Population: Bihar data was reported at 127.855 Person mn in 2024. This records an increase from the previous number of 125.991 Person mn for 2023. Population: Bihar data is updated yearly, averaging 94.474 Person mn from Mar 1994 (Median) to 2024, with 31 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 127.855 Person mn in 2024 and a record low of 68.433 Person mn in 1994. Population: Bihar data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. The data is categorized under Global Database’s India – Table IN.GBG001: Population. [COVID-19-IMPACT]

In Bihar, the share of males with multiple disabilities was 1.9 percent and females at 1.3 percent. According to the 76th round of the NSO survey conducted between July and December 2018, a higher percentage of disabled men than disabled women were present in India, reflected in the northern state. The National Statistical Office (NSO) is the statistical wing of the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MOSPI), mainly responsible for laying down standards for statistical analysis, data collection, and implementation.

Vital Statistics: Birth Rate: per 1000 Population: Bihar data was reported at 25.500 NA in 2020. This records a decrease from the previous number of 25.800 NA for 2019. Vital Statistics: Birth Rate: per 1000 Population: Bihar data is updated yearly, averaging 28.500 NA from Dec 1997 (Median) to 2020, with 23 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 31.900 NA in 2000 and a record low of 25.500 NA in 2020. Vital Statistics: Birth Rate: per 1000 Population: Bihar data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. The data is categorized under India Premium Database’s Demographic – Table IN.GAH002: Vital Statistics: Birth Rate: by States.

According to the 76th round of the NSO survey conducted between July and December 2018, Bihar had a higher percentage of disabled men with a certificate of disability at 36.1 percent. The disability certificate was issued by the medical board to persons with more than 40 percent of any disability. This provides eligibility to apply for facilities, concessions and other benefits provided under various schemes.

Total Fertility Rate: Bihar: Rural data was reported at 3.100 NA in 2020. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.200 NA for 2019. Total Fertility Rate: Bihar: Rural data is updated yearly, averaging 3.550 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2020, with 16 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.400 NA in 2005 and a record low of 3.100 NA in 2020. Total Fertility Rate: Bihar: Rural data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. The data is categorized under India Premium Database’s Demographic – Table IN.GAH006: Vital Statistics: Total Fertility Rate.

This polygon dataset shows village boundaries with socio-demographic and economic Census data for 1991 for the State of Bihar, India linked to the 1991 Census. Includes village socio-demographic and economic Census attribute data such as total population, population by sex, household, literacy and illiteracy rates, and employment by industry. This layer is part of the VillageMap dataset which includes socio-demographic and economic Census data for 1991 at the village level for all the states of India. This data layer is sourced from secondary government sources, chiefly Survey of India, Census of India, Election Commission, etc.

Census: Population: Bihar: Masaurhi: Male data was reported at 31,389.000 Person in 03-01-2011. This records an increase from the previous number of 23,884.000 Person for 03-01-2001. Census: Population: Bihar: Masaurhi: Male data is updated decadal, averaging 17,453.000 Person from Mar 1971 (Median) to 03-01-2011, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 31,389.000 Person in 03-01-2011 and a record low of 8,466.000 Person in 03-01-1971. Census: Population: Bihar: Masaurhi: Male data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. The data is categorized under India Premium Database’s Demographic – Table IN.GAC005: Census: Population: By Towns and Urban Agglomerations: Bihar.

Total Fertility Rate: Bihar: Urban data was reported at 2.300 NA in 2020. This records a decrease from the previous number of 2.400 NA for 2019. Total Fertility Rate: Bihar: Urban data is updated yearly, averaging 2.500 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2020, with 16 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.200 NA in 2005 and a record low of 2.300 NA in 2020. Total Fertility Rate: Bihar: Urban data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. The data is categorized under India Premium Database’s Demographic – Table IN.GAH006: Vital Statistics: Total Fertility Rate.

Chart and table of population level and growth rate for the Muzaffarpur, India metro area from 1950 to 2025.

Poverty and empowerment impacts of the Bihar Rural Livelihoods Project: Evidence from a Mixed-Methods Cluster-Randomized Trial Jeevika is a World Bank assisted project focussed (now under the umbrella of the NRLM) on building networks of women's self-help credit and savings groups,and then using them as a base of other "vertical" interventions. This houshold and village survey data was collected over two rounds to conduct an impact evaluation of Phase 2 of the project with random assignment of the project over a two year period. Collaboration: World Bank Social Observatory team with Government of Bihar. Evaluation design, methods and implementation In order to evaluate the impacts of Jeevika, 180 panchayats were randomly selected from within 16 blocks in seven districts where scale-up of the project was planned but had not yet occurred. Some of these blocks were in districts relatively far from Patna, which had not yet been entered by the project (Madhepura, Saharsa, Supaul), while others were within the larger districts within which Jeevika was already operating (Gaya, Nalanda, Madhubani, Muzaffarpur). The project had already entered these districts in Phase 1, but had not yet expanded to all blocks due to (project) capacity constraints. Within each of the study villages, hamlets (tolas) in which the majority of the population belonged to a scheduled caste or scheduled tribe were identified. This was the same procedure as used by Jeevika to identify the target population (of poor women) for mobilization into the project. Tolas were identified through a focus group discussion held in each village, along with the population of target castes (SC/STs) within each. In Bihar, tola boundaries are easily distinguishable. Field teams would enter the tola at a random point, determine the skip pattern based on the population size and target sample size, and select households through a random walk. Survey staff aimed to include 70% SC/ST households, and 30% households from other castes in each village, in order to ensure variation in socio-economic status within the sample. If the households in selected tolas included fewer SC/ST households than this, households from nearby non-SC/ST majority tolas were also included in the sample. Interviews for the quantitative study were conducted using a structured paper survey form. Baseline and follow up surveys included detailed questions on debt, asset holdings, consumption expenditures, livelihood activities, and women’s mobility, role in household decisions, and aspirations. In addition, in each village, a focus group discussion was conducted, through which data were collected on village level attributes such as local sources of credit, interest rates from each source, local wage rates, and the presence of or distance to markets and other institutions and amenities. Respondents were not compensated for their time. If a respondent was unavailable during initial field visit, the supervisor recorded contact details and returned with interviewers at a later date. As long as the survey team was in that district, repeat visits were undertaken, keeping attrition to a minimum. If a household could not be re-surveyed at endline, it was replaced with another household in the same village. Short re-surveys containing a subset of questions from the main survey were conducted by supervisors for 10% of the sample. Staff from the project also conducted occasional visits after the survey was completed in a village to confirm that all modules had been covered by survey staff. Data was entered in duplicate using CSPro and any discrepancies were corrected based on the paper form. Following the baseline survey, panchayats were stratified on the 16 administrative blocks in the sample and the panchayat-level mean of outstanding high cost (monthly interest rate of 4% or higher) debt held by households at baseline. They were then randomly assigned to an early rollout group or a late rollout group using the random number generator within the Stata statistical analysis software package. The baseline survey was administered to 8988 households across 333 villages in 179 panchayats. The target number of households per panchayat was 50, but there was some variation around this in reality. The lowest number of households in a given panchayat was 49 (9 panchayats), and the largest number was 53 households (3 panchayats). To ensure that control panchayats were not entered by the project, Jeevika held a quarterly ""evaluation panchayat"" meeting, which block project managers of the 16 blocks were required to attend. At these meetings the project M&E team checked whether any village in a control panchayat had been entered, and received an update on progress in treatment panchayats. This procedure was successful in maintaining adherence to randomized tr... Visit https://dataone.org/datasets/sha256%3A33337f03a8c2dabc0a718655e958c47678381b39ee277e0c820aeca2b66a6db8 for complete metadata about this dataset.

The number of workers across the eastern state of Bihar in India during financial year 2023 was nearly *** thousand workers. This was an increase from the previous year. The south Asian country of India had over ** million workers in financial year 2023.

To control the spread of COVID-19 in India and to aid the efforts of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW), the Population Council and other non-governmental organizations are conducting research to assess residents’ ability to follow sanitation and social distancing precautions under a countrywide lockdown. The Population Council COVID-19 study team is implementing rapid phone-based surveys to collect information on knowledge, attitudes and practices, as well as needs, among 2,041 young people (ages 19–23 years) and/or an adult household member, sampled from an existing prospective cohort study with a total sample size of 20,594 in Bihar (n=10,433) and Uttar Pradesh (n=10,161). Baseline was conducted from April 3–22; subsequent iterations of the survey are planned to be conducted on a monthly basis. Baseline findings on awareness of COVID-19 symptoms, perceived risk, awareness of and ability to carry out preventive behaviors, misconceptions, and fears will inform the development of government and other stakeholders’ interventions and/or strategies. We are committed to openly sharing the latest versions of the study description, questionnaires, de-identified or aggregated datasets, and preliminary results. Data and findings can also be shared with partners working on the COVID-19 response.

Abstract

What do we know about incentives and norms in health bureaucracies and service delivery points at various levels of a state in India? For example, the logic of economic theory suggests that governments should be direct providers of services when there is a role for attracting intrinsically motivated agents (Francois, 2000), but we have no empirical evidence on integrity and public service motivation among state personnel across different cadres of service delivery. The available research has focused on documenting evidence of weak incentives and low accountability for service delivery in the public sector, and thence on evaluating interventions targeted at strengthening incentives, such as making some part of pay conditional on performance indicators (for example, Singh and Masters, 2017). But what is available is barely scratching the surface of knowledge needed to help reform leaders think about how to structure government bureaucracies and assign tasks to leverage intrinsic motivation and to reduce reliance on high-powered incentives. Even when increasing the power of incentives has been shown to “work”, the authors of those findings concede that implementing optimal incentive contracts at scale can place significant demands on state capacity (Muralidharan and Sundararaman, 2011). There is even less evidence available about the incentives and motivation of mid-level bureaucrats within the health system, compared to a growing body of research on frontline providers such as doctors and community health workers. Finally, the logic of economic theory, and growing international evidence in support of it, further suggests that politics casts a long shadow on culture in the bureaucracy, but we have no rigorous evidence for this claim for India.

To address these knowledge gaps we designed and implemented a complex survey of multiple types of respondents across districts, blocks (administrative sub-units within districts) and village governments (Gram Panchayats or GPs) in Bihar, one of the poorest states of India and with some of the worst statistics of child malnourishment.

Geographic coverage

16 study districts, from among the 38 of Bihar, selected to represent the 9 administrative divisions of Bihar: Patna, Tirhut, Darbhanga, Kosi, Purnia, Saran, Bhagalpur, Munger, Magadh

Analysis unit

Households Health Staff Politicians Bureaucrats

Universe

Citizens, Within the category of citizens, the survey additionally targeted office-bearing members of women’s Self Help Groups (SHG) under a rural livelihoods program in Bihar known as Jeevika. Politicians Bureaucrats Public Providers of Health Services

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

Budget and implementation constraints required us to select a sample of districts rather than covering all 38 districts of Bihar. At the same time, we needed a large sample to be representative of the diversity within the state, and allow us to capture some variation across district-level institutional characteristics. These constraints led us to determine 16 as the number of districts in which to undertake the survey. The purposive selection of which 16 study districts, from among the 38 of Bihar, was made using the following criteria:

• represent the 9 administrative divisions of Bihar: Patna, Tirhut, Darbhanga, Kosi, Purnia, Saran, Bhagalpur, Munger, Magadh • represent both border and interior districts • select "old" and "new" districts (those which were created after 1991) because district age might matter in interesting ways for their capacity to deliver (to be discussed further) • select districts which might vary in historical institutions that shape norms.

We first explored an established literature in India which finds that there are persistent effects on current service delivery of the long-gone historical institution of the Zamindari system of land revenue (Pandey, 2010; Banerjee and Iyer, 2005). However, since all of the districts of Bihar are classified as belonging to the Zamindari system, we could not use this established measure of historical institutions in selecting the study districts. We then turned to a newer literature which examines the early construction of railway lines in the late 1800s in the United States and India as a potential source of institutional variation (Donaldson, 2018; Donaldson and Hornbeck, 2016; Atack, Haines and Margo, various). The 16 districts in our study include those through which passed the first railway lines in Bihar, and those that received railway lines a decade or so later.

Within each of the 16 districts, 4 blocks were selected using a random number generator,after stratifying by proximity to the main railway line. Within each block, 4 Gram Panchayats (GPs) were selected using a random number generator. However, in one block each in the districts of Lakhisarai and Buxar, 3 GPs instead of 4 were selected because the sampling protocol required a sufficient number of replacement respondents to be available, and these districts only had 3 GPs fulfilling the replacement requirement (more details in section on Respondents below). This yields a sample of respondents drawn from 16 districts, 64 blocks from within those districts, and 254 Gram Panchayats (GPs) from within those blocks.

Citizen Survey: The citizen survey was aimed at respondents from 16 households residing in each GP area. The survey firm was provided with a list of respondents (with replacements) drawn randomly from the electoral rolls available of all voting-age adults in Bihar's population. The target sample size is thus 4064 citizens (16 each from 254 GPs). Within the category of citizens, the survey additionally targeted office-bearing members of women's Self Help Groups (SHG) under a rural livelihoods program in Bihar known as Jeevika. However, we had no lists available with names of SHG leaders of the village-level organziations across GPs. In the absence of these lists, we relied on the survey firm to ensure that enumerator teams would identify SHG leaders during their field-work. The data from SHG leaders that has been provided to us is thus subject to a greater than usual caveat: the risk of whether the enumerator teams accuratelyidentified and obtained interviews with the targeted SHG respondents. The instructions provided to the survey teams was to ask the GP Mukhiya and other GPlevel respondents (such as the ANM, ASHA and AWW) about the GP-level federated organzation of all the SHGs across the GP's communities to identify its President,Secretary and Treasurer. That is, 3 SHG leaders were targeted for each GP, for a total sample of 762 (3 each from 254 GPs) SHG leaders.

Politician Survey: Lists were provided to the survey teams of all incumbent Mukhiyas to be interveiwed, and a random selection (with replacement) of 3 Ward members and 3 candidates from among those who contested the previous GP elections of 2016. The targeted sample size of GP politicians is thus 1778 (7 each from 254 GPs)

Bureaucrats: The survey firm was responsible for identifying and interviewing the respondents holding these positions. The final data submitted by the survey firm contains 293 respondents in supervisory or management positions, including: 13 Civil Surgeons,11 Chief Medical Officers (including 4 who were in Acting capacity), 23 Superintendents (including 13 in Deputy or Acting capacity), 9 District Programme Officers- NHM, 4 District RCH and Immunization In-charge, 7 District Community Mobilizers, 58 MOICs, 58 Acting Facility Incharge, 43 Block Program Managers-NHM, 29 Block RCH Programme officers, and 35 Block Community Mobilizers.

Public Providers of Health Services: The survey team was provided a list (with replacements) of 3 AWW workers to interveiw per GP, for a targeted sample of 762 AWW respondents. The survey team was provided with a list of randomly selected candidates for the categories of respondents for all the PHCs and higher-level health facilities (such as District Hospitals) across the 64 blocks of the study area.

Sampling deviation

Block Level: The survey firm was responsible for identifying the block-level politicians targeted to be interviewed. The targeted sample size of Block-Panchayat (Panchayat Samiti) elected members’ is 128 respondents (2 each from 64 blocks). The 57 MLAs across the 64 blocks of the study area were also identified by the survey firm. However, because of problems of reaching politicians at a time that was close to the 2019 elections in India, the survey firm was able to complete interviews with only 39 MLAs (of the targeted 57) , and with 119 Panchayat Samiti members (of the targeted 128).

District Level: The survey firm was responsible for identifying the MPs from constituencies within the 16 study districts, and the 32 respondents of the District-Panchayat (Zilla Parishad). Again, because of problems reaching political leaders at election time, the survey firm was able to interviewonly 9 MPs, and 28 Zilla Parishad members.

Public Providers of Health Care Services: The survey team was provided with a list of randomly selected candidates for the categories of respondents for all the PHCs and higher-level health facilities (such as District Hospitals) across the 64 blocks of the study area. However, the survey team reports substantial difficulty in adhering to this list because the personnel were not found at the health facilities. The survey team was not able to reach a random sample of providers appointed at these positions.

Census: Population: Bihar: Mirganj data was reported at 26,240.000 Person in 03-01-2011. This records an increase from the previous number of 23,576.000 Person for 03-01-2001. Census: Population: Bihar: Mirganj data is updated decadal, averaging 13,690.000 Person from Mar 1901 (Median) to 03-01-2011, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 26,240.000 Person in 03-01-2011 and a record low of 8,089.000 Person in 03-01-1911. Census: Population: Bihar: Mirganj data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. The data is categorized under India Premium Database’s Demographic – Table IN.GAC005: Census: Population: By Towns and Urban Agglomerations: Bihar.

Education details of Muzaffarpur city like 2015-16 - Total No. of Schools (within corporation city limits) 2016-17 - Total No. of Schools (within corporation city limits) 2017-18 - Total No. of Schools (within corporation city limits) 2015-16 - Total No. of School Aged population (age 5+) - Total 2016-17 - Total No. of School Aged population (age 5+) - Total 2017-18 - Total No. of School Aged population (age 5+) - Total 2015-16 - Total No. of School Aged population( age 5+) - Male 2016-17 - Total No. of School Aged population( age 5+) - Male 2017-18 - Total No. of School Aged population( age 5+) - Male 2015-16 - Total No. of School Aged population(5+) - Female 2016-17 - Total No. of School Aged population(5+) - Female 2017-18 - Total No. of School Aged population(5+) - Female 2015-16 - Number of school-aged population enrolled in primary and secondary school - Total (Public schools) 2016-17 - Number of school-aged population enrolled in primary and secondary school - Total (Public schools) 2017-18 - Number of school-aged population enrolled in primary and secondary school - Total (Public schools) 2015-16 - Number of school-aged population enrolled in primary and secondary school - Total (Private Schools) 2016-17 - Number of school-aged population enrolled in primary and secondary school - Total (Private Schools) 2017-18 - Number of school-aged population enrolled in primary and secondary school - Total (Private Schools) 2015-16 - Number of school-aged population enrolled in primary and secondary school - Male 2016-17 - Number of school-aged population enrolled in primary and secondary school - Male 2017-18 - Number of school-aged population enrolled in primary and secondary school - Male 2015-16 - Number of school-aged population enrolled in primary and secondary school - Female 2016-17 - Number of school-aged population enrolled in primary and secondary school - Female 2017-18 - Number of school-aged population enrolled in primary and secondary school - Female 2015-16 - Number of teachers in primary & secondary schools (Private) 2016-17 - Number of teachers in primary & secondary schools (Private) 2017-18 - Number of teachers in primary & secondary schools (Private) 2015-16 - Number of teachers in primary & secondary schools (Public) 2016-17 - Number of teachers in primary & secondary schools (Public) 2017-18 - Number of teachers in primary & secondary schools (Public)

Census: Population: Bihar: Barahiya: Male data was reported at 22,817.000 Person in 03-01-2011. This records an increase from the previous number of 21,129.000 Person for 03-01-2001. Census: Population: Bihar: Barahiya: Male data is updated decadal, averaging 14,248.000 Person from Mar 1951 (Median) to 03-01-2011, with 7 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 22,817.000 Person in 03-01-2011 and a record low of 10,724.000 Person in 03-01-1951. Census: Population: Bihar: Barahiya: Male data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. The data is categorized under India Premium Database’s Demographic – Table IN.GAC005: Census: Population: By Towns and Urban Agglomerations: Bihar.

The projected crude birth rate in India, at national level, was expected to decrease to about ** births per thousand people by 2031 to 2035 as opposed to the national crude birth rate from 2011 to 2015 which stood at more than ** births per thousand people. At state level, Bihar reflected the highest crude birth rate from 2011 to 2015 as well as the highest projected crude birth rate from 2031-2035. By contrast, the states with the lowest projected crude birth rates were Punjab, Tamil Nadu, and Andhra Pradesh during the same time period.

Census: Population: by Religion: Sikh: Bihar data was reported at 23,779.000 Person in 03-01-2011. This records an increase from the previous number of 20,780.000 Person for 03-01-2001. Census: Population: by Religion: Sikh: Bihar data is updated decadal, averaging 22,279.500 Person from Mar 2001 (Median) to 03-01-2011, with 2 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 23,779.000 Person in 03-01-2011 and a record low of 20,780.000 Person in 03-01-2001. Census: Population: by Religion: Sikh: Bihar data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. The data is categorized under India Premium Database’s Demographic – Table IN.GAE005: Census: Population: by Religion: Sikh.

The second National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), conducted in 1998-99, provides information on fertility, mortality, family planning, and important aspects of nutrition, health, and health care. The International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) coordinated the survey, which collected information from a nationally representative sample of more than 90,000 ever-married women age 15-49. The NFHS-2 sample covers 99 percent of India's population living in all 26 states. This report is based on the survey data for 25 of the 26 states, however, since data collection in Tripura was delayed due to local problems in the state. IIPS also coordinated the first National Family Health Survey (NFHS-1) in 1992-93. Most of the types of information collected in NFHS-2 were also collected in the earlier survey, making it possible to identify trends over the intervening period of six and one-half years. In addition, the NFHS-2 questionnaire covered a number of new or expanded topics with important policy implications, such as reproductive health, women's autonomy, domestic violence, women's nutrition, anaemia, and salt iodization. The NFHS-2 survey was carried out in two phases. Ten states were surveyed in the first phase which began in November 1998 and the remaining states (except Tripura) were surveyed in the second phase which began in March 1999. The field staff collected information from 91,196 households in these 25 states and interviewed 89,199 eligible women in these households. In addition, the survey collected information on 32,393 children born in the three years preceding the survey. One health investigator on each survey team measured the height and weight of eligible women and children and took blood samples to assess the prevalence of anaemia. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Three-quarters (73 percent) of the population lives in rural areas. The age distribution is typical of populations that have recently experienced a fertility decline, with relatively low proportions in the younger and older age groups. Thirty-six percent of the population is below age 15, and 5 percent is age 65 and above. The sex ratio is 957 females for every 1,000 males in rural areas but only 928 females for every 1,000 males in urban areas, suggesting that more men than women have migrated to urban areas. The survey provides a variety of demographic and socioeconomic background information. In the country as a whole, 82 percent of household heads are Hindu, 12 percent are Muslim, 3 percent are Christian, and 2 percent are Sikh. Muslims live disproportionately in urban areas, where they comprise 15 percent of household heads. Nineteen percent of household heads belong to scheduled castes, 9 percent belong to scheduled tribes, and 32 percent belong to other backward classes (OBCs). Two-fifths of household heads do not belong to any of these groups. Questions about housing conditions and the standard of living of households indicate some improvements since the time of NFHS-1. Sixty percent of households in India now have electricity and 39 percent have piped drinking water compared with 51 percent and 33 percent, respectively, at the time of NFHS-1. Sixty-four percent of households have no toilet facility compared with 70 percent at the time of NFHS-1. About three-fourths (75 percent) of males and half (51 percent) of females age six and above are literate, an increase of 6-8 percentage points from literacy rates at the time of NFHS-1. The percentage of illiterate males varies from 6-7 percent in Mizoram and Kerala to 37 percent in Bihar and the percentage of illiterate females varies from 11 percent in Mizoram and 15 percent in Kerala to 65 percent in Bihar. Seventy-nine percent of children age 6-14 are attending school, up from 68 percent in NFHS-1. The proportion of children attending school has increased for all ages, particularly for girls, but girls continue to lag behind boys in school attendance. Moreover, the disparity in school attendance by sex grows with increasing age of children. At age 6-10, 85 percent of boys attend school compared with 78 percent of girls. By age 15-17, 58 percent of boys attend school compared with 40 percent of girls. The percentage of girls 6-17 attending school varies from 51 percent in Bihar and 56 percent in Rajasthan to over 90 percent in Himachal Pradesh and Kerala. Women in India tend to marry at an early age. Thirty-four percent of women age 15-19 are already married including 4 percent who are married but gauna has yet to be performed. These proportions are even higher in the rural areas. Older women are more likely than younger women to have married at an early age: 39 percent of women currently age 45-49 married before age 15 compared with 14 percent of women currently age 15-19. Although this indicates that the proportion of women who marry young is declining rapidly, half the women even in the age group 20-24 have married before reaching the legal minimum age of 18 years. On average, women are five years younger than the men they marry. The median age at marriage varies from about 15 years in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Andhra Pradesh to 23 years in Goa. As part of an increasing emphasis on gender issues, NFHS-2 asked women about their participation in household decisionmaking. In India, 91 percent of women are involved in decision-making on at least one of four selected topics. A much lower proportion (52 percent), however, are involved in making decisions about their own health care. There are large variations among states in India with regard to women's involvement in household decisionmaking. More than three out of four women are involved in decisions about their own health care in Himachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, and Punjab compared with about two out of five or less in Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, and Rajasthan. Thirty-nine percent of women do work other than housework, and more than two-thirds of these women work for cash. Only 41 percent of women who earn cash can decide independently how to spend the money that they earn. Forty-three percent of working women report that their earnings constitute at least half of total family earnings, including 18 percent who report that the family is entirely dependent on their earnings. Women's work-participation rates vary from 9 percent in Punjab and 13 percent in Haryana to 60-70 percent in Manipur, Nagaland, and Arunachal Pradesh. FERTILITY AND FAMILY PLANNING Fertility continues to decline in India. At current fertility levels, women will have an average of 2.9 children each throughout their childbearing years. The total fertility rate (TFR) is down from 3.4 children per woman at the time of NFHS-1, but is still well above the replacement level of just over two children per woman. There are large variations in fertility among the states in India. Goa and Kerala have attained below replacement level fertility and Karnataka, Himachal Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, and Punjab are at or close to replacement level fertility. By contrast, fertility is 3.3 or more children per woman in Meghalaya, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Nagaland, Bihar, and Madhya Pradesh. More than one-third to less than half of all births in these latter states are fourth or higher-order births compared with 7-9 percent of births in Kerala, Goa, and Tamil Nadu. Efforts to encourage the trend towards lower fertility might usefully focus on groups within the population that have higher fertility than average. In India, rural women and women from scheduled tribes and scheduled castes have somewhat higher fertility than other women, but fertility is particularly high for illiterate women, poor women, and Muslim women. Another striking feature is the high level of childbearing among young women. More than half of women age 20-49 had their first birth before reaching age 20, and women age 15-19 account for almost one-fifth of total fertility. Studies in India and elsewhere have shown that health and mortality risks increase when women give birth at such young ages?both for the women themselves and for their children. Family planning programmes focusing on women in this age group could make a significant impact on maternal and child health and help to reduce fertility. INFANT AND CHILD MORTALITY NFHS-2 provides estimates of infant and child mortality and examines factors associated with the survival of young children. During the five years preceding the survey, the infant mortality rate was 68 deaths at age 0-11 months per 1,000 live births, substantially lower than 79 per 1,000 in the five years preceding the NFHS-1 survey. The child mortality rate, 29 deaths at age 1-4 years per 1,000 children reaching age one, also declined from the corresponding rate of 33 per 1,000 in NFHS-1. Ninety-five children out of 1,000 born do not live to age five years. Expressed differently, 1 in 15 children die in the first year of life, and 1 in 11 die before reaching age five. Child-survival programmes might usefully focus on specific groups of children with particularly high infant and child mortality rates, such as children who live in rural areas, children whose mothers are illiterate, children belonging to scheduled castes or scheduled tribes, and children from poor households. Infant mortality rates are more than two and one-half times as high for women who did not receive any of the recommended types of maternity related medical care than for mothers who did receive all recommended types of care. HEALTH, HEALTH CARE, AND NUTRITION Promotion of maternal and child health has been one of the most important components of the Family Welfare Programme of the Government of India. One goal is for each pregnant woman to receive at least three antenatal check-ups plus two tetanus toxoid injections and a full course of iron and folic acid supplementation. In India, mothers of 65 percent of the children born in the three years preceding NFHS-2 received at least one antenatal

Details of Muzaffarpur City like, Zone Name, Ward Name, Ward No., Area (in sq km), Total Population, Population - Male, Population - female.\