The global website visitor tracking software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing need for businesses to understand online customer behavior and optimize their digital strategies. The market, estimated at $5 billion in 2025, is projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $15 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors, including the rising adoption of digital marketing strategies, the growing importance of data-driven decision-making, and the increasing sophistication of website visitor tracking tools. Cloud-based solutions dominate the market due to their scalability, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, particularly appealing to Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). However, large enterprises continue to invest significantly in on-premise solutions for enhanced data security and control. The market is highly competitive, with numerous established players and emerging startups offering a range of features and functionalities. Technological advancements, such as AI-powered analytics and enhanced integration with other marketing tools, are shaping the future of the market. The market's geographical distribution reflects the global digital landscape. North America, with its mature digital economy and high adoption rates, holds a significant market share. However, regions like Asia-Pacific are showing rapid growth, driven by increasing internet penetration and digitalization across various industries. Despite the overall positive outlook, challenges such as data privacy regulations and the increasing complexity of website tracking technology are influencing market dynamics. The ongoing competition among vendors necessitates continuous innovation and the development of more user-friendly and insightful tools. The future growth of the website visitor tracking software market is promising, fueled by the continuing importance of data-driven decision-making within marketing and business strategies. A key factor will be the ongoing adaptation to evolving privacy regulations and user expectations.

Web traffic statistics for the several City-Parish websites, brla.gov, city.brla.gov, Red Stick Ready, GIS, Open Data etc. Information provided by Google Analytics.

shopify.com is ranked #82 in US with 245.63M Traffic. Categories: Computer Software and Development, Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

Mobile accounts for approximately half of web traffic worldwide. In the last quarter of 2024, mobile devices (excluding tablets) generated 62.54 percent of global website traffic. Mobiles and smartphones consistently hoovered around the 50 percent mark since the beginning of 2017, before surpassing it in 2020. Mobile traffic Due to low infrastructure and financial restraints, many emerging digital markets skipped the desktop internet phase entirely and moved straight onto mobile internet via smartphone and tablet devices. India is a prime example of a market with a significant mobile-first online population. Other countries with a significant share of mobile internet traffic include Nigeria, Ghana and Kenya. In most African markets, mobile accounts for more than half of the web traffic. By contrast, mobile only makes up around 45.49 percent of online traffic in the United States. Mobile usage The most popular mobile internet activities worldwide include watching movies or videos online, e-mail usage and accessing social media. Apps are a very popular way to watch video on the go and the most-downloaded entertainment apps in the Apple App Store are Netflix, Tencent Video and Amazon Prime Video.

Traffic analytics, rankings, and competitive metrics for tracker.gg as of May 2025

This data set contains internet traffic data captured by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) using Mikrotik SDN Controller and packet sniffer tools. The data set includes traffic from over 2000 customers who use Fibre to the Home (FTTH) and Gpon internet connections. The data was collected over a period of several months and contains all traffic in its original format with headers and packets.

The data set contains information on inbound and outbound traffic, including web browsing, email, file transfers, and more. The data set can be used for research in areas such as network security, traffic analysis, and machine learning.

**Data Collection Method: ** The data was captured using Mikrotik SDN Controller and packet sniffer tools. These tools capture traffic data by monitoring network traffic in real-time. The data set contains all traffic data in its original format, including headers and packets.

**Data Set Content: ** The data set is provided in a CSV format and includes the following fields:

1. Timestamp: The date and time the traffic was captured
2. Source IP Address: The IP address of the device that sent the traffic Destination IP Address: The IP address of the device that received the traffic Protocol: The network protocol used for the traffic (e.g. TCP, UDP) Source Port: The port used by the source device for the traffic Destination Port: The port used by the destination device for the traffic Packet Size: The size of the packet in bytes Payload: The payload data of the packet The data set contains a large volume of traffic data from over 2000 customers. The data is organized by timestamp and includes all traffic data in its original format, including headers and packets. The data set contains both inbound and outbound traffic, and covers various types of internet traffic, including web browsing, email, file transfers, and more. one of listed protocols: ipsec-ah - IPsec AH protocol *ipsec-esp - IPsec ESP protocol ddp - datagram delivery protocol egp - exterior gateway protocol ggp - gateway-gateway protocol gre - general routing encapsulation hmp - host monitoring protocol idpr-cmtp - idpr control message transport icmp - internet control message protocol icmpv6 - internet control message protocol v6 igmp - internet group management protocol ipencap - ip encapsulated in ip ipip - ip encapsulation encap - ip encapsulation iso-tp4 - iso transport protocol class 4 ospf - open shortest path first pup - parc universal packet protocol pim - protocol independent multicast rspf - radio shortest path first rdp - reliable datagram protocol st - st datagram mode tcp - transmission control protocol udp - user datagram protocol vmtp - versatile message transport vrrp - virtual router redundancy protocol xns-idp - xerox xns idp xtp - xpress transfer protocol

