Other non 3 waters utility layers within Gisborne District Council. Includes electricity transmission lines, gas lines and state highways.

Stormwater Pipe/Conveyance Lines in Fuquay-Varina. Please note that many of the stormwater line features represent privately owned and maintained pipes, and these are essential for mapping and understanding the stormwater drainage network sub-systems at the neighborhood level. Please pay attention to the Subtype field to identify the different categories of public vs. private and culvert type stormwater lines. Directionality (start vs. end vertices) of these line features reflects real world flow direction. The GIS data in the area of Downtown Fuquay-Varina has a lot of old and erroneous stormwater features. A project is currently underway to correct much of this inaccurate stormwater data. Please note that ALL public utility data layers can be downloaded in a single .mpkx (ArcGIS Pro map package file), updated every Friday evening. This .mpkx file can be opened directly with ArcGIS Pro version 3+. Alternatively, you can extract the file geodatabase within it by renaming the file ending .mpkx to .zip and treating it like a zip archive file, for use in any version of ArcGIS Pro or ArcMap software. You can also use QGIS, a powerful, free, and open-source GIS software.The Town of Fuquay-Varina creates, maintains, and serves out a variety of utility information to the public, including its Potable Water System, Sanitary Sewer System, and Stormwater Collection System features. This is the same utility data displayed in our public web map. This utility data includes some features designated as 'private' that are not owned or maintained by the Town, but may be helpful for modeling and other informational purposes. Please pay particular attention to the terms of use and disclaimer associated with these data. Some data includes the use of Subtypes and Domains that may not translate well to Shapefile or GeoJSON downloads available through our Open Data site. Please beware the dangers of cartographic misrepresentation if you are unfamiliar with filtering and symbolizing data based on attributes. Water System Layers:Water LinesWater ValvesWater ManholesFire HydrantsFire Department ConnectionsWater MetersWater Meter VaultsRPZ (Backflow Preventers)Water TankWater Booster StationsHarnett County Water District AreaSewer System Layers:Gravity Sewer LinesForced Sewer LinesSewer ManholesSewer ValvesSewer CleanoutsSewer Pump StationsWastewater Treatment PlantsStormwater System Layers:Stormwater Lines (Pipes)Stormwater Points (Inlets/Outlets/Manholes)Stormwater Control Measure Points (SCM's, such as Wet Ponds / Retention Basins)

While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.The Council does not guarantee the existence of laterals (service lines) to vacant lots, regardless of whether a lateral (service line) is shown or not.If you are planning on undertaking any excavation work, please request service plans via beforeUdig to ensure you receive all the required information.Read full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata and 3 Waters Asset Information Metadata Standard.AbstractThis dataset displays water supply service line assets within the Waimakariri District (WDC) area. This data is collected to support the maintenance and management of WDC's water supply network. This layer includes fields that classify, e.g., material, length, diameter etc.For other water supply pipe assets, please refer to the other water pipe datasets: Network Mains & Facility Pipes and Water Pipes Other.A Pipe, in general terms, represents a group of asset types that can be categorised by the following definition – ‘A man-made, hollow tube used for the transmission of water’.Pipes can be used for a variety of purposes including:- Delivering potable water to network users- Conveying stormwater and wastewater to treatment facilities and outfalls- Ducting used to enclose pipes or other linear assetPipe asset types include conduit, ventilation pipe, culvert, facility pipe, manifold, network main, service line, subsoil drain and tunnel.Service Line: a reticulation pipe that forms the connection between a private property utility pipe and the Council reticulation network. The demarcation point is usually the service connection box for a potable water supply or the property boundary for a sewer or stormwater connection.Please refer to the 3 Waters Asset Information Metadata Standard Data Standard for further information.Update FrequencyDailyPoint of ContactWaimakariri District CouncilLineageData has been compiled from a number of sources and its accuracy may vary (e.g. Field Verification, Deposited Plans, AsBuilt plans and forms, sketches, aerial photo, Google Street View). Attribute information is stored in Waimakariri District Council's Asset Management System. This is joined to a spatial dataset containing the location of each asset and published as a GIS feature layer for use within WDC GIS applications, Before U Dig, and open data portal. There may be delays before data is updated to reflect changes in an area.

Water Meter points within Fuquay-Varina. Most meter devices are owned and maintained by the Town, which provides water utility services. However, on some commercial sites, for example, the meter box and meter yoke are actually privately owned and maintained while the meter device is owned and maintained by the Town. This water meter dataset is constantly under development and improvement as there is increasing demand to integrate GIS meter information with other solutions. Please note that some meter points are not field-validated and some are not associated with a valid METERID for water service, and may essentially be duplicated legacy locations from old GIS data. Please note that ALL public utility data layers can be downloaded in a single .mpkx (ArcGIS Pro map package file), updated every Friday evening. This .mpkx file can be opened directly with ArcGIS Pro version 3+. Alternatively, you can extract the file geodatabase within it by renaming the file ending .mpkx to .zip and treating it like a zip archive file, for use in any version of ArcGIS Pro or ArcMap software. You can also use QGIS, a powerful, free, and open-source GIS software.The Town of Fuquay-Varina creates, maintains, and serves out a variety of utility information to the public, including its Potable Water System, Sanitary Sewer System, and Stormwater Collection System features. This is the same utility data displayed in our public web map. This utility data includes some features designated as 'private' that are not owned or maintained by the Town, but may be helpful for modeling and other informational purposes. Please pay particular attention to the terms of use and disclaimer associated with these data. Some data includes the use of Subtypes and Domains that may not translate well to Shapefile or GeoJSON downloads available through our Open Data site. Please beware the dangers of cartographic misrepresentation if you are unfamiliar with filtering and symbolizing data based on attributes. Water System Layers:Water LinesWater ValvesWater ManholesFire HydrantsFire Department ConnectionsWater MetersRPZ (Backflow Preventers)Water TankWater Booster StationsHarnett County Water District AreaSewer System Layers:Gravity Sewer LinesForced Sewer LinesSewer ManholesSewer ValvesSewer CleanoutsSewer Pump StationsWastewater Treatment PlantsStormwater System Layers:Stormwater Lines (Pipes)Stormwater Points (Inlets/Outlets/Manholes)Stormwater Control Measure Points (SCM's, such as Wet Ponds / Retention Basins)

