4 datasets found
  1. Airline Passenger and Freight Traffic (T100) - Domestic Segment Data (World...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Jun 25, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Research and Innovative Technology Administration (2021). Airline Passenger and Freight Traffic (T100) - Domestic Segment Data (World Area Code) - U.S. Air Carriers Traffic and Capacity February 2011 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/airline-passenger-and-freight-traffic-t100-domestic-segment-data-world-area-code-u-s-air-c-f8cf4
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 25, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Research and Innovative Technology Administrationhttps://archive.today/20110724174216/http://www.rita.dot.gov/index.html
    Description

    The Air Carrier Statistics database, also known as the T-100 data bank, contains domestic and international airline market and segment data. certificated U.S. air carriers report monthly air carrier traffic information using Form T-100. Foreign carriers having at least one point of service in the United States or one of its territories report monthly air carrier traffic information using Form T-100(f). The data is collected by the Office of Airline Information, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Research and Innovative Technology Administration.

  2. LoRaWAN Traffic Analysis Dataset

    • zenodo.org
    zip
    Updated Aug 28, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ales Povalac; Ales Povalac; Jan Kral; Jan Kral (2023). LoRaWAN Traffic Analysis Dataset [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7919213
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 28, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Ales Povalac; Ales Povalac; Jan Kral; Jan Kral
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset was created by a LoRaWAN sniffer and contains packets, which are thoroughly analyzed in the paper Exploring LoRaWAN Traffic: In-Depth Analysis of IoT Network Communications (not yet published). Data from the LoRaWAN sniffer was collected in four cities: Liege (Belgium), Graz (Austria), Vienna (Austria), and Brno (Czechia).

    Gateway ID: b827ebafac000001

    • Uplink reception (end-device => gateway)
    • Only packets containing CRC, inverted IQ
    • RX0: 867.1 MHz, 867.3 MHz, 867.5 MHz, 867.7 MHz, 867.9 MHz - BW 125 kHz and all SF
    • RX1: 868.1 MHz, 868.3 MHz, 868.5 MHz - BW 125 kHz and all SF

    Gateway ID: b827ebafac000002

    • Downlink reception (gateway => end-device)
    • Includes packets without CRC, non-inverted IQ
    • RX0: 867.1 MHz, 867.3 MHz, 867.5 MHz, 867.7 MHz, 867.9 MHz - BW 125 kHz and all SF
    • RX1: 868.1 MHz, 868.3 MHz, 868.5 MHz - BW 125 kHz and all SF

    Gateway ID: b827ebafac000003

    • Downlink reception (gateway => end-device) and Class-B beacon on 869.525 MHz
    • Includes packets without CRC, non-inverted IQ
    • RX0: 869.525 MHz - BW 125 kHz and all SF, BW 125 kHz and SF9 with implicit header, CR 4/5 and length 17 B

    To open the pcap files, you need Wireshark with current support for LoRaTap and LoRaWAN protocols. This support will be available in the official 4.1.0 release. A working version for Windows is accessible in the automated build system.

    The source data is available in the log.zip file, which contains the complete dataset obtained by the sniffer. A set of conversion tools for log processing is available on Github. The converted logs, available in Wireshark format, are stored in pcap.zip. For the LoRaWAN decoder, you can use the attached root and session keys. The processed outputs are stored in csv.zip, and graphical statistics are available in png.zip.

    This data represents a unique, geographically identifiable selection from the full log, cleaned of any errors. The records from Brno include communication between the gateway and a node with known keys.

    Test file :: 00_Test

    • short test file for parser verification
    • comparison of LoRaTap version 0 and version 1 formats

    Brno, Czech Republic :: 01_Brno

    • 49.22685N, 16.57536E, ASL 306m
    • lines 150873 to 529796
    • time 1.8.2022 15:04:28 to 17.8.2022 13:05:32
    • preliminary experiment
    • experimental device
      • Device EUI: 70b3d5cee0000042
      • Application key: d494d49a7b4053302bdcf96f1defa65a
      • Device address: 00d85395
      • Network session key: c417540b8b2afad8930c82fcf7ea54bb
      • Application session key: 421fea9bedd2cc497f63303edf5adf8e

