The American motor vehicle fleet traveled about ***** billion vehicle-miles in February 2025. Compared with January 2025, traffic decreased by about **** billion vehicle-miles. Between January and December 2024, traffic volume came to around *** trillion vehicle-miles of travel.

In 2025, smartphones across the globe used an average of 21.11 gigabytes of mobile data per month, up from 19.14 gigabytes the previous year. This figure is expected to reach 36.51 gigabytes by 2030.

Mobile PCs and routers processed a reported ****exabyte of data per month in 2024, up from *** exabyte the previous year. This figure is expected to reach * exabytes per month by 2030, with global data use set to explode over the coming years.

Internet traffic volume measures global IP traffic, or the amount of data being sent and received over the internet globally each month. Data and forecasts are sourced from Cisco Systems Inc.

Comprehensive dataset analyzing Amazon's daily website visits, traffic patterns, seasonal trends, and comparative analysis with other ecommerce platforms based on May 2025 data.

The Traffic Volume Trends montly report is a natinal data report that provides quality controlled vehicle miles traveled data for each State for all roadways

General data recollected for the studio " Analysis of the Quantitative Impact of Social Networks on Web Traffic of Cybermedia in the 27 Countries of the European Union". Four research questions are posed: what percentage of the total web traffic generated by cybermedia in the European Union comes from social networks? Is said percentage higher or lower than that provided through direct traffic and through the use of search engines via SEO positioning? Which social networks have a greater impact? And is there any degree of relationship between the specific weight of social networks in the web traffic of a cybermedia and circumstances such as the average duration of the user's visit, the number of page views or the bounce rate understood in its formal aspect of not performing any kind of interaction on the visited page beyond reading its content? To answer these questions, we have first proceeded to a selection of the cybermedia with the highest web traffic of the 27 countries that are currently part of the European Union after the United Kingdom left on December 31, 2020. In each nation we have selected five media using a combination of the global web traffic metrics provided by the tools Alexa (https://www.alexa.com/), which ceased to be operational on May 1, 2022, and SimilarWeb (https:// www.similarweb.com/). We have not used local metrics by country since the results obtained with these first two tools were sufficiently significant and our objective is not to establish a ranking of cybermedia by nation but to examine the relevance of social networks in their web traffic. In all cases, cybermedia whose property corresponds to a journalistic company have been selected, ruling out those belonging to telecommunications portals or service providers; in some cases they correspond to classic information companies (both newspapers and televisions) while in others they refer to digital natives, without this circumstance affecting the nature of the research proposed.
Below we have proceeded to examine the web traffic data of said cybermedia. The period corresponding to the months of October, November and December 2021 and January, February and March 2022 has been selected. We believe that this six-month stretch allows possible one-time variations to be overcome for a month, reinforcing the precision of the data obtained. To secure this data, we have used the SimilarWeb tool, currently the most precise tool that exists when examining the web traffic of a portal, although it is limited to that coming from desktops and laptops, without taking into account those that come from mobile devices, currently impossible to determine with existing measurement tools on the market. It includes:

Web traffic general data: average visit duration, pages per visit and bounce rate Web traffic origin by country Percentage of traffic generated from social media over total web traffic Distribution of web traffic generated from social networks Comparison of web traffic generated from social netwoks with direct and search procedures

The dataset contains information about web requests to a single website. It's a time series dataset, which means it tracks data over time, making it great for machine learning analysis.

The dataset presented in this forum is monthly data. The Port Authority collects monthly data for domestic and international, cargo, flights, passengers and aircraft equipment type from each carrier at PANYNJ-operated airports. The data is aggregated and forms the basis for estimating flight fees, parking, concession, and PFC revenues at the Port Authority Airports.

The statistic shows estimated internet data traffic per month in the United States from 2018 to 2023. In 2018, total internet data traffic was estimated to amount to 33.45 million exabytes per month.

