This data set includes daily, population-weighted mean values of various heat metrics for every county in the contiguous United States from 2000-2020. The dataset methodology, usage notes, and additional citations are published in Scientific Data (see reference below for Spangler et al. [2022]). Minimum, maximum, and mean ambient temperature, dew-point temperature, humidex, heat index, net effective temperature, wet-bulb globe temperature, and Universal Thermal Climate Index are included. Note that Monroe County, Florida (FIPS: 12087) and Nantucket County, Massachusetts (FIPS 25019) are missing due to unavailability of ERA5-Land data for Key West, Florida and Nantucket, MA. To use these data, assign the data from the .Rds file to a new data frame in R using the readRDS() function. Please cite the use of this data set with the following reference. Note that additional citations for specific variables can be found in Table 2.

K.R. Spangler, S. Liang, and G.A. Wellenius. "Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature, Universal Thermal Climate Index, and Other Heat Metrics for US Counties, 2000-2020." Scientific Data (2022). doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01405-3

This data set contains modified Copernicus Climate Change Service information (2022), as described and cited in the manuscript referenced above. Neither the European Commission nor ECMWF is responsible for any use that may be made of the Copernicus information or data it contains. This data set is provided “as is” with no warranty of any kind.

This dataset includes links to the PoroTomo DAS data in both SEG-Y and hdf5 (via h5py and HSDS with h5pyd) formats with tutorial notebooks for use. Data are hosted on Amazon Web Services (AWS) Simple Storage Service (S3) through the Open Energy Data Initiative (OEDI). Also included are links to the documentation for the dataset, Jupyter Notebook tutorials for working with the data as it is stored in AWS S3, and links to data viewers in OEDI for the horizontal (DASH) and vertical (DASV) DAS datasets. Horizontal DAS (DASH) data collection began 3/8/16, paused, and then started again on 3/11/2016 and ended 3/26/2016 using zigzag trenched fiber optic cabels. Vertical DAS (DASV) data collection began 3/17/2016 and ended 3/28/16 using a fiber optic cable through the first 363 m of a vertical well. These are raw data files from the DAS deployment at (DASH) and below (DASV) the surface during testing at the PoroTomo Natural Laboratory at Brady Hot Spring in Nevada. SEG-Y and hdf5 files are stored in 30 second files organized into directories by day. The hdf5 files available via HSDS are stored in daily files. Metadata includes information on the timing of recording gaps and a file count is included that lists the number of files from each day of recording. These data are available for download without login credentials through the free and publicly accessible Open Energy Data Initiative (OEDI) data viewer which allows users to browse and download individual or groups of files.

These data were used to examine grammatical structures and patterns within a set of geospatial glossary definitions. Objectives of our study were to analyze the semantic structure of input definitions, use this information to build triple structures of RDF graph data, upload our lexicon to a knowledge graph software, and perform SPARQL queries on the data. Upon completion of this study, SPARQL queries were proven to effectively convey graph triples which displayed semantic significance. These data represent and characterize the lexicon of our input text which are used to form graph triples. These data were collected in 2024 by passing text through multiple Python programs utilizing spaCy (a natural language processing library) and its pre-trained English transformer pipeline. Before data was processed by the Python programs, input definitions were first rewritten as natural language and formatted as tabular data. Passages were then tokenized and characterized by their part-of-spee ...

This dataset consists of 127 wideband and 21 long-period magnetotelluric (MT) stations collected from 2016-2019 across parts of Missouri, Arkansas, Tennessee, Illinois, and Kentucky. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) acquired these data as part of regional investigations into the geologic and tectonic framework of the area and to support mineral resource and geologic hazard investigations. These data have been used to generate a 3D regional conductivity model of the area. Files included in this publication include measured electric- and magnetic-field time series as well as estimated impedance and vertical-magnetic field transfer functions. The data included here are for MT station rfr108 in the Reelfoot Rift survey region. A shapefile with station information for all stations in this dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.5066/P9F7HFH7.

