The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Kamala Harris data was reported at 47.000 % in 29 Oct 2024. This records a decrease from the previous number of 48.000 % for 22 Oct 2024. The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Kamala Harris data is updated weekly, averaging 47.000 % from Jul 2024 (Median) to 29 Oct 2024, with 15 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 49.000 % in 17 Sep 2024 and a record low of 41.000 % in 23 Jul 2024. The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Kamala Harris data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by YouGov PLC. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.PR004: The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election (Discontinued).

This analysis presents a rigorous exploration of financial data, incorporating a diverse range of statistical features. By providing a robust foundation, it facilitates advanced research and innovative modeling techniques within the field of finance.

YouGov (YOU) Stock Forecast: Polling the Market for Growth Potential

Financial data:

• Historical daily stock prices (open, high, low, close, volume)

• Fundamental data (e.g., market capitalization, price to earnings P/E ratio, dividend yield, earnings per share EPS, price to earnings growth, debt-to-equity ratio, price-to-book ratio, current ratio, free cash flow, projected earnings growth, return on equity, dividend payout ratio, price to sales ratio, credit rating)

• Technical indicators (e.g., moving averages, RSI, MACD, average directional index, aroon oscillator, stochastic oscillator, on-balance volume, accumulation/distribution A/D line, parabolic SAR indicator, bollinger bands indicators, fibonacci, williams percent range, commodity channel index)

Machine learning features:

• Feature engineering based on financial data and technical indicators

• Sentiment analysis data from social media and news articles

• Macroeconomic data (e.g., GDP, unemployment rate, interest rates, consumer spending, building permits, consumer confidence, inflation, producer price index, money supply, home sales, retail sales, bond yields)

Potential Applications:

• Stock price prediction

• Portfolio optimization

• Algorithmic trading

• Market sentiment analysis

• Risk management

Use Cases:

• Researchers investigating the effectiveness of machine learning in stock market prediction

• Analysts developing quantitative trading Buy/Sell strategies

• Individuals interested in building their own stock market prediction models

• Students learning about machine learning and financial applications

Additional Notes:

• The dataset may include different levels of granularity (e.g., daily, hourly)

• Data cleaning and preprocessing are essential before model training

• Regular updates are recommended to maintain the accuracy and relevance of the data

United States The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Joe Biden data was reported at 41.000 % in 16 Jul 2024. This records an increase from the previous number of 40.000 % for 09 Jul 2024. United States The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Joe Biden data is updated weekly, averaging 42.000 % from May 2023 (Median) to 16 Jul 2024, with 46 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 44.000 % in 16 Apr 2024 and a record low of 38.000 % in 17 Oct 2023. United States The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Joe Biden data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by YouGov PLC. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.PR004: The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election (Discontinued). If an election for president were going to be held now and the Democratic nominee was Joe Biden and the Republican nominee was Donald Trump, would you vote for...

United States The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Other data was reported at 2.000 % in 29 Oct 2024. This records an increase from the previous number of 1.000 % for 22 Oct 2024. United States The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Other data is updated weekly, averaging 2.000 % from May 2023 (Median) to 29 Oct 2024, with 61 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 8.000 % in 19 Dec 2023 and a record low of 0.000 % in 16 Apr 2024. United States The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Other data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by YouGov PLC. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.PR004: The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election (Discontinued). If an election for president were going to be held now and the Democratic nominee was Joe Biden and the Republican nominee was Donald Trump, would you vote for...

COVID-19 Behaviors DatasetBehavioral analysis of how populations in different countries responded to the pandemic. The data is based on a monthly survey where respondents note counts of various activities along with a 0-100 score related to how much they agree with a given statement. The data was collected by the Imperial College London YouGov Covid 19 Behaviour Tracker Data Hub. Additional information can be found: https://github.com/YouGov-Data/covid-19-tracker.

United States The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Donald Trump data was reported at 46.000 % in 29 Oct 2024. This stayed constant from the previous number of 46.000 % for 22 Oct 2024. United States The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Donald Trump data is updated weekly, averaging 43.000 % from May 2023 (Median) to 29 Oct 2024, with 61 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 46.000 % in 29 Oct 2024 and a record low of 38.000 % in 31 Oct 2023. United States The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Donald Trump data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by YouGov PLC. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.PR004: The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election (Discontinued). If an election for president were going to be held now and the Democratic nominee was Joe Biden and the Republican nominee was Donald Trump, would you vote for...

YouGov Pulse Data on 1200 people for June 2022. (This data seems to have come from RealityMine.) YouGov had initially accidentally sent data on only 900 respondents. On December 9th, they fixed the issue. I have kept both sets of files up.

All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 2035 adults. Fieldwork was undertaken between 14th - 22nd May 2020. The survey was carried out online. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all Scotland adults (aged 18+).

United States The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Not Sure data was reported at 3.000 % in 29 Oct 2024. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.000 % for 22 Oct 2024. United States The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Not Sure data is updated weekly, averaging 5.000 % from May 2023 (Median) to 29 Oct 2024, with 61 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 10.000 % in 28 May 2024 and a record low of 3.000 % in 29 Oct 2024. United States The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Not Sure data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by YouGov PLC. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.PR004: The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election (Discontinued). If an election for president were going to be held now and the Democratic nominee was Joe Biden and the Republican nominee was Donald Trump, would you vote for...

2 data files; 1 codebook The EUI-YouGov survey on Solidarity in Europe (2020) is a dataset containing the answers to a survey of a representative sample of more than 20,000 adults from 13 European countries and the UK. The survey has been implemented by YouGov in collaboration with the EUI. The over 70 questions cover a number of topics focused on: the concept of solidarity among EU states and beyond; response to different crises through various instruments, including the recent Covid-19 outbreak; satisfaction and trust towards governments, the EU and international actors; strength of national and European identities; value of democracy; importance and salience of various issues and threats; intention in a EU-membership referendum and other EU-related indicators including differentiated integration; world politics; left-right self-placement; gender, religion and age group; vote record in past national elections.

Data and do files are provided for the models that use this data in Chapters 3, 4 and 6.

Data used in Chapter 3 (compromise experiments) from the 2018 UML YouGov survey.

United States The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Jill Stein data was reported at 1.000 % in 29 Oct 2024. This stayed constant from the previous number of 1.000 % for 22 Oct 2024. United States The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Jill Stein data is updated weekly, averaging 1.000 % from Mar 2024 (Median) to 29 Oct 2024, with 33 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.000 % in 29 Oct 2024 and a record low of 0.000 % in 20 Aug 2024. United States The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election: Jill Stein data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by YouGov PLC. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.PR004: The Economist YouGov Polls: 2024 Presidential Election (Discontinued). If an election for president were going to be held now and the Democratic nominee was Joe Biden and the Republican nominee was Donald Trump, would you vote for...

The GLA undertakes regular polling of Londoners' views. The results from these polls appear on this page, if interested in other years' data click here.

January 2024 - GLA/YouGov poll results

Link to excel tables (XLS)

February 2024 - GLA/YouGov poll results

Link to excel tables (XLS)

March 2024 - GLA/YouGov poll results

Link to excel tables (XLS)

April 2024 - GLA/YouGov poll results

Link to excel tables (XLS)

May 2024 - GLA/YouGov poll results

Link to excel tables (XLS)

June 2024 - GLA/YouGov poll results

Link to excel tables (XLS)

July 2024 - GLA/YouGov poll results

Link to excel tables (XLS)

August 2024 - GLA/YouGov poll results

Link to excel tables (XLS)

September 2024 - GLA/YouGov poll results

Link to excel tables (XLS)

October 2024 - GLA/YouGov poll results

Link to excel tables (XLS)

November 2024 - GLA/YouGov poll results

Link to excel tables (XLS)

December 2024 - GLA/YouGov poll results

Link to excel tables (XLS)