    Liege, Belgium :: 02_Liege :: evaluated in the paper

    • 50.66445N, 5.59276E, ASL 151m
    • lines 636205 to 886868
    • time 25.8.2022 10:12:24 to 12.9.2022 06:20:48

    Brno, Czech Republic :: 03_Brno_join

    • 49.22685N, 16.57536E, ASL 306m
    • lines 947787 to 979382
    • time 30.9.2022 15:21:27 to 4.10.2022 10:46:31
    • record contains OTAA activation (Join Request / Join Accept)
    • experimental device:
      • Device EUI: 70b3d5cee0000042
      • Application key: d494d49a7b4053302bdcf96f1defa65a
      • Device address: 01e65ddc
      • Network session key: e2898779a03de59e2317b149abf00238
      • Application session key: 59ca1ac91922887093bc7b236bd1b07f

    Graz, Austria :: 04_Graz :: evaluated in the paper

    • 47.07049N, 15.44506E, ASL 364m
    • lines 1015139 to 1178855
    • time 26.10.2022 06:21:07 to 29.11.2022 10:03:00

    Vienna, Austria :: 05_Wien :: evaluated in the paper

    • 48.19666N, 16.37101E, ASL 204m
    • lines 1179308 to 3657105
    • time 1.12.2022 10:42:19 to 4.1.2023 14:00:05
    • contains a total of 14 short restarts (under 90 seconds)

    Brno, Czech Republic :: 07_Brno :: evaluated in the paper

    • 49.22685N, 16.57536E, ASL 306m
    • lines 4969648 to 6919392
    • time 16.2.2023 8:53:43 to 30.3.2023 9:00:11
  3. a

    Equity Index Zipcode

    • gisdata-piercecowa.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Aug 28, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Pierce County, Washington (2025). Equity Index Zipcode [Dataset]. https://gisdata-piercecowa.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/equity-index-zipcode
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 28, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Pierce County, Washington
    Area covered
    Description

    The Pierce County Equity Index data highlights opportunities to improve equitable access and outcomes for residents of Pierce County. The very low definition is indicative of overall lower community conditions and vice versa. This Index includes an overall Equity Index rating which is made up of six categories (Community Vitality, Education, Environmental Health, Health and Wellness, Housing and Infrastructure, Jobs and Economy), and 42 individual data points. The data is presented in the Pierce County Equity Index web application (https://piercecountywa.equityindex.econw.io/).How Are Index Scores Calculated?Each block group is assigned a z-score, which indicates how it compares to the county average for a specific indicator. After normalizing the underlying estimates, these z-scores are averaged across all indicators within a category to calculate the Category Score. Finally, the Category Scores are averaged to produce the Overall Equity Index Score.The z-scores range from negative to positive values, where:Negative Scores: Indicate performance below the county average.Scores of 0 Indicate performance at the county average.Positive Scores: Indicate performance above the county average.These scores help you evaluate the relative strengths and weaknesses of block groups in terms of equity dimensions such as housing, health, and education. They also provide insights into how these dimensions contribute to the overall equity index. Equity Index: measures the average score of all 6 categories, providing a single assessment of equity for Pierce County.Community Vitality: Measures community participation and connection, including access to amenities and services that contribute to the overall well-being of a community. Indicators include, Community and Recreation Center Access, Crime Rate, Daycare Access, Heavy Traffic Proximity, Library Access, Park Access, Transit Access, Voter Participation.Education: Measures educational outcomes. Indicators include, Assessment met Standard, Chronic Absentee, Dual Credit Enrollment, Education Attainment, High School Graduation Rate, Kindergarten Readiness, Student Teacher Ratio.Environmental Health: Measures environmental factors that can impact community safety and health. Indicators include, Diesel Emissions, Drinking Water Non-Compliant, Extreme Heat Days, Fire Risk, Flood Risk, Ozone Concentration, Tree Canopy Cover, Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 Concentration, Superfund Site Proximity.Health and Wellness: Measures health results and access to healthy living. Indicators include: Cancer Rate, Depression Prevalence, Healthy Food Access, Health Uninsured rate, Opiod Overdose Call Rate, Low Life Expectancy, Poor Health.Housing and Infrastructure: Measures housing conditions and community access to important infrastructure. Indicators include, Housing Affordability, Average Transit Stop Per Hour, Total Cost Burdened Households, Homeownership Rate, Internet AccessJobs and Economy: Measures the local economy and job access. Indicators include, Commute under 15 min, High Quality Jobs, Median Household Income, Households at 200% of the Poverty Line or Less, Unemployment Rate, Vehicle Access. Please read metadata for additional information (https://matterhorn.piercecountywa.gov/GISmetadata/pdbis_equity_zipcode.html). Any use or data download constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use (https://matterhorn.piercecountywa.gov/disclaimer/PierceCountyGISDataTermsofUse.pdf).

