Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Coal rose to 102.90 USD/T on September 17, 2025, up 1.13% from the previous day. Over the past month, Coal's price has fallen 7.30%, and is down 25.97% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Coal - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on September of 2025.
Energy production, trade and consumption statistics are provided in total and by fuel and provide an analysis of the latest 3 months data compared to the same period a year earlier. Energy price statistics cover domestic price indices, prices of road fuels and petroleum products and comparisons of international road fuel prices.
Highlights for the 3 month period June 2024 to August 2024, compared to the same period a year earlier include:
*Major Power Producers (MPPs) data published monthly, all generating companies data published quarterly.
Highlights for October 2024 compared to September 2024:
Petrol down 2.5 pence per litre and diesel also down 2.5 pence per litre. (table QEP 4.1.1)
Lead statistician Warren Evans
Statistics on monthly production, trade and consumption of coal, electricity, gas, oil and total energy include data for the UK for the period up to the end of August 2024.
Statistics on average temperatures, heating degree days, wind speeds, sun hours and rainfall include data for the UK for the period up to the end of September 2024.
Statistics on energy prices include retail price data for the UK for September 2024, and petrol & diesel data for October 2024, with EU comparative data for September 2024.
The next release of provisional monthly energy statistics will take place on Thursday 28 November 2024.
To access the data tables associated with this release please click on the relevant subject link(s) below. For further information please use the contact details provided.
Please note that the links below will always direct you to the latest data tables. If you are interested in historical data tables please contact DESNZ
Subject and table number | Energy production, trade, consumption, and weather data |
---|---|
Total Energy | Contact: Energy statistics |
ET 1.1 | Indigenous production of primary fuels |
ET 1.2 | Inland energy consumption: primary fuel input basis |
Coal | Contact: Coal statistics |
ET 2.5 | Coal production and foreign t |
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The global coal analyzer market is poised for steady growth, projected to reach $692.5 million in 2025 and maintain a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.5% from 2025 to 2033. This growth is driven by several factors. Increasing environmental regulations mandating stricter emission controls are pushing power plants and industrial facilities to adopt advanced coal analysis techniques for efficient combustion and pollution minimization. Furthermore, the growing demand for cleaner energy sources, while transitioning away from coal, still necessitates accurate coal quality assessment for optimization and blending purposes, driving demand for sophisticated analyzers. Technological advancements in coal analyzer technology, offering improved precision, speed, and automation, are also contributing factors. The market is witnessing a shift towards portable and online analyzers, enabling real-time monitoring and facilitating efficient operation optimization. Competition among key players like Thermo Fisher, Lyncis, and Malvern Panalytical is further driving innovation and price competitiveness. However, the market faces some challenges. The fluctuating prices of coal and the overall decline in coal consumption in many regions due to the global shift towards renewable energy sources pose significant restraints. Furthermore, the high initial investment cost associated with advanced coal analyzers can be a barrier for smaller enterprises, particularly in developing economies. Despite these challenges, the ongoing need for efficient and environmentally responsible coal utilization, coupled with continuous technological advancements, ensures sustained growth in the market throughout the forecast period. The diverse range of applications, encompassing power generation, mining, and research, assures a robust demand for coal analyzers across various sectors.
Consumer Prices of Hard Coal and Natural Gas in Energy Production (VAT not included)
Fact sheets and maps showing top producing countries and locations with trade and demand analysis. Case studies on specific countries.
https://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policyhttps://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policy
BASE YEAR | 2024 |
HISTORICAL DATA | 2019 - 2024 |
REPORT COVERAGE | Revenue Forecast, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, and Trends |
MARKET SIZE 2023 | 557.55(USD Billion) |
MARKET SIZE 2024 | 617.82(USD Billion) |
MARKET SIZE 2032 | 1404.4(USD Billion) |
SEGMENTS COVERED | Type ,Technology ,Coal Type ,Parameter ,Regional |
COUNTRIES COVERED | North America, Europe, APAC, South America, MEA |
KEY MARKET DYNAMICS | Growing demand for coal Increasing need for coal quality control Government regulations on coal emissions Technological advancements in coal analysis Expansion of coal mining operations |
MARKET FORECAST UNITS | USD Billion |
KEY COMPANIES PROFILED | MicrotracBEL Corporation ,Quantachrome Instruments ,Anton Paar ,Thermo Fisher Scientific ,COTECNAn ,HORIBANewparaSATEC SAn ,Seitron SAn ,CM Instruments Ltd ,Carbolite Gero Ltd ,Shimadzu ,Foss Analytical ,Malvern Panalytical ,Bruker |
MARKET FORECAST PERIOD | 2024 - 2032 |
KEY MARKET OPPORTUNITIES | Higher demand for Coal Analyser Rising investments for mining Technological advancements Growing environmental concerns Government initiatives |
COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATE (CAGR) | 10.81% (2024 - 2032) |
https://www.promarketreports.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.promarketreports.com/privacy-policy
The global market for online coal ash analyzers is experiencing robust growth, driven by stringent environmental regulations aimed at reducing coal ash emissions and the increasing demand for efficient coal utilization in power generation and other industries. The market, valued at approximately $250 million in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7% from 2025 to 2033. This growth is fueled by several key factors, including the rising adoption of advanced analytical technologies for real-time monitoring of coal ash composition, the increasing focus on optimizing coal combustion processes for enhanced energy efficiency, and the expanding coal-fired power generation capacity, particularly in developing economies. The demand for precise ash analysis is crucial for maintaining optimal boiler performance, preventing equipment damage, and ensuring compliance with environmental regulations. Different analyzer types, such as those employing X-ray fluorescence (XRF) or laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), cater to diverse application needs across various segments, including coal mines, power plants, and processing facilities. Significant regional variations are observed in market penetration. North America and Europe currently hold a substantial share, driven by the presence of established players and stringent environmental norms. However, rapid industrialization and increasing energy demands in Asia-Pacific, particularly in China and India, are anticipated to propel significant growth in this region over the forecast period. The competitive landscape comprises both established international players and regional manufacturers, leading to innovation and price competition within the market. This dynamic environment is expected to further accelerate market expansion in the coming years. Challenges, however, exist in the form of high initial investment costs associated with online analyzer implementation and the need for specialized technical expertise for operation and maintenance. This comprehensive report provides an in-depth analysis of the global online coal ash analyzers market, projected to reach $2.5 billion by 2030. We delve into market concentration, technological advancements, regulatory impacts, and competitive dynamics, offering invaluable insights for stakeholders across the coal and power generation industries. Key search terms like "coal ash analysis," "online coal analyzer," "coal quality control," and "power plant automation" are strategically integrated for enhanced search engine visibility.
The coal extraction industry has had a massive impact on the natural environment at a landscape level, the most obvious legacy of the operations being the extensive coal spoil tips apparent across the region. In recent years millions of pounds have been spent on the stabilisation and eventual reclamation of these spoil areas and their redevelopment for housing, new industry or local open spaces. In the past the potential ecological value of the tips has generally been overlooked or understated. However, old coal spoil sites are now recognised as an important habitat for a range of species and the few remaining sites in the Valleys also have cultural and community value, however general awareness of the value of these sites is low. This has resulted in a loss of site value in term of heritage, ecology, landscape and amenity and there was a need to put individual sites into a context. The former Countryside Council for Wales (CCW), which is now part of Natural Resources Wales (NRW), conducted an integrated strategic assessment of the recreational use and conservation value of heathland and associated habitats on the coal spoils of South Wales. This was intended as the first phase of a coal spoil conservation strategy which incorporated the results of additional archaeological and community assessment. The study was limited to the area covered by Torfaen, Merthyr Tydfil, Caerphilly, Rhondda Cynon Taf and Blaenau Gwent County Borough Councils. A Coal Spoil Conservation Strategy was initiated and this dataset includes the results from different phases of the project (see 'contains' field). The aim of this data capture was to provide background data for the delivery of a consistent strategy for local biodiversity action and amenity enhancement. The results of an archaeological and community assessment were also incorporated. The study suggests a classification for types of coal spoil and assesses the ecological value of a large number of sites.
This engineering technical report discusses at a basic level the current feasibility of using Lake Phillipson coal for electrical power generation, with the particular aim of determining those factors requiring more detailed evaluation in the... This engineering technical report discusses at a basic level the current feasibility of using Lake Phillipson coal for electrical power generation, with the particular aim of determining those factors requiring more detailed evaluation in the future. The design, construction and commissioning time scale provided by the proponent has been used by the authors for formulating a mining plan for the supply of coal from the Lake Phillipson deposits to such a power station. From the presentation, the cost of power generated for a particular coal fuel cost, under certain engineering conditions assumed for the report, can be estimated. Some of the controlling assumptions made are as follows: (a) there should be a 2000 megawatts base load station. This size is related to the estimated requirements of a proposed 6000 tonnes Separative Work Units capacity Uranium Enrichment Plant (using the gaseous diffusion process). The load characteristics for such a plant have not been considered. (b) the project will have an installed generating capacity at 3000 megawatts (for the 2000 megawatts base station), since for this study the station is assumed to be independent of the existing South Australian power grid, and so a 50% reserve capacity is provided. (c) there must be provision of data to permit the comparison of sites for said power station at either Lake Phillipson or Port Augusta. These locations were nominated to allow cost comparisons to be made for a station located at the mine site versus one built at the coast, and to highlight problems related to each of these locations. (d) the installation design should permit transmission of the station's entire power output to the Eastern States grid. This operating requirement was included to provide broad capital estimates and comments on the technical aspects of such transmission. (e) coal cost and transport cost estimates should be provided. Based on likely power station coal fuel consumption rates of either 5 million or 10 million tonnes per annum, a range of coal production costs (from $6 to $19 per tonne at mine site) and railway transport costs to Port Augusta ($5 to $9 per tonne) was selected to allow the consultants to prepare a graphical presentation of estimated cost of power generation compared to coal cost. When definite coal production costs are developed, these can be applied to the graphs to estimate associated power costs. (f) adequate cooling water volumes and quality will be available at both Lake Phillipson or Port Augusta. This assumption had to be made to allow the basic study to get underway, although the consultants stipulate that at Lake Phillipson a suitable supply, presently undefined, will need to be proved before a power station located there can be further considered. Present indications are that the quality of groundwater available from dewatering of the West Basin deposit would preclude its direct use for cooling systems. (g) coal quality estimates be used which have been compiled from analyses done on the 'F' seam of the Main Basin deposit; this is the only detailed information currently available, but is considered to provide a reasonable guide to coal properties for combustion purposes. Ultimately, however, to safely design for the burning of Lake Phillipson coal in a power station, it will be necessary to conduct detailed sampling and analyses of the coal units from the selected mining area, preferably leading to the burning of a bulk sample in an existing power station. The characteristics of the coal related to its sodium, potassium and magnesium content are considered to require most attention in the future due to their influence on ash fusion properties. The pronounced content of these elements possibly results from the high salinity of the groundwater in aquifers associated with the coal seams.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
CPI: Weights: Non Food: Fuel: Coal data was reported at 0.070 % in 2019. This records an increase from the previous number of 0.058 % for 2018. CPI: Weights: Non Food: Fuel: Coal data is updated yearly, averaging 0.060 % from Dec 2012 (Median) to 2019, with 8 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.070 % in 2019 and a record low of 0.054 % in 2014. CPI: Weights: Non Food: Fuel: Coal data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Federal State Statistics Service. The data is categorized under Russia Premium Database’s Inflation – Table RU.IA027: Consumer Price Index: Weights.
Highlights for the 3 month period October to December 2018, compared to the same period a year earlier include:
*Major Power Producers (MPPs) data published monthly, all generating companies data published quarterly.
Highlights for February 2019 compared to January 2019:
Lead statistician Warren Evans, Tel 0300 068 5059
Press enquiries: Tel 020 7215 6140 / 020 7215 8931
Statistics on monthly production and consumption of coal, electricity, gas, oil and total energy include data for the UK for the period up to the end of December 2018.
Statistics on average temperatures, wind speeds, sun hours and rainfall include data for the UK for the period up to the end of January 2019.
Statistics on energy prices include retail price data for the UK for January 2019, and petrol & diesel data for February 2019, with EU comparative data for January 2019.
The next release of provisional monthly energy statistics will take place on 28 March 2019.
To access the data tables associated with this release please click on the relevant subject link(s) below. For further information please use the contact details provided.
Please note that the links below will always direct you to the latest data tables. If you are interested in historical data tables please contact BEIS (kevin.harris@beis.gov.uk)
Subject and table number | Energy production and consumption, and weather data |
---|---|
Total Energy | Contact: Kevin Harris, Tel: 0300 068 5041 |
ET 1.1 | Indigenous production of primary fuels |
ET 1.2 | Inland energy consumption: primary fuel input basis |
Coal | Contact: Coal statistics, Tel: 0300 068 5050 |
ET 2.5 | Coal production and foreign trade |
ET 2.6 | Coal consumption and coal stocks |
Oil | Contact: Nick Jesson |
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is a critical technology to realize carbon neutrality target in the Chinese coal-fired power sector, which emitted 3.7 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide in 2017. However, CCUS technology is often viewed as an “alternative technology” option owing to common perceptions of relatively high cost and potential risks. This study indicates that coal power CCUS is likely to be a cost-effective and key technology for helping China reach the ambitious goal of carbon neutrality. This comprehensive, national-scale assessment of CCUS deployment on coal power in China is based on a unique bottom-up approach that includes site selection, coal plant screening, techno-economic analysis, and carbon dioxide source-sink matching. Analysis indicates that, based on 2017 costs and assumptions, more than 70% of coal power plants in this study could be cost-competitive with natural gas-fired power plants, and 22–58% would be cost-competitive with onshore wind generation. These insights suggest that the commercialization of CCUS technology in the coal power sector in China is a viable route toward decarbonizing the economy if a grid price policy similar to that of renewables and natural gas power is applied.
The current price of petroleum and the possibility of foreign embargoes have prompted the United states to search for alternative sources of energy. Coal offers one possibility since the U. S. has some of the world's largest deposits. Unfortunately, the majority of the known reserves in the U. S. are not economically recoverable at the present time. Therefore, the conversion of coal in place under ground into combustible gases or feedstock's, termed underground coal gasification, promises to become an important method of coal utilization in the future. The U. S. coal resource that is suitable for UCG, and not currently suitable for conventional mining methods, ahs been estimated at nearly 2 trillion tons.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Data is sourced from the World Development Indicators and from the Website of British Petroleum for Oil prices, gas price and coal prices.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Iron Ore rose to 105.42 USD/T on September 16, 2025, up 0.10% from the previous day. Over the past month, Iron Ore's price has risen 3.74%, and is up 14.61% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Iron Ore - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on September of 2025.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Coal rose to 102.90 USD/T on September 17, 2025, up 1.13% from the previous day. Over the past month, Coal's price has fallen 7.30%, and is down 25.97% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Coal - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on September of 2025.