Graph and download economic data for Other Operating Expenses for Monetary Authorities-Central Bank, All Establishments, Employer Firms (DISCONTINUED) (EXPOOPEF521ALLEST) from 2009 to 2012 about operating, employer firms, establishments, expenditures, services, banks, depository institutions, and USA.

As remote or hybrid work continues to be popular, office attendance has fallen. Less in-person work may increase office vacancy rates and reduce foot traffic to other businesses located in office-dense areas. Compared with the national average, most states in the Tenth Federal Reserve District have a lower share of office space in office-dense areas, but some of these areas have a higher share of bars and restaurants. The outlook for these businesses may depend on how foot traffic within office-dense areas evolves.

United States - All Other Operating Expenses for Monetary Authorities-Central Bank, All Establishments, Employer Firms was 3207.00000 Mil. of $ in January of 2020, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, United States - All Other Operating Expenses for Monetary Authorities-Central Bank, All Establishments, Employer Firms reached a record high of 3402.00000 in January of 2019 and a record low of 2548.00000 in January of 2014. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for United States - All Other Operating Expenses for Monetary Authorities-Central Bank, All Establishments, Employer Firms - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on September of 2025.

Graph and download economic data for Liabilities and Capital: Other Factors Draining Reserve Balances: Reserve Balances with Federal Reserve Banks: Wednesday Level (WRBWFRBL) from 2002-12-18 to 2025-09-24 about balance, reserves, banks, depository institutions, and USA.

It is commonly believed that the Fed's ability to control the federal funds rate stems from its ability to alter the supply of liquidity in the overnight market through open market operations. This paper uses daily data compiled by the author from the records of the Trading Desk of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York over the period March 1, 1984, through December 31, 1996. The author analyzes the Desk's use of its operating procedure in implementing monetary policy and the extent to which open market operations affect the federal funds rate-- the liquidity effect. The author finds that the operating procedure was used to guide daily open market operations. However, there is little evidence of a liquidity effect at the daily frequency and even less evidence at lower frequencies. Consistent with the absence of a liquidity effect, open market operations appear to be a relatively unimportant source of liquidity to the federal funds market.

United States - Operating Interest Expense for Monetary Authorities-Central Bank, All Establishments, Employer Firms was 102376.00000 Mil. of $ in January of 2022, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, United States - Operating Interest Expense for Monetary Authorities-Central Bank, All Establishments, Employer Firms reached a record high of 102376.00000 in January of 2022 and a record low of 0.00000 in January of 2010. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for United States - Operating Interest Expense for Monetary Authorities-Central Bank, All Establishments, Employer Firms - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on September of 2025.

The Federal Reserve (Fed) experienced an unprecedented shift in its financial performance, with its net income plummeting from ***** billion U.S. dollars in 2022 to negative ***** billion U.S. dollars in 2023 - an exceptionally sharp decrease. This negative net income in 2023 marked the lowest point in the observed period. In 2024, the net loss of the Fed increased but remained exceptionally low at negative **** billion U.S. dollars. As the majority of the Fed's net income is typically remitted to the U.S. Treasury, these earnings remittances also saw a significant decline in 2024. This drastic decline in net income occurred because of the rapidly rising interest rates in 2023.

I estimate various backward-looking and forward-looking Taylor rules augmented with variables that indicate proximity to an election and whether the Fed Chair and the majority of a chamber of Congress share the same political party affiliation to investigate whether Congress has influenced Federal Reserve policy from 1961 to 2020. I find that the Fed is susceptible to pressures from the Senate. In line with previous work, left-leaning politicians exhibit a higher tolerance for inflation. This results in the federal funds rate being lower by about 2.35 points when the Democratic party has a Senate majority. Second, while I find some evidence that the House and the Fed Chair sharing partisan affiliation results in tighter policy, this result is not robust to alternative measures of inflation. Finally, I find persuasive evidence that Congressional pressures on the Fed do not create a political monetary cycle around elections.

