As of the fourth quarter of 2024, Meta's Threads had approximately 275 million monthly active users (MAU), up from 200 million MAU in the third quarter of 2024. Just 24 hours after the release of Threads in July 2023, 30 million people were using the new network from Meta Platforms.

Meta Platforms released a new social media platform called Threads on 5th July 2023, which is available in over 100 countries, excluding the European Union. Within two hours of its release, two million users had signed up for Threads, and within 24 hours, 30 million people were on the new online network. As of July 10th, the number of sign-ups reached 100 million. Users can post up to 500 characters on Threads, and the service offers numerous features that are comparable to those on Twitter and is verified via users' Instagram accounts.

Here is a breakdown of how quickly people signed up for Threads...

Time spent on Threads has dropped sharply since launch

As of July 21, 2023, Twitter - now rebranded into X - counted approximately 106 million users who interacted with the app daily on Android. In comparison, Meta's latest product Threads counted around 13 million users engaging with the app on a daily basis.

In this post, we will break down all of the latest Threads statistics and give you some insight into what the future looks like with Twitter vs Threads.

On 5th July 2023, Meta Platforms released Threads, a text-focused social media platform. Joining Meta's Family of Apps, Threads focuses on real-time conversations, giving users a similar experience to Twitter. Threads offers users 500 characters per post, in comparison to Twitter's 280 characters. However, for Twitter Blue subscribers, posts can be substantially longer. Threads users can also take advantage of longer video posts, and free verification through their Instagram accounts.

A bolt out of the (Twitter) blue

As the tech elite attempt to fill the Twitter-shaped hole that social media users are feeling since the platform’s recent changes, the company is offering users the chance to verify themselves on the platform. The famous blue check mark, once reserved for journalists, celebrities, and public figures, can be purchased for a monthly fee. As of April 2023, there 640 thousand people were subscribing to Twitter Blue, up from 290 thousand in February 2023.

Threads is off to a strong start

Creating a profile on Threads is easy for Meta product users who already have an Instagram account as the new and free-to-use platform is integrated into the widely used app. With around two billion monthly active users on Instagram, it is no surprise that Threads gained 30 million sign-ups within 24 hours of being launched. Although signing up for Threads is easy, quitting the platform is not so straightforward, as deleting a Threads account results in the deactivation of the linked Instagram account.

As of February 2025, almost 29 percent of Threads users were aged between 25 and 34 years. Additionally, 20.36 percent of users were between the aged of 18 and 24 years. Threads was released in the summer of 2023 and is the fastest mobile app to reach 150 million downloads.

The Threads, an Instagram App Reviews dataset is a comprehensive collection of user reviews from the Threads mobile app on Google Play Store & App Store, capturing valuable insights and sentiments. The dataset enables the understanding of user satisfaction, evaluation of app performance, and identification of emerging patterns.

The way data was collected Scraping Threads App reviews on Google Play Store & App Store

Ideas for using this dataset Sentiment analysis What makes the application receive 1-star and 5-star Note - It was last updated on July 26th 2023

Original Data Source: Threads, an Instagram app Reviews

Dataset from our ICWSM 2017 paper. When using this resource, please use the following citation:

Aragón P., Gómez V., Kaltenbrunner A. (2017) To Thread or Not to Thread: The Impact of Conversation Threading on Online Discussion, ICWSM-17- 11th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Montreal, Canada.

@inproceedings {aragon2017ICWSM, author = {Arag\'on, Pablo and G\'omez, Vicen\c{c} and Kaltenbrunner, Andreas}, title = {To Thread or Not to Thread: The Impact of Conversation Threading on Online Discussion}, booktitle = {ICWSM-17 - 11th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media}, publisher = {The AAAI Press}, location = {Montreal, Canada}, year = 2017 }

More info about this dataset can also be found at:

Aragón P., Gómez V., Kaltenbrunner A., (2017) Detecting Platform Effects in Online Discussions, Policy & Internet, 9, 2017.

@article{aragon2017PI, author = {Arag\'on, Pablo and G\'omez, Vicen\c{c} and Kaltenbrunner, Andreas}, title = {Detecting Platform Effects in Online Discussions}, journal = {Policy & Internet}, volume = {9}, number = {4}, pages = {420-443}, doi = {10.1002/poi3.158}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/poi3.158}, eprint = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/poi3.158}, year = {2017} }

Crawling process

We built a crawling process that collects all the stories in the front page of Meneame from 2011 to 2015 (both years included). We then performed a second crawling process to collect every comment from the discussion thread of each story. From both crawling processes, we obtained 72,005 stories and 5,385,324 comments.

