Modal Service data and Safety & Security (S&S) public transit time series data delineated by transit/agency/mode/year/month. Includes all Full Reporters--transit agencies operating modes with more than 30 vehicles in maximum service--to the National Transit Database (NTD). This dataset will be updated monthly.

The monthly ridership data is released one month after the month in which the service is provided. Records with null monthly service data reflect late reporting.

The S&S statistics provided include both Major and Non-Major Events where applicable. Events occurring in the past three months are excluded from the corresponding monthly ridership rows in this dataset while they undergo validation. This dataset is the only NTD publication in which all Major and Non-Major S&S data are presented without any adjustment for historical continuity.

Movements in the volume of production for the UK production industries: manufacturing, mining and quarrying, energy supply, and water and waste management. Figures are seasonally adjusted.

The BuildingsBench datasets consist of: Buildings-900K: A large-scale dataset of 900K buildings for pretraining models on the task of short-term load forecasting (STLF). Buildings-900K is statistically representative of the entire U.S. building stock. 7 real residential and commercial building datasets for benchmarking two downstream tasks evaluating generalization: zero-shot STLF and transfer learning for STLF. Buildings-900K can be used for pretraining models on day-ahead STLF for residential and commercial buildings. The specific gap it fills is the lack of large-scale and diverse time series datasets of sufficient size for studying pretraining and finetuning with scalable machine learning models. Buildings-900K consists of synthetically generated energy consumption time series. It is derived from the NREL End-Use Load Profiles (EULP) dataset (see link to this database in the links further below). However, the EULP was not originally developed for the purpose of STLF. Rather, it was developed to "...help electric utilities, grid operators, manufacturers, government entities, and research organizations make critical decisions about prioritizing research and development, utility resource and distribution system planning, and state and local energy planning and regulation." Similar to the EULP, Buildings-900K is a collection of Parquet files and it follows nearly the same Parquet dataset organization as the EULP. As it only contains a single energy consumption time series per building, it is much smaller (~110 GB). BuildingsBench also provides an evaluation benchmark that is a collection of various open source residential and commercial real building energy consumption datasets. The evaluation datasets, which are provided alongside Buildings-900K below, are collections of CSV files which contain annual energy consumption. The size of the evaluation datasets altogether is less than 1GB, and they are listed out below: ElectricityLoadDiagrams20112014 Building Data Genome Project-2 Individual household electric power consumption (Sceaux) Borealis SMART IDEAL Low Carbon London A README file providing details about how the data is stored and describing the organization of the datasets can be found within each data lake version under BuildingsBench.