The Traffic Volume Trends montly report is a natinal data report that provides quality controlled vehicle miles traveled data for each State for all roadways

Please refer to the original data article for further data description: Jan Luxemburk et al. CESNET-QUIC22: A large one-month QUIC network traffic dataset from backbone lines, Data in Brief, 2023, 108888, ISSN 2352-3409, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.108888. We recommend using the CESNET DataZoo python library, which facilitates the work with large network traffic datasets. More information about the DataZoo project can be found in the GitHub repository https://github.com/CESNET/cesnet-datazoo. The QUIC (Quick UDP Internet Connection) protocol has the potential to replace TLS over TCP, which is the standard choice for reliable and secure Internet communication. Due to its design that makes the inspection of QUIC handshakes challenging and its usage in HTTP/3, there is an increasing demand for research in QUIC traffic analysis. This dataset contains one month of QUIC traffic collected in an ISP backbone network, which connects 500 large institutions and serves around half a million people. The data are delivered as enriched flows that can be useful for various network monitoring tasks. The provided server names and packet-level information allow research in the encrypted traffic classification area. Moreover, included QUIC versions and user agents (smartphone, web browser, and operating system identifiers) provide information for large-scale QUIC deployment studies. Data capture The data was captured in the flow monitoring infrastructure of the CESNET2 network. The capturing was done for four weeks between 31.10.2022 and 27.11.2022. The following list provides per-week flow count, capture period, and uncompressed size:

W-2022-44

Uncompressed Size: 19 GB Capture Period: 31.10.2022 - 6.11.2022 Number of flows: 32.6M W-2022-45

Uncompressed Size: 25 GB Capture Period: 7.11.2022 - 13.11.2022 Number of flows: 42.6M W-2022-46

Uncompressed Size: 20 GB Capture Period: 14.11.2022 - 20.11.2022 Number of flows: 33.7M W-2022-47

Uncompressed Size: 25 GB Capture Period: 21.11.2022 - 27.11.2022 Number of flows: 44.1M CESNET-QUIC22

Uncompressed Size: 89 GB Capture Period: 31.10.2022 - 27.11.2022 Number of flows: 153M

Data description The dataset consists of network flows describing encrypted QUIC communications. Flows were created using ipfixprobe flow exporter and are extended with packet metadata sequences, packet histograms, and with fields extracted from the QUIC Initial Packet, which is the first packet of the QUIC connection handshake. The extracted handshake fields are the Server Name Indication (SNI) domain, the used version of the QUIC protocol, and the user agent string that is available in a subset of QUIC communications. Packet Sequences Flows in the dataset are extended with sequences of packet sizes, directions, and inter-packet times. For the packet sizes, we consider payload size after transport headers (UDP headers for the QUIC case). Packet directions are encoded as ±1, +1 meaning a packet sent from client to server, and -1 a packet from server to client. Inter-packet times depend on the location of communicating hosts, their distance, and on the network conditions on the path. However, it is still possible to extract relevant information that correlates with user interactions and, for example, with the time required for an API/server/database to process the received data and generate the response to be sent in the next packet. Packet metadata sequences have a length of 30, which is the default setting of the used flow exporter. We also derive three fields from each packet sequence: its length, time duration, and the number of roundtrips. The roundtrips are counted as the number of changes in the communication direction (from packet directions data); in other words, each client request and server response pair counts as one roundtrip. Flow statistics Flows also include standard flow statistics, which represent aggregated information about the entire bidirectional flow. The fields are: the number of transmitted bytes and packets in both directions, the duration of flow, and packet histograms. Packet histograms include binned counts of packet sizes and inter-packet times of the entire flow in both directions (more information in the PHISTS plugin documentation There are eight bins with a logarithmic scale; the intervals are 0-15, 16-31, 32-63, 64-127, 128-255, 256-511, 512-1024, >1024 [ms or B]. The units are milliseconds for inter-packet times and bytes for packet sizes. Moreover, each flow has its end reason - either it was idle, reached the active timeout, or ended due to other reasons. This corresponds with the official IANA IPFIX-specified values. The FLOW_ENDREASON_OTHER field represents the forced end and lack of resources reasons. The end of flow detected reason is not considered because it is not relevant for UDP connections. Dataset structure The dataset flows are delivered in compressed CSV files. CSV files contain one flow per row; data columns are summarized in the provided list below. For each flow data file, there is a JSON file with the number of saved and seen (before sampling) flows per service and total counts of all received (observed on the CESNET2 network), service (belonging to one of the dataset's services), and saved (provided in the dataset) flows. There is also the stats-week.json file aggregating flow counts of a whole week and the stats-dataset.json file aggregating flow counts for the entire dataset. Flow counts before sampling can be used to compute sampling ratios of individual services and to resample the dataset back to the original service distribution. Moreover, various dataset statistics, such as feature distributions and value counts of QUIC versions and user agents, are provided in the dataset-statistics folder. The mapping between services and service providers is provided in the servicemap.csv file, which also includes SNI domains used for ground truth labeling. The following list describes flow data fields in CSV files:

