- f
A comparison of the RN-SMOTE, SMOTE-Tomek Link, SMOTE-ENN, and the proposed...
- plos.figshare.com
xlsUpdated Feb 10, 2025
Share
Facebook
Twitter
EmailClick to copy linkLink copiedCiteJavad Hemmatian; Rassoul Hajizadeh; Fakhroddin Nazari (2025). A comparison of the RN-SMOTE, SMOTE-Tomek Link, SMOTE-ENN, and the proposed 1CRN-SMOTE methods on the ILPD and QSAR datasets is presented, based on various classification metrics using the Random Forest classifier. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317396.t007xlsAvailable download formatsUnique identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317396.t007Dataset updatedFeb 10, 2025Dataset provided byPLOS ONEAuthorsJavad Hemmatian; Rassoul Hajizadeh; Fakhroddin NazariLicenseAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automaticallyDescriptionA comparison of the RN-SMOTE, SMOTE-Tomek Link, SMOTE-ENN, and the proposed 1CRN-SMOTE methods on the ILPD and QSAR datasets is presented, based on various classification metrics using the Random Forest classifier.
- f
A comparison of the CRN-SMOTE and RN-SMOTE methods on the health risk...
- plos.figshare.com
xlsUpdated Feb 10, 2025ShareFacebookTwitterEmailClick to copy linkLink copiedCiteJavad Hemmatian; Rassoul Hajizadeh; Fakhroddin Nazari (2025). A comparison of the CRN-SMOTE and RN-SMOTE methods on the health risk dataset based on different classification metrics using the Random Forest classifier. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317396.t009xlsAvailable download formatsUnique identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317396.t009Dataset updatedFeb 10, 2025Dataset provided byPLOS ONEAuthorsJavad Hemmatian; Rassoul Hajizadeh; Fakhroddin NazariLicenseAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automaticallyDescriptionA comparison of the CRN-SMOTE and RN-SMOTE methods on the health risk dataset based on different classification metrics using the Random Forest classifier.
- f
The average values of evaluation metrics on ILDP, QSAR, Blood and Health...
- plos.figshare.com
xlsUpdated Feb 10, 2025+ more versionsShareFacebookTwitterEmailClick to copy linkLink copiedCiteJavad Hemmatian; Rassoul Hajizadeh; Fakhroddin Nazari (2025). The average values of evaluation metrics on ILDP, QSAR, Blood and Health risk imbalanced datasets using ADA classifiers and 10-fold cross validation methodology. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317396.t005xlsAvailable download formatsUnique identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317396.t005Dataset updatedFeb 10, 2025Dataset provided byPLOS ONEAuthorsJavad Hemmatian; Rassoul Hajizadeh; Fakhroddin NazariLicenseAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automaticallyDescriptionThe average values of evaluation metrics on ILDP, QSAR, Blood and Health risk imbalanced datasets using ADA classifiers and 10-fold cross validation methodology.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
FacebookTwitterEmailA comparison of the RN-SMOTE, SMOTE-Tomek Link, SMOTE-ENN, and the proposed 1CRN-SMOTE methods on the ILPD and QSAR datasets is presented, based on various classification metrics using the Random Forest classifier.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
A comparison of the RN-SMOTE, SMOTE-Tomek Link, SMOTE-ENN, and the proposed 1CRN-SMOTE methods on the ILPD and QSAR datasets is presented, based on various classification metrics using the Random Forest classifier.