Terms of UseData Limitations and DisclaimerThe user’s use of and/or reliance on the information contained in the Document shall be at the user’s own risk and expense. MassDEP disclaims any responsibility for any loss or harm that may result to the user of this data or to any other person due to the user’s use of the Document.This is an ongoing data development project. Attempts have been made to contact all PWS systems, but not all have responded with information on their service area. MassDEP will continue to collect and verify this information. Some PWS service areas included in this datalayer have not been verified by the PWS or the municipality involved, but since many of those areas are based on information published online by the municipality, the PWS, or in a publicly available report, they are included in the estimated PWS service area datalayer.Please note: All PWS service area delineations are estimates for broad planning purposes and should only be used as a guide. The data is not appropriate for site-specific or parcel-specific analysis. Not all properties within a PWS service area are necessarily served by the system, and some properties outside the mapped service areas could be served by the PWS – please contact the relevant PWS. Not all service areas have been confirmed by the systems.Please use the following citation to reference these data:MassDEP, Water Utility Resilience Program. 2025. Community and Non-Transient Non-Community Public Water System Service Area (PubV2025_3).IMPORTANT NOTICE: This MassDEP Estimated Water Service datalayer may not be complete, may contain errors, omissions, and other inaccuracies and the data are subject to change. This version is published through MassGIS. We want to learn about the data uses. If you use this dataset, please notify staff in the Water Utility Resilience Program (WURP@mass.gov).This GIS datalayer represents approximate service areas for Public Water Systems (PWS) in Massachusetts. In 2017, as part of its “Enhancing Resilience and Emergency Preparedness of Water Utilities through Improved Mapping” (Critical Infrastructure Mapping Project ), the MassDEP Water Utility Resilience Program (WURP) began to uniformly map drinking water service areas throughout Massachusetts using information collected from various sources. Along with confirming existing public water system (PWS) service area information, the project collected and verified estimated service area delineations for PWSs not previously delineated and will continue to update the information contained in the datalayers. As of the date of publication, WURP has delineated Community (COM) and Non-Transient Non-Community (NTNC) service areas. Transient non-community (TNCs) are not part of this mapping project.Layers and Tables:The MassDEP Estimated Public Water System Service Area data comprises two polygon feature classes and a supporting table. Some data fields are populated from the MassDEP Drinking Water Program’s Water Quality Testing System (WQTS) and Annual Statistical Reports (ASR).The Community Water Service Areas feature class (PWS_WATER_SERVICE_AREA_COMM_POLY) includes polygon features that represent the approximate service areas for PWS classified as Community systems.The NTNC Water Service Areas feature class (PWS_WATER_SERVICE_AREA_NTNC_POLY) includes polygon features that represent the approximate service areas for PWS classified as Non-Transient Non-Community systems.The Unlocated Sites List table (PWS_WATER_SERVICE_AREA_USL) contains a list of known, unmapped active Community and NTNC PWS services areas at the time of publication.ProductionData UniversePublic Water Systems in Massachusetts are permitted and regulated through the MassDEP Drinking Water Program. The WURP has mapped service areas for all active and inactive municipal and non-municipal Community PWSs in MassDEP’s Water Quality Testing Database (WQTS). Community PWS refers to a public water system that serves at least 15 service connections used by year-round residents or regularly serves at least 25 year-round residents.All active and inactive NTNC PWS were also mapped using information contained in WQTS. An NTNC or Non-transient Non-community Water System refers to a public water system that is not a community water system and that has at least 15 service connections or regularly serves at least 25 of the same persons or more approximately four or more hours per day, four or more days per week, more than six months or 180 days per year, such as a workplace providing water to its employees.These data may include declassified PWSs. Staff will work to rectify the status/water services to properties previously served by declassified PWSs and remove or incorporate these service areas as needed.Maps of service areas for these systems were collected from various online and MassDEP sources to create service areas digitally in GIS. Every PWS is assigned a unique PWSID by MassDEP that incorporates the municipal ID of the municipality it serves (or the largest municipality it serves if it serves multiple municipalities). Some municipalities contain more than one PWS, but each PWS has a unique PWSID. The Estimated PWS Service Area datalayer, therefore, contains polygons with a unique PWSID for each PWS service area.A service area for a community PWS may serve all of one municipality (e.g. Watertown Water Department), multiple municipalities (e.g. Abington-Rockland Joint Water Works), all or portions of two or more municipalities (e.g. Provincetown Water Dept which serves all of Provincetown and a portion of Truro), or a portion of a municipality (e.g. Hyannis Water System, which is one of four PWSs in the town of Barnstable).Some service areas have not been mapped but their general location is represented by a small circle which serves as a placeholder. The location of these circles are estimates based on the general location of the source wells or the general estimated location of the service area - these do not represent the actual service area.Service areas were mapped initially from 2017 to 2022 and reflect varying years for which service is implemented for that service area boundary. WURP maintains the dataset quarterly with annual data updates; however, the dataset may not include all current active PWSs. A list of unmapped PWS systems is included in the USL table PWS_WATER_SERVICE_AREA_USL available for download with the dataset. Some PWSs that are not mapped may have come online after this iteration of the mapping project; these will be reconciled and mapped during the next phase of the WURP project. PWS IDs that represent regional or joint boards with (e.g. Tri Town Water Board, Randolph/Holbrook Water Board, Upper Cape Regional Water Cooperative) will not be mapped because their individual municipal service areas are included in this datalayer.PWSs that do not have corresponding sources, may be part of consecutive systems, may have been incorporated into another PWSs, reclassified as a different type of PWS, or otherwise taken offline. PWSs that have been incorporated, reclassified, or taken offline will be reconciled during the next data update.Methodologies and Data SourcesSeveral methodologies were used to create service area boundaries using various sources, including data received from the systems in response to requests for information from the MassDEP WURP project, information on file at MassDEP, and service area maps found online at municipal and PWS websites. When provided with water line data rather than generalized areas, 300-foot buffers were created around the water lines to denote service areas and then edited to incorporate generalizations. Some municipalities submitted parcel data or address information to be used in delineating service areas.Verification ProcessSmall-scale PDF file maps with roads and other infrastructure were sent to every PWS for corrections or verifications. For small systems, such as a condominium complex or residential school, the relevant parcels were often used as the basis for the delineated service area. In towns where 97% or more of their population is served by the PWS and no other service area delineation was available, the town boundary was used as the service area boundary. Some towns responded to the request for information or verification of service areas by stating that the town boundary should be used since all or nearly all of the municipality is served by the PWS.Sources of information for estimated drinking water service areasThe following information was used to develop estimated drinking water service areas:EOEEA Water Assets Project (2005) water lines (these were buffered to create service areas)Horsely Witten Report 2008Municipal Master Plans, Open Space Plans, Facilities Plans, Water Supply System Webpages, reports and online interactive mapsGIS data received from PWSDetailed infrastructure mapping completed through the MassDEP WURP Critical Infrastructure InitiativeIn the absence of other service area information, for municipalities served by a town-wide water system serving at least 97% of the population, the municipality’s boundary was used. Determinations of which municipalities are 97% or more served by the PWS were made based on the Percent Water Service Map created in 2018 by MassDEP based on various sources of information including but not limited to:The Winter population served submitted by the PWS in the ASR submittalThe number of services from WQTS as a percent of developed parcelsTaken directly from a Master Plan, Water Department Website, Open Space Plan, etc. found onlineCalculated using information from the town on the population servedMassDEP staff estimateHorsely Witten Report 2008Calculation based on Water System Areas Mapped through MassDEP WURP Critical Infrastructure Initiative, 2017-2022Information found in publicly available PWS planning documents submitted to MassDEP or as part of infrastructure planningMaintenanceThe

Over the last two observations, the revenue is forecast to significantly increase in all regions. From the selected regions, the ranking by revenue in the data center market is forecast to be led by Central & Western Europe with 84.18 billion euro. In contrast, the ranking is trailed by Eastern Europe with 7.34 billion euro, recording a difference of 76.84 billion euro to Central & Western Europe. The Statista Market Insights cover a broad range of additional markets.

Data Entry Service Market Outlook

The global data entry service market size is poised to experience significant growth, with the market expected to rise from USD 2.5 billion in 2023 to USD 4.8 billion by 2032, achieving a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7.5% over the forecast period. This growth can be attributed to several factors including the increasing adoption of digital technologies, the rising demand for data accuracy and integrity, and the need for businesses to manage vast amounts of data efficiently.

One of the key growth factors driving the data entry service market is the rapid digital transformation across various industries. As businesses continue to digitize their operations, the volume of data generated has increased exponentially. This data needs to be accurately entered, processed, and managed to derive meaningful insights. The demand for data entry services has surged as companies seek to outsource these non-core activities, enabling them to focus on their primary business operations. Additionally, the widespread adoption of cloud-based solutions and big data analytics has further fueled the demand for efficient data management services.

Another significant driver of market growth is the increasing need for data accuracy and integrity. Inaccurate or incomplete data can lead to poor decision-making, financial losses, and a decrease in operational efficiency. Organizations are increasingly recognizing the importance of maintaining high-quality data and are investing in data entry services to ensure that their databases are accurate, up-to-date, and reliable. This is particularly crucial for industries such as healthcare, BFSI, and retail, where precise data is essential for regulatory compliance, customer relationship management, and operational efficiency.

The cost-effectiveness of outsourcing data entry services is also contributing to market growth. By outsourcing these tasks to specialized service providers, organizations can save on labor costs, reduce operational expenses, and improve productivity. Service providers often have access to advanced tools and technologies, as well as skilled professionals who can perform data entry tasks more efficiently and accurately. This not only leads to cost savings but also allows businesses to reallocate resources to more strategic activities, driving overall growth.

From a regional perspective, the Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the highest growth in the data entry service market during the forecast period. This can be attributed to the region's strong IT infrastructure, the presence of numerous outsourcing service providers, and the growing adoption of digital technologies across various industries. North America and Europe are also significant markets, driven by the high demand for data management services in sectors such as healthcare, BFSI, and retail. The Middle East & Africa and Latin America are anticipated to experience steady growth, supported by increasing investments in digital infrastructure and the rising awareness of the benefits of data entry services.

Service Type Analysis

The data entry service market can be segmented into various service types, including online data entry, offline data entry, data processing, data conversion, data cleansing, and others. Each of these service types plays a crucial role in ensuring the accuracy, integrity, and usability of data. Online data entry services involve entering data directly into an online system or database, which is essential for real-time data management and accessibility. This service type is particularly popular in industries such as e-commerce, where timely and accurate data entry is critical for inventory management and customer service.

Offline data entry services, on the other hand, involve entering data into offline systems or databases, which are later synchronized with online systems. This service type is often used in industries where internet connectivity may be unreliable or where data security is a primary concern. Offline data entry is also essential for processing historical data or data that is collected through physical forms and documents. The demand for offline data entry services is driven by the need for accurate and timely data entry in sectors such as manufacturing, government, and healthcare.

Data processing services involve the manipulation, transformation, and analysis of raw data to produce meaningful information. This includes tasks such as data validation, data sorting, data aggregation, and data analysis. Data processing is a critical componen

This file contains raw data for cameras and wearables of the ConfLab dataset.

./cameras

contains the overhead video recordings for 9 cameras (cam2-10) in MP4 files.

These cameras cover the whole interaction floor, with camera 2 capturing the

bottom of the scene layout, and camera 10 capturing top of the scene layout.

Note that cam5 ran out of battery before the other cameras and thus the recordings

are cut short. However, cam4 and 6 contain significant overlap with cam 5, to

reconstruct any information needed.

Note that the annotations are made and provided in 2 minute segments.

The annotated portions of the video include the last 3min38sec of x2xxx.MP4

video files, and the first 12 min of x3xxx.MP4 files for cameras (2,4,6,8,10),

with "x" being the placeholder character in the mp4 file names. If one wishes

to separate the video into 2 min segments as we did, the "video-splitting.sh"

script is provided.

./camera-calibration contains the camera instrinsic files obtained from

https://github.com/idiap/multicamera-calibration. Camera extrinsic parameters can

be calculated using the existing intrinsic parameters and the instructions in the

multicamera-calibration repo. The coordinates in the image are provided by the

crosses marked on the floor, which are visible in the video recordings.

The crosses are 1m apart (=100cm).

./wearables

subdirectory includes the IMU, proximity and audio data from each

participant at the Conflab event (48 in total). In the directory numbered

by participant ID, the following data are included:

1. raw audio file

2. proximity (bluetooth) pings (RSSI) file (raw and csv) and a visualization

3. Tri-axial accelerometer data (raw and csv) and a visualization

4. Tri-axial gyroscope data (raw and csv) and a visualization

5. Tri-axial magnetometer data (raw and csv) and a visualization

6. Game rotation vector (raw and csv), recorded in quaternions.

All files are timestamped.

The sampling frequencies are:

- audio: 1250 Hz

- rest: around 50Hz. However, the sample rate is not fixed

and instead the timestamps should be used.

For rotation, the game rotation vector's output frequency is limited by the

actual sampling frequency of the magnetometer. For more information, please refer to

https://invensense.tdk.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/DS-000189-ICM-20948-v1.3.pdf

Audio files in this folder are in raw binary form. The following can be used to convert

them to WAV files (1250Hz):

ffmpeg -f s16le -ar 1250 -ac 1 -i /path/to/audio/file

Synchronization of cameras and werables data

Raw videos contain timecode information which matches the timestamps of the data in

the "wearables" folder. The starting timecode of a video can be read as:

ffprobe -hide_banner -show_streams -i /path/to/video

./audio

./sync: contains wav files per each subject

./sync_files: auxiliary csv files used to sync the audio. Can be used to improve the synchronization.

The code used for syncing the audio can be found here:

https://github.com/TUDelft-SPC-Lab/conflab/tree/master/preprocessing/audio

This is version v3.2.0.2021f of Met Office Hadley Centre's Integrated Surface Database, HadISD. These data are global sub-daily surface meteorological data. The quality controlled variables in this dataset are: temperature, dewpoint temperature, sea-level pressure, wind speed and direction, cloud data (total, low, mid and high level). Past significant weather and precipitation data are also included, but have not been quality controlled, so their quality and completeness cannot be guaranteed. Quality control flags and data values which have been removed during the quality control process are provided in the qc_flags and flagged_values fields, and ancillary data files show the station listing with a station listing with IDs, names and location information. The data are provided as one NetCDF file per station. Files in the station_data folder station data files have the format "station_code"_HadISD_HadOBS_19310101-20220101_v3.2.1.2021f.nc. The station codes can be found under the docs tab. The station codes file has five columns as follows: 1) station code, 2) station name 3) station latitude 4) station longitude 5) station height. To keep informed about updates, news and announcements follow the HadOBS team on twitter @metofficeHadOBS. For more detailed information e.g bug fixes, routine updates and other exploratory analysis, see the HadISD blog: http://hadisd.blogspot.co.uk/ References: When using the dataset in a paper you must cite the following papers (see Docs for link to the publications) and this dataset (using the "citable as" reference) : Dunn, R. J. H., (2019), HadISD version 3: monthly updates, Hadley Centre Technical Note. Dunn, R. J. H., Willett, K. M., Parker, D. E., and Mitchell, L.: Expanding HadISD: quality-controlled, sub-daily station data from 1931, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 473-491, doi:10.5194/gi-5-473-2016, 2016. Dunn, R. J. H., et al. (2012), HadISD: A Quality Controlled global synoptic report database for selected variables at long-term stations from 1973-2011, Clim. Past, 8, 1649-1679, 2012, doi:10.5194/cp-8-1649-2012 Smith, A., N. Lott, and R. Vose, 2011: The Integrated Surface Database: Recent Developments and Partnerships. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 92, 704–708, doi:10.1175/2011BAMS3015.1 For a homogeneity assessment of HadISD please see this following reference Dunn, R. J. H., K. M. Willett, C. P. Morice, and D. E. Parker. "Pairwise homogeneity assessment of HadISD." Climate of the Past 10, no. 4 (2014): 1501-1522. doi:10.5194/cp-10-1501-2014, 2014.

This CNIG data standard concerns local planning documents (LDPs) and land use plans (POSs that are PLU). This data standard provides a technical framework describing in detail how to dematerialise these town planning documents in a spatial database that can be used by a GIS tool and interoperable. This standard of data covers both the graphical plans of sectors and the information overlaying them. This CNIG data standard was developed on the basis of the specifications for the dematerialisation of planning documents created in 2012 by the CNIG, itself based on the consolidated version of the urban planning code dated 16 March 2012. The recommendations of these two documents are consistent even if their purpose is not the same. The CNIG data standard provides definitions and a structure for organising and storing spatial data from communal maps in an infrastructure, while the CNIG specifications are used to frame the digitisation of these data. The ‘Data Structure’ section presented in this CNIG standard provides additional recommendations for the storage of data files. These are specific choices for the common data infrastructure of the ministries responsible for agriculture and sustainable development, which do not apply outside their context.

Abstract

Within the frame of PCBS' efforts in providing official Palestinian statistics in the different life aspects of Palestinian society and because the wide spread of Computer, Internet and Mobile Phone among the Palestinian people, and the important role they may play in spreading knowledge and culture and contribution in formulating the public opinion, PCBS conducted the Household Survey on Information and Communications Technology, 2014.

The main objective of this survey is to provide statistical data on Information and Communication Technology in the Palestine in addition to providing data on the following: -

· Prevalence of computers and access to the Internet. · Study the penetration and purpose of Technology use.

Geographic coverage

Palestine (West Bank and Gaza Strip) , type of locality (Urban, Rural, Refugee Camps) and governorate

Analysis unit

Household. Person 10 years and over .

