It is a dual function database that associates an informatics database to a structural database of known and potential drug targets. PDTD is a comprehensive, web-accessible database of drug targets, and focuses on those drug targets with known 3D-structures. PDTD contains 1207 entries covering 841 known and potential drug targets with structures from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Drug targets of PDTD were categorized into 15 and 13 types according to two criteria: therapeutic areas and biochemical criteria. The database supports extensive searching function using PDB ID, target name and category, related disease.

Target store USA products dataset having 168 records with 24 datapoint.

Datapoints: title url brand main_image sku description raw_description gtin13 currency price availability availableDeliveryMethod available_branch primary_category sub_category_1 sub_category_2 sub_category_3 images raw_specifications specifications highlights raw_highlights uniq_id scraped_at

• Target products dataset in CSV format
• Extracted all common fields from target product details page

Get complete dataset from crawl feeds over more than 800K+ records

Toxin and Toxin Target Database (T3DB) is a bioinformatics resource that combines detailed toxin data with comprehensive toxin target information.

Information for how to cite the MTE bundle.

A database of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Users can search by genes, chromosomes, and keywords. The coAnsensus domain analysis tool functions to identify conserved protein domains and GO terms among selected TAG genes, while the “oncogenic domain analysis” can analyze oncogenic potential of any user-provided protein based on a weighed term frequency table calculated from the TAG proteins. The completion of human genome sequences allows one to rapidly identify and analyze genes of interest through the use of computational approach. The available annotations including physical characterization and functional domains of known tumor-related genes thus can be used to study the role of genes involved in carcinogenesis. The tumor-associated gene (TAG) database was designed to utilize information from well-characterized oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes to facilitate cancer research. All target genes were identified through text-mining approach from the PubMed database. A semi-automatic information retrieving engine was built to collect specific information of these target genes from various resources and store in the TAG database. At current stage, 519 TAGs including 198 oncogenes, 170 tumor suppressor genes, and 151 genes related to oncogenesis were collected. Information collected in TAG database can be browsed through user-friendly web interfaces that provide searching genes by chromosome or by keywords. The “consensus domain analysis” tool functions to identify conserved protein domains and GO terms among selected TAG genes. In addition, the “oncogenic domain analysis” can analyze oncogenic potential of any user-provided protein based on a weighed term frequency table calculated from the TAG proteins. This study was supported by grant from National research program for genomic medicine (NRPGM) and personnel from Bioinformatics Center of Center for Biotechnology and Biosciences in the National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan.

Context

Founded in 1902, Target has grown to become the second-largest discount retailer in the United States. The company currently has 1829 locations throughout the United States

Content

This dataset includes a record for Target location currently in operation as of April 2017. Columns include location data (address, Lat/Lon), store open date, last remodel date, capabilities (integrated Starbucks, CVS, etc.) and several other interesting data points.

Acknowledgements

I utilized Python’s Requests library to scrape this data from Target’s store locator.

Inspiration

I enjoy plotting geographical data! When I was looking through the data that Target’s store locator returned, I thought others might find it useful, and decided to scrape and clean it into a useful dataset.

Drug repositioning has shorter developmental time, lower cost and less safety risk than traditional drug development process. The current study aims to repurpose marketed drugs and clinical candidates for new indications in diabetes treatment by mining clinical ‘omics’ data. We analyzed data from genome wide association studies (GWAS), proteomics and metabolomics studies and revealed a total of 992 proteins as potential anti-diabetic targets in human. Information on the drugs that target these 992 proteins was retrieved from the Therapeutic Target Database (TTD) and 108 of these proteins are drug targets with drug projects information. Research and preclinical drug targets were excluded and 35 of the 108 proteins were selected as druggable proteins. Among them, five proteins were known targets for treating diabetes. Based on the pathogenesis knowledge gathered from the OMIM and PubMed databases, 12 protein targets of 58 drugs were found to have a new indication for treating diabetes. CMap (connectivity map) was used to compare the gene expression patterns of cells treated by these 58 drugs and that of cells treated by known anti-diabetic drugs or diabetes risk causing compounds. As a result, 9 drugs were found to have the potential to treat diabetes. Among the 9 drugs, 4 drugs (diflunisal, nabumetone, niflumic acid and valdecoxib) targeting COX2 (prostaglandin G/H synthase 2) were repurposed for treating type 1 diabetes, and 2 drugs (phenoxybenzamine and idazoxan) targeting ADRA2A (Alpha-2A adrenergic receptor) had a new indication for treating type 2 diabetes. These findings indicated that ‘omics’ data mining based drug repositioning is a potentially powerful tool to discover novel anti-diabetic indications from marketed drugs and clinical candidates. Furthermore, the results of our study could be related to other disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease.

TargetDB, a target registration database, provides information on the experimental progress and status of targets selected for structure determination. Search sequences from the PSI Structural Genomics Centers and other Structural Genomics projects.For more information about how these proteins were cloned, expressed, purified, or other experimental protocols please go to the Protein expression, purification, and crystallization DataBase.

Protein Structure Initiative - TargetTrack protein target registration database (795 MB, gzipped tarball)

The Protein Structure Initiative was a high-throughput structural genomics effort from 2000-2015 focused on developing technologies to enable greater coverage of protein structure space. Over its 15-year tenure, over 100 investigators at 35 centers (see ContributingCenters.xls) declared over 350,000 protein sequences (targets) that they would study using state-of-the-art protein production and structure determination methods. Many of these targets were selected through bioinformatics-based methods to serve as representatives for sequence and structure clusters.

From 2003-2010, these selected sequences and some basic identifying metadata were kept in a database called TargetDB, created at the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics at Rutgers University. In 2008, a second database named PepcDB was created to track detailed experimental trial history and the standard protocols used by the PSI centers. These two databases became the principal structural genomics target databases, and were rolled into the PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase in 2008.

As part of the third phase of the PSI, TargetDB and PepcDB were merged into a single resource, TargetTrack, to facilitate one-stop access to the data as well as expanding the schema to include new required data items. Participating centers deposited the latest status on their active targets and the protocols that were used (along with any deviations) on a weekly or quarterly basis. TargetTrack provided a variety of pre-computed data downloads on a weekly basis as well.

In July 2017, the Structural Biology Knowledgebase ceased operations. The files provided in this tarball represent the final datafiles generated by TargetTrack (timestamp June 30, 2017). Please read the README included in this dataset for descriptions of each file.

The entire TargetTrack datafile in XML format can be found in /TargetTrack XML files/tt.xml.gz

Key documentation can be found in the /Documentation folder.
TargetTrack schema: targetTrack-v1.4.1.pdf
Spreadsheet with TargetTrack enumerations for relevant fields: targetTrackEnumeratedDataItems-v1.4.1-1.xls
Image depicted the XML data schema: targetTrack-v1.4.1.jpg

These files are 868 MB in total size, uncompressed.
To open the tarball, use the command 'tar -zxvf TargetTrack-1Jul2017.tar.gz'

-- created by the PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase, July 5, 2017

Comprehensive dataset containing 11 verified Target locations in New Hampshire, United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.

Summary of MER contact science (CS) activities and targets. Localization information in Site Frame and within identifying images are provided where information was available. Contact science refers to analyses conducted by instruments deployed using the Instrument Deployment Device (IDD).

Target Stores Export Import Data. Follow the Eximpedia platform for HS code, importer-exporter records, and customs shipment details.

The dataset contains input and target variables for Waste-to-DME plant scenarios that were used to develop artificial neural networks. Applied waste types: (1) the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), (2) sewage sludge (SS).

Target genes of transcription factors from published ChIP-chip, ChIP-seq, and other transcription factor binding site profiling studies

The Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) Index table was created for the purpose of providing a concise and easily accessible tracking of RXTE observations, both those already completed and those still scheduled to be done. Each entry in this table corresponds to a specific proposal/target combination or complete observation', in contrast to the RXTE Master table in which each entry corresponds to a specific proposal/target/ObsID combination orobserving segment'. A complete observation can consist of many (in some cases dozens) observing segments. This is a service provided by NASA HEASARC .

Comprehensive dataset containing 598 verified Target Optical locations in United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.

Dataset

This dataset was created by Kavya S

Released under Apache 2.0

Contents

Unconventional epitopes presented by HLA class I complexes are emerging targets for T cell targeted immunotherapies. Their identification by mass spectrometry required development of novel methods to cope with the large number of theoretical candidates. Methods to identify post-translationally spliced peptides led to a broad range of outcomes. We here investigated the impact of three common database search engines – i.e. Mascot, Mascot+Percolator and PEAKS DB – as final identification step, as well as the features of target database on the ability to correctly identify non-spliced and cis-spliced peptides. We used ground truth datasets measured by mass spectrometry to benchmark methods’ performance and extended the analysis to HLA class I immunopeptidomes. PEAKS DB showed better precision and recall of cis-spliced peptides and larger number of identified peptides in HLA class I immunopeptidomes than the other search engine strategies. The better performance of PEAKS DB appears to result from better discrimination between target and decoy hits and hence a more robust FDR estimation, and seems independent to peptide and spectrum features here investigated. Head of the research group Molecular Immunology at King’s College London and the Francis Crick Institute, London (UK). Email: michele.mishto@kcl.ac.uk,

Target fishing is the process of identifying the protein target of a bioactive small molecule. To do so experimentally requires a significant investment of time and resources, which can be expedited with a reliable computational target fishing model. The development of computational target fishing models using machine learning has become very popular over the last several years because of the increased availability of large amounts of public bioactivity data. Unfortunately, the applicability and performance of such models for natural products has not yet been comprehensively assessed. This is, in part, due to the relative lack of bioactivity data available for natural products compared to synthetic compounds. Moreover, the databases commonly used to train such models do not annotate which compounds are natural products, which makes the collection of a benchmarking set difficult. To address this knowledge gap, a data set composed of natural product structures and their associated protein targets was generated by cross-referencing 20 publicly available natural product databases with the bioactivity database ChEMBL. This data set contains 5589 compound–target pairs for 1943 unique compounds and 1023 unique targets. A synthetic data set comprising 107 190 compound–target pairs for 88 728 unique compounds and 1907 unique targets was used to train k-nearest neighbors, random forest, and multilayer perceptron models. The predictive performance of each model was assessed by stratified 10-fold cross-validation and benchmarking on the newly collected natural product data set. Strong performance was observed for each model during cross-validation with area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) scores ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 and Boltzmann-enhanced discrimination of receiver operating characteristic (BEDROC) scores from 0.89 to 0.94. When tested on the natural product data set, performance dramatically decreased with AUROC scores ranging from 0.70 to 0.85 and BEDROC scores from 0.43 to 0.59. However, the implementation of a model stacking approach, which uses logistic regression as a meta-classifier to combine model predictions, dramatically improved the ability to correctly predict the protein targets of natural products and increased the AUROC score to 0.94 and BEDROC score to 0.73. This stacked model was deployed as a web application, called STarFish, and has been made available for use to aid in target identification for natural products.

🇺🇸 미국