These Surface Water Supply Protection Areas delineate those areas included in 310 CMR 22.00, the Massachusetts Drinking Water Regulations, as Surface Water Supply Protection Zones:

• ZONEA: represents a) the land area between the surface water source and the upper boundary of the bank; b) the land area within a 400 foot lateral distance from the upper boundary of the bank of a Class A surface water source, as defined in 314 CMR 4.05(3)(a); and c) the land area within a 200 foot lateral distance from the upper boundary of the bank of a tributary or associated surface water body.

• ZONEB: represents the land area within one-half mile of the upper boundary of the bank of a Class A surface water source, as defined in 314 CMR 4.05(3)(a), or edge of watershed, whichever is less. Zone B always includes the land area within a 400 ft lateral distance from the upper boundary of the bank of a Class A surface water source.

• ZONEC: represents the land area not designated as Zone A or B within the watershed of a Class A surface water source, as defined in 314 CMR 4.05(3)(a). More details...Map service also available.

Water Lines (pipes) within Fuquay-Varina. This is a rather extensive collection of a number of sub-types of water lines, and includes both public and privately owned features. Mainly, there are public water mains, public hydrants legs, private hydrant/fire legs, and private mains/service lines. Water service lines (i.e. service legs from mains to meters) maintained by the Town are only recently being mapped in our GIS system and are limited. When using this data, please pay close attention to WLine_Subtype and OWNEDBY fields. Please note that ALL public utility data layers can be downloaded in a single .mpkx (ArcGIS Pro map package file), updated every Friday evening. This .mpkx file can be opened directly with ArcGIS Pro version 3+. Alternatively, you can extract the file geodatabase within it by renaming the file ending .mpkx to .zip and treating it like a zip archive file, for use in any version of ArcGIS Pro or ArcMap software. You can also use QGIS, a powerful, free, and open-source GIS software.The Town of Fuquay-Varina creates, maintains, and serves out a variety of utility information to the public, including its Potable Water System, Sanitary Sewer System, and Stormwater Collection System features. This is the same utility data displayed in our public web map. This utility data includes some features designated as 'private' that are not owned or maintained by the Town, but may be helpful for modeling and other informational purposes. Please pay particular attention to the terms of use and disclaimer associated with these data. Some data includes the use of Subtypes and Domains that may not translate well to Shapefile or GeoJSON downloads available through our Open Data site. Please beware the dangers of cartographic misrepresentation if you are unfamiliar with filtering and symbolizing data based on attributes. Water System Layers:Water LinesWater ValvesWater ManholesFire HydrantsFire Department ConnectionsWater MetersRPZ (Backflow Preventers)Water TankWater Booster StationsHarnett County Water District AreaSewer System Layers:Gravity Sewer LinesForced Sewer LinesSewer ManholesSewer ValvesSewer CleanoutsSewer Pump StationsWastewater Treatment PlantsStormwater System Layers:Stormwater Lines (Pipes)Stormwater Points (Inlets/Outlets/Manholes)Stormwater Control Measure Points (SCM's, such as Wet Ponds / Retention Basins)

In 2012, the CPUC ordered the development of a statewide map that is designed specifically for the purpose of identifying areas where there is an increased risk for utility associated wildfires. The development of the CPUC -sponsored fire-threat map, herein "CPUC Fire-Threat Map," started in R.08-11-005 and continued in R.15-05-006.

A multistep process was used to develop the statewide CPUC Fire-Threat Map. The first step was to develop Fire Map 1 (FM 1), an agnostic map which depicts areas of California where there is an elevated hazard for the ignition and rapid spread of powerline fires due to strong winds, abundant dry vegetation, and other environmental conditions. These are the environmental conditions associated with the catastrophic powerline fires that burned 334 square miles of Southern California in October 2007. FM 1 was developed by CAL FIRE and adopted by the CPUC in Decision 16-05-036.

FM 1 served as the foundation for the development of the final CPUC Fire-Threat Map. The CPUC Fire-Threat Map delineates, in part, the boundaries of a new High Fire-Threat District (HFTD) where utility infrastructure and operations will be subject to stricter fire‑safety regulations. Importantly, the CPUC Fire-Threat Map (1) incorporates the fire hazards associated with historical powerline wildfires besides the October 2007 fires in Southern California (e.g., the Butte Fire that burned 71,000 acres in Amador and Calaveras Counties in September 2015), and (2) ranks fire-threat areas based on the risks that utility-associated wildfires pose to people and property.

Primary responsibility for the development of the CPUC Fire-Threat Map was delegated to a group of utility mapping experts known as the Peer Development Panel (PDP), with oversight from a team of independent experts known as the Independent Review Team (IRT). The members of the IRT were selected by CAL FIRE and CAL FIRE served as the Chair of the IRT. The development of CPUC Fire-Threat Map includes input from many stakeholders, including investor-owned and publicly owned electric utilities, communications infrastructure providers, public interest groups, and local public safety agencies.

