This dataset was created to monitor the status, condition and trend of national BLM resources in accordance with BLM policies. It focuses on the BLM terrestrial core indicators, which include measures of vegetation and soil condition such as plant species cover and composition, plant height, and soil stability. The BLM terrestrial core indicators and methods were identified through a multi-disciplinary process and are described in BLM Technical Note 440 (https://ia800701.us.archive.org/6/items/blmcoreterrestri00mack/BlmCoreTerrestrialIndicatorsAndMethods_88072539.pdf). The Landscape Monitoring Framework (LMF) dataset was collect using the Natural Resource Conservation Services (NRCS) National Resource Inventory (NRI) methodology which mirrors the data collected by the BLM using the Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland, and Savannah Ecosystems (2nd edition; https://www.landscapetoolbox.org/methods-manuals/monitoring-manual-2nd-edition/). Specific instructions for data collectors each year the data were collected can be found at https://grazingland.cssm.iastate.edu/. Also see Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health (version 5; https://www.landscapetoolbox.org/manuals/iirhv5/).The monitoring locations were selected using spatially balanced, random sampling approaches and thus provide an unbiased representation of land conditions. However, these data should not be used for statistical or spatial inferences without knowledge of how the sample design was drawn or without calculating spatial weights for the points based on the sample design.General DefinitionsNoxious: Noxious status and growth form (forb, shrub, etc.) are designated for each BLM Administrative State using the state noxious list and local botany expertise often after consulting the USDA plants database. Each state’s noxious list can be found in tblStateSpecies Table, where the Noxious field is ‘YES’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’).Non-Noxious: Non-Noxious status and growth form (forb, shrub, etc.) are designated for each BLM Administrative State using the state noxious list and local botany expertise often after consulting the USDA plants database. Non-Noxious status can be found in tblStateSpecies Table, where the Noxious field is ‘NO’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’).Sagebrush: Sagebrush species are designated for each BLM Administrative State using local botany expertise. This list can be found for each state in in the tblStateSpecies Table, where SG_Group field is ‘Sagebrush’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’).Non-Sagebrush Shrub: Non Sagebrush Shrub species are designated for each BLM Administrative State as the plants determined to be shrubs that are not also Sagebrush. This list can be found for each state in in the tblStateSpecies Table, where SG_Group field is ‘NonSagebrushShrub’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’).Tall Stature Perennial Grass: Tall Stature Perennial Grasses status was determined by Sage Grouse biologist and modified slightly in each state and this list can be found in tblStateSpecies in the SG_Group field where SG_Group field is ‘TallStaturePerennialGrass’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’).Short Stature Perennial Grass: Short Stature Perennial Grasses status was determined by Sage Grouse biologist and modified slightly in each state and this list can be found in tblStateSpecies in the SG_Group field where SG_Group field is ‘ShortStaturePerennialGrass’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’).Preferred Forb: Preferred forb for Sage Grouse status was determined for each state by Sage Grouse biologist and other local experts and this list can be found in tblStateSpecies in the SG_Group field where SG_Group field is ‘PreferredForb’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’).Live: The NRI Methods measure Live vs Dead plant cover – i.e. if a pin drop hits a plant part and that plant part is dead (even if it’s on a living plant) that hit is considered a dead hit. Any occurrence of Live Sagebrush calculations indicates that the measurement is only hits that were live plant parts. If a pin hits both a live and a dead plant part in the same pin drop – that hit is considered live.Growth Habit: The form of a plant, in this dataset the options are Forb, Graminoid, Sedge, Succulent, Shrub, SubShrub, Tree, NonVascular. The most common growth habit for each state was determined by local botany expertise often after consulting the USDA plants database. The growth habit for each species is a state can be found in tblStateSpecies in the GrowthHabitSub field. The values are used to place each plant in a Growth Habit/Duration bin such as Perennial Grass, or Annual Forb, etc.Duration: The life length of a plant. In this dataset we consider plants to be either Perennial or Annual – Biennial plants are classified as Annuals. The most common duration for each state was determined by local botany expertise often after consulting the USDA plants database. The duration for each species is a state can be found in tblStateSpecies in the Duration field. The values are used to place each plant in a Growth Habit/Duration bin such as Perennial Grass, or Annual Forb, etc.tblStateSpecies: This table in the database contains the Species Lists for each state. In the instance where a species code does not have a Growth Habit, Growth Habit Sub, or Duration – any occurrence of that code will not be included in calculations that require that information – for example a code that has NonWoody Forb but no information about annual or perennial will not be included in any of the calculations that are perennial or annual forb calculations. Most codes with no information will have the following in the notes – indicating that the only calculation it will be included in is Total Foliar which doesn’t require any growth habit and duration information – “Not used for calculations except Total Foliar.”

This feature class includes monitoring data collected nationally to understand the status, condition, and trend of resources on BLM lands. It focuses on the BLM terrestrial core indicators, which include measures of vegetation and soil condition such as plant species cover and composition, plant height, and soil stability. The BLM terrestrial core indicators and methods were identified through a multi-disciplinary process and are described in BLM Technical Note 440 (https://ia800701.us.archive.org/6/items/blmcoreterrestri00mack/BlmCoreTerrestrialIndicatorsAndMethods_88072539.pdf). The Landscape Monitoring Framework (LMF) dataset was collect using the Natural Resource Conservation Services (NRCS) National Resource Inventory (NRI) methodology which mirrors the data collected by the BLM using the Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland, and Savannah Ecosystems (2nd edition; https://www.landscapetoolbox.org/manuals/monitoring-manual/). Specific instructions for data collectors each year the data were collected can be found at https://grazingland.cssm.iastate.edu/reference-materials. Also see Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health (version 5; https://www.landscapetoolbox.org/manuals/iirhv5/). The monitoring locations were selected using spatially balanced, random sampling approaches and thus provide an unbiased representation of land conditions. However, these data should not be used for statistical or spatial inferences without knowledge of how the sample design was drawn or without calculating spatial weights for the points based on the sample design. General Definitions Noxious: Noxious status and growth form (forb, shrub, etc.) are designated for each BLM Administrative State using the state noxious list and local botany expertise often after consulting the USDA plants database. Each state’s noxious list can be found in tblStateSpecies Table, where the Noxious field is ‘YES’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’). Non-Noxious: Non-Noxious status and growth form (forb, shrub, etc.) are designated for each BLM Administrative State using the state noxious list and local botany expertise often after consulting the USDA plants database. Non-Noxious status can be found in tblStateSpecies Table, where the Noxious field is ‘NO’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’). Sagebrush: Sagebrush species are designated for each BLM Administrative State using local botany expertise. This list can be found for each state in in the tblStateSpecies Table, where SG_Group field is ‘Sagebrush’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’). Non-Sagebrush Shrub: Non Sagebrush Shrub species are designated for each BLM Administrative State as the plants determined to be shrubs that are not also Sagebrush. This list can be found for each state in in the tblStateSpecies Table, where SG_Group field is ‘NonSagebrushShrub’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’). Tall Stature Perennial Grass: Tall Stature Perennial Grasses status was determined by Sage Grouse biologist and modified slightly in each state and this list can be found in tblStateSpecies in the SG_Group field where SG_Group field is ‘TallStaturePerennialGrass’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’). Short Stature Perennial Grass: Short Stature Perennial Grasses status was determined by Sage Grouse biologist and modified slightly in each state and this list can be found in tblStateSpecies in the SG_Group field where SG_Group field is ‘ShortStaturePerennialGrass’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’). Preferred Forb: Preferred forb for Sage Grouse status was determined for each state by Sage Grouse biologist and other local experts and this list can be found in tblStateSpecies in the SG_Group field where SG_Group field is ‘PreferredForb’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’). Live: The NRI Methods measure Live vs Dead plant cover – i.e. if a pin drop hits a plant part and that plant part is dead (even if it’s on a living plant) that hit is considered a dead hit. Any occurrence of Live Sagebrush calculations indicates that the measurement is only hits that were live plant parts. If a pin hits both a live and a dead plant part in the same pin drop – that hit is considered live. Growth Habit: The form of a plant, in this dataset the options are Forb, Graminoid, Sedge, Succulent, Shrub, SubShrub, Tree, NonVascular. The most common growth habit for each state was determined by local botany expertise often after consulting the USDA plants database. The growth habit for each species is a state can be found in tblStateSpecies in the GrowthHabitSub field. The values are used to place each plant in a Growth Habit/Duration bin such as Perennial Grass, or Annual Forb, etc. Duration: The life length of a plant. In this dataset we consider plants to be either Perennial or Annual – Biennial plants are classified as Annuals. The most common duration for each state was determined by local botany expertise often after consulting the USDA plants database. The duration for each species is a state can be found in tblStateSpecies in the Duration field. The values are used to place each plant in a Growth Habit/Duration bin such as Perennial Grass, or Annual Forb, etc. tblStateSpecies: This table in the database contains the Species Lists for each state. In the instance where a species code does not have a Growth Habit, Growth Habit Sub, or Duration – any occurrence of that code will not be included in calculations that require that information – for example a code that has NonWoody Forb but no information about annual or perennial will not be included in any of the calculations that are perennial or annual forb calculations. Most codes with no information will have the following in the notes – indicating that the only calculation it will be included in is Total Foliar which doesn’t require any growth habit and duration information – “Not used for calculations except Total Foliar.”

Since 2011, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has collected field information to inform land health through its Assessment Inventory and Monitoring (AIM) strategy. To date, more than 6,000 terrestrial AIM field plots have been collected over BLM lands. The BLM AIM data archive is updated annually. Standardized core indicators are collected at each plot that are known to be both ecologically relevant and clearly tied to rangeland health. These indicators inform biotic integrity, soil and site stability, and hydrologic function. The terrestrial plot measurements include fractional bare ground cover, vegetation composition and height, plants of management concern, non-native invasive species, plant canopy gaps, species richness, and soil aggregate stability. AIM represents one of the most extensive publicly available plot measurement datasets across Western US federal lands, which can be integrated with remotely sensed imagery and other geospatial information for a range of analysis, classification, and validation purposes. This dataset was created to monitor the status, condition and trend of national BLM resources in accordance with BLM policies. The methodology used for the collection of these data can be found on the Landscape Toolbox and the Monitoring Manual, 2nd Edition. These data should not be used for statistical or spatial inferences without knowledge of how the sample design was drawn or without calculating spatial weights for the points based on the sample design. This feature class includes monitoring data collected nationally to understand the status, condition, and trend of resources on BLM lands. Data are collected in accordance with the BLM Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM) Strategy. The AIM Strategy specifies a probabilistic sampling design, standard core indicators and methods, electronic data capture and management, and integration with remote sensing. Attributes include the BLM terrestrial core indicators: bare ground, vegetation composition, plant species of management concern, non-native invasive species, and percent canopy gaps (see Entity/Attribute Section for exact details on attributes). Data were collected and managed by BLM Field Offices, BLM Districts, and/or affiliated field crews with support from the BLM National Operations Center. Data are stored in a centralized database (TerrADat) at the BLM National Operations Center. Data were collected by trained data collectors with the BLM and partner organizations. They followed the BLM core terrestrial data collection protocols. Data were captured electronically using the Database for Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessment. They were managed by the data collectors, with oversight from BLM field offices, state offices, and the National Operations Center. This dataset has undergone rigorous QA/QC to ensure data quality.

This feature class includes monitoring data collected nationally to understand the status, condition, and trend of resources on BLM lands. Data are collected in accordance with the BLM Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM) Strategy. The AIM Strategy specifies a probabilistic sampling design, standard core indicators and methods, electronic data capture and management, and integration with remote sensing. Attributes include the BLM terrestrial core indicators: bare ground, vegetation composition, plant species of management concern, non-native invasive species, and percent canopy gaps (see EntityAttribute Section for exact details on attributes). Data were collected and managed by BLM Field Offices, BLM Districts, andor affiliated field crews with support from the BLM National Operations Center. Data are stored in a centralized database (TerrADat) at the BLM National Operations Center.The Terrestrial AIM data (TerrADat) dataset was collected by the BLM using the Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland, and Savannah Ecosystems (2nd edition; http:www.landscapetoolbox.orgmanualsmonitoring-manual). Also see Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health (version 4; http:www.landscapetoolbox.orgwp-contentuploads201501IIRHv4.pdf). The vast majority of monitoring locations were selected using spatially balanced, random sampling approaches and thus provide an unbiased representation of land conditions. However, these data should not be used for statistical or spatial inferences without knowledge of how the sample design was drawn or without calculating spatial weights for the points based on the sample design. General Definitions - Noxious: Noxious status and growth form (forb, shrub, etc.) are designated for each BLM Administrative State using the state noxious list and local botany expertise often after consulting the USDA plants database. Each state’s noxious list can be found in tblStateSpecies Table, where the Noxious field is ‘YES’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’). Non-Noxious: Non-Noxious status and growth form (forb, shrub, etc.) are designated for each BLM Administrative State using the state noxious list and local botany expertise often after consulting the USDA plants database. Non-Noxious status can be found in tblStateSpecies Table, where the Noxious field is ‘NO’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’). Sagebrush: Sagebrush species are designated for each BLM Administrative State using local botany expertise. This list can be found for each state in in the tblStateSpecies Table, where SG_Group field is ‘Sagebrush’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’). Non-Sagebrush Shrub: Non Sagebrush Shrub species are designated for each BLM Administrative State as the plants determined to be shrubs that are not also Sagebrush. This list can be found for each state in in the tblStateSpecies Table, where SG_Group field is ‘NonSagebrushShrub’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’). Tall Stature Perennial Grass: Tall Stature Perennial Grasses status was determined by Sage Grouse biologist and modified slightly in each state and this list can be found in tblStateSpecies in the SG_Group field where SG_Group field is ‘TallStaturePerennialGrass’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’). Short Stature Perennial Grass: Short Stature Perennial Grasses status was determined by Sage Grouse biologist and modified slightly in each state and this list can be found in tblStateSpecies in the SG_Group field where SG_Group field is ‘ShortStaturePerennialGrass’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’). Preferred Forb: Preferred forb for Sage Grouse status was determined for each state by Sage Grouse biologist and other local experts and this list can be found in tblStateSpecies in the SG_Group field where SG_Group field is ‘PreferredForb’ and the StateSpecies field has the two letter state code for the desired state (e.g. ‘NM’). Live: The Core Methods measure Live vs Standing Dead plant cover – i.e. if a pin drop hits a plant part and that plant part is dead (even if it’s on a living plant) that hit is considered a dead hit. Any occurrence of Live Sagebrush calculations indicates that the measurement is only hits that were live plant parts. If a pin hits both a live and a standing dead plant part in the same pin drop – that hit is considered live.

Teradata reported $89M in EBITDA for its fiscal quarter ending in March of 2025. Data for Teradata | TDC - Ebitda including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

The U.S. firm Teradata generated over 1.8 billion U.S. dollars in revenue in 2023. The vast majority of this was attributed to recurring revenue, while around 16 percent was attributed to consulting services.

Teradata reported $418M in Sales Revenues for its fiscal quarter ending in March of 2025. Data for Teradata | TDC - Sales Revenues including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

The statistic depicts the annual revenue generated by Teradata Corporation, by region, from 2010 to 2022. In 2022, Teradata brought in 1 billion U.S. dollars in revenue from sales in the Americas.

Teradata reports a 10.5% revenue decline in Q4 CY2024, missing Wall Street expectations. The company faces ongoing market challenges and a cautious future outlook.

Teradata gross margin from 2010 to 2025. Gross margin can be defined as a company's total sales revenue minus its cost of goods sold, divided by the total sales revenue, expressed as a percentage.

In 2021, U.S.-based firm Teradata reported annual revenue of 1.9 billion dollars. This represents a return to the 2019 figure after having fallen to 1.8 billion U.S. dollars in 2020. Teradata is an enterprise software company that provides database and analytics-related software, services, and products.

Teradata current ratio from 2010 to 2025. Current ratio can be defined as a liquidity ratio that measures a company's ability to pay short-term obligations.

Teradata shares outstanding from 2010 to 2025. Shares outstanding can be defined as the number of shares held by shareholders (including insiders) assuming conversion of all convertible debt, securities, warrants and options. This metric excludes the company's treasury shares.

Teradata operating expenses from 2010 to 2025. Operating expenses can be defined as the sum of all operating expenses for the given industry.

Teradata reported $170M in Cost of Sales for its fiscal quarter ending in March of 2025. Data for Teradata | TDC - Cost Of Sales including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

Teradata basic eps from 2010 to 2025. Basic eps can be defined as a company's net earnings or losses attributable to common shareholders per basic share basis.

Teradata Corporation Company Profile, Opportunities, Challenges and Risk (SWOT, PESTLE and Value Chain); Corporate and ESG Strategies; Competitive Intelligence; Financial KPI’s; Operational KPI’s; Recent Trends: “ Read More

The PERM Sponsorship Trends linear chart visualizes the number of PERM cases filed by Teradata Operations from 2020 to 2023, highlighting the company’s long-term sponsorship patterns. The horizontal bar chart titled Distribution of Job Fields Receiving PERM Sponsorship further categorizes sponsored roles by job type.

Teradata reported $44M in Net Income for its fiscal quarter ending in March of 2025. Data for Teradata | TDC - Net Income including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

Credit report of Teradata Chile Ltda contains unique and detailed export import market intelligence with it's phone, email, Linkedin and details of each import and export shipment like product, quantity, price, buyer, supplier names, country and date of shipment.