Land cover describes the surface of the earth. This time-enabled service of the National Land Cover Database groups land cover into 20 classes based on a modified Anderson Level II classification system. Classes include vegetation type, development density, and agricultural use. Areas of water, ice and snow and barren lands are also identified.The National Land Cover Database products are created through a cooperative project conducted by the Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC). The MRLC Consortium is a partnership of federal agencies, consisting of the U.S. Geological Survey, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Forest Service, the National Park Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management and the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.Time Extent: 2001, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2011, 2013, 2016, 2019, and 2021 for the conterminous United States. The layer displays land cover for Alaska for the years 2001, 2011, and 2016. For Puerto Rico there is only data for 2001. For Hawaii, Esri reclassed land cover data from NOAA Office for Coastal Management, C-CAP into NLCD codes. These reclassed C-CAP data were available for Hawaii for the years 2001, 2005, and 2011. Hawaii C-CAP land cover in its original form can be used in your maps by adding the Hawaii CCAP Land Cover layer directly from the Living Atlas.Units: (Thematic dataset)Cell Size: 30m Source Type: Thematic Pixel Type: Unsigned 8 bitData Projection: North America Albers Equal Area Conic (102008)Mosaic Projection: North America Albers Equal Area Conic (102008)Extent: 50 US States, District of Columbia, Puerto RicoSource: National Land Cover DatabasePublication date: June 30, 2023Time SeriesThis layer is served as a time series. To display a particular year of land cover data, select the year of interest with the time slider in your map client. You may also use the time slider to play the service as an animation. We recommend a one year time interval when displaying the series. If you would like a particular year of data to use in analysis, be sure to use the analysis renderer along with the time slider to choose a valid year.North America Albers ProjectionThis layer is served in North America Albers projection. Albers is an equal area projection, and this allows users of this service to accurately calculate acreage without additional data preparation steps. This also means it takes a tiny bit longer to project on the fly into Web Mercator projection, if that is the destination projection of the service.Processing TemplatesCartographic Renderer - The default. Land cover drawn with Esri symbols. Each year's land cover data is displayed in the time series until there is a newer year of data available.Cartographic Renderer (saturated) - This renderer has the same symbols as the cartographic renderer, but the colors are extra saturated so a transparency may be applied to the layer. This renderer is useful for land cover over a basemap or relief. MRLC Cartographic Renderer - Cartographic renderer using the land cover symbols as issued by NLCD (the same symbols as is on the dataset when you download them from MRLC).Analytic Renderer - Use this in analysis. The time series is restricted by the analytic template to display a raster in only the year the land cover raster is valid. In a cartographic renderer, land cover data is displayed until a new year of data is available so that it plays well in a time series. In the analytic renderer, data is displayed for only the year it is valid. The analytic renderer won't look good in a time series animation, but in analysis this renderer will make sure you only use data for its appropriate year.Simplified Renderer - NLCD reclassified into 10 broad classes. These broad classes may be easier to use in some applications or maps.Forest Renderer - Cartographic renderer which only displays the three forest classes, deciduous, coniferous, and mixed forest.Developed Renderer - Cartographic renderer which only displays the four developed classes, developed open space plus low, medium, and high intensity development classes.Hawaii data has a different sourceMRLC redirects users interested in land cover data for Hawaii to a NOAA product called C-CAP or Coastal Change Analysis Program Regional Land Cover. This C-CAP land cover data was available for Hawaii for the years 2001, 2005, and 2011 at the time of the latest update of this layer. The USA NLCD Land Cover layer reclasses C-CAP land cover codes into NLCD land cover codes for display and analysis, although it may be beneficial for analytical purposes to use the original C-CAP data, which has finer resolution and untranslated land cover codes. The C-CAP land cover data for Hawaii is served as its own 2.4m resolution land cover layer in the Living Atlas.Because it's a different original data source than the rest of NLCD, different years for Hawaii may not be able to be compared in the same way different years for the other states can. But the same method was used to produce each year of this C-CAP derived land cover to make this layer. Note: Because there was no C-CAP data for Kaho'olawe Island in 2011, 2005 data were used for that island.The land cover is projected into the same projection and cellsize as the rest of the layer, using nearest neighbor method, then it is reclassed to approximate the NLCD codes. The following is the reclass table used to make Hawaii C-CAP data closely match the NLCD classification scheme:C-CAP code,NLCD code0,01,02,243,234,225,216,827,818,719,4110,4211,4312,5213,9014,9015,9516,9017,9018,9519,3120,3121,1122,1123,1124,025,12USA NLCD Land Cover service classes with corresponding index number (raster value):11. Open Water - areas of open water, generally with less than 25% cover of vegetation or soil.12. Perennial Ice/Snow - areas characterized by a perennial cover of ice and/or snow, generally greater than 25% of total cover.21. Developed, Open Space - areas with a mixture of some constructed materials, but mostly vegetation in the form of lawn grasses. Impervious surfaces account for less than 20% of total cover. These areas most commonly include large-lot single-family housing units, parks, golf courses, and vegetation planted in developed settings for recreation, erosion control, or aesthetic purposes.22. Developed, Low Intensity - areas with a mixture of constructed materials and vegetation. Impervious surfaces account for 20% to 49% percent of total cover. These areas most commonly include single-family housing units.23. Developed, Medium Intensity - areas with a mixture of constructed materials and vegetation. Impervious surfaces account for 50% to 79% of the total cover. These areas most commonly include single-family housing units.24. Developed High Intensity - highly developed areas where people reside or work in high numbers. Examples include apartment complexes, row houses and commercial/industrial. Impervious surfaces account for 80% to 100% of the total cover.31. Barren Land (Rock/Sand/Clay) - areas of bedrock, desert pavement, scarps, talus, slides, volcanic material, glacial debris, sand dunes, strip mines, gravel pits and other accumulations of earthen material. Generally, vegetation accounts for less than 15% of total cover.41. Deciduous Forest - areas dominated by trees generally greater than 5 meters tall, and greater than 20% of total vegetation cover. More than 75% of the tree species shed foliage simultaneously in response to seasonal change.42. Evergreen Forest - areas dominated by trees generally greater than 5 meters tall, and greater than 20% of total vegetation cover. More than 75% of the tree species maintain their leaves all year. Canopy is never without green foliage.43. Mixed Forest - areas dominated by trees generally greater than 5 meters tall, and greater than 20% of total vegetation cover. Neither deciduous nor evergreen species are greater than 75% of total tree cover. 51. Dwarf Scrub - Alaska only areas dominated by shrubs less than 20 centimeters tall with shrub canopy typically greater than 20% of total vegetation. This type is often co-associated with grasses, sedges, herbs, and non-vascular vegetation.52. Shrub/Scrub - areas dominated by shrubs; less than 5 meters tall with shrub canopy typically greater than 20% of total vegetation. This class includes true shrubs, young trees in an early successional stage or trees stunted from environmental conditions.71. Grassland/Herbaceous - areas dominated by gramanoid or herbaceous vegetation, generally greater than 80% of total vegetation. These areas are not subject to intensive management such as tilling, but can be utilized for grazing.72. Sedge/Herbaceous - Alaska only areas dominated by sedges and forbs, generally greater than 80% of total vegetation. This type can occur with significant other grasses or other grass like plants, and includes sedge tundra, and sedge tussock tundra.73. Lichens - Alaska only areas dominated by fruticose or foliose lichens generally greater than 80% of total vegetation.74. Moss - Alaska only areas dominated by mosses, generally greater than 80% of total vegetation.Planted/Cultivated 81. Pasture/Hay - areas of grasses, legumes, or grass-legume mixtures planted for livestock grazing or the production of seed or hay crops, typically on a perennial cycle. Pasture/hay vegetation accounts for greater than 20% of total vegetation.82. Cultivated Crops - areas used for the production of annual crops, such as corn, soybeans, vegetables, tobacco, and cotton, and also perennial woody crops such as orchards and vineyards. Crop vegetation accounts for greater than 20% of total vegetation. This class also includes all land being actively tilled.90. Woody Wetlands - areas where forest or shrubland vegetation accounts for greater than 20% of vegetative cover and the soil or