The PDP served a draft statewide CPUC Fire-Threat Map on July 31, 2017, which was subsequently reviewed by the IRT. On October 2 and October 5, 2017, the PDP filed an Initial CPUC Fire-Threat Map that reflected the results of the IRT's review through September 25, 2017. The final IRT-approved CPUC Fire-Threat Map was filed on November 17, 2017. On November 21, 2017, SED filed on behalf of the IRT a summary report detailing the production of the CPUC Fire-Threat Map(referenced at the time as Fire Map 2). Interested parties were provided opportunity to submit alternate maps, written comments on the IRT-approved map and alternate maps (if any), and motions for Evidentiary Hearings. No motions for Evidentiary Hearings or alternate map proposals were received. As such, on January 19, 2018 the CPUC adopted, via Safety and Enforcement Division's (SED) disposition of a Tier 1 Advice Letter, the final CPUC Fire-Threat Map.

Additional information can be found here.

Underground Utilities Mapping Services Market Outlook

The global underground utilities mapping services market size was valued at approximately USD 1.5 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 3.3 billion by 2032, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 9.1% during the forecast period. The surge in market size is fueled by increasing urbanization, infrastructure development, and the necessity for accurate subsurface data to avoid potential construction hazards. The expansion of smart city initiatives and the adoption of advanced technologies in utility mapping are also contributing significantly to market growth.

A critical factor driving the growth of the underground utilities mapping services market is the escalating demand for efficient infrastructure development across the globe. As urbanization continues to accelerate, cities are expanding, necessitating the construction of new roads, buildings, and public utilities. To ensure the longevity and safety of these structures, accurate mapping of underground utilities becomes imperative. This demand is further bolstered by government regulations mandating the safe excavation of sites to prevent damage to existing utilities. The integration of advanced technologies such as Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Building Information Modeling (BIM) in utility mapping processes is further enhancing the precision and efficiency of these services, thereby driving market growth.

Another significant growth factor is the increasing awareness about the environmental impact of construction activities and the subsequent need for sustainable practices. The mapping of underground utilities aids in minimizing the environmental footprint of construction projects by ensuring that existing utilities are not disrupted during excavation activities. This not only prevents potential service interruptions but also reduces the risk of hazardous spills or leaks that could contaminate the surrounding environment. Moreover, as businesses and government entities aim to implement more eco-friendly practices, the adoption of underground utilities mapping services is expected to rise, contributing to market growth.

Technological advancements in detection and mapping techniques represent another driver of market expansion. The introduction of sophisticated tools and methodologies, such as Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), Electromagnetic Location, and Acoustic Location technologies, has enhanced the ability to detect and map utilities with greater accuracy and depth. These innovations are particularly beneficial in complex urban areas where multiple utilities often coexist in close proximity. The continuous evolution of these technologies not only improves the efficiency of mapping services but also reduces the time and costs associated with excavation projects, further propelling market growth.

Regionally, North America currently dominates the underground utilities mapping services market, driven by substantial investments in infrastructure development and the implementation of stringent safety regulations. The United States, in particular, is a major contributor due to its extensive network of utilities and the growing emphasis on modernizing aging infrastructure. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to exhibit the highest growth rate during the forecast period, attributed to rapid urbanization, increasing infrastructural projects, and government initiatives focused on improving utility services. Countries such as China and India are at the forefront of this growth, enhancing the overall prospects of the market in the region.

Service Type Analysis

The underground utilities mapping services market is segmented by service type, including Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), Electromagnetic Location, Acoustic Location, and other emerging technologies. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is a widely used technology in this market segment due to its high precision and ability to detect non-metallic utilities. GPR offers the advantage of providing a three-dimensional image of the subsurface, allowing for accurate mapping of utilities with varying depths and compositions. The increasing demand for non-invasive and reliable mapping solutions in urban development projects is expected to continue driving the growth of GPR in the market.

Electromagnetic Location techniques are also gaining traction in the underground utilities mapping services market. This method is particularly effective for identifying metallic utilities such as pipes and cables. Electromagnetic Location is favored for its cost-effectiveness and speed in large

This is the 2022 version of the Aquifer Risk Map. The 2021 version of the Aquifer Risk Map is available here.This aquifer risk map is developed to fulfill requirements of SB-200 and is intended to help prioritize areas where domestic wells and state small water systems may be accessing raw source groundwater that does not meet primary drinking water standards (maximum contaminant level or MCL). In accordance with SB-200, the risk map is to be made available to the public and is to be updated annually starting January 1, 2021. The Fund Expenditure Plan states the risk map will be used by Water Boards staff to help prioritize areas for available SAFER funding. This is the final 2022 map based upon feedback received from the 2021 map. A summary of methodology updates to the 2022 map can be found here.This map displays raw source groundwater quality risk per square mile section. The water quality data is based on depth-filtered, declustered water quality results from public and domestic supply wells. The process used to create this map is described in the 2022 Aquifer Risk Map Methodology document. Data processing scripts are available on GitHub. Download/export links are provided in this app under the Data Download widget.This draft version was last updated December 1, 2021. Water quality risk: This layer contains summarized water quality risk per square mile section and well point. The section water quality risk is determined by analyzing the long-tern (20-year) section average and the maximum recent (within 5 years) result for all sampled contaminants. These values are compared to the MCL and sections with values above the MCL are “high risk”, sections with values within 80%-100% of the MCL are “medium risk” and sections with values below 80% of the MCL are “low risk”. The specific contaminants above or close to the MCL are listed as well. The water quality data is based on depth-filtered, de-clustered water quality results from public and domestic supply wells.Individual contaminants: This layer shows de-clustered water quality data for arsenic, nitrate, 1,2,3-trichloropropane, uranium, and hexavalent chromium per square mile section. Domestic Well Density: This layer shows the count of domestic well records per square mile. The domestic well density per square mile is based on well completion report data from the Department of Water Resources Online System for Well Completion Reports, with records drilled prior to 1970 removed and records of “destruction” removed.State Small Water Systems: This layer displays point locations for state small water systems based on location data from the Division of Drinking Water.Public Water System Boundaries: This layer displays the approximate service boundaries for public water systems based on location data from the Division of Drinking Water.Reference layers: This layer contains several reference boundaries, including boundaries of CV-SALTS basins with their priority status, Groundwater Sustainability Agency boundaries, census block group boundaries, county boundaries, and groundwater unit boundaries. ArcGIS Web Application

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Sagamore Hill National Historic Site and Vicinity, New York is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (sahi_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (sahi_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (sahi_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (sahi_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (sahi_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (sahi_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the sahi_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (sahi_geology_metadata.txt or sahi_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:62,500 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 31.8 meters or 104.2 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

The Netherlands is the only country with a special service for water-state artography. This is due to the unique structure of the Dutch landscape. The fact that about half of our land is below sea level requires special management measures. The water state artography contributes to this with maps that provide an inventory of the water management infrastructure of the country.From around 1850 onwards, a systematic mapping of the Netherlands began. The first edition of the Water Management Map of the Netherlands 1:50.000 was published from 1865 (Ormeling & Kraak, 1993, p. 229). In principle, five editions of the water state map have been published. However, the number of editions varies considerably per map sheet. Of some chart sheets, only four editions have been published, from others six or even seven. In addition, there are already three editions of certain map sheets, while the second edition still had to be released from other map sheets. The sheet layout has also been modified several times, based on the Topographic Service.

In the description of the five editions, the separate map sheet was the starting point. This means that cards from the same year can appear in different editions.

This service replaces the previous 'Three Waters' service, which held the same data but with a slightly different layer structure. This service removes the separation of 'Abandoned' assets into their own layers and instead keeps asset classes together, with symbols differentiating their status where necessary. Removal of this separation was done primarily to enable offline/sync capabilities.

See full Data Guide here.Ground Water Classifications Polygon:

Ground Water Quality Classifications is a polygon feature-based layer compiled at 1:24,000 scale that includes water quality classification information for groundwaters for all areas of the State of Connecticut. Ground Waters means waters flowing through earth materials beneath the ground surface and the Ground Water Quality Classifications is a designation of the use of the ground waters. The Ground Water Quality Classifications is based primarily on the Adopted Water Quality Classifications Map sheets with information collected and compiled from 1986 to 1997 by major drainage basin. The maps were hand-drawn at 1:50,000-scale in ink on Mylar which had been underprinted with a USGS topographic map base. The digital layer includes ground water water quality classifications. It does not include water quality classifications for ground waters below surface waterbodies. Surface Water Quality Classifications are defined separately in a set of data layers comprised of line and polygon features. The Ground Water Quality Classifications and the Surface Water Quality Classifications are usually presented together as a depiction of water quality classifications in Connecticut. The Ground Water Quality Classes are GA, GAA, GAAs, GB and GC. Classes GAA and GA designate areas of existing or potential drinking water. All ground waters not otherwise classified are considered as Class GA. Class GAAs is for ground water that is tributary to a public water supply reservoir. Class GB is used where ground water is not suitable for drinking water. Class GC is used for assimilation of permitted discharges. Modified classes GA-Impaired, GAA-Impaired, GAA-Well-Impaired, GAA-Well and GA-NY are found in the data layer to categorize special cases of GA or GAA that may not be meeting the goal (impaired), surround public water supply wells (Well) or contribute to a public water supply watershed for another state (NY). There are three elements that make up the Water Quality Standards which is an important element in Connecticut's clean water program. The first of these is the Standards themselves. The Standards set an overall policy for management of water quality in accordance with the directive of Section 22a-426 of the Connecticut General Statutes. In simple terms the policies can be summarized by saying that the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection shall: Protect surface and ground waters from degradation, Segregate waters used for drinking from those that play a role in waste assimilation, Restore surface waters that have been used for waste assimilation to conditions suitable for fishing and swimming, Restore degraded ground water to protect existing and designated uses, Provide a framework for establishing priorities for pollution abatement and State funding for clean up, Adopt standards that promote the State's economy in harmony with the environment. The second element is the Criteria, the descriptive and numerical standards that describe the allowable parameters and goals for the various water quality classifications. The final element is the Classification Maps that show the Class assigned to each surface and groundwater resource throughout the State. These maps also show the goals for the water resources, and in that manner provide a blueprint and set of priorities for Connecticut's efforts to restore water quality. Although federal law requires adoption of Water Quality Standards for surface waters, Water Quality Standards for ground waters are not subject to federal review and approval. Connecticut's Standards recognize that surface and ground waters are interrelated and address the issue of competing use of ground waters for drinking and for waste water assimilation. These Standards specifically identify ground water quality goals, designated uses and those measures necessary for protection of public and private drinking water supplies; the principal use of Connecticut ground waters. These three elements comprise the Water Quality Standards and are adopted using the public participation procedures contained in Section 22a-426 of the Connecticut General Statutes. The Standards, Criteria and Maps are reviewed and revised roughly every three years. Any change is considered a revision requiring public participation. The public participation process consists of public meetings held at various locations around the State, notification of all chief elected officials, notice in the Connecticut Law Journal and a public hearing. The Classification Maps are the subject of separate public hearings which are held for the adoption of the map covering each major drainage basin in the State. The Water Quality Standards and Criteria documents are available on the DEEP website, www.ct.gov/deep. The Ground and Surface Water Quality Classifications do not represent conditions at any one particular point in time. During the conversion from a manually maintained to a digitally maintained statewide data layer the Housatonic River and Southwest Coastal Basins information was updated. The publication date of the digital data reflects the official adoption date of the most recent Water Quality Classifications. Within the data layer the adoption dates are: Housatonic and Southwest Basins - March 1999, Connecticut and South Central Basins - February 1993, Thames and Southeast Basins - December 1986. This data is updated.

Status: UPDATED occasionally using ArcMap Contact: Michael Liberti, Tucson Water, 520-837-2226, Michael.Liberti@tucsonaz.gov Intended Use: Primary data record of service area boundaries. Not intended for map display unless approved by data owner. Known errors/qualifications This is a rough approximation of the obligated areas served by Tucson Water and some errors may exist especially in those areas outside the City of Tucson limits. Does not include the non-potable service area boundaries. The non-potable water system includes all water types that have not been treated to potable standards: reclaimed water lines, raw CAP mains from the canal, secondary effluent piped from the County treatment plant to the Roger Road reclaimed plan, TARP water in the mains between the recovery wells and the treatment plant and the CAVSARP recovery wellfields. Boundaries may overlap other water company service area boundaries because their definition of the boundaries may vary.***SERVED = The parcel has a TW water meter and is consuming water.***OBLIGATED = Either 1) a vacant parcel inside the City of Tucson that does not have a TW meter, or 2) a vacant/abandoned parcel that has a meter, but is not consuming water. ***COMMITTED = a parcel outside the City of Tucson that 1) is in an area of intergovernmental contractual agreement (e.g. Dove Mountain/Continental Ranch...) 2) is a master planned development for which TW previously granted a service agreement (will have a corresponding GREENLINE feature) 3) is under 20 acres and is located adjacent to a delivery pipe and is served on three sides 4) a Tucson Unified School District parcel ***NOT OBLIGATED = Call Tucson Water Development Services for clarification. ALSO NOTE THAT PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OUTSIDE TUCSON ARE ALSO COMMITTED (NO PARCEL) So, a parcel can be committed by contract, by prior approval or by location Individuals that live outside Tucson who are not currently served by TW fall under #3. Unless directed otherwise by Tucson Water, by default any parcel outside the City of Tucson that does not have a Tucson Water meter will NOT be served unless they annex. Replaces ObligatedServiceArea feature class formerly maintained in VMDB. The name ObligatedServiceArea is still used, but now is just a filtered view of ServiceArea. September 2010 - loaded ServiceArea shapefile into EDITSDE geodatabase to be maintained as feature class instead of shapefile. Renamed to ServiceArea. ObligatedServiceArea becomes a view of the ServiceArea feature class. sdetable -o create_view -T OBLIGATEDSERVICEAREA -t SERVICEAREA -w "SA_TYPE in ('SERVED','OBLIGATED','COMMITTED')" -c "OBJECTID,SHAPE,SA_TYPE,SA_SUBTYPE,REC_DATE,INSTALLYEAR" -i sde:sqlserver:pw-sql2005 -D editsdeAugust 2010 - ObligatedServiceArea criteria is redefined based on decisions by Mayor and Council. New shapefile called ServiceArea becomes the data of record.10/10/2008 Bryn Enright Copy of most recent Obligated Service Area provided to John Regan from Pima County to post in the GIS Library and MapGuide site.10/10/2008 Bryn Enright Renamed the feature class from admin.ObligatedServiceArea to admin.ObligatedServiceAreaHistory. The most current area will be made available in a new database view called admin.ObligatedServiceArea.10/10/2008 Bryn Enright "Appended the most recent obligated service area created by Michael Liberti which was created by:1. Dissolving the current service area (req_SA_current.shp) with committed areas outside the city (dove mtn, larry's marana, diamond bell, corona de tucson...)2. Erased the city polygon (LIMJURIS) from the dissolve.3. Added the entire city polygon back in (i.e. obligated area) but then erased all of the ""water providers"" with CCNs ('56' water right)." In = req_SA_obligated.shp Out = ADMIN.ObligatedServiceAreaJune 2008 Bryn Enright Shapefile imported into Geodatabase (EMAPDB) In = Req_ServiceArea_v1.shp Out = ObligatedServiceAreaJune 2008 Michael Liberti Layer dissolved to show only 1 polygon for obligated area. In = ServiceArea_v1.shp Out = Req_ServiceArea_v1.shpJune 2008 Michael Liberti Layer updated with new services and existing remote services that were not previously included.February 2008 Michael Liberti Layer updated with new services for the 2008 Update to the Water Plan 2000-2050November 2004 Michael Liberti "Modified PCLIS WATERCOS as collection of PARCELS intersecting SERVICES by M Liberti. Layer created for use in the Water Plan 2000-2050" In=PCLIS WATERCOS Out=ServiceArea_v1.shp Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit. Massa enim nec dui nunc. Quis commodo odio aenean sed adipiscing diam donec adipiscing. Nulla pellentesque dignissim enim sit amet venenatis urna. Sit amet volutpat consequat mauris nunc congue nisi vitae. Fames ac turpis egestas maecenas pharetra convallis posuere morbi leo. Morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis. Eget lorem dolor sed viverra ipsum nunc. Id ornare arcu odio ut sem. Morbi leo urna molestie at elementum eu. In metus vulputate eu scelerisque. Lobortis mattis aliquam faucibus purus in massa tempor nec feugiat. Ut sem viverra aliquet eget sit amet tellus cras adipiscing. Lobortis mattis aliquam faucibus purus in massa tempor. Donec massa sapien faucibus et molestie ac feugiat. Et odio pellentesque diam volutpat commodo sed egestas egestas. Pharetra magna ac placerat vestibulum lectus. Fermentum leo vel orci porta non pulvinar neque laoreet suspendissePurposeLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown UsesLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Known ErrorsLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Data ContactLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Update FrequencyLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

