In early April, claiming to boost the country's domestic economy, President Trump made an executive order to implement new, widespread tariffs. In addition to the 10 percent baseline tariff imposed on all U.S. imports, Trump also announced specific tariffs on a number of important trading partners, such as the European Union, China, and Vietnam, which account for over 40 percent of all U.S. imports. According to a survey taken just after the announcement, roughly 20 percent of surveyed Americans were planning to make purchases because they expected prices to increase as a result of the tariffs.

This dataset is the current 2025 Harmonized Tariff Schedule plus all revisions for the current year. It provides the applicable tariff rates and statistical categories for all merchandise imported into the United States; it is based on the international Harmonized System, the global system of nomenclature that is used to describe most world trade in goods.

Explore Trump's announcement of new 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, marking a significant shift in US trade policy.

In 2025, President Trump announced plans to implement a universal baseline tariff of 10 percent. Estimates show that a 10 percent universal tariff on imported goods would raise U.S. revenue by 2.95 trillion U.S. dollars, while a 20 percent tariff would raise revenue by 2.62 trillion U.S. dollars. Comparatively, imports before Trump's proposed taxes would increase revenue by 3.28 trillion U.S. dollars. By enacting tariffs on all imports, significantly less foreign-produced goods would be purchased, thus decreasing the overall amount of imported goods.

Copper futures surged 17% following Trump's 50% tariff on imports, affecting global markets and highlighting national security concerns.

This dataset shows active grain (corn, soybeans, wheat, and sorghum) rail tariff rates to the Mexico border for a number of U.S. locations, border crossings, car types, and shipment sizes for BNSF, Union Pacific, and Kansas City Southern (KCS). These rates are Rule 11 rates, where a through rate from a U.S. origin to a Mexico destination is divided into a rate from a U.S. origin to the border and a rate from the border to a Mexico destination. The U.S. railroads began reporting only Rule 11 rates to the border in January 2022 following the implementation of a VAT tax on the Mexican portion of the rail shipment. This dataset only contains rates on the U.S. to-the-border portion of the shipment.

The rates are collected from the BNSF, UP, and KCS websites. The railroads do not update the tariffs on defined interval, but do typically have at least one update a year before that commodity's harvest season. The tariff rates are joined to fuel surcharges that are updated monthly. A row in the dataset represents the active tariff rate for that shipment type (route, size, etc.) and the fuel surcharge for that railroad in a particular month. In the case where a tariff rate is changed mid-month, the row is an average of any rates that were active during that month.

Fuel surcharges are published by the railroads on a monthly, per-mile basis and are collected separately from the tariff documents (See USDA's fuel surcharge data at https://agtransport.usda.gov/d/f883-g4tq). To compute a per car fuel surcharge, the U.S. origin to the border rail route distance is approximated using the Department of Transportation's National Rail Network Lines (NARL) dataset and a shortest-path computation.

KCS is now CPKC, but KCS rates are still reported separately at https://web.kcsouthern.com/AgricultureTariff/Default.aspx.

The dataset is intended to capture most of the published tariffs for corn, soybean, and wheat shipments to Mexico. However, some routes and tariff updates may not be included.

Based on information released from White House with detailed information about the trade between US and the rest of countries. You will find the relevant information for each country, including Exports, Imports and Deficit (or surplus).

Version 2 includes population (if data is available). Figures gathered from https://datahub.io/core/population

The majority of businesses in Japan were affected by the tariffs announced by the Trump administration, according to a survey conducted in April 2025. While **** percent of respondents stated that they would reduce their exports to the United States from overseas branches, the share that planned a reduction of exports from Japan was ********************.

This dataset contains historical monthly (from June 2010 to April 2025) rail tariff rates by railroad, commodity (corn, soybeans, and wheat), and train type, for select origin/destination pairs.

Beginning May 2025, upgraded monthly tariff data are published here: https://agtransport.usda.gov/d/3az4-jkr6. The upgrade almost doubles the number of published rates, from 38 origin-destination-railroad combinations to 70. Most of the new data go back to at least January 2022.

In early April, claiming to boost the country's domestic economy, President Trump made an executive order to implement new, widespread tariffs. In addition to the 10 percent baseline tariff imposed on all U.S. imports, Trump also announced specific tariffs on a number of important trading partners, such as the European Union, China, and Vietnam, which account for over 40 percent of all U.S. imports. The baseline tariffs are set to go into effect on April 5, and the customized tariffs April 9.

This dataset is restricted, for more information please contact the author. Data were collected from multiple sources:The Electricity & Co-Generation Regulatory AuthoritySaudi Electricity companyWeb news article (2015, December 28). Increase of Fuel, Electricity and Water prices. Retrieved from https://akhbaar24.argaam.com/article/detail/255091accessed on March 22, 2018.In October 1984, the government adopted a Tariff that increased with increasing consumption. The changes of Tariffs started in November 1984.Tariff approved by Council of Ministries 170 and become effective in October 2000. This Tariff remained effective for approximately ten years The residential, agricultural, mosques, and charitable societies remained unchanged till 2018In 2010, a new tariff for government, commercial, and industrial consumption came into force, this was adopted by a decision of ECRA's board, to set tariffs for non-residential consumption with an upper limit of SR0.26/kWh.In 2015, the total value of electricity consumed by the residential sector was worth about 38 billion U.S. dollars.In 2018, the Council of Ministers has approved gradual revision of energy prices in the Kingdom including changes to electricity tariffs effective from Jan. 1. 2018, the Electricity and Cogeneration Regulatory Authority (ECRA) announced that new prices will take effect on January 1st, 2018.source: ECRACitation: Alghamdi, Abeer. 2018. “Changes in Saudi Arabia Electricity Prices.” [dataset]. https://datasource.kapsarc.org/explore/dataset/electricity-prices-in-saudi-arabia/information/.

U.S. President Donald Trump will soon announce tariff rates on imported semiconductors, affecting the booming global market.

This data package includes the underlying data to replicate the charts, tables, and calculations presented in The US Revenue Implications of President Trump’s 2025 Tariffs, PIIE Briefing 25-2.

If you use the data, please cite as:

McKibbin, Warwick, and Geoffrey Shuetrim. 2025. The US Revenue Implications of President Trump’s 2025 Tariffs. PIIE Briefing 25-2. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

This message pertains to imports of barley products classified under Customs Tariff headings: 11.02, 11.03, 11.04, 11.07, 11.08, 19.01, 19.04 and 23.02. Further to our message dated 2021-11-23, by which the close date initially announced for 2021-11-22 was extended by means of exceptional shipment-specific permits for the reason explained therein, the purpose of this message is to inform you that the 2021-2022 Barley Products Tariff Rate Quota will be filled as of 11:59 pm local time on 2022-01-06. Applications for shipment-specific permits, other than those under a supplemental authorization, will no longer be accepted after that time.

With Falguni Desai, Sr. Strategy Advisor in Banking & Capital Markets at Microsoft, explore strategies for banks across various divisions to navigate tariff uncertainty.

In early April, claiming to boost the country's domestic economy, President Trump made an executive order to implement new, widespread tariffs. In addition to the 10 percent baseline tariff imposed on all U.S. imports, Trump also announced specific tariffs on a number of important trading partners, such as the European Union, China, and Vietnam, which account for over 40 percent of all U.S. imports. As of April 3, the day he announced the tariffs, over half of surveyed Americans disapproved of Trump's actions, with 40 percent strongly disapproving and 11 percent only somewhat disapproving.

This study will analyse the potential economic impact of a lack of the Trade Continuity Agreement between Canada and the United Kingdom when the United Kingdom would no longer be a legal party to Canada-EU treaties, including CETA as of January 1, 2021. In the absence of a transitional agreement or a trade agreement between Canada and the United Kingdom, bilateral trade between the two countries would be governed by WTO rules alone, and the goods trade between Canada and the United Kingdom would be subject to WTO most-favoured nation (MFN) duties. Neither Canada nor the United Kingdom would continue to benefit from the preferential market access currently provided for under CETA. In May 2020, the United Kingdom announced the applied MFN tariff schedule referred to as the UK Global Tariff (UKGT), which would take effect after the post-Brexit transition period. The United Kingdom’s bound tariff rates—the highest tariffs that the United Kingdom could apply—have not yet been certified at the WTO. The proposed bound tariffs are almost identical to the EU’s Common External Tariffs (CET). The analysis that follows explores the economic implications of the two scenarios where Canada-U.K. trade reverts to MFN conditions: the U.K. applied tariffs (UKGT) and the U.K. bound tariffs (EU CET). The benefits from increased certainty for the services sectors under CETA would also be removed.