100+ datasets found
  1. U

    Aircraft-Borne Thermal Imagery and Derived Terrain Analysis Layers, Pisgah...

    • data.usgs.gov
    • gimi9.com
    • +3more
    Updated Jul 18, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jeff Jenness; J.J. Wynne; Murzy Jhabvala; Nathalie Cabrol (2024). Aircraft-Borne Thermal Imagery and Derived Terrain Analysis Layers, Pisgah Lava Field, California [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5066/P9NF0L2I
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 18, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    Jeff Jenness; J.J. Wynne; Murzy Jhabvala; Nathalie Cabrol
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Apr 11, 2011 - Apr 13, 2011
    Area covered
    California
    Description

    This dataset is one of many used in the development of the manuscript 'Advancing Cave Detection using Terrain Analysis Techniques and Thermal Imagery' by Wynne et al. 2021. Manuscript Abstract: Since the initial experiments nearly 50 years ago, techniques for detecting caves using airborne and spacecraft acquired thermal imagery have improved markedly. These advances are largely due to a combination of higher instrument sensitivity, modern computing systems, and processor-intensive analytical techniques. Through applying these advancements, our goals were to: (1) determine the utility of methods designed for terrain analysis and applied to thermal imagery; (2) analyze the usefulness of predawn and midday imagery for detecting caves; and, (3) determine which imagery type (predawn, midday, or the difference between the two) was most useful. Using forward stepwise logistic (FSL) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis for model selection, and ...

  2. H

    Data from: Hydrologic Terrain Analysis Using Web Based Tools

    • hydroshare.org
    • beta.hydroshare.org
    • +1more
    zip
    Updated Apr 11, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    David Tarboton; Nazmus Sazib; Anthony Michael Castronova; Yan Liu; Xing Zheng; David Maidment; Anthony Keith Aufdenkampe; Shaowen Wang (2018). Hydrologic Terrain Analysis Using Web Based Tools [Dataset]. https://www.hydroshare.org/resource/e1d4f2aff7d84f79b901595f6ea48368
    Explore at:
    zip(49.8 MB)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 11, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    HydroShare
    Authors
    David Tarboton; Nazmus Sazib; Anthony Michael Castronova; Yan Liu; Xing Zheng; David Maidment; Anthony Keith Aufdenkampe; Shaowen Wang
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Digital Elevation Models (DEM) are widely used to derive information for the modeling of hydrologic processes. The basic model for hydrologic terrain analysis involving hydrologic conditioning, determination of flow field (flow directions) and derivation of hydrologic derivatives is available in multiple software packages and GIS systems. However as areas of interest for terrain analysis have increased and DEM resolutions become finer there remain challenges related to data size, software and a platform to run it on, as well as opportunities to derive new kinds of information useful for hydrologic modeling. This presentation will illustrate new functionality associated with the TauDEM software (http://hydrology.usu.edu/taudem) and new web based deployments of TauDEM to make this capability more accessible and easier to use. Height Above Nearest Drainage (HAND) is a special case of distance down the flow field to an arbitrary target, with the target being a stream and distance measured vertically. HAND is one example of a general class of hydrologic proximity measures available in TauDEM. As we have implemented it, HAND uses multi-directional flow directions derived from a digital elevation model (DEM) using the Dinifinity method in TauDEM to determine the height of each grid cell above the nearest stream along the flow path from that cell to the stream. With this information, and the depth of flow in the stream, the potential for, and depth of flood inundation can be determined. Furthermore, by dividing streams into reaches or segments, the area draining to each reach can be isolated and a series of threshold depths applied to the grid of HAND values in that isolated reach catchment, to determine inundation volume, surface area and wetted bed area. Dividing these by length yields reach average cross section area, width, and wetted perimeter, information that is useful for hydraulic routing and stage-discharge rating calculations in hydrologic modeling. This presentation will describe the calculation of HAND and its use to determine hydraulic properties across the US for prediction of stage and flood inundation in each NHDPlus reach modeled by the US NOAA’s National Water Model. This presentation will also describe two web based deployments of TauDEM functionality. The first is within a Jupyter Notebook web application attached to HydroShare that provides users the ability to execute TauDEM on this cloud infrastructure without the limitations associated with desktop software installation and data/computational capacity. The second is a web based rapid watershed delineation function deployed as part of Model My Watershed (https://app.wikiwatershed.org/) that enables delineation of watersheds, based on NHDPlus gridded data anywhere in the continental US for watershed based hydrologic modeling and analysis.