MAC Protocol Examples 802.2 - 802.2 Frames (0x0004) arp - Address Resolution Protocol (0x0806) homeplug-av - HomePlug AV MME (0x88E1) ip - Internet Protocol version 4 (0x0800) ipv6 - Internet Protocol Version 6 (0x86DD) ipx - Internetwork Packet Exchange (0x8137) lldp - Link Layer Discovery Protocol (0x88CC) loop-protect - Loop Protect Protocol (0x9003) mpls-multicast - MPLS multicast (0x8848) mpls-unicast - MPLS unicast (0x8847) packing-compr - Encapsulated packets with compressed IP packing (0x9001) packing-simple - Encapsulated packets with simple IP packing (0x9000) pppoe - PPPoE Session Stage (0x8864) pppoe-discovery - PPPoE Discovery Stage (0x8863) rarp - Reverse Address Resolution Protocol (0x8035) service-vlan - Provider Bridging (IEEE 802.1ad) & Shortest Path Bridging IEEE 802.1aq (0x88A8) vlan - VLAN-tagged frame (IEEE 802.1Q) and Shortest Path Bridging IEEE 802.1aq with NNI compatibility (0x8100)

**Data Usage: ** The data set can be used for research in areas such as network security, traffic analysis, and machine learning. Researchers can use the data to develop new algorithms for detecting and preventing cyber attacks, analyzing internet traffic patterns, and more.

**Data Availability: ** If you are interested in using this data set for research purposes, please contact us at asfandyar250@gmail.com for more information and references. The data set is available for download on Kaggle and can be accessed by researchers who have obtained permission from the ISP.

We hope this data set will be useful for researchers in the field of network security and traffic analysis. If you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact us. https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F5985737%2F61c81ce9eb393f8fc7c15540c9819b95%2FData.PNG?generation=1683750473536727&alt=media" alt=""> You can use Wireshark or other software's to view files

secure-hotel-tracker.com is ranked #15446 in US with 2.09M Traffic. Categories: Hospitality, Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

live-tracker.site is ranked #656 in PK with 423.87K Traffic. Categories: . Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

The FDOT Telemetered Traffic Monitoring Site (TTMS) feature class provides information on Florida Telemetered Traffic Monitoring Site locations, as well affiliated information like KFCTR and TFCTR from the FDOT Traffic Characteristics Inventory database. This dataset is maintained by the Transportation Data & Analytics office (TDA). The source spatial data for this hosted feature layer was created on: 07/19/2025.Download Data: Enter Guest as Username to download the source shapefile from here: https://ftp.fdot.gov/file/d/FTP/FDOT/co/planning/transtat/gis/shapefiles/DOTShapesFGDB.zip

The global website traffic analysis tool market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing reliance on digital marketing and the need for businesses of all sizes to understand their online audience. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $45 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. The rising adoption of cloud-based solutions provides scalability and cost-effectiveness for businesses, particularly SMEs seeking affordable analytics. Moreover, the evolution of sophisticated analytics features, including advanced user behavior tracking and predictive analytics, enhances the value proposition for both SMEs and large enterprises. The market is segmented by application (SMEs and large enterprises) and by type (cloud-based and web-based), with cloud-based solutions dominating due to their accessibility and flexibility. Competitive pressures among numerous vendors, including established players like Google Analytics, Semrush, and Ahrefs, as well as emerging niche players, drive innovation and affordability, benefiting users. Geographic distribution shows strong growth across North America and Europe, with Asia-Pacific emerging as a high-growth region. However, factors such as data privacy concerns and the increasing complexity of website analytics can act as potential restraints. Despite these challenges, the continued expansion of e-commerce and digital marketing strategies across various industries will solidify the demand for robust website traffic analysis tools. The market is expected to witness further consolidation through mergers and acquisitions, with leading players investing heavily in research and development to enhance their offerings. The increasing need for real-time data analysis and integration with other marketing automation platforms will further shape market evolution. The emergence of AI-powered analytics, providing predictive insights and automated reporting, is transforming the industry and will continue to drive market expansion in the coming years. This makes this market an attractive landscape for investors and technology providers looking for strong future growth.