  4. Data from: Revealing QoE of Web Users from Encrypted Network Traffic

    • figshare.com
    zip
    Updated Jun 16, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Alexis Huet; Antoine Saverimoutou; Zied Ben Houidi; Hao Shi; Shengming Cai; Jinchun Xu; Bertrand Mathieu; Dario Rossi (2020). Revealing QoE of Web Users from Encrypted Network Traffic [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12459293.v1
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 16, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Alexis Huet; Antoine Saverimoutou; Zied Ben Houidi; Hao Shi; Shengming Cai; Jinchun Xu; Bertrand Mathieu; Dario Rossi
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    We present a dataset targeting a large set of popular pages (Alexa top-500), from probes from several ISPs networks, browsers software (Chrome, Firefox) and viewport combinations, for over 200,000 experiments realized in 2019.We purposely collect two distinct sets with two different tools, namely Web Page Test (WPT) and Web View (WV), varying a number of relevant parameters and conditions, for a total of 200K+ web sessions, roughly equally split among WV and WPT. Our dataset comprises variations in terms of geographical coverage, scale, diversity and representativeness (location, targets, protocol, browser, viewports, metrics).For Web Page Test, we used the online service www.webpagetest.org at different locations worldwide (Europe, Asia, USA) and private WPT instances in three locations in China (Beijing, Shanghai, Dongguan). The list of target URLs comprised the main pages and five random subpages from Alexa top-500 worldwide and China. We varied network conditions : native connections and 4G, FIOS, 3GFast, DSL, and custom shaping/loss conditions. The other elements in the configuration were fixed: Chrome browser on desktop with a fixed screen resolution, HTTP/2 protocol and IPv4.For Web View, we collected experiments from three machines located in France. We selected two versions of two browser families (Chrome 75/77, Firefox 63/68), two screen sizes (1920x1080, 1440x900), and employ different browser configurations (one half of the experiments activate the AdBlock plugin) from two different access technologies (fiber and ADSL). From a protocol standpoint, we used both IPv4 and IPv6, with HTTP/2 and QUIC, and performed repeated experiments with cached objects/DNS. Given the settings diversity, we restricted the number of websites to about 50 among the Alexa top-500 websites, to ensure statistical relevance of the collected samples for each page.The two archives IFIPNetworking2020_WebViewOrange.zip and IFIPNetworking2020_Webpagetest.zip correspond respectively to the Web View experiments and to the Web Page Test experiments.Each archive contains three files:- config.csv: Description of parameters and conditions for each run,- metrics.csv: Value of different metrics collected by the browser,- progressionCurves.csv: Progression curves of the bytes progress as seen by the network, from 0 to 10 seconds by steps of 100 milliseconds,- listUrl folder: Indexes the sets of urls.Regarding config.csv, the columns are: - index: Index for this set of conditions, - location: Location of the machine, - listUrl: List of urls, located in the folder listUrl - browserUsed: Internet browser and version - terminal: Desktop or Mobile - collectionEnvironment: Identification of the collection environment - networkConditionsTrafficShaping (WPT only): Whether native condition or traffic shaping (4G, FIOS, 3GFast, DSL, or custom Emulator conditions) - networkConditionsBandwidth (WPT only): Bandwidth of the network - networkConditionsDelay (WPT only): Delay in the network - networkConditions (WV only): network conditions - ipMode (WV only): requested L3 protocol, - requestedProtocol (WV only): requested L7 protocol - adBlocker (WV only): Whether adBlocker is used or not - winSize (WV only): Window sizeRegarding metrics.csv, the columns are: - id: Unique identification of an experiment (consisting of an index 'set of