    Presentation for European Geophysical Union Meeting, April 2018, Vienna. Tarboton, D. G., N. Sazib, A. Castronova, Y. Liu, X. Zheng, D. Maidment, A. Aufdenkampe and S. Wang, (2018), "Hydrologic Terrain Analysis Using Web Based Tools," European Geophysical Union General Assembly, Vienna, April 12, Geophysical Research Abstracts 20, EGU2018-10337, https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2018/EGU2018-10337.pdf.

  3. d

    Terrain Analysis for Landlab using Taudem

    • dataone.org
    Updated Apr 15, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Christina Bandaragoda (2022). Terrain Analysis for Landlab using Taudem [Dataset]. https://dataone.org/datasets/sha256%3A81541df9e076c9da83de8a18e11e1a09c6fba33767e88919616bcbe2aad006d4
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 15, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Hydroshare
    Authors
    Christina Bandaragoda
    Description

    Taudem is awesome!. Visit https://dataone.org/datasets/sha256%3A81541df9e076c9da83de8a18e11e1a09c6fba33767e88919616bcbe2aad006d4 for complete metadata about this dataset.

  4. U

    Positive Openness for North Carolina by HUC8

    • data.usgs.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Jul 18, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Silvia Terziotti; Kristina Hopkins (2024). Positive Openness for North Carolina by HUC8 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5066/P9PRAVAQ
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 18, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    Silvia Terziotti; Kristina Hopkins
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2004 - Jan 1, 2009
    Area covered
    North Carolina
    Description

    Rasters of positive openness for the 53 hydrologic unit code (HUC) 8 watersheds in the state of North Carolina. Positive openness uses a line-of-sight approach to measure the surrounding eight zenith angles viewed above the landscape surface out to a specified distance. The central cells gets and average of the eight angles. An angle of 90 degrees would indicate a flat surface, while angles less than 90 degrees indicate a concave surface. Positive openness was calculated with the Relief Visualization Toolbox (https://iaps.zrc-sazu.si/en/rvt#v, Kokalji et al., 2011; Zakšek et al., 2011) using light detection and ranging (lidar) derived digital elevation models (DEM) with a resolution of 10 ft. (~3m). A length scale of 60 ft.(6 pixels) was used to search surrounding terrain elevations in the eight cardinal directions.

  5. d

    Onion Terrain Analysis Start

    • dataone.org
    • hydroshare.org
    • +2more
    Updated Dec 5, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    David Tarboton (2021). Onion Terrain Analysis Start [Dataset]. https://dataone.org/datasets/sha256%3A03bacd761b2784ac8fe431e885b39e7501717ba2553e5a6203f96a67123b6566
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 5, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Hydroshare
    Authors
    David Tarboton
    Description

    A 1/3 arc second digital elevation model from the National Elevation dataset. This DEM has had a flow direction conditioning procedure applied to it to remove barriers along high resolution NHD flowlines. The outlet.shp shapefile is the location where this Onion Creek enters the Colorado River of Texas and is used to specify the point upstream of which watersheds should be delineated.

  6. f

    Sawyer Mill Dam Removal Drone DSM Elevation vs. Conventional Survey Terrain...

    • figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Feb 18, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Alexandra Evans; Kevin Gardner (2022). Sawyer Mill Dam Removal Drone DSM Elevation vs. Conventional Survey Terrain Analysis for Reservoir Response Paper (2019 & 2020) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14668176.v2
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 18, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Authors
    Alexandra Evans; Kevin Gardner
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    These are the calculations used for examining elevation differences between the drone DSMs and conventional survey elevations across terrain types in the Evans et al. Sawyer Mill dam removal reservoir response manuscript. The “Extract Values to Points” tool in ArcGIS Pro extracted the DSM raster values at the XY locations of the surveyed points. Using the surveyed elevations and extracted DSM values across the available areas and flight dates, trends in the drone DSMs’ Z-direction accuracy were examined across different terrain categories: vegetation, dry terrain (e.g. exposed ground or wood), and submerged terrain (e.g. substrate). Elevation values correspond to NAVD88 in meters. The DSMs' and surveyed points' XY were in WGS 84 when used in the “Extract Values to Points” tool. The "Terrain" columns designate the final terrain type categories used in the terrain analysis presented in the manuscript, while the "Terrain/Notes from Field" columns contain transcribed notes from survey field notebooks that were written in the field. Vegetation heights were also from survey field notebooks. Please see the manuscript and spreadsheet for additional information. These materials were made using resources from an NSF EPSCoR funded project “RII Track-2 FEC: Strengthening the scientific basis for decision-making about dams: Multi-scale, coupled-systems research on ecological, social, and economic trade-offs” (a.k.a. "Future of Dams"). Support for this project is provided by the National Science Foundation’s Research Infrastructure Improvement NSF #IIA-1539071. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