Snapshot img { margin: 10px !important; }

Global network traffic analytics Industry Overview

Technavio’s analysts have identified the increasing use of network traffic analytics solutions to be one of major factors driving market growth. With the rapidly changing IT infrastructure, security hackers can steal valuable information through various modes. With the increasing dependence on web applications and websites for day-to-day activities and financial transactions, the instances of theft have increased globally. Also, the emergence of social networking websites has aided the malicious attackers to extract valuable information from vulnerable users. The increasing consumer dependence on web applications and websites for day-to-day activities and financial transactions are further increasing the risks of theft. This encourages the organizations to adopt network traffic analytics solutions.

Want a bigger picture? Try a FREE sample of this report now!

See the complete table of contents and list of exhibits, as well as selected illustrations and example pages from this report.

Companies covered

The network traffic analytics market is fairly concentrated due to the presence of few established companies offering innovative and differentiated software and services. By offering a complete analysis of the competitiveness of the players in the network monitoring tools market offering varied software and services, this network traffic analytics industry analysis report will aid clients identify new growth opportunities and design new growth strategies.

The report offers a complete analysis of a number of companies including:

• Allot
• Cisco Systems
• IBM
• Juniper Networks
• Microsoft
• Symantec

Network traffic analytics market growth based on geographic regions

• Americas
• APAC
• EMEA

With a complete study of the growth opportunities for the companies across regions such as the Americas, APAC, and EMEA, our industry research analysts have estimated that countries in the Americas will contribute significantly to the growth of the network monitoring tools market throughout the predicted period.

Network traffic analytics market growth based on end-user

• Telecom
• BFSI
• Healthcare
• Media and entertainment

According to our market research experts, the telecom end-user industry will be the major end-user of the network monitoring tools market throughout the forecast period. Factors suc

The Website Visitor Tracking Software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing need for businesses to understand online customer behavior and optimize their digital strategies. This market, currently valued at approximately $5 billion in 2025, is projected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. The rising adoption of cloud-based solutions offers scalability and cost-effectiveness, attracting both SMEs and large enterprises. Furthermore, the increasing sophistication of analytics features within these platforms allows for deeper insights into website traffic, user engagement, and conversion rates. This empowers businesses to personalize user experiences, refine marketing campaigns, and ultimately drive revenue growth. The market segmentation reveals a significant share held by cloud-based solutions due to their accessibility and flexibility, while the large enterprise segment is a primary revenue driver due to its higher spending capacity. Competition is intense, with established players like Google Analytics and Adobe Analytics alongside a burgeoning number of specialized providers offering unique features and functionalities. The competitive landscape is dynamic, with established players facing challenges from nimble startups innovating in areas like AI-powered behavioral analytics and personalized recommendations. While data privacy concerns and the increasing complexity of tracking regulations represent potential restraints, the overall market outlook remains positive. The continued growth of e-commerce, digital marketing, and the broader digital economy will fuel further demand for sophisticated visitor tracking solutions. Geographic expansion, particularly in rapidly developing economies within Asia-Pacific and Latin America, will contribute significantly to market expansion over the forecast period. The integration of website visitor tracking with other marketing automation and CRM tools is another key trend, further solidifying its importance within a comprehensive digital strategy. The market's future hinges on the continuous innovation in data analytics capabilities, the development of user-friendly interfaces, and the ability to adapt to evolving privacy regulations.

Unlock the Power of Behavioural Data with GDPR-Compliant Clickstream Insights.

Swash clickstream data offers a comprehensive and GDPR-compliant dataset sourced from users worldwide, encompassing both desktop and mobile browsing behaviour. Here's an in-depth look at what sets us apart and how our data can benefit your organisation.

User-Centric Approach: Unlike traditional data collection methods, we take a user-centric approach by rewarding users for the data they willingly provide. This unique methodology ensures transparent data collection practices, encourages user participation, and establishes trust between data providers and consumers.

Wide Coverage and Varied Categories: Our clickstream data covers diverse categories, including search, shopping, and URL visits. Whether you are interested in understanding user preferences in e-commerce, analysing search behaviour across different industries, or tracking website visits, our data provides a rich and multi-dimensional view of user activities.

GDPR Compliance and Privacy: We prioritise data privacy and strictly adhere to GDPR guidelines. Our data collection methods are fully compliant, ensuring the protection of user identities and personal information. You can confidently leverage our clickstream data without compromising privacy or facing regulatory challenges.

Market Intelligence and Consumer Behaviuor: Gain deep insights into market intelligence and consumer behaviour using our clickstream data. Understand trends, preferences, and user behaviour patterns by analysing the comprehensive user-level, time-stamped raw or processed data feed. Uncover valuable information about user journeys, search funnels, and paths to purchase to enhance your marketing strategies and drive business growth.

High-Frequency Updates and Consistency: We provide high-frequency updates and consistent user participation, offering both historical data and ongoing daily delivery. This ensures you have access to up-to-date insights and a continuous data feed for comprehensive analysis. Our reliable and consistent data empowers you to make accurate and timely decisions.

Custom Reporting and Analysis: We understand that every organisation has unique requirements. That's why we offer customisable reporting options, allowing you to tailor the analysis and reporting of clickstream data to your specific needs. Whether you need detailed metrics, visualisations, or in-depth analytics, we provide the flexibility to meet your reporting requirements.

Data Quality and Credibility: We take data quality seriously. Our data sourcing practices are designed to ensure responsible and reliable data collection. We implement rigorous data cleaning, validation, and verification processes, guaranteeing the accuracy and reliability of our clickstream data. You can confidently rely on our data to drive your decision-making processes.

Context

This file contains 5 years of daily time series data for several measures of traffic on a statistical forecasting teaching notes website whose alias is statforecasting.com. The variables have complex seasonality that is keyed to the day of the week and to the academic calendar. The patterns you you see here are similar in principle to what you would see in other daily data with day-of-week and time-of-year effects. Some good exercises are to develop a 1-day-ahead forecasting model, a 7-day ahead forecasting model, and an entire-next-week forecasting model (i.e., next 7 days) for unique visitors.

Content

The variables are daily counts of page loads, unique visitors, first-time visitors, and returning visitors to an academic teaching notes website. There are 2167 rows of data spanning the date range from September 14, 2014, to August 19, 2020. A visit is defined as a stream of hits on one or more pages on the site on a given day by the same user, as identified by IP address. Multiple individuals with a shared IP address (e.g., in a computer lab) are considered as a single user, so real users may be undercounted to some extent. A visit is classified as "unique" if a hit from the same IP address has not come within the last 6 hours. Returning visitors are identified by cookies if those are accepted. All others are classified as first-time visitors, so the count of unique visitors is the sum of the counts of returning and first-time visitors by definition. The data was collected through a traffic monitoring service known as StatCounter.

Inspiration

This file and a number of other sample datasets can also be found on the website of RegressIt, a free Excel add-in for linear and logistic regression which I originally developed for use in the course whose website generated the traffic data given here. If you use Excel to some extent as well as Python or R, you might want to try it out on this dataset.

The FDOT Portable Traffic Monitoring Site (PTMS) feature class provides information on Florida Portable Traffic Monitoring Site locations, as well affiliated information like KFCTR and TFCTR from the FDOT Traffic Characteristics Inventory database. This dataset is maintained by the Transportation Data & Analytics office (TDA). The source spatial data for this hosted feature layer was created on: 07/12/2025.Download Data: Enter Guest as Username to download the source shapefile from here: https://ftp.fdot.gov/file/d/FTP/FDOT/co/planning/transtat/gis/shapefiles/ptms.zip

Information included:counts, provided as average daily flowsan estimate of heavy vehiclesthe number of days sampledtype of sensor equipment.Traffic monitoring for state highways: user manual [PDF 465 KB]

Data reuse caveats: as per license.Data quality statement: please read the accompanying user manual, explaining:how this data is collectedidentification of count stationstraffic monitoring technologymonitoring hierarchy and conventionstypical survey specificationdata calculationTMS operation.Traffic monitoring for state highways: user manual [PDF 465 KB]

Data quality caveats: it isn’t possible to accurately capture all vehicles using dual loops. An error margin of 2% - 5% is normal. Sites with congestion or lane changing can have higher error margins.AADT (average annual daily traffic) accuracy depends on sampling frequency.Classification isn’t possible at single loop sites, and not all counts at dual loop sites are classified counts. The daily counts at non-continuous sites are adjusted using values from continuous sites. For API explorer users, there is a known issue with number-based attribute filters where the “AND” operator is used instead of the “BETWEEN” operator. Substituting “BETWEEN” for “AND” manually in the query URL will resolve this.

youtube.com is ranked #1 in KR with 42.83B Traffic. Categories: Newspapers, Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

In March 2024, close to 4.4 billion unique global visitors had visited Wikipedia.org, slightly down from 4.4 billion visitors since August of the same year. Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia with articles generated by volunteers worldwide. The platform is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation.

amazon.com is ranked #5 in US with 2.56B Traffic. Categories: Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

Please refer to the original data article for further data description: Jan Luxemburk et al. CESNET-QUIC22: A large one-month QUIC network traffic dataset from backbone lines, Data in Brief, 2023, 108888, ISSN 2352-3409, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.108888. We recommend using the CESNET DataZoo python library, which facilitates the work with large network traffic datasets. More information about the DataZoo project can be found in the GitHub repository https://github.com/CESNET/cesnet-datazoo. The QUIC (Quick UDP Internet Connection) protocol has the potential to replace TLS over TCP, which is the standard choice for reliable and secure Internet communication. Due to its design that makes the inspection of QUIC handshakes challenging and its usage in HTTP/3, there is an increasing demand for research in QUIC traffic analysis. This dataset contains one month of QUIC traffic collected in an ISP backbone network, which connects 500 large institutions and serves around half a million people. The data are delivered as enriched flows that can be useful for various network monitoring tasks. The provided server names and packet-level information allow research in the encrypted traffic classification area. Moreover, included QUIC versions and user agents (smartphone, web browser, and operating system identifiers) provide information for large-scale QUIC deployment studies. Data capture The data was captured in the flow monitoring infrastructure of the CESNET2 network. The capturing was done for four weeks between 31.10.2022 and 27.11.2022. The following list provides per-week flow count, capture period, and uncompressed size:

W-2022-44

Uncompressed Size: 19 GB Capture Period: 31.10.2022 - 6.11.2022 Number of flows: 32.6M W-2022-45

Uncompressed Size: 25 GB Capture Period: 7.11.2022 - 13.11.2022 Number of flows: 42.6M W-2022-46

Uncompressed Size: 20 GB Capture Period: 14.11.2022 - 20.11.2022 Number of flows: 33.7M W-2022-47

Uncompressed Size: 25 GB Capture Period: 21.11.2022 - 27.11.2022 Number of flows: 44.1M CESNET-QUIC22

Uncompressed Size: 89 GB Capture Period: 31.10.2022 - 27.11.2022 Number of flows: 153M

Data description The dataset consists of network flows describing encrypted QUIC communications. Flows were created using ipfixprobe flow exporter and are extended with packet metadata sequences, packet histograms, and with fields extracted from the QUIC Initial Packet, which is the first packet of the QUIC connection handshake. The extracted handshake fields are the Server Name Indication (SNI) domain, the used version of the QUIC protocol, and the user agent string that is available in a subset of QUIC communications. Packet Sequences Flows in the dataset are extended with sequences of packet sizes, directions, and inter-packet times. For the packet sizes, we consider payload size after transport headers (UDP headers for the QUIC case). Packet directions are encoded as ±1, +1 meaning a packet sent from client to server, and -1 a packet from server to client. Inter-packet times depend on the location of communicating hosts, their distance, and on the network conditions on the path. However, it is still possible to extract relevant information that correlates with user interactions and, for example, with the time required for an API/server/database to process the received data and generate the response to be sent in the next packet. Packet metadata sequences have a length of 30, which is the default setting of the used flow exporter. We also derive three fields from each packet sequence: its length, time duration, and the number of roundtrips. The roundtrips are counted as the number of changes in the communication direction (from packet directions data); in other words, each client request and server response pair counts as one roundtrip. Flow statistics Flows also include standard flow statistics, which represent aggregated information about the entire bidirectional flow. The fields are: the number of transmitted bytes and packets in both directions, the duration of flow, and packet histograms. Packet histograms include binned counts of packet sizes and inter-packet times of the entire flow in both directions (more information in the PHISTS plugin documentation There are eight bins with a logarithmic scale; the intervals are 0-15, 16-31, 32-63, 64-127, 128-255, 256-511, 512-1024, >1024 [ms or B]. The units are milliseconds for inter-packet times and bytes for packet sizes. Moreover, each flow has its end reason - either it was idle, reached the active timeout, or ended due to other reasons. This corresponds with the official IANA IPFIX-specified values. The FLOW_ENDREASON_OTHER field represents the forced end and lack of resources reasons. The end of flow detected reason is not considered because it is not relevant for UDP connections. Dataset structure The dataset flows are delivered in compressed CSV files. CSV files contain one flow per row; data columns are summarized in the provided list below. For each flow data file, there is a JSON file with the number of saved and seen (before sampling) flows per service and total counts of all received (observed on the CESNET2 network), service (belonging to one of the dataset's services), and saved (provided in the dataset) flows. There is also the stats-week.json file aggregating flow counts of a whole week and the stats-dataset.json file aggregating flow counts for the entire dataset. Flow counts before sampling can be used to compute sampling ratios of individual services and to resample the dataset back to the original service distribution. Moreover, various dataset statistics, such as feature distributions and value counts of QUIC versions and user agents, are provided in the dataset-statistics folder. The mapping between services and service providers is provided in the servicemap.csv file, which also includes SNI domains used for ground truth labeling. The following list describes flow data fields in CSV files:

ID: Unique identifier SRC_IP: Source IP address DST_IP: Destination IP address DST_ASN: Destination Autonomous System number SRC_PORT: Source port DST_PORT: Destination port PROTOCOL: Transport protocol QUIC_VERSION QUIC: protocol version QUIC_SNI: Server Name Indication domain QUIC_USER_AGENT: User agent string, if available in the QUIC Initial Packet TIME_FIRST: Timestamp of the first packet in format YYYY-MM-DDTHH-MM-SS.ffffff TIME_LAST: Timestamp of the last packet in format YYYY-MM-DDTHH-MM-SS.ffffff DURATION: Duration of the flow in seconds BYTES: Number of transmitted bytes from client to server BYTES_REV: Number of transmitted bytes from server to client PACKETS: Number of packets transmitted from client to server PACKETS_REV: Number of packets transmitted from server to client PPI: Packet metadata sequence in the format: [[inter-packet times], [packet directions], [packet sizes]] PPI_LEN: Number of packets in the PPI sequence PPI_DURATION: Duration of the PPI sequence in seconds PPI_ROUNDTRIPS: Number of roundtrips in the PPI sequence PHIST_SRC_SIZES: Histogram of packet sizes from client to server PHIST_DST_SIZES: Histogram of packet sizes from server to client PHIST_SRC_IPT: Histogram of inter-packet times from client to server PHIST_DST_IPT: Histogram of inter-packet times from server to client APP: Web service label CATEGORY: Service category FLOW_ENDREASON_IDLE: Flow was terminated because it was idle FLOW_ENDREASON_ACTIVE: Flow was terminated because it reached the active timeout FLOW_ENDREASON_OTHER: Flow was terminated for other reasons

Link to other CESNET datasets

https://www.liberouter.org/technology-v2/tools-services-datasets/datasets/ https://github.com/CESNET/cesnet-datazoo Please cite the original data article:

@article{CESNETQUIC22, author = {Jan Luxemburk and Karel Hynek and Tomáš Čejka and Andrej Lukačovič and Pavel Šiška}, title = {CESNET-QUIC22: a large one-month QUIC network traffic dataset from backbone lines}, journal = {Data in Brief}, pages = {108888}, year = {2023}, issn = {2352-3409}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.108888}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340923000069} }