Abstract (en): These data are being released as a preliminary version to facilitate early access to the study for research purposes. This collection has not been fully processed by ICPSR at this time, and data are released in the format provided by the principal investigators. As the study is processed and given enhanced features by ICPSR in the future, users will be able to download the updated versions of the study. Please report any data errors or problems to user support, and we will work with you to resolve any data-related issues. The American National Election Study (ANES): 2016 Pilot Study sought to test new instrumentation under consideration for potential inclusion in the ANES 2016 Time Series Study, as well as future ANES studies. Much of the content is based on proposals from the ANES user community submitted through the Online Commons page, found on the ANES home page. The survey included questions about preferences in the presidential primary, stereotyping, the economy, discrimination, race and racial consciousness, police use of force, and numerous policy issues, such as immigration law, health insurance, and federal spending. It was conducted on the Internet using the YouGov panel, an international market research firm that administers polls that collect information about politics, public affairs, products, brands, as well as other topics of general interest. The purpose of this study was to test questions for inclusion on the ANES 2016 Time Series, as well as other future ANES studies. Respondents were selected from the YouGov panel survey administered on the Internet. Response to these surveys are on a volunteer basis. The data are not weighted. This collection contains two weight variables, WEIGHT and WEIGHT_SPSS. The variable WEIGHT is the weight for analysis that is intended to generalize to the population. The variable WEIGHT_SPSS is the weight recommended to be used by SPSS users not using the Complex Samples procedures and will account for the smaller effective sample size. For more information on weights, please see the ANES 2016 Pilot Study Codebook and User Guide found within the zip package, as well as visit the ANES Data Center Web site. United States citizens age 18 or older. Smallest Geographic Unit: state The study was conducted on the Internet using the YouGov panel. The YouGov panel consists of a large and diverse set of over a million respondents who have volunteered to complete surveys online and who regularly receive invitations to do so. They receive points usually worth about 21 to 50 cents for each survey they complete. The points are redeemable for various gift cards, a YouGov t-shirt, or UNICEF a donation. A respondent has to complete about 40 surveys to be eligible for any reward. Respondents were selected from the YouGov panel by sample matching. Matching is intended to make the individuals who complete the survey represent the population on the variables used for matching. Respondents were matched to United States citizens in the 2010 American Community Survey (ACS) sample by gender, age, race, and education, and to the November 2010 Current Population Survey (CPS) for voter registration and turnout status, and to the 2007 Pew Religious Life Survey on interest in politics and party identification. 1,200 individuals from the YouGov panel were selected for the ANES Pilot Study to match the target population defined by the ACS, CPS, and Pew surveys. After data collection the sample was weighted by YouGov using propensity scores using a logistic regression with age, gender, race/ethnicity, years of education, region, and party identification included in the model. For more information on sampling, please see the ANES 2016 Pilot Study Codebook and User Guide found within the zip package, as well as visit the ANES Data Center Web site. web-based surveyThis collection has not been fully processed by ICPSR. All of the files are available in one zipped package. This collection will be fully curated at a later date. For more information on the ANES 2016 Pilot Study, please refer to the ANES Data Center Web site.

The EUI-YouGov dataset on European solidarity is built on a large survey designed by the 'Solidarity in Europe' and the SOLID ERC research teams at the EUI, and implemented by YouGov. The data aims to empirically assess public opinion on the willingness to redistribute resources within the EU and to examine political attitudes that might explain these preferences. The survey design covers a number of issues, particularly concerning attitudes towards European solidarity; preferences for solidarity in the scope of different types of crises (including COVID-19 and the war in Ukraine); satisfaction and trust in national and European institutions; attitudes towards European integration, identity, value of democracy, world politics, security and defence, Russia, NATO and a European army; preferences concerning taxes and policy priorities; the relative salience of different issues and threats facing individuals, countries and the EU; political ideology, religion and voting preferences; as well as other individual attributes such as gender, age and occupation. The survey inquired 24.261 adults over 16 EU countries and the United Kingdom, from 16 March to 24 April 2023. YouGov implemented the survey online using a randomised panel sampling mechanism to ensure it is nationally representative concerning age, gender, social class, region, level of education, voting preference and level of political interest.

Data and do files are provided for the models that use these data in Chapter 6.

🇬🇧 영국 English The GLA undertakes regular polling of Londoners' views. The results from these polls appear on this page, if interested in other years data click here. January 2023 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to excel tables (XLS) February 2023 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to excel tables (XLS) March 2023 - GLA/YouGov adhoc poll results Link to excel tables (XLS) March 2023 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to excel tables (XLS) April 2023 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to excel tables (XLS) May 2023 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to excel tables (XLS) June 2023 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to excel tables (XLS) July 2023 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to excel tables (XLS) August 2023 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to excel tables (XLS) September 2023 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to excel tables (XLS) October 2023 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to excel tables (XLS) November 2023 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to excel tables (XLS) December 2023 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to excel tables (XLS)

🇬🇧 영국 English The GLA undertakes regular polling of Londoners' views. The results from these polls appear on this page, if interested in other years data click here. January 2021 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to PDF of topline (PDF) Link to excel tables (XLS) February 2021 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to PDF of topline (PDF) Link to excel tables (XLS) March 2021 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to PDF of topline (PDF) Link to excel tables (XLS) April 2021 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to PDF of topline (PDF) Link to excel tables (XLS) May 2021 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to PDF of topline (PDF) Link to excel tables (XLS) June 2021 - GLA/YouGov poll results: wave 1 Link to PDF of topline (PDF) Link to excel tables (XLS) June 2021 - GLA/YouGov poll results: wave 2 Link to PDF of topline (PDF) Link to excel tables (XLS) July 2021 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to PDF of topline (PDF) Link to excel tables (XLS) August 2021 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to PDF of topline (PDF) Link to excel tables (XLS) September 2021 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to PDF of topline (PDF) Link to excel tables (XLS) October 2021 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to PDF of topline (PDF) Link to excel tables (XLS) November 2021 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to PDF of topline (PDF) Link to excel tables (XLS) December 2021 - GLA/YouGov poll results Link to PDF topline (PDF) Link to excel tables (XLS) Mayors Question Time - air quality awareness Link to excel tables (XLS)

Two public opinion surveys were conducted. For the first, main survey, data was collected by YouGov from 1,517 participants between 17th and 21st November 2017. Participants were identified through YouGov's pre-existing panel of survey participants and were selected to produce a nationally representative sample for the UK population. This process involved panel members being sent a link to complete the survey. Only participants who answered all questions were included in the survey data. Participants who completed the questions in a time shorter than it would take to read the questions were excluded, resulting in a valid sample of 1,497 people (out of an initial sample of 1,517). The first survey comes in 4 parts: 1- Attitudes to parties, 2- Views and desires for party representation, 3- Views and desires for party participation, 4- Views and desires for party governance. A range of explanatory variables are also included for statistical analysis. A second, shorter survey was fielded via YouGov on 8th-9th of April 2019, and gained 1,692 valid responses. This was composed of 10 questions that explored views of specific political parties. The link between citizens and the state is the crux of democratic politics, yet it is crumbling. Numerous studies have diagnosed a crisis in representative politics with decreased participation and growing levels of distrust bringing the legitimacy of democratic institutions into doubt. For many a solution has been offered by digital technology, leading parties to embrace new digital campaigning software. To explore the capacity of digital innovations to renew democracy this study argues that we need to understand the nature of the 'disconnect' between parties and the people. As such, this study departs from traditional analyses of 'digital democracy' by focusing on public attitudes. Adapting the methodological approach used by Allen and Birch (2015) the project will discern how the public and parties conceive democratic linkage in practice and as an ideal, highlighting contradictions and convergence to diagnose the problem. Correlating these insights to the functions of digital software and theories of democratic linkage (Dalton, Farrell and McAllister, 2011) the capacity of digital innovations to renew party politics is considered. To enable analysis 3 work packages (WP) are conducted. WP1: How do parties perceive democratic linkage, and how have parties used digital management systems since 2010? WP1 will first identify available forms of the type of digital innovation of interest to this project - namely 'digital management software' - and will categorise the functions they perform. Second, it will explore and develop theories of democratic linkage to provide a framework for subsequent analysis. Then, using interviews, internal party data and 3 case studies of constituency parties (1 from Labour, the Conservatives and Scottish National Party) the PI and RA will map perceptions of democratic linkage and usage of digital technology. This data will provide new insight on developments in party politics and will be used to produce case study accounts and articles that trace the form of change and consider the impact of digital technology on party organisation. WP2: How do citizens perceive democratic linkage, and how does parties' use of digital management systems affect public attitudes? WP 2 explores the impact of new technology. Working with YouGov the PI will commission 2 surveys. The first will assess public attitudes towards parties', seeking to discern how the public want parties to engage and how they perceive this to work in practice. Data will be analysed to identify conceptions of democratic linkage (WP1) and then compared with party attitudes to identify synergies and incongruities in public and party conceptions. This analysis offers a diagnosis of the state of current linkage, and will identify areas of 'disconnect' to be further examined in WP3. This WP will also probe public attitudes towards parties' use of digital campaigning techniques. Utilising a split sample survey, designed in collaboration with Dr Chris Jones, the PI will assess whether practices such as social media data mining are compatible with public notions of democratic linkage. This will inform an article, infographics and practitioner briefing papers. WP3: Can digital campaigning methods resolve the disconnect between citizens and the state? In collaboration with the think tank Involve, the PI will use 3 deliberative events to explore parties' and citizens' attitudes towards democratic linkage and test the capacity of different forms of digital technology to reconcile these perceptions. Building on survey data these events will test attitudes; exploring whether sustained reflection affects how public and party desires are conceived (drawing on work by Stoker, Hay and Barr, forthcoming). Events will identify ideal forms of linkage - findings that will be used, returning to WP1, to consider the capacity of different forms of digital technology to promote linkage and hence renew party politics. Two public opinion surveys were conducted. For the first, main survey, data was collected by YouGov from 1,517 participants between 17th and 21st November 2017. Participants were identified through YouGov's pre-existing panel of survey participants and were selected to produce a nationally representative sample for the UK population. This process involved panel members being sent a link to complete the survey. Only participants who answered all questions were included in the survey data. Participants who completed the questions in a time shorter than it would take to read the questions were excluded, resulting in a valid sample of 1,497 people (out of an initial sample of 1,517). A second, shorter survey was fielded via YouGov to panel participants on 8th-9th of April 2019, and gained 1,692 valid responses. This was composed of 10 questions that explored views of specific political parties.