  7. Data from: Northern New Mexico post-fire refugia data

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • datasets.ai
    • +7more
    Updated Apr 26, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Forest Service (2018). Northern New Mexico post-fire refugia data [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/documents/cbb7b77da1b747c19be505725425d4be
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 26, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Servicehttp://fs.fed.us/
    Authors
    U.S. Forest Service
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This publication contains spatial data, tabular data and scripts used to analyze the spatial patterns of refugia and associated plant communities following each of several fires in northern New Mexico. Four of the geotiff files were derived during the project (*Kernel.tif) using dNBR (delta Normalized Burn Ratio) or dNDVI (delta Normalized Difference Vegetation Index). The kernel raster data represent density of unburned/low severity grid cells in approximately 10-hectare neighborhoods following the Cerro Grande, Dome, La Mesa, and Las Conchas fire events in 2000, 1996, 1977, and 2011, respectively. The data were produced using a kernel smooth process, with output values range from 0 to 1, representing a gradient in neighborhood density of refugia. In addition, geotiff files of the dNBR for Las Conchas (this version is not available at mtbs.gov, but was provided for the study by S. Howard, USGS-EROS), the dNDVI for La Mesa and the La Mesa footprint (both developed for the Fire atlas for the Gila and Aldo Leopold Wilderness Areas project; https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2015-0023) are also included. Finally, the archive contains a digital elevation model (developed by USGS-EROS), cropped to the study area; the DEM was used to derive terrain metrics describing topographic heterogeneity at local and catchment scales. The text files contain R scripts and associated tabular data that can be used to repeat the analysis presented in the publication by performing the following functions: 1) generate the kernel rasters (kernel geotiffs described, above); 2) generate terrain metrics from DEM (geotiff included), 3) sample the kernel rasters, terrain metric outputs and 1 kilometer resolution bioclimatic data (downloaded from https://adaptwest.databasin.org/pages/adaptwest-climatena); 4) develop environmental models from the raster sample data (text file included); and 5) conduct a multivariate analysis of species and communities using species data recorded in the field (text file included).

  8. Etched Terrain Analysis

    • figshare.com
    bin
    Updated Jan 17, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nicholas Warner (2022). Etched Terrain Analysis [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.18551195.v1
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 17, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Nicholas Warner
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset includes ArcGIS files for the Etched Terrain analysis from Warner et al. (2022) Stratigraphy of InSight landing site.

  9. H

    Data For Terrain Analysis Enhancements to the Height Above Nearest Drainage...

    • beta.hydroshare.org
    • hydroshare.org
    • +1more
    zip
    Updated Sep 3, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Irene Garousi-Nejad; David Tarboton; Mahyar Aboutalebi; Alfonso Faustino Torres-Rua (2019). Data For Terrain Analysis Enhancements to the Height Above Nearest Drainage Flood Inundation Mapping Method [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4211/hs.7235a0d6a18343078b2028085b7d8018
    Explore at:
    zip(4.0 GB)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 3, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    HydroShare
    Authors
    Irene Garousi-Nejad; David Tarboton; Mahyar Aboutalebi; Alfonso Faustino Torres-Rua
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This resource contains the data and scripts used for: Garousi-Nejad, I., D. G. Tarboton, M. Aboutalebi and A. F. Torres-Rua, (2019), "Terrain Analysis Enhancements to the Height Above Nearest Drainage Flood Inundation Mapping Method," Water Resources Research, http://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024837.