The Nuclear Medicine National HQ System database is a series of MS Excel spreadsheets and Access Database Tables by fiscal year. They consist of information from all Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) performing or contracting nuclear medicine services in Veterans Affairs medical facilities. The medical centers are required to complete questionnaires annually (RCS 10-0010-Nuclear Medicine Service Annual Report). The information is then manually entered into the Access Tables, which includes: * Distribution and cost of in-house VA - Contract Physician Services, whether contracted services are made via sharing agreement (with another VA medical facility or other government medical providers) or with private providers. * Workload data for the performance and/or purchase of PET/CT studies. * Organizational structure of services. * Updated changes in key imaging service personnel (chiefs, chief technicians, radiation safety officers). * Workload data on the number and type of studies (scans) performed, including Medicare Relative Value Units (RVUs), also referred to as Weighted Work Units (WWUs). WWUs are a workload measure calculated as the product of a study's Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code, which consists of total work costs (the cost of physician medical expertise and time), and total practice costs (the costs of running a practice, such as equipment, supplies, salaries, utilities etc). Medicare combines WWUs together with one other parameter to derive RVUs, a workload measure widely used in the health care industry. WWUs allow Nuclear Medicine to account for the complexity of each study in assessing workload, that some studies are more time consuming and require higher levels of expertise. This gives a more accurate picture of workload; productivity etc than using just 'total studies' would yield. * A detailed Full-Time Equivalent Employee (FTEE) grid, and staffing distributions of FTEEs across nuclear medicine services. * Information on Radiation Safety Committees and Radiation Safety Officers (RSOs). Beginning in 2011 this will include data collection on part-time and non VA (contract) RSOs; other affiliations they may have and if so to whom they report (supervision) at their VA medical center.Collection of data on nuclear medicine services' progress in meeting the special needs of our female veterans. Revolving documentation of all major VA-owned gamma cameras (by type) and computer systems, their specifications and ages. * Revolving data collection for PET/CT cameras owned or leased by VA; and the numbers and types of PET/CT studies performed on VA patients whether produced on-site, via mobile PET/CT contract or from non-VA providers in the community.* Types of educational training/certification programs available at VA sites * Ongoing funded research projects by Nuclear Medicine (NM) staff, identified by source of funding and research purpose. * Data on physician-specific quality indicators at each nuclear medicine service.* Academic achievements by NM staff, including published books/chapters, journals and abstracts. * Information from polling field sites re: relevant issues and programs Headquarters needs to address. * Results of a Congressionally mandated contracted quality assessment exercise, also known as a Proficiency study. Study results are analyzed for comparison within VA facilities (for example by mission or size), and against participating private sector health care groups. * Information collected on current issues in nuclear medicine as they arise. Radiation Safety Committee structures and membership, Radiation Safety Officer information and information on how nuclear medicine services provided for female Veterans are examples of current issues.The database is now stored completely within MS Access Database Tables with output still presented in the form of Excel graphs and tables.

Abstract

The central statistical offices in most countries place heavy emphasis on constructing sound databases for all activities within the services sector. PCBS’ Services Statistics Program is part of the Economic Statistics Program, which is part of the larger program for establishing the System of Official Statistics for Palestine. PCBS initiated, in the reference year 1994, the economic surveys series. The series includes, in addition to the services survey, surveys on industry, internal trade construction-contractors, and transport and storage sectors for the purpose of establishing a time series database of economic activities in line with international recommendations specified in System of National Account (SNA) 93 and in the UN manual for Services Statistics.

Objectives: The objective of the survey was to obtain data on:

1. Number of enterprises and persons engaged in services by activity and location.
2. Value of output, intermediate consumption and stocks.
3. Value added components.
4. Payments and transfers.
5. Capital formation.
6. Contribution of the surveyed activities to the GDP and other National Accounts variables.