The Federal Reserve's balance sheet has undergone significant changes since 2007, reflecting its response to major economic crises. From a modest *** trillion U.S. dollars at the end of 2007, it ballooned to approximately *** trillion U.S. dollars by August 2025. This dramatic expansion, particularly during the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic - both of which resulted in negative annual GDP growth in the U.S. - showcases the Fed's crucial role in stabilizing the economy through expansionary monetary policies. Impact on inflation and interest rates The Fed's expansionary measures, while aimed at stimulating economic growth, have had notable effects on inflation and interest rates. Following the quantitative easing in 2020, inflation in the United States reached ***** percent in 2022, the highest since 1991. However, by July 2025, inflation had declined to *** percent. Concurrently, the Federal Reserve implemented a series of interest rate hikes, with the rate peaking at **** percent in August 2023, before the first rate cut since September 2021 occurred in September 2024. Financial implications for the Federal Reserve The expansion of the Fed's balance sheet and subsequent interest rate hikes have had significant financial implications. In 2023, the Fed reported a negative net income of ***** billion U.S. dollars, a stark contrast to the ***** billion U.S. dollars profit in 2022. This unprecedented shift was primarily due to rapidly rising interest rates, which caused the Fed's interest expenses to soar to over *** billion U.S. dollars in 2023. Despite this, the Fed's net interest income on securities acquired through open market operations reached a record high of ****** billion U.S. dollars in the same year.

The Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) is an annual exercise by the Federal Reserve to assess whether the largest bank holding companies operating in the U.S. have sufficient capital to continue operations throughout times of economic and financial stress and that they have robust, forward-looking capital-planning processes that account for their unique risks. As part of this exercise, the Federal Reserve evaluates institutions' capital adequacy, internal capital adequacy assessment processes, and their individual plans to make capital distributions, such as dividend payments or stock repurchases.

View quarterly updates and historical trends for Mountain States Agricultural Interest Rates on Operating Loans. Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas Ci…

View quarterly updates and historical trends for Oklahoma Agricultural Interest Rates on Operating Loans. Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Tra…

View quarterly updates and historical trends for Nebraska Agricultural Interest Rates on Operating Loans. Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Tra…

The Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) is normally a triennial cross-sectional survey of U.S. families. The survey data include information on families' balance sheets, pensions, income, and demographic characteristics.

Graph and download economic data for CSBS Community Bank Sentiment, Operations Expansion Index (CBSIOE) from Q2 2019 to Q2 2025 about community, business sentiment, operating, banks, depository institutions, indexes, and USA.

Many expect the establishment of a U.S. framework for stablecoins to increase demand for Treasuries, thereby supporting the Treasury market. Although stablecoin issuers are currently only a small part of the Treasury market, they could become a much larger part under some external projections. However, such a large funding shift could have important implications for other parts of the economy, such as a possible reduction in the supply of credit.

Ten-Year TIPS Yields versus Real Yields is a part of the Inflation Expectations indicator of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.

Investors have been acutely attuned to commercial real estate (CRE) risks recently due to higher interest rates and changes in how Americans work. On the surface, these risks may seem particularly concerning for small and regional banks, which tend to hold large concentrations of loans backed by commercial properties. However, we show that CRE risks can vary substantially across property types and geographic locations, suggesting that aggregate CRE exposure may be a poor measure of risk.

United States NREL: Loan Purpose: Other Current Operating Expense data was reported at 56.650 USD bn in Jun 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 49.810 USD bn for Mar 2018. United States NREL: Loan Purpose: Other Current Operating Expense data is updated quarterly, averaging 27.010 USD bn from Mar 1977 (Median) to Jun 2018, with 166 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 72.720 USD bn in Jun 1996 and a record low of 12.180 USD bn in Dec 1977. United States NREL: Loan Purpose: Other Current Operating Expense data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.KA021: Agriculture Financing: Non-Real Estate Loans to Farmers.

In March, the global coronavirus pandemic led to a period of financial stress in which credit conditions tightened at an unprecedented pace. Elements of this stress period can be explained as a classic run on “shadow banks”—nonbank financial institutions that fund long-term assets with short-term debt. Although timely Federal Reserve interventions restored some calm to markets, shadow banks remain vulnerable to future runs because they lack the safeguards available to regulated depository institutions.