    Abstract from the paper: Flood inundation remains challenging to map, model, and forecast because it requires detailed representations of hydrologic and hydraulic processes. Recently, Continental‐Scale Flood Inundation Mapping (CFIM), an empirical approach with fewer data demands, has been suggested. This approach uses National Water Model forecast discharge with Height Above Nearest Drainage (HAND) calculated from a digital elevation model to approximate reach‐averaged hydraulic properties, estimate a synthetic rating curve, and map near real‐time flood inundation from stage. In 2017, rapid snowmelt resulted in a record flood on the Bear River in Utah, USA. In this study, we evaluated the CFIM method over the river section where this flooding occurred. We compared modeled flood inundation with the flood inundation observed in high‐resolution Planet RapidEye satellite imagery. Differences were attributed to discrepancies between observed and forecast discharges but also notably due to shortcomings in the derivation of HAND from National Elevation Dataset as implemented in CFIM, and possibly due to sub optimal hydraulic roughness parameter. Examining these differences highlights limitations in the HAND terrain analysis methodology. We present a set of improvements developed to overcome some limitations and advance CFIM outcomes. These include conditioning the topography using high‐resolution hydrography, dispersing nodes used to subdivide the river into reaches and catchments, and using a high‐resolution digital elevation model. We also suggest an approach to obtain a reach specific Manning's n from observed inundation and validated improvements for the flood of March 2019 in the Ocheyedan River, Iowa. The methods developed have the potential to improve CFIM.

    The file Readme.md describes the contents and steps for reproducing the analyses in the paper.

  10. d

    Data from: Classification of Mars Terrain Using Multiple Data Sources

    • catalog.data.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +1more
    Updated Apr 10, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dashlink (2025). Classification of Mars Terrain Using Multiple Data Sources [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/classification-of-mars-terrain-using-multiple-data-sources
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 10, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Dashlink
    Description

    Classification of Mars Terrain Using Multiple Data Sources Alan Kraut1, David Wettergreen1 ABSTRACT. Images of Mars are being collected faster than they can be analyzed by planetary scientists. Automatic analysis of images would enable more rapid and more consistent image interpretation and could draft geologic maps where none yet exist. In this work we develop a method for incorporating images from multiple instruments to classify Martian terrain into multiple types. Each image is segmented into contiguous groups of similar pixels, called superpixels, with an associated vector of discriminative features. We have developed and tested several classification algorithms to associate a best class to each superpixel. These classifiers are trained using three different manual classifications with between 2 and 6 classes. Automatic classification accuracies of 50 to 80% are achieved in leave-one-out cross-validation across 20 scenes using a multi-class boosting classifier.

  11. Contours Line

    • geo1.scholarsportal.info
    • geo2.scholarsportal.info
    Updated Nov 8, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    DMTI Spatial Inc. (2023). Contours Line [Dataset]. http://geo1.scholarsportal.info/proxy.html?http:_giseditor.scholarsportal.info/details/view.html?uri=/NAP/DMTI_CMCS_ContoursLine_series.xml&show_as_standalone=true
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 8, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Dmti Spatial Inc.
    Authors
    DMTI Spatial Inc.
    Time period covered
    Sep 15, 2015 - Sep 15, 2023
    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset depicts lines of constant elevation. It can be used for terrain analysis and cartography purposes.

    Additional tables and supporting documentation are available in the Data Dictionary and User Manual.

  12. Terrain - Slope Map

    • pacificgeoportal.com
    • data.catchmentbasedapproach.org
    • +3more
    Updated Dec 31, 2013
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Esri (2013). Terrain - Slope Map [Dataset]. https://www.pacificgeoportal.com/datasets/a1ba14d09df14f42ad6ca3c4bcebf3b4
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 31, 2013
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Area covered
    Description