Universe

All Palestinian households and individuals whose usual place of residence in Palestine with focus on persons aged 10 years and over in year 2014.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

Sampling Frame The sampling frame consists of a list of enumeration areas adopted in the Population, Housing and Establishments Census of 2007. Each enumeration area has an average size of about 124 households. These were used in the first phase as Preliminary Sampling Units in the process of selecting the survey sample.

Sample Size The total sample size of the survey was 7,268 households, of which 6,000 responded.

Sample Design The sample is a stratified clustered systematic random sample. The design comprised three phases:

Phase I: Random sample of 240 enumeration areas. Phase II: Selection of 25 households from each enumeration area selected in phase one using systematic random selection. Phase III: Selection of an individual (10 years or more) in the field from the selected households; KISH TABLES were used to ensure indiscriminate selection.

Sample Strata Distribution of the sample was stratified by: 1- Governorate (16 governorates, J1). 2- Type of locality (urban, rural and camps).

Sampling deviation

-

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

The survey questionnaire consists of identification data, quality controls and three main sections: Section I: Data on household members that include identification fields, the characteristics of household members (demographic and social) such as the relationship of individuals to the head of household, sex, date of birth and age.

Section II: Household data include information regarding computer processing, access to the Internet, and possession of various media and computer equipment. This section includes information on topics related to the use of computer and Internet, as well as supervision by households of their children (5-17 years old) while using the computer and Internet, and protective measures taken by the household in the home.

Section III: Data on persons (aged 10 years and over) about computer use, access to the Internet and possession of a mobile phone.

Cleaning operations

Preparation of Data Entry Program: This stage included preparation of the data entry programs using an ACCESS package and defining data entry control rules to avoid errors, plus validation inquiries to examine the data after it had been captured electronically.

Data Entry: The data entry process started on 8 May 2014 and ended on 23 June 2014. The data entry took place at the main PCBS office and in field offices using 28 data clerks.

Editing and Cleaning procedures: Several measures were taken to avoid non-sampling errors. These included editing of questionnaires before data entry to check field errors, using a data entry application that does not allow mistakes during the process of data entry, and then examining the data by using frequency and cross tables. This ensured that data were error free; cleaning and inspection of the anomalous values were conducted to ensure harmony between the different questions on the questionnaire.

Response rate

Response Rates= 79%

Sampling error estimates

There are many aspects of the concept of data quality; this includes the initial planning of the survey to the dissemination of the results and how well users understand and use the data. There are three components to the quality of statistics: accuracy, comparability, and quality control procedures.

Checks on data accuracy cover many aspects of the survey and include statistical errors due to the use of a sample, non-statistical errors resulting from field workers or survey tools, and response rates and their effect on estimations. This section includes:

Statistical Errors Data of this survey may be affected by statistical errors due to the use of a sample and not a complete enumeration. Therefore, certain differences can be expected in comparison with the real values obtained through censuses. Variances were calculated for the most important indicators.

Variance calculations revealed that there is no problem in disseminating results nationally or regionally (the West Bank, Gaza Strip), but some indicators show high variance by governorate, as noted in the tables of the main report.

Non-Statistical Errors Non-statistical errors are possible at all stages of the project, during data collection or processing. These are referred to as non-response errors, response errors, interviewing errors and data entry errors. To avoid errors and reduce their effects, strenuous efforts were made to train the field workers intensively. They were trained on how to carry out the interview, what to discuss and what to avoid, and practical and theoretical training took place during the training course. Training manuals were provided for each section of the questionnaire, along with practical exercises in class and instructions on how to approach respondents to reduce refused cases. Data entry staff were trained on the data entry program, which was tested before starting the data entry process.

Several measures were taken to avoid non-sampling errors. These included editing of questionnaires before data entry to check field errors, using a data entry application that does not allow mistakes during the process of data entry, and then examining the data by using frequency and cross tables. This ensured that data were error free; cleaning and inspection of the anomalous values were conducted to ensure harmony between the different questions on the questionnaire.

The sources of non-statistical errors can be summarized as: 1. Some of the households were not at home and could not be interviewed, and some households refused to be interviewed. 2. In unique cases, errors occurred due to the way the questions were asked by interviewers and respondents misunderstood some of the questions.

This layer shows Educational Attainment. This is shown by state and county boundaries. This service contains the 2018-2022 release of data from the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. This layer is symbolized to show the Population 25 years and over - Bachelor's Degree or higher (%). To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2018-2022ACS Table(s): DP02Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: January 18, 2022National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:Boundaries come from the Cartographic Boundaries via US Census TIGER geodatabases. Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates, and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines clipped for cartographic purposes. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters). The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico. The Counties (and equivalent) layer contains 3221 records - all counties and equivalent, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico municipios. See Areas Published. Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells.Margin of error (MOE) values of -555555555 in the API (or "*****" (five asterisks) on data.census.gov) are displayed as 0 in this dataset. The estimates associated with these MOEs have been controlled to independent counts in the ACS weighting and have zero sampling error. So, the MOEs are effectively zeroes, and are treated as zeroes in MOE calculations. Other negative values on the API, such as -222222222, -666666666, -888888888, and -999999999, all represent estimates or MOEs that can't be calculated or can't be published, usually due to small sample sizes. All of these are rendered in this dataset as null (blank) values.

These instructional videos walk users through the portal and its different features.

These data were used to drive and evaluate Jules Investigation Model (JIM) snow simulations. The data provided are the forcing data used for the "deterministic" runs as described in Winstral et al., 2019. The bias-detecting ensemble (Winstral et al., 2019) used observed snow depths (HS) to detect biases in these deterministic simulations related to precipitation and energy inputs to JIM. Simulations that included the BDE evaluations substantially improved JIM simulations.

In 2008, a group of uninsured low-income adults in Oregon was selected by lottery to be given the chance to apply for Medicaid. This lottery provides an opportunity to gauge the effects of expanding access to public health insurance on the health care use, financial strain, and health of low-income adults using a randomized controlled design. The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment follows and compares those selected in the lottery (treatment group) with those not selected (control group). The data collected and provided here include data from in-person interviews, three mail surveys, emergency department records, and administrative records on Medicaid enrollment, the initial lottery sign-up list, welfare benefits, and mortality. This data collection has seven data files: Dataset 1 contains administrative data on the lottery from the state of Oregon. These data include demographic characteristics that were recorded when individuals signed up for the lottery, date of lottery draw, and information on who was selected for the lottery, applied for the lotteried Medicaid plan if selected, and whose application for the lotteried plan was approved. Also included are Oregon mortality data for 2008 and 2009. Dataset 2 contains information from the state of Oregon on the individuals' participation in Medicaid, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF). Datasets 3-5 contain the data from the initial, six month, and 12 month mail surveys, respectively. Topics covered by the surveys include demographic characteristics; health insurance, access to health care and health care utilization; health care needs, experiences, and costs; overall health status and changes in health; and depression and medical conditions and use of medications to treat them. Dataset 6 contains an analysis subset of the variables from the in-person interviews. Topics covered by the survey questionnaire include overall health, health insurance coverage, health care access, health care utilization, conditions and treatments, health behaviors, medical and dental costs, and demographic characteristics. The interviewers also obtained blood pressure and anthropometric measurements and collected dried blood spots to measure levels of cholesterol, glycated hemoglobin and C-reactive protein. Dataset 7 contains an analysis subset of the variables the study obtained for all emergency department (ED) visits to twelve hospitals in the Portland area during 2007-2009. These variables capture total hospital costs, ED costs, and the number of ED visits categorized by time of the visit (daytime weekday or nighttime and weekends), necessity of the visit (emergent, ED care needed, non-preventable; emergent, ED care needed, preventable; emergent, primary care treatable), ambulatory case sensitive status, whether or not the patient was hospitalized, and the reason for the visit (e.g., injury, abdominal pain, chest pain, headache, and mental disorders). The collection also includes a ZIP archive (Dataset 8) with Stata programs that replicate analyses reported in three articles by the principal investigators and others: Finkelstein, Amy et al "The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment: Evidence from the First Year". The Quarterly Journal of Economics. August 2012. Vol 127(3). Baicker, Katherine et al "The Oregon Experiment - Effects of Medicaid on Clinical Outcomes". New England Journal of Medicine. 2 May 2013. Vol 368(18). Taubman, Sarah et al "Medicaid Increases Emergency Department Use: Evidence from Oregon's Health Insurance Experiment". Science. 2 Jan 2014.

This is a MD iMAP hosted service layer. Find more information at http://imap.maryland.gov. These data represent the results of data collection/processing for a specific Department of Natural Resources - Maryland Geological Survey activity and indicate general existing conditions. As such - they are only valid for the intended use - content - time - and accuracy specification. The user is responsible for the results of any application of the data for other than their intended purpose. The Department of Natural Resources - Maryland Geological Survey makes no warranty - expressed or implied - as to the use or appropriateness of the data - and there are no warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose of use. The Maryland Geological Survey makes no representation to the accuracy or completeness of the data and may not be held liable for human error or defect. Data should not be used at a scale greater than that. By using the data - you signify that you have read the use constraints and accept its terms. Acknowledgment of the Maryland Geological Survey and credit to the originator(s)/author(s) are expected in products derived from this data. Bathymetric data reproduced from NOAA bathymetric database at http://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/ Last Updated: Feature Service Layer Link: http://geodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/Elevation/MD_Bathymetry/MapServer/4 ADDITIONAL LICENSE TERMS: The Spatial Data and the information therein (collectively "the Data") is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind either expressed implied or statutory. The user assumes the entire risk as to quality and performance of the Data. No guarantee of accuracy is granted nor is any responsibility for reliance thereon assumed. In no event shall the State of Maryland be liable for direct indirect incidental consequential or special damages of any kind. The State of Maryland does not accept liability for any damages or misrepresentation caused by inaccuracies in the Data or as a result to changes to the Data nor is there responsibility assumed to maintain the Data in any manner or form. The Data can be freely distributed as long as the metadata entry is not modified or deleted. Any data derived from the Data must acknowledge the State of Maryland in the metadata.

These data were automated to provide an accurate high-resolution historical shoreline of Wequetequock Cove and Fishers Island Sound, Connecticut and Rhode Island suitable as a geographic information system (GIS) data layer. These data are derived from shoreline maps that were produced by the NOAA National Ocean Service including its predecessor agencies which were based on an office interpre...

These data are appropriate for use in local and regional thematic analysis. The data are not appropriate as a geodetic, legal or engineering base. The data set was not and is not intended as a substitute for surveyed locations, such as can be determined by a registered Public Land Surveyor. Although useful in a GIS as a reference base layer for maps, the data set has no legal basis in the definition of boundaries or property lines.

Data Set Overview In total 2304 images were returned on encounter night between 20:54 and 00:03 UT. Of these images, a total of 2017 are present in the data set submitted to IHW. Images taken in photometer mode have not been submitted. These data were obtained by using the spin of the spacecraft to scan the sky while the CCD remained unclocked. They therefore have one dimensional spatial information but each pixel contains the integrated intensity from some portion (depending upon the exposure time) of an annulus on the sky. These data would be useful for this purpose (particularly when taken through the narrowband filters because of the significantly higher exposure time) were it not for the stray light entering the optics of the camera when HMC was on the sunward side of the spacecraft. No effort has been made to reduce this data and its scientific usefulness is assumed to be negligible. The last three image sets returned in multidetector mode (MDM) immediately prior to the power disturbance which terminated operations before closest approach are also excluded. Image set 3504 does contain useful data but is corrupted and requires manual reduction. This task has not been completed at this time. Image sets 3505 and 3506 are also corrupted and probably do not contain useful image data. Seven images taken at the beginning of the encounter sequence (image ids 674 to 680) were not correctly converted by the telemetry conversion routine. These images are not currently in the HMC database system and are therefore not included in the IHW data set. The similarity between these data and the subsequent data probably ensures that, for scientific evaluation of HMC data, their omission is of little or no importance. One image (3142) has been omitted because it does not have an associated header. Available data The total numbers of images taken in each superpixel format (SPF) in the IHW data set are shown in Ta truncated!, Please [truncated!, Please see actual data for full text]

All states (including the District of Columbia) provide data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) on a range of Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) eligibility and enrollment metrics. These data reflect state-reported information on Medicaid and CHIP eligibility renewals initiated and scheduled for completion during the reporting period. In addition to reporting the outcomes of renewals at the end of each reporting period, states also provide an update on renewals that were reported pending as of the end of a reporting period. For more information on these data, see Sections II and III of the Eligibility Processing Data Report specifications.
Notes:
Georgia reported data for individuals who continue to be eligible following a change in circumstances and were granted a new 12-month eligibility period during the reporting period, along with data on individuals due for renewal in the month.
North Carolina reports renewal outcomes for only initiated renewals scheduled for completion in the report month, and as such, the data do not reflect renewals that should have been completed in the reporting period that the state was unable to initiate by the end of the report month.