Uzbekistan Population: Tashkent City data was reported at 2,464.900 Person th in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 2,424.100 Person th for 2016. Uzbekistan Population: Tashkent City data is updated yearly, averaging 2,206.300 Person th from Dec 1999 (Median) to 2017, with 19 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2,464.900 Person th in 2017 and a record low of 2,135.400 Person th in 2003. Uzbekistan Population: Tashkent City data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.G002: Population: by Region.

Uzbekistan Employment: Tashkent data was reported at 1,289.600 Person th in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 1,287.600 Person th for 2016. Uzbekistan Employment: Tashkent data is updated yearly, averaging 1,111.550 Person th from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1,289.600 Person th in 2017 and a record low of 895.800 Person th in 2000. Uzbekistan Employment: Tashkent data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.G007: Employment: by Region.

Uzbekistan Population: Urban: Tashkent data was reported at 1,411.500 Person th in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 1,381.100 Person th for 2016. Uzbekistan Population: Urban: Tashkent data is updated yearly, averaging 1,278.300 Person th from Dec 1999 (Median) to 2017, with 19 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1,411.500 Person th in 2017 and a record low of 949.700 Person th in 1999. Uzbekistan Population: Urban: Tashkent data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.G002: Population: by Region.

Uzbekistan Population: Tashkent data was reported at 2,861.200 Person th in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 2,829.300 Person th for 2016. Uzbekistan Population: Tashkent data is updated yearly, averaging 2,552.600 Person th from Dec 1999 (Median) to 2017, with 19 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2,861.200 Person th in 2017 and a record low of 2,350.200 Person th in 1999. Uzbekistan Population: Tashkent data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.G002: Population: by Region.

Abstract

The 2002 Uzbekistan Health Examination Survey (UHES) was a nationally representative population and health examination survey carried out by the Analytical and Information Center of the Ministry of Health.

The principal objectives of the 2002 UHES were to provide current and reliable data and statistic indicators on reproductive health practices, infant and child mortality, and selected biometric indicators of the health of women age 15-49, men age 15-59, and children less than five years of age at the national level, and for urban and rural areas.

Geographic coverage

National coverage

Analysis unit

• Household
• Individual
• Children age 0-5
• Woman age 15-49
• Man age 15-59

Universe

The population covered by the 2002 UHES was defined as the universe of all women age 15-49, men age 15-59, and children less than five years of age residing in private households.

Sampling procedure

The sample was designed to provide demographic and health indicators, including fertility and childhood mortality rates, at the national level and for urban and rural areas. The sample design specified a target of 800 female respondents in each of the five sampling regions. In addition, on request of the Ministry of Health and UNICEF, the Autonomous Republic of Karakalpakstan and Ferghana Oblast were over sampled to provide approximately 800 women in each, yielding a target sample size of approximately 5,600 women. Fertility rates and other indicators were estimated for the regions.

A weighted, multistage, stratified, cluster sampling design was employed. In total, 219 sample clusters were selected for the sample (101 in urban areas and 118 in rural areas). Then, a household list- ing operation was conducted in each sample cluster. The final selection of approximately 20 households per cluster was made at survey headquarters in Tashkent using systematic random sampling. The selected sample consisted of 4,385 households.

All selected households that were occupied were eligible for the Household Questionnaire. In all regions, all women age 15-49 in the selected households were eligible for the Women's Questionnaire. Eligibility for the Men's Questionnaire differed between Tashkent City and the other four regions. In Tashkent City, all men age 15-59 in the selected households were eligible respondents, while in the four remaining regions only men age 15-59 in every third household were eligible respondents. The rationale for a larger sample of men from Tashkent City was to ensure a sufficient number of observations to per- mit gender comparisons of the biodata collected only in Tashkent City.

Note: Appendix A of the final report provides more information on the sample design.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

The UHES employed three survey instruments: a Household Questionnaire, a Women’s Questionnaire, and a Men’s Questionnaire. The survey instruments were based on the model questionnaires developed by the MEASURE DHS+ project augmented by modules on topics related to adult health. The data collection instruments were reviewed and approved by an Advisory Committee of subject matter experts appointed by the Minister of Health during the summer of 2001.

Cleaning operations

Data processing took place at the Analytical and Information Center of the Ministry of Health. The office editing staff checked to confirm that questionnaires for all selected households and all eligible respondents were returned from the field. The few questions that had not been precoded (e.g., occupation) were coded at this time. The data were then entered and edited on computers using the ISSA(Integrated System for Survey Analysis) package, with the data entry software translated into Russian. Office editing and data entry activities were conducted between September 2002 and February 2003.