ID: Unique identifier SRC_IP: Source IP address DST_IP: Destination IP address DST_ASN: Destination Autonomous System number SRC_PORT: Source port DST_PORT: Destination port PROTOCOL: Transport protocol QUIC_VERSION QUIC: protocol version QUIC_SNI: Server Name Indication domain QUIC_USER_AGENT: User agent string, if available in the QUIC Initial Packet TIME_FIRST: Timestamp of the first packet in format YYYY-MM-DDTHH-MM-SS.ffffff TIME_LAST: Timestamp of the last packet in format YYYY-MM-DDTHH-MM-SS.ffffff DURATION: Duration of the flow in seconds BYTES: Number of transmitted bytes from client to server BYTES_REV: Number of transmitted bytes from server to client PACKETS: Number of packets transmitted from client to server PACKETS_REV: Number of packets transmitted from server to client PPI: Packet metadata sequence in the format: [[inter-packet times], [packet directions], [packet sizes]] PPI_LEN: Number of packets in the PPI sequence PPI_DURATION: Duration of the PPI sequence in seconds PPI_ROUNDTRIPS: Number of roundtrips in the PPI sequence PHIST_SRC_SIZES: Histogram of packet sizes from client to server PHIST_DST_SIZES: Histogram of packet sizes from server to client PHIST_SRC_IPT: Histogram of inter-packet times from client to server PHIST_DST_IPT: Histogram of inter-packet times from server to client APP: Web service label CATEGORY: Service category FLOW_ENDREASON_IDLE: Flow was terminated because it was idle FLOW_ENDREASON_ACTIVE: Flow was terminated because it reached the active timeout FLOW_ENDREASON_OTHER: Flow was terminated for other reasons

Link to other CESNET datasets

https://www.liberouter.org/technology-v2/tools-services-datasets/datasets/ https://github.com/CESNET/cesnet-datazoo Please cite the original data article:

@article{CESNETQUIC22, author = {Jan Luxemburk and Karel Hynek and Tomáš Čejka and Andrej Lukačovič and Pavel Šiška}, title = {CESNET-QUIC22: a large one-month QUIC network traffic dataset from backbone lines}, journal = {Data in Brief}, pages = {108888}, year = {2023}, issn = {2352-3409}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.108888}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340923000069} }

This dataset contains hourly pedestrian counts since 2009 from pedestrian sensor devices located across the city. The data is updated on a monthly basis and can be used to determine variations in pedestrian activity throughout the day.The sensor_id column can be used to merge the data with the Pedestrian Counting System - Sensor Locations dataset which details the location, status and directional readings of sensors. Any changes to sensor locations are important to consider when analysing and interpreting pedestrian counts over time.Importants notes about this dataset:• Where no pedestrians have passed underneath a sensor during an hour, a count of zero will be shown for the sensor for that hour.• Directional readings are not included, though we hope to make this available later in the year. Directional readings are provided in the Pedestrian Counting System – Past Hour (counts per minute) dataset.The Pedestrian Counting System helps to understand how people use different city locations at different times of day to better inform decision-making and plan for the future. A representation of pedestrian volume which compares each location on any given day and time can be found in our Online Visualisation.Related datasets:Pedestrian Counting System – Past Hour (counts per minute)Pedestrian Counting System - Sensor Locations

In 2025, smartphones worldwide used 138.55 exabytes of mobile data per month, up from 120.81 exabytes the previous year. This figure is expected to increase rapidly in the coming years, with forecasts expecting monthly mobile data traffic of 273.67 exabytes by 2030.