Target Population

PCBS depends on the International and Industrial Classification of all economic activities, version 3, (ISIC - 3) by the United Nation to classify the economic activities. The services survey covers the following activities: 1. Hotels and restaurants 2. Real estate, renting and business activities 3. Education 4. Health and social work 5. Other community, social and personal service activities

Geographic coverage

West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Analysis unit

Enterprise constitutes the primary sampling unit (PSU)

Universe

Enterprise: It is an economic entity that is capable, in its own right, of owning assets, incurring liabilities and engaging in economic activities and in transactions with other entities. Includes enterprise related to household and branches, and enterprise related to non-financial companies sector.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The sample of the Services Survey is a single-stage stratified random - systematic sample in which the enterprise constitutes the primary sampling unit (PSU). Three levels of strata were used to arrive at an efficient representative sample (i.e. economic activity, size of employment and geographical levels).

The sample size amounted to 1,522 enterprises out of the 12,970 enterprises that comprise the survey frame.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

Survey Questionnaire

There is one form of the services survey questionnaire 2000, related to household and branches, and the non-finance companies sector. The questionnaire contains the following main variables: 1. Number of employees in a company and their compensations. 2. The output of the main and second activities. 3. Goods production inputs. 4. Various payments and transfers. 5. Indirect taxes. 6. Enterprises assets.

Cleaning operations

Data processing: For ensuring quality and consistency of data, a set of measures were taken into account for strengthening accuracy of data as follows: - Preparing data entry program before data collection for checking readiness of the program for data entry. - A set of validation rules were applied on the program for checking consistency of data. - Efficiency of the program was checked through pre-testing in entering few questionnaires, including incorrect information for checking its efficiency in capturing these information. - Well trained data keyers were selected and trained for the main data entry. - Weekly or biweekly data files were received by project management for checking accuracy and consistency, notes of correction were provided for data entry management for correction.

Response rate

82%

Sampling error estimates

Statistical Errors: The findings of the survey are affected by statistical errors due to using sampling in conducting the survey for the units of the target population, which increases the chances of having variances from the actual values we expect to obtain from the data had we conducted the survey using comprehensive enumeration. The variance of the key goods in the survey was computed and dissemination was carried out on the level of the Palestinian Territory for reasons related to sample design and computation of the variance of the different indicators.

Non-Statistical Errors These types of errors could appear on one or all the survey stages that include data collection and data entry: Response errors: these types of errors are related to, responders, fieldworkers, and data entry personnel's. And to avoid mistakes and reduce the impact has been a series of actions that would enhance the accuracy of the data through a process of data collection from the field and the data processing.

The watershed data management (WDM) database SC21.WDM is updated with the processed data for the period October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021. The precipitation data are collected from a tipping-bucket rain-gage network and the hydrologic data (stage and discharge) are collected at USGS streamflow-gaging stations in and around DuPage County, Illinois. Hourly precipitation and hydrologic data for the period October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021, are processed following the guidelines described in Bera (2014) and Murphy and Ishii (2006) and appended to SC20.WDM and renamed as SC21.WDM. Meteorological data (wind speed, solar radiation, air temperature, dewpoint temperature, and potential evapotranspiration) from October 1, 2019, through September 30, 2020, are copied from ARGN21.WDM and appended to SC21.WDM. Data in dataset number (DSN) 107 and 801–810 are used in comparisons of precipitation data. DSN 107 contains hourly precipitation data collected at Argonne National Laboratory at Argonne, Illinois. DSN 801-810 contains the processed Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD)-multisensor precipitation estimates (MPE) data from 10 NEXRAD–MPE subbasins in the Salt Creek watershed as described in Bera and Ortel (2018). Data in these DSNs are not quality-assured and quality-controlled. The data are downloaded and uploaded daily into a WDM database that is used for the real-time streamflow simulation system. Data from DSN 107 and 801-810 are copied from this WDM and stored in SC21.WDM. DSN 107 and 801-810 are updated with the data through September 30, 2021. Data in DSN 5400 (water-surface elevation at the quarry) and 5700 (water surface elevation at Thorndale) are updated through September 30, 2021, similarly (Murphy and Ishii, 2006). Errors have been found in each of ARGNXX.WDM prior to Water Year (WY) 2023. XX represents last two digits of a WY. A WY is the 12-month period, October 1 through September 30, in which it ends. SC21.wdm contains erroneous meteorological data and related flag values thereby. SC21.WDM is removed. User is advised to download SC22.WDM from https://doi.org/10.5066/P14D6FRA. SC22.WDM (Bera, 2024b) contains corrected meteorological data from ARGN23.WDM (Bera, 2024a) for the period from January 1, 1997, through September 30, 2022. This database file also contains the quality-assured and quality-controlled hydrologic data for the period January 1, 1997, through September 30, 2022, processed following the guidelines documented in Bera (2014). While SC21.WDM is available from the author, all the records in SC21.WDM can be found in SC22.WDM as well. The complete list of missing precipitation data periods and the nearby stations used to fill in those missing periods from October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021, is given in Table1.csv. This file is in the comma separated values (CSV) file format and can be downloaded from this landing page. The list of snow affected days of precipitation data and the missing and estimated period of the stage and flow data in SC22.WDM database during the period October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021, are given in the USGS annual Water Data Report at https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis. To open the WDM database SC22.WDM user needs to install Sara Timeseries utility described in the section "Related External Resources". First posted - March 7, 2023 (available from author) References Cited: Bera, M., 2024a, Meteorological Database, Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P146RBHK. _ 2024b, Watershed Data Management (WDM) Database (SC22.WDM) for Salt Creek Streamflow Simulation, DuPage County, Illinois, January 1, 1997, through September 30, 2022: U.S. Geological Survey, https://doi.org/10.5066/P14D6FRA. Bera, M., and Ortel, T.W., 2018, Processing of next generation weather radar-multisensor precipitation estimates and quantitative precipitation forecast data for the DuPage County streamflow simulation system: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2017–1159, 16 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20171159. Bera, M., 2014, Watershed Data Management (WDM) database for Salt Creek streamflow simulation, DuPage County, Illinois, water years 2005–11: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 870, 18 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ds870. Murphy, E.A., and Ishii, A.L., 2006, Watershed Data Management (WDM) database for Salt Creek streamflow simulation, DuPage County, Illinois: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006–1248, 34 p. Sara Timeseries utility at https://www.respec.com/product/modeling-optimization/sara-timeseries-utility/.

The WDM database SC17.WDM is updated with the quality-assured and quality-controlled (QA/QC) data from October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2018, and renamed as SC18.WDM. Meteorological data (wind speed, solar radiation, air temperature, dew point temperature, and potential evapotranspiration) and the three digit flags corresponding to wind speed, solar radiation, air temperature, and dew point temperature are copied from ARGN18.WDM and stored in this database. Data in dataset number (DSN) 107 and 801–810 are used in comparisons of precipitation data. DSN 107 contains hourly precipitation data collected at Argonne National Laboratory at Argonne, Illinois. DSN 801-810 contains the processed Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD)-Multisensor Precipitation Estimates (MPE) data from 10 NEXRAD–MPE subbasins in the Salt Creek watershed as described in Bera and Ortel (2018). Data in these DSNs are not quality-assured and quality-controlled. The data are downloaded and uploaded daily into a WDM database that is used for the real-time streamflow simulation system. Data from DSN 107 and 801-810 are copied from this WDM and stored in SC18.WDM. DSN 107 and 801-810 are updated with the data through September 30, 2018. Data in DSN 5400 (water-surface elevation at the quarry) and 5700 (water surface elevation at Thorndale) are updated through September 30, 2018, similarly (Murphy and Ishii, 2006). Errors have been found in each of ARGNXX.WDM prior to Water Year (WY) 2023. XX represents last two digits of a WY. A WY is the 12-month period, October 1 through September 30, in which it ends. SC18.wdm contains erroneous meteorological data and related flag values thereby. SC18.WDM is removed. User is advised to download SC22.WDM from https://doi.org/10.5066/P14D6FRA. SC22.WDM (Bera, 2024b) contains corrected meteorological data from ARGN23.WDM (Bera, 2024a) for the period from January 1, 1997, through September 30, 2022. This database file also contains the quality-assured and quality-controlled hydrologic data for the period January 1, 1997, through September 30, 2022, processed following the guidelines documented in Bera (2014). While SC18.WDM is available from the author, all the records in SC18.WDM can be found in SC22.WDM as well. The complete list of missing precipitation data periods and the nearby stations used to fill in those missing periods from October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2018, is given in the table, missing_data. The list of snow affected days of precipitation data and the missing and estimated period of the stage and flow data in SC22.WDM database during the period October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2018, are given in the USGS annual Water Data Report at https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis. To open the WDM database SC22.WDM user needs to install Sara Timeseries utility described in the section "Related External Resources". First posted - April 2, 2020 (available from author) References Cited: Bera, M., 2024a, Meteorological Database, Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P146RBHK. _ 2024b, Watershed Data Management (WDM) Database (SC22.WDM) for Salt Creek Streamflow Simulation, DuPage County, Illinois, January 1, 1997, through September 30, 2022: U.S. Geological Survey, https://doi.org/10.5066/P14D6FRA. Bera, M., and Ortel, T.W., 2018, Processing of next generation weather radar-multisensor precipitation estimates and quantitative precipitation forecast data for the DuPage County streamflow simulation system: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2017–1159, 16 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20171159. Bera, M., 2014, Watershed Data Management (WDM) database for Salt Creek streamflow simulation, DuPage County, Illinois, water years 2005–11: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 870, 18 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ds870. Murphy, E.A., and Ishii, A.L., 2006, Watershed Data Management (WDM) database for Salt Creek streamflow simulation, DuPage County, Illinois: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006–1248, 34 p. Sara Timeseries utility at https://www.respec.com/product/modeling-optimization/sara-timeseries-utility/.

This data publication includes a grid composed by contiguous 25 x 25 km square elements covering the Italian area and each parametrized by 1) the maximum length of faults included within the cell, 2) the maximum magnitude from instrumental seismic data, 3) the maximum magnitude from historical seismic data, 4) the maximum magnitude calculated from fault length using empirical scaling laws. This collection represents the basis to a work (Trippetta et al., 2019) aiming to test a fast method comparing the geologic (faults) and the seismologic (historical-instrumental seismicity) information available for a specific region. To do so, (1) a comprehensive catalogue of all known faults and (2) a comprehensive catalogue of earthquakes were compiled by merging the most complete available databases; (3) the related possible maximum magnitudes were derived from fault dimensions, upon the assumption of seismic reactivability of any fault; (4) the calculated magnitudes were compared with earthquake magnitudes recorded in historical and instrumental time series. Faults: to build the dataset of faults for Italy, the following databases were merged: (1) the entire faults collection after the Italian geological maps at the 1:100,000 scale (available online at www.isprambiente.it); (2) the faults compilation from the structural model of Italy at the 1:500,000 scale (Bigi et al., 1989); (3) faults provided in the ITHACA-Italian catalogue of capable faults (Michetti et al., 2000); and (4) the inventory of active faults of the GNDT (Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti, Galadini et al., 2000). To improve and implement the database, published complementary studies were selected for some specific areas considered to not be exhaustively covered by the aforementioned collection of faults, including Sardinia, SW Alps, Tuscany, the Adriatic front, Puglia, and the Calabrian Arc. For these areas, faults were selected on the grounds of scientific contributions that documented recent fault activity based on seismic, field, and paleoseismological data. In particular, for the southern Sardinia, the fault pattern proposed by Casula et al. (2001) was used. For the SW Alps, the works of Augliera et al. (1994), Courboulex et al. (1998), Larroque et al. (2001), Christophe et al. (2012), Sue et al. (2007), Capponi et al. (2009), Turino et al. (2009) and Sanchez et al. (2010) were followed. For the Tuscany area, Brogi et al. (2003), Brogi et al. (2005), Brogi (2006), Brogi (2008), Brogi (2011), and Brogi and Fabbrini (2009) were consulted. For the buried northern Apennines and Adriatic front, the fault datasets provided by Scrocca (2006), Cuffaro et al. (2010), and Fantoni and Franciosi (2010) were used. For the Puglia region, data from Patacca and Scandone (2004) and Del Gaudio et al. (2007) were used, while for the Calabrian Arc data were obtained from Polonia et al. (2016). Seismicity: to obtain a complete earthquake catalogue for the Italian territory, the following catalogues of instrumental and historical seismicity were integrated: (1) the CSI1.1 database (http://csi.rm.ingv.it; Castello et al., 2006) for the period 1981–2002, (2) the ISIDe database (http://iside.rm.ingv.it/iside/; IsideWorkingGroup, 2016) for the period 2003–2017 (Figure 3) and the CPTI15 (https://emidius.mi.ingv.it/CPTI15-DBMI15/; Rovida et al., 2016) for the period 1000-1981. The CSI 1.1 database (Castello et al., 2006) is a relocated catalogue of Italian earthquakes during the period 1997–2002. This collection derives from the work of Chiarabba et al. (2005). Most seismic events are lower than 4.0 in magnitude and are mostly located in the upper 12 km of the crust. A few earthquakes exceed magnitude 5.0, and the largest event is Mw 6.0. Due to their poorly constrained location, events with Mw < 2.0 were removed. The ISIDe database (IsideWorkingGroup, 2016) provides the parameters of earthquakes obtained by integrating data from real time and Italian Seismic Bulletin earthquakes. The time-span of this compilation begins in 1985. To avoid an overlap with the CSI database, only the time interval 2003–2017 was considered. Mw = 2.0 is the lower limit used for earthquake magnitude. The CPTI15 database integrates the italian macroseismic database version 2015 (DBMI15, Locati et al., 2016) and instrumental data from 26 different catalogues, databases and regional studies starting from the 1000 up to the 2014. To avoid overlapping of data with the utilized instrumental datasets, from the CPTI2015 we took data for the period 1000-1981 in the range of Mw 4-7. Method: starting from the entire faults dataset, the length of each structure was calculated (Lf, in km). Then, the Italian territory was divided into a grid with square cells of 25 x 25 km. The length of the longest fault crossing each cell characterizes the parameter “fault length” (Lf) of the considered cell. In the second step, these lengths were used as the input parameter to empirically derive the magnitude. The equations provided by Leonard (2010), were applied for earthquake magnitude-fault length relationships to infer the Potential Expected Maximum Magnitude as M = a + b ∗ log (Lf), with a=4.24 and b=1.67. The obtained magnitudes were assigned to each single cell. Furthermore, the maximum magnitude recorded/reported in instrumental/historical catalogs is associated to each containing cell. The resulting datasets are presented in txt format and included in the following files: - Grid_Coordinates.txt (contains ID and coordinates of grid's elements)- Grid_Structure.txt (contains geometry and specifications of the used grid)- Table_results (five columns table containing 1=element ID, 2= element max fault length (Lf_max in km), 3=element max Mw from instrumental record (MwInstr_max), 4=element max Mw from historical record (MwHist_max), 5=element max Mw derived by empirical relationship (PEMM).- The full list of references is included in the file Petricca_2018-003_References.txt