conditions' and an index 'current page') - DOM Content Loaded Event End (ms): DOM time, - First Paint (ms) (WV only): First paint time, - Load Event End (ms): Page Load Time from W3C, - RUM Speed Index (ms) (WV only): RUM Speed Index, - Speed Index (ms) (WPT only): Speed Index, - Time for Full Visual Rendering (ms) (WV only): Time for Full Visual Rendering - Visible portion (%) (WV only): Visible portion, - Time to First Byte (ms) (WPT only): Time to First Byte, - Visually Complete (ms) (WPT only): Visually Complete used to compute the Speed Index, - aatf: aatf using ATF-chrome-plugin - bi_aatf: bi_aatf using ATF-chrome-plugin - bi_plt: bi_plt using ATF-chrome-plugin - dom: dom using ATF-chrome-plugin - ii_aatf: ii_aatf using ATF-chrome-plugin - ii_plt: ii_plt using ATF-chrome-plugin - last_css: last_css using ATF-chrome-plugin - last_img: last_img using ATF-chrome-plugin - last_js: last_js using ATF-chrome-plugin - nb_ress_css: nb_ress_css using ATF-chrome-plugin - nb_ress_img: nb_ress_img using ATF-chrome-plugin - nb_ress_js: nb_ress_js using ATF-chrome-plugin - num_origins: num_origins using ATF-chrome-plugin - num_ressources: num_ressources using ATF-chrome-plugin - oi_aatf: oi_aatf using ATF-chrome-plugin - oi_plt: oi_plt using ATF-chrome-plugin - plt: plt using ATF-chrome-pluginRegarding progressionCurves.csv, the columns are: - id: Unique identification of an experiment (consisting of an index 'set of conditions' and an index 'current page') - url: Url of the current page. SUBPAGE stands for a path. - run: Current run (linked with index of the config for WPT) - filename: Filename of the pcap - fullname: Fullname of the pcap - har_size: Size of the HAR for this experiment, - pagedata_size: Size of the page data report - pcap_size: Size of the pcap - App Byte Index (ms): Application Byte Index as computed from the har file (in the browser) - bytesIn_APP: Total bytes in as seen in the browser, - bytesIn_NET: Total bytes in as seen in the network, - X_BI_net: Network Byte Index computed from the pcap file (in the network) - X_bin_0_for_B_completion to X_bin_99_for_B_completion: X_bin_k_for_B_completion is the bytes progress reached after k*100 millisecondsIf you use these datasets in your research, you can reference to the appropriate paper:@inproceedings{qoeNetworking2020, title={Revealing QoE of Web Users from Encrypted Network Traffic}, author={Huet, Alexis and Saverimoutou, Antoine and Ben Houidi, Zied and Shi, Hao and Cai, Shengming and Xu, Jinchun and Mathieu, Bertrand and Rossi, Dario}, booktitle={2020 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking)}, year={2020}, organization={IEEE}}

  5. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Research and Innovative Technology Administration (2021). Airline Passenger and Freight Traffic (T100) - Domestic Segment Data (World Area Code) - U.S. Air Carriers Traffic and Capacity February 2011 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/airline-passenger-and-freight-traffic-t100-domestic-segment-data-world-area-code-u-s-air-c-f8cf4
Organization logo

Airline Passenger and Freight Traffic (T100) - Domestic Segment Data (World Area Code) - U.S. Air Carriers Traffic and Capacity February 2011

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Jun 25, 2021
Dataset provided by
Research and Innovative Technology Administrationhttps://archive.today/20110724174216/http://www.rita.dot.gov/index.html
Description

The Air Carrier Statistics database, also known as the T-100 data bank, contains domestic and international airline market and segment data. certificated U.S. air carriers report monthly air carrier traffic information using Form T-100. Foreign carriers having at least one point of service in the United States or one of its territories report monthly air carrier traffic information using Form T-100(f). The data is collected by the Office of Airline Information, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Research and Innovative Technology Administration.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu