blog.gov.uk)

The “summary” table shows the papers and names of the tools and the link to the main publication as well as the use of the paper in each part of the analysis. We presented the variables for all the methods in a table called “method” with the result of the classification. In the table “dimension”, we presented the extraction of the dimension of sustainability and classification of methods. We did the same for the “themes” with a colour that we used for providing the descriptive statistics on the number of themes per dimension. We used three tables for each indicator that present the name of the indicator as extracted in the publication.