The ARS Water Data Base is a collection of precipitation and streamflow data from small agricultural watersheds in the United States. This national archive of variable time-series readings for precipitation and runoff contains sufficient detail to reconstruct storm hydrographs and hyetographs. There are currently about 14,000 station years of data stored in the data base. Watersheds used as study areas range from 0.2 hectare (0.5 acres) to 12,400 square kilometers (4,786 square miles). Raingage networks range from one station per watershed to over 200 stations. The period of record for individual watersheds vary from 1 to 50 years. Some watersheds have been in continuous operation since the mid 1930's. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: FORMAT INFORMATION FOR VARIOUS RECORD TYPES. File Name: format.txtResource Description: Format information identifying fields and their length will be included in this file for all files except those ending with the extension .txt TYPES OF FILES As indicated in the previous section data has been stored by location number in the form, LXX where XX is the location number. In each subdirectory, there will be various files using the following naming conventions: Runoff data: WSXXX.zip where XXX is the watershed number assigned by the WDC. This number may or may not correspond to a naming convention used in common literature. Rainfall data: RGXXXXXX.zip where XXXXXX is the rain gage station identification. Maximum-minimum daily air temperature: MMTXXXXX.zip where XXXXX is the watershed number assigned by the WDC. Ancillary text files: NOTXXXXX.txt where XXXXX is the watershed number assigned by the WDC. These files will contain textual information including latitude-longitude, name commonly used in literature, acreage, most commonly-associated rain gage(s) (if known by the WDC), a list of all rain gages on or near the watershed. Land use, topography, and soils as known by the WDC. Topographic maps of the watersheds: MAPXXXXX.zip where XXXXX is the location/watershed number assigned by the WDC. Map files are binary TIF files. NOT ALL FILE TYPES MAY BE AVAILABLE FOR SPECIFIC WATERSHEDS. Data files are still being compiled and translated into a form viable for this archive. Please bear with us while we grow.Resource Title: Data Inventory - watersheds. File Name: inventor.txtResource Description: Watersheds at which records of runoff were being collected by the Agricultural Research Service. Variables: Study Location & Number of Rain Gages1; Name; Lat.; Long; Number; Pub. Code; Record Began; Land Use2; Area (Acres); Types of Data3Resource Title: Information about the ARS Water Database. File Name: README.txtResource Title: INDEX TO INFORMATION ON EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS. File Name: INDEX.TXTResource Description: This report includes identification information on all watersheds operated by the ARS. Only some of these are included in the ARS Water Data Base. They are so indicated in the column titled ARS Water Data Base. Other watersheds will not have data available here or through the Water Data Center. This index is particularly important since it relates watershed names with the indexing system used by the Water Data Center. Each location has been assigned a number. The data for that location will be stored in a sub-directory coded as LXX where XX is the location number. The index also indicates the watershed number used by the WDC. Data for a particular watershed will be stored in a compressed file named WSXXXXX.zip where XXXXX is the watershed number assigned by the WDC. Although not included in the index, rain gage information will be stored in compressed files named RGXXXXXX.zip where XXXXXX is a 6-character identification of the rain gage station. The Index also provides information such as latitude-longitude for each of the watersheds, acreage, the period-of-record for each acreage. Multiple entries for a particular watershed will either indicate that the acreage designated for the watershed changed or there was a break in operations of the watershed. Resource Title: ARS Water Database files. File Name: ars_water.zipResource Description: USING THIS SYSTEM Before downloading huge amounts of data from the ARS Water Data Base, you should first review the text files included in this directory. They include: INDEX OF ARS EXPERIMENTAL WATERSHEDS: index.txt This report includes identification information on all watersheds operated by the ARS. Only some of these are included in the ARS Water Data Base. They are so indicated in the column titled ARS Water Data Base. Other watersheds will not have data available here or through the Water Data Center. This index is particularly important since it relates watershed names with the indexing system used by the Water Data Center. Each location has been assigned a number. The data for that location will be stored in a sub-directory coded as LXX where XX is the location number. The index also indicates the watershed number used by the WDC. Data for a particular watershed will be stored in a compressed file named WSXXXXX.zip where XXXXX is the watershed number assigned by the WDC. Although not included in the index, rain gage information will be stored in compressed files named RGXXXXXX.zip where XXXXXX is a 6-character identification of the rain gage station. The Index also provides information such as latitude-longitude for each of the watersheds, acreage, the period-of-record for each acreage. Multiple entries for a particular watershed will either indicate that the acreage designated for the watershed changed or there was a break in operations of the watershed. STATION TABLE FOR THE ARS WATER DATA BASE: station.txt This report indicates the period of record for each recording station represented in the ARS Water Data Base. The data for a particular station will be stored in a single compressed file. FORMAT INFORMATION FOR VARIOUS RECORD TYPES: format.txt Format information identifying fields and their length will be included in this file for all files except those ending with the extension .txt TYPES OF FILES As indicated in the previous section data has been stored by location number in the form, LXX where XX is the location number. In each subdirectory, there will be various files using the following naming conventions: Runoff data: WSXXX.zip where XXX is the watershed number assigned by the WDC. This number may or may not correspond to a naming convention used in common literature. Rainfall data: RGXXXXXX.zip where XXXXXX is the rain gage station identification. Maximum-minimum daily air temperature: MMTXXXXX.zip where XXXXX is the watershed number assigned by the WDC. Ancillary text files: NOTXXXXX.txt where XXXXX is the watershed number assigned by the WDC. These files will contain textual information including latitude-longitude, name commonly used in literature, acreage, most commonly-associated rain gage(s) (if known by the WDC), a list of all rain gages on or near the watershed. Land use, topography, and soils as known by the WDC. Topographic maps of the watersheds: MAPXXXXX.zip where XXXXX is the location/watershed number assigned by the WDC. Map files are binary TIF files. NOT ALL FILE TYPES MAY BE AVAILABLE FOR SPECIFIC WATERSHEDS. Data files are still being compiled and translated into a form viable for this archive. Please bear with us while we grow.

Impact of MCHNP on service utilization using interrupted time series analysis.

The information provided in this dataset is categorized/symbolized as either 1) the depth range to which a well or borehole has been drilled or 2) the aquifer or activity status of monitor wells having attached time series data. Only the locations of well/borehole stations currently registered in the SFWMD DBHYDRO database are available for viewing through this mapping application. The inventory of stations in DBHYDRO include wells installed and boreholes drilled by or on behalf of the SFWMD, United States Geological Survey (USGS), United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), state, county and local government agencies, regulated utilities, and oil & gas companies for various purposes. NOTE: This data-set was compiled for the purpose of aiding groundwater resource evaluations.Many of the wells/boreholes owned and/or operated by SFWMD or other entities are included in DBHYDRO, but it is not, and should not be viewed as a comprehensive well inventory. The web layer is created daily using an Extract-Transform-Load (ETL) on the SFWMD wrep Oracle database view “DMDBASE.WELL_MAP_ROLLUP_VW” which itself consolidates information from multiple database tables to produce the map view. The web layer symbolized by the monitoring status and depth range can be customized by filtering on specific attributes. Fields for attributes include, but are not limited to: water supply planning region, county, watershed, water management district, agency, purpose, status (active or inactive), aquifer system or specific aquifer within a system. Each well location is linked to its corresponding station in DBHYDRO from which a variety of data and information on a well can be obtained. These data and information include water level and water quality time series monitoring data, depth, well construction, hydrostratigraphy, lithology, geophysical logs, hydraulic characteristics, and technical reports.The following fields are available for filtering:- Station: The DBHYDRO database station name associated with the well.- Agency: The agency primarily responsible for the monitoring data (The agency to whom data is most recently attributed)- Aquifer: The specific aquifer monitored if applicable- Aq_System: The more general aquifer system monitored if applicable- Depth Drilled: The depth to which the borehole was drilled. It may have been backfilled before long-term monitoring began- Regnl_Network: Indicates whether or not this well is part of the so-called Regional Network - Status: The current status of monitoring if applicable- USGS_Coop_Prgm: Indicates whether or not this well is part of the United States Geological Survey cooperative monitoring program- Core_Lab: Is there core lab data for this well- Litho_Logs: Are there lithological logs for this well- Geophys_Logs: Are there geophysical logs for this well- Hydraulic_Properties: Are there hydraulic properties for this well- Construction: Is there construction information for this well- Hydrostratigraphy: Is there hydrostratigraphy data for this well- Formation: Is there formation data for this well- Flow: Is there flow data for this well- Tracer_Tests: Is there tracer test data for this well- Attachments: Are there documents available for download attached to this well- Video: Are there down-hole videos for this well- Open_Hole: Is this an open hole- Time Series Data: Are there time series data at this well- WQ_Samples: Are there water quality samples at this well- WQ_Chlorides: Are there chloride data at this well- Purposes: The purpose(s) for which this well was drilled- AQ_Perf_Test: Are there aquifer performance test (APT) data for this well- ASR: Is the purpose of this well for Aquifer Storage and Recovery - Destroyed: Was this well destroyed or plugged- Drain: is this a drain well- Exploratory: Is this an exploratory well- Inject Monitor: Is this an injection monitoring well- Inject Well: Is this an injection well- Mine: is this a mine- Observation: is this an observation well- Oil_Gas: Is this an oil or gas well- Recharge: Is this a recharge well- Test_Well: is this a test well- Unused: is this an unused well- Withdrawal: Are there withdrawals from this well- County: The coordinate-derived county within which the station resides- Region: The coordinate-derived Water Supply Planning Region within which the station resides- Watershed: The coordinate-derived SFWMD ArcHydro database watershed within which the station resides- WMD: The coordinate-derived Florida Water Management District boundary within which the station resides.