In 2007, the California Ocean Protection Council initiated the California Seafloor Mapping Program (CSMP), designed to create a comprehensive seafloor map of high-resolution bathymetry, marine benthic habitats, and geology within California’s State Waters. The program supports a large number of coastal-zone- and ocean-management issues, including the California Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) (California Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2008), which requires information about the distribution of ecosystems as part of the design and proposal process for the establishment of Marine Protected Areas. A focus of CSMP is to map California’s State Waters with consistent methods at a consistent scale. The CSMP approach is to create highly detailed seafloor maps through collection, integration, interpretation, and visualization of swath sonar data (the undersea equivalent of satellite remote-sensing data in terrestrial mapping), acoustic backscatter, seafloor video, seafloor photography, high-resolution seismic-reflection profiles, and bottom-sediment sampling data. The map products display seafloor morphology and character, identify potential marine benthic habitats, and illustrate both the surficial seafloor geology and shallow (to about 100 m) subsurface geology. It is emphasized that the more interpretive habitat and geology data rely on the integration of multiple, new high-resolution datasets and that mapping at small scales would not be possible without such data. This approach and CSMP planning is based in part on recommendations of the Marine Mapping Planning Workshop (Kvitek and others, 2006), attended by coastal and marine managers and scientists from around the state. That workshop established geographic priorities for a coastal mapping project and identified the need for coverage of “lands” from the shore strand line (defined as Mean Higher High Water; MHHW) out to the 3-nautical-mile (5.6-km) limit of California’s State Waters. Unfortunately, surveying the zone from MHHW out to 10-m water depth is not consistently possible using ship-based surveying methods, owing to sea state (for example, waves, wind, or currents), kelp coverage, and shallow rock outcrops. Accordingly, some of the data presented in this series commonly do not cover the zone from the shore out to 10-m depth. This data is part of a series of online U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) publications, each of which includes several map sheets, some explanatory text, and a descriptive pamphlet. Each map sheet is published as a PDF file. Geographic information system (GIS) files that contain both ESRI ArcGIS raster grids (for example, bathymetry, seafloor character) and geotiffs (for example, shaded relief) are also included for each publication. For those who do not own the full suite of ESRI GIS and mapping software, the data can be read using ESRI ArcReader, a free viewer that is available at http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcreader/index.html (last accessed September 20, 2013). The California Seafloor Mapping Program is a collaborative venture between numerous different federal and state agencies, academia, and the private sector. CSMP partners include the California Coastal Conservancy, the California Ocean Protection Council, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the California Geological Survey, California State University at Monterey Bay’s Seafloor Mapping Lab, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Center for Habitat Studies, Fugro Pelagos, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, including National Ocean Service–Office of Coast Surveys, National Marine Sanctuaries, and National Marine Fisheries Service), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, the National Park Service, and the U.S. Geological Survey. These web services for the Santa Barbara Channel map area includes data layers that are associated to GIS and map sheets available from the USGS CSMP web page at https://res1walrusd-o-twrd-o-tusgsd-o-tgov.vcapture.xyz/mapping/csmp/index.html. Each published CSMP map area includes a data catalog of geographic information system (GIS) files; map sheets that contain explanatory text; and an associated descriptive pamphlet. This web service represents the available data layers for this map area. Data was combined from different sonar surveys to generate a comprehensive high-resolution bathymetry and acoustic-backscatter coverage of the map area. These data reveal a range of physiographic including exposed bedrock outcrops, large fields of sand waves, as well as many human impacts on the seafloor. To validate geological and biological interpretations of the sonar data, the U.S. Geological Survey towed a camera sled over specific offshore locations, collecting both video and photographic imagery; these “ground-truth” surveying data are available from the CSMP Video and Photograph Portal at https://res1doid-o-torg.vcapture.xyz/10.5066/F7J1015K. The “seafloor character” data layer shows classifications of the seafloor on the basis of depth, slope, rugosity (ruggedness), and backscatter intensity and which is further informed by the ground-truth-survey imagery. The “potential habitats” polygons are delineated on the basis of substrate type, geomorphology, seafloor process, or other attributes that may provide a habitat for a specific species or assemblage of organisms. Representative seismic-reflection profile data from the map area is also include and provides information on the subsurface stratigraphy and structure of the map area. The distribution and thickness of young sediment (deposited over the past about 21,000 years, during the most recent sea-level rise) is interpreted on the basis of the seismic-reflection data. The geologic polygons merge onshore geologic mapping (compiled from existing maps by the California Geological Survey) and new offshore geologic mapping that is based on integration of high-resolution bathymetry and backscatter imagery seafloor-sediment and rock samplesdigital camera and video imagery, and high-resolution seismic-reflection profiles. The information provided by the map sheets, pamphlet, and data catalog has a broad range of applications. High-resolution bathymetry, acoustic backscatter, ground-truth-surveying imagery, and habitat mapping all contribute to habitat characterization and ecosystem-based management by providing essential data for delineation of marine protected areas and ecosystem restoration. Many of the maps provide high-resolution baselines that will be critical for monitoring environmental change associated with climate change, coastal development, or other forcings. High-resolution bathymetry is a critical component for modeling coastal flooding caused by storms and tsunamis, as well as inundation associated with longer term sea-level rise. Seismic-reflection and bathymetric data help characterize earthquake and tsunami sources, critical for natural-hazard assessments of coastal zones. Information on sediment distribution and thickness is essential to the understanding of local and regional sediment transport, as well as the development of regional sediment-management plans. In addition, siting of any new offshore infrastructure (for example, pipelines, cables, or renewable-energy facilities) will depend on high-resolution mapping. Finally, this mapping will both stimulate and enable new scientific research and also raise public awareness of, and education about, coastal environments and issues. Web services were created using an ArcGIS service definition file. The ArcGIS REST service and OGC WMS service include all Santa Barbara Channel map area data layers. Data layers are symbolized as shown on the associated map sheets.