Response rate

A total of 4,385 households were selected, of which 4,207 were occupied households. Household interviews were completed for 4,168 households, for a household response rate of 99.1 percent of the occupied households. A total of 5,588 eligible women were found in the occupied households, and interviews were completed for 5,463 women, for an eligible woman response rate of 97.8 percent. The overall response rate for women (the product of the household and eligible woman response rates) was 96.9 percent.

For the men’s sample, a total of 2,094 households were selected, of which 2,007 were occupied households. Household interviews were completed for 1,982 households, for a household response rate of 98.8 percent of the occupied households. A total of 2,447 eligible men were found in the occupied households, and interviews were completed for 2,333 men, for an eligible man response rate of 95.3 percent. The overall response rate for men (the product of the household and eligible man response rates) was 94.2 percent.

The overall response rates were high for both women and men, although somewhat higher for women (96.9) than for men (94.2 percent). For both women and men, the overall rates did not differ greatly between urban and rural areas or among the regions, with the single exception that the rates were somewhat lower for the East-Central region (93.0 percent for women and 88.1 percent for men).

Sampling error estimates

The estimates from a sample survey are affected by two types of errors: 1) nonsampling errors, and 2) sampling errors. Nonsampling errors are the results of mistakes made in implementing data collection and data processing, such as failure to locate and interview the correct household, misunderstanding of the questions by either the interviewer or the respondent, and data entry errors. Although numerous efforts were made during the implementation of the 2002 Uzbekistan Health Examination Survey (UHES) to minimize this type of error, nonsampling errors are impossible to avoid and difficult to evaluate statistically.

Sampling errors, on the other hand, can be evaluated statistically. The sample of respondents selected in the 2002 UHES is only one of many samples that could have been selected from the same population, using the same design and expected size. Each of these samples would yield results that differ somewhat from the results of the actual sample selected. Sampling errors are a measure of the variability between all possible samples. Although the degree of variability is not known exactly, it can be estimated from the survey results.

A sampling error is usually measured in terms of the standard error for a particular statistic (e.g., mean, percentage), which is the square root of the variance. The standard error can be used to calculate confidence intervals within which the true value for the population can reasonably be assumed to fall. For example, for any given statistic calculated from a sample survey, the value of that statistic will fall within a range of plus or minus two times the standard error of that statistic in 95 percent of all possible samples of identical size and design.

If the sample of respondents had been selected as a simple random sample, it would have been possible to use straightforward formulas for calculating sampling errors. However, the 2002 UHES sample is the result of a multistage stratified design and, consequently, it was necessary to use more complex formulas. The computer software used to calculate sampling errors for the 2002 UHES is the Integrated System for Survey Analysis (ISSA) Sampling Error Module. This module used the Taylor linearization method of variance estimation for survey estimates that are means or proportions. The Jackknife repeated replication method is used for variance estimation of more complex statistics such as fertility and mortality rates.

A more detailed description of estimates of sampling errors are presented in Appendix B of the survey report.

Data appraisal

Data Quality Tables - Household age distribution - Age distribution of eligible and interviewed women - Completeness of reporting - Births by calendar years - Reporting of age at death in days - Reporting of age at death in months

Note: See details of the data quality tables in Appendix C of the report.

Abstract

The 2000 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) is one of the first full-fledged household surveys at the national level in Uzbekistan dedicated to the analysis of the situation of women and children. The goals of the survey were to gather information to monitor the progress towards the goals that were set at the World Summit for Children (1990), and to provide a basis for further national actions to ensure the survival, protection and development of children.This survey introduced several elements new to Uzbekistan including: a new model of sampling; household-based sociological interviews; analysis by age and level of education. It provided information on breastfeeding, water and sanitation, education, HIV/AIDS awareness and other subjects.

Geographic coverage

The 2000 Uzbekistan Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) is a nationally representative survey of households, women, and children.

Analysis unit

Households, Women, Child

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The sample for the Uzbekistan MICS was designed to provide estimates of health indicators at the national level, and for urban and rural areas. Five administrative regions were chosen. The sample was proportional to population, so the following distribution was made:

Region Oblasts Percent

Region 1 Fergana, Andijan, and Namangan 27.7 Region 2 Samarkand, Jizak Kashkadraya and Surkaydarya 30.8 Region 3 Tashkent Oblast, Sirdarya and Tashkent City 21.0 Region 4 Bukhara and Navoi 9.0 Region 5 Khorezm and Karakalpakstan 11.5

In the first stage census enumeration areas were chosen from a national listing of population distribution by cities, rayons, collective farms and rural areas, which were selected with probability proportional to size were selected with probability proportional to size. The standard segment size was 500, the total number of standard segments was 48463. The sampling interval was 212, and 228 primary sampling units or clusters of 24 households each were selected. Within the selected enumeration areas, a household listing was carried out, and a systematic sample of 5478 households were chosen, in 228 clusters of 24 households each. The sample was selfweighting.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

In the MICS, three modules were used: 1. Household Questionnaire 2. Individual Questionnaire for Women 3. Questionnaire for Children Under Five

The questionnaires for the Uzbekistan MICS were based on the MICS Model Questionnaire with some modifications and additions. A household questionnaire was administered in each household, which collected various information on household members. For children, the questionnaire was administered to the mother or caretaker of the child. The questionnaires were translated into two languages: Russian and Uzbek.

Response rate

Of the 5478 households selected for the Uzbekistan MICS sample, 5313 were successfully interviewed for a household response rate of 97 percent. Thus the household response rate was 100%. (Table 1). This perfect response rate is explained by the fact that for each cluster 28 households were selected, with the first 24 being approached. If any of the first 24 households were not available, a replacement household was taken from the last four of the 28 selected. In rural areas, where local khokimiyats keep excellent household listings, replacement was not practiced. In urban areas, replacement was still infrequent, but occasionally necessary. In the interviewed households, 7859 eligible women aged 15-49 were identified. In addition, 3349 children under age five were listed in the household questionnaire. The total response rate for women was 99.1% and for children 100%. The main reason of non-response for women was absence during the interview. The percentage of response rate in rural areas was higher – 99.4% than in the city – 98.4%.

Uzbekistan Population: Rural: Tashkent data was reported at 1,449.700 Person th in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 1,448.200 Person th for 2016. Uzbekistan Population: Rural: Tashkent data is updated yearly, averaging 1,429.200 Person th from Dec 1999 (Median) to 2017, with 19 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1,531.600 Person th in 2007 and a record low of 1,274.300 Person th in 2008. Uzbekistan Population: Rural: Tashkent data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.G002: Population: by Region.

Abstract

Since 2018, the Listening to the Citizens of Uzbekistan Survey (L2CU) has been implemented by the World Bank with the support of the UK Government. Around 1,500 households across the country regularly participate in the phone survey that is carried out every month. The L2CU collects information on public’s perception of overall socio-economic conditions and policy reforms, migration, employment, access to public service, household income, savings, food security, and coping mechanisms. That helps to inform the Government’s crucial decision-making for delivering essential social and economic reforms, implementing poverty reduction initiatives, and improving the well-being of citizens.

Geographic coverage

National, urban and rural

Analysis unit

• Households
• Individuals

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The sample of the L2CU is a subsample of the 2018 baseline survey. The 2018 baseline survey was conducted face-to-face interviews with a nationally and urban/rural representative sample of 4,000 households from 200 PSU (mahallas – lowest administrative unit) in Uzbekistan. The baseline survey took the two-stage sampling approach, and the sample was stratified for all 14 regions, taking into consideration settlement type (urban and rural) within each region, except for Tashkent city which fully refers to urban area. As a result, 27 strata were formed where 1 stratum was dedicated to Tashkent city and 26 strata to 13 regions. In the first stage, 200 PSU were selected with probability proportion to the population size of 27 strata and in the second stage, 20 households are randomly selected in each PSU. In the baseline, households were asked to provide phone number of their most knowledgeable member for future contact during short phone interviews (CATI - Computer Assisted Telephone Interview).

After completion of the 2018 baseline survey, L2CU monthly interviewers began regularly calling a randomly selected panel of 1,500 households over the phone to conduct short interviews, following a set monthly schedule agreed to by the participating household. For the phone L2CU survey, 7-8 households are randomly selected in each of 200 clusters in the Baseline.

To ensure that non-response in the first round (and attrition in subsequent rounds) did not affect the required sample size for survey representativeness, households that refused to participate were replaced with other households drawn from the same PSU in the baseline data.

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Telephone Interview [cati]

Research instrument

The questionnaire was administered in local languages (i.e. Uzbek and Russian) with about varying length (about 20 minutes).

Cleaning operations

At the end of data collection, the raw dataset was cleaned by the NBT with the support of the WB team. This included formatting, and correcting results based on monitoring issues, enumerator feedback and survey changes.

Uzbekistan Economically Active Population: Tashkent data was reported at 1,360.900 Person th in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 1,342.400 Person th for 2016. Uzbekistan Economically Active Population: Tashkent data is updated yearly, averaging 1,160.650 Person th from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1,360.900 Person th in 2017 and a record low of 896.500 Person th in 2000. Uzbekistan Economically Active Population: Tashkent data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.G005: Economically Active Population: by Region.

Uzbekistan Unemployment: Tashkent City data was reported at 55.400 Person th in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 43.900 Person th for 2016. Uzbekistan Unemployment: Tashkent City data is updated yearly, averaging 38.900 Person th from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 55.400 Person th in 2017 and a record low of 2.000 Person th in 2006. Uzbekistan Unemployment: Tashkent City data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.G009: Unemployment: by Region.

Uzbekistan Unemployment: Tashkent data was reported at 71.300 Person th in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 54.800 Person th for 2016. Uzbekistan Unemployment: Tashkent data is updated yearly, averaging 45.150 Person th from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 71.300 Person th in 2017 and a record low of 0.700 Person th in 2003. Uzbekistan Unemployment: Tashkent data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.G009: Unemployment: by Region.

Uzbekistan Employment Rate: Tashkent City data was reported at 80.800 % in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 81.000 % for 2016. Uzbekistan Employment Rate: Tashkent City data is updated yearly, averaging 81.050 % from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 84.100 % in 2005 and a record low of 78.700 % in 2000. Uzbekistan Employment Rate: Tashkent City data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.G008: Employment Rate: by Region.

Uzbekistan Unemployment Rate: Tashkent City data was reported at 4.500 % in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.600 % for 2016. Uzbekistan Unemployment Rate: Tashkent City data is updated yearly, averaging 3.300 % from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.500 % in 2017 and a record low of 0.200 % in 2006. Uzbekistan Unemployment Rate: Tashkent City data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.G010: Unemployment Rate: by Region.

Uzbekistan Unemployment Rate: Tashkent data was reported at 5.200 % in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 4.100 % for 2016. Uzbekistan Unemployment Rate: Tashkent data is updated yearly, averaging 3.700 % from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 5.200 % in 2017 and a record low of 0.100 % in 2006. Uzbekistan Unemployment Rate: Tashkent data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.G010: Unemployment Rate: by Region.

Uzbekistan Employment: Tashkent City data was reported at 1,171.400 Person th in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 1,169.700 Person th for 2016. Uzbekistan Employment: Tashkent City data is updated yearly, averaging 1,143.650 Person th from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1,171.400 Person th in 2017 and a record low of 1,005.200 Person th in 2000. Uzbekistan Employment: Tashkent City data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.G007: Employment: by Region.

Uzbekistan Average Monthly Nominal Wage: Year to Date: Tashkent city data was reported at 2,363.900 UZS th in Sep 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 2,252.100 UZS th for Jun 2018. Uzbekistan Average Monthly Nominal Wage: Year to Date: Tashkent city data is updated quarterly, averaging 1,928.000 UZS th from Dec 2016 (Median) to Sep 2018, with 8 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2,363.900 UZS th in Sep 2018 and a record low of 1,693.100 UZS th in Mar 2017. Uzbekistan Average Monthly Nominal Wage: Year to Date: Tashkent city data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.G012: Average Monthly Nominal Wage: by Region: Year to Date.

Uzbekistan Employment Rate: Tashkent data was reported at 75.200 % in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 75.400 % for 2016. Uzbekistan Employment Rate: Tashkent data is updated yearly, averaging 71.050 % from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 75.400 % in 2016 and a record low of 68.700 % in 2003. Uzbekistan Employment Rate: Tashkent data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.G008: Employment Rate: by Region.

Uzbekistan Average Monthly Nominal Wage: Year to Date: Tashkent data was reported at 1,886.200 UZS th in Sep 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 1,768.500 UZS th for Jun 2018. Uzbekistan Average Monthly Nominal Wage: Year to Date: Tashkent data is updated quarterly, averaging 1,510.000 UZS th from Dec 2016 (Median) to Sep 2018, with 8 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1,886.200 UZS th in Sep 2018 and a record low of 1,361.300 UZS th in Mar 2017. Uzbekistan Average Monthly Nominal Wage: Year to Date: Tashkent data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.G012: Average Monthly Nominal Wage: by Region: Year to Date.

Uzbekistan GDP: Tashkent City data was reported at 39,278.700 UZS bn in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 33,087.800 UZS bn for 2016. Uzbekistan GDP: Tashkent City data is updated yearly, averaging 19,533.300 UZS bn from Dec 2010 (Median) to 2017, with 8 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 39,278.700 UZS bn in 2017 and a record low of 8,568.600 UZS bn in 2010. Uzbekistan GDP: Tashkent City data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.A015: SNA 2008: GDP: by Region.

乌兹别克斯坦 Economically Active Population: Tashkent City在2017达1,226.800 Person th，相较于2016的1,213.600 Person th有所增长。乌兹别克斯坦 Economically Active Population: Tashkent City数据按每年更新，2000至2017期间平均值为1,183.250 Person th，共18份观测结果。该数据的历史最高值出现于2017，达1,226.800 Person th，而历史最低值则出现于2000，为1,007.900 Person th。CEIC提供的乌兹别克斯坦 Economically Active Population: Tashkent City数据处于定期更新的状态，数据来源于State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics，数据归类于Global Database的乌兹别克斯坦 – Table UZ.G005: Economically Active Population: by Region。