It is important to highlight two issues taken into account when the crawler was designed. First, the machine-readable robots.txt file on Meneame does not disallow this process. Second, the footnote of Meneame indicates the licenses of the code, graphics and content of the website. The license for content is Attribution 3.0 Spain (CC BY 3.0 ES) which allows us to release this dataset.

Fields

Every discussion thread is stored in a JSON file named with the URL slug of the corresponding story in Meneame, located in a yyyy-mm-dd folder. The JSON file is an array of elements with the following fields:

id (string): ID of the story/comment

sent (timestamp): Date of the story/comment as yyyy-MM-ddThh:mm:ssZ.

message (string): Text of the story/comment

user (string): Username of the authoring story/comment

karma (number): Karma score of the comment when the crawling was performed

comments_count (number): Number of comments in reply to the story/post

votes (number): Number of votes to the story/comment

thread (string): URL of the thread

thread_id (string): Sequential arriving order to the thread (0 if story, >=1 if comment)

depth (string): Depth within the thread (0 if story, >=1 if comment)

url (string): URL of the specific story/comment

title (string): Title, only available for stories.

published (string): Date when published on the front page, only available for stories.

tags (string): Tags, only available for stories.

clics (string): Number of clicks, only available for stories.

users (string): Number of user votes, only available for stories.

anonymous (string): Number of anonymous votes, only available for stories.

negatives (string): Number of negative votes, only available for stories.

in_reply_to_id (string): ID of the parent story/comment, only available for comments.

in_reply_to_user (string): Authoring user of the parent story/comment, only available for comments.

in_reply_to_thread_id (string): Sequential arriving order to the thread of of the parent story/comment, only available for comments.

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under the María de Maeztu Units of Excellence Programme (MDM-2015-0502).

As of August 2024, the average users spent around 34 minutes per month on the Threads app. Overall, the app had a daily open rate of around 24 percent, and an average number of 20 sessions per month.

Vietnam Industrial Production: HCMC: Threads data was reported at 14,124.000 Ton in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 12,725.000 Ton for 2015. Vietnam Industrial Production: HCMC: Threads data is updated yearly, averaging 8,398.000 Ton from Dec 2009 (Median) to 2016, with 8 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 14,124.000 Ton in 2016 and a record low of 3,363.000 Ton in 2012. Vietnam Industrial Production: HCMC: Threads data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Ho Chi Minh City Statistics Office. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Vietnam – Table VN.B037: Industrial Production: in Quantity: Ho Chi Minh City .

According to a survey among Vietnamese internet users conducted by Decision Lab, in the third quarter of 2024, 12 percent of respondents reported using Threads. In the same quarter, Facebook was the most used social network among surveyed respondents in Vietnam, followed by Zalo - a Vietnamese social messaging platform.

r/italy is a subreddit focused on discussions related to Italy, including news, culture, politics, and society. Users can post and comment on various topics related to Italy, including travel, language, cuisine, and more. Among the many threads that populate the subreddit, one of the most popular is the daily thread named "Caffè Italia." As the name suggests, this thread is a virtual coffeehouse where users can gather and exchange ideas on a variety of topics.

Every day, a new "Caffè Italia" thread is created, and users are encouraged to participate by sharing their opinions, asking for advice, or simply chatting with others. The topics discussed in this thread can be very diverse, ranging from Italian cuisine and travel to politics, news, and social issues.

The "Caffè Italia" thread provides an informal and friendly space where users can express themselves freely and connect with others who share their interests or concerns. It's a place where they can ask for recommendations on the best places to visit in Italy, share their thoughts on the latest news or events, or discuss cultural topics, such as literature, art, or music.

What makes the "Caffè Italia" thread so unique is its sense of community. Users feel welcome and valued, and they often return to the thread to catch up with the latest discussions or to contribute to ongoing conversations. Many users have formed friendships and connections through the thread, which has become a hub for the r/italy community.

In summary, the "Caffè Italia" thread is a daily gathering place for r/italy users to engage in conversations, share their experiences, and connect with others. Whether you're a first-time visitor to the subreddit or a seasoned member of the community, you're sure to find something interesting and engaging in the "Caffè Italia" thread.

This dataset contains several months of data scraped from it. The code used to generate it is available in my Github profile.

Context When Twitter introduced its thread functionality, a debate emerged: "If you're gonna write a f*ck ton of tweets at once, why not write a blog post instead of cluttering my feed?"… "It's easier and user-friendlier to share ideas in a single app"…

I'm not getting into that debate. Both blog posts and Twitter threads have their own advantages.