Last Revised: February 2016

Map Information

This nowCOAST™ time-enabled map service provides maps depicting the latest global forecast guidance of water currents, water temperature, and salinity at forecast projections: 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96-hours from the NWS/NCEP Global Real-Time Ocean Forecast System (GRTOFS). The surface water currents velocity maps display the direction using white or black streaklets. The magnitude of the current is indicated by the length and width of the streaklet. The maps of the GRTOFS surface forecast guidance are updated on the nowCOAST™ map service once per day. For more detailed information about layer update frequency and timing, please reference the
nowCOAST™ Dataset Update Schedule.

Background Information

GRTOFS is based on the Hybrid Coordinates Ocean Model (HYCOM), an eddy resolving, hybrid coordinate numerical ocean prediction model. GRTOFS has global coverge and a horizontal resolution of 1/12 degree and 32 hybrid vertical layers. It has one forecast cycle per day (i.e. 0000 UTC) which generates forecast guidance out to 144 hours (6 days). However, nowCOAST™ only provides guidance out to 96 hours (4 days). The forecast cycle uses 3-hourly momentum and radiation fluxes along with precipitation predictions from the NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS). Each forecast cycle is preceded with a 48-hr long nowcast cycle. The nowcast cycle uses daily initial 3-D fields from the NAVOCEANO operational HYCOM-based forecast system which assimilates situ profiles of temperature and salinity from a variety of sources and remotely sensed SST, SSH and sea-ice concentrations. GRTOFS was developed by NCEP/EMC/Marine Modeling and Analysis Branch. GRTOFS is run once per day (0000 UTC forecast cycle) on the NOAA Weather and Climate Operational Supercomputer System (WCOSS) operated by NWS/NCEP Central Operations.

The maps are generated using a visualization technique developed by the Data Visualization Research Lab at The University of New Hampshire's Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping (http://www.ccom.unh.edu/vislab/). The method combines two techniques. First, equally spaced streamlines are computed in the flow field using Jobard and Lefer's (1977) algorithm. Second, a series of "streaklets" are rendered head to tail along each streamline to show the direction of flow. Each of these varies along its length in size, color and transparency using a method developed by Fowler and Ware (1989), and later refined by Mr. Pete Mitchell and Dr. Colin Ware (Mitchell, 2007).

Time Information

This map service is time-enabled, meaning that each individual layer contains time-varying data and can be utilized by clients capable of making map requests that include a time component.

In addition to ArcGIS Server REST access, time-enabled OGC WMS 1.3.0 access is also provided by this service.

This particular service can be queried with or without the use of a time component. If the time parameter is specified in a request, the data or imagery most relevant to the provided time value, if any, will be returned. If the time parameter is not specified in a request, the latest data or imagery valid for the present system time will be returned to the client. If the time parameter is not specified and no data or imagery is available for the present time, no data will be returned.

This service is configured with time coverage support, meaning that the service will always return the most relevant available data, if any, to the specified time value. For example, if the service contains data valid today at 12:00 and 12:10 UTC, but a map request specifies a time value of today at 12:07 UTC, the data valid at 12:10 UTC will be returned to the user. This behavior allows more flexibility for users, especially when displaying multiple time-enabled layers together despite slight differences in temporal resolution or update frequency.

When interacting with this time-enabled service, only a single instantaneous time value should be specified in each request. If instead a time range is specified in a request (i.e. separate start time and end time values are given), the data returned may be different than what was intended.

Care must be taken to ensure the time value specified in each request falls within the current time coverage of the service. Because this service is frequently updated as new data becomes available, the user must periodically determine the service's time extent. However, due to software limitations, the time extent of the service and map layers as advertised by ArcGIS Server does not always provide the most up-to-date start and end times of available data. Instead, users have three options for determining the latest time extent of the service:

  Issue a returnUpdates=true request (ArcGIS REST protocol only)
  for an individual layer or for the service itself, which will return
  the current start and end times of available data, in epoch time format
  (milliseconds since 00:00 January 1, 1970). To see an example, click on
  the "Return Updates" link at the bottom of the REST Service page under
  "Supported Operations". Refer to the
  ArcGIS REST API Map Service Documentation
  for more information.


  Issue an Identify (ArcGIS REST) or GetFeatureInfo (WMS) request against
  the proper layer corresponding with the target dataset. For raster
  data, this would be the "Image Footprints with Time Attributes" layer
  in the same group as the target "Image" layer being displayed. For
  vector (point, line, or polygon) data, the target layer can be queried
  directly. In either case, the attributes returned for the matching
  raster(s) or vector feature(s) will include the following:


      validtime: Valid timestamp.


      starttime: Display start time.


      endtime: Display end time.


      reftime: Reference time (sometimes referred to as
      issuance time, cycle time, or initialization time).


      projmins: Number of minutes from reference time to valid
      time.


      desigreftime: Designated reference time; used as a
      common reference time for all items when individual reference
      times do not match.


      desigprojmins: Number of minutes from designated
      reference time to valid time.




  Query the nowCOAST™ LayerInfo web service, which has been created to
  provide additional information about each data layer in a service,
  including a list of all available "time stops" (i.e. "valid times"),
  individual timestamps, or the valid time of a layer's latest available
  data (i.e. "Product Time"). For more information about the LayerInfo
  web service, including examples of various types of requests, refer to
  the 
  nowCOAST™ LayerInfo Help Documentation

References

Fowler, D. and C. Ware, 1989: Strokes for Representing Vector Field Maps. Proceedings: Graphics Interface '98 249-253. Jobard, B and W. Lefer,1977: Creating evenly spaced streamlines of arbitrary density. Proceedings: Eurographics workshop on Visualization in Scientific Computing. 43-55. Mitchell, P.W., 2007: The Perceptual optimization of 2D Flow Visualizations Using Human in the Loop Local Hill Climbing. University of New Hampshire Masters Thesis. Department of Computer Science. NWS, 2013: About Global RTOFS, NCEP/EMC/MMAB, College Park, MD (Available at http://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/global/about/). Chassignet, E.P., H.E. Hurlburt, E.J. Metzger, O.M. Smedstad, J. Cummings, G.R. Halliwell, R. Bleck, R. Baraille, A.J. Wallcraft, C. Lozano, H.L. Tolman, A. Srinivasan, S. Hankin, P. Cornillon, R. Weisberg, A. Barth, R. He, F. Werner, and J. Wilkin, 2009: U.S. GODAE: Global Ocean Prediction with the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM). Oceanography, 22(2), 64-75. Mehra, A, I. Rivin, H. Tolman, T. Spindler, and B. Balasubramaniyan, 2011: A Real-Time Operational Global Ocean Forecast System, Poster, GODAE OceanView –GSOP-CLIVAR Workshop in Observing System Evaluation and Intercomparisons, Santa Cruz, CA.

Sewer System Manhole points in Fuquay-Varina. These are primarily publicly-maintained gravity sewer manhole points. However, there are also some privately-owned and privately-maintained manholes included in this dataset; they are mapped for modeling and informational purposes to provide more context for the complete Town sewer network.Please note that ALL public utility data layers can be downloaded in a single .mpkx (ArcGIS Pro map package file), updated every Friday evening. This .mpkx file can be opened directly with ArcGIS Pro version 3+. Alternatively, you can extract the file geodatabase within it by renaming the file ending .mpkx to .zip and treating it like a zip archive file, for use in any version of ArcGIS Pro or ArcMap software. You can also use QGIS, a powerful, free, and open-source GIS software.The Town of Fuquay-Varina creates, maintains, and serves out a variety of utility information to the public, including its Potable Water System, Sanitary Sewer System, and Stormwater Collection System features. This is the same utility data displayed in our public web map. This utility data includes some features designated as 'private' that are not owned or maintained by the Town, but may be helpful for modeling and other informational purposes. Please pay particular attention to the terms of use and disclaimer associated with these data. Some data includes the use of Subtypes and Domains that may not translate well to Shapefile or GeoJSON downloads available through our Open Data site. Please beware the dangers of cartographic misrepresentation if you are unfamiliar with filtering and symbolizing data based on attributes. Water System Layers:Water LinesWater ValvesWater ManholesFire HydrantsFire Department ConnectionsWater MetersRPZ (Backflow Preventers)Water TankWater Booster StationsHarnett County Water District AreaSewer System Layers:Gravity Sewer LinesForced Sewer LinesSewer ManholesSewer ValvesSewer CleanoutsSewer Pump StationsWastewater Treatment PlantsStormwater System Layers:Stormwater Lines (Pipes)Stormwater Points (Inlets/Outlets/Manholes)Stormwater Control Measure Points (SCM's, such as Wet Ponds / Retention Basins)

The map service provides the following information. General data:

Lower Water Authorities NLWKN Plants

Water protected areas:

Drinking water protection areas WSG Sanctuary protected areas HQSG Drinking water extraction areas TWGG -active WGA EAFRD grant scheme Protected areas Drinking water planar Area name and number Drinking water priority programme Hydrographic map:

List of Regions

Base catchment areas Catchment areas 4.Subdivision Catchment areas 3. Subdivision Catchment areas 2.Subdivision Catchment areas 1. Subdivision Electricity Areas Trenches Water network Wattages Water Areas

Dripping waters: List of dry-drop waters Water network 1. All right, Water network 2. Order Water network 3.Order

WFD Water Network List of dry-drop waters — standing waters Standing waters WFD-standing casks

Water density at municipal level BK50 — Evaluation of groundwater level BK50 — Evaluation of Soil Clinical Humidity Level

Level measurement network: Level measurement network GÜN Hydrological landscapes Level Hydrological landscapes

Water structure: Detail mapping photo Detailed mapping Overview Rating Total Review of the surrounding area Review of the shores Rating Sole

Groundwater report Quantity: Groundwater level measuring stations

Groundwater report Quality: Adsorption of visible light (SAK 436) Aluminium Ammonium AOX Arsenic Base capacity (pH 8.2) Lead Boron Cadmium

Calcium Chloride Chromium Iron electrical conductivity Fluoride Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) Potassium Copper Manganese Magnesium Sodium Nickel Nitrate Nitrite Phosphate pH value Mercury Oxygen Acid capacity (pH 4.3) Sulphate UV adsorption (SAK 254) Zinc Scale: 1:10000, 1:50000 System environment: ArcGIS-Server Explanation on the subject reference: Limits of water protected areas are maintained by the Lower Water Authorities (UWB). For these borders, there is one from the Nds. National water management, coastal and nature conservation operations are based on harmonised national data base based on UWB’s supplies.

Limits of flood zones are maintained by the Lower Water Authorities (UWB). For these borders, there is one from the Nds. National water management, coastal and nature conservation operations are based on harmonised national data base based on UWB’s supplies. The boundaries of the provisionally secured flood zones are based on data from the country.

Water Service Area 2018 - 3 inch Aerials for ArcGIS Online/Bing Maps/Google Maps, etc.Allow clients to export 100,000 cached tiles for offline use.Contact Info: Name: GIS Team Email: GISteam@cityoftacoma.orgCompany: Quantum Spatial, Inc.Flight Time Date Range:Beginning Date: 06/17/2018Ending Date: 07/15/2018Detailed Metadata (Internal use only)Original ArcGIS coordinate system: Type: Projected Geographic coordinate reference: GCS_North_American_1983_HARN Projection: NAD_1983_HARN_StatePlane_Washington_South_FIPS_4602_Feet Well-known identifier: 2927Geographic extent - Bounding rectangle: West longitude: -122.597308 East longitude: -121.732097 North latitude: 47.347891 South latitude: 47.061812Extent in the item's coordinate system: West longitude: 1120428.000000 East longitude: 1333428.000000 South latitude: 637207.000000 North latitude: 737082.000000