    This map provides a colorized representation of slope, generated dynamically using server-side slope function on the Terrain layer. The degree of slope steepness is depicted by light to dark colors - flat surfaces as gray, shallow slopes as light yellow, moderate slopes as light orange and steep slopes as red-brown. A scaling is applied to slope values to generate appropriate visualization at each map scale. This service should only be used for visualization, such as a base layer in applications or maps. Note: If access to non-scaled slope values is required, use the Slope Degrees or Slope Percent functions, which return values from 0 to 90 degrees, or 0 to 1000%, respectively.Units: DegreesUpdate Frequency: QuarterlyCoverage: World/GlobalData Sources: This layer is compiled from a variety of best available sources from several data providers. To see the coverage and extents of various datasets comprising this service in an interactive map, see World Elevation Coverage Map.What can you do with this layer?Use for Visualization: Yes. This colorized slope is appropriate for visualizing the steepness of the terrain at all map scales. This layer can be added to applications or maps to enhance contextual understanding. Use for Analysis: No. 8 bit color values returned by this service represent scaled slope values. For analysis with non-scaled values, use the Slope Degrees or Slope Percent functions.For more details such as Data Sources, Mosaic method used in this layer, please see the Terrain layer. This layer allows query, identify, and export image requests. The layer is restricted to a 5,000 x 5,000 pixel limit in a single export image request.

    This layer is part of a larger collection of elevation layers that you can use to perform a variety of mapping analysis tasks.

  13. f

    Historic Elevation Map of West Virginia

    • figshare.com
    tiff
    Updated Aug 23, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Matthew Ross (2020). Historic Elevation Map of West Virginia [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12846764.v1
    Explore at:
    tiffAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 23, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Authors
    Matthew Ross
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    West Virginia
    Description

    This DEM dataset comes from Ross et al., 2016 (ES&T) and represents a pre-mining DEM for much of west-virginia. The majority of the map was generated before 1970.

  14. Soil quality and soil property data and terrain data for 3D multi-scale...

    • doi.pangaea.de
    zip
    Updated Dec 1, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tobias Rentschler; Thorsten Behrens; Thomas Scholten; Karsten Schmidt (2021). Soil quality and soil property data and terrain data for 3D multi-scale contextual spatial modelling in Lora del Rio, Andalusia, Spain [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.938774
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 1, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    PANGAEA
    Authors
    Tobias Rentschler; Thorsten Behrens; Thomas Scholten; Karsten Schmidt
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Oct 1, 2018 - Oct 11, 2018
    Area covered
    Description

    The dataset was used to estimate the relevant range of spatial scales with multi-scale contextual spatial modelling. The modelled soil properties were cation exchange capacity, pH, and water content at field capacity. The soil quality indicator data was modelled and predicted with partial least squares regression models based on NIR and MIR spectroscopy (Pangaea DOI (doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.938522): “Soil spectroscopy data from 130 soil profiles in Lora del Rio, Andalusia, Spain”). The soil samples were taken in an area of 1000 km² around Lora del Rio, Andalusia, Spain, in the Sierra Morena mountain range (Palaeozoic granite, gneiss, and slate), at the Guadalquivir river flood plain (Pleistocene marl, calcarenite, coarse sand, and Holocene sands and loams), and southern tertiary terraces (coarse gravel and cobble with sands and loams). Present soil types according to USDA Soil Taxonomy are Alfisols, Entisols, Inceptisols, and Vertisols. The basis for the multi-scale terrain analysis was a digital terrain model by the Centro Nacional de Information Geográfica (CNIG) of the Spanish government. The digital terrain model was published under the CC-BY 4.0 license via the Centro de Descargas del CNIG (IGN; doi:10.7419/162.09.2020) with the title Digital Terrain Model - DTM05 (EPSG: 25830) and last accessed on March, 31st 2020. The study area is covered by the MTN50 map sheets 0941, 0942, 0963, 0964, 0985, and 0986. The multi-scale contextual spatial modelling and the derivation of the scaled terrain covariates was based on the Gaussian pyramid (doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.09.015 and doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33516-6) and the estimation of the relevant range of scales was based on exhaustive additive and subtractive machine learning sequences (doi:10.1038/s41598-019-51395-3). The models were trained with the multi-scale terrain covariates at each soil profile location extracted from the digital terrain model derivatives. For each soil depth of the soil dataset (0-10, 10-20, 20-30, 40-60, and 70-100 cm) two model sequences (additive and subtractive) were trained.

  15. University of Arizona Planetary Photogrammetry Workshop Materials

    • zenodo.org
    zip
    Updated Nov 13, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Michael Phillips; Michael Phillips; Shane Byrne; Shane Byrne (2024). University of Arizona Planetary Photogrammetry Workshop Materials [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14144681
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 13, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Michael Phillips; Michael Phillips; Shane Byrne; Shane Byrne
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Nov 13, 2024
    Description

    Workshop Materials Directory Overview

    This directory contains a collection of workshop materials and resources for training sessions focused on planetary photogrammetric techniques. It includes step-by-step guides, exercises, installation instructions, presentations, and supplementary data files to support participants in utilizing software for photogrammetry.