The Traffic Volume Trends montly report is a natinal data report that provides quality controlled vehicle miles traveled data for each State for all roadways

The Traffic Volume Trends montly report is a natinal data report that provides quality controlled vehicle miles traveled data for each State for all roadways

The Traffic Volume Trends montly report is a natinal data report that provides quality controlled vehicle miles traveled data for each State for all roadways

The Traffic Volume Trends montly report is a natinal data report that provides quality controlled vehicle miles traveled data for each State for all roadways

Redirect Notice: The website https://transbase.sfgov.org/ is no longer in operation. Visitors to Transbase will be redirected to this page where they can view, visualize, and download Traffic Crash data.A. SUMMARYThis table contains all crashes resulting in an injury in the City of San Francisco. Fatality year-to-date crash data is obtained from the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OME) death records, and only includes those cases that meet the San Francisco Vision Zero Fatality Protocol maintained by the San Francisco Department of Public Health (SFDPH), San Francisco Police Department (SFPD), and San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA). Injury crash data is obtained from SFPD’s Interim Collision System for 2018 through the current year-to-date, Crossroads Software Traffic Collision Database (CR) for years 2013-2017 and the Statewide Integrated Transportation Record System (SWITRS) maintained by the California Highway Patrol for all years prior to 2013. Only crashes with valid geographic information are mapped. All geocodable crash data is represented on the simplified San Francisco street centerline model maintained by the Department of Public Works (SFDPW). Collision injury data is queried and aggregated on a quarterly basis. Crashes occurring at complex intersections with multiple roadways are mapped onto a single point and injury and fatality crashes occurring on highways are excluded.The crash, party, and victim tables have a relational structure. The traffic crashes table contains information on each crash, one record per crash. The party table contains information from all parties involved in the crashes, one record per party. Parties are individuals involved in a traffic crash including drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, and parked vehicles. The victim table contains information about each party injured in the collision, including any passengers. Injury severity is included in the victim table. For example, a crash occurs (1 record in the crash table) that involves a driver party and a pedestrian party (2 records in the party table). Only the pedestrian is injured and thus is the only victim (1 record in the victim table). To learn more about the traffic injury datasets, see the TIMS documentationB. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATEDTraffic crash injury data is collected from the California Highway Patrol 555 Crash Report as submitted by the police officer within 30 days after the crash occurred. All fields that match the SWITRS data schema are programmatically extracted, de-identified, geocoded, and loaded into TransBASE. See Section D below for details regarding TransBASE. C. UPDATE PROCESSAfter review by SFPD and SFDPH staff, the data is made publicly available approximately a month after the end of the previous quarter (May for Q1, August for Q2, November for Q3, and February for Q4). D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASETThis data is being provided as public information as defined under San Francisco and California public records laws. SFDPH, SFMTA, and SFPD cannot limit or restrict the use of this data or its interpretation by other parties in any way. Where the data is communicated, distributed, reproduced, mapped, or used in any other way, the user should acknowledge TransBASE.sfgov.org as the source of the data, provide a reference to the original data source where also applicable, include the date the data was pulled, and note any caveats specified in the associated metadata documentation provided. However, users should not attribute their analysis or interpretation of this data to the City of San Francisco. While the data has been collected and/or produced for the use of the City of San Francisco, it cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Accordingly, the City of San Francisco, including SFDPH, SFMTA, and SFPD make no representation as to the accuracy of the information or its suitability for any purpose and disclaim any liability for omissions or errors that may be contained therein. As all data is associated with methodological assumptions and limitations, the City recommends that users review methodological documentation associated with the data prior to its analysis, interpretation, or communication.This dataset can also be queried on the TransBASE Dashboard. TransBASE is a geospatially enabled database maintained by SFDPH that currently includes over 200 spatially referenced variables from multiple agencies and across a range of geographic scales, including infrastructure, transportation, zoning, sociodemographic, and collision data, all linked to an intersection or street segment. TransBASE facilitates a data-driven approach to understanding and addressing transportation-related health issues,informed by a large and growing evidence base regarding the importance of transportation system design and land use decisions for health. TransBASE’s purpose is to inform public and private efforts to improve transportation system safety, sustainability, community health and equity in San Francisco.E. RELATED DATASETSTraffic Crashes Resulting in Injury: Parties InvolvedTraffic Crashes Resulting in Injury: Victims InvolvedTransBASE DashboardiSWITRSTIMSData pushed to ArcGIS Online on November 5, 2025 at 4:19 PM by SFGIS.Data from: https://data.sfgov.org/d/ubvf-ztfxDescription of dataset columns:

 unique_id
 unique table row identifier


 cnn_intrsctn_fkey
 nearest intersection centerline node key


 cnn_sgmt_fkey
 nearest street centerline segment key (empty if crash occurred at intersection)


 case_id_pkey
 unique crash report number


 tb_latitude
 latitude of crash (WGS 84)


 tb_longitude
 longitude of crash (WGS 84)


 geocode_source
 geocode source


 geocode_location
 geocode location


 collision_datetime
 the date and time when the crash occurred


 collision_date
 the date when the crash occurred


 collision_time
 the time when the crash occurred (24 hour time)


 accident_year
 the year when the crash occurred


 month
 month crash occurred


 day_of_week
 day of the week crash occurred


 time_cat
 generic time categories


 juris
 jurisdiction


 officer_id
 officer ID


 reporting_district
 SFPD reporting district


 beat_number
 SFPD beat number


 primary_rd
 the road the crash occurred on


 secondary_rd
 a secondary reference road that DISTANCE and DIRECT are measured from


 distance
 offset distance from secondary road


 direction
 direction of offset distance


 weather_1
 the weather condition at the time of the crash


 weather_2
 the weather condition at the time of the crash, if a second description is necessary


 collision_severity
 the injury level severity of the crash (highest level of injury in crash)


 type_of_collision
 type of crash


 mviw
 motor vehicle involved with


 ped_action
 pedestrian action involved


 road_surface
 road surface


 road_cond_1
 road condition


 road_cond_2
 road condition, if a second description is necessary


 lighting
 lighting at time of crash


 control_device
 control device status


 intersection
 indicates whether the crash occurred in an intersection


 vz_pcf_code
 California vehicle code primary collision factor violated


 vz_pcf_group
 groupings of similar vehicle codes violated


 vz_pcf_description
 description of vehicle code violated


 vz_pcf_link
 link to California vehicle code section


 number_killed
 counts victims in the crash with degree of injury of fatal


 number_injured
 counts victims in the crash with degree of injury of severe, visible, or complaint of pain


 street_view
 link to Google Streetview


 dph_col_grp
 generic crash groupings based on parties involved


 dph_col_grp_description
 description of crash groupings


 party_at_fault
 party number indicated as being at fault


 party1_type
 party 1 vehicle type


 party1_dir_of_travel
 party 1 direction of travel


 party1_move_pre_acc
 party 1 movement preceding crash


 party2_type
 party 2 vehicle type (empty if no party 2)


 party2_dir_of_travel
 party 2 direction of travel (empty if no party 2)


 party2_move_pre_acc
 party 2 movement preceding crash (empty if no party 2)


 point
 geometry type of crash location


 data_as_of
 date data added to the source system


 data_updated_at
 date data last updated the source system


 data_loaded_at
 date data last loaded here (in the open data portal)


 analysis_neighborhood



 supervisor_district



 police_district



 Current Police Districts
 This column was automatically created in order to record in what polygon from the dataset 'Current Police Districts' (qgnn-b9vv) the point in column 'point' is located. This enables the creation of region maps (choropleths) in the visualization canvas and data lens.


 Current Supervisor Districts
 This column was automatically created in order to record in what polygon from the dataset 'Current Supervisor Districts' (26cr-cadq) the point in column 'point' is located. This

Splitgraph serves as an HTTP API that lets you run SQL queries directly on this data to power Web applications. For example:

See the Splitgraph documentation for more information.