But I noticed a phenomenon while reading threads on Twitter: the engagement—retweets, likes and replies—drops with each subsequent tweet!

Now, this has some logical explanations. Like, people don't want to retweet or like every tweet in a thread, because that'd be annoying. But this trend kept appearing in every single thread I read.

It was bugging me, so I had to gather some data.

Content The dataset is divided into five parts:

five_ten.csv: data of threads 5-10 tweets long ten_fifteen.csv: data of threads 10-15 tweets long fifteen_twenty.csv: data of threads 15-20 tweets long twenty_twentyfive.csv: data of threads 20-25 tweets long twentyfive_thirty.csv: data of threads 25-30 tweets long They all contain the same data:

id: Tweet ID (maybe I should remove it to anonymize the data?) thread_number: Thread identifier, used for grouping each thread and its tweets timestamp: Creation date of each tweet text: The content of each tweet retweets: Retweet count for each tweet likes: Like count for each tweet replies: Reply count for each tweet Each "bin" contains around 100 threads… so in total there are ~500 threads.

Acknowledgements The threads were manually gathered using Thread Reader (both the web page and the bot).

Disclaimer The content of the threads/tweets did not had any influence in choosing a thread or not. The only parameter was the length of the thread (5-30 tweets tops). The tweets collected date from October 2017 to May 2018.

Inspiration Some things I noticed while gathering the data was that political threads have a steadier engagement than, say, art threads. So context might influence thread engagement, and it'd be interesting to do some NLP to figure that out.

Also it'd be cool to find a "formula" for better engagement in Twitter threads, like how long should a thread be? or maybe a probability of engagement based on the success of the initial tweet?

Finally, this whole issue reminds me of the headline problem: most people don't go beyond the headline. Maybe Twitter threads suffer from that too.

License

CC0

Original Data Source: Twitter Threads

You might be surprised how much Truth Social is worth based on its small number of users.

In March 2025, Threads generated around 18 million downloads worldwide. Meta Platforms released its X competitor Threads in July 2023. The app generated about 72 million app downloads within the first month of release. The text-based social platform was initially launched in 100 countries but was notable absent in the EU due to data protection regulations. On December 14, 2023, Threads was finally launched in the EU.

We've put together a list of the latest Truth Social statistics so you can see who uses the platform and whether or not Truth Social is likely to become a dominant social media network in the future.

Cosmetic Threads Market Outlook

The global cosmetic threads market size was valued at approximately USD 500 million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 1.2 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.5%. The robust growth of this market can be attributed to the increasing demand for minimally invasive aesthetic procedures across the globe. As more individuals seek out less invasive options for cosmetic enhancement with shorter recovery times, the appeal of cosmetic threads has surged dramatically. This trend is driven not only by technological advancements in thread materials and techniques but also by a growing consumer base that is increasingly aware of and interested in aesthetic procedures that promise natural-looking results without the need for surgery.

One of the key growth factors in the cosmetic threads market is the rising awareness and acceptance of aesthetic procedures among the aging population. With an increasing number of people seeking ways to maintain a youthful appearance, cosmetic threads offer an attractive solution. They provide a non-surgical means to lift and tighten sagging skin, which is particularly appealing to those hesitant about traditional surgical facelifts. Additionally, the social stigmas surrounding cosmetic procedures are diminishing, as these treatments become more commonplace and publicly endorsed by celebrities and influencers. This shift in societal attitudes is encouraging more people to explore cosmetic enhancements, thereby driving the market forward.

Technological advancements in the materials used for cosmetic threads are playing a critical role in market growth. Innovations in biocompatible materials such as polydioxanone (PDO), poly L-lactic acid (PLLA), and polycaprolactone (PCL) have enhanced the safety and efficacy of these procedures. These materials are not only safer for patients but also provide better aesthetic outcomes by encouraging collagen production in the skin. The development of new thread designs, such as barbed or cog threads, has further improved the results of thread lifts, making them an increasingly popular option for various cosmetic applications. As manufacturers continue to innovate, the market is expected to witness a further increase in demand.

Another significant factor contributing to the growth of the cosmetic threads market is the increasing availability of these procedures across a wider range of healthcare settings. Specialty clinics and aesthetic centers are becoming more accessible, with many offering competitive pricing and personalized treatment plans. The rise of medical tourism, particularly in regions such as Asia Pacific and Latin America, is also contributing to market expansion. Patients are traveling to these regions from countries with higher healthcare costs, seeking affordable yet high-quality cosmetic treatments. This trend is not only boosting the demand for cosmetic threads but also fostering the global growth of the market.

The introduction of Facial Implant Thread technology has further broadened the scope of cosmetic thread applications. These threads are designed to provide enhanced structural support and contouring, making them particularly effective for facial rejuvenation. Unlike traditional threads, Facial Implant Threads are crafted to integrate seamlessly with facial tissues, offering a more pronounced lift and longer-lasting results. This innovation is especially appealing to individuals seeking significant aesthetic improvements without resorting to invasive surgery. As the technology behind Facial Implant Threads continues to evolve, it is expected to play a pivotal role in the future of non-surgical facial enhancements, attracting a growing number of consumers who prioritize both effectiveness and safety in their cosmetic procedures.

Product Type Analysis

The product type segment of the cosmetic threads market is categorized into barb threads, screw threads, cog threads, and others. Barb threads are among the most commonly used due to their ability to provide a strong, secure lift with minimal invasiveness. These threads have tiny barbs along their length, which catch onto the tissue, providing the lift and supporting the sagging skin. Barb threads are particularly popular for facelifting procedures, as they offer a natural-looking result with a relatively quick recovery time. The demand for barb threads is expected to grow significantly as they continue to be preferred by practitioners for their effectiveness and ease of use.

Lifting Thread Devices Market Outlook

The lifting thread devices market size was valued at approximately USD 457 million in 2023 and is anticipated to reach around USD 1.1 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.2%. This growth is primarily driven by the increasing demand for minimally invasive cosmetic procedures globally.

The significant growth of the lifting thread devices market can be attributed to the rising awareness and acceptance of minimally invasive procedures among the aging population. As individuals seek to maintain a youthful appearance without undergoing extensive surgical interventions, the demand for thread lifting procedures has surged. This trend is further bolstered by advancements in thread technology, which have made these procedures safer, more effective, and longer-lasting. Additionally, the reduced downtime and lower risk of complications associated with lifting thread procedures compared to traditional surgical facelifts make them an attractive option for many.

Another key driver for the market's expansion is the increasing disposable income and willingness to spend on aesthetic enhancements. With a growing middle-class population in developing regions, more individuals can afford cosmetic procedures that were once considered luxury services. Furthermore, the influence of social media and celebrity endorsements has significantly contributed to the acceptance and desirability of aesthetic treatments, including lifting thread devices. These factors collectively create a favorable environment for market growth.

Technological advancements in the field of lifting thread devices have also played a crucial role in market expansion. Innovations such as absorbable threads and improved biocompatibility have enhanced the safety and efficacy of these procedures. Furthermore, the development of threads with better tensile strength and anchoring capabilities has improved the outcomes, making thread lifts a viable alternative to more invasive surgical procedures. Medical device manufacturers are continuously investing in research and development to create more advanced and user-friendly products, further driving market growth.

The demand for Female Face Lift procedures using lifting thread devices is particularly noteworthy. As women increasingly seek non-surgical options to rejuvenate their appearance, thread lifts provide an effective solution with minimal downtime. This procedure is gaining traction among females who wish to achieve a youthful look without the risks associated with traditional surgical facelifts. The ability of thread lifts to offer immediate results while promoting natural collagen production makes them an attractive choice for many. The growing popularity of Female Face Lift procedures is expected to significantly contribute to the overall growth of the lifting thread devices market.

From a regional perspective, North America currently holds the largest market share, driven by high consumer demand for cosmetic procedures and the presence of well-established healthcare infrastructure. However, the Asia Pacific region is expected to experience the highest growth rate during the forecast period. This surge is due to the increasing disposable income, growing urbanization, and rising awareness and acceptance of aesthetic procedures in countries like China, India, and South Korea. Additionally, medical tourism in these countries is on the rise, attracting patients from around the world seeking affordable and high-quality cosmetic treatments.

Product Type Analysis

The product type segment in the lifting thread devices market is categorized into barbed threads, smooth threads, and others. Barbed threads are one of the most popular types used in lifting procedures due to their superior anchoring capabilities. These threads have tiny barbs that grip the underlying tissues, providing a lifting effect and promoting collagen production. The demand for barbed threads is driven by their effectiveness in achieving immediate and long-lasting results. Medical practitioners prefer barbed threads for various lifting procedures, including facelifts and body contouring, due to their enhanced ability to hold tissues in place.

Smooth threads, on the other hand, are gaining traction for their less invasive nature and suitability for a broader range of patients. Unlike barbed threads, smooth threads do not have barbs but are instead used to stimulate collagen