    Contents:

    • Workshop Materials
      Includes resources on NASA’s Ames Stereo Pipeline (ASP), structure-from-motion (SfM) techniques, photogrammetry basics, and HiRISE DTM analysis in QGIS. Key files:

      • ASP: Installation notes, introductory slides, support files, command guide, Docker setup, and stereopipeline documentation.
      • SfM: Resources and guides on GCPs, surveying, exercise materials, and installation/setup instructions.
      • Additional Materials: Workshop agenda, QGIS HiRISE DTM analysis guide, and introduction presentations.
    • Elysium Planitia Lava Preprocessing Data
      A zip file containing preprocessing data for analyzing the Elysium Planitia region on Mars, useful for DTM and geospatial applications.

    Each sub-directory provides targeted resources designed to aid participants in learning digital elevation modeling for planetary surfaces. This structured, multi-session dataset supports both beginners and advanced users in photogrammetry, geospatial analysis, and terrain modeling applications, with a focus on Martian data.

  16. d

    Logan River Geography

    • search.dataone.org
    • hydroshare.org
    • +1more
    Updated Dec 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    David Tarboton (2023). Logan River Geography [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/sha256%3A253b4de05db771978a73fb8c4f8d2a3f12d93144e58af652b727f0df4656b029
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Hydroshare
    Authors
    David Tarboton
    Area covered
    Description

    This is a collection of results derived using hydrologic terrain analysis from the Logan River Digital elevation model.

  17. L

    Land Elements (North Island)

    • lris.scinfo.org.nz
    dwg, erdas imagine +7
    Updated Aug 4, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Landcare Research (2017). Land Elements (North Island) [Dataset]. https://lris.scinfo.org.nz/layer/48334-land-elements-north-island/download/
    Explore at:
    kml, geojpeg, pdf, jpeg2000 lossless, kea, jpeg2000, erdas imagine, geotiff, dwgAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 4, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Landcare Research
    Area covered
    Description

    Geospatial data for New Zealand from Landcare Research. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, KML and CSV, and access via API.

  18. iFAD∞ and other flow direction algorithms with test data

    • figshare.com
    zip
    Updated Apr 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    cheng (2025). iFAD∞ and other flow direction algorithms with test data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28750988.v1
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 8, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    cheng
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The Java codes for all the drainage direction algorithms used in the study entitled “A New Multiple Flow Direction Algorithm for Determining Limited Dispersive Domain Based on Flow Aggregation Technique” are provided as an Eclipse Java project. Additionally, the test data and the output of iFAD∞ are also included for further experimentation and validation of the algorithms discussed in this study.Pengfei Wu: Work phone: +86 18351936707; E-mail: wpf@hhu.edu.cnJintao Liu: Work phone: +86 13327836738; E-mail: jtliu@hhu.edu.cn

  19. d

    Logan 10 m Terrain Analysis

    • search.dataone.org
    • hydroshare.org
    • +1more
    Updated Apr 15, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    David Tarboton (2022). Logan 10 m Terrain Analysis [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/sha256%3A4064b782bfbc0fe2abe37a1562e27cb85ee8d0f08cd15bbb338871d9583d7174
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 15, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Hydroshare
    Authors
    David Tarboton
    Area covered
    Description

    Results from Hydrologic terrain analysis performed on Logan River Basin Digital Elevation model using TauDEM

    The input digital elevation model (DEM) is Logan.tif.

    The sequence in the script script.py performs a TauDEM analysis that does the following - Remove pits (by filling them) - D8 Flow direction - D8 Contributing area - Peuker Douglas Valley skeleton - Weighted D8 contributing area on Peuker Douglas valley skeleton - Drop analysis to determine objective channel threshold - Threshold to map stream indicator raster - Streamnet to produce shapefile of the stream network

    Dinfinity analysis for wetness index and height above the nearest drainage (HAND) - Dinfinity flow direction - Dinfinity contributing area - Topographic wetness index - Distance down to stream in the vertical direction

  20. Terrain

    • opendata.rcmrd.org
    • pacificgeoportal.com
    • +6more
    Updated Jul 5, 2013
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Esri (2013). Terrain [Dataset]. https://opendata.rcmrd.org/datasets/58a541efc59545e6b7137f961d7de883
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 5, 2013
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Area covered
    Description

    This dynamic World Elevation Terrain layer returns float values representing ground heights in meters and compiles multi-resolution data from many authoritative data providers from across the globe. Heights are orthometric (sea level = 0), and water bodies that are above sea level have approximated nominal water heights.Height units: MetersUpdate Frequency: QuarterlyCoverage: World/GlobalData Sources: This layer is compiled from a variety of best available sources from several data providers. To see the coverage and extents of various datasets comprising this service in an interactive map, see World Elevation Coverage Map.What can you do with this layer?Use for Visualization: This layer is generally not optimal for direct visualization. By default, 32 bit floating point values are returned, resulting in higher bandwidth requirements. Therefore, usage should be limited to applications requiring elevation data values. Alternatively, client applications can select from numerous additional functions, applied on the server, that return rendered data. For visualizations such as multi-directional hillshade, hillshade, elevation tinted hillshade, and slope, consider using the appropriate server-side function defined on this service.Use for Analysis: Yes. This layer provides data as floating point elevation values suitable for use in analysis. There is a limit of 5000 rows x 5000 columns.Note: This layer combine data from different sources and resamples the data dynamically to the requested projection, extent and pixel size. For analyses using ArcGIS Desktop, it is recommended to filter a dataset, specify the projection, extent and cell size using the Make Image Server Layer geoprocessing tool. The extent is factor of cell size and rows/columns limit. e.g. if cell size is 10 m, the extent for analysis would be less than 50,000 m x 50,000 m.Server Functions: This layer has server functions defined for the following elevation derivatives. In ArcGIS Pro, server function can be invoked from Layer Properties - Processing Templates.

    Slope Degrees Slope Percent Aspect Ellipsoidal height Hillshade Multi-Directional Hillshade Dark Multi-Directional Hillshade Elevation Tinted Hillshade Slope Map Aspect Map Mosaic Method: This image service uses a default mosaic method of "By Attribute”, using Field 'Best' and target of 0. Each of the rasters has been attributed with ‘Best’ field value that is generally a function of the pixel size such that higher resolution datasets are displayed at higher priority. Other mosaic methods can be set, but care should be taken as the order of the rasters may change. Where required, queries can also be set to display only specific datasets such as only NED or the lock raster mosaic rule used to lock to a specific dataset.Accuracy: Accuracy will vary as a function of location and data source. Please refer to the metadata available in the layer, and follow the links to the original sources for further details. An estimate of CE90 and LE90 are included as attributes, where available.This layer allows query, identify, and export image requests. The layer is restricted to a 5,000 x 5,000 pixel limit in a single request.This layer is part of a larger collection of elevation layers that you can use to perform a variety of mapping analysis tasks.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Jeff Jenness; J.J. Wynne; Murzy Jhabvala; Nathalie Cabrol (2024). Aircraft-Borne Thermal Imagery and Derived Terrain Analysis Layers, Pisgah Lava Field, California [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5066/P9NF0L2I

Aircraft-Borne Thermal Imagery and Derived Terrain Analysis Layers, Pisgah Lava Field, California

Explore at:
3 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Jul 18, 2024
Dataset provided by
United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
Authors
Jeff Jenness; J.J. Wynne; Murzy Jhabvala; Nathalie Cabrol
License

U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically

Time period covered
Apr 11, 2011 - Apr 13, 2011
Area covered
California
Description

This dataset is one of many used in the development of the manuscript 'Advancing Cave Detection using Terrain Analysis Techniques and Thermal Imagery' by Wynne et al. 2021. Manuscript Abstract: Since the initial experiments nearly 50 years ago, techniques for detecting caves using airborne and spacecraft acquired thermal imagery have improved markedly. These advances are largely due to a combination of higher instrument sensitivity, modern computing systems, and processor-intensive analytical techniques. Through applying these advancements, our goals were to: (1) determine the utility of methods designed for terrain analysis and applied to thermal imagery; (2) analyze the usefulness of predawn and midday imagery for detecting caves; and, (3) determine which imagery type (predawn, midday, or the difference between the two) was most useful. Using forward stepwise logistic (FSL) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis for model selection, and ...

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu