Walden University was the leading doctorate granting university in the United States in 2021, with 846 doctorate recipients. Stanford University, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, University of California Berkeley, and Purdue University West Lafayette rounded out the top five doctorate granting universities.

In the academic year of 2020/2021 in the United States, 85,581 doctoral degrees were earned in health professions and related programs - the most out of any field of study. A further 35,976 doctoral degrees were earned in legal professions and studies.

A great advantage of our rigorous doctoral training is that as PhD economists we speak a common language that allows for efficient vetting and quick dissemination of ideas and insights. But what good is sophisticated grammar and a powerful vocabulary if the contents of our narratives are lacking? Our top three criteria for admissions to PhD programs are prior coursework in math, the quantitative GRE score, and prior coursework in economics. To attract top talent and prevent becoming a stagnant discipline that loses the influence we have in society and academia, students' creativity, originality, and drive should receive more weight.

Abstract (en): We study the research productivity of new graduates from North American PhD programs in economics from 1986 to 2000. We find that research productivity drops off very quickly with class rank at all departments, and that the rank of the graduate departments themselves provides a surprisingly poor prediction of future research success. For example, at the top ten departments as a group, the median graduate has fewer than 0.03 American Economic Review (AER)-equivalent publications at year six after graduation, an untenurable record almost anywhere. We also find that PhD graduates of equal percentile rank from certain lower-ranked departments have stronger publication records than their counterparts at higher-ranked departments. In our data, for example, Carnegie Mellon's graduates at the 85th percentile of year-six research productivity outperform 85th percentile graduates of the University of Chicago, the University of Pennsylvania, Stanford, and Berkeley. These results suggest that even the top departments are not doing a very good job of training the great majority of their students to be successful research economists. Hiring committees may find these results helpful when trying to balance class rank and place of graduate in evaluating job candidates, and current graduate students may wish to re-evaluate their academic strategies in light of these findings.

In 2021 in the United States, 44.7 percent of doctorate recipients fell within the age bracket of 26 to 30 years old. A further 30.9 percent of doctorate recipients were between the ages of 31 and 35 years old.

OVERVIEW

This data file, compiled from multiple online sources, presents 2013–2017 publication counts—articles, articles in high-impact journals, books, and books from high-impact publishers—for 2,132 professors and associate professors in 426 U.S. departments of sociology. It also includes information on institutional characteristics (e.g., institution type, highest sociology degree offered, department size) and individual characteristics (e.g., academic rank, gender, PhD year, PhD institution).

The data may be useful for investigations of scholarly productivity, the correlates of scholarly productivity, and the contributions of particular individuals and institutions. Complete population data are presented for the top 26 doctoral programs, doctoral institutions other than R1 universities, the top liberal arts colleges, and other bachelor's institutions. Sample data are presented for Carnegie R1 universities (other than the top 26) and master's institutions.

USER NOTES

Please see our paper in Scholarly Assessment Reports, freely available at https://doi.org/10.29024/sar.36 , for full information about the data set and the methods used in its compilation. The section numbers used here refer to the Appendix of that paper. See the References, below, for other papers that have made use of these data.

The data file is a single Excel file with five worksheets: Sampling, Articles, Books, Individuals, and Departments. Each worksheet has a simple rectangular format, and the cells include just text and values—no formulas or links. A few general notes apply to all five worksheets.

• The yellow column headings represent institutional (departmental) data. The blue column headings represent data for individual faculty.

• iType is institution type, as described in section A.2—TopR (top research universities), R1 (other R1 universities), OD (other doctoral universities), M (master's institutions), TopLA (top liberal arts colleges), or B (other bachelor's institutions). nType provides the same information, but as a single-digit code that is more useful for sorting the rows; 1=TopR, 2=R1, 3=OD, 4=M, 5=TopLA, and 6=B.

• Inst is a four-digit institution code. The first digit corresponds to nType, and the last three digits allow for alphabetical sorting by institution name. Indiv is a one- or two-digit code that can be used to sort the individuals by name within each department. The Inst, nType, and Indiv codes are consistent across the five worksheets.

• For binary variables such as Full professor and Female, 1 indicates yes (full professor or female) and 0 indicates no (associate professor or male).

The five worksheets represent five distinct stages in the data compilation process. First, the Sampling worksheet lists the 1,530 base-population institutions (see section A.3) and presents the characteristics of the faculty included in the data file. Each row with an entry in the Individual column represents a faculty member at one of the 426 institutions included in the data set. Each row without an entry in the Individual column represents an institution that either (a) did not meet the criteria for inclusion (section A.1) or (b) was not needed to attain the desired sample size for the R1 or M groups (section A.3).

The Articles worksheet includes the data compiled from SocINDEX, as described in section A.6. Each row with an entry in the Journal column represents an article written by one of the 2,132 faculty included in the data. Each row without an entry in the Journal column represents a faculty member without any article listings in SocINDEX for the 2013–2017 period. (Note that SocINDEX items other than peer-reviewed articles—editorials, letters, etc.—may be listed in the Journal column but assigned a value of 1 in the Excluded column and a value of 0 in the Article credit and HI article credit columns. We assigned no credit for items such as editorial and letters, but other researchers may wish to include them.) The N and i columns represent, for each article, the number of authors (N) and the faculty member's place in the byline (i), as described in section A.8. The CiteScore and Highest percentile columns were used to identify high-impact journals, as indicated in the HI journal column. The Article credit and HI article credit columns are article counts, adjusted for co-authorship.

The Books worksheet includes data compiled from Amazon and other sources, as described in section A.7. Each row with an entry in the Book column represents a book written by one of the 2,132 faculty. Each row without an entry in the Book column represents a faculty member without any book listings in Amazon during the 2013–2017 period. The publication counts in the Books worksheet—Book credit and HI book credit—follow the same format as those in the Articles worksheet.

The Individuals worksheet consolidates information from the Articles and Books worksheets so that each of the 2,132 individuals is represented by a single row. The worksheet also includes several categorical variables calculated or otherwise derived from the raw data—Years since PhD, for instance, and the three corresponding binary variables. We suspect that many data users will be most interested in the Individuals worksheet.

The Departments worksheet collapses the individual data so that each of the 426 institutions (departments) is represented by a single row. Individual characteristics such as Female and Years since PhD are presented as percentages or averages—% Female and Avg years since PhD, for instance. Each of the four productivity measures is represented by a departmental total, an average (the total divided by the number of full and associate professors), a departmental standard deviation, and a departmental median.

The number of graduates by institution type, program type, credential type, gender and Classification of Instructional Programs, Primary groupings (CIP_PG).

Title Course directors’ reflections on educational design choices in near-peer teaching of procedural skills Purpose Near-peer teaching (NPT) is widely used to substitute faculty in undergraduate training of procedural skills. Research suggests there is more to capitalize on in NPT when implemented deliberately, leading us to the following research questions: What were course directors’ design choices when creating procedural skills courses with near-peers? What informed these design choices? Materials and Methods This descriptive qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 25 course directors from 12 countries following reflexive thematic analysis. Participants were sampled through a Medline search, identifying procedural skills course directors who had recently published on NPT, complemented by other recognized experts. Interviews were transcribed and analysed combining inductive and deductive approaches, whereas Cognitive Apprenticeship informed the deductive analysis. Results Course directors appointed near-peers to teach standardizable, protocolized skills to small groups of beginners/intermediates. Additionally, near-peers and faculty were often instructed to join forces. Considering near-peers’ limited content expertise, near-peers were typically appointed to teach hands-on skills, while faculty provided clinical context and supervision. Some programs played to NP strengths of social and cognitive congruence by having them assess students’ learning needs or supporting their transition to clinical practice. Conclusions Course directors deliberately appointed near-peers and faculty to complementary roles catering to near-peer competence. Capitalizing on near-peer strengths by involving them in the co-construction of education and supporting students’ transition to practice offers promising avenues to expand near-peer contribution to teaching. Explanation of all the instruments used in the data collection (including phrasing of items in surveys) Baseline Questionnaire for interview participants, semi-structured interview guide

Objective: Describe the current situation of the area Medicine III of CAPES and detect challenges for the next four years of evaluation. Methods: The area's documents and reports of meetings were read from 2004 to 2013 Medicine III Capes as well as reports and evaluation form of each Postgraduate Program (PPG) of the area and the sub-page of the area from the Capes website. The data relating to the evaluation process, the assessment form and faculty, student and scientific production data of all of Post-Graduate Programs of Medicine III were computed and analyzed. From these data were detected the challenges of the area for the next four years (2013-2016). Results: Among the 3,806 PPG, Medicine III had 41 PPG during last triennial evaluation and progressed from 18% to 43% of PPG very good or more concept (triennium 2001-2003 and 2010-2012). Most PPG were located in the South-East region (32), three in the South and two in the North-East. There was no PPG in North or Central-West regions. In 2013 and 2014 there were four approved Professional Master Degree Programs and one Master (M) and Doctorate (PhD). The average of permanent professors was 558 teachers with about three students/professor. The number of PhD graduates has increased as well as the reason PhD/MD. The proportion of in high impact periodicals (A1, A2, B1 and B2) jumped from 30% to 50% demonstrating positive community response to the policy area. The challenges identified were: decrease regional asymmetry, increase the number of masters and doctors of excellence, reassessment of Brazilian journals, stimulate and set internationalization indicators, including post-doctors and definition of its indicators, the PPG nucleation analysis, PPG 3x3, include primary and secondary education, professional master and indicators of technological scientific production and solidarity. Conclusion: Medicine III has been scientifically consolidated and their scientific researchers demonstrated maturity reaching a high level and matched to areas of greatest tradition and history. For the maintenance and advancement of the area some challenges and goals were established to be developed in the period from 2013 to 2016.

The National Science Foundation's (NSF's) Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) provides three years of support for graduate study leading to research-based masters or doctoral degrees in disciplines relevant to the mission of the Foundation. Each year, the Program names Fellowship recipients and honorable mention nominees.

NSF's Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) provides three years of support for graduate study leading to research-based masters or doctoral degrees in disciplines relevant to the mission of the Foundation. This dataset includes GRFP award recipients for 2005.

In the academic year of 2020/21, about 690 doctoral degrees were earned by American Indian or Alaskan Native students in the United States. In that year, a further 23,479 non-resident aliens earned doctoral degrees in the U.S.

The Bren School of Environmental Science and Management is a professional graduate school and community of environmental leaders at UC Santa Barbara. With a strong focus on interdisciplinary research and education, the school offers master's programs in Environmental Data Science and Environmental Science and Management, as well as a PhD program in Environmental Science and Management. The school is known for its innovative approach to environmental problem-solving, and its faculty and students are leading experts in their fields, working to develop comprehensive, data-driven solutions to today's critical environmental problems.

The Bren School is committed to attracting and supporting students from diverse backgrounds who are passionate about environmental sustainability and leadership. The school's programs are designed to equip students with the knowledge, skills, and networks needed to succeed in their careers and make a positive impact on the environment. With its strategic location on the UC Santa Barbara campus, the school is part of a vibrant community of scholars and researchers committed to advancing their understanding of the natural world and developing innovative solutions to complex environmental challenges.

ABSTRACT: The mode of production of scientific knowledge has become complex, leading to the use of research methodological elements that also investigate subjective issues. This study aims to analyze characteristics of PhD theses that adopted the qualitative approach, defended at a Postgraduate Program in Education (PPGE) of a University of the Northeast Region of Brazil, 2013-2016 quadrennium. The theoretical basis of the work is based on contributions from Evandro Ghedin, Marcos Zanette, Marli André and Maria Amélia Franco. To achieve the proposed objective, a quali-quantitative documentary research was developed, based on the identification and analysis of the categories: theme, method, data collection procedure and data analysis technique, synthesized by grouping data extracted from theses abstracts. It was found that, of the amount of 57 theses defended in the period considered, 87.7% (n=50) used a qualitative approach, although only 32.0% (n=16) of these explain this approach in their summary. Public policy and teacher education are the most present among themes. 42.0% (n=21) of the theses clearly indicate the research method, with emphasis on documentary research. There are multiple data collection procedures in them, especially interview and document collection. In 46.0% (n=23) of the theses, the data analysis technique is specified, mainly content analysis. However, it is considered important that researchers in the field of Education clearly inform all the methodological elements of their theses in their abstracts.

In the academic year of 2020/21, about 202,334 Master's degrees were earned in business across the United States, making it the most common master's degree earned. In that same year, another 47,257 Master's degrees were earned in engineering.

In the academic year of 2022, it is expected that 551,460 female and 331,530 male students will earn a Master’s degree in the United States. These figures are a significant increase from the academic year of 1950, when 16,980 female students and 41,220 male students earned a Master’s degree.

What is a Master’s degree?

A Master’s degree is an academic degree granted by universities after finishing a Bachelor’s degree. Master’s degrees focus in on a specific field and are more specialized than a Bachelor’s. A typical Master’s program is about two years long, with the final semester focusing on the thesis. Master’s degree programs are usually harder to get into than Bachelor’s degree programs, due to the rigor of the program. Because these programs are so competitive, those with a Master’s degree are typically paid more than those with a Bachelor’s degree.

Master’s degrees in the United States

The number of master’s degrees granted in the United States has steadily increased since the 1970s and is expected to continue to increase. In 2021, the Master’s degree program with the worst job prospects in the United States by mid-career median pay was counseling, while the program with the best job prospects was a physician's assistant.

The number of postsecondary graduates, by Classification of Instructional Programs, Primary groupings (CIP_PG), International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED), age group and gender.

In 2023, the top ranked full-time business school in the United States was the Stanford Graduate School of Business in Stanford, California, where tuition costs students a total of 80,613 U.S. dollars.

This Dataset included: Movie S1 and Movie S2 for the Thesis:'Synthesis of High-Entropy Germanides and Investigation of the Formation Process'. The videos were collected at the same time as the in situ heating scanning transmission electron microscopy experiments. TEM samples were prepared by depositing a drop (5 μL) of a dilute ethanol suspension of metal salts and GeNSs onto a DENSsolutions Wildfire Si3N4 nano-chip. The heating program was monitored by DENSsolutions Impulse software. After collecting the images and EDX mapping at room temperature, the samples were heated up to 800 °C at 1 °C/s and kept at 800 °C for 10 min. Then the samples were cooled down to room temperature at 20 °C/s. Movie S1 showed the morphological changes of germanane upon heating from room temperature to 800 ˚C and ultimately leading to the formation of the FeCoNiCrVGe HEG. Movie S2 showed the morphology evolution of the high-entropy alloy nanoparticles (AuAgCuPdPt) decorated germanane as they were heated from room temperature to 800 ˚C.

In the academic year 2023/24, there were 331,602 international students from India studying in the United States. International students The majority of international students studying in the United States are originally from India and China, totaling 331,602 students and 277,398 students respectively in the 2023/24 school year. In 2022/23, there were 467,027 international graduate students , which accounted for over one third of the international students in the country. Typically, engineering and math & computer science programs were among the most common fields of study for these students. The United States is home to many world-renowned schools, most notably, the Ivy League Colleges which provide education that is sought after by both foreign and local students. International students and college Foreign students in the United States pay some of the highest fees in the United States, with an average of 24,914 U.S. dollars. American students attending a college in New England paid an average of 14,900 U.S. dollars for tuition alone and there were about 79,751 international students in Massachusetts . Among high-income families, U.S. students paid an average of 34,700 U.S. dollars for college, whereas the average for all U.S. families reached only 28,026 U.S. dollars. Typically, 40 percent of families paid for college tuition through parent income and savings, while 29 percent relied on grants and scholarships.