Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Zip file containing all data and analysis files for Experiment 1 in:Weiers, H., Inglis, M., & Gilmore, C. (under review). Learning artificial number symbols with ordinal and magnitude information.Article abstractThe question of how numerical symbols gain semantic meaning is a key focus of mathematical cognition research. Some have suggested that symbols gain meaning from magnitude information, by being mapped onto the approximate number system, whereas others have suggested symbols gain meaning from their ordinal relations to other symbols. Here we used an artificial symbol learning paradigm to investigate the effects of magnitude and ordinal information on number symbol learning. Across two experiments, we found that after either magnitude or ordinal training, adults successfully learned novel symbols and were able to infer their ordinal and magnitude meanings. Furthermore, adults were able to make relatively accurate judgements about, and map between, the novel symbols and non-symbolic quantities (dot arrays). Although both ordinal and magnitude training was sufficient to attach meaning to the symbols, we found beneficial effects on the ability to learn and make numerical judgements about novel symbols when combining small amounts of magnitude information for a symbol subset with ordinal information about the whole set. These results suggest that a combination of magnitude and ordinal information is a plausible account of the symbol learning process.© The Authors
AviationQA is introduced in the paper titled- There is No Big Brother or Small Brother: Knowledge Infusion in Language Models for Link Prediction and Question Answering
The paper is accepted in the main conference of ICON 2022.
We create a synthetic dataset, AviationQA, a set of 1 million factoid QA pairs from 12,000 National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) reports using templates. These QA pairs contain questions such that answers to them are entities occurring in the AviationKG (Agarwal et al., 2022). AviationQA will be helpful to researchers in finding insights into aircraft accidents and their prevention.
Examples from dataset:
What was the Aircraft Damage of the accident no. ERA22LA162? Answer: Substantial
Where was the Destination of the accident no. ERA22LA162?, Answer: Naples, GA (APH)
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This is the updated version CSE-CIC-IDS 2018 dataset. The data is normalised and 1 new class "Comb" which is a combination of existing attacks is added.
To cite the dataset, please reference the original paper with DOI: 10.1109/SmartNets61466.2024.10577645. The paper is published in IEEE SmartNets and can be accessed here.
Citation info:
Madhubalan, Akshayraj & Gautam, Amit & Tiwary, Priya. (2024). Blender-GAN: Multi-Target Conditional Generative Adversarial Network for Novel Class Synthetic Data Generation. 1-7. 10.1109/SmartNets61466.2024.10577645.
This dataset was made by Abluva Inc, a Palo Alto based, research-driven Data Protection firm. Our data protection platform empowers customers to secure data through advanced security mechanisms such as Fine Grained Access control and sophisticated depersonalization algorithms (e.g. Pseudonymization, Anonymization and Randomization). Abluva's Data Protection solutions facilitate data democratization within and outside the organizations, mitigating the concerns related to theft and compliance. The innovative intrusion detection algorithm by Abluva employs patented technologies for an intricately balanced approach that excludes normal access deviations, ensuring intrusion detection without disrupting the business operations. Abluva’s Solution enables organizations to extract further value from their data by enabling secure Knowledge Graphs and deploying Secure Data as a Service among other novel uses of data. Committed to providing a safe and secure environment, Abluva empowers organizations to unlock the full potential of their data.
This repository contains the supplementary data to our contribution "Particle Detection by means of Neural Networks and Synthetic Training Data Refinement in Defocusing Particle Tracking Velocimetry" to the 2022 Measurement Science and Technology special issue on the topic “Machine Learning and Data Assimilation techniques for fluid flow measurements”. This data includes annotated images used for the training of neural networks for particle detection on DPTV recordings as well as unannotated particle images used for training of the image-to-image translation networks for the generation of refined synthetic training data, as presented in the manuscript. The neural networks for particle detection trained on the aforementioned data are contained in this repository as well. An explanation on the use of this data and the trained neural networks, containing an example script can be found on GitHub (https://github.com/MaxDreisbach/DPTV_ML_Particle_detection)
This dataset includes files for HELIOS++ (version 1.1.0)
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Zip file containing all data and analysis files for Experiment 1 in:Weiers, H., Inglis, M., & Gilmore, C. (under review). Learning artificial number symbols with ordinal and magnitude information.Article abstractThe question of how numerical symbols gain semantic meaning is a key focus of mathematical cognition research. Some have suggested that symbols gain meaning from magnitude information, by being mapped onto the approximate number system, whereas others have suggested symbols gain meaning from their ordinal relations to other symbols. Here we used an artificial symbol learning paradigm to investigate the effects of magnitude and ordinal information on number symbol learning. Across two experiments, we found that after either magnitude or ordinal training, adults successfully learned novel symbols and were able to infer their ordinal and magnitude meanings. Furthermore, adults were able to make relatively accurate judgements about, and map between, the novel symbols and non-symbolic quantities (dot arrays). Although both ordinal and magnitude training was sufficient to attach meaning to the symbols, we found beneficial effects on the ability to learn and make numerical judgements about novel symbols when combining small amounts of magnitude information for a symbol subset with ordinal information about the whole set. These results suggest that a combination of magnitude and ordinal information is a plausible account of the symbol learning process.© The Authors